Free
Meeting Abstracts  |   April 1995
Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Ventilation Elicits Increases in Endogenously Formed Nitric Oxide as Detected in Air Exhaled by Rabbits
Author Notes
  • (Persson) Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology.
  • (Lonnqvist) Senior Anesthesiologist, Department of Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care, St. Goran's Hospital.
  • (Gustafsson) Associate Professor, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, and Institute of Environmental Medicine.
  • Received from the Department of Physiology and Pharmacology and the Department of Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care, St. Goran's Hospital, and the Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. Submitted for publication June 16, 1994. Accepted for publication December 15, 1994. Supported by The Swedish Medical Research Council (project 7919), the Swedish National Environment Protection Board, The Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, The Swedish Society Against Asthma and Allergy, Magn, Bergvall Foundations, The AGA Medical Research Fund, Stiftelsen Lars Hiertas minne, Stiftelsen Ragnhild och Einar Lundstoms minne. The Tore Nilssons fund, Ake Wibergs fund, and the Karolinska Institute.
  • Address reprint requests to Dr. Persson: Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institute, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Article Information
Meeting Abstracts   |   April 1995
Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Ventilation Elicits Increases in Endogenously Formed Nitric Oxide as Detected in Air Exhaled by Rabbits
Anesthesiology 4 1995, Vol.82, 969-974.. doi:
Anesthesiology 4 1995, Vol.82, 969-974.. doi:
Key words: Lung(s): stretch, Mediators, nitric oxide. Nerves, vagus; vagotomy. Ventilation: positive end-expiratory pressure.
INCREASED expiratory pressure is used in patients whose lungs are mechanically ventilated (positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP]) and in spontaneously breathing patients (continuous positive airway pressure [CPAP]) with pulmonary disease in an attempt to improve the oxygenation of blood. The beneficial effect on oxygenation by PEEP or CPAP is attributed to an increase in functional residual capacity. [1] Thus, the opening of previously closed alveoli is probably the greatest single advantage of PEEP or CPAP. [2] In addition, PEEP or CPAP decreases airway resistance according to the inverse relation between lung volume and airway resistance. [2] Accordingly, PEEP is known to reduce shunt blood flow in the lungs. [3] Furthermore, reductions in lung water by PEEP or CPAP have been proposed, [4] although that effect remains controversial. [5] .
There is evidence indicating that endogenous nitric oxide (NO) has a key role in pulmonary function. Thus, NO has been demonstrated to participate in pulmonary vascular regulation. [6,7] Furthermore, NO formed from L-arginine and likely derived from epithelium [8,9] or nerves [10] within the respiratory system can be detected in exhaled air, with stable concentrations at rest. [11] In humans a substantial part of the NO detected in exhaled air is derived from the upper airways. [12] Increased concentrations of exhaled NO have been found in response to exposure of the lower airways to the bronchoconstrictive agent prostaglandin F2Oand during bronchoconstriction induced by allergen in sensitized animals. [13] In addition, increased amounts of NO can be detected in exhaled air during exercise. [14] Despite these studies little is known about how changes in exhaled NO are actually stimulated.
The aim of the current study was to investigate whether PEEP affects lung formation of NO, and if it does, to elucidate vagal influences in this process. A second objective was to study the effects of PEEP on arterial blood gases before and after inhibition of endogenous NO formation.
Materials and Methods
The experiments were approved by the local animal ethics committee. Fourteen New Zealand White rabbits (2-3 kg) were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (6 mg *symbol* ml sup -1, 50-60 mg *symbol* kg sup -1 body weight; Mebumal Vet., Nord Vacc, Uppsala, Sweden) via an ear vein. Breathing was facilitated by tracheal cannulation, and the animals lungs were ventilated with a constant-volume ventilator (683, Harvard, South Natick, MA) adjusted to keep blood gases normal (40 breaths *symbol* min sup -1, 250 ml *symbol* min sup -1, fraction of inspired oxygen 0.21). The air supplied to the ventilator was rendered free of NO (< 1 part per billion [ppb]) by filtering through a large charcoal filter (150 x 12 cm). Catheters containing heparin (500 IU *symbol* ml sup -1; Kabi Pharmacia, Stockholm, Sweden) were inserted in the left carotid artery for blood pressure recordings and in the right jugular vein for administration of a continuous infusion of glucose (2.5 g *symbol* 100 ml sup -1), dextran 70 (3.0 g *symbol* 100 ml sup -1), sodium bicarbonate (0.7 g *symbol* 100 ml sup -1), and pentobarbital sodium (360 mg *symbol* 100 ml sup -1) at 5 ml *symbol* kg sup -1 *symbol* h sup -1 by means of a syringe pump (STC-521, Terumo, Tokyo, Japan). Blood pressure was recorded with a pressure transducer (Statham, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico) and polygraph (Grass, Quincy, MA). Rectal temperature was maintained at 37-38 degrees Celsius by means of a heating pad connected to a thermostat (Wittman-Hereaus, Heidelberg, Germany). Drugs were infused through the venous catheter and administered by a microinfusion pump (CMA 100, Carnegie Medical, Stockholm, Sweden).
PEEP was achieved by positioning the end of a tube connected to the outlet of the ventilator into a precalibrated water container. A 4-min period was allowed at each PEEP level, and measurements were performed after 1 and 4 min of PEEP. Increasing levels of PEEP were applied in a cumulative fashion (Figure 1). When the effect of L-Nomega-arginine-methylester (L-NAME) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) or vagotomy was studied, two dose-response curves for increment levels of PEEP were applied, with a 15-min resting period allowed between them. Thereafter, vagotomy or slow intravenous injection of L-NAME was performed, after which a third dose-response curve for the PEEP-induced increases in NO was obtained.
Figure 1. A recording of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) in the control situation (positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] = 0), and during 4-min periods of increasing PEEP (5, 10, and 15 cmH2O). The concentration of NO is given in parts per billion (ppb).
Figure 1. A recording of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) in the control situation (positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] = 0), and during 4-min periods of increasing PEEP (5, 10, and 15 cmH2O). The concentration of NO is given in parts per billion (ppb).
Figure 1. A recording of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) in the control situation (positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] = 0), and during 4-min periods of increasing PEEP (5, 10, and 15 cmH2O). The concentration of NO is given in parts per billion (ppb).
×
NO was analyzed on a chemiluminescence system (NOA 270, Sievers, Boulder, CO) set at an integration time of 0.12 s. A gas flow of 150 ml *symbol* min sup -1, controlled by a precision flow meter (Brooks Instrument B. V., Veenendaal, Netherlands) and a working pressure of 7-9 mmHg was obtained by a vacuum pump (18 Two Stage, Edwards High Vacuum, Crawley, Sussex, United Kingdom). The NO analyzer was calibrated by means of mass flow controllers (Bronkhorst, Ruurlo, Holland), with dilutions in filtered air of a certified NO standard gas in nitrogen (AGA Specialgas, Lidingo, Sweden). The final concentration of NO in the calibration gas was 2. 5, 10, 50, 100, and 200 ppb (accuracy plus/minus 5%). Sampling of exhaled air was performed by means of a catheter positioned within the tracheostomy tube. The NO-analyzer was supplied with a gas flow of 150 ml *symbol* min sup -1 of exhaled air. In control experiments in which the animal was replaced with a rubber balloon attached to the tracheostomy tube, and ventilated with a fixed concentration of NO (30 ppb), application of PEEP did not affect the measured concentration of NO. Thus, the observed changes in NO concentration are unlikely to be the result of pressure changes in the ventilator system.
Arterial blood was obtained from a cannula inserted via a femoral artery, with the tip positioned slightly above the aortic bifurcation. Blood gases were analyzed on a pH-blood gas analyzer (IL1306, Instrumentation Laboratories Spa., Milano, Italy).
In one set of experiments (n = 3) cardiac output was measured. A median sternotomy was performed and an ultrasonic flow probe (R6, Transonic Systems, Ithaca, NY) was applied on the ascending aorta and connected to a blood flow meter (T-201, Transonic Systems). Blood flow in the ascending aorta was taken as a measure of cardiac output. In this set of experiments a PEEP of 10 cmH2O was applied for 4 min during continuous measurement of cardiac output, and 10 min after the recovery from PEEP cardiac output was reduced to the same level as during PEEP by obstructing the pulmonary artery for 4 min by means of a strap around the artery. The latter procedure allowed graded and stable reductions in cardiac output.
In another set of experiments (n = 7) bilateral vagotomy was performed by transecting the vagal nerves at the laryngeal level. Simultaneously, the depressor nerves [15] were transected bilaterally. For simplicity, the combined nerve transection procedure is referred to as vagotomy in the text. The effect of 10 cm PEEP before and after vagotomy was studied.
In all cases 45 min was allowed before experimentation to obtain stable circulatory conditions.
Statistical data are given as means plus/minus SEM, and statistical significance was calculated by analysis of variance or two-tailed Students t test for paired or unpaired observations. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
During a 30-min control period the measured parameters remained stable. Thus, mean arterial blood pressure was 89 plus/minus 7 mmHg, heart rate 259 plus/minus 27 beats *symbol* min sup -1, arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) 75 plus/minus 12 mmHg, and the concentration of NO in exhaled air 19 plus/minus 4 ppb (n = 13).
Introduction of PEEP elicited dose-dependent and highly reproducible increments in exhaled NO and in PaO2. The increase in exhaled NO exhibited a biphasic pattern with an initial peak followed by a slow and partial reversal during the 4-min observation period at each level of PEEP (Figure 1and Figure 2). Thus, at a PEEP of 10 cmH2O exhaled NO initially increased from 19 plus/minus 4 to 30 plus/minus 5 ppb (P < 0.001, n = 9) with a subsequent decrease to 27 plus/minus 5 ppb (P < 0.005) at the end of a 4-min observation period. Simultaneously PaO2increased from 75 plus/minus 12 mmHg in the control situation to 105 plus/minus 11 mmHg (P < 0.05) at a PEEP of 10 cmH2O. In addition, PEEP induced dose-dependent reductions in systemic arterial blood pressure. Thus, at a PEEP of 10 cmH2O mean arterial blood pressure decreased to 45 plus/minus 7 mmHg (P < 0.01) (Table 1). Heart rate was not significantly affected by PEEP.
Figure 2. (A) Dose-response curve for positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced increments in exhaled nitric oxide (NO) at peak NO concentration. (B) Dose-response curve for PEEP-induced increments in exhaled NO at the end of a 4-min period of PEEP at each level. Data are expressed as relative increase in NO compared with concentration during ventilation without PEEP. Level of statistical significance (analysis of variance) in comparison with NO concentration during ventilation without PEEP: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; n = 9.
Figure 2. (A) Dose-response curve for positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced increments in exhaled nitric oxide (NO) at peak NO concentration. (B) Dose-response curve for PEEP-induced increments in exhaled NO at the end of a 4-min period of PEEP at each level. Data are expressed as relative increase in NO compared with concentration during ventilation without PEEP. Level of statistical significance (analysis of variance) in comparison with NO concentration during ventilation without PEEP: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; n = 9.
Figure 2. (A) Dose-response curve for positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced increments in exhaled nitric oxide (NO) at peak NO concentration. (B) Dose-response curve for PEEP-induced increments in exhaled NO at the end of a 4-min period of PEEP at each level. Data are expressed as relative increase in NO compared with concentration during ventilation without PEEP. Level of statistical significance (analysis of variance) in comparison with NO concentration during ventilation without PEEP: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; n = 9.
×
Table 1. Effect of PEEP on Arterial Blood pH, PO2and PCO2. Mean Arterial Blood Pressure (MAP), and Nitric Oxide Concentrations in Exhaled Air at Peak and Plateau Levels (n = 14).
Image not available
Table 1. Effect of PEEP on Arterial Blood pH, PO2and PCO2. Mean Arterial Blood Pressure (MAP), and Nitric Oxide Concentrations in Exhaled Air at Peak and Plateau Levels (n = 14).
×
Systematic treatment of the animals with the NO synthase inhibitor L-NAME (30 mg *symbol* kg sup -1 intravenously) abolished NO in exhaled air during control conditions and during PEEP at all tested levels. In addition, L-NAME (30 mg *symbol* kg sup -1 intravenously) increased mean arterial blood pressure from 78 plus/minus 6 to 97 plus/minus 5 mmHg. In the presence of L-NAME the PEEP-induced increments in PaO2were similar to those in the control situation. Thus, PaO2increased from 72 plus/minus 8 to 98 plus/minus 22 mmHg with PEEP (10 cmH2O, n = 4).
In additional experiments the effect of vagotomy on the PEEP-induced increments in exhaled NO was studied. Consecutive applications of PEEP (10 cmH2O) induced reproducible increases in NO. After bilateral vagotomy including bilateral transection of the depressor nerves the increase in exhaled NO in response to PEEP was significantly reduced (P < 0.01, n = 7) (Figure 3). Vagotomy did not alter the concentration of NO in exhaled air in the absence of PEEP.
Figure 3. Relative increase in concentration of nitric oxide (NO) in exhaled air in response to ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (10 cmH2O) before (open bar) and after (hatched bar) bilateral vagotomy including lesion of the depressor nerves. Level of statistical significance (Student's t test for paired variables) for the effect of vagotomy: **P < 0.01; n = 7.
Figure 3. Relative increase in concentration of nitric oxide (NO) in exhaled air in response to ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (10 cmH2O) before (open bar) and after (hatched bar) bilateral vagotomy including lesion of the depressor nerves. Level of statistical significance (Student's t test for paired variables) for the effect of vagotomy: **P < 0.01; n = 7.
Figure 3. Relative increase in concentration of nitric oxide (NO) in exhaled air in response to ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (10 cmH2O) before (open bar) and after (hatched bar) bilateral vagotomy including lesion of the depressor nerves. Level of statistical significance (Student's t test for paired variables) for the effect of vagotomy: **P < 0.01; n = 7.
×
To elucidate the importance of gross hemodynamic influences in the effect of PEEP (Table 1) on NO in exhaled air the effect of PEEP on cardiac output was studied, and the effect of similar changes of cardiac output on exhaled NO was measured. In these experiments PEEP (10 cmH2O) induced a reduction in cardiac output from 317 plus/minus 36 to 235 plus/minus 30 ml *symbol* min sup -1 (P < 0.01, n = 3) and an increase in exhaled NO from 23 plus/minus 6 to 30 plus/minus 7 ppb (peak concentration, P < 0.05, n = 3). Reduction in cardiac output from 300 plus/minus 67 to 223 plus/minus 52 ml *symbol* min sup -1 by partially obstructing the pulmonary artery (see methods) caused an insignificant increase in exhaled NO, from 23 plus/minus 7 to 25 plus/minus 6 (n = 3). The exhaled NO concentration during partial pulmonary artery obstruction was consistently and significantly less (P < 0.05) than exhaled NO during 10 cmH2O PEEP.
Discussion
The results of this study demonstrate that PEEP induces an increase in the concentration of NO in exhaled air. This effect presumably involves vagal mechanisms and is only to a minor degree influenced by the hemodynamic changes caused by PEEP.
PEEP levels frequently used in clinical practice were found to induce dose-dependent increments in exhaled NO in anesthetized rabbits. Considering the emerging knowledge of the considerable influence of NO on pulmonary function, [7,16-18],* the current observation may help in the understanding of the role of endogenous NO in lung function. Furthermore, the current observation opens the possibility that the increase in exhaled NO observed in response to agonist or antigen-induced bronchoconstriction [13] is the result of increased tension in the airway wall or stretch of the lung parenchyma.
Theoretically, several mechanisms may explain the observed increase in NO with PEEP. First, PEEP increases functional residual capacity and reduces airway resistance. [2] This effect likely increases the surface area of the respiratory epithelium exposed to air. Formation of NO in epithelium has been suggested by functional and morphologic studies. [9,14,19] Provided that the NO detected in exhaled air is formed in the epithelium, such a mechanism could explain the increase in NO with PEEP. However, tidal volumes were kept constant in the current experiments, and on application of PEEP there was an initial peak in the concentration of NO in exhaled air, after which NO decreased to less markedly increased levels. This makes the increased airway wall surface area and its increased exposure to air unlikely as a single explanation for the increased NO in exhaled air. Second, PEEP causes hemodynamic alterations, with a decrease in cardiac output as a prominent effect. [20] Complete obstruction of pulmonary blood flow induces profound increments in exhaled NO. [11] However, when cardiac output was decreased by means of increasing pulmonary artery resistance in the current study, NO in exhaled air increased only moderately (or not at all), arguing against blood flow change as a reason for the increase in exhaled NO. In addition, changes in the tone of the pulmonary vasculature are not likely to explain the observed increments in exhaled NO, because pulmonary vasodilatation induced by infusion of adenosine elicits only a small effect on exhaled endogenous NO. [21] The PEEP-induced increase in exhaled NO has also been observed during lung perfusion with constant flow conditions.** Thus, changes in pulmonary blood circulation within the physiologic range seem less likely as an explanation for the effect of PEEP on NO in exhaled air, although contribution from such a mechanism can not be excluded. Finally, stretch of airways and lung parenchyma induced by PEEP is a conceivable stimulus for increased NO formation, analogous to the stretch-induced release of NO reported to occur in vascular endothelial cells. [22] Involvement of a stretch-sensitive mechanism is supported in the current study by the observation that there was an initial peak in the concentration of NO in exhaled air, after which NO returned to concentrations closer to control on continued application of PEEP. Furthermore, the PEEP-induced increase in exhaled NO was attenuated by lesion of vagal and depressor nerves. Although the NO detected in exhaled air of rabbits likely is derived primarily from airway epithelium, [11] pulmonary nerves of vagal origin have been suggested to release NO as an inhibitory neurotransmitter, [10,23] and in addition to the epithelium. NO synthase-like immunoreactivity has been observed in neurons within the lung. [8,9] In accordance, it is possible that a stretch-sensitive and vagally dependent mechanism involves NO as a local effector mechanism. The type of cell that is stimulated by stretch cannot yet be identified, although epithelial and endothelial cells must be considered.
L-NAME, which inhibits NO formation and abolishes exhaled endogenous NO, [11] did not affect the PEEP-induced increments in Pa sub O2. This observation and the small effect on exhaled NO of reductions in pulmonary blood flow support the suggestion that exhaled NO primarily reflects bronchial, rather than vascular NO production. An increase in exhaled amounts of NO has been observed during hyperventilation and exercise in humans, [14] and the current observations may offer an initial insight into the mechanism of this effect.
In conclusion, PEEP elicited dose-dependent increments in exhaled NO. This effect may be attributed in part to a vagally mediated mechanism. Ongoing studies will reveal if this mechanism is present also in humans.
*Falke KJ, Roissant R, Keitel M, Pison U, Slama K, Lopez F, Gruning T, Zapol WM: Successful treatment of severe adult respiratory distress syndrome with nitric oxide: The first three patients. Moncada S, Marletta MA, Hibbs JB, eds. Book of abstracts, 2nd International Meeting, Biology of Nitric Oxide. London, September 30-October 2, 1991.
**Lonnqvist PA, Gustafsson LE, Persson MG: Unpublished observations. 1994.
REFERENCES
Hill JD, Main FB, Osborn JJ, Gerbode F: Correct use of respirator on cardiac patient after operation. Arch Surg 91:775-778, 1965.
Nunn JF: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), Nunns Applied Respiratory Physiology. Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1993, pp 451-463.
Bindslev LG, Hedenstierna G, Santesson J, Gottlieb I, Carvallhas A: Ventilation-perfusion distribution during inhalation anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 25:360-371, 1981.
Shapiro BA, Cane RD, Harrison RA: Positive end-expiratory pressure therapy in adults with special reference to acute lung injury: A review of the literature and suggested clinical correlations. Crit Care Med 12:127-141, 1984.
Frostell C, Blomqvist H, Wickerts CJ: Effects of PEEP on extravascular lung water and central blood volume in the dog. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 31:711-716, 1987.
Archer SL, Tolins JP, Raij L, Weir EK: Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction is enhanced by inhibition of the synthesis of an endothelium derived relaxing factor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 164:1198-1205, 1989.
Persson MG, Gustafsson LE, Wiklund NP, Moncada S, Hedqvist P: Endogenous nitric oxide as a probable modulator of pulmonary circulation and hypoxic pressor response in vivo. Acta Physiol Scand 140:449-457, 1990.
Fischer A, Mundel P, Mayer B, Preissler U, Phillipin B, Kummer W: Nitric oxide synthase in guinea pig lower airway innervation Neurosci Lett 149:157-160, 1992.
Kobzik L, Bredt DS, Lowenstein CJ, Drazen, Gaston B, Sugarbaker D, Stamler JS: Nitric oxide synthase in human and rat lung: Immunocytochemical and histochemical localization. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 9:371-377, 1993.
Belvisi MG, Stretton CD, Yacoub M, Barnes PJ: Nitric oxide is the endogenous neurotransmitter of bronchodilator nerves in humans. Eur J Pharmacol 210:221-222, 1992.
Gustafsson LE, Leone AM, Persson MG, Wiklund NP, Moncada S: Endogenous nitric oxide is present in the exhaled air of rabbits, guinea pigs and humans. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 181:852-857, 1991.
Gerlach H, Rossaint R, Pappert D, Knorr M, Falke KJ: Autoinhalation of nitric oxide after endogenous synthesis in nasopharynx. Lancer 343:518-519, 1994.
Persson MG, Gustafsson LE: Allergen-induced airway obstruction in guinea pigs is associated with changes in nitric oxide levels in exhaled air. Acta Physiol Scand 149:461-466, 1993.
Persson MG, Wiklund NP, Gustafsson LE: Endogenous nitric oxide in single exhalations and the change during exercise. Am Rev Respir Dis 148:1210-1214, 1993.
Kaplan HM: The neck, The Rabbit in Experimental Physiology. 2nd edition. New York, Scholars Library, 1962.
Jorens PG, Vermiere PA, Herman AG: L-arginine-dependent nitric oxide synthase: A new metabolic pathway in the lung and airway. Eur Respir J 6:258-266, 1993.
Gaston B, Drazen JM, Loscalzo J, Stamler JS: The biology of nitrogen oxides in the airways. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 149:538-551, 1994.
Frostell C, Fratacci MD, Wain JC, Jones R, Zapol WM: Inhaled nitric oxide: A selective pulmonary vasodilator reversing hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Circulation 83:2038-2047, 1991.
Schmidt HH, Gagne GD, Nakane M, Pollock JS, Miller MF, Murad F: Mapping of neural nitric oxide synthase in the rat suggests frequent co-localization with NADPH diaphorase but not with soluble guanylyl cyclase, and novel paraneural functions for nitrinergic signal transduction. J Histochem Cytochem 40:1439-1456, 1992.
Kumar A, Falke KJ, Geffin B, Aldredge CF, Laver MB, Lowenstein E, Pontoppidan H: Continuous positive-pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure: Effects on hemodynamics and lung function. N Engl J Med 283:1430-1436, 1970.
Persson MG, Agvald P, Gustafsson LE: Detection of nitric oxide in exhaled air during administration of nitroglycerin in vivo. Br J Pharmacol 111:825-828, 1994.
Dainty LA, McGrath JC, Spedding M, Templeton AGB: The influence of the initial stretch and the agonist-induced tone on the effect of basal and stimulated release of EDRF. Br J Pharmacol 100:767-773, 1990.
Brown RH, Zerhouni EA, Hirshman CA: Reversal of bronchoconstriction by inhaled nitric oxide, histamine versus methacholine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 150:233-237, 1994.
Figure 1. A recording of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) in the control situation (positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] = 0), and during 4-min periods of increasing PEEP (5, 10, and 15 cmH2O). The concentration of NO is given in parts per billion (ppb).
Figure 1. A recording of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) in the control situation (positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] = 0), and during 4-min periods of increasing PEEP (5, 10, and 15 cmH2O). The concentration of NO is given in parts per billion (ppb).
Figure 1. A recording of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) in the control situation (positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] = 0), and during 4-min periods of increasing PEEP (5, 10, and 15 cmH2O). The concentration of NO is given in parts per billion (ppb).
×
Figure 2. (A) Dose-response curve for positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced increments in exhaled nitric oxide (NO) at peak NO concentration. (B) Dose-response curve for PEEP-induced increments in exhaled NO at the end of a 4-min period of PEEP at each level. Data are expressed as relative increase in NO compared with concentration during ventilation without PEEP. Level of statistical significance (analysis of variance) in comparison with NO concentration during ventilation without PEEP: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; n = 9.
Figure 2. (A) Dose-response curve for positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced increments in exhaled nitric oxide (NO) at peak NO concentration. (B) Dose-response curve for PEEP-induced increments in exhaled NO at the end of a 4-min period of PEEP at each level. Data are expressed as relative increase in NO compared with concentration during ventilation without PEEP. Level of statistical significance (analysis of variance) in comparison with NO concentration during ventilation without PEEP: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; n = 9.
Figure 2. (A) Dose-response curve for positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced increments in exhaled nitric oxide (NO) at peak NO concentration. (B) Dose-response curve for PEEP-induced increments in exhaled NO at the end of a 4-min period of PEEP at each level. Data are expressed as relative increase in NO compared with concentration during ventilation without PEEP. Level of statistical significance (analysis of variance) in comparison with NO concentration during ventilation without PEEP: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; n = 9.
×
Figure 3. Relative increase in concentration of nitric oxide (NO) in exhaled air in response to ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (10 cmH2O) before (open bar) and after (hatched bar) bilateral vagotomy including lesion of the depressor nerves. Level of statistical significance (Student's t test for paired variables) for the effect of vagotomy: **P < 0.01; n = 7.
Figure 3. Relative increase in concentration of nitric oxide (NO) in exhaled air in response to ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (10 cmH2O) before (open bar) and after (hatched bar) bilateral vagotomy including lesion of the depressor nerves. Level of statistical significance (Student's t test for paired variables) for the effect of vagotomy: **P < 0.01; n = 7.
Figure 3. Relative increase in concentration of nitric oxide (NO) in exhaled air in response to ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (10 cmH2O) before (open bar) and after (hatched bar) bilateral vagotomy including lesion of the depressor nerves. Level of statistical significance (Student's t test for paired variables) for the effect of vagotomy: **P < 0.01; n = 7.
×
Table 1. Effect of PEEP on Arterial Blood pH, PO2and PCO2. Mean Arterial Blood Pressure (MAP), and Nitric Oxide Concentrations in Exhaled Air at Peak and Plateau Levels (n = 14).
Image not available
Table 1. Effect of PEEP on Arterial Blood pH, PO2and PCO2. Mean Arterial Blood Pressure (MAP), and Nitric Oxide Concentrations in Exhaled Air at Peak and Plateau Levels (n = 14).
×