Correspondence  |   October 2017
Nerve Blocks and Length of Stay?
Author Notes
  • Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark (H.K.). henrik.kehlet@regionh.dk
  • (Accepted for publication June 7, 2017.)
    (Accepted for publication June 7, 2017.)×
Article Information
Correspondence
Correspondence   |   October 2017
Nerve Blocks and Length of Stay?
Anesthesiology 10 2017, Vol.127, 718. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000001782
Anesthesiology 10 2017, Vol.127, 718. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000001782
McIsaac et al.1  recently published their population-based cohort study on outcomes after total knee arthroplasty in relation to the use of peripheral nerve blocks. The primary outcome was length of stay (LOS), and they concluded that nerve blocks reduced LOS (risk ratio = 0.98!).
Although such large cohort studies may be valuable, we find the discussion insufficient in relation to the primary outcome, where we get no information on why the patients were hospitalized or whether a type of fast-track care was implemented.2  Furthermore, there is no information about discharge destination, which we know from several studies may hinder sufficient interpretation of LOS, because transfer of patients to rehabilitation or other institutions may depend on potential economic benefit3  or on local traditions4  and may misleadingly reduce the registered LOS after surgery.3  Finally, their mean LOS was approximately 4.7 days, which is beyond what has been published before (but not referred to) from prospective multicenter studies with a mean LOS of 3.0 days5  from well-defined fast-track programs without the use of peripheral blockades. Also, median values of LOS of approximately two days in subsequent large cohorts are available.6 
First Page Preview
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview ×
View Large