Free
Correspondence  |   July 1996
General Versus Regional Anesthesia for Peripheral Vascular Surgery
Author Notes
  • Department of Anesthesiology; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Elm and Carlton Streets; Buffalo, New York 14263.
Article Information
Correspondence
Correspondence   |   July 1996
General Versus Regional Anesthesia for Peripheral Vascular Surgery
Anesthesiology 7 1996, Vol.85, 224-225. doi:
Anesthesiology 7 1996, Vol.85, 224-225. doi:
To the Editor:--We congratulate Bode and collaborators on completing this important study. [1] However, we have some comments regarding their work [1] and the accompanying editorial. [2] .
We are disappointed that, in the 1990s, anesthesiologists still attempt to improve cardiac outcome by limiting therapeutic protocols to the intraoperative period. Recent work has demonstrated that postoperative myocardial ischemia (POMI) is the single most important predictor of poor cardiac outcome, defined as myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and sudden death. [3] In studies in which researchers evaluate patients for POMI, it was determined that myocardial ischemia occurs most frequently within the first 36-48 h after surgery in 30-60% of the patients. [3-10] Patients who undergo vascular surgery are at risk of experiencing this higher incidence. [5-10] Poor cardiac outcome follows 24-36 h later in 10-50% of the patients. [3-10] Therefore, attempting to determine beneficial effects on cardiac outcome of a technique that is limited to the intraoperative period will not yield clinically useful results.
From the analysis of the natural history of myocardial infractions, it is clear that one has to implement therapeutic techniques both intraoperatively and postoperatively to derive beneficial effects. Our group [11] and others [12] suggested that epidural anesthesia and analgesia is effective in decreasing the incidence of postoperative myocardial ischemia. In addition, the physiologic basis for these results has been established. [11] However, therapy must be provided for at least 72 h. The mechanisms that underly these beneficial effects are described, in part, by Go and Browner in the accompanying editorial to Bode's paper. [2] However, they also fail to recognize the importance of the postoperative period. In the study by Christopherson et al. [13] post-operative epidural therapy was limited to 24 h. Beyond that point, parenteral morphine was used intramuscularly. Likewise, Bode et al. [1] administered parenteral morphine or meperidine intravenously to their patients for 12-24 h. Subcutaneous morphine or oral opioids were used thereafter. They acknowledged that an unspecified number of patients received epidural morphine. However, all epidural catheters were removed after 12-24 h, thereby limiting the most important benefit of this technique.
We suggest that the problem in analyzing perioperative cardiac outcome is not statistical power or analysis, as inferred by Go and Browner--it is protocol design. Therefore, we disagree with their closing statement that "additional randomized controlled trials comparing regional and general anesthesia to determine their effects on perioperative cardiac morbidity and mortality are unlikely to be useful. As of now, further trials are not needed." Conversely, we have an urgent need of randomized controlled trials that compare epidural anesthesia and analgesia with general anesthesia and parenteral analgesia throughout the postoperative period to further clarify this issue. The conclusion that there is no difference in cardiac outcome after general or epidural techniques is, in our view, premature and even incorrect.
A second concern we have with Bode's article [1] is the use of pulmonary artery monitoring in every patient. This is not the standard of care for patients who undergo femoral-to-distal artery bypass surgery. Therefore, their results may not be applicable to routine practices for this procedure throughout the country. Because they neither specified a protocol of treatment for perioperative hemodynamic aberrations detected by pulmonary artery catheter monitoring, nor describe the number of therapeutic interventions per group, they may have introduced a bias in the way patients were treated.
Oscar A. de Leon-Casasola, M.D.; Mark J. Lema, Ph.D., M.D.; Department of Anesthesiology; Roswell Park Cancer Institute; Elm and Carlton Streets; Buffalo, New York 14263
(Accepted for publication April 18, 1996.)
REFERENCES
Bode RH, Lewis KP, Zarich SW, Pierce ET, Roberts M, Kowalchuk GJ, Satwicz PR, Gibbons GW, Hunter JA, Espanola CC, Nesto RW: Cardiac outcomes after peripheral vascular surgery: Comparison of general and regional anesthesia. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1996; 84:3-13.
Go AS, Browner WS: Cardiac outcomes after regional or general anesthesia. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1996; 84:1-2.
Mangano DT, Browner WS, Hollenberg M, London MJ, Tubau JF, Tateo IM: Association of perioperative myocardial ischemia with cardiac morbidity and mortality in men undergoing noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 1990; 323:1781-8.
Managano DT, Silciano D, Hollenberg, Leung JM, Browner WS, Goehner P, Merrick S, Verrier E: Postoperative myocardial ischemia: Therapeutic trials using intensive analgeisa following surgery. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1992; 76:342-53.
McCann RL, Clements FM: Silent myocardial ischemia in patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery: Incidence and association with perioperative cardiac morbidity and mortality. J Vasc Surg 1989; 9:583-7.
Ouyang P, Gerstenblith G, Furman WR: Coronary artery disease: Frequency and significance of early postoperative silent myocardial ischemia in patients having vascular surgery. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64:1113-6.
Pasternack PF, Grossi EA, Baumann FG: The value of silent myocardial ischemia monitoring in the prediction of perioperative myocardial infarction in patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg 1989; 10:617-25.
Raby KE, Barry J, Creager MA, Cook EF, Weisberg MC, Goldman L: Detection and significance of intraoperative and postoperative myocardial ischemia in peripheral vascular surgery. JAMA 1992; 268:222-7.
Becker RC, Underwood DA: Myocardial infarction in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Cleve Clin J Med 1987; 54:25-8.
Landesberg G, Luria MH, Cotev S, Eidelman LA, Anner H, Mosseri M, Schechter D, Assaf J, Erel J, Berlatzky Y: Importance of long-duration postoperative ST-segment depression in cardiac morbidity after vascular surgery. Lancet 1993; 20:715-9.
de Leon-Casasola OA, Lema MJ, Karabella D, Harrison P: Post-operative myocardial ischemia: Epidural versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: A pilot project. Reg Anesth 1995; 20:105-12.
Beattie WS, Buckley DN, Forrest JB: Epidural morphine reduces the risk of postoperative myocardial ischaemia in patients with cardiac risk factors. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40:523-41.
Christopherson R, Beattie C, Frank SM, Morris EJ, Meinert CI, Gottlieb SO, Yates H, Rock P, Parker SD, Perler BA: Perioperative morbidity in patients randomized to epidural or general anesthesia for lower extremity vascular surgery. Perioperative Ischemia Randomized Anesthesia Trial Study Group. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1993; 79:422-34.