Free
Critical Care Medicine  |   January 2016
JM25-1, a Lidocaine Analog Combining Airway Relaxant and Antiinflammatory Properties: Implications for New Bronchospasm Therapy
Author Notes
  • From the Laboratory of Inflammation (M.F.S., G.C.C., A.C.C., C.R.P., K.I.M.d.C., E.A.A.-V., J.C.S.C., R.S.B.C., P.M.R.S., M.A.M.) and Laboratory of Cellular Communication (R.X.F.), Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; and Institute of Biomedical Sciences (J.S.N.) and Laboratory of Clinical Bacteriology and Immunology (P.C.O.), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • The first two authors contributed equally to this article (M.F.S. and J.S.N.).
    The first two authors contributed equally to this article (M.F.S. and J.S.N.).×
  • Submitted for publication March 26, 2015. Accepted for publication September 16, 2015.
    Submitted for publication March 26, 2015. Accepted for publication September 16, 2015.×
  • Address correspondence to Dr. Martins: Laboratory of Inflammation, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Avenida Brasil 4365, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro 21045, Brazil. mmartins@ioc.fiocruz.br. Information on purchasing reprints may be found at www.anesthesiology.org or on the masthead page at the beginning of this issue. Anesthesiology’s articles are made freely accessible to all readers, for personal use only, 6 months from the cover date of the issue.
Article Information
Critical Care Medicine / Basic Science / Airway Management / Critical Care / Pharmacology / Respiratory System
Critical Care Medicine   |   January 2016
JM25-1, a Lidocaine Analog Combining Airway Relaxant and Antiinflammatory Properties: Implications for New Bronchospasm Therapy
Anesthesiology 1 2016, Vol.124, 109-120. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000919
Anesthesiology 1 2016, Vol.124, 109-120. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000919
Abstract

Background: Inhaled lidocaine antagonized bronchospasm in animal models and patients, but adverse effects limited its efficacy. This study evaluated the antibronchospasm potential of the analog JM25-1, exploring in vitro mechanisms and translation to an animal model.

Methods: The effectiveness of JM25-1 was assessed in GH3 cells, rat tracheal rings, mouse lymphocytes, and human eosinophil systems in vitro, assessing changes in Na+ current, contraction, proliferation, and survival, respectively. Lung function and inflammatory changes were studied in ovalbumin-sensitized mice.

Results: The efficacy of JM25-1 was higher than lidocaine in inhibiting carbachol-induced and calcium-induced tracheal contractions (maximum effect inhibition at 1 mM [%]: 67 ± 10 [JM25-1] vs. 41 ± 11 [lidocaine] [P < 0.001] for carbachol; 100 ± 3 [JM25-1] vs. 36 ± 26 [lidocaine] [P < 0.001] for Ca2+; mean ± SD; n = 9 each) but lower in Na+ current (50% inhibitory concentration = 151.5, n = 8 vs. 0.2 mM; n = 5; P < 0.001). JM25-1 also inhibited eosinophil survival (dead cells [%]: 65 ± 6; n = 4; P < 0.001 at 1 mM) and lymphocyte proliferation (cells in phase S + G2 [%]: 94 ± 10; n = 6; P < 0.001) at 0.6 mM. Aerosolized JM25-1 (1%) decreased lung eosinophil numbers from 13.2 ± 2.4 to 1.7 ± 0.7 × 104/μm2 (n = 6; P < 0.001) and neutrophils from 1.9 ± 0.4 to 0.2 ± 0.1 × 104/μm2 (n = 7; P < 0.001). Other parameters, including airway hyperreactivity, cytokines, mucus, and extracellular matrix deposition, were also sensitive to aerosolized JM25-1.

Conclusion: These findings highlight the potential of JM25-1, emphasizing its putative value in drug development for clinical conditions where there is bronchospasm.

Abstract

In comparison to lidocaine, JM25-1 was more effective in reducing bronchial smooth muscle constriction, airway hyperreactivity, lung inflammation, and peribronchial fibrosis. These data lend support for further investigation of the therapeutic potential of JM25-1 for the treatment of bronchospasm.

What We Already Know about This Topic
  • Lidocaine prevents bronchospasm in response to airway instrumentation. However, aerosolized lidocaine can also provoke bronchospasm by blocking sodium channels and attenuating bronchodilator neurogenic reflexes.

  • JM25-1, a novel lidocaine analog with limited sodium channel blockade, prevents airway hyperreactivity.

  • The mechanism of action of JM25-1 and its efficacy in reducing bronchospasm in an experimental model of pulmonary inflammation were evaluated.

What This Article Tells Us That Is New
  • In comparison to lidocaine, JM25-1 was more effective in reducing bronchial smooth muscle constriction, airway hyperreactivity, lung inflammation, and peribronchial fibrosis.

  • These data lend support for further investigation of the therapeutic potential of JM25-1 for the treatment of bronchospasm.

Bronchospasm is a frequent life-threatening perioperative event during general anesthesia, which can be triggered by pharmacologic and mechanic factors, particularly in those pathological conditions where there is airway inflammation and hyperreactivity.1  Lidocaine administered intravenously or via aerosol has been used to prevent irritant-induced bronchospasm during anesthesia in patients and animal models.2,3  However, in patients with a reactive airway disease such as asthma, aerosolized lidocaine can itself induce airway irritation and initial bronchoconstriction, indicating that caution in its use is required.4  When the airway effects of lidocaine and dyclonine (a lidocaine analog displaying longer-lasting and more intense local anesthetic activity) were compared in volunteers with bronchial hyperreactivity, it became clear that the attenuation of bronchospasm is independent of topical airway anesthesia because only lidocaine inhibited histamine-induced bronchoconstriction, whereas dyclonine showed a more intense irritant response.5 
Lidocaine acts as local anesthetic by blocking voltage-sensitive Na+ channels, which are responsible for Na+ permeability in excitable cells such as neurons and smooth muscle cells.6  Lidocaine is also known by its ability to inhibit the function of several inflammatory cells, including eosinophils and lymphocytes,7  paving the way for therapeutic uses to control chronic pulmonary diseases such as asthma. Preclinical8,9  and clinical10–14  studies have pointed out the effectiveness of aerosolized lidocaine for moderate and severe asthma conditions although discrepancies in clinical findings have been reported.15  In addition, some patients were found noncompliant by displaying adverse side effects, such as claustrophobic feelings and initial bronchospasm.10 
We previously demonstrated that aerosolized JMF2-1, which is a fluorinated lidocaine analog with reduced local anesthetic activity, prevented allergen-induced airway hyperreactivity and inhibited lung eosinophilia, in a mechanism associated with down-regulation of Th2 cytokines and T-cell function.16–18  Because fluorinated anilines have the potential to cause adverse side effects, such as hemolytic anemia and DNA damage,19,20  we questioned whether JM25-1 (2-diethylamino-N-2,5-dimethylphenyl acetamide), a nonfluorinated lidocaine analog with limited anesthetic activity,16  could inhibit bronchospasm and airway inflammation, and if so what might be the mechanism implicated. Thus, we hypothesized that nebulized JM25-1 is an alternative to obtain the bronchodilator and antiinflammatory effects of lidocaine without the anesthetic effect.
Accordingly, we demonstrated that JM25-1 is indeed a weak inhibitor of Na+ channels, but it antagonizes tracheal contraction triggered by distinct stimuli, and increases intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels in cultured smooth muscle cells. The effectiveness of this innovative compound was also attested in in vitro settings of eosinophil and lymphocyte functions as well as in an animal model in which airway inflammatory changes and respiratory mechanics were assessed.
Materials and Methods
All the procedures involving care and use of laboratory animals in this study were examined and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (license number: CEUA L-034/09). Human peripheral blood was obtained with informed consent from healthy donors under protocols approved by the Clementino Fraga Filho Hospital Committee on Clinical Investigation, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (protocol: 190/09).
GH3 Whole Cell Voltage Clamp Experiments
Rat clonal pituitary GH3 cells were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 U/ml), and streptomycin (100 mg/ml) and plated on a glass sheet at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. Ion channel currents in GH3 cells were recorded by patch clamp.21  The procedure applied to promote Na+ channel opening was similar to that described in the Materials and Methods section.17 
Isolated Tracheal Preparation and Measurement of Tension
The responses to carbachol of tracheal ring segments from naive Wistar rats (180 to 250 g) were performed as described previously.22  In brief, tissues were allowed to stabilize for 60 min, whereas the bathing solution was exchanged at 10-min intervals. At the end of the equilibration period, the response to carbachol (2.5 × 10−6 M) was recorded. Contractions were measured isometrically with a force-displacement transducer (Ugo Basile, Italy) and recorded by an Isolated Organs Data Acquisition program (Proto5; Letica Scientific Instruments, Spain). After carbachol washout and reestablishment of stable baseline tone, tissues were exposed to either carbachol (10−9 to 10−3 M) or calcium (10−3 to 103 mM) in the presence or absence of 1 mM lidocaine or 1 mM JM25-1. To further investigate the mechanism of action of JM25-1, the tracheal rings were pretreated 10 min before its application with 0.1 mM SQ22,536 (adenylate cyclase inhibitor).
For measurement of tension development after increasing Ca2+ extracellular concentration during high K+ depolarization, tissues were exposed to successive cycles of 100 mM KCl stimulations/washouts in Ca2+-free Krebs solution containing 2 mM ethyleneglycol-bis-(b-aminoethylether)-N,N,N9,N9-tetraacetic acid until complete desensitization to the 100 mM KCl-evoked contractile response. Next, tracheal rings were immersed in Ca2+-free Krebs solution containing 100 mM KCl, and the extracellular Ca2+ concentration was stepwise increased by the cumulative addition of Ca2+ (10−3 to 103 mM) in the presence or absence of either lidocaine or JM25-1 (1 mM). The preparations were preincubated with tested compounds 20 min before addition of the spasmodic agents. All responses were expressed as percentage of response to 2.5 × 10−6 M carbachol.
Measurement of Intracellular cAMP Levels in Airway Smooth Muscle Cells
Smooth muscle cells obtained from guinea pig tracheas were used to measure intracellular cAMP. After the third cell splitting, 106 cells per well were grown in 24-well plates. At confluence, monolayer cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and incubated with JM25-1 (0.1 to 1 mM) or 0.1 mM forskolin (adenylate cyclase activator) in the presence or absence of 0.1 mM SQ22,536 for 30 min. All incubations were done in the presence of 0.1 mM for 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (Sigma-Aldrich), a phosphodiesterase inhibitor. Lysed cells were collected and the cAMP was determined by using a radioimmunoassay kit (TRK 432–cyclic AMP[3H] Biotrak assay system; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, United Kingdom).18 
Ovalbumin Sensitization, Challenge, and Treatments
Four-week-old (weighing 18 to 20 g) A/J mice were kept in the animal housing facilities at a controlled room temperature (22° to 25°C) and a 12-h (6 am to 6 pm) light–dark cycle. The sample size (N = 6 to 7 per group) was based on our previous experience with this model. Mice were sensitized on day 0 and boosted 14 days later by a dorsal subcutaneous injection (200 μl) of a mixture containing 50 μg of ovalbumin (grade V; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) adsorbed to 5 mg of Al(OH)3 in sterile 0.9% NaCl (saline). Animals were challenged via intranasal instillation of either ovalbumin (25 μg/25 μl) or vehicle (saline) on days 19 and 20 postsensitization under halothane volatile anesthesia (Cristália, Brazil). A custom-designed dosing chamber was used to deliver JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%) or vehicle (saline) to the animals just after allergen challenge as described in the Materials and Methods section.8 
Invasive Assessment of Respiratory Mechanics
Tracheostomized mice were mechanically ventilated, and transpulmonary resistance and compliance were assessed 24 h after the last ovalbumin challenge by using invasive whole-body plethysmography (Buxco Electronics, USA).8  Mice were allowed to stabilize for 5 min and increasing concentrations of methacholine (3, 9, and 27 mg/ml) were aerosolized for 5 min each. Baseline pulmonary mechanics parameters were assessed with aerosolized phosphate-buffered saline.
Measurement of Pulmonary Inflammation, Mucus Production, and Peribronchiolar Fibrosis
Four-micrometer-thick lung sections were stained for eosinophils and neutrophils, mucus secretion, or extracellular matrix deposits as described in the Materials and Methods section.8  The slides were coded and the analyses were carried out in blind manner. The evaluations were made in an image analyzer system (Image-Pro® Plus, 4.1; Media Cybernetics, USA) using digitalized images obtained from a light microscope at a magnification of ×400.
Quantification of Cytokines and Eotaxin
The right lung lobes were removed, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C. Measurement of cytokine and chemokine proteins in whole-lung homogenates was performed by using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (interleukin [IL]-4, IL-5, and IL-13; DuoSet; R&D Systems, USA) and eotaxin-1 (R&D Systems). Results were expressed in picograms of cytokine per milligram of lung tissue.
Analyses of Apoptosis and T-cell Proliferation by Flow Cytometry
Pooled cervical, axial, and inguinal lymph node cells (106 per well) from A/J mice were stimulated with anti-CD3 (10 μg/ml) (BD Biosciences Pharmingen, USA) and treated with JM25-1 (0.1 to 0.6 mM) for 72 h (37°C aerated with 5% CO2). DNA content of retrieved cells was assessed as described in the Materials and Methods section.23  Analyses were performed by using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences PharMingen).
Purification and Analyses of Human Eosinophil Survival by Flow Cytometry
Blood eosinophils were isolated from healthy donors as previously described.24  The cells were then cultured in the presence of recombinant human IL-5 (30 ng/ml) (R&D Systems) and lidocaine (0.1 to 1 mM) or JM25-1 (0.1 to 1 mM) for 3 days followed by the addition of fluorescein isothiocyanate–labeled annexin V (1 μg/ml; BD Biosciences Pharmingen) and propidium iodide (1 μg/ml). Cells were immediately analyzed on the flow cytometer (FACScan with Cell Quest Software; BD Bioscience Pharmigen).
Western Blotting Analyses
After isolation, eosinophils were resuspended in 250 μl of Roswell Park Memorial Institute plus ovalbumin 0.1% (0.25 × 106 cells per sample). Thus, the cells were pretreated for 15 min with lidocaine (0.1 to 1 mM) or JM25-1 (0.1 to 1 mM) and stimulated by eotaxin (100 ng/ml) (R&D Systems) for 1 min. Eosinophil pellets were lysed in a 0.5% hexadecyl trimethylammonium bromide (Sigma-Aldrich) Tris buffer (10 mM, pH 7.4) containing 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM sodium fluoride, 20 mM Na4P2O7, 2 mM Na3VO4, 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, protease inhibitor (P8340, 1:100; Sigma-Aldrich), and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (P2850 and P5726, 1:100; Sigma-Aldrich). Lysates were loaded on 10% Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen, Brazil) under denaturing conditions. Gels were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Pierce, USA), blocked overnight with 5% bovine serum albumin, and probed with rabbit anti-human phospho-p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) polyclonal antibody that detects dually phosphorylated Thr-180 and Tyr-182 (1:200 dilution, 9211; Cell Signaling, USA). Membranes were reprobed with rabbit anti-human p38 MAPK polyclonal antibodies; 1:500 dilution (9212; Cell Signaling). Goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase; 1:15,000 dilution (Jackson ImmunoResearch, USA) were used. For Western blotting analyses regarding the in vivo assays, lung-homogenized samples with equal protein concentration (50 μg) were separated on 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate gel electrophoresis and electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked overnight with 5% nonfat dry milk and incubated with the primary antibody (anti-GATA-3, 1:1,000 dilution, sc-268 [Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA], or phosphor-p38 [1:1,000 dilution; 4515S; Cell Signaling] and β-actin [1:1,000 dilution, sc-47778; Santa Cruz Biotechnology]) for 2 h. Membranes were then incubated with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (at 1:3,000; Calbiochem, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Protein bands were detected by using an electrochemiluminescence plus Western blotting detection system. Western blotting images were analyzed by densitometry using Gelplot analysis macros in Scion Image Software, version 4.03 (Scion Corporation, USA).
Statistical Analysis
Values were shown as mean ± SD or median and interquartile range. Statistical analyses were performed by using GraphPad Prism Software, version 5.0 (USA). Concerning normally distributed data, analyses were done with one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test or two-way ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni correction. When variables were nonnormally distributed, data were analyzed by using a nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test with a post hoc Dunn test. Statistical differences were considered significant if P values were less than 0.05 (two-tailed tests). Concentration–response curves were fitted by nonlinear regression using log (inhibitor) versus response–variable slope for patch clamp data and nonlinear regression using log (agonist) versus response–variable slope for tracheal ring contraction data.
Results
JM25-1 Potency in Inhibiting Na+ Channels Is Attenuated When Compared with Lidocaine
To compare the effectiveness of lidocaine and JM25-1 (chemical structures shown in fig. 1A) in blocking voltage-gated Na+ channels, we performed a patch clamp analysis by using the GH3 cell lineage as target. As expected, a blockade of Na+ currents was observed after exposure to increasing concentrations of lidocaine in the range from 10−5 to 10−3 M, with a 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 0.2 mM. Higher concentrations of JM25-1 were required for blockade of Na+ currents in GH3 cells, resulting in a 758-fold higher IC50 value for the analog (IC50 = 151.5 mM) (fig. 1B).
Fig. 1.
(A) Chemical structures of lidocaine and JM25-1. (B) Concentration-dependent inhibition of Na+ currents in GH3 cells by lidocaine (circles) and JM25-1 (triangles). Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 8 for JM25-1 and n = 5 for lidocaine); 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were calculated by a fitting concentration–response relation to a sigmoidal model of the form log (inhibitor) versus response–variable slope.
(A) Chemical structures of lidocaine and JM25-1. (B) Concentration-dependent inhibition of Na+ currents in GH3 cells by lidocaine (circles) and JM25-1 (triangles). Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 8 for JM25-1 and n = 5 for lidocaine); 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were calculated by a fitting concentration–response relation to a sigmoidal model of the form log (inhibitor) versus response–variable slope.
Fig. 1.
(A) Chemical structures of lidocaine and JM25-1. (B) Concentration-dependent inhibition of Na+ currents in GH3 cells by lidocaine (circles) and JM25-1 (triangles). Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 8 for JM25-1 and n = 5 for lidocaine); 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were calculated by a fitting concentration–response relation to a sigmoidal model of the form log (inhibitor) versus response–variable slope.
×
Effectiveness of JM25-1 Is Greater Than That of Lidocaine in Inhibiting Rat Tracheal Contractions
We noted that both lidocaine and JM25-1 inhibited tracheal contraction triggered by cumulative addition of increasing concentrations of carbachol (fig. 2A). As shown in figure 2B, area under the curve (AUC) values for the carbachol concentration–response curves reduced from 374 ± 66 (control) to 190 ± 49 (1 mM lidocaine) (P < 0.001) and 109 ± 34 (1 mM JM25-1) (P < 0.001) (n = 9; mean ± SD). As shown in figure 2C, lidocaine and JM25-1 also inhibited Ca2+-induced tracheal contraction. AUC values for the Ca2+ concentration–response curves reduced from 128 ± 38 (control) to 77 ± 27 (1 mM lidocaine) (P < 0.001) and 8 ± 3 (1 mM JM25-1) (P < 0.001) (n = 9; mean ± SD), as indicated in figure 2D.
Fig. 2.
Effect of lidocaine (squares) and JM25-1 (triangles) on rat tracheal contraction induced by carbachol (10−9 to 10−3 M) (A) or calcium (10−3 to 103 M) (C). Open circles represent control curves. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 9 for all groups), and results were expressed as a percentage of contractile responses induced by 2.5 μM carbachol. Curves were fitted using a sigmoidal model of the form log (agonist) versus response–variable slope. Differences among groups were analyzed as area under the curve (AUC) values by using one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls (B and D). ***P < 0.001 versus tracheal responses from untreated preparations (control); ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 versus lidocaine group.
Effect of lidocaine (squares) and JM25-1 (triangles) on rat tracheal contraction induced by carbachol (10−9 to 10−3 M) (A) or calcium (10−3 to 103 M) (C). Open circles represent control curves. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 9 for all groups), and results were expressed as a percentage of contractile responses induced by 2.5 μM carbachol. Curves were fitted using a sigmoidal model of the form log (agonist) versus response–variable slope. Differences among groups were analyzed as area under the curve (AUC) values by using one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls (B and D). ***P < 0.001 versus tracheal responses from untreated preparations (control); ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 versus lidocaine group.
Fig. 2.
Effect of lidocaine (squares) and JM25-1 (triangles) on rat tracheal contraction induced by carbachol (10−9 to 10−3 M) (A) or calcium (10−3 to 103 M) (C). Open circles represent control curves. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 9 for all groups), and results were expressed as a percentage of contractile responses induced by 2.5 μM carbachol. Curves were fitted using a sigmoidal model of the form log (agonist) versus response–variable slope. Differences among groups were analyzed as area under the curve (AUC) values by using one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls (B and D). ***P < 0.001 versus tracheal responses from untreated preparations (control); ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 versus lidocaine group.
×
The Adenylyl Cyclase Inhibitor SQ22,536 Attenuates JM25-1 Effects on Tracheal Smooth Muscle Cells
Preincubation of the adenylate cyclase inhibitor SQ22,536 (0.1 mM) did not alter carbachol-induced tracheal contraction but attenuated the protective effect evidenced by 1 mM JM25-1 (fig. 3A). As shown in figure 3B, AUC values increased from 118 ± 34 (carbachol + JM25-1) to 169 ± 20 (carbachol + JM25-1 + SQ22,536) (P < 0.001) (n = 7, each group).
Fig. 3.
Effect of SQ22,536 on the tracheal smooth muscle relaxant and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)–increasing properties presented by JM25-1. (A) Effect of 0.1 mM SQ22,536 on carbachol-induced tracheal contraction performed in the absence and presence of 1 mM JM25-1. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). Curves were fitted by using a sigmoidal model of the form log (agonist) versus response–variable slope. Differences among groups were analyzed as area under the curve (AUC) using one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls (B). ***P < 0.001 as compared with tracheal responses from untreated preparations (control), #P < 0.05 when compared with JM25-1 group. (C) Effect of JM25-1 (0.1 to 1 mM) treatment on guinea pig tracheal smooth muscle cell cAMP intracellular levels. Data are expressed as median (n = 3). *P < 0.05 versus untreated cells, #P < 0.05 versus 1 mM JM25-1 group, Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn multiple comparison test.
Effect of SQ22,536 on the tracheal smooth muscle relaxant and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)–increasing properties presented by JM25-1. (A) Effect of 0.1 mM SQ22,536 on carbachol-induced tracheal contraction performed in the absence and presence of 1 mM JM25-1. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). Curves were fitted by using a sigmoidal model of the form log (agonist) versus response–variable slope. Differences among groups were analyzed as area under the curve (AUC) using one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls (B). ***P < 0.001 as compared with tracheal responses from untreated preparations (control), #P < 0.05 when compared with JM25-1 group. (C) Effect of JM25-1 (0.1 to 1 mM) treatment on guinea pig tracheal smooth muscle cell cAMP intracellular levels. Data are expressed as median (n = 3). *P < 0.05 versus untreated cells, #P < 0.05 versus 1 mM JM25-1 group, Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn multiple comparison test.
Fig. 3.
Effect of SQ22,536 on the tracheal smooth muscle relaxant and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)–increasing properties presented by JM25-1. (A) Effect of 0.1 mM SQ22,536 on carbachol-induced tracheal contraction performed in the absence and presence of 1 mM JM25-1. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). Curves were fitted by using a sigmoidal model of the form log (agonist) versus response–variable slope. Differences among groups were analyzed as area under the curve (AUC) using one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls (B). ***P < 0.001 as compared with tracheal responses from untreated preparations (control), #P < 0.05 when compared with JM25-1 group. (C) Effect of JM25-1 (0.1 to 1 mM) treatment on guinea pig tracheal smooth muscle cell cAMP intracellular levels. Data are expressed as median (n = 3). *P < 0.05 versus untreated cells, #P < 0.05 versus 1 mM JM25-1 group, Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn multiple comparison test.
×
We then investigated a putative action of JM25-1 on intracellular levels of cAMP, a signaling pathway known to be involved in smooth muscle relaxation.25  As shown in figure 3C, JM25-1 concentration-dependently (0.01 to 1 mM) increased intracellular cAMP levels in cultured tracheal smooth muscle cells, achieving at the highest concentration values comparable to that of 0.1 mM forskolin, a known adenylyl cyclase activator. In addition, SQ22,536 inhibited the up-regulation of cAMP levels triggered by JM25-1(fig. 3C).
Aerosolized JM25-1 Inhibits Allergen-induced Airway Hyperreactivity
In attempt to investigate whether the smooth muscle relaxant effects of JM25-1 noted in vitro could be translated into in vivo settings, we performed invasive measurements of airway resistance and lung dynamic compliance responses to inhaled methacholine 24 h after the last ovalbumin provocation. As shown in figure 4A, aerosolized JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%), once a day for 2 days, immediately after ovalbumin challenge, significantly inhibited the state of airway hyperreactivity mainly concerning lung resistance changes. For lung compliance changes, statistically significant values were obtained only for the lowest concentration of methacholine, despite the tendency to return to baseline levels in all doses of methacholine (fig. 4B).
Fig. 4.
Effect of nebulized JM25-1 on methacholine-induced changes in transpulmonary resistance (A) and dynamic compliance (B) in A/J mice sensitized and challenged with ovalbumin (OVA). Ovalbumin-challenged mice were treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%) or vehicle. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). §P < 0.05 versus saline group; *P < 0.05 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, two-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Effect of nebulized JM25-1 on methacholine-induced changes in transpulmonary resistance (A) and dynamic compliance (B) in A/J mice sensitized and challenged with ovalbumin (OVA). Ovalbumin-challenged mice were treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%) or vehicle. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). §P < 0.05 versus saline group; *P < 0.05 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, two-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Fig. 4.
Effect of nebulized JM25-1 on methacholine-induced changes in transpulmonary resistance (A) and dynamic compliance (B) in A/J mice sensitized and challenged with ovalbumin (OVA). Ovalbumin-challenged mice were treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%) or vehicle. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). §P < 0.05 versus saline group; *P < 0.05 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, two-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
×
Aerosolized JM25-1 Inhibits Allergen-induced Inflammation, Mucus Production, and Fibrogenesis
To access the putative effect of aerosolized JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%) on lung inflammatory changes triggered by allergen provocation, we have quantified peribronchiolar eosinophil and neutrophil numbers 24 h after the last provocation. The histologic analysis of the leukocyte infiltrate revealed that the JM25-1 inhibited peribronchiolar eosinophil and neutrophil infiltration in a dose-dependent manner (fig. 5, A–E). It also inhibited allergen-induced mucus exacerbation (fig. 6A) and peribronchiolar collagen deposition (fig. 6B). In another setting of experiments, we demonstrated that aerosolized JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%) also inhibited the increased levels of eotaxin-1 (fig. 7A) and the Th2 cytokines IL-4 (fig. 7B), IL-5 (fig. 7C), and IL-13 (fig. 7D), in lung tissue homogenates of ovalbumin-challenged mice, in parallel with down-regulation of GATA-3 (fig. 7E) and phosphorylated p38 expression (fig. 7F).
Fig. 5.
Nebulized JM25-1 reduces allergen-induced pulmonary inflammation in A/J mice sensitized and challenged with ovalbumin (OVA). (AC) Photomicrographs of paraffin-embedded Sirius Red–stained lung sections from ovalbumin-sensitized mice challenged with saline, challenged with ovalbumin, and challenged with ovalbumin and treated with 1% JM25-1, respectively. The number of eosinophils (D) and neutrophils (E) in peribronchiolar regions was determined in lung sections by morphometric analyses. Black and white arrows indicate representative eosinophils and neutrophils, respectively. Ovalbumin-challenged mice were treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%), and all samples for histologic examinations were undertaken 24 h after the last ovalbumin challenge. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). §P < 0.001 versus saline group, ***P < 0.001 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test. BR = bronchioles.
Nebulized JM25-1 reduces allergen-induced pulmonary inflammation in A/J mice sensitized and challenged with ovalbumin (OVA). (A–C) Photomicrographs of paraffin-embedded Sirius Red–stained lung sections from ovalbumin-sensitized mice challenged with saline, challenged with ovalbumin, and challenged with ovalbumin and treated with 1% JM25-1, respectively. The number of eosinophils (D) and neutrophils (E) in peribronchiolar regions was determined in lung sections by morphometric analyses. Black and white arrows indicate representative eosinophils and neutrophils, respectively. Ovalbumin-challenged mice were treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%), and all samples for histologic examinations were undertaken 24 h after the last ovalbumin challenge. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). §P < 0.001 versus saline group, ***P < 0.001 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test. BR = bronchioles.
Fig. 5.
Nebulized JM25-1 reduces allergen-induced pulmonary inflammation in A/J mice sensitized and challenged with ovalbumin (OVA). (AC) Photomicrographs of paraffin-embedded Sirius Red–stained lung sections from ovalbumin-sensitized mice challenged with saline, challenged with ovalbumin, and challenged with ovalbumin and treated with 1% JM25-1, respectively. The number of eosinophils (D) and neutrophils (E) in peribronchiolar regions was determined in lung sections by morphometric analyses. Black and white arrows indicate representative eosinophils and neutrophils, respectively. Ovalbumin-challenged mice were treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%), and all samples for histologic examinations were undertaken 24 h after the last ovalbumin challenge. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). §P < 0.001 versus saline group, ***P < 0.001 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test. BR = bronchioles.
×
Fig. 6.
Nebulized JM25-1 reduces airway remodeling caused by allergen-induced lung inflammation in mice. Quantitative assessment of mucus production (A) and fibrotic changes (B) was carried out in lung sections by morphometric analyses. All histologic examinations were undertaken 24 h after the last ovalbumin (OVA) challenge. Ovalbumin-challenged mice were treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%), and all samples for histologic examinations were obtained 24 h after the last ovalbumin challenge. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). §P < 0.001 versus saline group, ***P < 0.001 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test. PAS = periodic acid–Schiff.
Nebulized JM25-1 reduces airway remodeling caused by allergen-induced lung inflammation in mice. Quantitative assessment of mucus production (A) and fibrotic changes (B) was carried out in lung sections by morphometric analyses. All histologic examinations were undertaken 24 h after the last ovalbumin (OVA) challenge. Ovalbumin-challenged mice were treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%), and all samples for histologic examinations were obtained 24 h after the last ovalbumin challenge. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). §P < 0.001 versus saline group, ***P < 0.001 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test. PAS = periodic acid–Schiff.
Fig. 6.
Nebulized JM25-1 reduces airway remodeling caused by allergen-induced lung inflammation in mice. Quantitative assessment of mucus production (A) and fibrotic changes (B) was carried out in lung sections by morphometric analyses. All histologic examinations were undertaken 24 h after the last ovalbumin (OVA) challenge. Ovalbumin-challenged mice were treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%), and all samples for histologic examinations were obtained 24 h after the last ovalbumin challenge. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). §P < 0.001 versus saline group, ***P < 0.001 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test. PAS = periodic acid–Schiff.
×
Fig. 7.
Nebulized JM25-1 reduces proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine levels and GATA-3 and phosphorylated p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) expression in lung tissue samples. Levels of eotaxin-1 (CCL11) (A), interleukin (IL)-4 (B), IL-5 (C), and IL-13 (D) were measured in lung homogenates by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in ovalbumin (OVA)-challenged mice treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%). n = 6 to 7 in each group. Whole-lung extract was analyzed by Western blotting for GATA-3 (E) and phosphorylated p38 MAPK expression (F). The membranes were reprobed with anti-actin or p38 as the loading controls, respectively (one of the three independent experiments with similar results is shown). Intensity of GATA-3 and phosphorylated p38 MAPK expression was quantified by densitometry and presented as relative intensity of GATA-3 with respect to actin or relative intensity of phosphorylated p38 MAPK (pp38) with respect to total p38 MAPK (p38). Results are represented as whiskers: minimum to maximum (A–D) and mean ± SD (E–F). §§§P < 0.001 versus saline group; **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Nebulized JM25-1 reduces proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine levels and GATA-3 and phosphorylated p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) expression in lung tissue samples. Levels of eotaxin-1 (CCL11) (A), interleukin (IL)-4 (B), IL-5 (C), and IL-13 (D) were measured in lung homogenates by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in ovalbumin (OVA)-challenged mice treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%). n = 6 to 7 in each group. Whole-lung extract was analyzed by Western blotting for GATA-3 (E) and phosphorylated p38 MAPK expression (F). The membranes were reprobed with anti-actin or p38 as the loading controls, respectively (one of the three independent experiments with similar results is shown). Intensity of GATA-3 and phosphorylated p38 MAPK expression was quantified by densitometry and presented as relative intensity of GATA-3 with respect to actin or relative intensity of phosphorylated p38 MAPK (pp38) with respect to total p38 MAPK (p38). Results are represented as whiskers: minimum to maximum (A–D) and mean ± SD (E–F). §§§P < 0.001 versus saline group; **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Fig. 7.
Nebulized JM25-1 reduces proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine levels and GATA-3 and phosphorylated p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) expression in lung tissue samples. Levels of eotaxin-1 (CCL11) (A), interleukin (IL)-4 (B), IL-5 (C), and IL-13 (D) were measured in lung homogenates by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in ovalbumin (OVA)-challenged mice treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%). n = 6 to 7 in each group. Whole-lung extract was analyzed by Western blotting for GATA-3 (E) and phosphorylated p38 MAPK expression (F). The membranes were reprobed with anti-actin or p38 as the loading controls, respectively (one of the three independent experiments with similar results is shown). Intensity of GATA-3 and phosphorylated p38 MAPK expression was quantified by densitometry and presented as relative intensity of GATA-3 with respect to actin or relative intensity of phosphorylated p38 MAPK (pp38) with respect to total p38 MAPK (p38). Results are represented as whiskers: minimum to maximum (A–D) and mean ± SD (E–F). §§§P < 0.001 versus saline group; **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
×
JM25-1 Induces Apoptosis and Prevents Eotaxin-induced p38 MAPK Phosphorylation in Isolated Human Eosinophils
Because eosinophils are leukocytes notably associated with bronchial reactive diseases, we next evaluated the effect of JM25-1 on isolated human eosinophils. By flow cytometry, we found that JM25-1 (0.1 to 1 mM) concentration-dependently promoted eosinophil apoptosis (fig. 8A) as assessed after annexin V and propidium iodide labeling. The response was apparent at 0.1 mM but achieved significant levels at 0.6 mM and peaked at 1 mM JM25-1. In contrast, the population of apoptotic eosinophils after exposure to 1 mM lidocaine was lower than 20% (fig. 8B).
Fig. 8.
JM25-1 induced apoptosis of isolated human peripheral eosinophils. Eosinophils were cultured in the presence of interleukin-5 (30 ng/ml) for 72 h in the absence or presence of lidocaine or JM25-1. Column scatter graphs represent the percentage of cells in apoptosis. Eosinophils were treated with JM25-1 at 0.1 to 1 mM (A) or lidocaine (B). Horizontal lines represent the mean value and the open circles represent the median (n = 4, four different eosinophil donors). Results were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Dunn multiple comparison test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 versus untreated group.
JM25-1 induced apoptosis of isolated human peripheral eosinophils. Eosinophils were cultured in the presence of interleukin-5 (30 ng/ml) for 72 h in the absence or presence of lidocaine or JM25-1. Column scatter graphs represent the percentage of cells in apoptosis. Eosinophils were treated with JM25-1 at 0.1 to 1 mM (A) or lidocaine (B). Horizontal lines represent the mean value and the open circles represent the median (n = 4, four different eosinophil donors). Results were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Dunn multiple comparison test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 versus untreated group.
Fig. 8.
JM25-1 induced apoptosis of isolated human peripheral eosinophils. Eosinophils were cultured in the presence of interleukin-5 (30 ng/ml) for 72 h in the absence or presence of lidocaine or JM25-1. Column scatter graphs represent the percentage of cells in apoptosis. Eosinophils were treated with JM25-1 at 0.1 to 1 mM (A) or lidocaine (B). Horizontal lines represent the mean value and the open circles represent the median (n = 4, four different eosinophil donors). Results were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Dunn multiple comparison test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 versus untreated group.
×
Then, we performed another set of experiments evaluating the ability of JM25-1 in preventing eotaxin-induced eosinophil activation. By Western blotting, we found that both JM25-1 (fig. 9A) and lidocaine (fig. 9B) inhibited the phosphorylation of p38 MAPK after eotaxin stimulation at 1 mM concentration.
Fig. 9.
JM25-1 prevented eotaxin-induced p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphorylation in human eosinophils. Isolated human peripheral eosinophils were pretreated or not with JM25-1 (0.1 to 1 mM) (A) or lidocaine (0.1 to 1 mM) (B) for 15 min and stimulated with eotaxin (100 ng/ml, 1 min). Cell lysates were analyzed by Western blotting for phosphorylated p38 MAPK expression. The membrane was reprobed with anti-p38 as the loading control, respectively (the images represent one of the three independent experiments with similar results). Column scatter graphs represent the densitometry analysis of the bands presented as relative intensity of phosphorylated p38 MAPK (pp38) with respect to total p38 MAPK (p38). Horizontal lines represent the mean values (n = 3, three different eosinophil donors). Results were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Dunn multiple comparison test. §P < 0.05 versus untreated group, *P < 0.05 versus eotaxin-stimulated group not treated with JM25-1 or lidocaine.
JM25-1 prevented eotaxin-induced p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphorylation in human eosinophils. Isolated human peripheral eosinophils were pretreated or not with JM25-1 (0.1 to 1 mM) (A) or lidocaine (0.1 to 1 mM) (B) for 15 min and stimulated with eotaxin (100 ng/ml, 1 min). Cell lysates were analyzed by Western blotting for phosphorylated p38 MAPK expression. The membrane was reprobed with anti-p38 as the loading control, respectively (the images represent one of the three independent experiments with similar results). Column scatter graphs represent the densitometry analysis of the bands presented as relative intensity of phosphorylated p38 MAPK (pp38) with respect to total p38 MAPK (p38). Horizontal lines represent the mean values (n = 3, three different eosinophil donors). Results were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Dunn multiple comparison test. §P < 0.05 versus untreated group, *P < 0.05 versus eotaxin-stimulated group not treated with JM25-1 or lidocaine.
Fig. 9.
JM25-1 prevented eotaxin-induced p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphorylation in human eosinophils. Isolated human peripheral eosinophils were pretreated or not with JM25-1 (0.1 to 1 mM) (A) or lidocaine (0.1 to 1 mM) (B) for 15 min and stimulated with eotaxin (100 ng/ml, 1 min). Cell lysates were analyzed by Western blotting for phosphorylated p38 MAPK expression. The membrane was reprobed with anti-p38 as the loading control, respectively (the images represent one of the three independent experiments with similar results). Column scatter graphs represent the densitometry analysis of the bands presented as relative intensity of phosphorylated p38 MAPK (pp38) with respect to total p38 MAPK (p38). Horizontal lines represent the mean values (n = 3, three different eosinophil donors). Results were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Dunn multiple comparison test. §P < 0.05 versus untreated group, *P < 0.05 versus eotaxin-stimulated group not treated with JM25-1 or lidocaine.
×
JM25-1 Induces Apoptosis and Inhibits Proliferation of T Cells In Vitro
Lymph node cells exposed to anti-CD3 provocation in the presence or absence of JM25-1 were permeabilized, stained with propidium iodide, and analyzed by flow cytometry. As expected, stimulation of untreated cells with anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody increased the number of cells in the phase of DNA synthesis or replication (cells in S + G2) (fig. 10A) and decreased the apoptotic cell numbers (cells in sub-G0) (fig. 10B). As shown in the same figures, pretreatment with JM25-1 (0.1 to 0.6 mM) concentration-dependently decreased the proliferative response and increased the percentage of apoptotic cells stimulated by anti-CD3 in vitro.
Fig. 10.
Effect of JM25-1 on proliferation (A) and the subdiploid DNA (sub-G0/G1) content (B) of lymph node cells recovered from A/J mice subjected to in vitro stimulation with anti-CD3. The percentage of cells undergoing DNA fragmentation was determined by propidium iodide staining (flow cytometry) performed within 72 h after exposure to anti-CD3. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). §P < 0.05 versus saline-stimulated cells. *P < 0.05 versus anti-CD3-stimulated but untreated cells, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Effect of JM25-1 on proliferation (A) and the subdiploid DNA (sub-G0/G1) content (B) of lymph node cells recovered from A/J mice subjected to in vitro stimulation with anti-CD3. The percentage of cells undergoing DNA fragmentation was determined by propidium iodide staining (flow cytometry) performed within 72 h after exposure to anti-CD3. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). §P < 0.05 versus saline-stimulated cells. *P < 0.05 versus anti-CD3-stimulated but untreated cells, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Fig. 10.
Effect of JM25-1 on proliferation (A) and the subdiploid DNA (sub-G0/G1) content (B) of lymph node cells recovered from A/J mice subjected to in vitro stimulation with anti-CD3. The percentage of cells undergoing DNA fragmentation was determined by propidium iodide staining (flow cytometry) performed within 72 h after exposure to anti-CD3. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). §P < 0.05 versus saline-stimulated cells. *P < 0.05 versus anti-CD3-stimulated but untreated cells, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
×
Discussion
This study shows that JM25-1, a novel lidocaine analog with limited impact on Na+ channels, is more effective than lidocaine in inhibiting carbachol-induced and Ca2+-induced rat tracheal contraction in a mechanism, at least partially, mediated by increase in intracellular cAMP levels and the inhibition of Ca2+ influx. Furthermore, allergen-induced airway hyperreactivity, lung eosinophilic inflammation, mucus production, and peribronchial fibrosis can be prevented by aerosolized JM25-1 in actively sensitized mice.
The experiments reported here derive from earlier observations showing that lidocaine prevents bronchospasm caused by distinct stimuli, such as airway instrumentation for general anesthesia or bronchoscopy and many others.2,3  This effect is in part related to the fact that lidocaine can directly relax airway smooth muscle.26–28  However, this alternative application of local anesthetics has to be used with caution because anesthesia of the airways can cause airway irritation and initial bronchoconstriction mediated by blockade of bronchodilator neurogenic reflexes.4,29  The purpose of this study was to assess the potential of a novel lidocaine analog, JM25-1, to minimize anesthesia-related adverse effects while improving the antibronchospasm activity achievable with lidocaine.
We noted that the concentration of JM25-1 required to block Na+ currents in GH3 cells was 758-fold higher than that of lidocaine. These data are supported by prior findings, which revealed the weak capacity of this analog to anesthetize cutaneous sites.16  While comparing the effect of these agents in inhibiting tracheal contractions, we found that the efficacy of JM25-1 to reduce carbachol-induced maximal response was significantly greater than that of lidocaine. Lidocaine inhibits bronchospasmodic reflexes in a mechanism that has been associated with direct relaxation of airway smooth muscle.26,30  The effect is mediated by reduction on Ca2+ influx, Ca2+ release from intracellular stores, and Ca2+ sensitivity of myofilament in case of acetylcholine stimulation.26  It is noteworthy that the efficacy of JM25-1 in reducing the maximal effect, in comparison to lidocaine, was even more pronounced when extracellularly applied Ca2+ under high K+ depolarization triggered the contractile response. This result is consistent with the interpretation that, similar to lidocaine, the analog inhibits the influx of extracellular Ca2+via L-type Ca2+ channel blockade. Moreover, neither lidocaine nor JM25-1 seem to act as a muscarinic receptor antagonist as attested by the decrease in carbachol-induced maximal response and the nonparallel shift of the dose–response curve.
It is well established that increased cAMP is closely associated with smooth muscle relaxation.25  Lidocaine failed to augment intracellular levels of cAMP, but it attenuates muscarinic receptor-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase in airway smooth muscle.31  Because JM25-1 effect was attenuated when tracheal rings were pretreated with the adenylate cyclase inhibitor SQ22,536, we next investigated a likely up-regulation by JM25-1 of intracellular cAMP levels in smooth muscle cells. Differently from lidocaine,31  JM25-1 increased the intracellular basal levels of cAMP in smooth muscle cells derived from guinea pig trachea. In addition, the phenomenon was markedly inhibited by coincubation with SQ22,536. These findings support the interpretation that the antispasmodic effect of JM25-1 is probably accounted for by at least two distinct mechanisms: increase in intracellular cAMP levels and Ca2+ influx impairment in respiratory smooth muscle cells.
As an attempt to access whether the in vitro potency and efficacy in down-regulating respiratory smooth muscle contraction could be translated into in vivo settings, JM25-1 was tested by nebulization in a well-established animal model of allergic pulmonary inflammation.8  We showed that allergen-induced peribronchiolar eosinophil infiltration, mucus exacerbation, and collagen deposition were drastically impaired by nebulization of JM25-1. Airway hyperreactivity, a prominent clinical symptom in asthma, was also inhibited. Notably, the in vivo efficacy of JM25-1 was very similar to that of lidocaine in the same animal model,8  despite the fact that the analog is much less effective in blocking Na+ channels and presented a markedly attenuated anesthetic activity.16  It is, therefore, quite unlikely that JM25-1 works by inhibiting neural regulation of allergic inflammation, the most obvious mechanistic hypothesis regarding the pharmacology of lidocaine.32,33 
In the literature, there are many pieces of evidence indicating that local anesthetics have indeed actions beyond local anesthesia and Na+ channel blockade.28,34–36  For instance, in vivo and in vitro investigations revealed that lidocaine can inhibit the expression of GATA-3,8  a pivotal transcription factor expressed in several immune-competent cells, necessary and sufficient for Th2 cytokine gene expression.37  Similar to lidocaine, JM25-1 also reduced the expression of GATA-3 in lung tissue samples recovered from allergen-challenged mice, in line with decrease in the levels of several proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines after allergen provocation. In parallel, JM25-1 also reduced the expression of phosphorylated p38 in the lung of asthmatic mice. Notably, phosphorylation of p38 MAPK is a relevant event in the signaling cascade of eotaxin-induced eosinophil activation.38,39 
We then examined the putative direct impact of JM25-1 on survival and activation of eosinophils and Th2 cells. Apoptosis of eosinophils and Th2 lymphocytes is an endpoint that may promote resolution of inflammation in asthma and other bronchial reactive diseases.40,41  In prior studies, human eosinophil survival and activation were shown to be susceptible to lidocaine in vitro.42  The viability of CD4+ T cells obtained from asthmatics were not modified, but their proliferative response and ability to produce Th2 cytokines were clearly inhibited by lidocaine in vitro.43  In our conditions, the potency and efficacy of JM25-1 to induce apoptosis of human eosinophils were undoubtedly higher than that of lidocaine, whereas its ability to inhibit eotaxin-induced activation of p38 MAPK appeared to be comparable. Moreover, JM25-1 dose-dependently inhibited anti-CD3-induced proliferation of mouse T cells and pushed them to apoptosis, adding support to the interpretation that JM25-1 has indeed potential to benefit patients with lung inflammatory diseases such as asthma.
In conclusion, JM25-1, a lidocaine analog with limited impact on Na+ channels and beneficial effects on airway smooth muscle and lung inflammation, holds promising perspectives as an alternative for treating life-threatening conditions marked by airway hyperreactivity and bronchoconstriction.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Luciana P. Coelho, Ph.D., Nathalia de Andrade Guimarães, B.Sc., Ana C. S. Arantes, M.Sc., and Rodrigo Bandeira de Azevedo, B.Sc., Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, for their technical support.
This study was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Brasília, Brazil; Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia-INOFAR (INCT-INOFAR), Rio de Janeiro and Brasília, Brazil; Programa de Núcleos de Excelência CNPq/FAPERJ (PRONEX), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; and European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (grant no. HEALTH-F4-2011–281608), Brussels, Belgium.
Competing Interests
Drs. Martins and Costa are coinventors in a patent addressing application of JM25-1 for asthma treatment. The other authors declare no competing interests.
References
Dewachter, P, Mouton-Faivre, C, Emala, CW, Beloucif, S Case scenario: Bronchospasm during anesthetic induction.. Anesthesiology. (2011). 114 1200–10 [Article] [PubMed]
Nishino, T, Hiraga, K, Sugimori, K Effects of i.v. lignocaine on airway reflexes elicited by irritation of the tracheal mucosa in humans anaesthetized with enflurane.. Br J Anaesth. (1990). 64 682–7 [Article] [PubMed]
Cross, BA, Guz, A, Jain, SK, Archer, S, Stevens, J, Reynolds, F The effect of anaesthesia of the airway in dog and man: A study of respiratory reflexes, sensations and lung mechanics.. Clin Sci Mol Med. (1976). 50 439–54 [PubMed]
Miller, WC, Awe, R Effect of nebulized lidocaine on reactive airways.. Am Rev Respir Dis. (1975). 111 739–41 [PubMed]
Groeben, H, Grosswendt, T, Silvanus, MT, Pavlakovic, G, Peters, J Airway anesthesia alone does not explain attenuation of histamine-induced bronchospasm by local anesthetics: A comparison of lidocaine, ropivacaine, and dyclonine.. Anesthesiology. (2001). 94 423–8; discussion 5A [Article] [PubMed]
Tetzlaff, JE The pharmacology of local anesthetics.. Anesthesiol Clin North America. (2000). 18 217–33, v [Article] [PubMed]
Hollmann, MW, Durieux, ME Local anesthetics and the inflammatory response: A new therapeutic indication?. Anesthesiology. (2000). 93 858–75 [Article] [PubMed]
Serra, MF, Anjos-Valotta, EA, Olsen, PC, Couto, GC, Jurgilas, PB, Cotias, AC, Pão, CR, Ferreira, TP, Arantes, AC, Pires, AL, Cordeiro, RS, Silva, PM, Martins, MA Nebulized lidocaine prevents airway inflammation, peribronchial fibrosis, and mucus production in a murine model of asthma.. Anesthesiology. (2012). 117 580–91 [Article] [PubMed]
Muraki, M, Iwanaga, T, Haraguchi, R, Kubo, H, Tohda, Y Continued inhalation of lidocaine suppresses antigen-induced airway hyperreactivity and airway inflammation in ovalbumin-sensitized guinea pigs.. Int Immunopharmacol. (2008). 8 725–31 [Article] [PubMed]
Hunt, LW, Frigas, E, Butterfield, JH, Kita, H, Blomgren, J, Dunnette, SL, Offord, KP, Gleich, GJ Treatment of asthma with nebulized lidocaine: A randomized, placebo-controlled study.. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2004). 113 853–9 [Article] [PubMed]
Rosario, NA, Riedi, CA, Farias, L Lidocaine nebulization for treatment of asthma.. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. (2000). 85 245–6 [Article] [PubMed]
Decco, ML, Neeno, TA, Hunt, LW, O’Connell, EJ, Yunginger, JW, Sachs, MI Nebulized lidocaine in the treatment of severe asthma in children: A pilot study.. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. (1999). 82 29–32 [Article] [PubMed]
Ohnishi, T, Kita, H, Mayeno, AN, Okada, S, Sur, S, Broide, DH, Gleich, GJ Lidocaine in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) is an inhibitor of eosinophil-active cytokines.. Clin Exp Immunol. (1996). 104 325–31 [Article] [PubMed]
Hunt, LW, Swedlund, HA, Gleich, GJ Effect of nebulized lidocaine on severe glucocorticoid-dependent asthma.. Mayo Clin Proc. (1996). 71 361–8 [Article] [PubMed]
Abuan, T, Yeager, M, Montgomery, AB Inhaled lidocaine for the treatment of asthma: Lack of efficacy in two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies.. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. (2010). 23 381–8 [Article] [PubMed]
Costa, JC, Neves, JS, de Souza, MV, Siqueira, RA, Romeiro, NC, Boechat, N, e Silva, PM, Martins, MA Synthesis and antispasmodic activity of lidocaine derivatives endowed with reduced local anesthetic action.. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. (2008). 18 1162–6
da Costa, JC, Olsen, PC, de Azeredo Siqueira, R, de Frias Carvalho, V, Serra, MF, Alves, LA, Faria, RX, Xisto, DG, Rocco, PR, Cordeiro, RS, Rodrigues E Silva, PM, Martins, MA JMF2-1, a lidocaine derivative acting on airways spasm and lung allergic inflammation in rats.. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2007). 119 219–25 [Article] [PubMed]
Olsen, PC, Coelho, LP, da Costa, JC, Cordeiro, RS, Silva, PM, Martins, MA Two for one: Cyclic AMP mediates the anti-inflammatory and anti-spasmodic properties of the non-anesthetic lidocaine analog JMF2-1.. Eur J Pharmacol. (2012). 680 102–7 [Article] [PubMed]
Seifert, J, Mostecká, H, Kolar, GF Trifluoromethylanilines—Their effect on DNA synthesis and proliferative activity in parenchymal organs of rats.. Toxicology. (1993). 83 49–59
Parodi, S, Pala, M, Russo, P, Zunino, A, Balbi, C, Albini, A, Valerio, F, Cimberle, MR, Santi, L DNA damage in liver, kidney, bone marrow, and spleen of rats and mice treated with commercial and purified aniline as determined by alkaline elution assay and sister chromatid exchange induction.. Cancer Res. (1982). 42 2277–83 [PubMed]
Neher, E, Sakmann, B The patch clamp technique.. Sci Am. (1992). 266 44–51 [Article] [PubMed]
Coelho, LP, Serra, MF, Pires, AL, Cordeiro, RS, Rodrigues e Silva, PM, dos Santos, MH, Martins, MA 7-Epiclusianone, a tetraprenylated benzophenone, relaxes airway smooth muscle through activation of the nitric oxide-cGMP pathway.. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. (2008). 327 206–14 [Article] [PubMed]
Olsen, PC, Ferreira, TP, Serra, MF, Farias-Filho, FA, Fonseca, BP, Viola, JP, Cordeiro, RS, Silva, PM, Costa, JC, Martins, MA Lidocaine-derivative JMF2-1 prevents ovalbumin-induced airway inflammation by regulating the function and survival of T cells.. Clin Exp Allergy. (2011). 41 250–9 [Article] [PubMed]
Neves, JS, Perez, SA, Spencer, LA, Melo, RC, Weller, PF Subcellular fractionation of human eosinophils: Isolation of functional specific granules on isoosmotic density gradients.. J Immunol Methods. (2009). 344 64–72 [Article] [PubMed]
Fan Chung, K Phosphodiesterase inhibitors in airways disease.. Eur J Pharmacol. (2006). 533 110–7 [Article] [PubMed]
Kai, T, Nishimura, J, Kobayashi, S, Takahashi, S, Yoshitake, J, Kanaide, H Effects of lidocaine on intracellular Ca2+ and tension in airway smooth muscle.. Anesthesiology. (1993). 78 954–65 [Article] [PubMed]
Weiss, EB, Anderson, WH, O’Brien, KP The effect of local anesthetic, lidocaine, on guinea pig trachealis muscle in vitro.. Am Rev Respir Dis. (1975). 112 393–400 [PubMed]
Weiss, EB, Hargraves, WA, Viswanath, SG The inhibitory action of lidocaine in anaphylaxis.. Am Rev Respir Dis. (1978). 117 859–69 [PubMed]
McAlpine, LG, Thomson, NC Lidocaine-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients. Relation to histamine airway responsiveness and effect of preservative.. Chest. (1989). 96 1012–5 [Article] [PubMed]
Downes, H, Loehning, RW Local anesthetic contracture and relaxation of airway smooth muscle.. Anesthesiology. (1977). 47 430–6 [Article] [PubMed]
Yunoki, M, Nakahara, T, Mitani, A, Maruko, T, Kubota, Y, Sakamoto, K, Ishii, K Lidocaine attenuates muscarinic receptor-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase in airway smooth muscle.. Eur J Pharmacol. (2003). 470 65–71 [Article] [PubMed]
Caceres, AI, Brackmann, M, Elia, MD, Bessac, BF, del Camino, D, D’Amours, M, Witek, JS, Fanger, CM, Chong, JA, Hayward, NJ, Homer, RJ, Cohn, L, Huang, X, Moran, MM, Jordt, SE A sensory neuronal ion channel essential for airway inflammation and hyperreactivity in asthma.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2009). 106 9099–104 [Article] [PubMed]
Undem, BJ, Carr, MJ The role of nerves in asthma.. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. (2002). 2 159–65 [Article] [PubMed]
Suzuki, T, Ohishi, K, Kida, J, Uchida, M Influence of pH on the inhibitory effects of local anesthetics on histamine release induced from rat mast cells by concanavalin A and compound 48/80.. Eur J Pharmacol. (1984). 98 347–55 [Article] [PubMed]
Johnson, HG, Miller, MD Inhibition of histamine release and ionophore-induced calcium flux in rat mast cells by lidocaine and chlorpromazine.. Agents Actions. (1979). 9 239–43 [Article] [PubMed]
Yanagi, H, Sankawa, H, Saito, H, Iikura, Y Effect of lidocaine on histamine release and Ca2+ mobilization from mast cells and basophils.. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. (1996). 40 1138–44 [Article] [PubMed]
Zheng, W, Flavell, RA The transcription factor GATA-3 is necessary and sufficient for Th2 cytokine gene expression in CD4 T cells.. Cell. (1997). 89 587–96 [Article] [PubMed]
Neves, JS, Perez, SA, Spencer, LA, Melo, RC, Reynolds, L, Ghiran, I, Mahmudi-Azer, S, Odemuyiwa, SO, Dvorak, AM, Moqbel, R, Weller, PF Eosinophil granules function extracellularly as receptor-mediated secretory organelles.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2008). 105 18478–83 [Article] [PubMed]
Kampen, GT, Stafford, S, Adachi, T, Jinquan, T, Quan, S, Grant, JA, Skov, PS, Poulsen, LK, Alam, R Eotaxin induces degranulation and chemotaxis of eosinophils through the activation of ERK2 and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases.. Blood. (2000). 95 1911–7 [PubMed]
Kodama, T, Matsuyama, T, Miyata, S, Nishimura, H, Nishioka, Y, Kitada, O, Sugita, M Kinetics of apoptosis in the lung of mice with allergic airway inflammation.. Clin Exp Allergy. (1998). 28 1435–43 [Article] [PubMed]
Woolley, KL, Gibson, PG, Carty, K, Wilson, AJ, Twaddell, SH, Woolley, MJ Eosinophil apoptosis and the resolution of airway inflammation in asthma.. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (1996). 154 237–43 [Article] [PubMed]
Okada, S, Hagan, JB, Kato, M, Bankers-Fulbright, JL, Hunt, LW, Gleich, GJ, Kita, H Lidocaine and its analogues inhibit IL-5-mediated survival and activation of human eosinophils.. J Immunol. (1998). 160 4010–7 [PubMed]
Tanaka, A, Minoguchi, K, Oda, N, Yokoe, T, Matsuo, H, Okada, S, Tasaki, T, Adachi, M Inhibitory effect of lidocaine on T cells from patients with allergic asthma.. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2002). 109 485–90 [Article] [PubMed]
Fig. 1.
(A) Chemical structures of lidocaine and JM25-1. (B) Concentration-dependent inhibition of Na+ currents in GH3 cells by lidocaine (circles) and JM25-1 (triangles). Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 8 for JM25-1 and n = 5 for lidocaine); 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were calculated by a fitting concentration–response relation to a sigmoidal model of the form log (inhibitor) versus response–variable slope.
(A) Chemical structures of lidocaine and JM25-1. (B) Concentration-dependent inhibition of Na+ currents in GH3 cells by lidocaine (circles) and JM25-1 (triangles). Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 8 for JM25-1 and n = 5 for lidocaine); 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were calculated by a fitting concentration–response relation to a sigmoidal model of the form log (inhibitor) versus response–variable slope.
Fig. 1.
(A) Chemical structures of lidocaine and JM25-1. (B) Concentration-dependent inhibition of Na+ currents in GH3 cells by lidocaine (circles) and JM25-1 (triangles). Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 8 for JM25-1 and n = 5 for lidocaine); 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were calculated by a fitting concentration–response relation to a sigmoidal model of the form log (inhibitor) versus response–variable slope.
×
Fig. 2.
Effect of lidocaine (squares) and JM25-1 (triangles) on rat tracheal contraction induced by carbachol (10−9 to 10−3 M) (A) or calcium (10−3 to 103 M) (C). Open circles represent control curves. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 9 for all groups), and results were expressed as a percentage of contractile responses induced by 2.5 μM carbachol. Curves were fitted using a sigmoidal model of the form log (agonist) versus response–variable slope. Differences among groups were analyzed as area under the curve (AUC) values by using one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls (B and D). ***P < 0.001 versus tracheal responses from untreated preparations (control); ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 versus lidocaine group.
Effect of lidocaine (squares) and JM25-1 (triangles) on rat tracheal contraction induced by carbachol (10−9 to 10−3 M) (A) or calcium (10−3 to 103 M) (C). Open circles represent control curves. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 9 for all groups), and results were expressed as a percentage of contractile responses induced by 2.5 μM carbachol. Curves were fitted using a sigmoidal model of the form log (agonist) versus response–variable slope. Differences among groups were analyzed as area under the curve (AUC) values by using one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls (B and D). ***P < 0.001 versus tracheal responses from untreated preparations (control); ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 versus lidocaine group.
Fig. 2.
Effect of lidocaine (squares) and JM25-1 (triangles) on rat tracheal contraction induced by carbachol (10−9 to 10−3 M) (A) or calcium (10−3 to 103 M) (C). Open circles represent control curves. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 9 for all groups), and results were expressed as a percentage of contractile responses induced by 2.5 μM carbachol. Curves were fitted using a sigmoidal model of the form log (agonist) versus response–variable slope. Differences among groups were analyzed as area under the curve (AUC) values by using one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls (B and D). ***P < 0.001 versus tracheal responses from untreated preparations (control); ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 versus lidocaine group.
×
Fig. 3.
Effect of SQ22,536 on the tracheal smooth muscle relaxant and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)–increasing properties presented by JM25-1. (A) Effect of 0.1 mM SQ22,536 on carbachol-induced tracheal contraction performed in the absence and presence of 1 mM JM25-1. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). Curves were fitted by using a sigmoidal model of the form log (agonist) versus response–variable slope. Differences among groups were analyzed as area under the curve (AUC) using one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls (B). ***P < 0.001 as compared with tracheal responses from untreated preparations (control), #P < 0.05 when compared with JM25-1 group. (C) Effect of JM25-1 (0.1 to 1 mM) treatment on guinea pig tracheal smooth muscle cell cAMP intracellular levels. Data are expressed as median (n = 3). *P < 0.05 versus untreated cells, #P < 0.05 versus 1 mM JM25-1 group, Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn multiple comparison test.
Effect of SQ22,536 on the tracheal smooth muscle relaxant and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)–increasing properties presented by JM25-1. (A) Effect of 0.1 mM SQ22,536 on carbachol-induced tracheal contraction performed in the absence and presence of 1 mM JM25-1. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). Curves were fitted by using a sigmoidal model of the form log (agonist) versus response–variable slope. Differences among groups were analyzed as area under the curve (AUC) using one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls (B). ***P < 0.001 as compared with tracheal responses from untreated preparations (control), #P < 0.05 when compared with JM25-1 group. (C) Effect of JM25-1 (0.1 to 1 mM) treatment on guinea pig tracheal smooth muscle cell cAMP intracellular levels. Data are expressed as median (n = 3). *P < 0.05 versus untreated cells, #P < 0.05 versus 1 mM JM25-1 group, Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn multiple comparison test.
Fig. 3.
Effect of SQ22,536 on the tracheal smooth muscle relaxant and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)–increasing properties presented by JM25-1. (A) Effect of 0.1 mM SQ22,536 on carbachol-induced tracheal contraction performed in the absence and presence of 1 mM JM25-1. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). Curves were fitted by using a sigmoidal model of the form log (agonist) versus response–variable slope. Differences among groups were analyzed as area under the curve (AUC) using one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls (B). ***P < 0.001 as compared with tracheal responses from untreated preparations (control), #P < 0.05 when compared with JM25-1 group. (C) Effect of JM25-1 (0.1 to 1 mM) treatment on guinea pig tracheal smooth muscle cell cAMP intracellular levels. Data are expressed as median (n = 3). *P < 0.05 versus untreated cells, #P < 0.05 versus 1 mM JM25-1 group, Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn multiple comparison test.
×
Fig. 4.
Effect of nebulized JM25-1 on methacholine-induced changes in transpulmonary resistance (A) and dynamic compliance (B) in A/J mice sensitized and challenged with ovalbumin (OVA). Ovalbumin-challenged mice were treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%) or vehicle. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). §P < 0.05 versus saline group; *P < 0.05 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, two-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Effect of nebulized JM25-1 on methacholine-induced changes in transpulmonary resistance (A) and dynamic compliance (B) in A/J mice sensitized and challenged with ovalbumin (OVA). Ovalbumin-challenged mice were treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%) or vehicle. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). §P < 0.05 versus saline group; *P < 0.05 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, two-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Fig. 4.
Effect of nebulized JM25-1 on methacholine-induced changes in transpulmonary resistance (A) and dynamic compliance (B) in A/J mice sensitized and challenged with ovalbumin (OVA). Ovalbumin-challenged mice were treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%) or vehicle. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). §P < 0.05 versus saline group; *P < 0.05 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, two-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
×
Fig. 5.
Nebulized JM25-1 reduces allergen-induced pulmonary inflammation in A/J mice sensitized and challenged with ovalbumin (OVA). (AC) Photomicrographs of paraffin-embedded Sirius Red–stained lung sections from ovalbumin-sensitized mice challenged with saline, challenged with ovalbumin, and challenged with ovalbumin and treated with 1% JM25-1, respectively. The number of eosinophils (D) and neutrophils (E) in peribronchiolar regions was determined in lung sections by morphometric analyses. Black and white arrows indicate representative eosinophils and neutrophils, respectively. Ovalbumin-challenged mice were treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%), and all samples for histologic examinations were undertaken 24 h after the last ovalbumin challenge. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). §P < 0.001 versus saline group, ***P < 0.001 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test. BR = bronchioles.
Nebulized JM25-1 reduces allergen-induced pulmonary inflammation in A/J mice sensitized and challenged with ovalbumin (OVA). (A–C) Photomicrographs of paraffin-embedded Sirius Red–stained lung sections from ovalbumin-sensitized mice challenged with saline, challenged with ovalbumin, and challenged with ovalbumin and treated with 1% JM25-1, respectively. The number of eosinophils (D) and neutrophils (E) in peribronchiolar regions was determined in lung sections by morphometric analyses. Black and white arrows indicate representative eosinophils and neutrophils, respectively. Ovalbumin-challenged mice were treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%), and all samples for histologic examinations were undertaken 24 h after the last ovalbumin challenge. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). §P < 0.001 versus saline group, ***P < 0.001 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test. BR = bronchioles.
Fig. 5.
Nebulized JM25-1 reduces allergen-induced pulmonary inflammation in A/J mice sensitized and challenged with ovalbumin (OVA). (AC) Photomicrographs of paraffin-embedded Sirius Red–stained lung sections from ovalbumin-sensitized mice challenged with saline, challenged with ovalbumin, and challenged with ovalbumin and treated with 1% JM25-1, respectively. The number of eosinophils (D) and neutrophils (E) in peribronchiolar regions was determined in lung sections by morphometric analyses. Black and white arrows indicate representative eosinophils and neutrophils, respectively. Ovalbumin-challenged mice were treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%), and all samples for histologic examinations were undertaken 24 h after the last ovalbumin challenge. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). §P < 0.001 versus saline group, ***P < 0.001 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test. BR = bronchioles.
×
Fig. 6.
Nebulized JM25-1 reduces airway remodeling caused by allergen-induced lung inflammation in mice. Quantitative assessment of mucus production (A) and fibrotic changes (B) was carried out in lung sections by morphometric analyses. All histologic examinations were undertaken 24 h after the last ovalbumin (OVA) challenge. Ovalbumin-challenged mice were treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%), and all samples for histologic examinations were obtained 24 h after the last ovalbumin challenge. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). §P < 0.001 versus saline group, ***P < 0.001 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test. PAS = periodic acid–Schiff.
Nebulized JM25-1 reduces airway remodeling caused by allergen-induced lung inflammation in mice. Quantitative assessment of mucus production (A) and fibrotic changes (B) was carried out in lung sections by morphometric analyses. All histologic examinations were undertaken 24 h after the last ovalbumin (OVA) challenge. Ovalbumin-challenged mice were treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%), and all samples for histologic examinations were obtained 24 h after the last ovalbumin challenge. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). §P < 0.001 versus saline group, ***P < 0.001 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test. PAS = periodic acid–Schiff.
Fig. 6.
Nebulized JM25-1 reduces airway remodeling caused by allergen-induced lung inflammation in mice. Quantitative assessment of mucus production (A) and fibrotic changes (B) was carried out in lung sections by morphometric analyses. All histologic examinations were undertaken 24 h after the last ovalbumin (OVA) challenge. Ovalbumin-challenged mice were treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%), and all samples for histologic examinations were obtained 24 h after the last ovalbumin challenge. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 7 for all groups). §P < 0.001 versus saline group, ***P < 0.001 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test. PAS = periodic acid–Schiff.
×
Fig. 7.
Nebulized JM25-1 reduces proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine levels and GATA-3 and phosphorylated p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) expression in lung tissue samples. Levels of eotaxin-1 (CCL11) (A), interleukin (IL)-4 (B), IL-5 (C), and IL-13 (D) were measured in lung homogenates by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in ovalbumin (OVA)-challenged mice treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%). n = 6 to 7 in each group. Whole-lung extract was analyzed by Western blotting for GATA-3 (E) and phosphorylated p38 MAPK expression (F). The membranes were reprobed with anti-actin or p38 as the loading controls, respectively (one of the three independent experiments with similar results is shown). Intensity of GATA-3 and phosphorylated p38 MAPK expression was quantified by densitometry and presented as relative intensity of GATA-3 with respect to actin or relative intensity of phosphorylated p38 MAPK (pp38) with respect to total p38 MAPK (p38). Results are represented as whiskers: minimum to maximum (A–D) and mean ± SD (E–F). §§§P < 0.001 versus saline group; **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Nebulized JM25-1 reduces proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine levels and GATA-3 and phosphorylated p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) expression in lung tissue samples. Levels of eotaxin-1 (CCL11) (A), interleukin (IL)-4 (B), IL-5 (C), and IL-13 (D) were measured in lung homogenates by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in ovalbumin (OVA)-challenged mice treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%). n = 6 to 7 in each group. Whole-lung extract was analyzed by Western blotting for GATA-3 (E) and phosphorylated p38 MAPK expression (F). The membranes were reprobed with anti-actin or p38 as the loading controls, respectively (one of the three independent experiments with similar results is shown). Intensity of GATA-3 and phosphorylated p38 MAPK expression was quantified by densitometry and presented as relative intensity of GATA-3 with respect to actin or relative intensity of phosphorylated p38 MAPK (pp38) with respect to total p38 MAPK (p38). Results are represented as whiskers: minimum to maximum (A–D) and mean ± SD (E–F). §§§P < 0.001 versus saline group; **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Fig. 7.
Nebulized JM25-1 reduces proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine levels and GATA-3 and phosphorylated p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) expression in lung tissue samples. Levels of eotaxin-1 (CCL11) (A), interleukin (IL)-4 (B), IL-5 (C), and IL-13 (D) were measured in lung homogenates by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in ovalbumin (OVA)-challenged mice treated by exposure to an aerosol of JM25-1 (0.25 to 1%). n = 6 to 7 in each group. Whole-lung extract was analyzed by Western blotting for GATA-3 (E) and phosphorylated p38 MAPK expression (F). The membranes were reprobed with anti-actin or p38 as the loading controls, respectively (one of the three independent experiments with similar results is shown). Intensity of GATA-3 and phosphorylated p38 MAPK expression was quantified by densitometry and presented as relative intensity of GATA-3 with respect to actin or relative intensity of phosphorylated p38 MAPK (pp38) with respect to total p38 MAPK (p38). Results are represented as whiskers: minimum to maximum (A–D) and mean ± SD (E–F). §§§P < 0.001 versus saline group; **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 versus ovalbumin-challenged group, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
×
Fig. 8.
JM25-1 induced apoptosis of isolated human peripheral eosinophils. Eosinophils were cultured in the presence of interleukin-5 (30 ng/ml) for 72 h in the absence or presence of lidocaine or JM25-1. Column scatter graphs represent the percentage of cells in apoptosis. Eosinophils were treated with JM25-1 at 0.1 to 1 mM (A) or lidocaine (B). Horizontal lines represent the mean value and the open circles represent the median (n = 4, four different eosinophil donors). Results were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Dunn multiple comparison test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 versus untreated group.
JM25-1 induced apoptosis of isolated human peripheral eosinophils. Eosinophils were cultured in the presence of interleukin-5 (30 ng/ml) for 72 h in the absence or presence of lidocaine or JM25-1. Column scatter graphs represent the percentage of cells in apoptosis. Eosinophils were treated with JM25-1 at 0.1 to 1 mM (A) or lidocaine (B). Horizontal lines represent the mean value and the open circles represent the median (n = 4, four different eosinophil donors). Results were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Dunn multiple comparison test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 versus untreated group.
Fig. 8.
JM25-1 induced apoptosis of isolated human peripheral eosinophils. Eosinophils were cultured in the presence of interleukin-5 (30 ng/ml) for 72 h in the absence or presence of lidocaine or JM25-1. Column scatter graphs represent the percentage of cells in apoptosis. Eosinophils were treated with JM25-1 at 0.1 to 1 mM (A) or lidocaine (B). Horizontal lines represent the mean value and the open circles represent the median (n = 4, four different eosinophil donors). Results were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Dunn multiple comparison test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 versus untreated group.
×
Fig. 9.
JM25-1 prevented eotaxin-induced p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphorylation in human eosinophils. Isolated human peripheral eosinophils were pretreated or not with JM25-1 (0.1 to 1 mM) (A) or lidocaine (0.1 to 1 mM) (B) for 15 min and stimulated with eotaxin (100 ng/ml, 1 min). Cell lysates were analyzed by Western blotting for phosphorylated p38 MAPK expression. The membrane was reprobed with anti-p38 as the loading control, respectively (the images represent one of the three independent experiments with similar results). Column scatter graphs represent the densitometry analysis of the bands presented as relative intensity of phosphorylated p38 MAPK (pp38) with respect to total p38 MAPK (p38). Horizontal lines represent the mean values (n = 3, three different eosinophil donors). Results were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Dunn multiple comparison test. §P < 0.05 versus untreated group, *P < 0.05 versus eotaxin-stimulated group not treated with JM25-1 or lidocaine.
JM25-1 prevented eotaxin-induced p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphorylation in human eosinophils. Isolated human peripheral eosinophils were pretreated or not with JM25-1 (0.1 to 1 mM) (A) or lidocaine (0.1 to 1 mM) (B) for 15 min and stimulated with eotaxin (100 ng/ml, 1 min). Cell lysates were analyzed by Western blotting for phosphorylated p38 MAPK expression. The membrane was reprobed with anti-p38 as the loading control, respectively (the images represent one of the three independent experiments with similar results). Column scatter graphs represent the densitometry analysis of the bands presented as relative intensity of phosphorylated p38 MAPK (pp38) with respect to total p38 MAPK (p38). Horizontal lines represent the mean values (n = 3, three different eosinophil donors). Results were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Dunn multiple comparison test. §P < 0.05 versus untreated group, *P < 0.05 versus eotaxin-stimulated group not treated with JM25-1 or lidocaine.
Fig. 9.
JM25-1 prevented eotaxin-induced p38 mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphorylation in human eosinophils. Isolated human peripheral eosinophils were pretreated or not with JM25-1 (0.1 to 1 mM) (A) or lidocaine (0.1 to 1 mM) (B) for 15 min and stimulated with eotaxin (100 ng/ml, 1 min). Cell lysates were analyzed by Western blotting for phosphorylated p38 MAPK expression. The membrane was reprobed with anti-p38 as the loading control, respectively (the images represent one of the three independent experiments with similar results). Column scatter graphs represent the densitometry analysis of the bands presented as relative intensity of phosphorylated p38 MAPK (pp38) with respect to total p38 MAPK (p38). Horizontal lines represent the mean values (n = 3, three different eosinophil donors). Results were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the Dunn multiple comparison test. §P < 0.05 versus untreated group, *P < 0.05 versus eotaxin-stimulated group not treated with JM25-1 or lidocaine.
×
Fig. 10.
Effect of JM25-1 on proliferation (A) and the subdiploid DNA (sub-G0/G1) content (B) of lymph node cells recovered from A/J mice subjected to in vitro stimulation with anti-CD3. The percentage of cells undergoing DNA fragmentation was determined by propidium iodide staining (flow cytometry) performed within 72 h after exposure to anti-CD3. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). §P < 0.05 versus saline-stimulated cells. *P < 0.05 versus anti-CD3-stimulated but untreated cells, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Effect of JM25-1 on proliferation (A) and the subdiploid DNA (sub-G0/G1) content (B) of lymph node cells recovered from A/J mice subjected to in vitro stimulation with anti-CD3. The percentage of cells undergoing DNA fragmentation was determined by propidium iodide staining (flow cytometry) performed within 72 h after exposure to anti-CD3. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). §P < 0.05 versus saline-stimulated cells. *P < 0.05 versus anti-CD3-stimulated but untreated cells, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
Fig. 10.
Effect of JM25-1 on proliferation (A) and the subdiploid DNA (sub-G0/G1) content (B) of lymph node cells recovered from A/J mice subjected to in vitro stimulation with anti-CD3. The percentage of cells undergoing DNA fragmentation was determined by propidium iodide staining (flow cytometry) performed within 72 h after exposure to anti-CD3. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6). §P < 0.05 versus saline-stimulated cells. *P < 0.05 versus anti-CD3-stimulated but untreated cells, one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
×