Free
Meeting Abstracts  |   February 1995
Hypoxic Contraction of Isolated Rabbit Mesenteric Veins  : Contribution of Endothelium and Attenuation by Volatile Anesthetics
Author Notes
  • (Stadnicka) Research Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology.
  • (Stekiel) Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology.
  • (Hogan) Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology.
  • (Bosnjak) Professor, Departments of Anesthesiology and Physiology.
  • (Kampine) Professor and Chairman, Department of Anesthesiology; Professor of Physiology.
  • Received from the Departments of Anesthesiology and Physiology. Medical College of Wisconsin, and Zablockl Veterans Administration Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Submitted for publication August 31, 1993. Accepted for publication October 26, 1994. Supported by Anesthesiology Research Training grant GM 08377 and VA Medical Research Fund. Presented in part at the annual meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, New Orleans, Louisiana, October 17–21, 1992, and the Experimental Biology '93 Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, March 28-April 1, 1993.
  • Address correspondence to Dr. Stadnicka: Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226.
Article Information
Meeting Abstracts   |   February 1995
Hypoxic Contraction of Isolated Rabbit Mesenteric Veins  : Contribution of Endothelium and Attenuation by Volatile Anesthetics
Anesthesiology 2 1995, Vol.82, 550-558. doi:
Anesthesiology 2 1995, Vol.82, 550-558. doi:
Key words: Anesthetics, volatile: enflurane; halothane; isoflurane. Endothelium, vascular: endothelin; endothelium relaxing factor. Oxygen; hypoxia. Veins: mesenteric.
SYSTEMIC hypoxia produces multiple cardiovascular adaptations that lead to the redistribution of blood flow to organs with high oxygen demand. [1–4 ] Numerous in vitro studies have demonstrated that hypoxia also may exert a direct effect on blood vessels and contribute locally to changes in peripheral vascular tone. Inhalational anesthetics interfere with systemic hemodynamic and direct vascular responses to hypoxia, resulting in altered vascular reactivity [5 ] and impaired blood flow to various organs. [2,3,6 ] Anesthetic agents therefore compromise homeostatic adjustments during hypoxia.
Splanchnic capacitance vessels function as an active blood mobilization system under sympathetic control. Acute systemic hypoxia reduces splanchnic capacitance via mesenteric venoconstriction because of combined influences on the central nervous system, peripheral chemoreflex activation, and sympathetic efferent transmission. [4,5 ] This response is attenuated by volatile anesthetics, [7 ] which may affect the redistribution of circulating blood volume essential for homeostatic adjustments to hypoxia. Alternatively, hypoxia evoked mesenteric vasoconstriction may be in part responsible for nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia, [8 ] and volatile anesthetics may provide a protective effect against this phenomenon.
We have reported previously that mesenteric venoconstriction occurring during acute systemic hypoxia in intact rabbits is markedly reduced by inhaled halothane. [7 ] However, direct effects of hypoxia, or hypoxia in the presence of volatile anesthetics, on mesenteric veins are unknown.
The purpose of the current in vitro study was to determine whether short-term acute hypoxia has a direct vasoconstrictive effect on isolated small mesenteric veins of the rabbit, to evaluate the mechanism of the hypoxic response, and to examine the effects of halothane, isoflurane, and enflurane.
Materials and Methods
Experiments were performed on 268 rings of small (500–800 micro meter in diameter) veins isolated from mesentery of the terminal ileum of the rabbit. All experimental protocols and the animal use were approved by the Animal Care Committee of the Medical College of Wisconsin. Seventy-five male New Zealand white rabbits, weighing 1.53 plus/minus 0.02 kg were anesthetized with thiamylal (20 mg/kg, intravenous). The mesentery was excised and placed in a cold physiologic salt solution (PSS) of the following composition (in mM): NaCl 119, KCl 4.7, MgSO41,17, CaCl21.6, NaHCO327.8, NaH2PO41.18, EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) 0.026, HEPES (4-[2-hydroxyethyl]-1-piperazine-ethanesulfonic acid) 5.8, and glucose 5.5. The veins were dissected, cleaned of adherent tissue, and cut into 4-mm long segments (rings). In some rings, the endothelium was removed mechanically by inserting a 25-G hypodermic needle into the vascular lumen and gently rolling the vessels over a soft silastic plate moistened with PSS. Individual rings were suspended on Tungsten stirrups in 15-ml organ baths (Radnoti, Monrovia, CA) containing oxygenated (95% Oxygen2-5% CO2) PSS, maintained at pH 7.37–7.4 and 37 degrees Celsius. The PO2(500–600 mmHg) and PCO2(35–40 mmHg) in the bath solution were monitored frequently (ABL3, Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark). The isometric tension was measured via FTO3 force transducers (Grass, Quincy, MA) and recorded using Grass model 7 polygraph.
Experimental Protocol
A passive force that permitted maximum contraction of veins to 80 mM potassium (50 mg, equivalent to 0.5 mN and defined here as basal resting tension) was placed on each ring. The rings were allowed to equilibrate for 2 h and then contracted twice with potassium (80 mM KCl), to stabilize the vascular preparations. In some denuded veins, effectiveness of endothelium removal was verified histologically using silver nitrate and cobalt bromide staining. [9 ] In all vein rings, the presence or absence of functional endothelium was tested by determining the response to 104M acetylcholine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in 106M norepinephrine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) precontracted rings. Twenty percent to 50% relaxation was seen in endothelium-intact vessels, whereas no relaxation or a slight increase in tension was observed in the vessels without endothelium (Figure 1(c)).
Figure 1. Representative tracings showing the responses to hypoxia in mesenteric veins with and without endothelium:(a) 3 x 107M norepinephrine time control, (b) hypoxic contraction in a vein ring with endothelium, and no response in matching ring without endothelium, and (c) responses to 104M acetylcholine (ACh) in 106M norepinephrine contracted veins.
Figure 1. Representative tracings showing the responses to hypoxia in mesenteric veins with and without endothelium:(a) 3 x 107M norepinephrine time control, (b) hypoxic contraction in a vein ring with endothelium, and no response in matching ring without endothelium, and (c) responses to 104M acetylcholine (ACh) in 106M norepinephrine contracted veins.
Figure 1. Representative tracings showing the responses to hypoxia in mesenteric veins with and without endothelium:(a) 3 x 107M norepinephrine time control, (b) hypoxic contraction in a vein ring with endothelium, and no response in matching ring without endothelium, and (c) responses to 104M acetylcholine (ACh) in 106M norepinephrine contracted veins.
×
Hypoxia (10 min) was produced by replacing the gas mixture aerating organ baths with 95% Nitrogen2/5% CO2, decreasing P sub O2from 600 plus/minus 8.3 mmHg to 26 plus/minus 0.8 mmHg within 1 min. PCO2(34 plus/minus 1.0 mmHg) and pH (7.42 plus/minus 0.01) of the bath solution remained unchanged. Oxygen was reintroduced after 10 min in the continued presence of the precontracting agent, and the posthypoxic responses were recorded for an additional 3 min. After washouts, a 1-h recovery period (normoxia) was used to separate successive hypoxic episodes.
General Response to Hypoxia
Unstimulated (Quiescent) Veins. Veins with or without endothelium were exposed to two or three episodes of hypoxia (10 min), separated by 1-h intervals of normoxia.
Stimulated Veins. Veins with and without endothelium were precontracted with 3 x 107M norepinephrine (EC40). Hypoxia (10 min) was initiated during, arbitrarily chosen, third minute of contraction to agonist. In some experiments, hypoxia was conducted in absence of extracellular calcium, after 30-min preincubation of rings in Calcium2+-free PSS. Phenylephrine (3 x 10 6 M), prostaglandin PGF sub 20 (5 x 106M), or KCl (60 mM) also were used as precontracting agents.
Pharmacologic Evaluation of Hypoxic Response
Endothelium-intact veins precontracted with 3 x 10 sup -7 M norepinephrine were used to further characterize the hypoxic response. After control hypoxia and a period of recovery, the effects of the following pharmacologic agents were examined: alpha-adrenergic antagonist, phentolamine (5 x 10 sup -6 M, Regitine mesylate, Ciba-Geigy, Summit, NJ); beta-adrenergic antagonist, propranolol (10 sup -5 M, Sigma, St. Louis, MO); inhibitor of cyclooxygenase, indomethacin (105M, Sigma); inhibitor of lipoxygenase, nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA, 2 x 105M, Sigma); blocker of cell membrane voltage-gated calcium channels, nicardipine (105M, Sigma); a depleter of Calcium2+ in sarcoplasmic reticulum, ryanodine (5 x 10 sup 6 M, Sigma); inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME: 5 x 105M, Sigma); inhibitor of endothelin-converting enzyme, phosphoramidon (105to 103M, Sigma); antagonist of endothelin ETAreceptors on vascular smooth muscle, BQ-123 (106M, PED-3512-PI, Peptides International, Louisville, KY); and endothelin-I (109to 107M, Sigma). Hypoxia was repeated in the presence of individual drugs after 15–20-min exposure to these compounds. Stock solutions of all drugs, except indomethacin and NDGA, were prepared daily in distilled water. Indomethacin was dissolved in ethyl alcohol and NDGA in propylene glycol. The concentrations of all drugs are expressed as the final molar (M) concentrations in the bath solution.
Effects of Volatile Anesthetics on Hypoxic Response
The effects of halothane (Halocarbon, North Augusta, SC), isoflurane, and enflurane (Anaquest, Madison, WI) on the responses to hypoxia were examined in endothelium-intact veins. After control hypoxia, recovery, and 15-min equilibration with 1.0 MAC doses of individual anesthetics, hypoxia was repeated in the continued presence of either halothane, isoflurane, or enflurane. The 1.0 MAC values of volatile anesthetics for male New Zealand white rabbits as well as concentration of anesthetics in the bath solution are listed in the Table 1. Concentration of anesthetics in the baths was determined using gas chromatography (Sigma 3B gas chromatograph, Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT). In some experiments involving anesthetics, the responses to hypoxia were examined after increasing calcium concentration in the baths from 1.6 to 3.2 mM.
Table 1. Concentrations of Volatile Anesthetics in the Baths
Image not available
Table 1. Concentrations of Volatile Anesthetics in the Baths
×
Statistical Analysis
Tension (mg) was measured and reported as an increase above the initial basal resting tension. Data are expressed as mean plus/minus SEM. In all experiments n refers to the number of rabbits. The number of vascular rings also is reported. Data were analyzed by multiple analysis of variance for repeated measures with individual contrasts using the Super ANOVA statistical software produced by Abacus Corporation (Berkeley, CA) for Macintosh computers. Arc-sin transformations were performed on all percentage changes to ensure normal distribution of these values. The differences were considered to be statistically significant when P was less than 0.05.
Results
General Response to Hypoxia
Unstimulated Veins. Quiescent veins, with and without endothelium, showed no change in basal resting tension during repeated episodes of hypoxia.
Stimulated Veins. Denuded veins (n = 9 rabbits, 16 rings) demonstrated a greater contractile response to 3 x 10 sup - M norepinephrine compared with endothelium-intact veins (196 plus/minus 35 mg vs. 104 plus/minus 12 mg) but were unresponsive to hypoxia (Figure 1and Figure 2).
Figure 2. The profile of the hypoxic response in mesenteric veins with and without endothelium contracted with 3/10 [7 ] M norepinephrine: prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine (3 min-0 min), transient relaxation at the onset of hypoxia (1–2 min), maximum increase in contraction during hypoxia (5–10 min), and posthypoxic relaxation after reoxygenation (10–13 min). Norepinephrine time controls show higher sensitivity to norepinephrine in veins without endothelium (E) and time-dependent decay of contraction to norepinephrine in veins with endothelium (+E). Hypoxia augmented contraction to norepinephrine only in veins with endothelium (+E). Data are mean + SEM; n 9 rabbits, 16 rings in each group.
Figure 2. The profile of the hypoxic response in mesenteric veins with and without endothelium contracted with 3/10 [7] M norepinephrine: prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine (3 min-0 min), transient relaxation at the onset of hypoxia (1–2 min), maximum increase in contraction during hypoxia (5–10 min), and posthypoxic relaxation after reoxygenation (10–13 min). Norepinephrine time controls show higher sensitivity to norepinephrine in veins without endothelium (E) and time-dependent decay of contraction to norepinephrine in veins with endothelium (+E). Hypoxia augmented contraction to norepinephrine only in veins with endothelium (+E). Data are mean + SEM; n 9 rabbits, 16 rings in each group.
Figure 2. The profile of the hypoxic response in mesenteric veins with and without endothelium contracted with 3/10 [7 ] M norepinephrine: prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine (3 min-0 min), transient relaxation at the onset of hypoxia (1–2 min), maximum increase in contraction during hypoxia (5–10 min), and posthypoxic relaxation after reoxygenation (10–13 min). Norepinephrine time controls show higher sensitivity to norepinephrine in veins without endothelium (E) and time-dependent decay of contraction to norepinephrine in veins with endothelium (+E). Hypoxia augmented contraction to norepinephrine only in veins with endothelium (+E). Data are mean + SEM; n 9 rabbits, 16 rings in each group.
×
In endothelium-intact veins (16 matching rings from the same group of nine rabbits) norepinephrine time controls (15 min) demonstrated time-dependent decay of contraction to 3 x 107M norepinephrine (gradual decrease from 104 plus/minus 12 mg to 69 plus/minus 8 mg;Figure 1and Figure 2). Ten minutes hypoxia augmented contraction to 3 x 107M norepinephrine causing an increase in tension (from 140 plus/minus 10 mg to 343 plus/minus 36 mg). Hypoxic response had a characteristic triphasic profile (Figure 1). At the onset of hypoxic challenge, there was a transient (1–2 min) relaxation (decrease in tension from 140 plus/minus 10 mg to 98 plus/minus 13 mg), which was followed by augmentation of the contraction to norepinephrine sustained throughout the period of hypoxia. Reoxygenation in the continued presence of norepinephrine induced rapid posthypoxic relaxation (from maximum 343 plus/minus 36 mg to 128 plus/minus 19 mg). This pattern was reproducible during successive episodes of hypoxia (up to 6), separated with periods of normoxia. A similar pattern of hypoxic response was observed after preconstriction with phenylephrine (3 x 106M). Hypoxic response was inhibited by phentolamine (5 x 106M) and did not occur in the absence of calcium (incubation in Calcium2-free PSS). In veins precontracted with prostaglandin PGF20, hypoxia resulted in a transient (1–3 min) increase in contraction followed by a gradual decrease to the prehypoxic level. Both endothelium-intact and denuded veins precontracted with 60 mM KCl showed no further increase in contraction during hypoxia.
Pharmacologic Evaluation of Hypoxic Response
Hypoxic facilitation of contraction to norepinephrine was unaffected by propranolol (n = 5 rabbits, 14 vessels, data not shown), indomethacin (n = 5 rabbits, 18 vessels), NDGA (n = 5 rabbits, 14 vessels), or ryanodine (n = 5 rabbits, 13 vessels). Nicardipine (n = 5 rabbits, 13 vessels) depressed the hypoxic response by 86 plus/minus 5%. Indomethacin, NDGA, ryanodine, and nicardipine data are summarized in Figure 3.L-Name induced a threefold increase in basal contractile response to 2 x 10 sup -7 M norepinephrine (n = 5 rabbits, 24 vessels). However, in the presence of Sub L-NAME, the magnitude of hypoxic augmentation of contraction to norepinephrine was similar to that in control (Figure 4). Phosphoramidon depressed the hypoxic response by 82 plus/minus 8%(n = 8 rabbits, 16 vessels;Figure 5), and BQ-123 by 47 plus/minus 10%(n = 3 rabbits, 16 vessels;Figure 5). The exogenous endothelin-1 dose-response curves (109to 107M) were identical in the veins with and without endothelium (data not shown). Under normoxic conditions, precontraction of vein ring with either phenylephrine, norepinephrine, or KCl had no effect on the contraction to exogenous endothelin-1 (data not shown). BQ-123 attenuated contraction to exogenous endothelin-1 by 60 plus/minus 9%(data not shown).
Figure 3. Effects of indomethacin (10 sup -5 M), NDGA (2 x 105x M), ryanodine (5 x 10 sup -6 M), and nicardipine (105M) on the hypoxic response in endothelium-intact veins. Responses to hypoxia are expressed as percent change from prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine. Open bars represent control hypoxic response; hatched bars represent hypoxic response in the presence of drugs; n = 5 rabbits in each group;*P < 0.01 nicardipine versus control.
Figure 3. Effects of indomethacin (10 sup -5 M), NDGA (2 x 105x M), ryanodine (5 x 10 sup -6 M), and nicardipine (105M) on the hypoxic response in endothelium-intact veins. Responses to hypoxia are expressed as percent change from prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine. Open bars represent control hypoxic response; hatched bars represent hypoxic response in the presence of drugs; n = 5 rabbits in each group;*P < 0.01 nicardipine versus control.
Figure 3. Effects of indomethacin (10 sup -5 M), NDGA (2 x 105x M), ryanodine (5 x 10 sup -6 M), and nicardipine (105M) on the hypoxic response in endothelium-intact veins. Responses to hypoxia are expressed as percent change from prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine. Open bars represent control hypoxic response; hatched bars represent hypoxic response in the presence of drugs; n = 5 rabbits in each group;*P < 0.01 nicardipine versus control.
×
Figure 4. Effect ofL-NAME (5 x 105M) on the responses to hypoxia in endothelium-intact veins. Although prehypoxic contraction to 2 x 107M norepinephrine (open bars) was enhanced in the presence ofL-NAME, the magnitude of hypoxic augmentation of contraction to norepinephrine between control andL-NAME were similar (n = 5 rabbits, 24 rings), *P < 0.05 versus prehypoxic contraction. *P < 0.05 versus control prehypoxic contraction.
Figure 4. Effect ofL-NAME (5 x 105M) on the responses to hypoxia in endothelium-intact veins. Although prehypoxic contraction to 2 x 107M norepinephrine (open bars) was enhanced in the presence ofL-NAME, the magnitude of hypoxic augmentation of contraction to norepinephrine between control andL-NAME were similar (n = 5 rabbits, 24 rings), *P < 0.05 versus prehypoxic contraction. *P < 0.05 versus control prehypoxic contraction.
Figure 4. Effect ofL-NAME (5 x 105M) on the responses to hypoxia in endothelium-intact veins. Although prehypoxic contraction to 2 x 107M norepinephrine (open bars) was enhanced in the presence ofL-NAME, the magnitude of hypoxic augmentation of contraction to norepinephrine between control andL-NAME were similar (n = 5 rabbits, 24 rings), *P < 0.05 versus prehypoxic contraction. *P < 0.05 versus control prehypoxic contraction.
×
Figure 5. Inhibitory effects of phosphoramidon (10 sup -3 M, n = 8 rabbits) and BQ-123 (10 sup -6 M, n = 3 rabbits). Data are expressed as percent change from prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine. Open bars represent control hypoxic response; hatched bars represent hypoxic responses in the presence of drugs;*P < 0.05 versus control.
Figure 5. Inhibitory effects of phosphoramidon (10 sup -3 M, n = 8 rabbits) and BQ-123 (10 sup -6 M, n = 3 rabbits). Data are expressed as percent change from prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine. Open bars represent control hypoxic response; hatched bars represent hypoxic responses in the presence of drugs;*P < 0.05 versus control.
Figure 5. Inhibitory effects of phosphoramidon (10 sup -3 M, n = 8 rabbits) and BQ-123 (10 sup -6 M, n = 3 rabbits). Data are expressed as percent change from prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine. Open bars represent control hypoxic response; hatched bars represent hypoxic responses in the presence of drugs;*P < 0.05 versus control.
×
Effects of Volatile Anesthetics on Hypoxic Response
In endothelium-intact veins, 1.0 MAC halothane (n = 6 rabbits, 21 vessels), isoflurane (n = 6 rabbits, 19 vessels), or enflurane (n = 5, 14 vessels) had no effect on basal contraction to norepinephrine. However, the anesthetics inhibited all phases of the hypoxic response (Figure 6and Figure 7). These effects were reversible after discontinuing anesthetic delivery. Increasing calcium concentration in the baths from 1.6 to 3.2 mM partially reversed the inhibitory effect of anesthetics (data not shown). Halothane and isoflurane also inhibited hypoxic contractions in endothelium-intact veins treated withL-NAME (n = 6 rabbits, 26 vessels;Figure 8). Under normoxic conditions, anesthetics produced relaxation of the endothelium-intact veins precontracted with 2–5 x 109M endothelin-1 (n = 5 rabbits): 39 plus/minus 3% relaxation in halothane group (12 rings), 28 plus/minus 3% in isoflurane group (15 rings), and 20 plus/minus 3% in enflurane group (14 rings).
Figure 6. Representative recordings illustrating inhibitory effects of volatile anesthetics on the hypoxic response in vein rings with endothelium.
Figure 6. Representative recordings illustrating inhibitory effects of volatile anesthetics on the hypoxic response in vein rings with endothelium.
Figure 6. Representative recordings illustrating inhibitory effects of volatile anesthetics on the hypoxic response in vein rings with endothelium.
×
Figure 7. Summary of the inhibitory effects of volatile anesthetics on the hypoxic response. Open bars represent control response expressed as percent change from prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine; solid bars represent responses in the presence of 1 MAC equivalent of halothane (n - 6 rabbits), isoflurane (n - 6 rabbits), and enflurane (n - 5 rabbits);* P < 0.05 versus corresponding control.
Figure 7. Summary of the inhibitory effects of volatile anesthetics on the hypoxic response. Open bars represent control response expressed as percent change from prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine; solid bars represent responses in the presence of 1 MAC equivalent of halothane (n - 6 rabbits), isoflurane (n - 6 rabbits), and enflurane (n - 5 rabbits);* P < 0.05 versus corresponding control.
Figure 7. Summary of the inhibitory effects of volatile anesthetics on the hypoxic response. Open bars represent control response expressed as percent change from prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine; solid bars represent responses in the presence of 1 MAC equivalent of halothane (n - 6 rabbits), isoflurane (n - 6 rabbits), and enflurane (n - 5 rabbits);* P < 0.05 versus corresponding control.
×
Figure 8. Effects of halothane (HAL), isoflurane (ISO), and L-NAME (5 x 103M) on the hypoxic response in endothelium-intact veins. Open bars show prehypoxic contraction to 2 x 107M norepinephrine; hatched bars show maximum hypoxic contraction. The responses to hypoxia were attenuated by halothane (a) and isoflurane (b) in the absence as well as presence of L-NAME. Data are mean SEM; n 6 rabbits; P < 0.05 versus control prehypoxic contraction (*), versus hypoxic response in the presence of L-NAME only (**), versus control hypoxic response (section), versus prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine (closed circle).
Figure 8. Effects of halothane (HAL), isoflurane (ISO), and L-NAME (5 x 103M) on the hypoxic response in endothelium-intact veins. Open bars show prehypoxic contraction to 2 x 107M norepinephrine; hatched bars show maximum hypoxic contraction. The responses to hypoxia were attenuated by halothane (a) and isoflurane (b) in the absence as well as presence of L-NAME. Data are mean SEM; n 6 rabbits; P < 0.05 versus control prehypoxic contraction (*), versus hypoxic response in the presence of L-NAME only (**), versus control hypoxic response (section), versus prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine (closed circle).
Figure 8. Effects of halothane (HAL), isoflurane (ISO), and L-NAME (5 x 103M) on the hypoxic response in endothelium-intact veins. Open bars show prehypoxic contraction to 2 x 107M norepinephrine; hatched bars show maximum hypoxic contraction. The responses to hypoxia were attenuated by halothane (a) and isoflurane (b) in the absence as well as presence of L-NAME. Data are mean SEM; n 6 rabbits; P < 0.05 versus control prehypoxic contraction (*), versus hypoxic response in the presence of L-NAME only (**), versus control hypoxic response (section), versus prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine (closed circle).
×
Discussion
Vascular responses to hypoxia differ between species and depend on type of vessels (arteries or veins), tissue origin of vessels under study, and the function of a specific circulatory bed. Hypoxia augments contractile responses to norepinephrine in isolated canine pulmonary and splenic veins via an endothelium-dependent mechanism. [10 ] After removal of the endothelium, hypoxic contraction is reduced in splenic veins and reversed to relaxation in pulmonary veins. [10 ] Endothelium-dependent hypoxic contraction of isolated porcine and canine coronary veins is mediated by cyclooxygenase metabolites of arachidonic acid. [11 ] Contractile responses to norepinephrine in isolated canine saphenous and femoral veins with or without endothelium are unaffected by hypoxianous and femoral veins with or without endothelium are unaffected hypoxia. [10,12 ] However, acute hypoxia causes relaxation of norepinephrine precontracted rings of rabbit saphenous veins (unpublished observations from our laboratory). In isolated canine saphenous veins, acute hypoxia increases endogenous norepinephrine release but decreases norepinephrine metabolism, depletes norepinephrine tissue content, and depresses smooth muscle responses to nerve stimulation. [5 ].
Our study demonstrates that mesenteric capacitance veins of rabbits respond to short-term episodes of acute hypoxia with an increase in contraction to alpha-adrenergic agonists norepinephrine and phenylephrine. Hypoxic contraction is inhibited by phentolamine but is unaltered in the presence of beta-adrenergic antagonist propranolol. The response is transient when precontraction is achieved with prostaglandin PGF2alpha and absent during precontraction with potassium. The hypoxic contraction is endothelium-dependent. It does not occur in the absence of extracellular calcium and is markedly depressed by nicardipine, a blocker of voltage-gated calcium channels in the cell membrane. It is, however, unaffected by ryanodine, a depleter of calcium stores in the sarcoplasmic reticulum. These characteristics indicate a strong dependence on extracellular calcium availability and the importance of transmembrane calcium ion influx into the endothelial and/or smooth muscle cells of veins. Lack of indomethacin and NDGA effects rule out a contribution of cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase products of arachidonic acid metabolism.
It had been proposed that endothelium-dependent responses to hypoxia might be due to the modulation of vascular endothelium relaxing factor (EDRF)/nitric oxide production. [13 ] Hypoxia may inhibit basal release of EDRF and thus induce or augment vasoconstriction in rabbit pulmonary artery [14 ] and human mammary artery. [15 ] In spontaneously hypertensive rats, hypoxia causes contractions of aorta and coronary artery via progressive inhibition of EDRF synthesis. [16 ] However, hypoxia also may stimulate EDRF release, producing vasodilation of rabbit thoracic aorta and femoral arteries. [17,18 ] In our study,L-NAME enhanced the sensitivity of mesenteric veins to norepinephrine but had no effect on hypoxic increase in contraction to norepinephrine. This suggests a hypoxic mechanism not involving EDRF.
Endothelium-dependent hypoxic facilitation of contraction to vasoactive agents alternatively can be attributed to the action of endothelium-derived contracting factors (EDCFs), primarily endothelin-1 (ET 1), a potent vasoconstrictor peptide. In vascular endothelial cells, a precursor (big ET-1) is converted to ET-1 by endothelin converting enzyme, which is selectively blocked by phosphoramidon. [19,20 ] In vascular smooth muscle, ET-1 initiates contraction by binding to specific ETAreceptors. [21,22 ] Cultured endothelial cells isolated from bovine coronary artery [23 ] and human umbilical veins, [24 ] as well as the endothelium of perfused rat mesenteric arteries, [25 ] synthesize ET-1 in response to hypoxia. Rabbit mesenteric veins demonstrate high sensitivity to ET-1. [26–28 ] In our study, the hypoxic augmentation of contraction to norepinephrine occurs exclusively in the presence of intact endothelium, is inhibited by phosphoramidon, and is suppressed by BQ-123, all of which suggest that endogenous endothelin may contribute to the hypoxic contraction of rabbit mesenteric veins. Considering a former model of endothelial cell-dependent vasoconstriction [29,30 ] and a recent hypothesis of two-way communication between the vascular endothelium and vascular smooth muscle, [31 ] we suggest the following mechanism of endothelium-dependent hypoxic contraction of rabbit mesenteric veins. Under hypoxic conditions, a specific adrenoceptor agonist acting directly on the venous smooth muscle cell receptors may evoke a response that could be transferred to the endothelium and activate endothelin-1, which, in turn, may alter/increase the contraction of the smooth muscle. Endothelin-1 may also specifically attenuate the effects of EDRF in the venous smooth muscle. [32 ] Although the production of both endothelin-1 and EDRF depends on extracellular calcium availability, the initial steps of EDRF/nitric oxide synthesis also strongly depend on molecular oxygen availability. [33 ] Thus, under hypoxic conditions, a decrease in oxygen tension may impair EDRF/nitric oxide synthesis. Reduced production of EDRF/nitric oxide and accelerated synthesis of endothelin-1 may enhance the adrenergic responsiveness of the smooth muscle.
Endothelium-dependent hypoxic augmentation of contraction to alpha-adrenergic agonists is not limited to rabbits (Lagomorpha). We have found (unpublished observations from our laboratory) the same type of response to hypoxia in isolated mesenteric veins of guinea pig (Rodentia). However, additional studies involving other species are necessary to draw a general conclusion about possible clinical relevance of these observations.
Volatile anesthetics influence the vascular system via a variety of mechanisms involving the alteration of autonomic function, [34,35 ] modulation of endothelium-dependent and EDRF-mediated processes, [36–38 ] or direct, endothelium-independent actions on vascular smooth muscle. [39–41 ] Although volatile anesthetics are known to attenuate the autonomic responses to hypoxia in vivo, [2,3,6,7 ] their direct vascular effects in the presence of hypoxia are not clarified. It has been demonstrated recently that hypoxia and halothane have direct but opposite effects on metabolism and disposition of endogenous norepinephrine in isolated canine saphenous veins. Separately, hypoxia increased whereas halothane decreased endogenous norepinephrine release. However, when present together, hypoxia and halothane inhibited endogenous norepinephrine metabolism and release, resulting in an overall suppressant effect. [5 ] Our study demonstrates a similar depressant effect of halothane, isoflurane, and enflurane on endothelium-dependent hypoxic contractions of rabbit mesenteric veins. This effect is partially reversed by increasing extracellular calcium. Furthermore, the hypoxic contraction is inhibited by halothane and isoflurane in the absence as well as presence of L-NAME, which suggests a mechanism largely independent of EDRF. The mechanism of volatile anesthetic actions on hypoxic contractions of mesenteric veins may include modulation of transmembrane ion channel activity, [42–44 ] inhibition of calcium influx into the endothelial and/or smooth muscle cells, inhibition of endothelin synthesis, [45 ] and attenuation of endothelin effects in the smooth muscle cells.
To better understand the mechanism of mesenteric venoconstriction during hypoxia and explain the inhibitory actions of volatile anesthetics, further studies are necessary to examine the effects of hypoxia and volatile anesthetics on ion currents and ion channel activity, particularly calcium and potassium, in the venous endothelial and smooth muscle cells.
REFERENCES
Heistad DD, Abboud FM: Circulatory adjustments to hypoxia. Circulation 61:463-470, 1980.
Nisbet IIIA, Gray IG, Olley PM, Johnston AE: Cardiovascular and respiratory responses to severe hypoxaemia during anesthesia. Can Anaesth Soc J 19:339-350, 1972.
Durieux ME, Sperry RJ, Longnecker DE: Effects of hypoxemia on regional blood flows during anesthesia with halothane, enflurane or isoflurane. ANESTHESIOLOGY 76:402-408, 1992.
Hoka S, Bosnjak ZJ, Arimura H, Kampine JP: Regional venous outflow, blood volume and sympathetic nerve activity during severe hypoxia. Am J Physiol 256:11162-11170, 1989.
Kamath GS, Rorie DK, Tyce GM: Altered release and metabolism of norepinephrine in superfused canine saphenous veins in the presence of halothane and hypoxia. ANESTHESIOLOGY 78:553-561, 1993.
Arimura H, Bosnjak ZJ, Hoka S, Kampine JP: Modification by halothane of responses to acute hypoxia in systemic vascular capacitance, resistance and sympathetic nerve activity in dogs. Anesth Analg 73:319-326, 1991.
Stekiel TA, Tominaga M, Bosnjak ZJ, Kampine JP: The inhibitory effect of halothane on mesenteric venoconstriction and related reflex responses during acute graded hypoxia in rabbits. ANESTHESIOLOGY 77:709-720, 1992.
Lopez JAG, Brown BP, Armstrong ML, Piegors DJ, Heistad DD: Response of the mesenteric circulation to serotonin in normal and atherosclerotic monkeys: Implications for the pathogenesis of non-occlusive intestinal ischaemia. Cardiovasc Res 23:117-124, 1989.
Abrol RP, Hughes VW, Krueger CA, Cook DA: Detection of endothelium in the cerebral blood vessels. J Pharmacol Methods 12:213-219, 1984.
DeMey JG, Vanhoutte PM: Heterogenous behavior of the canine arterial and venous wall: Importance of the endothelium. Circ Res 51:439-447, 1982.
Vedernikov YP, Graser T, Li DS: Hypoxic and posthypoxic responses in isolated coronary arteries and veins: Role of endothelium Biomed Biochim Acta 19:1177-1184, 1990.
Rubanyi GM, Vanhoutte PM: Hypoxia releases a vasoconstrictor substance from the canine vascular endothelium. J Physiol (Lond) 364:45-56, 1985.
Martin W: Basal release of endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Relaxing and Contracting Factors: Biological and Clinical Research. Edited by Vanhoutte PM, Clifton, Humana, 1988, pp 159-178.
Johns RA, Linden JM, Peach MJ: Endothelium-dependent relaxation and cyclic GMP accumulation in rabbit pulmonary artery are selectively impaired by moderate hypoxia. Circ Res 65:1508-1515, 1989.
Pearson PJ, Lin PJ, Evora PRB, Schaff HV: Endothelium-dependent response of human internal mammary artery to hypoxia Am J Physiol 264:H376-H380, 1993.
Muramatsu M, Iwama Y, Shimizu K, Asano H, Toki Y, Miyazaki Y, Okumura K, Hashimoto H, Ito T: Hypoxia-elicited contraction of aorta and coronary artery via removal of endothelium-derived nitric oxide. Am J Physiol 263:H1339-H1347, 1992.
Archer SL, Tolins JP, Raij L, Weir EK: Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction is enhanced by inhibition of the synthesis of an endothelium derived relaxing factor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 164:1198-1205, 1989.
Pohl U, Busse R: Hypoxia stimulates release of endothelium-derived relaxant factor. Am J Physiol 256:H1595-H1600, 1989.
Okada K, Miyazaki Y, Takada J, Matsuyama K, Yamaki T, Yano M: Conversion of big endothelin-1 by membrane-bound metalloen-dopeptidase in cultured bovine endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 171:1192-1198, 1990.
Fukuroda T, Noguchi K, Tsuchida S, Nishikibe M, Ikemoto F, Okada K, Yano M: Inhibition of biological actions of big endothelin-1 by phosphoramidon. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 172:390-395, 1990.
Webb ML, Dickinson KE, Delaney CL, Liu EC-K, Serafino R, Cohen RB, Monshizadegan H, Moreland S: The endothelin receptor antagonist, BQ-123, inhibits angiotensin H-induced contractions in rabbit aorta. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 185:887-892, 1992.
Thara M, Noguchi K, Sacki T, Fukuroda T, Tsuchida S, Kimura S, S. Fukami T, Ishikawa K, Nishikibe M, Yano M: Biological profiles of highly potent novel endothelin antagonists selective for the ET sub A receptor. Life Sci 50:247-255, 1991.
Heida HS, Gomez-Sanchez CE: Hypoxia increases endothelin release in bovine endothelial cells in culture, but epinephrine, norepinephrine, serotonin, histamine and angiotensin II do not Life Sci 47:247-251, 1990.
Kourembanas S, Marsden PA, McQuillan LP, Faller DV: Hypoxia induces endothelin gene expression and secretion in cultured human endothelium. J Clin Invest 88:1054-1057, 1991.
Rakugi H, Tabuchi Y, Nakamaru M, Nagano M, Higashimori K, Mikami H, Ogihara T, Suzuki N: Evidence for endothelin-1 release from resistance vessels of rat in response to hypoxia. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 169:973-977, 1990.
D'Orleans-Juste P, DeNucci G, Vane JR: Endothelin-1 contracts isolated vessels independently of dihydropyridine-sensitive Ca sup 2+ channel activation. Eur J Pharmacol 165:289-295, 1989.
D'Orleans-Juste P, Finet M, DeNucci G, Vane JR: Pharmacology of endothelin-1 in isolated vessels: Effect of nicardipine, methylene blue, hemoglobin, and gossypol. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 13(suppl 5):S19-S22, 1989.
Cocks TM, Angus JA, Broughton A: Endothelin-1 is a selective vasoconstrictor: Studies on human, dog and rabbit blood vessels in vitro and in vivo. Endothelium-derived Contracting Factors. Edited by Rubanyi GM, Vanhoutte PM, Basel, Karger, 1990. pp 73-79.
Vanhoutte PM: Endothelium-dependent contractions in arteries and veins. Blood Vessels 24:141-144, 1987.
Highsmith RF, Pang DC, Rapoport RM: Endothelial cell-derived vasoconstrictors: Mechanisms of action in vascular smooth muscle J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 13(suppl 5):S36-S44, 1989.
Marchenko SM, Sage SO: Smooth muscle cells affect endothelial membrane potential in rat aorta. Am J Physiol 267:11804-811, 1994.
Luscher TF, Yang Z, Tschudi M, von Segesser L, Stulz P. Boulanger Ch, Siebenmann R, Turina M, Bubler FR: Interaction between endothelin-1 and endothelium-derived relaxing factor in human arteries and veins. Circ Res 66:1088-1094, 1990.
Johns RA: Endothelium, anesthetics and vascular control. ANESTHESIOLOGY 79:1381-1391, 1993.
Muldoon SM: Anesthetic effects on vascular smooth muscle, Adv Exp Med Biol 301:207-213, 1991.
Bosnjak ZJ: Ion channels in vascular smooth muscle: physiology and pharmacology. ANESTHESIOLOGY 79:1392-1401, 1993.
Blaise G, Sill JC, Nugent M, VanDyke RA, Vanhoutte PM: Isoflurane causes endothelium-dependent inhibition of contractile responses of canine coronary arteries. ANESTHESIOLOGY 67:513-517, 1987.
Muldoon SM, Hart JL, Bowen KA, Freas W: Attenuation of endothelium mediated vasodilation by halothane. ANESTHESIOLOGY 68:31-37, 1988.
Uggeri MJ. Proctor GJ, John RA: Halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane attenuate both receptor- and non receptor-mediated EDRF production in rat thoracic aorta. ANESTHESIOLOGY 76:1012-1017, 1992.
Stone DJ, Johns RA: Endothelium-dependent effects of halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane on isolated rat aortic vascular rings. ANESTHESIOLOGY 71:126-132, 1989.
Brendel JK, Johns RA: Isoflurane does not vasodilate rat thoracic aortic rings by endothelium-derived relaxing factor or other cyclic GMP-mediated mechanisms. ANESTHESIOLOGY 77:126-131, 1992.
Hart JL, Jing M, Bina S, Freas W, VanDyke RA, Muldoon SM: Effects of halothane on EDRF/eGMP-mediated vascular smooth muscle relaxation. ANESTHESIOLOGY 79:323-331, 1993.
Buljubasic N, Rusch NJ, Marijic J, Kampine JP, Bosnjak ZJ: Effects of halothane and isoflurane on calcium channel currents in canine coronary arterial cells. ANESTHESIOLOGY 76:990-998, 1992.
Buljubasic N, Flynn NM, Marijic J, Rusch NJ, Kampine JP, Bosnjak ZJ: Effects of isoflurane on K sup + and Ca sup 2+ conductance in isolated smooth muscle cells of canine cerebral arteries. Anesth Analg 75:590-596, 1992.
Yamazaki M, Ito Y, Hatakeyama N, Masuda A: Effects of halothane on voltage-dependent calcium currents in single smooth muscle cells from rabbit portal vein (abstract): Anesth Analg 76:S473, 1993.
Armstead VE, Westcott JY, Stenmark KR: Halothane and isoflurane inhibit endothelin production in neonatal bovine pulmonary artery endothelial cells (abstract). ANESTHESIOLOGY 77:A693, 1992.
Figure 1. Representative tracings showing the responses to hypoxia in mesenteric veins with and without endothelium:(a) 3 x 107M norepinephrine time control, (b) hypoxic contraction in a vein ring with endothelium, and no response in matching ring without endothelium, and (c) responses to 104M acetylcholine (ACh) in 106M norepinephrine contracted veins.
Figure 1. Representative tracings showing the responses to hypoxia in mesenteric veins with and without endothelium:(a) 3 x 107M norepinephrine time control, (b) hypoxic contraction in a vein ring with endothelium, and no response in matching ring without endothelium, and (c) responses to 104M acetylcholine (ACh) in 106M norepinephrine contracted veins.
Figure 1. Representative tracings showing the responses to hypoxia in mesenteric veins with and without endothelium:(a) 3 x 107M norepinephrine time control, (b) hypoxic contraction in a vein ring with endothelium, and no response in matching ring without endothelium, and (c) responses to 104M acetylcholine (ACh) in 106M norepinephrine contracted veins.
×
Figure 2. The profile of the hypoxic response in mesenteric veins with and without endothelium contracted with 3/10 [7 ] M norepinephrine: prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine (3 min-0 min), transient relaxation at the onset of hypoxia (1–2 min), maximum increase in contraction during hypoxia (5–10 min), and posthypoxic relaxation after reoxygenation (10–13 min). Norepinephrine time controls show higher sensitivity to norepinephrine in veins without endothelium (E) and time-dependent decay of contraction to norepinephrine in veins with endothelium (+E). Hypoxia augmented contraction to norepinephrine only in veins with endothelium (+E). Data are mean + SEM; n 9 rabbits, 16 rings in each group.
Figure 2. The profile of the hypoxic response in mesenteric veins with and without endothelium contracted with 3/10 [7] M norepinephrine: prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine (3 min-0 min), transient relaxation at the onset of hypoxia (1–2 min), maximum increase in contraction during hypoxia (5–10 min), and posthypoxic relaxation after reoxygenation (10–13 min). Norepinephrine time controls show higher sensitivity to norepinephrine in veins without endothelium (E) and time-dependent decay of contraction to norepinephrine in veins with endothelium (+E). Hypoxia augmented contraction to norepinephrine only in veins with endothelium (+E). Data are mean + SEM; n 9 rabbits, 16 rings in each group.
Figure 2. The profile of the hypoxic response in mesenteric veins with and without endothelium contracted with 3/10 [7 ] M norepinephrine: prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine (3 min-0 min), transient relaxation at the onset of hypoxia (1–2 min), maximum increase in contraction during hypoxia (5–10 min), and posthypoxic relaxation after reoxygenation (10–13 min). Norepinephrine time controls show higher sensitivity to norepinephrine in veins without endothelium (E) and time-dependent decay of contraction to norepinephrine in veins with endothelium (+E). Hypoxia augmented contraction to norepinephrine only in veins with endothelium (+E). Data are mean + SEM; n 9 rabbits, 16 rings in each group.
×
Figure 3. Effects of indomethacin (10 sup -5 M), NDGA (2 x 105x M), ryanodine (5 x 10 sup -6 M), and nicardipine (105M) on the hypoxic response in endothelium-intact veins. Responses to hypoxia are expressed as percent change from prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine. Open bars represent control hypoxic response; hatched bars represent hypoxic response in the presence of drugs; n = 5 rabbits in each group;*P < 0.01 nicardipine versus control.
Figure 3. Effects of indomethacin (10 sup -5 M), NDGA (2 x 105x M), ryanodine (5 x 10 sup -6 M), and nicardipine (105M) on the hypoxic response in endothelium-intact veins. Responses to hypoxia are expressed as percent change from prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine. Open bars represent control hypoxic response; hatched bars represent hypoxic response in the presence of drugs; n = 5 rabbits in each group;*P < 0.01 nicardipine versus control.
Figure 3. Effects of indomethacin (10 sup -5 M), NDGA (2 x 105x M), ryanodine (5 x 10 sup -6 M), and nicardipine (105M) on the hypoxic response in endothelium-intact veins. Responses to hypoxia are expressed as percent change from prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine. Open bars represent control hypoxic response; hatched bars represent hypoxic response in the presence of drugs; n = 5 rabbits in each group;*P < 0.01 nicardipine versus control.
×
Figure 4. Effect ofL-NAME (5 x 105M) on the responses to hypoxia in endothelium-intact veins. Although prehypoxic contraction to 2 x 107M norepinephrine (open bars) was enhanced in the presence ofL-NAME, the magnitude of hypoxic augmentation of contraction to norepinephrine between control andL-NAME were similar (n = 5 rabbits, 24 rings), *P < 0.05 versus prehypoxic contraction. *P < 0.05 versus control prehypoxic contraction.
Figure 4. Effect ofL-NAME (5 x 105M) on the responses to hypoxia in endothelium-intact veins. Although prehypoxic contraction to 2 x 107M norepinephrine (open bars) was enhanced in the presence ofL-NAME, the magnitude of hypoxic augmentation of contraction to norepinephrine between control andL-NAME were similar (n = 5 rabbits, 24 rings), *P < 0.05 versus prehypoxic contraction. *P < 0.05 versus control prehypoxic contraction.
Figure 4. Effect ofL-NAME (5 x 105M) on the responses to hypoxia in endothelium-intact veins. Although prehypoxic contraction to 2 x 107M norepinephrine (open bars) was enhanced in the presence ofL-NAME, the magnitude of hypoxic augmentation of contraction to norepinephrine between control andL-NAME were similar (n = 5 rabbits, 24 rings), *P < 0.05 versus prehypoxic contraction. *P < 0.05 versus control prehypoxic contraction.
×
Figure 5. Inhibitory effects of phosphoramidon (10 sup -3 M, n = 8 rabbits) and BQ-123 (10 sup -6 M, n = 3 rabbits). Data are expressed as percent change from prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine. Open bars represent control hypoxic response; hatched bars represent hypoxic responses in the presence of drugs;*P < 0.05 versus control.
Figure 5. Inhibitory effects of phosphoramidon (10 sup -3 M, n = 8 rabbits) and BQ-123 (10 sup -6 M, n = 3 rabbits). Data are expressed as percent change from prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine. Open bars represent control hypoxic response; hatched bars represent hypoxic responses in the presence of drugs;*P < 0.05 versus control.
Figure 5. Inhibitory effects of phosphoramidon (10 sup -3 M, n = 8 rabbits) and BQ-123 (10 sup -6 M, n = 3 rabbits). Data are expressed as percent change from prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine. Open bars represent control hypoxic response; hatched bars represent hypoxic responses in the presence of drugs;*P < 0.05 versus control.
×
Figure 6. Representative recordings illustrating inhibitory effects of volatile anesthetics on the hypoxic response in vein rings with endothelium.
Figure 6. Representative recordings illustrating inhibitory effects of volatile anesthetics on the hypoxic response in vein rings with endothelium.
Figure 6. Representative recordings illustrating inhibitory effects of volatile anesthetics on the hypoxic response in vein rings with endothelium.
×
Figure 7. Summary of the inhibitory effects of volatile anesthetics on the hypoxic response. Open bars represent control response expressed as percent change from prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine; solid bars represent responses in the presence of 1 MAC equivalent of halothane (n - 6 rabbits), isoflurane (n - 6 rabbits), and enflurane (n - 5 rabbits);* P < 0.05 versus corresponding control.
Figure 7. Summary of the inhibitory effects of volatile anesthetics on the hypoxic response. Open bars represent control response expressed as percent change from prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine; solid bars represent responses in the presence of 1 MAC equivalent of halothane (n - 6 rabbits), isoflurane (n - 6 rabbits), and enflurane (n - 5 rabbits);* P < 0.05 versus corresponding control.
Figure 7. Summary of the inhibitory effects of volatile anesthetics on the hypoxic response. Open bars represent control response expressed as percent change from prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine; solid bars represent responses in the presence of 1 MAC equivalent of halothane (n - 6 rabbits), isoflurane (n - 6 rabbits), and enflurane (n - 5 rabbits);* P < 0.05 versus corresponding control.
×
Figure 8. Effects of halothane (HAL), isoflurane (ISO), and L-NAME (5 x 103M) on the hypoxic response in endothelium-intact veins. Open bars show prehypoxic contraction to 2 x 107M norepinephrine; hatched bars show maximum hypoxic contraction. The responses to hypoxia were attenuated by halothane (a) and isoflurane (b) in the absence as well as presence of L-NAME. Data are mean SEM; n 6 rabbits; P < 0.05 versus control prehypoxic contraction (*), versus hypoxic response in the presence of L-NAME only (**), versus control hypoxic response (section), versus prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine (closed circle).
Figure 8. Effects of halothane (HAL), isoflurane (ISO), and L-NAME (5 x 103M) on the hypoxic response in endothelium-intact veins. Open bars show prehypoxic contraction to 2 x 107M norepinephrine; hatched bars show maximum hypoxic contraction. The responses to hypoxia were attenuated by halothane (a) and isoflurane (b) in the absence as well as presence of L-NAME. Data are mean SEM; n 6 rabbits; P < 0.05 versus control prehypoxic contraction (*), versus hypoxic response in the presence of L-NAME only (**), versus control hypoxic response (section), versus prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine (closed circle).
Figure 8. Effects of halothane (HAL), isoflurane (ISO), and L-NAME (5 x 103M) on the hypoxic response in endothelium-intact veins. Open bars show prehypoxic contraction to 2 x 107M norepinephrine; hatched bars show maximum hypoxic contraction. The responses to hypoxia were attenuated by halothane (a) and isoflurane (b) in the absence as well as presence of L-NAME. Data are mean SEM; n 6 rabbits; P < 0.05 versus control prehypoxic contraction (*), versus hypoxic response in the presence of L-NAME only (**), versus control hypoxic response (section), versus prehypoxic contraction to norepinephrine (closed circle).
×
Table 1. Concentrations of Volatile Anesthetics in the Baths
Image not available
Table 1. Concentrations of Volatile Anesthetics in the Baths
×