Case Reports  |   July 1997
Severe Maternal Hypotension and Fetal Bradycardia after a Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthetic 
Author Notes
  • (D'Angelo) Assistant Professor.
  • (Eisenach) Professor.
  • Received from the Department of Anesthesia, Section of Obstetric Anesthesia, Bowman Gray School of Medicine of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Submitted for publication November 29, 1996. Accepted for publication January 17, 1997.
  • Address reprint requests to Dr. D'Angelo: Department of Anesthesia. Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157–1009. Address electronic mail to:
Article Information
Case Reports
Case Reports   |   July 1997
Severe Maternal Hypotension and Fetal Bradycardia after a Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthetic 
Anesthesiology 7 1997, Vol.87, 166-168. doi:
Anesthesiology 7 1997, Vol.87, 166-168. doi:
Intrathecal sufentanil alone or combined with bupivacaine is commonly administered via a combined spinal epidural (CSE) technique to provide analgesia for patients in labor. Although side effects of these agents have been reported, there is debate about whether spinal sufentanil used alone or with bupivacaine is associated with clinically significant hypotension. [1–6 ] We describe a case of severe maternal hypotension with associated fetal bradycardia after the intrathecal administration of 7.5 micro gram sufentanil and 2.5 mg bupivacaine.
Case Report 
A 32-yr-old, 60-kg, gravida 3, para 2 parturient requested epidural analgesia during active stage 1 labor. Her past medical history was unremarkable, and she had no complications with two epidural anesthetics with previous births. Informed consent was obtained for a CSE anesthetic. Maternal blood pressure was 135/80 mmHg (recorded in the right upper arm with an appropriately sized oscillometric blood pressure cuff), the maternal heart rate was 98 beats/min, and the fetal heart rate was 120–140 beats/min with good variability before intrathecal injection. After a 500-ml bolus dose of intravenous lactated Ringer's solution was given, and with the patient in the sitting position, a CSE technique using a 17-gauge Touhy-Schliff epidural needle (with the loss-of-resistance-to-air technique) and a 4 11/16th-inch 27-gauge Whitacre spinal needle (Becton-Dickinson, Rutherford, NJ) was performed at the L2-L3 interspace without incident. After aspiration of clear spinal fluid, a 1.15-ml solution of 7.5 micro gram sufentanil (Janssen Pharmaceutica, Markham, Ontario) and 2.5 mg bupivacaine (Sensorcaine; Astra Pharmaceutical, Mississauga, Ontario) was administered intrathecally. After the epidural catheter was inserted and secured, the patient was positioned on her side to ensure left uterine displacement. Four minutes after spinal injection, the patient's blood pressure decreased to 74/38 mmHg and was associated with nausea and light headedness. Ephedrine (15 mg) was administered intravenously. Eight minutes after spinal injection, the patient's blood pressure was 69/33 mmHg, and an additional bolus dose of 20 mg ephedrine was administered. Twelve minutes after spinal injection, the patient's blood pressure was 68/33 mmHg, and bradycardia (60–80 beats/min) developed in the fetus. An additional bolus dose of 25 mg ephedrine was administered; at that same time, the patient received supplemental oxygen and an additional 500-ml bolus dose of lactated Ringer's solution, and she was repositioned to the right lateral decubitus position. Phenylephrine was prepared; however, by 16 min after spinal injection, the maternal blood pressure increased to 92/44 mmHg, and the fetal heart rate increased to > 100 beats/min. There was no evidence of uterine hypertonicity during the episode of fetal bradycardia. Immediately after this episode, the patient could perform straight-leg raises, and a bilateral C7 sensory level to pinprick and alcohol was noted. No further episodes of maternal hypotension or fetal bradycardia occurred. The patient requested additional analgesia 170 min after CSE was administered. Local anesthetics were given through the epidural catheter, which provided excellent analgesia throughout the course of labor and delivery. Vaginal delivery occurred 8 h after the CSE was administered. The fetal acid-base status was not assessed at the time of delivery; however, the neonate's APGAR scores were 8 and 9 at 1 and 5 min, respectively.
Individual case reports of significant respiratory depression or arrest in laboring women receiving spinal sufentanil as part of a CSE technique have lead to a consensus that adequacy of respiration must be assessed for 20–30 min after spinal injection. [7,8 ] In contrast, there is controversy over whether this technique decreases blood pressure. [1–6 ] This case suggests that severe hypotension can accompany this technique and underscores the importance of monitoring blood pressure and the adequacy of respiration when CSE analgesia is used.
Spinal injection of sufentanil has been reported to decrease or have no effect on blood pressure in laboring women. [1–6 ] Some researchers have argued that any decrease in blood pressure that may occur is due to pain relief and is without physiologic significance. [1,4–6 ] Others suggest a mild sympatholytic action, perhaps due to a direct inhibitory action of opioids on spinal preganglionic sympathetic neurons. [2,3,9 ] The reported incidence of a decrease in blood pressure > 20% from spinal sufentanil alone ranges from 0–32% and requires ephedrine treatment in 0–12% of patients. [1,2 ] Few details of the effect of this decrease in blood pressure on fetal heart rate have been provided in these series.
The addition of bupivacaine to sufentanil or fentanyl prolongs the duration of analgesia compared with opioid alone with CSE analgesia, [3–6 ] and these combinations are commonly used. The reported incidence of a decrease in blood pressure > 20% from these combinations ranges from 0–13% and requires ephedrine treatment in 0–3.75% of patients. [3–6 ] The density of a motor blockade from 2.5 mg bupivacaine is so minimal that women receiving such combinations are allowed to ambulate in some centers. [6 ] Although a high sensory level was noted at the time of hypotension in the case we describe, this was unlikely to represent extensive spinal anesthesia from bupivacaine because it was not accompanied by motor blockade. Similarly, transient extensive hypalgesia has been noted in 72–100% of women receiving spinal sufentanil alone. [1,2,6 ]
Although many anesthesiologists consider dextrose-free solutions of sufentanil and bupivacaine to be isobaric compared with cerebrospinal fluid, such preparations are actually hypobaric relative to cerebrospinal fluid. [10 ] The CSE anesthetic performed in this case was dextrose-free and administered with the patient in the sitting position, which may have augmented the extent and severity of the hypalgesia and hypotension. Positioning patients in the lateral decubitus position when intrathecal hypobaric solutions are administered could potentially reduce the incidence and severity of side effects.
We report a case of severe maternal hypotension accompanied by fetal bradycardia in a laboring woman receiving sufentanil plus bupivacaine for CSE analgesia. Anesthesiologists using this technique should be aware of the potential for this side effect and should monitor blood pressure and be prepared to treat hypotension should it occur.
Cohen SE, Cherry CM, Holbrook RH, El-Sayed YY, Gibson RN, Jaffe RA: Intrathecal sufentanil for labor analgesia-sensory changes, side effects, and fetal heart rate changes. Anesth Analg 1993; 77:1155-60.
D'Angelo R, Anderson MT, Philip J, Eisenach JC: Intrathecal sufentanil composed to epidural bupivacaine for labor analgesia. Anesthesiology 1994; 80:1209-5.
Campbell DC, Camann WR, Datta S: The addition of bupivacaine to intrathecal sufentanil for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg 1995; 81:305-9.
Kartawiadi SL, Vercauteren MP, VanSteenberge AL, Adriaensen HA: Spinal analgesia during labor with low-dose bupivacaine, sufentanil, and epinephrine. A comparison with epidural analgesia. Reg Anesth 1996; 21:191-6.
Viscomi C, Rathmell J, Mason S, Livermore M, Schapiro H, Kristensen EA: Analgesic efficiency and side effects of intrathecal sufentanil/bupivacaine administered to women in advanced labor (abstract). Anesthesiology 1995; 83:A987.
Shennan A, Cooke V, Lloyd-Jones F, Morgan B, DeSwiet M: Blood pressure changes during labour and whilst ambulatory with combined spinal epidural analgesia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102:192-7.
Baker MN, Sarna MC: Respiratory arrest after a second dose of intrathecal sufentanil. Anesthesiology 1995; 83:231-2.
Greenhalgh CA: Respiratory arrest in a parturient following intrathecal injection of sufentanil and bupivacaine. Anaesthesia 1996; 51:173-5.
Romagnano MA, Hamill RW: Spinal sympathetic pathway: An enkephalin ladder. Science 1984; 225:737-9.
Richardson MG, Wissler RN: Densities of dextrose-free intrathecal local anesthetics, opioids, and combinations measured at 37 [degree sign] Celsius. Anesth Analg 1997; 84:95-9.