Free
Correspondence  |   October 2017
In Reply
Author Notes
  • Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France (M.B.). matthieu.biais@chu-bordeaux.fr
  • (Accepted for publication July 7, 2017.)
    (Accepted for publication July 7, 2017.)×
Article Information
Correspondence
Correspondence   |   October 2017
In Reply
Anesthesiology 10 2017, Vol.127, 729-730. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000001823
Anesthesiology 10 2017, Vol.127, 729-730. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000001823
We thank Dr. Jacquet-Lagrèze et al. for their interest in our recent article1  and are happy to respond to their comments.
We fully agree with Dr. Jacquet-Lagrèze et al. on the pivotal value of Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies2  to improve the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies. As clearly mentioned in the article, inclusions were conducted over a 1-yr period among nonconsecutive patients, and only 28 patients were included. As stated in the Discussion section, we therefore cannot exclude the possibility of selection bias.
We respectfully fully disagree with Dr. Jacquet-Lagrèze et al. when they claimed that the studies cited in the article do not support the rationale to define responders to volume expansion as an increase of stroke volume of 10% or more. We invite the authors to read these recommendations3,4  carefully and many other publications on the subject.5 
The least significant change has not been yet evaluated for proAQT system (Pulsion Medical Systems, Feldkirchen, Germany). However, the algorithm for pulse contour analysis of the proAQT system is the same as that of the PiCCO system (Pulsion Medical Systems). The main difference between these two devices lies in cardiac output calibration (i.e., transpulmonary thermodilution for the PiCCO and specific algorithm without external method for the proAQT system). Previous studies demonstrated that the proAQT pulse contour analysis algorithm was able to detect changes in cardiac output as small as 5.0% during an end-expiratory occlusion test,6  10.0% during a passive leg raising test,7  9.5% during a respiratory cycle,8  and, even more recently, 6.0% during a mini-fluid challenge.9  Although we fully concur with the authors that additional research is warranted, our data remain nevertheless in line with most recent literature.
Finally, we apologize to the authors for having omitted some significant contributions. However, most of them were unavailable at the time of the submission process without, from our point of view, providing added value (postoperative setting, positive end expiratory pressure elevation in septic patients, mean arterial pressure monitoring, pulmonary elimination of carbon dioxide, etc.).
Competing Interests
Dr. Biais received honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences (Irvine, California) and Pulsion Medical Systems (Feldkirchen, Germany) as a lecturer. Dr. Futier received honoraria from Dräger AG (Lübeck, Germany), GE Healthcare (Little Chalfont, United Kingdom), and Fresenius Kabi (Bad Homburg vor der Höhe, Germany) as a lecturer and travel reimbursement by Fisher & Paykel Healthcare (Auckland, New Zealand). The other authors declare no competing interests.
Matthieu Biais, M.D., Ph.D., Emmanuel Futier, M.D., Ph.D., Bruno Pereira, Ph.D., Karine Nouette-Gaulain, M.D., Ph.D. Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France (M.B.). matthieu.biais@chu-bordeaux.fr
References
Biais, M, Lanchon, R, Sesay, M, Le Gall, L, Pereira, B, Futier, E, Nouette-Gaulain, K . Changes in stroke volume induced by lung recruitment maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients in the operating room. Anesthesiology 2017; 126:260–7 [Article] [PubMed]
Bossuyt, PM, Reitsma, JB, Bruns, DE, Gatsonis, CA, Glasziou, PP, Irwig, L, Lijmer, JG, Moher, D, Rennie, D, de Vet, HC, Kressel, HY, Rifai, N, Golub, RM, Altman, DG, Hooft, L, Korevaar, DA, Cohen, JF ; STARD Group: STARD 2015: An updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 2015; 351:h5527 [Article] [PubMed]
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. CardioQ-ODM Oesophageal Doppler Monitor. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/mtg3. Accessed May 5, 2014.
Vallet, B, Blanloeil, Y, Cholley, B, Orliaguet, G, Pierre, S, Tavernier, B ; Société Française d’Anesthésie et de Réanimation: Guidelines for perioperative haemodynamic optimization. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2013; 32:e151–8 [Article] [PubMed]
Pearse, RM, Harrison, DA, MacDonald, N, Gillies, MA, Blunt, M, Ackland, G, Grocott, MP, Ahern, A, Griggs, K, Scott, R, Hinds, C, Rowan, K ; OPTIMISE Study Group: Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: A randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA 2014; 311:2181–90 [Article] [PubMed]
Monnet, X, Osman, D, Ridel, C, Lamia, B, Richard, C, Teboul, JL . Predicting volume responsiveness by using the end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:951–6 [Article] [PubMed]
Jabot, J, Teboul, JL, Richard, C, Monnet, X . Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: Importance of the postural change. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35:85–90 [Article] [PubMed]
Berkenstadt, H, Margalit, N, Hadani, M, Friedman, Z, Segal, E, Villa, Y, Perel, A . Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92:984–9 [Article] [PubMed]
Biais, M, de Courson, H, Lanchon, R, Pereira, B, Bardonneau, G, Griton, M, Sesay, M, Nouette-Gaulain, K . Mini-fluid challenge of 100 ml of crystalloid predicts fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Anesthesiology 2017; 127:450–6 [Article] [PubMed]