Free
CLINICAL INVESTIGATION  |   November 1995
Faster Recovery after Anesthesia in Infants after Intravenous Induction with Methohexital Instead of Thiopental
Article Information
Pediatric Anesthesia
CLINICAL INVESTIGATION   |   November 1995
Faster Recovery after Anesthesia in Infants after Intravenous Induction with Methohexital Instead of Thiopental
Anesthesiology 11 1995, Vol.83, 976-979. doi:
Anesthesiology 11 1995, Vol.83, 976-979. doi:
Abstract

Background: To determine possible delays in recovery after intravenous anesthesia induction with thiopental, the drug was compared with methohexital in infants 1–12 months of age who were scheduled for hernia repair or circumcision.

Methods: The infants were given equipotent doses of methohexital (3.0 mg/kg, n = 21) or thiopental (7.3 mg/kg, n = 20), in random and blind fashion. After tracheal intubation, anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in nitrous oxide/oxygen. All children received 0.75 ml/kg caudal bupivacaine (2.5 mg/ml). Isoflurane was discontinued at the beginning of skin closure, and nitrous oxide was terminated immediately after the last suture (end of surgery).
Results: There were no differences between the two groups with respect to age, weight, or duration of surgery, which lasted 19 min (14–23 min) in the methohexital group and 16 min (15–19 min) in the thiopental group (median and inner quartile range). Time from termination of nitrous oxide to extubation did not differ significantly between the groups. Time to spontaneous eye opening after end of surgery was 23 min (5–44 min) after methohexital induction and 55 min (25–74 min) after thiopental induction (P < 0.05). Recovery, assessed as postanesthetic recovery scores by a blinded observer, was significantly more rapid in the methohexital group at arrival in the recovery room and 5, 15, and 45 min after arrival. After 120 min, almost all infants of both groups were awake.
Conclusions: Recovery after short surgical procedures in infants is faster after intravenous induction with methohexital than with thiopental.
THE existence of effective topical anesthesia for venipuncture (e.g., EMLA) makes intravenous anesthesia induction a realistic alternative to mask or rectal induction of anesthesia in children. After intravenous administration of hypnotic agents, the excitatory stage during which the patient is prone to react with laryngospasm in response to stimulation of the upper airway is rapidly passed. This is particularly desirable in small children and infants, whose oxygen reserves are small in relation to their metabolism. 1-2Furthermore, inserting an intravenous catheter before induction increases safety by facilitating the administration of fluids, muscle relaxants, or anticholinergics.
One conceivable drawback with intravenous induction is that the intravenous agent might have residual effects during the postanesthetic recovery phase. We have believed that thiopental, the most frequently used drug, sometimes causes such problems particularly in young infants. Methohexital dissolved in a lipid emulsion is a possible alternative. 3The aim of the current study was to assess recovery after anesthesia induced with intravenous methohexital or thiopental in infants 1–12 months of age.
Materials and Methods
After institutional approval and informed consent from the parents, 41 infants between 1 and 12 months of age, scheduled for hernia repair or circumcision, were randomly assigned to receive intravenous induction of anesthesia with methohexital or thiopental. Randomization was stratified according to postnatal age: 1–3, 4–6, and 6–12 months. All children were ASA physical status 1, born full term (> 37 weeks' gestational age), with a birth weight greater than 2,500 g. Exclusion criteria were signs of infection, allergy to soybean, surgery lasting longer than 40 min, emergency surgery requiring rapid-sequence induction, and failure to establish venous access. Preoperatively, the child fasted for at least 4 h. No preanesthetic medication was given. After treatment with a local anesthetic ointment (EMLA, Astra Pharmaceuticals), a 24-G catheter was placed in a vein in the hand or antecubital fossa.
The anesthetic induction was performed by an independent anesthesiologist to keep the investigator unaware of the drug used. After injection of 0.005 mg/kg intravenous glycopyrrolate, either 3.0 mg/kg methohexital* or 7.3 mg/kg thiopental, i.e., 115% of the respective ED50s in infants aged 1–6 months, 3-4was given as a bolus injection and flushed with saline. After inducing paralysis with 2 mg/kg succinylcholine, the trachea was intubated, and general anesthesia was continued with isoflurane in nitrous oxide/oxygen (65%/35%). Monitoring included electrocardiogram, blood pressure, pulse oximetry (Nellcor N-100), oxygen saturation, esophageal temperature, and end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (Datex Normocap). An end-tidal carbon dioxide tension about 35 mmHg was maintained. About 10 min before surgery, a caudal block with 0.75 ml/kg bupivacaine (2.5 mg/ml) was performed. Isoflurane was supplied via a calibrated vaporizer at the lowest concentration that kept the child immobile and adequately anesthetized as judged from heart rate, blood pressure, and pupil size. Isoflurane was discontinued 5 min before the expected end of surgery, and the end-tidal carbon dioxide tension was allowed to increase to 40–45 mmHg. Nitrous oxide was stopped when the last suture was tied. After 2 min of oxygen ventilation, transition to spontaneous breathing was attempted. When this was well established and there were age adequate movements, i.e., grimacing and movement of all four extremities in the young infant, and more purposeful movements, e.g., attempts to remove the tube in the older infant, the trachea was extubated. Time from end of surgery to tracheal extubation was noted. The child was transported to the recovery room when it maintained patent airways without assistance and an oxygen saturation greater than 95% breathing room air.
In the recovery room, the child was connected to a pulse oximeter and an HP 78833A unit that recorded chest movements by measuring variations in electric impedance between electrocardiograph electrodes. Postanesthetic recovery (PAR) score (1)5was determined at arrival and 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min after arrival by two specially trained nurses unaware of which induction agent was given. Incidence of pain (scored as none, mild, or severe) and central apnea (defined as absence of chest movements for more than 20 s) was noted, as was time to spontaneous eye opening. Postoperative pain was managed with rectal 15 mg/kg paracetamol.
Table 1. Postanesthetic Recovery Score
Image not available
Table 1. Postanesthetic Recovery Score
×
Unless otherwise stated, the results are expressed as median and inner quartile range. Difference in time to full recovery was assessed by survival analysis with the log-rank test. Comparison of durations and of PAR scores was performed with the Mann-Whitney U-test. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.
Results
Twenty-one infants were given methohexital, and 20 received thiopental. The groups were similar with respect to age, weight, length (2), and duration of anesthesia and surgery (3).
Table 2. Patient Characteristics
Image not available
Table 2. Patient Characteristics
×
Table 3. Durations
Image not available
Table 3. Durations
×
In all children, anesthesia was judged to be satisfactorily induced with the doses given. The maintenance isoflurane concentration, i.e., the vaporizer setting about 5 min after skin incision, was 0.75%(0.65–0.75%) in the methohexital group and 0.75%(0.5–1.0%) in the thiopental group. Six patients in the methohexital group and four in the thiopental group needed inspired isoflurane concentrations > 1.0% for a few minutes during hernia dissection.
There was no significant difference in time from end of anesthesia to extubation (P = 0.10). Spontaneous eye opening occurred significantly earlier after methohexital (3). Recovery, assessed with PAR scores, was more rapid after methohexital than after thiopental until the children had been 60 min in the recovery room (1). Time in the recovery room until a full PAR score was reached was 30 (5–60) and 60 (45–120) min, respectively (P < 0.005). At 120 min, one infant in the thiopental group, aged 2.5 months, still had a PAR score of 1.

 Image not available

Pain occurred equally over time in both groups, and there were no differences in pain intensity. The majority of children were scored as having "no pain," but seven in each group were given paracetamol, most of these having "mild pain."
No episode of hypoxemia was noted. One infant given thiopental had repeated apnea episodes during the first 5 min after extubation. No apnea was recorded in the recovery room.
Discussion
The postanesthetic score introduced by Steward was used to assess recovery. 5The score is well established for assessing wakefulness and return of airway patency. In older children, the time elapsed to specific end-points--spontaneous eye opening, giving name, and standing unaided--may be used to assess recovery. 6-7Of these, only spontaneous eye opening was applicable in the current study.
To reduce confounding factors, glycopyrrolate was given as anticholinergic so that central nervous system effects from atropine were avoided. 8-9In contrast, the use of caudal bupivacaine indirectly may have enhanced sedation by eliminating pain. There was no evidence of a converse effect, with remaining sedation masking pain: the timing and dosing of paracetamol postoperatively was similar in the two groups despite the longer-lasting sedation in infants given thiopental.
Barbiturates are rapidly redistributed from the brain, and when a barbiturate is the sole anesthetic agent and is given as a bolus, unconsciousness only lasts a few minutes. The less rapid progress to complete recovery and longer time to spontaneous eye opening in the thiopental group suggest, however, that rather small plasma concentrations are associated with significant sedation in infants. This agrees with findings in children 10and in adults 11in whom central nervous system effects (e.g., drowsiness, respiratory depression) may persist even when the plasma concentration of thiopental is only 1–2% of the initial concentration. In this context, it may be relevant to mention the report by Andropoulos et al. 12of apnea after pyloromyotomy in three full-term infants in whom anesthesia was induced by intravenous thiopental and maintained with halothane/nitrous oxide.
To ensure a satisfactory induction of anesthesia in all children, with equipotent doses of methohexital or thiopental, 115% of previously established ED50doses 3-4were given. No universally accepted endpoint exists for satisfactory intravenous induction, but these doses conform with those we usually employ in infants older than 1 month. The doses usually give a depth of anesthesia that allows a brief period of ventilation by mask. Thereby, the safety of giving relaxants for intubation can be assessed. In the rarer case that inhalation of volatile anesthetic via mask is planned, the dosage ensures smooth transition to inhalational anesthesia in the majority of patients.
In conclusion, recovery after short surgical procedures in infants was more rapid after intravenous induction with methohexital than with thiopental.
The authors thank Vibeke Horstman, Associate Professor in Statistics, for help with statistical analysis.
* Methohexital, 100 mg, was first dissolved in 1 ml NaCl. When the solution was clear, 9.0 ml of 20% lipid emulsion (Intralipid, Kabi Pharmacia Pharmaceuticals, Sweden) was added to give a 10-mg/ml solution. The solution was used within 2 h. 3.
REFERENCES
Thorsteinsson A, Jonmarker C, Larsson A, Vilstrup C, Werner O: Functional residual capacity in anesthetized children: Normal values and values in children with cardiac anomalies. ANESTHESIOLOGY 73:876-881, 1990.
Lindahl SGE: Oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide elimination in infants and children undergoing anaesthesia and surgery. Br J Anaesth 62:70-76, 1989.
Westrin P: Methohexital dissolved in lipid emulsion for intravenous induction of anesthesia in infants and children. ANESTHESIOLOGY 76:917-921, 1992.
Westrin P, Jonmarker C, Werner O: Thiopental requirements for induction of anesthesia in neonates and infants. ANESTHESIOLOGY 71:344-346, 1989.
Steward DJ: A simplified scoring system for the postoperative recovery room. Can Anaesth Soc J 22:111-113, 1975.
Runcie CJ, Mackenzie SJ, Arthur DS, Morton NS: Comparison of recovery from anaesthesia induced in children with either propofol or thiopentone. Br J Anaesth 70:192-195, 1993.
Puttick N, Rosen M: Propofol induction and maintenance with nitrous oxide in paediatric outpatient dental anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 43:646-649, 1988.
Baraka A, Yared J-P, Karam A-M, Winnie A: Glycopyrrolate-neostigmine and atropine—neostigmine mixtures affect post-anesthetic arousal times differently. Anesth Analg 59:431-434, 1980.
Sengupta A, Gupta P, Pandey K: Investigation of glycopyrrolate as a premedicant drug. Br J Anaesth 52:513-516, 1980.
Sorbo S, Hudson R, Loomis J: The pharmacokinetics of thiopental in pediatric surgical patients. ANESTHESIOLOGY 61:666-670, 1984.
Hudson RJ, Stanski DR, Burch PG: Pharmacokinetics of methohexital and thiopental in surgical patients. ANESTHESIOLOGY 59: 215-219, 1983.
Andropoulos DB, Heard MB, Johnson KL, Clarke JT, Rowe RW: Postanesthetic apnea in full-term infants after pyloromyotomy. ANESTHESIOLOGY 80:216-219, 1994.
Table 1. Postanesthetic Recovery Score
Image not available
Table 1. Postanesthetic Recovery Score
×
Table 2. Patient Characteristics
Image not available
Table 2. Patient Characteristics
×
Table 3. Durations
Image not available
Table 3. Durations
×