Free
Correspondence  |   October 1995
Low-frequency Component of Heart Rate Variability
Author Notes
  • Robert P. S. Introna, M.D., Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912-2700.
  • Nicola Montano, M.D., Ph.D., Centro Ricerche Cardiovasculari CNR, Medicina Interna II, Ospedale L. Sacco, Universita di Milano, 20157 Milano, Italy.
  • Edmund H. Yodlowski, Ph.D., Dan C. Martin, M.D., Jack K. Pruett, Ph.D., Robert S. Crumrine, M.D., Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912-2700.
Article Information
Correspondence
Correspondence   |   October 1995
Low-frequency Component of Heart Rate Variability
Anesthesiology 10 1995, Vol.83, 884-886.. doi:
Anesthesiology 10 1995, Vol.83, 884-886.. doi:
To the Editor:--The data provided by Hopf et al. [1] are interesting and provocative. Their conclusions are in stark contrast to the large number of reports published during the last 10 yr and especially the last 2 yr [2-5] that further specified the methodology needed to use the low-frequency spectral component as a marker of sympathetic modulation. These authors state that, after segmental epidural anesthesia (C6-T6) in 10 patients, low-frequency spectral power did not change significantly, therefore low-frequency spectral power of heart rate variability is unlikely to reflect cardiac sympathetic modulation.
Beginning with the report by Akselrod et al. [6] and continuing to the present, investigators have debated the degree of sympathetic-parasympathetic contribution to the low-frequency component of heart rate variability. The early interpretation that sympathetic and parasympathetic modulations contributed to the origin of the low-frequency component was related mainly to the experimental approach followed by the investigators. [6,7] For example, with parasympathetic blockade by atropine, the low-frequency component in absolute units is reduced, in accordance with the dramatic decrease in total variance, thus leading to the hypothesis of a parasympathetic contribution to this low-frequency oscillation. However, if one considers the low-/high-frequency ratio or the low frequency in normalized units, one would observe the prevalence in these conditions of the low-frequency component accordingly with the sympathetic predominance induced by atropine. [8] Montano et al. [4] reported that the low- and high-frequency components expressed in normalized units (nu) and low-/high-frequency ratio provided the best estimates of graded changes in sympathovagal balance. Similarly, situations characterized by a sympathetic activation, such as tilt, mental stress, and coronary occlusion, are associated with an increase of low-frequency component (nu) or low-/high-frequency ratio. [8,9] 
In previous experiments, using a Fast Fourier transform (FFT) algorithm, we observed that the rostral spread of spinal anesthesia was associated with a progressive decrease of total variance in both low-and high-frequency components of the HRV spectra. [10] We recently confirmed those data analyzing, by means of autoregressive spectral techniques, the HRV of 24 women who received spinal anesthesia for postpartum tubal ligation surgery. [11] The progressive cephalad spread of spinal block (from T4 to C7) was associated with a significant reduction in total variance, along with decreases in both low- and high-frequency components in absolute units, whereas low- and high-frequency (nu) as well as low-/high-frequency ratio were not significantly changed. A possible conclusion was that low and high frequency, and obviously total power, originate from an interaction of sympathetic and parasympathetic activities and that an acute subtraction of one component does not necessarily represent the best approach to understand the physiologic significance of cardiovascular rhythms. Similar results on the effects of spinal anesthesia on heart rate variability were obtained by Oberlander et al. [12] in premature infants and by Landry et al. [13] in adults. The latter study included patients with epidural anesthesia, and the results were not different from those of patients receiving spinal anesthesia. The patients in the study by Hopf et al. [1] were scheduled for thoracic and upper abdominal surgery, and although the specific surgical procedures and underlying conditions were not discussed, the state of the patients' health could have contributed to the results. [3,5] Moreover, the norepinephrine levels in their patients did not increase during 40-degree tilt, which is known to activate the sympathetic nervous system, before epidural block. The authors did not provide a reason why they chose the low-frequency band of 0.06-0.15 Hz. Most other researchers report using a low-frequency cutoff of 0.02-0.04 Hz. This frequency range could significantly affect interpretation of the data.
A possible explanation of the differences between the results presented by Hopf et al. [1] and other studies [10-13] can be found in the authors' own introductory sentence, "Spinal sympathetic outflow during epidural anesthesia is attenuated by preganglionic blockade." [1] Therefore, if an attenuation, incomplete blockade, of the cardiac sympathetic outflow results from epidural anesthesia, the phenomenon of central recruitment [14] might occur. In this phenomenon, available autonomic pathways that have survived epidural block can compensate by being recruited to carry the bulk of the remaining neural traffic to and from the heart. This possibility appears to suggest that the reason for the controversial results is that some sympathetic innervation to the heart remained intact to varying degrees. This theory is supported by our own report [11] as well as one that appeared in this journal during the writing of this letter. [15] In our paper, 4 of the 24 patients studied under spinal anesthesia had sensory level blocks to T3-T4 determined by pinprick and yet experienced inadequate surgical analgesia. Interestingly, in these four patients, HRV spectra were little changed from the preanesthetic spectra. In the remaining patients, spinal anesthesia had significantly depressed low-and high-frequency components as noted above.
Robert P. S. Introna, M.D., Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912-2700.
Nicola Montano, M.D., Ph.D., Centro Ricerche Cardiovasculari CNR, Medicina Interna II, Ospedale L. Sacco, Universita di Milano, 20157 Milano, Italy.
Edmund H. Yodlowski, Ph.D., Dan C. Martin, M.D., Jack K. Pruett, Ph.D., Robert S. Crumrine, M.D., Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912-2700.
(Accepted for publication July 18, 1995.)
REFERENCES
Hopf H-B, Skyschally A, Heusch G, Peters J: Low-frequency spectral power of heart rate variability is not a specific marker of cardiac sympathetic modulation. ANESTHESIOLOGY 82:609-619, 1995.
Guzzetti S, Cogliati C, Broggi C, Carozzi C, Caldiroli D, Lombardi F, Malliani A: Influences of neural mechanisms on heart period and arterial pressure variabilities in quadriplegic patients. Am J Physiol 266:H1112-H1120, 1994.
Malliani A, Lombardi F, Pagani M, Cerruti S: Power spectral analysis of cardiovascular variability in patients at risk for sudden cardiac death. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 5:274-286, 1994.
Montano N, Ruscone TG, Porta A, Lombardi F, Pagani M, Malliani A: Power spectrum analysis of heart rate variability to assess the changes in sympathovagal balance during orthostatic tilt. Circulation 90:1826-1831, 1994.
Kingwell BA, Thompson JM, Kaye DM, McPherson GA, Jennings GL, Esler MD: Heart rate spectral analysis, cardiac norepinephrine spillover, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity during human sympathetic nervous activation and failure. Circulation 90:234-240, 1994.
Akselrod S, Gordon D, Ubel FA, Shannon DC, Barger CA, Cohen RJ: Power spectral analysis of heart rate fluctuation: A quantitative probe of beat to beat cardiovascular control. Science 213:220-222, 1981.
Pomeranz B, Macaulay RJB, Caudill MA, Kutz I, Adam D, Gordon D, Kilborn KM, Barger AC, Shannon DC, Cohen RJ, Benson H: Assessment of autonomic function in humans by heart rate spectral analysis. Am J Physiol 248:H151-H153, 1985.
Malliani A, Pagani M, Lombardi F, Cerruti S: Cardiovascular neural regulation explored in the frequency domain. Circulation 84:482-492, 1991.
Rimoldi O, Pierini S, Ferrari A, Cerutti S, Pagani M, Malliani A: Analysis of short-term oscillations of R-R and arterial pressure in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol 258:H967-H976, 1990.
Pruett JK, Yodlowski EH, Introna RPS, Buggay DS, Crumrine RS: The influence of spinal anesthetics on heart rate variations. Pharmacology (Life Sci Adv) 10:51-55, 1991.
Introna R, Yodlowski E, Pruett J, Montano N, Porta A, Crumrine R: Sympathovagal effects of spinal anesthesia assessed by heart rate variability analysis. Anesth Analg 80:315-321, 1995.
Oberlander TF, Berde CB, Lam KH, Rappaport LA, Saul JP: Infants tolerate spinal anesthesia with minimal overall autonomic changes: Analysis of heart rate variability in former premature infants undergoing hernia repair. Anesth Analg 80:20-27, 1995.
Landry DP, Bennett FM, Oriol NE: Analysis of heart rate dynamics as a measure of autonomic tone in obstetrical patients undergoing epidural or spinal anesthesia. Reg Anesth 19:189-195, 1994.
Bromage PR: Physiology, Epidural Analgesia. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1978, pp 350-351.
Stevens RA, Beardsley D, White JL, Kao T-C, Gantt R, Holman S: Does spinal anesthesia result in a more complete sympathetic block than that from epidural anesthesia? ANESTHESIOLOGY 82:877-883, 1995.