Free
Education  |   May 2004
Cerebral Oxygen Extraction and Autoregulation during Extracorporeal Whole Body Hyperthermia in Humans
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Olaf L. Cremer, M.D.
    *
  • Jan C. Diephuis, M.D.
  • Hanneke van Soest, M.D.
  • Paul H. B. Vaessen, R.N.
    §
  • Marcel G. J. Bruens
    §
  • Pim J. Hennis, M.D., Ph.D.
  • Cor J. Kalkman, M.D., Ph.D.
    ||
  • *Resident Anesthesiologist, † Staff Anesthesiologist, § Nurse Anesthetist, ||Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, ‡ Resident Physician, Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Center.
Article Information
Education
Education   |   May 2004
Cerebral Oxygen Extraction and Autoregulation during Extracorporeal Whole Body Hyperthermia in Humans
Anesthesiology 5 2004, Vol.100, 1101-1107. doi:
Anesthesiology 5 2004, Vol.100, 1101-1107. doi:
WHOLE body hyperthermia has been used since the mid-1960s for the treatment of malignant illnesses, with variable therapeutic effects. Recently, it has also been explored for use in infectious diseases. 1–3 Whole body hyperthermia has been induced clinically with warm contact media (such as water, water-heated suits or mats, hot air), infrared radiation, or extracorporeal methods. 4–8 Recently, a venovenous extracorporeal method of whole body heating was developed that allows homogenous distribution of heat and precise control of temperature gradients. 9,10 Although a number of studies report that whole body hyperthermia is a safe procedure, 4–7 there is still concern about possible neurologic sequelae of cerebral hyperthermia. In heat stroke, loss of thermoregulatory capacity is associated with a disturbed level of consciousness, brain edema, and a high mortality if the temperature exceeds 40°C. 11 However, during therapeutic whole body hyperthermia, central temperatures of 41.8°C are intentionally applied. In this setting, the development of brain edema, intracerebral hemorrhage, intracranial hypertension, and transient central nervous system dysfunction have been reported. 3,7,12–14 Despite these observations, the cerebral pathophysiologic effects of temperature increase have poorly been studied in humans.
In animals, hyperthermia induces various toxic cerebral responses, 15,16 and resting cerebral oxygen and glucose consumption seem to increase, although the magnitude of these metabolic alterations show considerable regional heterogeneity. 17–20 A cerebral blood flow increase has frequently been observed in this setting and is generally believed to be related to increased metabolic demand. 20–22 However, few published studies have formally assessed cerebral metabolic coupling or autoregulation during hyperthermia in both humans and animals, and the results are conflicting. 21,23,24 This issue may be of clinical importance because when metabolism increases and cerebral vasomotor responses become impaired during hyperthermia, it could imply that fever temporarily predisposes patients to neurologic injury if wide perturbations of blood pressure should occur.
The current study aimed to determine the effects of varying temperatures (in a range of approximately 36.6°–41.8°C) on cerebral oxygen extraction and pressure–flow autoregulation. For this, we studied patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection who were subjected to experimental treatment with whole body hyperthermia, using an extracorporeal heating circuit.
Materials and Methods
Patients
This study was approved by the ethics committee of the University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands, and written informed consent was obtained. Patients were enrolled in the current protocol ancillary to a pilot study investigating the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal whole body hyperthermia (EWBH) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection. This pilot study was designed after encouraging hepatitis C viral load–related observations during the experimental use of systemic hyperthermia for treatment of human immuno-deficiency virus infection. 1–3 Patients aged 18–65 yr with chronic hepatitis C virus infection, genotype 1, were eligible for study inclusion. All patients had failed to show a sustained response to interferon alfa therapy and were required to have Child-Pugh classification A (no or minimal cirrhosis). 25 Patients were screened for central nervous system abnormalities, cardiac disease, pulmonary disease, and other major liver or renal disease. Patients were ineligible if abnormalities were present. A history of substance abuse was not an exclusion criterion.
Thirteen patients were treated between August 2001 and April 2002 with a single session of EWBH (series A). Six additional patients and four patients from the first series were (re)treated between December 2002 and February 2003 (series B). Treatment again consisted of a single session of EWBH but was now followed after 6 weeks by the initiation of 12 months of antiviral therapy with interferon alfa and ribavirin.
EWBH Procedure and Anesthesia Management
All EWBH treatments were performed by the same team of anesthesiologists and perfusionists throughout the study period. General anesthesia was induced with propofol–fentanyl–rocuronium and was maintained using a target-controlled propofol infusion pump (Diprifusor; Astra-Zeneca, Ridderkerk, The Netherlands). The trachea was intubated, and the lungs were ventilated with oxygen in air. During a session of EWBH, core temperature was increased in approximately 90 min to a target of 41.8°± 0.15°C under general anesthesia, using an extracorporeal heater–cooler device with a bifemoral venovenous circuit (TEMET System 1000; First Circle Medical, Minneapolis, MN). Before the start of the extra-corporeal bypass, patients were heparinized. After 120 ± 10 min of hyperthermic plateau, patients were cooled to 39°C before the bypass was discontinued. After the procedure, patients were transported to the intensive care unit. Propofol sedation was continued until planned extubation 2–4 h later.
Anesthetic management differed with respect to two important aspects in patients treated during EWBH series A and B. First, during treatment series A, patients were ventilated in a volume-controlled manner to maintain normocapnia at a target end-tidal carbon dioxide of approximately 4.0% during normothermia, and the ventilator settings subsequently remained unchanged throughout the procedure. This resulted in a high end-tidal carbon dioxide but a normocapnic uncorrected arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), measured at 37°C, during hyperthermia (alphastat principle). During treatment series B, patients were also normocapnic during normothermia, but as body temperature was increased, the minute volume of ventilation was gradually increased to maintain an approximately normal end-tidal carbon dioxide, resulting in a hypocapnic uncorrected PaCO2during hyperthermia (pH-stat principle). 26 Second, during EWBH treatment series A, changes in the propofol infusion target were made at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. During treatment series B, a routine gradual increase of the propofol infusion target by 1.5 mg/l during warming was implemented in the anesthesia protocol. This routine adjustment of the infusion rate was deemed necessary because blood concentrations of propofol decreased as temperature was increased.
Monitoring
Invasive monitoring of systemic and pulmonary hemo-dynamics was used. Temperature monitoring sites included the pulmonary artery, the nasopharynx, the esophagus, and the rectum. In addition, a right retrograde jugular bulb catheter (5.5-French Opticath Oximetrix; Abbott Critical Care Systems, Chicago, IL) was used to measure jugular venous temperature, pressure, oxy-hemoglobin saturation, and lactate. An arterial to jugular venous difference of lactate less than −0.37 mm was considered abnormal. 27 The position of the catheter tip was verified by a lateral skull x-ray. The blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery was measured using transcranial pulsed Doppler ultrasonography (2-MHz probe, Multi-Dop T; DWL, Sipplingen/Bodensee, Germany). The position of the ultrasound transducers was fixed using a metal head frame (series A) or a special headband (series B). Mean peak flow velocities from both hemispheres were averaged. Data were stored at 0.1 Hz and at 250 Hz for off-line analysis using POLY Physiologic Analysis Package (Inspektor Research Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Laboratory parameters were measured at normothermic baseline, at fixed intervals during warming, and at hyperthermic plateau.
Autoregulation Testing
Static autoregulation tests were performed during normothermic flow over the extracorporeal bypass circuit (T1) and during hyperthermic plateau (T2), using a ramped phenylephrine infusion. The static rate of auto-regulation was calculated as the ratio of the percent change in cerebrovascular resistance by the percent change in mean arterial pressure, with cerebrovascular resistance estimated as the ratio of mean arterial pressure by cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV). 28–30 A static rate of autoregulation of 1 indicates perfect adaptation of cerebral resistance vessels to changes in mean arterial pressure, whereas a value close to 0 indicates complete absence of cerebrovascular reactivity. In addition to these formal tests of static pressure–flow auto-regulation, transient hyperemic response tests were performed at fixed stages during the EWBH procedure. Transient hyperemic response testing involves measurement of changes in middle cerebral artery flow velocity during and after the release of a 10-s compression of the ipsilateral common carotid artery. If cerebral autoregulation is intact, the decrease in perfusion pressure in the middle cerebral artery at the onset of compression triggers vasodilatation in the distal vascular bed, resulting in a transient increase in the flow velocity after the release of compression. The transient hyperemic response ratio (THRR) was calculated as the ratio of the mean peak flow velocity of the Doppler waveform immediately after the release of compression by that of the waveform immediately preceding the compression. A THRR value close to 1 indicates absence of a vascular response, whereas higher values indicate increasing levels of vasoreactivity. The THRR reflects changes in the static rate of autoregulation and provides a valid measure for assessing graded impairments of cerebral pressure–flow autoregulation. 30,31 
Statistical Analysis
Systemic and cerebral physiologic parameters recorded during normothermia and hyperthermia were compared using paired-samples t  tests. In addition, changes in these parameters from T1 to T2 were tested for differences between treatment series A and B using independent-samples t  tests. With respect to cerebrovascular reactivity testing, the THRR was considered the primary measure of pressure–flow autoregulation in this study because transient hyperemic response tests could be repeatedly performed during various stages of the EWBH procedure. Therefore, the THRR was expected to give a more precise estimate of cerebral vasomotor responses than the static rate of autoregulation. Because changes in PaCO2, mean arterial pressure, and propofol blood concentration during EWBH treatment might confound the relation between temperature and pressureflow autoregulation, 29,31 a mixed-effects regression analysis was used to model possible confounding by these parameters, taking into account the nesting of repeated observations within an individual. To allow for differences in vasoreactivity between individual subjects, an intercept was included in the model as a random effect. The crude and adjusted effect estimates of the association of temperature with the THRR are presented with 95% confidence intervals. Data in the text are presented as mean ± SD.
Results
Thirteen sessions of EWBH treatment were performed during series A, and 10 sessions were performed during series B, in a total of 19 patients (age 44 ± 9 yr, 14 [74%] male). Table 1shows various anesthetic management–related parameters at T1 (normothermia) and T2 (hyperthermia). End-tidal carbon dioxide and uncorrected PaCO2values show the effect of the changes in ventilation management that were introduced between treatment series A and B. Likewise, the differences in propofol infusion targets show the effect of protocol changes between series A and B. The calculated target blood concentration of propofol grossly overestimated the true blood concentration at T2.
Table 1. Anesthetic Management–related Parameters during Extracorporeal Whole Body Hyperthermia
Image not available
Table 1. Anesthetic Management–related Parameters during Extracorporeal Whole Body Hyperthermia
×
Table 2shows systemic parameters. During hyperthermia, systemic vascular resistance decreased considerably, despite the use of increased infusion rates of phenylephrine. As a consequence, cardiac output and heart rate increased, and mean arterial pressure decreased. Simultaneously, systemic oxygen consumption increased by 47% and 23% for treatment series A and B, respectively. The hemodynamic and metabolic changes were more outspoken during treatment series A (high–carbon dioxide group) than during series B (low–carbon dioxide group), although these differences did not reach statistical significance.
Table 2. Systemic Physiologic Parameters during Extracorporeal Whole Body Hyperthermia
Image not available
Table 2. Systemic Physiologic Parameters during Extracorporeal Whole Body Hyperthermia
×
Table 3shows cerebral parameters. For series A, cerebral oxygen extraction (arterial to jugular venous difference of oxygen content) decreased 2.2-fold, compared with a simultaneous 2.0-fold increase in CBFV. For series B, cerebral oxygen extraction decreased 1.6-fold, and CBFV increased 1.5-fold. For all 23 treatment sessions of series A and B combined, jugular venous oxygen saturations below 50% were observed in two instances at T1 and never at T2. Signs of cerebral lactate production (arterial to jugular venous difference of lactate < −0.37 mM) were observed in three instances at T1 and in five instances at T2. The simultaneous occurrence of jugular venous oxygen desaturation and abnormally low arterial to jugular venous difference of lactate was not observed. Figure 1shows the cerebral and systemic arterial to venous oxygen extraction at different temperatures during the EWBH procedures. For both treatment series A and B, the systemic oxygen extraction decreased linearly with increasing temperature. In contrast, cerebral oxygen extraction decreased in a nonlinear manner, with the greatest decrease occurring at temperatures above approximately 40°C.
Table 3. Cerebral Physiologic Parameters during Extracorporeal Whole Body Hyperthermia
Image not available
Table 3. Cerebral Physiologic Parameters during Extracorporeal Whole Body Hyperthermia
×
Fig. 1. Cerebral and systemic oxygen extraction during extracorporeal whole body hyperthermia. Closed circles  = arterial to jugular venous difference of oxygen content; squares  = arterial to mixed venous difference of oxygen content (AVDo2). Values are presented as mean ± 95% confidence interval.
Fig. 1. Cerebral and systemic oxygen extraction during extracorporeal whole body hyperthermia. Closed circles 
	= arterial to jugular venous difference of oxygen content; squares 
	= arterial to mixed venous difference of oxygen content (AVDo2). Values are presented as mean ± 95% confidence interval.
Fig. 1. Cerebral and systemic oxygen extraction during extracorporeal whole body hyperthermia. Closed circles  = arterial to jugular venous difference of oxygen content; squares  = arterial to mixed venous difference of oxygen content (AVDo2). Values are presented as mean ± 95% confidence interval.
×
Table 4shows measures of cerebrovascular reactivity. Cerebral pressure–flow autoregulation was assessed by 37 static autoregulation tests during 17 EWBH procedures and by 220 transient hyperemic response tests during 14 procedures. The static rate of autoregulation and the THRR significantly decreased from T1 to T2 in both series A and B. Figure 2shows the THRR at fixed temperatures during the EWBH procedures (series A and B combined). The THRR did not decrease until the jugular venous blood temperature reached approximately 40°C. Subsequently, the crude mixed-effects regression model (table 5) showed a decrease in the THRR of 0.07 (95% confidence interval, 0.05–0.09) per degree temperature increase (P  = 0.000). After adjustment of the crude association for variations in PaCO2, mean arterial pressure, and propofol blood concentration during the EWBH procedure, the association remained (P  = 0.000).
Table 4. Cerebral Vasomotor Responses during Extracorporeal Whole Body Hyperthermia
Image not available
Table 4. Cerebral Vasomotor Responses during Extracorporeal Whole Body Hyperthermia
×
Table 5. Mixed-effects Regression Models for 220 Transient Hyperemic Response Tests in 14 Patients
Image not available
Table 5. Mixed-effects Regression Models for 220 Transient Hyperemic Response Tests in 14 Patients
×
Fig. 2. Transient hyperemic response ratio (THRR) during extracorporeal whole body hyperthermia. Values are presented as mean ± 95% confidence interval.
Fig. 2. Transient hyperemic response ratio (THRR) during extracorporeal whole body hyperthermia. Values are presented as mean ± 95% confidence interval.
Fig. 2. Transient hyperemic response ratio (THRR) during extracorporeal whole body hyperthermia. Values are presented as mean ± 95% confidence interval.
×
Discussion
Experimental treatment using EWBH in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection under propofol anesthesia resulted in a decreased cerebral oxygen extraction that was accompanied by an increase in CBFV of a similar magnitude. These effects were more pronounced when end-tidal carbon dioxide was allowed to increase during warming (series A), compared with when end-tidal carbon dioxide was more rigidly maintained (series B). Second, heating resulted in impaired cerebrovascular responses to both a vasoconstrictor stimulus (static autoregulation testing) and a vasodilator stimulus (transient hyperemic response testing), indicating impaired pressure–flow autoregulation. This effect remained after adjustment for changes in PaCO2, mean arterial pressure, and propofol blood concentration. Together with systemic findings, these data indicate that a transient partial vasoparalysis develops during profound hyperthermia.
There are several methodologic issues that must be discussed. First, we measured arterial to jugular venous difference of oxygen content and found an apparent decrease in cerebral oxygen extraction. However, this could be a spurious finding if cerebrovenous blood would be grossly contaminated with extracerebral venous blood, known to have a higher oxygen saturation, during hyperthermia. In the current study, of 164 fiber-optic jugular venous oxygen saturation readings, 106 were verified by cooximetry using a laboratory-based blood gas analyzer. Cooximetry values were on average 3.5 ± 7.4% higher than fiberoptic values, and these differences were independent of temperature. These slightly higher values may indeed be explained by admixture of extracerebral blood when a sample is actively drawn from the jugular bulb catheter. 32 Because this effect was still apparent and independent of temperature, we consider it unlikely that gross contamination occurred during hyperthermia. Second, the reduction of cerebral oxygen extraction was accompanied by an increase in CBFV by a factor of almost equal magnitude. One interpretation of these observations is that cerebral oxygen consumption did not change appreciably during hyperthermia. However, the increase in peak flow velocity may have underestimated the true increase in erythrocyte flux during hyperthermia. This could have occurred if the insonated segment of the middle cerebral artery had increased in diameter over time. Studies that have specifically looked at the cross-sectional area of the middle cerebral artery have concluded that the diameter of this large vessel is grossly unaffected by changes in temperature, PaCO2, and blood pressure. 33–37 Also, changes in hematocrit and blood viscosity in theory may confound the relation between peak flow velocity and erythrocyte flux. An in vitro  study examining the effect of varying temperature (in a range of 19°–37°C) and hematocrit (in a range of 0.05–0.54) showed that the linear relation between flow and velocity was not affected. 38 Another study in anesthetized patients reported on the effect of a sudden decrease in hematocrit from 0.38 to 0.30 and concluded that CBFV well reflects true cerebral blood flow changes after hemodilution. 39 In the current study, the effect of hemodilution by the circuit priming had stabilized before the first (normothermic) measurements. Nonetheless, we cannot rule out that small increases in middle cerebral artery diameter occurred during either EWBH series A or EWBH series B, which would result in a significant underestimation of true erythrocyte flux.
The current data indicate that the cerebrovascular bed during hyperthermia is still responsive to a dilatory stimulus, such as a brief carotid compression, at temperatures up to approximately 40°C (fig. 2). At higher temperatures, however, we found that cerebral pressureflow autoregulation becomes progressively impaired. There are few studies assessing cerebral vasomotor responses during whole body hyperthermia, and the ones that are available have shown conflicting results. A study in dogs concluded that the main cerebral autoregulation system is paralyzed during whole body hyperthermia at 41.5°C. 21 Similarly, a recent study in humans has shown an increased pressure–flow dependency during an inflow of hyperthermic blood into the brain during rewarming from hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. 24 These reports of hyperthermia-induced cerebral vasoparalysis contrast with an animal experiment that indicated that the dilated cerebrovascular bed during hyperthermia is still responsive to indomethacin as a constrictor stimulus. 20 This finding, as well as the results of the current study, suggests that hyperthermia-induced vasoparalysis is partial rather than complete. Furthermore, the association between temperature and loss of cerebrovascular reactivity may be nonlinear, as suggested by figure 2and by a report of improved dynamic autoregulation during a 0.4°C temperature increase in awake human volunteers submersed in hyperthermic baths. 23 The results of the adjusted mixed-effects regression analysis suggest that the THRR becomes also increasingly depressed as PaCO2increases, mean arterial pressure decreases, and propofol blood concentration increases, although none of these effects reached statistical significance (table 5). The current findings may have clinical implications, as transient cerebral vasoparalysis during periods of induced hyperthermia or fever could potentially predispose to neurologic injury. Although the blood–brain barrier is most likely grossly preserved at temperatures below 42–43°C, 21,22 it has been suggested that brain edema may occur easily when arterial blood pressure fluctuates excessively and cerebral autoregulation is absent.
In conclusion, whole body hyperthermia is associated with decreased cerebral oxygen extraction and increased cerebral blood flow velocities in patients under propofol anesthesia. These findings are more marked when end-tidal carbon dioxide is allowed to increase compared with when it is more rigidly controlled. In addition, hyperthermia is associated with impaired cerebrovascular responses to both blood pressure increase and carotid occlusion, indicating that transient partial cerebral vasoparalysis develops when temperature exceeds approximately 40°C.
Special Note:  The research presented in this article was performed as an ancillary protocol to pilot trials on the safety and efficacy of extracorporeal whole body hyperthermia for treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection. This project has been halted by the Utrecht University Medical Center after an internal investigation concluded that the principal investigator of the therapeutic trials had failed to report serious side effects, in particular peripheral neuropathy, to the hospital’s medical ethics committee and that funds had not been properly declared from personal agreements with the commercial study sponsor. The authors related to this manuscript have not been implicated with respect to these issues.
The authors thank John C. Drummond, M.D., F.R.C.P.C. (Professor and Chair, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego, California), and Gert W. van Dijk, M.D., Ph.D. (Staff Neurologist, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands), for valuable suggestions and comments while reviewing the manuscript.
References
Zablow A, Shecterle LM, Dorian R, Kelly T, Fletcher S, Foreman M, Myers R, Holton M, Sanfilippo L, St Cyr J: Extracorporeal whole body hyperthermia treatment of HIV patients: A feasibility study. Int J Hyperthermia 1997; 13:577–86
Ash SR, Steinhart CR, Curfman MF, Gingrich CH, Sapir DA, Ash EL, Fausset JM, Yatvin MB: Extracorporeal whole body hyperthermia treatments for HIV infection and AIDS. ASAIO J 1997; 43:M830–8
Alonso K, Pontiggia P, Sabato A, Calvi G, Curto FC, de Bartolomei E, Nardi C, Cereda P: Systemic hyperthermia in the treatment of HIV-related disseminated Kaposi’s sarcoma: Long-term follow-up of patients treated with low-flow extra-corporeal perfusion hyperthermia. Am J Clin Oncol 1994; 17:353–9
Cole DR, Pung J, Kim YD, Berman RA, Cole DF: Systemic thermotherapy (whole body hyperthermia). Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm 1979; 17:329–33
Bull JM, Lees D, Schuette W, Whang-Peng J, Smith R, Bynum G, Atkinson ER, Gottdiener JS, Gralnick HR, Shawker TH, DeVita VT Jr: Whole body hyperthermia: A phase-I trial of a potential adjuvant to chemotherapy. Ann Intern Med 1979; 90:317–23
Robins HI, Dennis WH, Neville AJ, Shecterle LM, Martin PA, Grossman J, Davis TE, Neville SR, Gillis WK, Rusy BF: A nontoxic system for 41.8 degrees C whole-body hyperthermia: Results of a phase I study using a radiant heat device. Cancer Res 1985; 45:3937–44
Kerner T, Deja M, Ahlers O, Loffel J, Hildebrandt B, Wust P, Gerlach H, Riess H: Whole body hyperthermia: A secure procedure for patients with various malignancies? Intensive Care Med 1999; 25:959–65
Parks LC, Minaberry D, Smith DP, Neely WA: Treatment of far-advanced bronchogenic carcinoma by extracorporeally induced systemic hyperthermia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1979; 78:883–92
Vertrees RA, Tao W, Pencil SD, Sites JP, Althoff DP, Zwischenberger JB: Induction of whole body hyperthermia with venovenous perfusion. ASAIO J 1996; 42:250–4
Vertrees RA, Bidani A, Deyo DJ, Tao W, Zwischenberger JB: Venovenous perfusion-induced systemic hyperthermia: Hemodynamics, blood flow, and thermal gradients. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70:644–52
Yaqub B, Al Deeb S: Heat strokes: Aetiopathogenesis, neurological characteristics, treatment and outcome. J Neurol Sci 1998; 156:144–51
Ostrow S, Van Echo D, Whitacre M, Aisner J, Simon R, Wiernik PH: Physiologic response and toxicity in patients undergoing whole-body hyperthermia for the treatment of cancer. Cancer Treat Rep 1981; 65:323–5
Eisler K, Landauer B, Hipp R, Kolb E, Lange J, Siewert JR, Zanker K, Blumel G: Experiences with therapeutic whole-body hyperthermia (in German). Anaesthesist 1985; 34:299–303
Lees DE, Kim YD, Bull JM, Whang-Peng J, Schuette W, Smith R, Macnamara TE: Anesthetic management of whole-body hyperthermia for the treatment of cancer. Anesthesiology 1980; 52:418–28
Ginsberg MD, Busto R: Combating hyperthermia in acute stroke: A significant clinical concern. Stroke 1998; 29:529–34
Chatzipanteli K, Alonso OF, Kraydieh S, Dietrich WD: Importance of posttraumatic hypothermia and hyperthermia on the inflammatory response after fluid percussion brain injury: Biochemical and immunocytochemical studies. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2000; 20:531–42
McCulloch J, Savaki HE, Jehle J, Sokoloff L: Local cerebral glucose utilization in hypothermic and hyperthermic rats. J Neurochem 1982; 39:255–8
Mickley GA, Cobb BL, Farrell ST: Brain hyperthermia alters local cerebral glucose utilization: A comparison of hyperthermic agents. Int J Hyperthermia 1997; 13:99–114
Michenfelder JD, Milde JH, Katusic ZS: Postischemic canine cerebral blood flow is coupled to cerebral metabolic rate. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1991; 11:611–6
Busija DW, Leffler CW, Pourcyrous M: Hyperthermia increases cerebral metabolic rate and blood flow in neonatal pigs. Am J Physiol 1988; 255:H343–6
Katsumura H, Kabuto M, Hosotani K, Handa Y, Kobayashi H, Kubota T: The influence of total body hyperthermia on brain haemodynamics and blood-brain barrier in dogs. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1995; 135:62–9
Ohmoto Y, Fujisawa H, Ishikawa T, Koizumi H, Matsuda T, Ito H: Sequential changes in cerebral blood flow, early neuropathological consequences and blood-brain barrier disruption following radiofrequency-induced localized hyperthermia in the rat. Int J Hyperthermia 1996; 12:321–34
Doering TJ, Aaslid R, Steuernagel B, Brix J, Niederstadt C, Breull A, Schneider B, Fischer GC: Cerebral autoregulation during whole-body hypothermia and hyperthermia stimulus. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 78:33–8
Diephuis JC, Balt J, van Dijk D, Moons KG, Knape JT: Effect of rewarming speed during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass on cerebral pressure-flow relation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002; 46:283–8
Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R: Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 1973; 60:646–9
Sitzwohl C, Kettner SC, Reinprecht A, Dietrich W, Klimscha W, Fridrich P, Sladen RN, Illievich UM: The arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide gradient increases with uncorrected but not with temperature-corrected PaCO2 determination during mild to moderate hypothermia. Anesth Analg 1998; 86:1131–6
Metz C, Holzschuh M, Bein T, Woertgen C, Rothoerl R, Kallenbach B, Taeger K, Brawanski A: Monitoring of cerebral oxygen metabolism in the jugular bulb: Reliability of unilateral measurements in severe head injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1998; 18:332–43
Panerai RB: Assessment of cerebral pressure autoregulation in humans: A review of measurement methods. Physiol Meas 1998; 19:305–38
Strebel S, Lam AM, Matta B, Mayberg TS, Aaslid R, Newell DW: Dynamic and static cerebral autoregulation during isoflurane, desflurane, and propofol anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1995; 83:66–76
Tibble RK, Girling KJ, Mahajan RP: A comparison of the transient hyperemic response test and the static autoregulation test to assess graded impairment in cerebral autoregulation during propofol, desflurane, and nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2001; 93:171–6
Mahajan RP, Cavill G, Simpson EJ: Reliability of the transient hyperemic response test in detecting changes in cerebral autoregulation induced by the graded variations in end-tidal carbon dioxide. Anesth Analg 1998; 87:843–9
Schell RM, Cole DJ: Cerebral monitoring: Jugular venous oximetry. Anesth Analg 2000; 90:559–66
van der Linden J, Priddy R, Ekroth R, Lincoln C, Pugsley W, Scallan M, Tyden H: Cerebral perfusion and metabolism during profound hypothermia in children: A study of middle cerebral artery ultrasonic variables and cerebral extraction of oxygen. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991; 102:103–14
Giller CA, Bowman G, Dyer H, Mootz L, Krippner W: Cerebral arterial diameters during changes in blood pressure and carbon dioxide during craniotomy. Neurosurgery 1993; 32:737–41
Bishop CC, Powell S, Rutt D, Browse NL: Transcranial Doppler measurement of middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity: A validation study. Stroke 1986; 17:913–5
Serrador JM, Picot PA, Rutt BK, Shoemaker JK, Bondar RL: MRI measures of middle cerebral artery diameter in conscious humans during simulated orthostasis. Stroke 2000; 31:1672–8
ter Minassian A, Melon E, Leguerinel C, Lodi CA, Bonnet F, Beydon L: Changes in cerebral blood flow during PaCO2 variations in patients with severe closed head injury: Comparison between the Fick and transcranial Doppler methods. J Neurosurg 1998; 88:996–1001
Paut O, Bissonnette B: Effects of temperature and haematocrit on the relationships between blood flow velocity and blood flow in a vessel of fixed diameter. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:277–9
Bruder N, Cohen B, Pellissier D, Francois G: The effect of hemodilution on cerebral blood flow velocity in anesthetized patients. Anesth Analg 1998; 86:320–4
Fig. 1. Cerebral and systemic oxygen extraction during extracorporeal whole body hyperthermia. Closed circles  = arterial to jugular venous difference of oxygen content; squares  = arterial to mixed venous difference of oxygen content (AVDo2). Values are presented as mean ± 95% confidence interval.
Fig. 1. Cerebral and systemic oxygen extraction during extracorporeal whole body hyperthermia. Closed circles 
	= arterial to jugular venous difference of oxygen content; squares 
	= arterial to mixed venous difference of oxygen content (AVDo2). Values are presented as mean ± 95% confidence interval.
Fig. 1. Cerebral and systemic oxygen extraction during extracorporeal whole body hyperthermia. Closed circles  = arterial to jugular venous difference of oxygen content; squares  = arterial to mixed venous difference of oxygen content (AVDo2). Values are presented as mean ± 95% confidence interval.
×
Fig. 2. Transient hyperemic response ratio (THRR) during extracorporeal whole body hyperthermia. Values are presented as mean ± 95% confidence interval.
Fig. 2. Transient hyperemic response ratio (THRR) during extracorporeal whole body hyperthermia. Values are presented as mean ± 95% confidence interval.
Fig. 2. Transient hyperemic response ratio (THRR) during extracorporeal whole body hyperthermia. Values are presented as mean ± 95% confidence interval.
×
Table 1. Anesthetic Management–related Parameters during Extracorporeal Whole Body Hyperthermia
Image not available
Table 1. Anesthetic Management–related Parameters during Extracorporeal Whole Body Hyperthermia
×
Table 2. Systemic Physiologic Parameters during Extracorporeal Whole Body Hyperthermia
Image not available
Table 2. Systemic Physiologic Parameters during Extracorporeal Whole Body Hyperthermia
×
Table 3. Cerebral Physiologic Parameters during Extracorporeal Whole Body Hyperthermia
Image not available
Table 3. Cerebral Physiologic Parameters during Extracorporeal Whole Body Hyperthermia
×
Table 4. Cerebral Vasomotor Responses during Extracorporeal Whole Body Hyperthermia
Image not available
Table 4. Cerebral Vasomotor Responses during Extracorporeal Whole Body Hyperthermia
×
Table 5. Mixed-effects Regression Models for 220 Transient Hyperemic Response Tests in 14 Patients
Image not available
Table 5. Mixed-effects Regression Models for 220 Transient Hyperemic Response Tests in 14 Patients
×