Free
Case Reports  |   January 2005
Tramadol and Vocal Cord Closure
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Vincenzo Fodale, M.D.
    *
  • Baldassare Mondello, M.D.
  • Francesco Mirenda, M.D.
  • Francesco Spinelli, M.D.
    §
  • Letterio B. Santamaria, M.D.
  • * Research Professor of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, ∥ Full Professor of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Neuroscience, Psychiatric and Anesthesiological Sciences, † Thoracic Surgery Staff, ‡ Vascular Surgery Staff, § Full Professor of Vascular Surgery, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.
Article Information
Case Reports / Pain Medicine / Respiratory System
Case Reports   |   January 2005
Tramadol and Vocal Cord Closure
Anesthesiology 1 2005, Vol.102, 227-229. doi:
Anesthesiology 1 2005, Vol.102, 227-229. doi:
TRAMADOL is an analgesic acting as both a weak opioid agonist and an inhibitor of monoamine neurotransmitter reuptake. It also provides effective postoperative analgesia.1 Unlike other opioids, it is well tolerated and has no clinically relevant effects on cardiovascular parameters; therefore, it is widely administered and may prove particularly useful in patients with poor cardiopulmonary function, including the elderly, and in patients with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug contraindications.2 The most common side-effects of tramadol (incidence 1.6% to 6.1%) are nausea, dizziness, drowsiness, sweating, vomiting, and dry mouth.2 
Effects of tramadol on control of breathing have been reported but with divergent points of view. Several clinical studies have reported the absence of a significant respiratory depression by an analgesic dose of tramadol.3–7 The reputation of tramadol as an analgesic lacking respiratory depression has contributed to its increased clinical use in intraoperative and postoperative periods.8 Other studies, however, indicate that under some circumstances, tramadol may cause respiratory depression.9–12 Nieuwenhuijs et al.  10 reported that in healthy volunteers tramadol depresses respiration, probably mediated by an effect on μ-opioid receptors. However, the affinity of tramadol at μ-opioid receptors is much lower (>6,000 times) than that of morphine, and this makes it a potentially interesting analgesic with minimal respiratory depression.9 
There are no reports of tramadol effects on vocal cords, such as closure or adduction. This is a report of a hitherto unknown and potential life-threatening adverse event.
Case Report
In January 2004, a 76-yr-old, 65 kg, male nonsmoker with a history of diabetes and ischemic heart disease, taking glibenclamide (an oral hypoglycemic medicine) and acenocoumarol (an oral anticoagulant), underwent open vascular surgery for open abdominal aneurysm with insertion of a Dacron prosthesis. After general anesthesia, postoperative pain control was managed administrating an induction dose of tramadol 2 mg/kg followed by a suggested continuous infusion of 0.20 mg ·kg−1·h−1(plus supplementary bolus if required). The aim was to obtain a pain level of 3 or less as measured with the Verbal Pain Scale (ranging from 0 to 10). To obtain this goal, the infusion rate of tramadol was adjusted to 0.4 mg ·kg−1·h−1. Other drugs administered were heparin for prophylaxis of thromboembolism, ondansetron to prevent nausea and vomiting, and antibiotics.
Twenty-eight hours after surgery the patient was calm, pain free (Verbal Pain Scale was 0), and responsive to verbal commands. Respiratory rate was 11 breaths/min, and peripheral oxygen saturation 98%. Approximately 720 mg of tramadol were administered via  continuous infusion throughout the postoperative period. No other drugs had recently been given with the exception of the continuous heparin infusion. Hemodynamic parameters were well maintained, but the patient exhibited nausea, sweating, weariness, and chest wall rigidity. Mild dyspnea in association with stridor also occurred. Tramadol infusion was stopped, and corticosteroids and oxygen administration were ineffective. Nevertheless, dyspnea with stridor persisted, breathing effort increased, and peripheral oxygen saturation decreased from 98% to 73%. Clinically, the patient was awake with peripheral and mucosal cyanosis, and systolic blood pressure increased to 160 mmHg. A fiberoptic bronchoscope, positioned in the airway, photographed the glottis and documented vocal cord closure without signs of edema (fig. 1a). The ear, nose, and throat specialist diagnosed vocal cord closure and suggested an emergency tracheotomy. Nevertheless, before performing any invasive procedure in a patient with therapeutic reduction of coagulative parameters, the possibility that vocal cord closure could be iatrogenic as a result of opioid assumption was considered. Therefore, under fiberoptic bronchoscope vision, naloxone 1 mg was given intravenously to reverse opioid effects of tramadol. After giving naloxone, a progressive opening of the vocal cords was documented (fig. 1b). Clinically, dyspnea and stridor cessation was observed, with a dramatic improvement of peripheral oxygen saturation up to 95%. As is normally expected in such cases, the patient complained of severe pain in the surgical wound. A third photograph was taken minutes later, showing further improvement in the vocal cord opening (fig. 1c). All these data suggested an involvement of the opioid effect of tramadol in the genesis of vocal cord closure. Therefore, neither tracheotomy nor endotracheal tube insertion were performed. Thereafter, the patient had an uncomplicated postoperative clinical course and was safely discharged after 7 days.
Fig. 1. Fiberoptic bronchoscope vision. Vocal cord closure during inspiratory phase after administration of high doses of tramadol for postoperative pain control (  a  ), progressive opening 4 min after giving naloxone (  b  ), and ulterior improvement in opening 20 min later (  c  ). 
Fig. 1. Fiberoptic bronchoscope vision. Vocal cord closure during inspiratory phase after administration of high doses of tramadol for postoperative pain control (  a  ), progressive opening 4 min after giving naloxone (  b  ), and ulterior improvement in opening 20 min later (  c  ). 
Fig. 1. Fiberoptic bronchoscope vision. Vocal cord closure during inspiratory phase after administration of high doses of tramadol for postoperative pain control (  a  ), progressive opening 4 min after giving naloxone (  b  ), and ulterior improvement in opening 20 min later (  c  ). 
×
Discussion
Vocal cord closure is a life-threatening adverse event causing difficulty in ventilation and hypoxemia.13 Frequently, emergency intubation or tracheotomy is required.14 
Opioid administration is related to vocal cord closure. Bennet et al.  15 documented progressing cord closure in 28 of 30 patients after administration of morphine, given intramuscularly to provide sedation, and induction with sufentanil, concluding that closure of vocal cords is the major cause of difficult ventilation after opioid-induced anesthesia. Vocal cord closure was also reported in patients receiving fentanyl.16,17 Lalley et al.  18 suggested that low doses of fentanyl act on vagal postinspiratory (laryngeal adductor) motoneurons, whereas in vagal laryngeal adductor and pharyngeal constrictor motoneurons, depression of depolarizing synaptic drive potentials led to sparse, very low frequency discharges. Such effects on three types of vagal motoneurons might explain tonic vocal fold closure and pharyngeal obstruction of airflow.18 
High-dose opiate administration may be accompanied by intense and generalized muscle rigidity. Studies in animal models suggested that opiate-induced muscle rigidity is primarily the result of activation of central μ-opioid receptors.19 A negative modulatory role of central Δ1-opioid and κ1-opioid receptors on systemic microagonist mediated muscle rigidity has also been demonstrated.19 Muscle rigidity induced by tramadol administration has also been reported.20 
It may be surprising that tramadol, a relatively weak μ-agonist, produced fentanyl-like effects, as tramadol analgesia is thought to be mediated both through an action on μ-opioid receptors and through the inhibition of the reuptake of monoamines or stimulation of their release.9,21,22 Nevertheless, the opioid effect of tramadol is mediated via  μ-receptors because its affinity at Δ-receptors and κ- receptors is even lower than at the μ-receptor.9,22,23 Tramadol is a racemic mixture of two enantiomers, and the opioid action is exerted by the (+)-enantiomer and its metabolite O-desmethyltramadol, which has a greater affinity at the μ-receptor than its parent compound.9,22 Moreover, in elderly subjects older than 75 yr, tramadol serum concentrations are slightly increased and the elimination half-life is slightly prolonged. The aged can also be expected to vary more widely in their ability to tolerate adverse drug effects.
In our patient, treatment with the opioid antagonist naloxone led to complete recovery without consequences, confirming that this complication was related to opioid action of tramadol. It was of primary importance to correlate the symptoms experienced by the patient with the opioid drug given, and the consequent and prompt administration of the antagonist avoided emergency invasive treatments, such as endotracheal tube positioning or tracheotomy, high risk solutions in a patient with alterations in coagulation parameters and not free of potential complications per se  . It is also of interest because the use of tramadol has recently expanded, and an increasing number of elderly patients are medicated with this drug for pain control, often outside the hospital or in the home. Approximately one quarter of the population older than 75 yr use analgesics regularly, and tramadol is one of the most frequently prescribed analgesics.24 
The primary goal of this case report was to describe the occurrence of vocal cord closure in an aged patient as a result of a high dose administration of tramadol. But the more interesting aspect is that therapy with naloxone led to prompt and complete resolution of this adverse effect. However, the dose of naloxone required to reverse the μ-receptor-mediated action of tramadol could be much higher than that usually needed for morphine.9 
Therefore, this potential life-threatening adverse event, if recognized and related to administration of a high dose of tramadol, may also be promptly and easily managed outside the hospital or in the home by administrating the antagonist naloxone, similarly to other symptoms of opioid overdose.
References
Lehmann KA: Tramadol in acute pain. Drugs 1997; 53(Suppl 2):25–33Lehmann, KA
Scott LJ, Perry CM: Tramadol: A review of its use in perioperative pain. Drugs 2000; 60:139–76Scott, LJ Perry, CM
Mildh LH, Leino KH, Kirvela OA: Effects of tramadol and meperidine on respiration, plasma catecholamine concentrations, and hemodynamics. J Clin Anaesth 1999; 11:310–6Mildh, LH Leino, KH Kirvela, OA
Tarkkila P, Tuominen M, Lingren L: Comparison of respiratory effects of tramadol and pethidine. Eur J Anaesth 1998; 15:64–8Tarkkila, P Tuominen, M Lingren, L
Tarkkila P, Tuominen M, Lingren L: Comparison of respiratory effects of tramadol and oxycodone. J Clin Anesth 1997; 9:582–5Tarkkila, P Tuominen, M Lingren, L
Vickers MD, O'Flaherty D, Szekely SM, Read M, Yoshizumi J: Tramadol: Pain relief by an opioid without depression of respiration. Anaesthesia 1992; 47:291–6Vickers, MD O'Flaherty, D Szekely, SM Read, M Yoshizumi, J
Houmes RJ, Voets MA, Verkaaik A, Erdmann W, Lachmann B: Efficacy and safety of tramadol versus morphine for moderate and severe postoperative pain with special regard to respiratory depression. Anesth Analg 1992; 74:510–4Houmes, RJ Voets, MA Verkaaik, A Erdmann, W Lachmann, B
Bamigbade TA, Lanford RM: The clinical use of tramadol hydrochloride. Pain Rev 1998; 5:155–82Bamigbade, TA Lanford, RM
Teppema LJ, Nieuwenhuijs D, Olievier CN, Dahan A: Respiratory depression by tramadol in the cat: Involvement of opioid receptors. Anesthesiology 2003; 98:420–7Teppema, LJ Nieuwenhuijs, D Olievier, CN Dahan, A
Nieuwenhuijs D, Bruce J, Drummond GB, Warren PM, Dahan A: Influence of oral tramadol on the dynamic ventilatory response to carbon dioxide in healthy volunteers. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87:860–5Nieuwenhuijs, D Bruce, J Drummond, GB Warren, PM Dahan, A
Barnung SK, Treschow M, Borgbjerg FM: Respiratory depression following oral tramadol in a patient with impaired renal function. Pain 1997; 71:111–2Barnung, SK Treschow, M Borgbjerg, FM
Rothe KF, Brather R: Postoperative Atemdepressionen im Zusammenhang mit Tramadol-infusionsnarkose. Anaesthesist 1983; 32:88Rothe, KF Brather, R
Hillel AD, Benninger M, Blitzer A, Crumley R, Flint P, Kashima HK, Sanders I, Schaefer S: Evaluation and management of bilateral vocal cord immobility. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 121:760–5Hillel, AD Benninger, M Blitzer, A Crumley, R Flint, P Kashima, HK Sanders, I Schaefer, S
Montiel GC, Quadrelli SA, Roncoroni AJ, Vidal R: Treatment of respiratory insufficiency secondary to vocal cord bilateral paralysis with continuous positive pressure. Medicina 1994; 54:241–4Montiel, GC Quadrelli, SA Roncoroni, AJ Vidal, R
Bennett JA, Abrams JT, Van Riper DF, Horrow JC: Difficult or impossible ventilation after sufentanil-induced anesthesia is caused primarily by vocal cord closure. Anesthesiology 1997; 87:1070–4Bennett, JA Abrams, JT Van Riper, DF Horrow, JC
Arandia HY, Patil VU: Glottic closure following large doses of fentanyl. Anesthesiology 1987; 66:574–9Arandia, HY Patil, VU
Scamman FL: Fentanyl-O2-N2O rigidity and pulmonary compliance. Anest Analg 1983; 62:332–4Scamman, FL
Lalley PM: Mu-opioid receptor agonist effects on medullary respiratory neurons in the cat: Evidence for involvement in certain types of ventilatory disturbances. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2003; 285:R1287–304Lalley, PM
Vankova ME, Weinger MB, Chen DY, Bronson JB, Motis V, Koob GF: Role central mu, delta-1, and kappa-1 opioid receptors in opioid-induced muscle rigidity in the rat. Anesthesiology 1996; 85:574–83Vankova, ME Weinger, MB Chen, DY Bronson, JB Motis, V Koob, GF
Ossowska K, Wolfarth S: Muscle rigidity induced by the opioid analgesic tramadol, but not by the non-opioid flupirtine. Pol J Pharmacol 1994; 46:61–5Ossowska, K Wolfarth, S
Driessen B, Reimann W, Giertz H: Effect of the central analgesic tramadol on the uptake and release of noradrenaline and dopamine in vitro  . Br J Pharmacol 1993; 108:806–11Driessen, B Reimann, W Giertz, H
Raffa BB, Friderichs E, Reimann W, Shank RP, Codd EE, Vaught JL: Opioid and nonopioid components independently contribute to the mechanism of action of tramadol, an “atypical” opioid analgesic. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1992; 260:276–85Raffa, BB Friderichs, E Reimann, W Shank, RP Codd, EE Vaught, JL
Hennies HH, Friderichs E, Schneider J: Receptor binding, analgesic and antitussive potency of tramadol and other selected opioids. Arzneim Forsch 1988; 38:877–80Hennies, HH Friderichs, E Schneider, J
Kubesova H, Holik J, Bogrova I, Syslova D: Pain in elderly patients and aspects of its therapy. Cas Lek Cesk 2001; 140:291–4Kubesova, H Holik, J Bogrova, I Syslova, D
Fig. 1. Fiberoptic bronchoscope vision. Vocal cord closure during inspiratory phase after administration of high doses of tramadol for postoperative pain control (  a  ), progressive opening 4 min after giving naloxone (  b  ), and ulterior improvement in opening 20 min later (  c  ). 
Fig. 1. Fiberoptic bronchoscope vision. Vocal cord closure during inspiratory phase after administration of high doses of tramadol for postoperative pain control (  a  ), progressive opening 4 min after giving naloxone (  b  ), and ulterior improvement in opening 20 min later (  c  ). 
Fig. 1. Fiberoptic bronchoscope vision. Vocal cord closure during inspiratory phase after administration of high doses of tramadol for postoperative pain control (  a  ), progressive opening 4 min after giving naloxone (  b  ), and ulterior improvement in opening 20 min later (  c  ). 
×