Free
Correspondence  |   July 1996
The Shaw Hemostatic Scalpel as an Alternative to Electrocautery in Patients with Pacemakers
Author Notes
  • David Amar, M.D.; David H. Fogel, M.D.; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine.
  • Jatin P. Shah, M.D.; Chief, Head and Neck Service; Department of Surgery; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; 1275 York Avenue; New York, New York 10021.
Article Information
Correspondence
Correspondence   |   July 1996
The Shaw Hemostatic Scalpel as an Alternative to Electrocautery in Patients with Pacemakers
Anesthesiology 7 1996, Vol.85, 223. doi:
Anesthesiology 7 1996, Vol.85, 223. doi:
To the Editor:--It is well known that intraoperative use of electrocautery can potentially affect implanted pulse generators in one of several ways. [1] Inappropriate inhibition or triggering of pacer output during cautery commonly occurs as a result of sensing electromagnetic interference, and is most troublesome in pacemaker-dependent patients. Cautery also may induce transient asynchronous pacing because of reversion to the "noise mode," or reprogramming to the "back-up mode," which necessitates resetting the device. Destruction of pacemaker circuitry with loss of pacemaker function, conduction of electrical impulses with resultant increases in pacing thresholds, myocardial thermal burns or initiation of ventricular fibrillation, [2] and the induction of a "runaway pacemaker" [3] all were reported. We would like to alert anesthesiologists to another available device used to promote surgical hemostasis and to prevent such interference.
A 65-yr-old woman with a right thyroid nodule was scheduled for a right thyroid lobectomy at our institution. The patient had a permanent pacemaker inserted 6 months before this admission for bradydysrhythmia and near syncope. The pacemaker was a dual chamber Pacesetter 2028L generator (Sylmar, CA), with bipolar leads in the right atrium and ventricle. Because of the proximity of the surgical field to the pacemaker (< 6 in), we were concerned about electrocautery interference. The manufacturer was contacted for technical advice on this particular device and advised us not to apply a magnet during electrocautery use.
In addition, the surgeon was ready to use bipolar cautery and suggested that the surgery could be accomplished with the aid of the Shaw Hemostatic Scalpel (Hemostatix Medical Devices, Cherry Hill, New Jersey (Figure 1). At our request, on the morning of surgery, a representative of the Pacesetter company was available, with a device-specific program systems analyzer at our operating room, to help, in case electrocautery was used and the pacemaker required reprogramming. The planned procedure was carried out successfully with the Shaw Scalpel, without difficulty or interference with pacemaker function, and no further follow-up was required.
Figure 1. The Shaw Hemostatic Scalpel and structure.
Figure 1. The Shaw Hemostatic Scalpel and structure.
Figure 1. The Shaw Hemostatic Scalpel and structure.
×
The successful use of the Shaw Scalpel was described in adults and children undergoing a variety of operative procedures. [4-6] The Shaw Scalpel was particularly useful in patients with pacemakers that required replacement of pacemaker batteries. [7] This scalpel works by thermally transferring heat to the tissue, and is electrically insulated from the patient by a Teflon coating (Figure 1). This is an obvious advantage of the Shaw Scalpel over conventional electrocautery in patients with pacemakers. We believe that anesthesiologists aware of this option can prevent serious intraoperative pacemaker malfunction due to electrocautery in select cases where the Shaw Scalpel is available and the surgical site is in close proximity to the pulse generator.
David Amar, M.D.; David H. Fogel, M.D.; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine
Jatin P. Shah, M.D.; Chief, Head and Neck Service; Department of Surgery; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; 1275 York Avenue; New York, New York 10021
(Accepted for publication April 8, 1996.)
REFERENCES
Amar D, Gross JN: Patients with pacemakers. Anesthesia and Co-Existing Heart Disease. Edited by Simpson JI. Boston, Little, Brown and Co., 1993, pp 267-85.
Domino KB, Smith TC: Electrocautery induced reprogramming of a pacemaker using a precordial magnet. Anesth Analg 1983; 62:609-12.
Levine PA, Balady GJ, Lazar HL, Belott PH, Roberts AJ: Electrocautery and pacemakers: Management of the paced patient subject to electrocautery. Ann Thorac Surg 1986; 41:313-7.
Fee WE, Handen C: Parotid gland surgery using the Shaw Hemostatic Scalpel. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1984; 110:739-41.
Salyer KE: Use of a new hemostatic scalpel in plastic surgery. Ann Plast Surg 1984; 13:532-8.
Stauffer UG: The Shaw Haemostatic Scalpel in paediatric surgery: Clinical report on 3,000 operations. Prog Pediatr Surg 1990; 25:39-47.
Erdman S, Levinsky L, Strasberg B, Agmen J, Levy MJ: Use of the Shaw Scalpel in pacemaker operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 89:304-7.
Figure 1. The Shaw Hemostatic Scalpel and structure.
Figure 1. The Shaw Hemostatic Scalpel and structure.
Figure 1. The Shaw Hemostatic Scalpel and structure.
×