Free
Correspondence  |   December 2005
Regular Clinical Use Bispectral Index Monitoring May Result in Lighter Depth of Anesthesia as Reflected in Average Higher Bispectral Index Values
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Catarina S. Nunes, Ph.D.
    AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0002A;
  • AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0002A;CECAV-UTAD, Faculdade de CiAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000EA;ncias da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Article Information
Correspondence
Correspondence   |   December 2005
Regular Clinical Use Bispectral Index Monitoring May Result in Lighter Depth of Anesthesia as Reflected in Average Higher Bispectral Index Values
Anesthesiology 12 2005, Vol.103, 1320-1321. doi:0000542-200512000-00042
Anesthesiology 12 2005, Vol.103, 1320-1321. doi:0000542-200512000-00042
To the Editor:AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02014;
A recent study demonstrated that cumulative deep hypnotic time (Bispectral Index of the electroencephalogram AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0005B;BISAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0005D; below 45) is a significant variable in postoperative outcomes. The importance of anesthetic duration and depth is interesting and somewhat surprising, and emphasizes the need to more carefully evaluate the impact of intraoperative management strategies on outcome. Anesthesiologists are now more concerned with assuring adequate depth of anesthesia for both clinical and professional liability reasons. We investigated whether the regular use of BIS monitoring could lead anesthesiologists to work with lighter levels of depth of anesthesia.
Data collected during consecutive neurosurgical interventions (research committee approved and informed consent) with the same anesthesiologist were used in this study. Data were systematically collect on the same weekday in the same operating room during a whole year. Patients were submitted to general anesthesia using propofol (1% Fresenius; Fresenius Kabi Pharma Portugal Lda., Carnaxide, Portugal) and remifentanil (20 AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx03BC;g/ml UltivaAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000AE;; GlaxoSmithKlineAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02013;Produtos FarmacAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000EA;uticos Lda., AlgAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000E9;s, Portugal). Patients with pathologies that could influence the results or showed obvious alteration of mental status were excluded. Patients were monitored with an A-2000XP BISAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000AE; monitor (Aspect Medical Systems, Newton, MA) using a BIS-SensorAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000AE; (Aspect Medical Systems) placed according to the instructions of the manufacturer and an AS3 Datex monitor (DatexAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02013;Engstrom, Helsinki, Finland) connected by an RS-232 interface to a personal computer using Rugloop IIAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000AE; software for data capture every 5 s. Rugloop IIAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000AE; was used to control via  the RS-232 interface the remifentanil infusion pump (Asena Alaris TIVA; Alaris Medical Systems, San Diego, CA) and the propofol infusion pump (Asena Alaris GH, Alaris Medical Systems) using the pharmacokineticAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02013;pharmacodynamic models of Minto et al.  and Schnider et al.  for remifentanil and propofol, respectively. Induction of anesthesia was performed with a propofol infusion (target-controlled infusion) with an initial effect site target of 5 AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx03BC;g/ml and a remifentanil infusion (target-controlled infusion) with an initial plasma target of 2.5 AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx03B7;g/ml. Loss of consciousness was defined as loss of eye opening in response to a tap on the forehead and calling the patient's name. Rocuronium (10 mg/ml EsmeronAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000AE;; Organon Portuguesa Lda., Lisboa, Portugal) was used for muscle relaxation. The drugs' target concentrations were manually controlled by the anesthesiologist during the entire surgery.
Data distribution is expressed as mean AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B1; SD. Statistical correlation analysis, linear regression, and the Student t  test were performed using MATLAB 6.5.1 (The Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA). P  < 0.05 was considered significant. Average BIS and median BIS during the maintenance phase were calculated retrospectively from the anesthetic record and related to the chronological order of the case. The anesthesiologist was blind to the objective of this study.
Forty-five patients met the selection criteria. Patients were aged 49.8 AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B1; 16.5 yr, weighed 67.8 AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B1; 13.4 kg, and were 160.5 AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B1; 8.8 cm tall. Thirty-three were female. The case duration was 287.3 AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B1; 161.6 min.
During surgery, the average BIS value was 39.89 AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B1; 4.04, and the median BIS value was 39.49 AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B1; 4.1. The propofol average effect site and plasma concentrations were 3.01 AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B1; 0.86 and 2.98 AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B1; 0.84 AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx03BC;g/ml, respectively. The average propofol dose was 0.10 AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B1; 0.03 mg AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B7; kgAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02212;1AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B7; minAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02212;1. The total amount of propofol was 1,940 AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B1; 1,289 mg. The remifentanil average effect site and plasma concentrations were 3.13 AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B1; 0.89 and 3.15 AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B1; 0.9 AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx03B7;g/ml, respectively. The average remifentanil dose was 0.11 AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B1; 0.04 AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx03BC;g AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B7; kgAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02212;1AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B7; minAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02212;1. The total amount of remifentanil was 2,093 AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B1; 1,355 AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx03BC;g.
There were significant positive correlations between the chronological order of the case and average BIS (P  AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0003D; 0.0164) and the chronological order of the case and median BIS (P  AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0003D; 0.0148; ). The average effect site propofol concentration decreased significantly over time (P  AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0003D; 0.0094), as did the plasma propofol concentration (P  AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0003D; 0.0112). shows the relation between the average propofol dose during surgery and the chronological order of the case (P  AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0003D; 0.006). There was no significant correlation between the remifentanil dose or concentration and time.
Fig. 1. Linear regression between the median Bispectral Index (BIS) during surgery and the chronological order of the case. Statistical significant correlation (  P  AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0003D; 0.0148) and positive slope (  P  < 0.05). 
Fig. 1. Linear regression between the median Bispectral Index (BIS) during surgery and the chronological order of the case. Statistical significant correlation (  P  AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0003D; 0.0148) and positive slope (  P  < 0.05). 
Fig. 1. Linear regression between the median Bispectral Index (BIS) during surgery and the chronological order of the case. Statistical significant correlation (  P  AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0003D; 0.0148) and positive slope (  P  < 0.05). 
×
Fig. 2. Linear regression between the average propofol dose (mg AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B7; kgAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02212;1AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B7; minAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02212;1) during surgery and the chronological order of the case. Statistical significant correlation (  P  AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0003D; 0.006) and negative slope (  P  < 0.01). 
Fig. 2. Linear regression between the average propofol dose (mg AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B7; kgAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02212;1AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B7; minAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02212;1) during surgery and the chronological order of the case. Statistical significant correlation (  P  AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0003D; 0.006) and negative slope (  P  < 0.01). 
Fig. 2. Linear regression between the average propofol dose (mg AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B7; kgAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02212;1AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B7; minAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02212;1) during surgery and the chronological order of the case. Statistical significant correlation (  P  AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0003D; 0.006) and negative slope (  P  < 0.01). 
×
The possibility of observing the central nervous system response through BIS increased the anesthesiologist's confidence in the level of depth of anesthesia (learning trend) and improved the clinical management. The increasing trend in BIS values with clinical practice was accompanied by a decreasing trend in propofol consumption.
Anesthetic depth is often used as a tool to provide better control of hemodynamic variables. However, hemodynamic depression is one of the major factors associated with perioperative coma and death. A long duration of intraoperative systolic hypotension is also associated with increased risk of postoperative mortality. By controlling depth of anesthesia using BIS, one can more easily control the associated hemodynamic variability (e.g.  , using nonanesthetic drugs).
In our study, we observed that the regular use of BIS monitoring led to higher BIS values and, therefore, lower propofol consumption. This is in accord with the results of Guignard et al.  , who reported a reduced consumption of isoflurane when its titration was guided by BIS monitoring without higher incidence of light anesthesia.
In conclusion, the regular use of BIS monitoring by the anesthesiologist resulted in average higher BIS values. The increasing BIS trend with clinical practice also represented a trend toward safer BIS values (BIS between 45 and 60). This BIS trend was associated with a decrease over time of propofol average concentrations and consumption. Between the first and the last patients, there was an average decrease of 1,077 mg propofol per patient. The decrease in propofol consumption with time was a consequence of the experience with BIS monitoring acquired by the anesthesiologist (i.e.  , trying to avoid excessive anesthesia), with potential benefits to the patients.
AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0002A;CECAV-UTAD, Faculdade de CiAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000EA;ncias da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
References
Monk TG, Saini V, Weldon BC, Sigl JC: Anesthetic management and one-year mortality after noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2005; 100:4AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02013;10Monk, TG Saini, V Weldon, BC Sigl, JC
Cohen NH: Anesthetic depth is not (yet) a predictor of mortalityAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx00021; Anesth Analg 2005; 100:1AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02013;3Cohen, NH
Minto CF, Schnider TW, Shafer SL: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil: II. Model application. Anesthesiology 1997; 86:24AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02013;33Minto, CF Schnider, TW Shafer, SL
Schnider TW, Minto CF, Shafer SL, Gambus PL, Andresen C, Goodale DB, Youngs EJ: The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology 1999; 90:1502AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02013;16Schnider, TW Minto, CF Shafer, SL Gambus, PL Andresen, C Goodale, DB Youngs, EJ
Arbous MS, Grobbee DE, van Kleef JW, de Lange JJ, Spoormans HH, Touw P, Werner FM, Meursing AE: Mortality associated with anaesthesia: A qualitative analysis to identify risk factors. Anaesthesia 2001; 56:1141AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02013;53Arbous, MS Grobbee, DE van Kleef, JW de Lange, JJ Spoormans, HH Touw, P Werner, FM Meursing, AE
Guignard B, Coste C, Menigaux C, Chauvin M: Reduced isoflurane consumption with bispectral index monitor. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45:308AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02013;14Guignard, B Coste, C Menigaux, C Chauvin, M
Fig. 1. Linear regression between the median Bispectral Index (BIS) during surgery and the chronological order of the case. Statistical significant correlation (  P  AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0003D; 0.0148) and positive slope (  P  < 0.05). 
Fig. 1. Linear regression between the median Bispectral Index (BIS) during surgery and the chronological order of the case. Statistical significant correlation (  P  AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0003D; 0.0148) and positive slope (  P  < 0.05). 
Fig. 1. Linear regression between the median Bispectral Index (BIS) during surgery and the chronological order of the case. Statistical significant correlation (  P  AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0003D; 0.0148) and positive slope (  P  < 0.05). 
×
Fig. 2. Linear regression between the average propofol dose (mg AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B7; kgAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02212;1AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B7; minAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02212;1) during surgery and the chronological order of the case. Statistical significant correlation (  P  AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0003D; 0.006) and negative slope (  P  < 0.01). 
Fig. 2. Linear regression between the average propofol dose (mg AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B7; kgAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02212;1AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B7; minAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02212;1) during surgery and the chronological order of the case. Statistical significant correlation (  P  AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0003D; 0.006) and negative slope (  P  < 0.01). 
Fig. 2. Linear regression between the average propofol dose (mg AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B7; kgAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02212;1AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx000B7; minAMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx02212;1) during surgery and the chronological order of the case. Statistical significant correlation (  P  AMPERSANDNUMBERSIGNx0003D; 0.006) and negative slope (  P  < 0.01). 
×