Free
Clinical Science  |   June 1995
Clinical Effects and Maternal and Fetal Plasma Concentrations of Epidural Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine for Cesarean Section
Author Notes
  • (Datta) Professor of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School; Director of Obstetric Anesthesia. Brigham and Women's Hospital.
  • (Camann, Bader) Assistant Professor of Anaesthesia, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School.
  • (VanderBurgh) Research Nurse, Department of Anesthesia, Brigham and Women's Hospital.
  • Received from the Department of Anesthesia. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School. Boston, Massachusetts. Submitted for publication September 6, 1994. Accepted for publication February 26, 1995. Supported in part by a grant form Astra Pain Control, Sweden. Presented in part at the annual meeting of the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology, Philadelphia, May 1994, and the annual meeting of American Society of Anesthesiologists, San Francisco, October 1994.
  • Address reprint requests to Dr Datta: Department of Anesthesia, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
Article Information
Clinical Science
Clinical Science   |   June 1995
Clinical Effects and Maternal and Fetal Plasma Concentrations of Epidural Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine for Cesarean Section
Anesthesiology 6 1995, Vol.82, 1346-1352.. doi:
Anesthesiology 6 1995, Vol.82, 1346-1352.. doi:
Key words: Anesthesia: epidural; obstetric. Local anesthetics: bupivacaine; ropivacaine.
ROPIVACAINE (1-propyl-2',6'-pipecoloxylidide hydrochloride monohydrate) is a new, long-acting amide local anesthetic with a structure closely related to bupivacaine and mepivacaine. Whereas both bupivacaine and mepivacaine are available as a racemic mixture, ropivacaine is available only as the pure 5-enantiomer. [1] .
Reports of animal studies show that ropivacaine has less central nervous and cardiovascular system toxicity than does bupivacaine. [2-5] In human volunteers, ropivacaine has been shown to be less toxic than bupivacaine with regard to central nervous system and cardiovascular changes after intravenous infusion. [6] Clinically, during the use of epidural anesthesia in nonpregnant human subjects, ropivacaine and bupivacaine in equipotent doses are associated with similar onset time, duration of sensory blockade, and overall clinical efficacy. [1,7] However, the intensity of motor block appears to be reduced with ropivacaine compared to bupivacaine. [1,7] In pregnant sheep, ropivacaine is not associated with any adverse effects on uterine artery blood flow or fetal well-being. [8] .
Although ropivacaine has been investigated in non-pregnant humans for a variety of surgical and anesthetic procedures, this agent has not been described in the pregnant patient. We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial comparing a fixed dose (150 mg) of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine for elective cesarean section. The purpose of this trial was to assess the clinical effects and pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine, in humans, when used in obstetric anesthesia.
Methods
The protocol was approved by our hospital institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Inclusion criteria were uncomplicated singleton pregnancy between 37 and 42 weeks; age 16-40 yr; weight less than 110 kg; scheduled, elective cesarean section; no concomitant maternal or fetal medical complications; and planned epidural anesthesia. Before induction of epidural anesthesia, each patient received 10 mg metoclopramide intravenously and 30 ml Nutracid (sodium citrate solution: N.E. Pharmaceuticals, Peabody, MA) orally, and acute volume expansion with 1,500-2,000 ml of Ringer's lactate solution intravenously. The epidural space was identified using a 17-G Weiss needle at the L2-L3 or L3-L4 interspace using loss-of-resistance to air technique, and 2-3 cm of the epidural catheter was threaded through the needle. After placement of the epidural catheters, all patients were placed in the supine position with uterine displacement achieved by a blanket roll under the right hip. Three milliliters of study solution was injected as a test dose, and the patient was observed for signs of subarachnoid or intravenous injection. Thirty milliliters of either 0.5% bupivacaine or 0.5% ropivacaine was injected epidurally in divided doses over 10-min. Randomization was performed using a computer-generated random-number scheme and all drugs were supplied in sequentially numbered, identical-appearing ampules provided by Astra Pharmaceutical (Sodertalje, Sweden). All study personnel were blinded to the drug administered. Assessment of sensory block to pinprick was determined at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min after the injection of the study drug. Thereafter, assessments were made every 30 min up to 5 h and then every hour until the return of normal sensation. The degree of motor blockade was assessed bilaterally at the same times using a modified Bromage scale [9] : 0 = ability to move hips. knees, and ankles; 1 = inability to raise extended leg (just able to flex knee); 2 = inability to flex knee (able to flex foot only); and 3 = inability to flex ankle (unable to flex foot or knee).
Maternal heart rate, systolic, and diastolic blood pressure were followed intermittently during induction of anesthesia, surgery, and the postoperative period by using an automatic blood pressure recorder. Values were recorded at 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min after the injection of epidural solution. Hypotension was defined as the systolic blood pressure of less or equal to 90 mmHg or 30 mmHg below the baseline systolic pressure. Hypotension was corrected with 5-10 mg intravenous ephedrine and infusion of Ringer's lactate. Fetal heart rate was recorded continuously during induction of epidural anesthesia. Quality of anesthesia and abdominal wall muscle relaxation were judged by one of the investigators and surgeons after the end of the surgery as satisfactory or unsatisfactory. Patients were asked to rate their perceived pain on a 100 mm visual analog scale with "0" as no pain and "100" as "worst pain ever." Visual analog scale assessments were observed at the following times: (1) at skin incision, (2) at uterine incision, (3) at uterine exteriorization, and (4) on arrival in recovery room.
Neonatal assessments were done by measuring umbilical vein and umbilical artery blood gas measurements at the time of delivery from a double-clamped segment of umbilical cord. A sample of maternal blood was drawn from the antecubital vein at the time of delivery. Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min were determined by a pediatrician. All infants were examined using both neurologic and adaptive capacity scores [10] and Scanlon's early neonatal neurobehavior scores [11] at 2 and 24 h after birth.
Pharmacokinetic Assessments
Peripheral maternal venous blood samples were collected from 20 subjects via an inducing large bore intravenous catheter with a stopcock connected, located in a large vein in the arm contralateral to that used for intravenous infusions. Blood samples of 5 ml were collected for determination of final drug concentration at the following times: before epidural drug administration (baseline); O (end of local anesthetic injection); 5, 10, 20, 30, and 60 min and 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after completion of the injection; and at the time of delivery. An additional 5 ml of blood was taken for determination of free drug concentration and concentration of alpha 1 acid glycoprotein at baseline, 30 min. and delivery. Maternal venous blood gas measurements were determined at time of delivery. Umbilical artery and vein blood samples were obtained from a double-clamped segment of cord for determination of total and free local anesthetic concentration and alpha 1 acid glycoprotein. Blood samples were centrifuged at room temperature within 60 min of collection, and the plasma was transferred to fresh tubes (5 ml, Cryotube, Nunc, Denmark). All plasma was immediately frozen and maintained at -20 degrees Celsius. The total concentrations of local anesthetics were determined by using gas chromatography. [12] The detection limit of the method was 0.008 mg/l (0.03 micro mol/l), the interassay precision about 5%, and the recovery close to 100%.
The free concentration of ropivacaine and bupivacaine was determined by coupled-column liquid chromatography after ultrafiltration of the plasma samples. Ropivacaine and bupivacaine were detected by ultraviolet at 210 nm, and the limit of determination was set at 0.003-0.008 mg/l (0.01-0.03 micro mol/l). [13] The interassay precision was about 3% for the two drugs, determined from aqueous standards. The recovery was close to 100% for both drugs. The analysis of alpha 1 acid glycoprotein was performed by using a radioimmunodiffusion procedure, using a commercially available kit (NOR-Partigen, Behringwerkie, Marburg, Germany). The limit of determination was set at 2 micro mol/1. The precision was 5%. [1,3] .
The peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of ropivacaine was estimated from the observed concentration-time points using log-linear regression. Epidural clearance was calculated as dose (mg base)/total area trader the plasma concentration-time curve, assuming 100% bio-availability from the epidural space.
Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance, Wilcoxon's rank-sum test, chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test, where appropriate. Wilcoxon's rank-sum test was used to compare the treatments with regard to onset and duration of sensory and motor block. Onset and duration were compared at each segment for sensory block and at each degree of motor block. Results are expressed as mean plus/minus SE. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Sixty-nine subjects were enrolled in the protocol. Nine patients were excluded because of technical failures (5), lost data (1), prolonged delay due to inability to schedule an operating room (1), protocol deviation due to obesity (1), and necessity of administration of chloroprocaine to achieve T4block (1). Thus, 60 subjects remained for evaluation: 31 received ropivacaine, and 29 received bupivacaine. A comparison of the two groups of patients (Table 1) revealed no significant differences in maternal demographic characteristics.
Table 1. Patient Characteristics
Image not available
Table 1. Patient Characteristics
×
Sensory Block
(Figure 1and Figure 2) present the mean onset and offset of sensory block by segment. Mean onset of sensory anesthesia was similar between groups for all segmental levels. It varied between 2.7 min (L1) to 14.1 min (S3) for ropivacaine and 2.8 min (L1) to 13.3 min (S3) for bupivacaine. T4 block occurred in a mean of 14 plus/minus 8 min for ropivacaine and 17 plus/minus 10 min for bupivacaine, which was not statistically different. The maximum upper level of sensory block observed in any patient for ropivacaine was C8 versus T1 for bupivacaine. Mean duration of sensory block at the T4 dermatome was 2.4 plus/minus 0.9 h (ropivacaine) versus 2.4 plus/minus 1.0 h (bupivacaine) and 6.5 plus/minus 1.5 h (ropivacaine) versus 6.3 plus/minus 2.2 (bupivacaine) h at the T 12 dermatome (P = NS).
Figure 1. Levels of onset of sensory epidural anesthesia as a function of time for ropivacaine and bupivacaine.
Figure 1. Levels of onset of sensory epidural anesthesia as a function of time for ropivacaine and bupivacaine.
Figure 1. Levels of onset of sensory epidural anesthesia as a function of time for ropivacaine and bupivacaine.
×
Figure 2. Levels of offset of sensory epidural anesthesia as a function of time for ropivacaine and bupivacaine.
Figure 2. Levels of offset of sensory epidural anesthesia as a function of time for ropivacaine and bupivacaine.
Figure 2. Levels of offset of sensory epidural anesthesia as a function of time for ropivacaine and bupivacaine.
×
Motor Block
Frequency of motor blockade did not differ between groups. In the bupivacaine group, 97%, 77%, and 40% achieved degrees 1, 2, and 3, respectively, compared to 83%, 59%, and 21% for the patients in the ropivacaine group (P = NS). It required a significantly longer mean time for onset of motor blockade degrees 1 and 2 to occur in patients receiving ropivacaine (Table 2). There was also significantly shorter duration of degree 1 motor blockade for patients in the ropivacaine group (Table 2).
Table 2. Motor Blockade
Image not available
Table 2. Motor Blockade
×
Maternal Blood Pressure
The incidence of maternal hypotension was 90% in both groups; 28 patients in ropivacaine needed ephedrine versus 26 patients in bupivacaine group (P = NS; Table 3). A similar dose of ephedrine was used in both groups of patients: 17.4 plus/minus 3.1 mg and 18.2 plus/minus 3.2 mg for the ropivacaine and bupivacaine groups, respectively.
Table 3. Mean (plus/minus SE) Value for Maternal Heart Rate and Blood Pressure
Image not available
Table 3. Mean (plus/minus SE) Value for Maternal Heart Rate and Blood Pressure
×
Quality of Sensory Anesthesia and Muscular Relaxation
Satisfactory anesthesia and muscle relaxation were observed in both groups. None of the patients perceived any pain during skin incision. One patient in the ropivacaine group experienced mild pain (visual analog scale score < 3) during uterine incision. Three patients in each group experienced pain during uterine exteriorization. One patient in the bupivacaine group and one in the ropivacaine group experienced mild to moderate pain (visual analog scale score 3-6) on arrival in the recovery room. None of the patients needed intravenous analgesia or sedation during surgery.
Neonatal Data
No abnormalities in fetal heart rate were noted during induction of epidural anesthesia. Apgar scores were 7 or greater at 5 min in all neonates in both groups, and normal pH values in the cord blood were observed. There were no significant differences between either Scanlon's early neonatal neurobehavior scores or neurologic and adaptive capacity scores between the two groups.
Pharmacokinetic Analysis
Plasma concentration-time profiles of ropivacaine and bupivacaine are shown in Figure 3and Figure 4. A similar Cmaxwas obtained: 1.3 plus/minus 0.09 for ropivacaine and 1.1 plus/minus 0.10 micro gram/ml for bupivacaine (Table 4). The half-life of the terminal decline in plasma concentration was 5.2 plus/minus 0.60 h for ropivacaine and 10.9 plus/minus 1.07 h for bupivacaine (P < 0.01). The clearance, however, was the same for both agents (0.25 plus/minus 0.02 l/min for ropivacaine, and 0.29 plus/minus 0.02 l/min for bupivacaine). The free plasma maternal concentrations of ropivacaine at time of delivery were about twice as high as the free concentrations of bupivacaine (0.099 plus/minus 0.008 micro gram/ml vs. 0.055 plus/minus 0.004 micro gram/ml, P < 0.01). The neonatal free plasma concentrations (from umbilical vein) of ropivacaine was greater than for bupivacaine, 0.072 plus/minus 0.008 micro gram/ml compared to 0.041 plus/minus 0.002 micro gram/ml, respectively (P < 0.01). At the time of delivery, free plasma concentrations of both drugs (from umbilical vein) were greater in the neonate compared to the mother. Umbilical artery concentrations were twice as great in the ropivacaine group compared to bupivacaine group (0.073 micro gram/ml plus/minus 0.005 mg/l vs. 0.038 plus/minus 0.003 micro gram/ml, P < 0.01).
Table 4. Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Image not available
Table 4. Pharmacokinetic Parameters
×
Figure 3. Plasma concentrations of ropivacaine versus time for ten patients.
Figure 3. Plasma concentrations of ropivacaine versus time for ten patients.
Figure 3. Plasma concentrations of ropivacaine versus time for ten patients.
×
Figure 4. Plasma concentrations of bupivacaine versus time for ten individual patients.
Figure 4. Plasma concentrations of bupivacaine versus time for ten individual patients.
Figure 4. Plasma concentrations of bupivacaine versus time for ten individual patients.
×
Discussion
Pharmacologic and laboratory investigations continue to attempt to develop a new long-acting local anesthetic that is efficacious and safe. Bupivacaine has become the most popular agent for obstetric analgesia and anesthesia during labor, because of its favorable sensory-motor differentiation. However, bupivacaine has been associated with severe cardiovascular toxicity when accidentally injected intravascularly, and this toxicity has been observed to be significantly greater during pregnancy. [14-16] Intact animal studies and in vitro nerve preparations demonstrated ropivacaine to possess sensory anesthetic effects similar to those of bupivacaine. [17] However, ropivacaine appears to have a greater margin of safety with regard to cardiovascular and arrhythmogenic toxicity compared to bupivacaine. [2-6] .
The results of the current study demonstrated that ropivacaine and bupivacaine provided similar sensory anesthesia, which was adequate for the surgical procedure. Motor blockade occurred with slower onset and shorter duration in patients who received ropivacaine. These findings may be of clinical significance with regard to postoperative recovery room stay and use of these agents during labor, although these parameters were not assessed in this study. A previous study in volunteers also observed satisfactory sensory anesthesia with minimal blockade of motor function using ropivacaine at a concentration of 0.5%; however, an increase in concentration to 0.75% or 1.0% resulted in a more profound motor blockade. [7] .
The incidence of hypotension was greater in the current study in both groups (90%) than that previously reported using bupivacaine. [18] This was most probably related to faster onset of sympathetic block due to the short time (10 min) over which this 30 ml was injected. The hypotension was corrected promptly and maternal and neonatal pH values were normal. Neonatal Apgar scores and neurobehavioral examination results were within normal limits.
The maternal and neonatal free plasma concentrations of ropivacaine were greater at the time of delivery than were the corresponding values for bupivacaine (maternal 0.09 plus/minus 0.008 mg/l vs. 0.06 plus/minus 0.006 mg/l and neonatal 0.09 plus/minus 0.008 mg/l vs. 0.06 plus/minus 0.006 mg/l, ropivacaine vs. bupivacaine, respectively). This may be explained, in part, by the lesser degree of protein binding capacity of ropivacaine compared to bupivacaine. The lipid solubility of ropivacaine is much less than that of bupivacaine (relative n-heptane/buffer partitioning of bupivacaine versus ropivacaine is 10: 2.9). [19] Thus, the epidural fat may act as a depot for bupivacaine more so than for ropivacaine, facilitating systemic absorption of ropivacaine from this tissue compartment. This might explain the shorter half-life of the terminal decline in plasma concentration in the case of ropivacaine. The other mechanism that may be involved is rapid hepatic clearance. [20] The shorter half-life of ropivacaine compared to bupivacaine also has been observed by others. [21,22] .
The clinical implications of this difference in plasma concentrations is probably of little significance, because both ropivacaine and bupivacaine concentrations (including Cmax) in our study were less than the reported concentrations causing convulsions in an animal study (11.4 and 18.0 mg/l, respectively) [2] and were apparently well tolerated by the mothers and fetuses. Unlike that for bupivacaine, ropivacaine's cardiotoxicity has been shown, in some animal models, not to be enhanced by pregnancy. [15,16] A study in sheep appeared to challenge this conclusion, when toxic manifestations occurred at similar blood concentrations for ropivacaine and bupivacaine after intravenous infusions, and pregnancy did not appear to enhance the toxicity of either drug. [23] However, these authors found that greater doses of ropivacaine were needed to produce signs of central nervous system or cardiovascular toxicity compared to bupivacaine.
In conclusion, 0.5% epidural ropivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine each produced adequate and equivalent sensory anesthesia for cesarean section, with ropivacaine resulting in slower onset and shorter duration of degree 1 motor blockade.
The authors thank Eva Bredberg, Ph.D., Astra Pain Control AB, Sodertalje, Sweden, for performance of the pharmacokinetic evaluation, and Torbjorn Arvidsson. Ph.D., Astra Pain Control, for the bioanalytical work.
REFERENCES
Concepcion M, Arthur GR, Steele SM, Bader AM, Covino BG: A new local anesthetic, ropivacaine: Its epidural effects in humans. Anesth Analg 70:80-85, 1990.
Feldman HS, Arthur GR, Covino BG: Comparative systemic toxicity of convulsant and supraconvulsant doses of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and lidocaine in the conscious dog. Anesth Analg 69:794801, 1989.
Feldman HS. Arthur GR, Pitkanen M, Hurley R, Doucette AM, Covino BG: Treatment of acute systemic toxicity after the rapid intravenous injection of ropivacaine and bupivacaine in the conscious dog. Anesth Analg 73:373-384, 1991.
Reiz S, Haggmark S, Johansson G. Nath S: Cardiotoxicity of ropivacaine: A new amide local anaesthetic agent. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 33:93-98, 1989.
Nancarrow C, Rutten AJ, Runciman WB. Mather LE. Carapetis RJ, Mclean CF, Hipkins SF: Myocardial and cerebral drug concentrations and the mechanisms of death after fatal intravenous doses of lidocaine, bupivacaine and ropivacaine in sheep. Anesth Analg 69:276-283, 1989.
Scott DB, Lee A. Fagan D, Bowler GMR, Bloomfield P, Lundh R: Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared with that of bupivacaine, Anesth Analg 69:563-569, 1989.
Zaric D, Axelsson K, Nydahl PA. Philipson L, Larson P, Jansson J: Sensory and motor blockade during epidural analgesia with 1%, 0.75% and 0.5% ropivacaine: A double-blind study. Anesth Analg 72:509-515, 1991.
Santos AC, Arthur GR. Roberts DJ, Wlody D. Pedersen H. Morishima HO, Finster M, Covino BG: Effect of ropivacaine and bupivacaine on uterine blood flow in pregnant ewes. Anesth Analg 74:62-67, 1992.
Bromage PR, Burfort MF, Crowell DE, Pettigrew RT: Quality of epidural blockade: I Influence of physical factors. Br J Anaesth 36:342-352, 1964.
Amiel-Tison C. Barrier G, Shnider SM, Levinson G, Hughes SC, Stefani SJ: A new neurologic and adaptive capacity scoring system for evaluating obstetric medications in full term neonates. ANESTHESIOLOGY 56:340-350, 1982.
Scanlon JW, Brown WU, Weiss JB, Alper MH: Neurobehavioral responses of newborn infants after maternal epidural anesthesia. ANESTHESIOLOGY 40:121-128, 1974.
Bjork M, Petterson KJ, Osterlof G: Capillary gas chromatographic method for the simultaneous determination of local anaesthetic in plasma samples. J Chromatogr 533:229-234, 1990.
Arvidsson T. Eklund E: Determination of free fraction of ropivacaine and bupivacaine in blood plasma by ultrafiltration and coupled column liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr (in press).
Albright GA: Cardiac arrest following regional anesthesia with etidocaine or bupivacaine. ANESTHESIOLOGY 51:285-287, 1979.
Morishima HO, Pedersen H, Finster M, Hiroaka H, Tsuji A, Feldman HS, Arthur GR, Covino BG: Bupivacaine toxicity in pregnant and nonpregnant ewes. ANESTHESIOLOGY 63:134-139, 1985.
Santos AC, Arthur GR, Pedersen H, Morishima HO, Finster M, Covino BG: Systemic toxicity of ropivacaine during ovine pregnancy. ANESTHESIOLOGY 75:137-141, 1991.
Bader AM, Datta S, Flanagan H. Covino BG: Comparison of bupivacaine and ropivacaine conduction blockade in the isolated rabbit vagus nerve. Analg 68:724-727, 1989.
Datta S, Corke BC, Alper MH, Ostheimer GW, Weiss JB: Epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: A comparison of bupivacaine, chloroprocaine and etidocaine. ANESTHESIOLOGY 52:48-51, 1980.
Rosenberg PH, Kytta J, Alila A: Absorption of bupivacaine, etidocaine, lignocaine and ropivacaine into n-heptane, rat sciatic nerve, and human extradural and subcutaneous fat. Br J Anaesth 58:310-314, 1986.
Rutten AJ, Mather LE, Nancarrow C, Sloan PA, Mclean CF: Cardiovascular effects and regional clearances of intravenous ropivacaine in sheep. Anesth Analg 70:577-582, 1990.
Arthur GR, Feldman HS, Covino BG: Comparative pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine and ropivacaine, a new amide local anesthetic. Anesth Analg 67:1053-1058, 1988.
Morrison LMM, Emanuelsson BM, McClure JH, Pollack AJ, McKeown DW, Brockway M. Jozwiak H, Wildsmith JA: Efficacy and kinetics of extradural ropivacaine: Comparison with bupivacaine: Br J Anaesth 72:164-169, 1994.
Wlody DJ, Santos AC, Arthur GR, Finster M. Dearmas P: Toxicity of ropivacaine and bupivacaine in pregnant and non-pregnant ewes: A comparative study (abstract). ANESTHESIOLOGY 81:A1138, 1994.
Figure 1. Levels of onset of sensory epidural anesthesia as a function of time for ropivacaine and bupivacaine.
Figure 1. Levels of onset of sensory epidural anesthesia as a function of time for ropivacaine and bupivacaine.
Figure 1. Levels of onset of sensory epidural anesthesia as a function of time for ropivacaine and bupivacaine.
×
Figure 2. Levels of offset of sensory epidural anesthesia as a function of time for ropivacaine and bupivacaine.
Figure 2. Levels of offset of sensory epidural anesthesia as a function of time for ropivacaine and bupivacaine.
Figure 2. Levels of offset of sensory epidural anesthesia as a function of time for ropivacaine and bupivacaine.
×
Figure 3. Plasma concentrations of ropivacaine versus time for ten patients.
Figure 3. Plasma concentrations of ropivacaine versus time for ten patients.
Figure 3. Plasma concentrations of ropivacaine versus time for ten patients.
×
Figure 4. Plasma concentrations of bupivacaine versus time for ten individual patients.
Figure 4. Plasma concentrations of bupivacaine versus time for ten individual patients.
Figure 4. Plasma concentrations of bupivacaine versus time for ten individual patients.
×
Table 1. Patient Characteristics
Image not available
Table 1. Patient Characteristics
×
Table 2. Motor Blockade
Image not available
Table 2. Motor Blockade
×
Table 3. Mean (plus/minus SE) Value for Maternal Heart Rate and Blood Pressure
Image not available
Table 3. Mean (plus/minus SE) Value for Maternal Heart Rate and Blood Pressure
×
Table 4. Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Image not available
Table 4. Pharmacokinetic Parameters
×