Correspondence  |   November 2016
In Reply
Author Notes
  • Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (R.B.). richard.brull@uhn.ca
  • (Accepted for publication July 19, 2016.)
    (Accepted for publication July 19, 2016.)×
Article Information
Correspondence
Correspondence   |   November 2016
In Reply
Anesthesiology 11 2016, Vol.125, 1073-1074. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000001306
Anesthesiology 11 2016, Vol.125, 1073-1074. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000001306
We thank Drs. La Colla and Chelly for their comments on our article.1  We hereby address their comments in a point-by-point fashion, as received.
While the volume and concentration of local anesthetics used in adductor canal or femoral blocks, as well as the type of graft received in ACL reconstruction, are thought to influence the outcomes evaluated in this study, namely pain and motor power, these assumptions are not supported by contemporary evidence, including our own.
The authors declare no competing interests.
First Page Preview
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview ×
View Large