Free
Meeting Abstracts  |   February 2001
Electrophysiologic Evidence for Increased Endogenous GABAergic but Not Glycinergic Inhibitory Tone in the Rat Spinal Nerve Ligation Model of Neuropathy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Vesa K. Kontinen, M.D., Ph.D.
    *
  • Louise C. Stanfa, Ph.D.
  • Amlan Basu
  • Anthony H. Dickenson, Ph.D.
    §
  • *Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Department of Pharmacology, University College London, and Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Helsinki. †Postdoctoral Research Fellow, ‡Medical Student, §Professor, Department of Pharmacology, University College London.
  • Received from the Department of Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom, and the Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Article Information
Meeting Abstracts   |   February 2001
Electrophysiologic Evidence for Increased Endogenous GABAergic but Not Glycinergic Inhibitory Tone in the Rat Spinal Nerve Ligation Model of Neuropathy
Anesthesiology 2 2001, Vol.94, 333-339. doi:
Anesthesiology 2 2001, Vol.94, 333-339. doi:
γ-AMINOBUTYRIC acid (GABA) is the most abundant inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system and plays roles in the control of the pathways that transmit sensory events, including nociception. 1 GABA acts as a transmitter in spinal interneurons 2 and in descending inhibitory tracts terminating in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. 3 Glycine acts as an inhibitory transmitter at the strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors, which are often colocalized with GABAAreceptors. 4–6 There is evidence that both GABA and glycinergic interneurons are preferentially associated with the control of low-threshold afferent input to the spinal cord. 6–9 Consistent with this, intrathecal administration of the GABAA-receptor antagonist bicuculline 10 or the glycine-receptor antagonist strychnine 10,11 produces segmentally localized tactile allodynia-like behavior in conscious rats and increased responses to mechanical stimulation in anesthetized cats. 12 Intrathecal strychnine has also been shown to produce in anesthetized rats reflex responses similar to those produced by nociceptive stimuli 13,14 and enhanced neuronal responses to low-threshold mechanical stimulation. 15 These studies indicate a tonic GABAergic and glycinergic inhibition of low-threshold afferents innervating mechanoceptors in normal rats. Thus, reduced activity in these spinal inhibitory systems could result in mechanical allodynia.
Changes in the inhibitory activity mediated by these two transmitters are therefore of interest in the development of neuropathic pain. GABA immunoreactivity in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord has been reported to decrease after partial injury of a sciatic nerve 16,17 and transection of the sciatic nerve. 18 Similar changes occur in a model of spinal injury–induced pain, 19 suggesting that a decrease in GABAergic tone in the spinal cord may underlie the allodynia observed in these models. However, these decreases in content could be interpreted as resulting from increased release of the amino acid; indeed, increased concentrations of GABA have been measured in the dorsal quadrant of the spinal cord ipsilateral to the nerve injury. 20 Both GABAA- and GABAB-receptor binding in the spinal cord have been shown to change in a complicated manner after neurectomy. 21 After tight ligation of the L5 spinal nerve, the mRNA for the γ2 subunit of the GABAAreceptor has been shown to be significantly downregulated in the medium- to large-sized L5 dorsal root ganglion neurons ipsilateral to the ligation as compared with the contralateral side, suggesting loss of presynaptic inhibition of the ipsilateral L5 primary afferent terminals. 22 However, the GABAAreceptor expression in the noninjured L4 dorsal root ganglions was unchanged. 22 Thus, it is presently unclear how these complex anatomic changes relate to the functional role of GABA in the spinal cord after nerve injury.
Much less is known about changes in the glycinergic system after nerve injuries. Glycine receptor density in the grey matter of the spinal cord dorsal horn has been reported to decrease bilaterally after a unilateral sciatic nerve constriction injury. 23 In addition, the uptake of glycine in the spinal cord is enhanced after peripheral crush injury of sciatic nerve but returns to control levels 9–12 days after the injury. 24 These results suggest that nerve injury can induce changes in the spinal glycinergic system, but the time course and bilateral nature of some changes do not appear to correlate well with the development of symptoms of allodynia.
The aim of the present study was to assess whether the role of the spinal GABAergic and glycinergic systems in spinal sensory processing is altered in a model of neuropathic pain compared with that in normal animals.
Methods
Model of Neuropathic Pain
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (Central Biological Services, University College London) weighing 120–160 g at the time of the surgery were used. Rats were housed in groups of five in plastic cages in artificial lighting with a fixed 12-h light–dark cycle. Laboratory chow and water were available ad libitum  . Guidelines for animal research by the United Kingdom Home Office and the Council of the American Physiologic Society were followed. The spinal nerve ligation (SNL) model of neuropathic pain was used. 25 In brief, the animals were anesthetized with halothane (Fluothane; Zeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom) in nitrous oxide and oxygen (50:50). The left L5 and L6 spinal nerves were exposed by removing a small piece of the paravertebral muscle and a part of the left transverse process of the L5 lumbar vertebra. The L5 and L6 spinal nerves were then carefully isolated and tightly ligated with 6-0 silk. A sham operation was performed by exposing but not ligating the spinal nerves. After checking for hemostasis, the muscle, the adjacent fascia, and the skin were closed with sutures.
Mechanical and Cold Sensitivity
The behavioral signs of mechanical and cold allodynia were measured with a series of von Frey filaments and by application of a drop of acetone as previously described. 26 In brief, the rats stood on a metal mesh platform, and the plantar surface of the paw was touched with different von Frey filaments (Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments; Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL) with a bending force of 0.2–15 g. Each filament was applied five times at 5-s intervals until the weakest filament that induced paw withdrawal on more than half the occasions it was presented was found. Cold allodynia was measured as the number of brisk foot withdrawal responses after five consecutive applications of a drop of acetone to the plantar surface of the paw. The assessment of mechanical and cold sensitivity was performed in the SNL and sham-operated rats 7 and 14 days after the operation to verify that the animals entered to the electrophysiologic study exhibited mechanical and cold allodynia.
Electrophysiology
The electrophysiology was performed 15–18 days after the surgery and on nonoperated control animals of similar size, as described previously. 27,28 The rat was anesthetized with halothane (3% during induction, 1.5% during the recordings) in nitrous oxide and oxygen (66%:33%), and the trachea was cannulated. No neuromuscular blockers were used. The rat was secured in a stereotaxic frame, and a laminectomy was performed over lumbar segments L1–L3. The spine was clamped rostral and caudal to the laminectomy, and the dura covering the exposed part of the spinal cord was removed. Parylene-coated tungsten electrodes were used to make single-unit extracellular recordings of dorsal horn neurons receiving afferent input from the hind paw. The electrode was lowered into the spinal cord using a SCAT microdrive (Digitlmer, Welwyn, UK), which allowed measurement of the depth of the neuron relative to the surface of the dorsal horn. Gentle tapping of the plantar surface of the hind paw with the fingers was used as the search stimulus for finding wide-dynamic-range neurons.
Transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the receptive field was applied at three times the C-fiber threshold, and poststimulus histograms to a train of 16 stimuli at 0.5 Hz with a 2-ms pulse width were constructed (Spike 2 software, C.E.D. 1401 interface; Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, UK). The resulting Aβ-, Aδ-, and C-fiber–evoked responses were separated by latency (0–20, 20–90, and 90–300 ms, respectively) and quantified. In addition, after discharge, the activity after the main C-fiber–evoked band between 300 and 800 ms was recorded and quantified. Poststimulus histograms were constructed at 10-min intervals before administration of the drug until a stable (< 10% change between tests) response was obtained, and thereafter for 40 min after each drug dose. For analyzing wind-up, the initial response of the neuron to the first stimulus in the train and the final response of the neuron after the repeated 16 stimuli in the train were measured over the C-fiber and postdischarge latencies (90–800 ms).
Drugs
Bicuculline methobromide was obtained from Tocris Cookson Ltd. (Bristol, United Kingdom), and strychnine-HCl was obtained from RBI (Poole, United Kingdom). Both drugs were dissolved in 0.9% NaCl. The vials containing strychnine solutions were kept wrapped in aluminium foil to prevent exposure to light. All drugs were stored at 4°C. The doses of bicuculline and strychnine were administered on the spinal cord in volume of 50 μl using a glass Hamilton microsyringe in a cumulative manner, with a 1-h interval between each dose. The number of neurons recorded was 5–12 for each drug dose in each study group. The exact numbers are given in the figure legends.
Statistical Analysis
Normally distributed continuous variables, such as the properties of the recorded neurons, were analyzed using analysis of variance followed by the Dunn post hoc  test when appropriate. Discrete variables, such as the measures of mechanical and cold sensitivity, were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test for paired comparisons, and the Wilcoxon signed rank and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for comparisons between the groups, as appropriate. Significance was set at P  less than 0.05.
Results
Mechanical and Cold Sensitivity
The SNL group rats developed mechanical and cold allodynia in the operated paw. The von Frey filament force that induced paw withdrawal in SNL rats 7 days after the operation was 7.0 ± 1.5 g (median and median absolute deviation) and 8.5 ± 3.2 g 14 days after the operation, whereas applying the strongest filament used (15 g) did not cause paw withdrawal in any of the rats in the sham-operated group at either 7 (P  < 0.001) or 14 days after the operation (P  < 0.001). No paw withdrawal responses to mechanical stimulation occurred in the paw contralateral to the operation in either the SNL or the sham-operated rats. In the acetone drop test 7 days after the operation, the median number of responses was 1.5 in the operated paw (range, 0–4) and 0 in the sham-operated group (P  < 0.001), and 14 days after the operation was 1.0 (range, 0–4) in the operated paw and 0 in the sham-operated group (P  < 0.001). No paw withdrawal responses to the acetone stimulation occurred in the paw contralateral to the operation in either the SNL or the sham-operated rats. These behavioral manifestations of nerve injury did not differ between the rats used in the bicuculline and strychnine studies (data not shown).
Neurons Recorded
All neurons recorded were wide-dynamic-range type and had receptive fields located on the plantar surface of the hind paw. The baseline characteristics of the neurons recorded are described in tables 1 and 2. Neurons that showed constant spontaneous activity during the baseline recordings were not used in this experiment.
Table 1. Characteristics of the Neurons used in the Bicuculline Experiment
Image not available
Table 1. Characteristics of the Neurons used in the Bicuculline Experiment
×
Table 2. Characteristics of the Neurons Used in the Strychnine Experiment
Image not available
Table 2. Characteristics of the Neurons Used in the Strychnine Experiment
×
Effects of Intrathecal Bicuculline
Bicuculline significantly increased the Aδ-fiber–evoked activity in a dose-related manner in all three experimental groups (fig. 1). The peak of this effect was observed 20 min after each dose. There were no significant differences between the SNL rats and either of the control groups with respect to the effect of bicuculline. The C-fiber–evoked activity was significantly increased with bicuculline in the SNL animals but not in the control groups (P  = 0.008 for SNL vs.  nonoperated, and P  = 0.004 for SNL vs.  sham with 50 μg bicuculline;fig. 1). Bicuculline did not significantly alter the Aβ-fiber–mediated activity or the postdischarge in any of the experimental groups (fig. 1).
Fig. 1. The effect of bicuculline on Aβ-, Aδ-, and C-fiber–evoked activity (16 stimuli of 3 × C-fiber threshold, 0.5 Hz, 2-ms-wide pulse) and postdischarge (PD) of a population of dorsal horn neurons in rats with spinal nerve ligation–induced neuropathy (circles) and sham-operated (triangles) and nonoperated control animals (squares). Mean of the effect achieved 20 min after intrathecal administration of bicuculline (± SEM) is plotted against the respective dose. In the spinal nerve ligation group, 7 cells were recorded after 0.5 μg bicuculline, 10 after 5 μg bicuculline, and 10 after 50 μg bicuculline. In the sham-operated control group, n = 9, 12, and 10, respectively, and in the nonoperated control group, n = 7, 9, and 8, respectively. Asterisk indicates statistically significant difference between the study groups.
Fig. 1. The effect of bicuculline on Aβ-, Aδ-, and C-fiber–evoked activity (16 stimuli of 3 × C-fiber threshold, 0.5 Hz, 2-ms-wide pulse) and postdischarge (PD) of a population of dorsal horn neurons in rats with spinal nerve ligation–induced neuropathy (circles) and sham-operated (triangles) and nonoperated control animals (squares). Mean of the effect achieved 20 min after intrathecal administration of bicuculline (± SEM) is plotted against the respective dose. In the spinal nerve ligation group, 7 cells were recorded after 0.5 μg bicuculline, 10 after 5 μg bicuculline, and 10 after 50 μg bicuculline. In the sham-operated control group, n = 9, 12, and 10, respectively, and in the nonoperated control group, n = 7, 9, and 8, respectively. Asterisk indicates statistically significant difference between the study groups.
Fig. 1. The effect of bicuculline on Aβ-, Aδ-, and C-fiber–evoked activity (16 stimuli of 3 × C-fiber threshold, 0.5 Hz, 2-ms-wide pulse) and postdischarge (PD) of a population of dorsal horn neurons in rats with spinal nerve ligation–induced neuropathy (circles) and sham-operated (triangles) and nonoperated control animals (squares). Mean of the effect achieved 20 min after intrathecal administration of bicuculline (± SEM) is plotted against the respective dose. In the spinal nerve ligation group, 7 cells were recorded after 0.5 μg bicuculline, 10 after 5 μg bicuculline, and 10 after 50 μg bicuculline. In the sham-operated control group, n = 9, 12, and 10, respectively, and in the nonoperated control group, n = 7, 9, and 8, respectively. Asterisk indicates statistically significant difference between the study groups.
×
The initial neuronal response was increased by bicuculline in a dose-related manner in all three study groups (fig. 2). There were no statistically significant differences among the study groups (fig. 2). The final response after 16 consecutive electrical stimuli (0.5 Hz) was significantly increased after bicuculline in the group with SNL-induced neuropathy but not in the sham-operated or nonoperated control animals (fig. 2;P  = 0.05 for SNL vs.  sham and 0.05 for SNL vs.  normal). In the SNL group, 4 of the 15 neurons started to fire spontaneously after bicuculline administration, with a mean peak firing rate of 12 ± 4.7 Hz with 0.5 μg bicuculline (n = 3), 14 ± 7.0 Hz with 5 μg bicuculline (n = 3), and 17 ± 10 Hz with 50 μg bicuculline (n = 4). In the sham-operated control group, bicuculline administration caused 2 of 16 neurons to fire spontaneously, with a mean peak firing rate of 1.2 Hz with 0.5 μg bicuculline (n = 1), 14 Hz with 5 μg bicuculline (n = 2), and 18 Hz with 50 μg bicuculline (n = 2).
Fig. 2. The effect of bicuculline on the initial response after the first electrical stimulus of the train and the final response after 16 consecutive electrical stimuli (0.5 Hz) measured in the C-fiber and postdischarge latencies (90–800 ms) in rats with spinal nerve ligation–induced neuropathy (circles) and sham-operated (triangles) and nonoperated control animals (squares). Mean of the effect achieved 20 min after intrathecal (i.t.) administration of bicuculline (± SEM) is plotted against the respective dose. Numbers of cells recorded after each bicuculline dose are the same as in figure 1. Asterisk indicates statistically significant difference between the study groups.
Fig. 2. The effect of bicuculline on the initial response after the first electrical stimulus of the train and the final response after 16 consecutive electrical stimuli (0.5 Hz) measured in the C-fiber and postdischarge latencies (90–800 ms) in rats with spinal nerve ligation–induced neuropathy (circles) and sham-operated (triangles) and nonoperated control animals (squares). Mean of the effect achieved 20 min after intrathecal (i.t.) administration of bicuculline (± SEM) is plotted against the respective dose. Numbers of cells recorded after each bicuculline dose are the same as in figure 1. Asterisk indicates statistically significant difference between the study groups.
Fig. 2. The effect of bicuculline on the initial response after the first electrical stimulus of the train and the final response after 16 consecutive electrical stimuli (0.5 Hz) measured in the C-fiber and postdischarge latencies (90–800 ms) in rats with spinal nerve ligation–induced neuropathy (circles) and sham-operated (triangles) and nonoperated control animals (squares). Mean of the effect achieved 20 min after intrathecal (i.t.) administration of bicuculline (± SEM) is plotted against the respective dose. Numbers of cells recorded after each bicuculline dose are the same as in figure 1. Asterisk indicates statistically significant difference between the study groups.
×
Effects of Intrathecal Strychnine
Because intrathecal strychnine did not produce any effect in the pilot experiments in normal animals, only SNL rats and nonoperated control animals were studied. Strychnine did not significantly alter the activity mediated by any of the fiber types (fig. 3). The initial response to the first electrical stimulus of the train and the final response after all 16 stimuli (see above) were not changed by strychnine in either group of animals. However, in a number of animals, segmental motor responses, such as spontaneous tail flicks or muscle twitches in the body occurred, although there were no changes in the activity of the dorsal horn neurons.
Fig. 3. The effect of strychnine on Aβ-, Aδ-, and C-fiber–evoked activity (16 stimuli of 3 × C-fiber threshold, 0.5 Hz, 2-ms-wide pulse) and postdischarge (PD) of a population of dorsal horn neurons in rats with spinal nerve ligation–induced neuropathy (circles) and nonoperated control animals (squares). Mean of the effect (± SEM) achieved 20 min after intrathecal administration of strychnine is plotted against the respective dose. In the spinal nerve ligation group, 7 cells were recorded after 1 μg strychnine, 6 after 10 μg strychnine, and 6 after 100 μg strychnine. In the nonoperated control group, n = 9, 9, and 8, respectively.
Fig. 3. The effect of strychnine on Aβ-, Aδ-, and C-fiber–evoked activity (16 stimuli of 3 × C-fiber threshold, 0.5 Hz, 2-ms-wide pulse) and postdischarge (PD) of a population of dorsal horn neurons in rats with spinal nerve ligation–induced neuropathy (circles) and nonoperated control animals (squares). Mean of the effect (± SEM) achieved 20 min after intrathecal administration of strychnine is plotted against the respective dose. In the spinal nerve ligation group, 7 cells were recorded after 1 μg strychnine, 6 after 10 μg strychnine, and 6 after 100 μg strychnine. In the nonoperated control group, n = 9, 9, and 8, respectively.
Fig. 3. The effect of strychnine on Aβ-, Aδ-, and C-fiber–evoked activity (16 stimuli of 3 × C-fiber threshold, 0.5 Hz, 2-ms-wide pulse) and postdischarge (PD) of a population of dorsal horn neurons in rats with spinal nerve ligation–induced neuropathy (circles) and nonoperated control animals (squares). Mean of the effect (± SEM) achieved 20 min after intrathecal administration of strychnine is plotted against the respective dose. In the spinal nerve ligation group, 7 cells were recorded after 1 μg strychnine, 6 after 10 μg strychnine, and 6 after 100 μg strychnine. In the nonoperated control group, n = 9, 9, and 8, respectively.
×
Discussion
The mechanical allodynia that occurred in the SNL group after the nerve injury was comparable to the results reported previously. 25,26,28,29 In the electrophysiologic recordings, the GABAAantagonist bicuculline produced statistically significant increases in the Aδ-fiber–evoked activity in SNL and sham-operated and nonoperated control rats, and increased C-fiber–mediated activity in the SNL group but not in either of the control groups. The glycine-receptor antagonist strychnine did not have any statistically significant effect on any of the parameters studied in either SNL rats or nonoperated control animals.
In an earlier electrophysiologic study in normal rats, bicuculline facilitated significantly Aδ- and C-fiber–evoked responses in a dose-dependent manner. The facilitation of the C-fiber–evoked response was statistically significant but small compared with the profound potentiation observed on the Aδ-fiber–evoked response. 30 This would agree with findings reported in normal rats with spinal transection, where the benzodiazepine midazolam, which potentiates GABAAreceptor function, caused only a weak depression of C-fiber–evoked responses but had a marked dose-dependent depressive effect on the Aδ-fiber–evoked response of the spinal cord wide-dynamic-range neurons. 31 This GABAAeffect on Aδ-fiber–evoked responses may have a morphologic basis: GABAergic terminals contact many more Aδ-fiber terminals than nonglomerular C-fiber terminals and form no contacts at all with glomerular C-fiber terminals. 32 In a recent study, the benzodiazepine agonist midazolam, acting spinally, reduced Aδ-evoked responses in a dose-dependent manner in both SNL and control animals but inhibited C-fiber–mediated activity significantly only in the SNL-injured animals. 33 Overall, these results perfectly mirror the present findings in that the profile of midazolam, which enhances GABA transmission, was the exact opposite of the effects of bicuculline, which blocks the actions of GABA at the GABAAreceptor. Thus, it can be surmised that GABAergic neurons are subject to plasticity after nerve injury. In the present study, the profound facilitation of the Aδ-fiber–evoked responses by bicuculline was unchanged in all study groups. In contrast, an enhancement of the C-fiber responses and the final response, a measure of the enhanced activity in a neuron produced by wind-up, was observed only after nerve injury. The overall evoked response after C-fiber stimulation was increased in these animals, although the initial response, a measure of the ability of the first C-fiber volley to evoke a response, was unaltered (fig. 2). Thus, it appears likely that the enhanced C-fiber responses and final responses produced by the drug after nerve injury result from postsynaptic mechanisms, possibly increased GABAA-mediated controls acting on interneurons in polysynaptic nociceptive C-fiber pathways. Figure 4is a schematic diagram illustrating the proposed changes in the spinal GABAergic systems in neuropathy. The marked GABAergic inhibitory tone on the Aδ-fiber–evoked responses is not altered in neuropathy, whereas the less pronounced GABA control of C-fiber responses is enhanced, which may reflect changes in the polysynaptic C-fiber pathways after nerve injury.
Fig. 4. Possible mechanisms by which spinal nerve ligation alters GABAergic modulations of Aδ- and C-fiber–mediated nociceptive input. (A  ) In normal unijured state, there is a profound, most likely presynaptic GABAergic inhibitory tone on the Aδ-fiber–evoked responses and a less pronounced presynaptic inhibition also on the C-fiber–mediated responses. These are not altered in neuropathy. (B  ) On the basis of the present findings, we propose enhanced GABAergic control of the polysynaptic C-fiber pathway after nerve injury. (C  ) There are also likely to be GABAergic inhibitory interneurons synapsing with the projection neuron. The possible afferent drive on to the GABA neurons is omitted for clarity.
Fig. 4. Possible mechanisms by which spinal nerve ligation alters GABAergic modulations of Aδ- and C-fiber–mediated nociceptive input. (A 
	) In normal unijured state, there is a profound, most likely presynaptic GABAergic inhibitory tone on the Aδ-fiber–evoked responses and a less pronounced presynaptic inhibition also on the C-fiber–mediated responses. These are not altered in neuropathy. (B 
	) On the basis of the present findings, we propose enhanced GABAergic control of the polysynaptic C-fiber pathway after nerve injury. (C 
	) There are also likely to be GABAergic inhibitory interneurons synapsing with the projection neuron. The possible afferent drive on to the GABA neurons is omitted for clarity.
Fig. 4. Possible mechanisms by which spinal nerve ligation alters GABAergic modulations of Aδ- and C-fiber–mediated nociceptive input. (A  ) In normal unijured state, there is a profound, most likely presynaptic GABAergic inhibitory tone on the Aδ-fiber–evoked responses and a less pronounced presynaptic inhibition also on the C-fiber–mediated responses. These are not altered in neuropathy. (B  ) On the basis of the present findings, we propose enhanced GABAergic control of the polysynaptic C-fiber pathway after nerve injury. (C  ) There are also likely to be GABAergic inhibitory interneurons synapsing with the projection neuron. The possible afferent drive on to the GABA neurons is omitted for clarity.
×
In behavioral experiments, intrathecal administration of both bicuculline and strychnine produce allodynia-like behavior, facilitation of nocifensive flexor reflexes, and cardiovascular responses similar to those produced by nociceptive stimuli.10–14In the present study, administration of strychnine (1.0–100 μg intrathecally) did not significantly change the responses of the wide-dynamic-range neurons in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord in the electrophysiologic recordings. This discrepancy between the previous behavioral studies and the electrophysiologic findings in the present study could be a result of several factors, including the type of stimulation used, the species, the population of cells studied, and the depth of anesthesia. However, bicuculline was effective under the same conditions.
Strychnine-induced allodynia has been shown to be selective for nonnoxious light tactile stimulation 34,35 and initiated by primary afferents not normally involved in nociception, possibly Aββfibers 13,34 . The fact that intrathecal strychnine does not produce hyperalgesia to mechanical, thermal, or chemical noxious stimuli further indicates the independence of nociceptive pathways and strychnine-sensitive afferent inputs to the spinal cord. 13,34 In the present study, suprathreshold electrical stimulation at three times the C-fiber threshold was used to study changes in both the C- and the Aδ-fiber–mediated effects. Strychnine applied near the dorsal horn neurons in α-chloralose–anesthetized cats through a dialysis fiber causes a significantly enhanced response to hair follicle activation only. 15 Similar treatment with bicuculline results in increased responses to hair deflection, low- and high-threshold tonic mechanical stimulation of the receptive field, and increased background discharge in nociceptive dorsal horn neurons. 12 
The behavioral allodynia produced by spinal strychnine is segmentally localized and can be prevented with intrathecally administered glycine, 13 which would indicate a spinal effect. However, the cardiovascular responses produced by intrathecal administration of strychnine can be observed only in lightly anesthetized animals, but not in animals during surgical anesthesia. 13 We required anesthesia depth at surgical levels for electrophysiologic recordings. Despite this, some animals showed segmental spontaneous and, above all, evoked motor responses to low-threshold stimuli, such as touching the animal’s tail. It is conceivable that a large part of the agitation in the behaving animals could result from blockade of the recurrent inhibitory glycinergic interneurons in the motor response arc, the Renshaw neuron rather than a selective effect on sensory neurons.
In conclusion, bicuculline produced dose-related facilitations of the Aδ-fiber–evoked activity in all study groups and significantly increased C-fiber–mediated activity in the SNL group. This suggests a modality-dependent shift in the inhibitory controls exerted by GABA after nerve injury, possibly as compensation for increased C-fiber–evoked excitability. This would indicate that the extent of hyperalgesia in neuropathy is modulated by endogenous spinal GABA neurons. There were no differences in the effect of bicuculline on low-threshold responses among the study groups, indicating that GABAA-mediated control of low-threshold inputs is not altered by nerve injury, at least under these conditions. These findings would suggest that the purported loss of GABA controls on low threshold inputs in neuropathy, proposed to be a basis for allodynia, is unlikely. The morphologic evidence for reduced level of GABA in neuropathy may, in fact, result from increased release of the transmitter rather than a downregulation of these inhibitory controls. This, in turn, may partly be responsible for the reduced baseline responses of the spinal neurons in the SNL model of neuropathic pain. These results and our previous findings with midazolam would suggest that a reassessment of GABAergic mechanisms in neuropathic pain is needed.
References
Hammond DL: Inhibitory neurotransmitters and nociception: Role of GABA and glycine, The Pharmacology of Pain. Edited by Dickenson AH, Besson J-M. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1997, pp 361–83
Carlton SM, Hayes ES: Light microscopic and ultrastructural analysis of GABA-immunoreactive profiles in the monkey spinal cord. J Comp Neurol 1990; 300: 162–82Carlton, SM Hayes, ES
Antal M, Petko M, Polgar E, Heizmann CW, Storm-Mathisen J: Direct evidence of an extensive GABAergic innervation of the spinal dorsal horn by fibres descending from the rostral ventromedial medulla. Neuroscience 1996; 73: 509–18Antal, M Petko, M Polgar, E Heizmann, CW Storm-Mathisen, J
Todd AJ, Sullivan AC: Light microscope study of the coexistence of GABA-like and glycine-like immunoreactivities in the spinal cord of the rat. J Comp Neurol 1990; 296: 496–505Todd, AJ Sullivan, AC
Bohlhalter S, Mohler H, Fritschy JM: Inhibitory neurotransmission in rat spinal cord: Co-localization of glycine- and GABAA-receptors at GABAergic synaptic contacts demonstrated by triple immunofluorescence staining. Brain Res 1994; 642: 59–69Bohlhalter, S Mohler, H Fritschy, JM
Todd AJ, Watt C, Spike RC, Sieghart W: Colocalization of GABA, glycine, and their receptors at synapses in the rat spinal cord. J Neurosci 1996; 16: 974–82Todd, AJ Watt, C Spike, RC Sieghart, W
Alvarez FJ, Kavookjian AM, Light AR: Synaptic interactions between GABA-immunoreactive profiles and the terminals of functionally defined myelinated nociceptors in the monkey and cat spinal cord. J Neurosci 1992; 12: 2901–17Alvarez, FJ Kavookjian, AM Light, AR
Todd AJ: GABA and glycine in synaptic glomeruli of the rat spinal dorsal horn. Eur J Neurosci 1996; 8: 2492–8Todd, AJ
Todd AJ, Spike RC, Brodbelt AR, Price RF, Shehab SA: Some inhibitory neurons in the spinal cord develop c-fos-immunoreactivity after noxious stimulation. Neuroscience 1994; 63: 805–16Todd, AJ Spike, RC Brodbelt, AR Price, RF Shehab, SA
Yaksh TL: Behavioral and autonomic correlates of the tactile evoked allodynia produced by spinal glycine inhibition: Effects of modutatory receptor systems and excitatory amino acid antagonists. Pain 1989; 37: 111–23Yaksh, TL
Beyer C, Roberts LA, Komisaruk BR: Hyperalgesia induced by altered glycinergic activity at the spinal cord. Life Sci 1985; 37: 875–82Beyer, C Roberts, LA Komisaruk, BR
Sorkin LS, Puig S, Jones DL: Spinal bicuculline produces hypersensitivity of dorsal horn neurons: Effects of excitatory amino acid antagonists. Pain 1998; 77: 181–90Sorkin, LS Puig, S Jones, DL
Sherman SE, Loomis CW: Morphine insensitive allodynia is produced by intrathecal strychnine in the lightly anesthetized rat. Pain 1994; 56: 17–29Sherman, SE Loomis, CW
Sivilotti L, Woolf CJ: The contribution of GABAA and glycine receptors to central sensitization: Disinhibition and touch-evoked allodynia in the spinal cord. J Neurophysiol 1994; 72: 169–79Sivilotti, L Woolf, CJ
Sorkin LS, Puig S: Neuronal model of tactile allodynia produced by spinal strychnine: Effects of excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists and a mu-opiate receptor agonist. Pain 1996; 68: 283–92Sorkin, LS Puig, S
Ibuki T, Hama AT, Wang XT, Pappas GD, Sagen J: Loss of GABA-immunoreactivity in the spinal dorsal horn of rats with peripheral nerve injury and promotion of recovery by adrenal medullary grafts. Neuroscience 1997; 76: 845–58Ibuki, T Hama, AT Wang, XT Pappas, GD Sagen, J
Ralston DD, Behbehani M, Sehlhorst SC, Meng X-W, Ralston HJ: Decreased GABA immunoreactivity in rat dorsal horn is correlated with pain behaviour: A light and electron microcopic study, Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Pain. Edited by Jensen TS, Turner JA, Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z. Seattle, IASP Press, 1997, pp 547–60
Castro-Lopes JM, Tavares I, Coimbra A: GABA decreases in the spinal cord dorsal horn after peripheral neurectomy. Brain Res 1993; 620: 287–91Castro-Lopes, JM Tavares, I Coimbra, A
Zhang AL, Hao JX, Seiger A, Xu XJ, Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z, Grant G, Aldskogius H: Decreased GABA immunoreactivity in spinal cord dorsal horn neurons after transient spinal cord ischemia in the rat. Brain Res 1994; 656: 187–90Zhang, AL Hao, JX Seiger, A Xu, XJ Wiesenfeld-Hallin, Z Grant, G Aldskogius, H
Satoh O, Omote K: Roles of monoaminergic, glycinergic and GABAergic inhibitory systems in the spinal cord in rats with peripheral mononeuropathy. Brain Res 1996; 728: 27–36Satoh, O Omote, K
Castro-Lopes JM, Malcangio M, Pan BH, Bowery NG: Complex changes of GABAA and GABAB receptor binding in the spinal cord dorsal horn following peripheral inflammation or neurectomy. Brain Res 1995; 679: 289–97Castro-Lopes, JM Malcangio, M Pan, BH Bowery, NG
Fukuoka T, Tokunaga A, Kondo E, Miki K, Tachibana T, Noguchi K: Change in mRNAs for neuropeptides and the GABA(A) receptor in dorsal root ganglion neurons in a rat experimental neuropathic pain model. Pain 1998; 78: 13–26Fukuoka, T Tokunaga, A Kondo, E Miki, K Tachibana, T Noguchi, K
Simpson RK Jr, Huang W: Glycine receptor reduction within segmental gray matter in a rat model in neuropathic pain. Neurol Res 1998; 20: 161–8Simpson, RK Huang, W
Somps CJ, Boyajian CL, Luttges MW: Changes in neurotransmitter uptake in the spinal cord following peripheral nerve injury. Synapse 1988; 2: 109–16Somps, CJ Boyajian, CL Luttges, MW
Kim SH, Chung JM: An experimental model for peripheral neuropathy produced by segmental spinal nerve ligation in the rat. Pain 1992; 50: 355–63Kim, SH Chung, JM
Kontinen VK, Paananen S, Kalso E: The effects of the alpha2-adrenergic agonist, dexmedetomidine, in the spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain in rats. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 355–60Kontinen, VK Paananen, S Kalso, E
Dickenson AH, Sullivan AF: Electrophysiological studies on the effects of intrathecal morphine on nociceptive neurones in the rat dorsal horn. Pain 1986; 24: 211–22Dickenson, AH Sullivan, AF
Chapman V, Suzuki R, Dickenson AH: Electrophysiological characterization of spinal neuronal response properties in anaesthetized rats after ligation of spinal nerves L5-L6. J Physiol 1998; 507: 881–94Chapman, V Suzuki, R Dickenson, AH
Kontinen VK, Paananen S, Kalso E: Systemic morphine in the prevention of allodynia in the rat spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain. Eur J Pain 1998; 2: 35–42Kontinen, VK Paananen, S Kalso, E
Reeve AJ, Dickenson AH, Kerr NC: Spinal effects of bicuculline: Modulation of an allodynia-like state by an A1-receptor agonist, morphine, and an NMDA-receptor antagonist. J Neurophysiol 1998; 79: 1494–507Reeve, AJ Dickenson, AH Kerr, NC
Clavier N, Lombard MC, Besson JM: Benzodiazepines and pain: Effects of midazolam on the activities of nociceptive non-specific dorsal horn neurons in the rat spinal cord. Pain 1992; 48: 61–71Clavier, N Lombard, MC Besson, JM
Bernardi PS, Valtschanoff JG, Weinberg RJ, Schmidt HH, Rustioni A: Synaptic interactions between primary afferent terminals and GABA and nitric oxide-synthesizing neurons in superficial laminae of the rat spinal cord. J Neurosci 1995; 15: 1363–71Bernardi, PS Valtschanoff, JG Weinberg, RJ Schmidt, HH Rustioni, A
Kontinen VK, Dickenson AH: Effects of midazolam in the spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain in rats. Pain 2000; 85: 425–31Kontinen, VK Dickenson, AH
Sherman SE, Loomis CW: Strychnine-sensitive modulation is selective for non-noxious somatosensory input in the spinal cord of the rat. Pain 1996; 66: 321–30Sherman, SE Loomis, CW
Milne B, Duggan S, Jhamandas K, Loomis C: Innocuous hair deflection evokes a nociceptive-like activation of catechol oxidation in the rat locus coeruleus following intrathecal strychnine: A biochemical index of allodynia using in vivo voltammetry. Brain Res 1996; 718: 198–202Milne, B Duggan, S Jhamandas, K Loomis, C
Fig. 1. The effect of bicuculline on Aβ-, Aδ-, and C-fiber–evoked activity (16 stimuli of 3 × C-fiber threshold, 0.5 Hz, 2-ms-wide pulse) and postdischarge (PD) of a population of dorsal horn neurons in rats with spinal nerve ligation–induced neuropathy (circles) and sham-operated (triangles) and nonoperated control animals (squares). Mean of the effect achieved 20 min after intrathecal administration of bicuculline (± SEM) is plotted against the respective dose. In the spinal nerve ligation group, 7 cells were recorded after 0.5 μg bicuculline, 10 after 5 μg bicuculline, and 10 after 50 μg bicuculline. In the sham-operated control group, n = 9, 12, and 10, respectively, and in the nonoperated control group, n = 7, 9, and 8, respectively. Asterisk indicates statistically significant difference between the study groups.
Fig. 1. The effect of bicuculline on Aβ-, Aδ-, and C-fiber–evoked activity (16 stimuli of 3 × C-fiber threshold, 0.5 Hz, 2-ms-wide pulse) and postdischarge (PD) of a population of dorsal horn neurons in rats with spinal nerve ligation–induced neuropathy (circles) and sham-operated (triangles) and nonoperated control animals (squares). Mean of the effect achieved 20 min after intrathecal administration of bicuculline (± SEM) is plotted against the respective dose. In the spinal nerve ligation group, 7 cells were recorded after 0.5 μg bicuculline, 10 after 5 μg bicuculline, and 10 after 50 μg bicuculline. In the sham-operated control group, n = 9, 12, and 10, respectively, and in the nonoperated control group, n = 7, 9, and 8, respectively. Asterisk indicates statistically significant difference between the study groups.
Fig. 1. The effect of bicuculline on Aβ-, Aδ-, and C-fiber–evoked activity (16 stimuli of 3 × C-fiber threshold, 0.5 Hz, 2-ms-wide pulse) and postdischarge (PD) of a population of dorsal horn neurons in rats with spinal nerve ligation–induced neuropathy (circles) and sham-operated (triangles) and nonoperated control animals (squares). Mean of the effect achieved 20 min after intrathecal administration of bicuculline (± SEM) is plotted against the respective dose. In the spinal nerve ligation group, 7 cells were recorded after 0.5 μg bicuculline, 10 after 5 μg bicuculline, and 10 after 50 μg bicuculline. In the sham-operated control group, n = 9, 12, and 10, respectively, and in the nonoperated control group, n = 7, 9, and 8, respectively. Asterisk indicates statistically significant difference between the study groups.
×
Fig. 2. The effect of bicuculline on the initial response after the first electrical stimulus of the train and the final response after 16 consecutive electrical stimuli (0.5 Hz) measured in the C-fiber and postdischarge latencies (90–800 ms) in rats with spinal nerve ligation–induced neuropathy (circles) and sham-operated (triangles) and nonoperated control animals (squares). Mean of the effect achieved 20 min after intrathecal (i.t.) administration of bicuculline (± SEM) is plotted against the respective dose. Numbers of cells recorded after each bicuculline dose are the same as in figure 1. Asterisk indicates statistically significant difference between the study groups.
Fig. 2. The effect of bicuculline on the initial response after the first electrical stimulus of the train and the final response after 16 consecutive electrical stimuli (0.5 Hz) measured in the C-fiber and postdischarge latencies (90–800 ms) in rats with spinal nerve ligation–induced neuropathy (circles) and sham-operated (triangles) and nonoperated control animals (squares). Mean of the effect achieved 20 min after intrathecal (i.t.) administration of bicuculline (± SEM) is plotted against the respective dose. Numbers of cells recorded after each bicuculline dose are the same as in figure 1. Asterisk indicates statistically significant difference between the study groups.
Fig. 2. The effect of bicuculline on the initial response after the first electrical stimulus of the train and the final response after 16 consecutive electrical stimuli (0.5 Hz) measured in the C-fiber and postdischarge latencies (90–800 ms) in rats with spinal nerve ligation–induced neuropathy (circles) and sham-operated (triangles) and nonoperated control animals (squares). Mean of the effect achieved 20 min after intrathecal (i.t.) administration of bicuculline (± SEM) is plotted against the respective dose. Numbers of cells recorded after each bicuculline dose are the same as in figure 1. Asterisk indicates statistically significant difference between the study groups.
×
Fig. 3. The effect of strychnine on Aβ-, Aδ-, and C-fiber–evoked activity (16 stimuli of 3 × C-fiber threshold, 0.5 Hz, 2-ms-wide pulse) and postdischarge (PD) of a population of dorsal horn neurons in rats with spinal nerve ligation–induced neuropathy (circles) and nonoperated control animals (squares). Mean of the effect (± SEM) achieved 20 min after intrathecal administration of strychnine is plotted against the respective dose. In the spinal nerve ligation group, 7 cells were recorded after 1 μg strychnine, 6 after 10 μg strychnine, and 6 after 100 μg strychnine. In the nonoperated control group, n = 9, 9, and 8, respectively.
Fig. 3. The effect of strychnine on Aβ-, Aδ-, and C-fiber–evoked activity (16 stimuli of 3 × C-fiber threshold, 0.5 Hz, 2-ms-wide pulse) and postdischarge (PD) of a population of dorsal horn neurons in rats with spinal nerve ligation–induced neuropathy (circles) and nonoperated control animals (squares). Mean of the effect (± SEM) achieved 20 min after intrathecal administration of strychnine is plotted against the respective dose. In the spinal nerve ligation group, 7 cells were recorded after 1 μg strychnine, 6 after 10 μg strychnine, and 6 after 100 μg strychnine. In the nonoperated control group, n = 9, 9, and 8, respectively.
Fig. 3. The effect of strychnine on Aβ-, Aδ-, and C-fiber–evoked activity (16 stimuli of 3 × C-fiber threshold, 0.5 Hz, 2-ms-wide pulse) and postdischarge (PD) of a population of dorsal horn neurons in rats with spinal nerve ligation–induced neuropathy (circles) and nonoperated control animals (squares). Mean of the effect (± SEM) achieved 20 min after intrathecal administration of strychnine is plotted against the respective dose. In the spinal nerve ligation group, 7 cells were recorded after 1 μg strychnine, 6 after 10 μg strychnine, and 6 after 100 μg strychnine. In the nonoperated control group, n = 9, 9, and 8, respectively.
×
Fig. 4. Possible mechanisms by which spinal nerve ligation alters GABAergic modulations of Aδ- and C-fiber–mediated nociceptive input. (A  ) In normal unijured state, there is a profound, most likely presynaptic GABAergic inhibitory tone on the Aδ-fiber–evoked responses and a less pronounced presynaptic inhibition also on the C-fiber–mediated responses. These are not altered in neuropathy. (B  ) On the basis of the present findings, we propose enhanced GABAergic control of the polysynaptic C-fiber pathway after nerve injury. (C  ) There are also likely to be GABAergic inhibitory interneurons synapsing with the projection neuron. The possible afferent drive on to the GABA neurons is omitted for clarity.
Fig. 4. Possible mechanisms by which spinal nerve ligation alters GABAergic modulations of Aδ- and C-fiber–mediated nociceptive input. (A 
	) In normal unijured state, there is a profound, most likely presynaptic GABAergic inhibitory tone on the Aδ-fiber–evoked responses and a less pronounced presynaptic inhibition also on the C-fiber–mediated responses. These are not altered in neuropathy. (B 
	) On the basis of the present findings, we propose enhanced GABAergic control of the polysynaptic C-fiber pathway after nerve injury. (C 
	) There are also likely to be GABAergic inhibitory interneurons synapsing with the projection neuron. The possible afferent drive on to the GABA neurons is omitted for clarity.
Fig. 4. Possible mechanisms by which spinal nerve ligation alters GABAergic modulations of Aδ- and C-fiber–mediated nociceptive input. (A  ) In normal unijured state, there is a profound, most likely presynaptic GABAergic inhibitory tone on the Aδ-fiber–evoked responses and a less pronounced presynaptic inhibition also on the C-fiber–mediated responses. These are not altered in neuropathy. (B  ) On the basis of the present findings, we propose enhanced GABAergic control of the polysynaptic C-fiber pathway after nerve injury. (C  ) There are also likely to be GABAergic inhibitory interneurons synapsing with the projection neuron. The possible afferent drive on to the GABA neurons is omitted for clarity.
×
Table 1. Characteristics of the Neurons used in the Bicuculline Experiment
Image not available
Table 1. Characteristics of the Neurons used in the Bicuculline Experiment
×
Table 2. Characteristics of the Neurons Used in the Strychnine Experiment
Image not available
Table 2. Characteristics of the Neurons Used in the Strychnine Experiment
×