Free
Meeting Abstracts  |   March 1995
Analysis of Drug Interaction between Intrathecal Clonidine and MK-801 in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Rat Model 
Author Notes
  • (Lee) Research Fellow, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego; Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • (Yaksh) Professor and Vice Chairman of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego.
  • Received from the Department of Anesthesiology, University of CAlifornia, San Diego, La Jolla, California. Submitted for publication May 24, 1994. Accepted for publication November 29, 1994.
  • Address reprint requests to Dr. Yaksh: Department of Anesthesiology, 0818, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093–0818.
Article Information
Meeting Abstracts   |   March 1995
Analysis of Drug Interaction between Intrathecal Clonidine and MK-801 in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Rat Model 
Anesthesiology 3 1995, Vol.82, 741-748. doi:
Anesthesiology 3 1995, Vol.82, 741-748. doi:
Key words: Measurement techniques: fixed-dose analysis; isobolographic analysis. Pain: neuropathic. Sympathetic neurons system, alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist: clonidine. Sympathetic neurons system, alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist: N-methyl-D-aspartate MK-801.
AFTER peripheral nerve injury in humans, a syndrome of events may be observed that includes a marked pain state evoked by a low-threshold tactile stimulus (e.g., allodynia) and dependency of this pain state on intact sympathetic function. [1 ] Recent laboratory work has led to an increased understanding of the mechanisms that may underlie this syndrome. Thus, ligation of the L5-L6 nerve roots in the rat will produce marked allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia that are reversed by sympathectomy. [2 ] It has been shown that sural nerve section and ligation triggers central sprouting of large myelinated afferents into the upper laminae of the dorsal horn. [3 ] Of additional interest, it has been shown that, after sciatic nerve ligation and transection, cathecolamine-containing terminals sprout into dorsal root ganglia and form basket-like structures around large-diameter axotomized sensory neurons and that, subsequently, preganglionic sympathetic stimulation can activate primary afferents in that root. [4 ].
Intrathecally administered alpha2-receptor agonists are known to exert a potent sympatholytic effect by a direct action on spinal preganglionic sympathetic neurons. [5 ]. In recent studies, it has been shown that spinal alpha2agonists will diminish the tactile hyperesthesia observed in rats after peripheral nerve lesion,* a finding consistent with reports that spinal clonidine attenuates sympathetically maintained pain in humans. [6,7 ] The observation that peripheral nerve injury may yield enhanced neuronal input (e.g., spontaneously active neuromas and ganglion cells)[8 ] and may induce postsynaptic change that leads to altered inhibitory function in the dorsal horn [9 ] has led to the speculation that the post-nerve injury hyperesthesia may reflect an example of facilitated discharge of wide dynamic range neurons (windup) in spinal cord, mediated in part by the activation of a spinal N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. [10,11 ] Potential changes in dorsal horn organization, leading to a loss of local inhibition, also may account for this altered encoding of the sensory message. Thus, the spinal delivery of GABA and glycine antagonists produces a severe touch-evoked agitation, and this effect was blocked by spinal NMDA receptor antagonists. [12 ] Subsequent studies further demonstrated that the tactile hyperesthesia resulting from nerve injury also can be blocked by spinal NMDA receptor antagonists. [13 ].
Given that post-nerve injury nociceptive behaviors are maintained both by sympathetic nerve activity and by NMDA receptor activation, an important issue is the nature of the interaction of these two mechanisms. If the role played by the NMDA receptor is strictly dependent on the activity purportedly induced by pre-ganglionic sympathetic neurons, it is possible that the two classes of agent interact in at most an additive manner, e.g., the smaller the sympathetic drive, the smaller the role played by the NMDA receptor. On the other hand, if the two systems are organized separately, they may interact in a synergistic (greater than additive) or occlusive (less than additive) fashion. Aside from the theoretical significance of this interaction, synergy between classes of agents with nonoverlapping side effects has particular clinical importance. The major side effect of clonidine is sedation, related to its supraspinal redistribution [14 ] and hypotension mediated by a spinal action [5 ] and that of MK-801 is motor weakness. [15 ] The characteristics of the antihyperesthesia interaction of the two classes of agents is of potential clinical significance, as joint use may serve to reduce the incidence of side effects produced by each class of agents.
In this study, we evaluated, using a fixed-dose analysis and an isobolographic paradigm, the nature of the spinal interaction between the alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine and the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 in attenuating the tactile hyperesthesia induced by ligation of the L5-L6 spinal nerve root of rat. [16 ].
Methods
Animal Preparation
The following investigations were carried out under a protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care Committee, University of California, San Diego.
Neuropathic Model.
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (weight 120–140 g; Harlan Industries, Indianapolis, IN) were housed in the vivarium and allowed to acclimate for 3–5 days using a 12/12 h day/night cycle. For creating the neuropathic rat model, the surgical procedure was performed according to the previous description by Kim and Chung. [16 ] Briefly, under halothane anesthesia (1% in air/O2, 50/50), a partial excision of left transverse process was made, and the left L5 and L6 spinal nerves were isolated and ligated tightly with 6–0 silk suture just distal to the dorsal root ganglion and proximal to the formation of the sciatic nerve. After a 7–10 day postoperative recovery period, the intrathecal catheter is placed.
Implantation of Intrathecal Catheters.
For spinal drug administration, rats were chronically implanted with catheters as previously described. [17 ] Briefly, under halothane anesthesia, the rat was placed in a stereotaxic head holder. The occipital muscles were separated from their attachment point and retracted caudal to expose the cisternal membrane at the base of the skull. Polyethylene tubing was passed caudally from the cisterna magna to the level of lumbar enlargement (8.5 cm). Animals will evidence of neuromuscular dysfunction were promptly killed.
Testing
Hyperesthesia.
For testing, the animals were placed individually in plastic cages with a wire mesh bottom. Behavioral accommodation was allowed for approximately 15 min until cage exploration and major grooming activities ceased. To test the tactile threshold required to evoke withdrawal of the stimulated paw, von Frey hair was applied to the paw of the ligated nerve (left) vertically for 3 or 4 s while the hair was bent a little. The area tested was the midplantar left hind paw, avoiding the tori (foot pads), in the sciatic nerve distribution. The 50% withdrawal threshold was determined using the up-down method initiating with the 2.0-G hair, in the middle of the series of 8 von Frey hairs with logarithmically incremental stiffness (0.41–15.1 g). [18 ] The resulting pattern of responses is tabulated and the 50% response threshold computed using the formula log (threshold, mg x 10)= X1+ kd, where X1= value (in log units) of the final von Frey hair used, k - correction factors based on pattern of responses from calibration table, and d = mean difference in log units between stimuli (here 0.224).
Side Effects.
After injection, general posture and ambulation were noted. Severe sedation was defined as a significant decrease in spontaneous activity and a loss of the orienting response to light stimulation. To Study the motor abnormality of hind limb function, the absence of placing and stepping reflex (flaccidity) was noted as an index of motor weakness. The placing and stepping responses of the hind limb were assessed by dragging the dorsum of the right unligated paw over an edge. This normally evokes a lifting and placing movement of the paw.
Drugs
Drugs employed were clonidine hydrochloride (molecular weight 267; Boehringer Ingelheim). MK-801 ((5R, 10S)-(+)-5-methyl-10, 11-dihydro-511-dibenzol[a,d]cyclohepten-5, 10-imine hydrogen maleate, dizocilpine; molecular weight 337; RBI), and atipamezole (molecular weight 249; FARMOS). Drugs were dissolved in saline and prepared to be delivered in a volume of 10 micro liter saline. The intrathecal drug administration is followed immediately by 10 micro liter saline to flush the catheter. Animals were randomly assigned to receive up to three different doses or drugs, with testing carried out at intervals of 5–7 days.
Experimental Paradigm
Dose-Response Curve.
The first series of experiments was performed to determine the dose-response and time course of intrathecally administered clonidine and MK-801. On the basis of preliminary studies, four dose levels of each clonidine, (3, 6, 10, and 20 micro gram) and MK-801 (1, 3, 10, and 20 micro gram) were examined to determine the dose that produced a %MPE of 50%(ED50).
Drug Interaction.
The second series of experiment was performed using the fixed-dose analysis and the isobolographic analysis to determine the drug interaction between clonidine and MK-801, as previously described. [19 ].
Using the fixed-dose analysis, we added a given dose of MK-801 (1 micro gram) in combination with clonidine 1, 3, or 10 micro gram. If the log dose-response curve for clonidine shows a left shift that exceeded the shift in the theoretical curve for clonidine produced by the simple addition of the effects produced by MK-801 1 micro gram alone, the interaction of the two drugs is defined as supra-additive or synergistic.
Using the isobolographic analysis, we determined the effects produced when combinations of intrathecal clonidine and MK-801 were jointly delivered such that the doses were a fixed fraction of the dose ration (1:1) but did not exceed 10 micro gram because of the flaccidity that began to appear with this dose of MK-801 alone. In this manner, we calculated the dose combination that yielded an ED50. The isobols were drawn by plotting the experimentally determined ED50value of clonidine on the Y axis and that of MK-801 on the X axis delivered alone and in combination. The theoretical ED50, assuming simple additivity and variance, was calculated according to the equation described by Tallarida et al. [20 ].
Antagonist.
To determine whether the effects of intrathecal clonidine alone and with MK-801 or MK-801 alone were mediated by an interaction with an alpha2receptor, the alpha2-adrenoceptor-selective antagonist (atipamezole 20 micro gram) was delivered intrathecally 10 min before injection of the clonidine (20 micro gram), MK-801 (10 micro gram), or combination of two agents (10 + 10 micro gram).
Data Analysis and Statistics
Threshold data from von Frey hair testing were converted to %MPE according to the formula Equation 1. The cutoff value was defined as stimulus intensities of 15 g (i.e., %MPE = 100 ). Dose-response and time course data are graphically presented as mean %MPE plus/minus SEM. The ED50values, slopes, and 95% confidence intervals are assessed using a dose-response analysis of Tallarida. [21 ] Statistical comparison of the difference between the effect of agents alone and with atipamezole were performed by paired t test. Critical values that achieve probability values of P < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
Results
General Appearance
After nerve ligation, all rats displayed normal general behavior and weight gain. The lesioned paw showed mild deformity and nail growing. Nevertheless, testing revealed that, after nerve ligation, all animals showed a marked tactile hyperesthesia, as evidenced by the ability to evoke a brisk withdrawal response with the von Frey hair, such that baseline mechanical thresholds required to evoke a brisk withdrawal of the stimulated paws before treatment were in the range of 1–3 g for all rats.
Dose-Response Curve
The intrathecal administration of either clonidine or MK-801 resulted in a dose-dependent increase in the mechanical threshold for tactile evoked withdrawal of the stimulated paw, with the peak effect of either drug occurring within 30 min (Figure 1and Figure 2). The ED sub 50 values, slopes, and 95%, confidence intervals for clonidine and MK-801 are presented in Table 1
Figure 1. Time-dependent reduction in tactile hyperesthesia (expressed as %MPE) produced by intrathecal injection of clonidine (CLON; top), MK-801 (MK; middle), and clonidine combined with MK-801 (CLON + MK; bottom) given in the doses indicated. Each line represents the mean %MPE with SEM bars in five or six rats.
Figure 1. Time-dependent reduction in tactile hyperesthesia (expressed as %MPE) produced by intrathecal injection of clonidine (CLON; top), MK-801 (MK; middle), and clonidine combined with MK-801 (CLON + MK; bottom) given in the doses indicated. Each line represents the mean %MPE with SEM bars in five or six rats.
Figure 1. Time-dependent reduction in tactile hyperesthesia (expressed as %MPE) produced by intrathecal injection of clonidine (CLON; top), MK-801 (MK; middle), and clonidine combined with MK-801 (CLON + MK; bottom) given in the doses indicated. Each line represents the mean %MPE with SEM bars in five or six rats.
×
Figure 2. Log dose-response curves for reduction in tactile hyperesthesia produced by intrathecal injection of clonidine alone, MK-801 alone, and clonidine combined with a fixed dose (1 micro gram) of MK-801 (CLON*). Doses above 20 micro gram MK were not carried out because of motor weakness. The left shift of ED50for CLON* than the ED50for CLON, even though added the effect for 1 micro gram MK-801, indicates a supra-additive interaction. Each point represents the mean %MPE with SEM in five or six rats.
Figure 2. Log dose-response curves for reduction in tactile hyperesthesia produced by intrathecal injection of clonidine alone, MK-801 alone, and clonidine combined with a fixed dose (1 micro gram) of MK-801 (CLON*). Doses above 20 micro gram MK were not carried out because of motor weakness. The left shift of ED50for CLON* than the ED50for CLON, even though added the effect for 1 micro gram MK-801, indicates a supra-additive interaction. Each point represents the mean %MPE with SEM in five or six rats.
Figure 2. Log dose-response curves for reduction in tactile hyperesthesia produced by intrathecal injection of clonidine alone, MK-801 alone, and clonidine combined with a fixed dose (1 micro gram) of MK-801 (CLON*). Doses above 20 micro gram MK were not carried out because of motor weakness. The left shift of ED50for CLON* than the ED50for CLON, even though added the effect for 1 micro gram MK-801, indicates a supra-additive interaction. Each point represents the mean %MPE with SEM in five or six rats.
×
Table 1. ED50(micro gram) and Slope with 95% CI for Dose-Response Curve of Intrathecal Agents
Image not available
Table 1. ED50(micro gram) and Slope with 95% CI for Dose-Response Curve of Intrathecal Agents
×
Drug Interaction
The log dose-response curve of clonidine mixed with the fixed dose of MK-801 was shifted to the left as compared to that of clonidine without MK-801. The ED50value of clonidine joined with 1 micro gram MK-801 was less than that of the ED50of clonidine alone as calculated when the %MPE value of 1 micro gram (6%) MK-801 was added (Figure 2).
Dose response curves were generated with the two drugs being given in the fixed fraction of the dose ratio 1:1. The intrathecal administration of the combination doses resulted in a dose-dependent increase in the mechanical pain threshold. The isobolographic analysis indicated that there was no overlap between the confidence intervals of the experimentally determined combination ED50and the theoretic line of additivity, showing that the drug interaction is synergistic (Figure 3). The dose-sparing ratio (the sum the ratios of the ED50values for MK-801 and clonidine determined alone and jointly) was calculated to be 0.46.
Figure 3. Isobolographic plot for the interaction between intrathecal clonidine (CLON) and MK-801 (MK). The ED50values for each agent are plotted on the Y and X axis, respectively, and the thick lines present the SEM of the ED50. The dotted line connecting these two points is the theoretical line of additivity. The theoretical additive ED50point (A) is calculated from the ED50values and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each agent. The experimental ED50point (B) for the combinations lies within the space defined by the theoretical line of additivity. The confidence intervals do not overlap, indicating a supra-additive interaction.
Figure 3. Isobolographic plot for the interaction between intrathecal clonidine (CLON) and MK-801 (MK). The ED50values for each agent are plotted on the Y and X axis, respectively, and the thick lines present the SEM of the ED50. The dotted line connecting these two points is the theoretical line of additivity. The theoretical additive ED50point (A) is calculated from the ED50values and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each agent. The experimental ED50point (B) for the combinations lies within the space defined by the theoretical line of additivity. The confidence intervals do not overlap, indicating a supra-additive interaction.
Figure 3. Isobolographic plot for the interaction between intrathecal clonidine (CLON) and MK-801 (MK). The ED50values for each agent are plotted on the Y and X axis, respectively, and the thick lines present the SEM of the ED50. The dotted line connecting these two points is the theoretical line of additivity. The theoretical additive ED50point (A) is calculated from the ED50values and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each agent. The experimental ED50point (B) for the combinations lies within the space defined by the theoretical line of additivity. The confidence intervals do not overlap, indicating a supra-additive interaction.
×
alpha sub 2 Antagonist
The intrathecal delivery of atipamezole had no effect on the antihyperesthesia effects of approximately equiactive doses of intrathecal MK-801 but significantly attenuated the effect of clonidine alone and clonidine given together with MK-801 (P < 0.05;Figure 4).
Figure 4. The alpha2-antagonistic effect of atipamezole given intrathecally 10 min before administration of clonidine (CLON), MK-801 (MK), mixture of clonidine and MK-801 (CLON + MK), or their vehicle (SALINE). Each column represents the mean %MPE and SEM. * Statistically significant different from the effect of agent without atipamezole (P < 0.05).
Figure 4. The alpha2-antagonistic effect of atipamezole given intrathecally 10 min before administration of clonidine (CLON), MK-801 (MK), mixture of clonidine and MK-801 (CLON + MK), or their vehicle (SALINE). Each column represents the mean %MPE and SEM. * Statistically significant different from the effect of agent without atipamezole (P < 0.05).
Figure 4. The alpha2-antagonistic effect of atipamezole given intrathecally 10 min before administration of clonidine (CLON), MK-801 (MK), mixture of clonidine and MK-801 (CLON + MK), or their vehicle (SALINE). Each column represents the mean %MPE and SEM. * Statistically significant different from the effect of agent without atipamezole (P < 0.05).
×
Side Effects
Spinal injection of clonidine resulted in a dose-dependent incidence of sedation with exophthalmus and significant urinary voiding. Prominent sedation was observed at 20 micro gram.
Detectable flaccidity with MK-801 was not observed until an injection of 20 micro gram. All rats became too weak to walk and could not respond to von Frey hair application at the dose of 30 micro gram, limiting the highest dose that could be used of this agent. All of the weakness, even that produced by the highest dose, was resolved by 24 h. Side effects were considerably less severe after equiactive doses in the combination group (Table 2).
Table 2. Summary of Incidence of Side Effects after Intrathecal Clonidine, MK-801, and Clonidine and MK-801 Together
Image not available
Table 2. Summary of Incidence of Side Effects after Intrathecal Clonidine, MK-801, and Clonidine and MK-801 Together
×
Discussion
Hyperesthesia
Tactile allodynia, which is partly dependent on sympathetic activity for its manifestation, is a conspicuous component of the post-nerve injury pain state [22 ] in humans. Such pain states often are found to show minimal sensitivity to systemically or spinally delivered opiates. [23,24 ] The ligation of the L5-L6 nerve root in the rat, as described by Kim and Chung, [16 ] results in a syndrome with particular similarities to the human clinical pain state: a clear escape response is evoked by a low-intensity tactile stimulus [18 ]; the hyperpathia and thermal hyperalgesia are reversed by sympathectomy, [2 ] and spinal opiates have only modest effects on the tactile hyperesthesia.* As reviewed in the introduction, laboratory studies employing such models have emphasized the role of anomalous sprouting of large myelinated afferents into the dorsal horn, [3 ] possible loss of dorsal horn interneurons, and the sprouting of sympathetic terminals in the dorsal root ganglion of the injured nerve along with the development of a local sensitivity to sympathetic input. [4 ].
The observation that intrathecal clonidine* and NMDA receptor antagonists [13 ] can ameliorate this pain state in animal models of tactile hyperesthesia is important in that it implicates a role for these several receptor systems in regulating this pain state and suggests their likely importance in the behaviorally similar states observed in humans. Reports have indicated that epidural clonidine can diminish neuropathic symptoms in RSD pain states, [7 ] whereas an intrathecal NMDA antagonist was shown to diminish the hyperesthetic component resulting from repetitive tactile stimulation in a nerve-injured patient. [25 ].
Clonidine
Spinal alpha2agonists can alter pain transmission by acting presynaptically on C fibers to reduce transmitter release, as well as acting postsynaptically to hyperpolarize dorsal horn nociceptors. [26 ] However, this does not appear to be the explanation for the actions of spinal alpha2agents. Such an alternative would suggest that spinal opioids would be equally efficacious only if they act on the same synapses in this model, but they are not. Although other alternatives exist, it appears likely that the antihyperesthetic action reflects on the sympathetic dependency of this model and the ability of spinal alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists to inhibit sympathetic outflow. [27 ] Thus, intrathecal alpha2agonists reduce sympathetic output and decrease blood pressure by a direct effect on spinal sympathetic preganglionic neurons. [5 ] Studies have shown that the antihyperesthesia effects are mediated at the level of the thoracolumbar spinal cord.
MK-801
With regard to MK-801, this agent exerts a well known action as a noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist. [28 ] Its actions in this model are not likely due to a direct blockade of afferent input. Previous studies have emphasized that the NMDA receptor is not post-synaptic to the primary afferent but is postsynaptic to an interneuron that is responsible for the evocation of a facilitated state of afferent processing, as manifested in the discharge of dorsal horn wide dynamic range neuron. [29 ] These observations are consistent with several lines of observations suggesting that these states are mediated by the spinal release of glutamate. Thus, the spinal delivery of NMDA will enhance the response of dorsal horn neurons to low-threshold mechanical stimuli [30 ] and evoke a state of exaggerated responses to low-threshold tactile stimuli (e.g., tactile allodynia**). Conversely, in several models, it has been shown that NMDA antagonists are able to attenuate the facilitated component of the pain state. [15,31,32 ] Moreover, in models in which tactile hyperesthesia can be induced, i.e., after the spinal delivery of strychnine, [12 ] and in the Chung model of neuropathy, [13 ] spinal NMDA antagonists are able to attenuate significantly the tactile hyperesthesia. This supports the evolution of a role for NMDA receptors in the miscoding of the sensory message in the absence of glycine inhibition or with the dorsal horn reorganization associated with peripheral nerve injury. Alternatively, it should be noted that NMDA antagonist may reduce excitatory input on IML neurons and attenuate sympathetic output. [33–35 ] It is thus possible that a component of its actions also relates to a reduction in sympathetic outflow. However, NMDA antagonists, unlike alpha2agonists, can exert antihyperesthesia effects by the mechanisms that do not likely involve sympathetic dependency (e.g., as after the acute delivery of intrathecal strychnine). [12 ].
Synergy
A variety of drug classes have been shown to be associated with a synergistic interaction, as reflected by their analgesic activity. [19 ] It is possible that the augmented activity resulted from a decreased clearance. Although not examined in this study, we previously showed that spinal alpha2agonists do not alter the spinal clearance of other spinal agents, such as morphine. [36 ] Moreover, there was no apparent decrease in the time of peak effect or increase in the duration of action, as might be anticipated if the mechanisms of enhancement were related to a simple change in clearance. Alternatively, the two agents may have acted to augment the affinity of the other agent for its receptor. Although there are no binding data to refute such synergy, we note that the side effects of either agent were not enhanced. Were there to be a receptor interaction, we would anticipate that the appearance of sedation and urination (with clonidine) or the motor weakness (with MK-801) would have been similarly enhanced. Failure to see such enhancement likely would exclude a facilitation of the receptor interaction. We thus conclude that the augmentation likely reflects the nature of the interaction between the hypothesized reduction in sympathetic outflow and the role played by NMDA receptors in the dorsal horn after peripheral nerve lesion. We can only speculate that, to the degree that the acute reduction in sympathetic outflow reduces the component that evokes a state of facilitated processing, the level of glutamatergic tone activating the segmental NMDA receptor is correspondingly reduced and the levels of NMDA antagonists to “normalize” the pain state are significantly diminished. This positive interaction, predicated on the distinct spinal mechanisms by which these two classes of agents act, may possess clinical significance in the management of pain states with a sympathetic dependency.
*Yaksh TL, Pogret JM, Lee Y.W., Chaplan SR: Reversal of nerve ligation-induced allodynia by spinal alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther (submitted).
**Chaplan, Bach: Unpublished observations.
REFERENCES
Schwartzman RJ: Reflex sympathetic dystrophy and causalgia. Neurol Clin 10:953-973, 1992.
Kim SH, Na HS, Sheen K, Chung JM: Effects sympathectomy on a rat model of peripheral neuropathy. Pain 55:85-92, 1993.
Woolf CJ, Shortland P, Coggeshall RE: Peripheral nerve injury triggers central sprouting of myelinated afferents. Nature 355:75-78, 1992.
Mclachlan EM, Janig W, Devor M. Michaelis M: Peripheral nerve injury triggers noradrenergic sprouting within dorsal root ganglia Nature 363:543-546, 1993.
Eisenach JC, Tong C: Site of hemodynamic effects of intrathecal alpha sup 2 -adrenergic agonists. ANESTHESIOLOGY 74:766-771, 1991.
McQuay HJ: Pharmacological treatment of neuralgic and neuropathic pain, Cancer Surv 7:141-159, 1988.
Rauck RL, Eisenach JC, Jackson K. Young LD, Southern J: Epidural clonidine treatment for refractory reflex sympathetic dystrophy. ANESTHESIOLOGY 79:1163-1169, 1993.
Kajander KC, Wakisaka S, Bennett GJ: Spontaneous discharge originates in the dorsal root ganglion at the onset of a painful peripheral neuropathy in the rat. Neurosci Lett 138:225-228, 1992.
Todd AJ, Sullivan AC; Light microscope study of the coexistence of GABA-like and glycine-like immunoreactivities in the spinal cord of the rat. J Comp Neurol 296:496-505, 1990.
Mao J, Price DD, Mayer DJ, Lu J, Hayes RL: Intrathecal MK-801 and local nerve anesthesia synergistically reduce nociceptive behaviors in rats with experimental peripheral mononeuropathy. Brain Res 576:254-262, 1992.
Yaksh TL, Yamamoto T, Myers RR: Pharmacology of nerve compression-evoked hyperesthesia, Hyperalgesia and Allodynia. Edited by Willis WD, New York, Raven, 1992, pp 245-258.
Yaksh TL: Behavioral and autonomic correlates of the tactile evoked allodynia produced by spinal glycine inhibition: Effects of modulatory receptor systems and excitatory amino acid antagonists. Pain 37:111-123, 1989.
Chaplan SR, Yaksh TL: Intrathecal dextrorphan suppresses allodynia in a rat surgical neuropathy model by a spinal mechanism (abstract. ANESTHESIOLOGY 79:A810, 1993.
Eisenach JC, Dewan DM, Rose JC, Angelo JM: Epidural clonidine produces antinociception, but not hypotension, in sheep. ANESTHESIOLOGY 66:496-501, 1987.
Ren K, Hylden JI, K, Williams GM, Ruda MA, Dubner R: The effects of a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, MK-801, on behavioral hyperalgesia and dorsal horn neuronal activity in rats with unilateral inflammation. Pain 50:331-344, 1992.
Kim SH, Chung JM: An experimental model for peripheral neuropathy produced by segmental spinal nerve ligation in the rat. Pain 50:355-363, 1992.
Yaksh TL, Rudy TA: Chronic catheterization of the spinal subarachnoid space. Physiol Biochem Behav 17:1031-1036, 1976.
Chaplan SR, Bach FW, Pogrel JW, Chung JM, Yaksh TL: Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia evoked by unilateral ligation of the fifth and sixth lumbar nerves in the rat. J Neurosci Methods (in press).
Malmberg AB, Yaksh TL: Isobolographic and dose response analysis of the interaction between intrathecal mu and delta agonists: Effects of naltrindole and its benzofuran analog (NTB). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 263:264-275, 1992.
Tallarida RJ, Porreca F. Cowan A: Statistical analysis of drug-drug and site-site interactions with isobolograms Life Sci 45:947-961, 1989.
Tallarida RJ: Manual of Pharmacological Calculation with Computer Programs. New York, Springer, 1987, pp 11-18.
Drummond PD, Finch PM, A SG: Reflex sympathetic dystrophy: the significance of differing plasma catecholamine concentrations in affected and unaffected limbs. Brain 114:2025-2036, 1991.
Arner S, Meyerson BA: Lack of analgesic effect of opioids on neuropathic and idiopathic forms of pain. Pain 33:11-23, 1988.
Puke MJC, Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z: The differential effects of morphine and the alpha sub 2 -adrenoceptor agonists clonidine and dexmedetomidine on the prevention and treatment of experimental neuropathic pain. Anesth Analg 77:104-109, 1993.
Kristensen JD, Svensson B, Gordh T: The NMDA-receptor antagonist CPP abolishes neurogenic ‘wind-up pain’ after intrathecal administration in humans. Pain 51:249-253, 1992.
Pertovaara A, Antinociception induced by alpha -2 -adrenoceptor agonists, with special emphasis on medetomidine studies Prog Neurobiol 40:691-709, 1993.
Yasuoka S, Yaksh TL: Effects on nociceptive threshold and blood pressure of intrathecally administered morphine and alpha-adrenergic agonists. Neuropharmacology 22:309-315, 1983.
Woodruff GN, Foster AC, Gill R, Kemp JA, Wong EHF. Iversen LL: The interaction between MK-801 and receptors for N-methyl-D-aspartate: functional consequences. Neuropharmacology 26:903-909, 1987.
Yaksh TL: The spinal pharmacology of facilitation of afferent processing evoked by high-threshold afferent input of the postinjury pain state. Curr Opin Neurol 6:250-256, 1993.
Dougherty PM, Palecek J. Paleckova V, Sorkin LS, Willis WD: The role of NMDA and non-NMDA excitatory amino acid receptors in the excitation of primate spinothalamic tract neurons by mechanical, chemical, thermal, and electrical stimuli. J Neurosci 12:3025-3041, 1992.
Davar G, Hama A, Deykin A, Vos B, Maciewicz R: MK-801 blocks the development of thermal hyperalgesia in a rat model of experimental painful neuropathy. Brain Res 424:402-406, 1991.
Seltzer Z, Cohn S, Ginzburg R, Beilin B: Modulation of neuropathic pain behavior in rats by spinal disinhibition and NMDA receptor blockade of injury discharge. Pain 45:69-75, 1991.
Shen E, Mo N, Dun NJ: APV-sensitive dorsal root afferent transmission to neonate rat sympathetic preganglionic neurons in vitro. J Neurophysiol 64:991-999, 1990.
Bazil MK, Gordon FJ: Effect of blockade of spinal NMDA receptors on sympathoexcitation and cardiovascular responses produced by cerebral ischemia. Brain Res 555:149-152, 1991.
Hong Y, Henry JL: Glutamate, NMDA and NMDA receptor antagonists: cardiovascular effects of intrathecal administration in the rat. Brain Res 569:38-45, 1992.
Monasky MS, Zinsmeister AR, Stevens CW, Yaksh TL: Interaction of intrathecal morphine and ST-91 on antinociception in the rat: Dose response analysis, antagonism and clearance. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 254:383-392, 1990.
Figure 1. Time-dependent reduction in tactile hyperesthesia (expressed as %MPE) produced by intrathecal injection of clonidine (CLON; top), MK-801 (MK; middle), and clonidine combined with MK-801 (CLON + MK; bottom) given in the doses indicated. Each line represents the mean %MPE with SEM bars in five or six rats.
Figure 1. Time-dependent reduction in tactile hyperesthesia (expressed as %MPE) produced by intrathecal injection of clonidine (CLON; top), MK-801 (MK; middle), and clonidine combined with MK-801 (CLON + MK; bottom) given in the doses indicated. Each line represents the mean %MPE with SEM bars in five or six rats.
Figure 1. Time-dependent reduction in tactile hyperesthesia (expressed as %MPE) produced by intrathecal injection of clonidine (CLON; top), MK-801 (MK; middle), and clonidine combined with MK-801 (CLON + MK; bottom) given in the doses indicated. Each line represents the mean %MPE with SEM bars in five or six rats.
×
Figure 2. Log dose-response curves for reduction in tactile hyperesthesia produced by intrathecal injection of clonidine alone, MK-801 alone, and clonidine combined with a fixed dose (1 micro gram) of MK-801 (CLON*). Doses above 20 micro gram MK were not carried out because of motor weakness. The left shift of ED50for CLON* than the ED50for CLON, even though added the effect for 1 micro gram MK-801, indicates a supra-additive interaction. Each point represents the mean %MPE with SEM in five or six rats.
Figure 2. Log dose-response curves for reduction in tactile hyperesthesia produced by intrathecal injection of clonidine alone, MK-801 alone, and clonidine combined with a fixed dose (1 micro gram) of MK-801 (CLON*). Doses above 20 micro gram MK were not carried out because of motor weakness. The left shift of ED50for CLON* than the ED50for CLON, even though added the effect for 1 micro gram MK-801, indicates a supra-additive interaction. Each point represents the mean %MPE with SEM in five or six rats.
Figure 2. Log dose-response curves for reduction in tactile hyperesthesia produced by intrathecal injection of clonidine alone, MK-801 alone, and clonidine combined with a fixed dose (1 micro gram) of MK-801 (CLON*). Doses above 20 micro gram MK were not carried out because of motor weakness. The left shift of ED50for CLON* than the ED50for CLON, even though added the effect for 1 micro gram MK-801, indicates a supra-additive interaction. Each point represents the mean %MPE with SEM in five or six rats.
×
Figure 3. Isobolographic plot for the interaction between intrathecal clonidine (CLON) and MK-801 (MK). The ED50values for each agent are plotted on the Y and X axis, respectively, and the thick lines present the SEM of the ED50. The dotted line connecting these two points is the theoretical line of additivity. The theoretical additive ED50point (A) is calculated from the ED50values and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each agent. The experimental ED50point (B) for the combinations lies within the space defined by the theoretical line of additivity. The confidence intervals do not overlap, indicating a supra-additive interaction.
Figure 3. Isobolographic plot for the interaction between intrathecal clonidine (CLON) and MK-801 (MK). The ED50values for each agent are plotted on the Y and X axis, respectively, and the thick lines present the SEM of the ED50. The dotted line connecting these two points is the theoretical line of additivity. The theoretical additive ED50point (A) is calculated from the ED50values and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each agent. The experimental ED50point (B) for the combinations lies within the space defined by the theoretical line of additivity. The confidence intervals do not overlap, indicating a supra-additive interaction.
Figure 3. Isobolographic plot for the interaction between intrathecal clonidine (CLON) and MK-801 (MK). The ED50values for each agent are plotted on the Y and X axis, respectively, and the thick lines present the SEM of the ED50. The dotted line connecting these two points is the theoretical line of additivity. The theoretical additive ED50point (A) is calculated from the ED50values and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each agent. The experimental ED50point (B) for the combinations lies within the space defined by the theoretical line of additivity. The confidence intervals do not overlap, indicating a supra-additive interaction.
×
Figure 4. The alpha2-antagonistic effect of atipamezole given intrathecally 10 min before administration of clonidine (CLON), MK-801 (MK), mixture of clonidine and MK-801 (CLON + MK), or their vehicle (SALINE). Each column represents the mean %MPE and SEM. * Statistically significant different from the effect of agent without atipamezole (P < 0.05).
Figure 4. The alpha2-antagonistic effect of atipamezole given intrathecally 10 min before administration of clonidine (CLON), MK-801 (MK), mixture of clonidine and MK-801 (CLON + MK), or their vehicle (SALINE). Each column represents the mean %MPE and SEM. * Statistically significant different from the effect of agent without atipamezole (P < 0.05).
Figure 4. The alpha2-antagonistic effect of atipamezole given intrathecally 10 min before administration of clonidine (CLON), MK-801 (MK), mixture of clonidine and MK-801 (CLON + MK), or their vehicle (SALINE). Each column represents the mean %MPE and SEM. * Statistically significant different from the effect of agent without atipamezole (P < 0.05).
×
Table 1. ED50(micro gram) and Slope with 95% CI for Dose-Response Curve of Intrathecal Agents
Image not available
Table 1. ED50(micro gram) and Slope with 95% CI for Dose-Response Curve of Intrathecal Agents
×
Table 2. Summary of Incidence of Side Effects after Intrathecal Clonidine, MK-801, and Clonidine and MK-801 Together
Image not available
Table 2. Summary of Incidence of Side Effects after Intrathecal Clonidine, MK-801, and Clonidine and MK-801 Together
×