Free
Correspondence  |   May 2016
In Reply
Author Notes
  • Brigham and Women’s Health Care and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. jrathmell@bwh.harvard.edu
  • (Accepted for publication January 11, 2016.)
    (Accepted for publication January 11, 2016.)×
Article Information
Correspondence
Correspondence   |   May 2016
In Reply
Anesthesiology 5 2016, Vol.124, 1194. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000001062
Anesthesiology 5 2016, Vol.124, 1194. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000001062
I would like to thank Dr. Wlody for his letter expressing concern about the image we created for the November 2015 issue of Anesthesiology. We took the photograph to illustrate the great diversity among individuals who are now entering the field of anesthesiology. My colleagues in the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, were kind enough to help me create this image. My instructions to the group were to congregate in the main hospital lobby, inside the facility, where the image was taken.
Dr. Wlody is hinting at an important topic that has caught the attention of regulatory bodies in recent years, including The Joint Commission and the Massachusetts Department of Health. There is currently much focus on surgical attire that can be linked to the recommendations published by the Association of periOperative Registered Nurses (AORN).1  This group has summarized the available scientific evidence regarding the use of various components of surgical attire and put forth a set of recommendations that are widely being held as the current standard by regulatory organizations. Much of the science is weak, yet many of the AORN recommendations appear logical. The newest AORN guidelines are strict: all facial hair must be covered; face masks should be tied tightly in place or completely removed, never worn dangling loosely around the neck; arms should be completely covered with long-sleeved surgical attire; and all attire worn in the operating room must be newly laundered in a healthcare–accredited laundry facility.
For the cover photograph, our group assembled in the lobby, and no one ventured outside of the facility in their operating-room attire. There does not appear to be an increased bacterial contamination when surgical attire is worn inside and outside the perioperative suite within the facility,2  and the AORN guidelines call for a change to newly laundered attire only when entering the perioperative environment from outside of the facility. Nonetheless, Dr. Wlody’s point is well taken. We all should pay close attention to our own personal conduct to minimize avoidable risk to our patients. Strict hand washing and wearing newly laundered surgical attire that has never been worn outside of the facility are two simple ways that are likely to help make the environment we work in safer.
Competing Interests
The author declares no competing interests.
James P. Rathmell, M.D., Brigham and Women’s Health Care and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. jrathmell@bwh.harvard.edu
References
Association of periOperative Registered Nurses (AORN), Guideline for surgical attires. Guidelines for Perioperative Practice. (2015). Denver AORN 97–119
Sivanandan, I, Bowker, KE, Bannister, GC, Soar, J Reducing the risk of surgical site infection: A case controlled study of contamination of theatre clothing.. J Perioper Pract. (2011). 21 69–72 [PubMed]