Free
Clinical Science  |   May 1996
Parental Presence during Induction of Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Author Notes
  • (Kain) Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology and Pediatrics.
  • (Mayes) Arnold Gesell Associate Professor of Child Development, Pediatrics and Psychology.
  • (Caramico) Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology.
  • (Silver) Director of Statistical Computing, Children's Clinical Research Center.
  • (Spieker) Fellow.
  • (Nygren) Research Associate.
  • (Anderson) Research Scientist.
  • (Rimar) Associate Professor of Anesthesiology and Pediatrics.
  • Received from the Department of Anesthesiology; Yale Child Study Center; and Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. Submitted for publication June 29, 1995. Accepted for publication January 1, 1996. Supported by the Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research (Rochester, MN) with a grant award provided by the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia (Park Ridge, IL).
  • Address reprint requests to Dr. Kain: Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06510.
Article Information
Clinical Science
Clinical Science   |   May 1996
Parental Presence during Induction of Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Anesthesiology 5 1996, Vol.84, 1060-1067. doi:
Anesthesiology 5 1996, Vol.84, 1060-1067. doi:
Key words: Anesthesia, pediatric: general; induction. parental presence.
PARENTAL presence during induction of general anesthesia is controversial. Although early studies suggest reduced patient anxiety and increased cooperation, [1,2] more recent reports indicate that parental presence may not always be beneficial. [3,4] Potential benefits include minimizing the need for premedication and avoiding distress on separation from the parents. Other benefits such as reducing the child's anxiety during induction or affecting long-term behavior after surgery also remain unproved. Behavioral studies in children undergoing surgery are extremely difficult to design and perform. Anxiety and behavioral responses resulting from induction of anesthesia have a complex and multifactorial origin. The child, the parent, and the anesthesiologist must be evaluated simultaneously to understand the many factors influencing anxiety during induction of anesthesia.
The purpose of this investigation, therefore, was to study these relationships and to determine if parental presence during the induction of anesthesia reduces the immediate anxiety of the child and results in a lower incidence of adverse long-term behavioral sequelae. In addition, this study examines factors that may predict which pairs of children and parents wild benefit most from parental presence during induction.
Materials and Methods
In this randomized controlled trial, the study population consisted of 84 children aged 1-6 yr who were randomly assigned to parent-absent (control) or parent-present (intervention) groups. All subjects (ASA physical status 1 or 2) underwent elective outpatient surgery and general anesthesia at the Children's Hospital at Yale-New Haven. To avoid potential confounding variables, any history of previous surgery, hospitalization, chronic illness, or developmental delay excluded subjects from participation in this study. All inductions were performed in an induction room at the same time of day (morning) with the parents dressed in their own clothing. Premedication was not administrated to any subject and all inductions were performed by a single attending anesthesiologist. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and written informed consent was obtained from the parents.
Behavioral and Physiologic Assessments
Data regarding the following behavioral assessment tools are elucidated in the Appendix.
- E-A-S-I (Emotionality, Activity, Sociability, Impulsivity) Instrument of child temperament [5] .
- Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (YPAS) [6] .
- Post Hospitalization Behavior Questionnaire (PHBQ) [7] .
- Clinical Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS) [8,9] .
- State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)**
- Anxiety Visual Analog Scale (VAS) [10,11] .
A total of six behavioral tools were used, the parents completed four tools, the STAI, EASI, VAS, and PHBQ; trained observers completed three tools, the VAS, YPAS, and the CARS. A developmentalist, a psychologist, and an anesthesiologist served as observers and administered the various observational assessments. Interobserver agreements among these three observers were measured in a previous investigation [6]; for a sample of 58 preschool children the agreement ranged from 0.66 to 0.98 for the YPAS, VAS, and the CARS.
Cortisol analysis was done as follows: after obtaining the subjects' blood each sample was transferred immediately into a precooled tube containing heparin. After gentle mixing, the blood was centrifuged at 4,000 RPM for 2 min and the plasma stored at -70 degrees C. Plasma cortisol concentration was determined in duplicate using radioimmunoassay kits from Diagnostic System Laboratories (Webster, TX). Samples were determined in a single large batch, duplicates agreed within 15%, and quality assessment samples were well within the manufacturer's defined range.
Study Protocol
All subjects were recruited 1 week before surgery while the children were undergoing a behavioral preoperative preparation program. The program consists of providing information to the child and parent, an orientation tour of the operating room and postanesthesia care unit and modeling using dolls by child-life specialists as related to the specific surgery planned for the child. This is done on an individual basis and was modified based on the age of the child. After recruitment, demographic data including birth order, number of siblings, parental education, temperament of the child (EASI), behavior of the child in previous medical encounters (VAS), and trait anxiety of the parent (STAI) were obtained (Figure 1). Also, baseline heart rate and blood pressure were measured in all parents of subjects.
Figure 1. Time line of trial. Measures include EASI (Emotionality, Activity, Sociability, Impulsivity Instrument), STAI (State Trait Anxiety Inventory), VAS (Visual Analog Scale), HR (heart rate), BP (blood pressure), YPAS (Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale), CARS (Clinical Anxiety Rating Scale), and PHBQ (Post Hospitalization Behavior Questionnaire). Subjects measured at different times across the trial included the child (C), parent (P), and the anesthesiologist (A).
Figure 1. Time line of trial. Measures include EASI (Emotionality, Activity, Sociability, Impulsivity Instrument), STAI (State Trait Anxiety Inventory), VAS (Visual Analog Scale), HR (heart rate), BP (blood pressure), YPAS (Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale), CARS (Clinical Anxiety Rating Scale), and PHBQ (Post Hospitalization Behavior Questionnaire). Subjects measured at different times across the trial included the child (C), parent (P), and the anesthesiologist (A).
Figure 1. Time line of trial. Measures include EASI (Emotionality, Activity, Sociability, Impulsivity Instrument), STAI (State Trait Anxiety Inventory), VAS (Visual Analog Scale), HR (heart rate), BP (blood pressure), YPAS (Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale), CARS (Clinical Anxiety Rating Scale), and PHBQ (Post Hospitalization Behavior Questionnaire). Subjects measured at different times across the trial included the child (C), parent (P), and the anesthesiologist (A).
×
Day of Surgery, Preoperative Holding Area. The anxiety of both the child and parent were rated by an independent "blinded observer" using the VAS. Parents also were asked to rate their subjective levels of anxiety using a self-report VAS. Next, subjects were randomly assigned to a parent-absent group (control) or a parent-present group (intervention). The randomization was done using a computer-generated random numbers table.
Day of Surgery, Induction Room. Anesthesia was induced using oxygen/nitrous oxide and halothane administered via a scented mask. All inductions were videotaped to facilitate later independent assessments of the observational scales. Child's anxiety (YPAS, CARS) and cooperation (VAS), during induction were assessed using the videotapes by three independent observers (e.g., each observer rated the videotapes using one behavioral measure only). The rating was done at two points: (1) on entrance to the induction room, and (2) during introduction of the anesthesia mask to the child. As soon as anesthesia was induced, the parents were accompanied to the waiting area and asked to rate their situational anxiety (STAI) level and an investigator measured their blood pressure and heart rate. Similarly, the attending anesthesiologist's blood pressure and heart rate were recorded. Immediately after the insertion of an intravenous cannula, a 2-ml sample of blood was withdrawn from each subject for serum cortisol analysis. Adverse effects, such as laryngospasm were noted and duration of induction was recorded (for the purpose of this study, the duration of induction was defined as the time from entering the room until loss of consciousness occurred). After the induction, the anesthesiologist was asked to rate his own situational anxiety (STAI) level and to complete a questionnaire rating the helpfulness of the parents.
Day of Surgery, Recovery Room. Incidence of adverse effects, time to discharge, sedative requirements, time to first voiding and amount of fluid intake was recorded. Parents also were asked to rate their helpfulness to the child during induction and their satisfaction with nursing, anesthesia, and surgical staff. The rating was done using a VAS scale that ranged from "not satisfied" (score of 0) to "extremely satisfied" (score of 100).
Two Weeks and Six Months after the Operation. The parent completed the PHBQ and returned it by mail. At 2 weeks after surgery, completed questionnaires were received from 78 subjects (92.8%) after three mailings. At 6 months, the response rate was 73.8% (62 of 84) after three mailings. To assess the "nonresponse bias," a sample of 33.3% (2 of 6) of parents who did not respond at 2 weeks and 22.7% (5 of 22) of parents who did not respond at 6 months were contacted by telephone and a PHBQ interview was conducted to ensure the validity of the results. The nonresponse PHBQ interview for 2 weeks and 6 months indicated that the nonresponders did not differ significantly from the responders either in the prevalence of behavioral changes or in the types of behavioral changes. Also, demographics of nonresponders was similar to that of the responders.
Statistical Analysis
The sample size was based on a preliminary investigation [6] and was calculated based on the YPAS anxiety score (61.8+/-21.8) of children with their parents absent. A 20% difference in the anxiety level (i.e., 49.5+/-17.5) between the intervention and control groups was considered clinically significant. A sample size of 42 subjects in each group was sufficient to detect a 20% difference in anxiety level with a power of 0.8 and an alpha of 0.05. Descriptive statistics provide an overview of the relationships between the child/parent/anesthesiologist variables, and the anxiety level of the child. Normal data are presented as mean+/-SD; skewed data as median and interquartile range (25%-75%). Differences between groups are examined using inferential statistics, including t tests (for an overall perspective on the likeness of intervention and control), Mann-Whitney U tests (i.e., for the case of skewed data), stepwise multiple regression (to determine which of the variables deemed relevant by the literature prove predictive based on our data), and analysis of variance with Tukey's procedure for multiple comparisons (to localize the effect when interactions were identified in the stepwise regression model).
To better understand whether certain children benefit from parental presence, we developed a stepwise multiple regression model to test for interaction effects between parental presence and several possible predictors of anxiety. The predictors that were considered included variables suggested in the literature and some acquired in our practice to affect the response of the child to parental presence during induction of anesthesia. After eliminating the statistically insignificant variables from the stepwise regression, we were left with three significant interactions. To localize the effects, we performed three two-factor analyses of variance with Tukey's procedure, [12] using the child's anxiety (cortisol concentration) as the outcome, and parental presence as one factor. Owing to multiplicity of comparisons, significance was accepted at the 0.016 level for the analyses of variance. The post hoc Tukey's test has a correction built in to the algorithm to account for multiple comparisons.
Results
Demographics and Univariate Analysis
Eighty-four subjects were entered into this study. There were no significant differences between the control (parent-absent) and intervention (parent-present) groups regarding demographics such as age or baseline temperament of the child or parent (Table 1). When the control group was compared to the intervention group there were no significant differences in any of the behavioral or physiologic measures tested in the holding area and during induction of anesthesia (Table 2). A detailed analysis for each one of the five YPAS anxiety categories failed to demonstrate any difference between the two groups. The cooperation of the control group and the intervention group as measured by a VAS also was similar (85 [67-91] vs. 89 [73-92], P = NS). All behavioral and physiologic anxiety ratings for the parents and the anesthesiologist in the preoperative holding area and during induction were likewise similar between the two groups (Table 3). The length of induction did not differ between the two groups (2.6+/-1.2 min vs. 2.8+/-0.9, p = NS). No anesthetic complications such as laryngospasm occurred during any of the inductions and no parent demonstrated disruptive behavior or refused to leave the induction suite. In the recovery room, incidence of nausea and vomiting (23% vs. 22%, P = NS), analgesic use (21% vs. 23%, P = NS), and time to discharge (62+/-14 min vs. 67+/-11, P = NS) was similar for the two groups. Finally, the PHBQ score 2 weeks after surgery (83+/-4 control vs. 83+/-7 intervention, P = NS), and 6 months after surgery (82+/-4 control vs. 83 +/-10 intervention, P = NS) also was similar between the two groups.
Table 1. Demographic and Baseline Characteristics
Image not available
Table 1. Demographic and Baseline Characteristics
×
Table 2. Behavioral and Physiologic Anxiety Scores among the Children
Image not available
Table 2. Behavioral and Physiologic Anxiety Scores among the Children
×
Table 3. Selected Behavioral and Physiologic Anxiety Scores among the Parents and the Anesthesiologist of the Study Subjects
Image not available
Table 3. Selected Behavioral and Physiologic Anxiety Scores among the Parents and the Anesthesiologist of the Study Subjects
×
Predicting the Response to Parental Presence
To better understand whether certain children benefit from parental presence during induction, we developed a stepwise regression model to test for interaction effects between parental presence and several possible predictors of anxiety. The predictors that were considered included variables suggested in the literature and acquired in our clinical practice to affect the response of the child to parental presence during induction of anesthesia. Such variables include age and temperament of child, anxiety of the child at previous medical encounters and in the preoperative holding area, baseline and situational anxiety level of the parent in the preoperative holding area and during induction, and situational anxiety level of the anesthesiologist. Also, demographics such as socioeconomic status of the parent, birth order, number of siblings, enrollment in day care, and experience of the parents with previous anesthetics were considered.
After extraneous variables were eliminated from the model with child's serum cortisol concentration as the outcome, interactions were identified between parental presence and each of the following three predictors: child's age (T = -4.07, P = 0.001, R2= 0.23), baseline anxiety level of the parent (T = 3.04, P = 0.004, R2= 0.18), and baseline temperament (EASI-activity; T = 2.54, P = 0.014, R2= 0.15). The three interactions had a multiple R2of 0.41 (F = 3.7, P = 0.004). Analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc procedure was then used to localize the effect in these three cases. Results of these analyses demonstrated that serum cortisol concentration was lower in the presence of their parents for children who had a parent with low trait anxiety (lower 25% of the STAI; 71+/-8 micro gram/ml vs. 116+/- 18 micro gram/ml, adjusted Tukey's P = 0.02), or children who had a low baseline level of activity (lower 25% of the EASI-activity; 69+/- 7 micro gram/ml vs. 105+/-14 micro gram/ml, adjusted Tukey's P = 0.05). Similarly, children older than 4 yr age had lower serum cortisol concentration in the presence of their parents during induction (70 +/-5 micro gram/ml vs. 131+/-22 micro gram/ml, adjusted Tukey's P = 0.001). In contrast, there was a trend in children younger than 4 yr toward having higher serum cortisol concentrations if their parent was present (96+/-32 micro gram/ml vs. 77+/-26 micro gram/ml; unadjusted P = 0.049, adjusted Tukey's P = 0.42).
Opinions about Parental Presence
The parents and the anesthesiologist expressed different opinions about how helpful the parents were during the induction. While most parents thought their presence made the anesthesiologist's job easier (68%), the anesthesiologist believed this to be the case only 31% of the time. Similarly, while most (90%) parents rated themselves as being helpful to their child, the anesthesiologist rated only a minority as being helpful (12%). The overwhelming majority of parents (98%) present during induction indicated that if their child needed surgery again, they would like to be present during the induction. Parent's satisfaction with the anesthesiologist (80+/-41 control vs. 88+/-34 intervention), nursing (87+/-34 vs. 90+/-30), and overall preoperative care (91+/-31 vs. 90+/-33) did not differ between the intervention and control groups.
Discussion
This study demonstrates that only children who were older than 4 yr, had a parent with a low trait anxiety level or a low baseline level of activity as assessed by temperament ratings benefited from parental presence during induction of anesthesia. In contrast, there was a trend among children younger than 4 yr to be more anxious during induction in the presence of their parent. We also have demonstrated that routine parental presence during induction of anesthesia can occur without affecting the length or the safety of the induction.
We found that children with low baseline activity, as measured by the EASI Temperament Scale, were less anxious with their parent present during induction of anesthesia. Baseline temperament characteristics can be used to predict how a child will respond emotionally in a stressful situation, for example, children who are shy or inhibited tend to become anxious in novel settings with an adrenocortical response and elevated heart rate as biologic correlates. [13] Kagan et al. found that inhibited children with consistently high cortisol levels exhibited somatic and behavioral signs associated with anxiety states, including gastrointestinal distress, nightmares, and separation fears. [13] Although there are few studies examining the link between these temperament traits and anxiety in children, it may be that children who are more anxious, shy, or inhibited are more vulnerable to stressful events, so having a parent present during induction of anesthesia provides emotional support or stability for this type of child.
The younger child does not necessarily have the cognitive capacity to anticipate potential dangers or painful situations during the induction, whereas the older child may anticipate pain and the fear of "going to sleep." Older children may rely on a number of coping strategies including verbal questioning and cognitive mastery (e.g., learning about heart monitors or about what surgeons do) to mediate their anxiety, whereas younger children are generally more dependent during times of extreme distress on adults' comforting interventions. [14-16] It also may be that for younger children, having their parent present but unable to intervene and protect them is, in and of itself, too novel and stressful and thus, not beneficial.
Bevan et al. reported that children of anxious parents were more anxious by having a parent present during induction of anesthesia than if they were separated. [3] Parental anxiety mediates children's response to stressful situations such as induction of anesthesia. Parents may act as stress reducers for their children, however, parents who are themselves more anxious in a given situation are less available to respond to their child's needs and his or her signals of increasing distress. Indeed, in these instances, children's distress may further compound parental anxiety, thus rendering the parent increasingly less able to respond effectively. Parental trait anxiety may therefore be associated with increased child's anxiety during induction of anesthesia.
Preschool children are old enough to appreciate the unfamiliar environment of the operating room and the separation from their parents. Their ability to cognitively process aspects of psychological preoperative preparation and develop effective coping strategies for dealing with their anxiety about the surgery, however, is still limited. Parental presence during induction of anesthesia has been suggested as one of the behavioral solutions for this problem. Although early studies suggested reduced anxiety and increased cooperation if parents were present during induction, [2] more recent investigations indicate that parental presence may not always be beneficial. [3,4] Furthermore, a recent preliminary report found less anxiety in preschool and school-aged children who were not accompanied by a parent during induction. [4] Some of these contradictory results may be explained by the methodological complexity of this issue. [17] Confounding variables such as a child's previous hospitalization or surgery, type of anesthesia induction (mask vs. intravenous), location of induction (operating room versus induction room) and the number of anesthesiologists participating in the study must be controlled. Other variables such as baseline anxiety and the interactions between the child, parent, and anesthesiologist should be considered. Evaluating the effectiveness of parental presence as an intervention to reduce anxiety also has been hindered by the absence of a statistically valid structured instrument for assessing anxiety, such as the YPAS used in the current study. Studies have been further limited by the absence of physiologic anxiety markers such as serum cortisol concentration.
In addition to validated behavioral measures, physiologic measures such as serum cortisol concentration, heart rate, and blood pressure were incorporated to evaluate the anxiety of the children and their parents. Numerous studies have demonstrated that acute psychological stress, including preoperative anxiety, is associated with increased serum cortisol concentrations. [18,19] This measure also has been used extensively to study the psychological reactions of pilots to flight stressors such as flying high-performance aircraft and crew workload and landing. [20,21] Ideally, the cortisol measure should be the change between baseline plasma concentrations and postinduction rather than a single value. Appropriate baseline plasma levels must be obtained in a relatively low stress atmosphere, such as at the patient's home several days before surgery. Because of logistical limitations this was not done.
Although a previous study suggested that parental presence may result in prolonged induction of anesthesia, this was not the case in our study. [22] We have shown that routine parental presence during induction of anesthesia can exist without affecting the length or safety of induction or the stress level of the anesthesiologist. This suggests that this intervention, if adopted for a selective patient population, can be used effectively in a busy practice setting.
It is important to note several important methodological issues that may limit the applicability of the results of this study to routine clinical practice. First, a single anesthesiologist administered all the anesthetics. Second, all children and their parents underwent a preoperative preparation program (see Methods) and it is possible that this program combined with a caring anesthesiologist minimized preoperative anxiety sufficiently to obviate the benefits of parental involvement. Third, all children in this study were not premedicated. Because all these variables may affect the response of the child to induction of anesthesia, the conclusions from the study should be received with caution. Finally, currently there is no "gold standard" to measure preoperative anxiety and therefore comparisons or correlations used to assess the validity of the behavioral instruments measure congruence between different tests rather than real validity. Although we have made every effort to use validated instruments to measure anxiety during induction of anesthesia, we must realize that this a limitation of the study and its conclusions. Ideally, all evaluators should be masked and unaware to the presence or absence of the parent. Surrogates could not be used because the children obviously would recognize their parents and their behavior would indicate to the evaluator the presence or absence of the parent. In addition, because the parents were an integral part of the induction we were unable to completely isolate the children from their parents while we were videotaping the induction.
In our study, parental presence was not associated with a decreased incidence of later behavioral problems. This is hardly surprising because of the short hospital exposure of our subjects. Previous investigators studied the potential value of parental presence on the emergence of negative behavioral responses and concluded that this intervention did not affect later behavioral outcomes. [1,3,23,24] .
In conclusion, this investigation demonstrates that parental presence during induction of anesthesia is beneficial only to some children, and the individual child, parent, and anesthesiologist should be considered whenever the question of parental presence arises.
Appendix
Emotionality, Activity, Sociability, Impulsivity (EASI). Instrument of child temperament. Temperament refers to individual patterns of behaviors and responses to daily events and is closely akin to "personality" in adults. [5] This instrument includes 20 items in four behavioral categories: emotionality, activity, sociability, and impulsivity. [5] The ratings are made by the mother on a 5-point scale, and a score ranges from 5 to 25 for each category with higher scores indicating higher baseline emotionality, activity, sociability, or impulsivity. The instrument has good validity (r = 0.77) when compared against other measures of temperament for preschool children. [25,26] Test-retest reliability of the EASI was 0.83 when mothers were rating their preschool children on adjacent months. [25,26] .
Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (YPAS). This observational measure of preoperative anxiety was developed and validated in an investigation involving 58 preschool children. [6] The YPAS consists of 27 items in five categories of behavior indicating anxiety in young children (Activity, Emotional expressivity, State of arousal, Vocalization, and Use of parents). Using Kappa statistics, all YPAS categories have been demonstrated to have good to excellent interobserver and intraobserver reliability (0.73-0.91), and when validated against other global behavioral measures of anxiety, the YPAS had good validity (r = 0.64). [6] The 'adjusted YPAS total score' ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.
Post Hospitalization Behavior Questionnaire (PHBQ). This questionnaire for parents is designed to evaluate behavioral responses and "developmental regression" in children after hospitalization or surgery. [7] Developmental regression refers to loss of previously gained developmental milestones (e.g. loses bladder control, loses previously gained language abilities--talks "baby talk"). The PHBQ consists of 27 items frequently cited in the literature as common behavioral responses of children after surgery or hospitalization. For each item, parents rated the extent to which each behavior changed in frequency as compared to before surgery. A summary score was calculated equivalent to the total of all negative behavioral responses. This instrument shows good agreement with psychiatric interviews with parents of preschool children (r = 0.47), and was used in several investigations to document behavioral changes as a function of preoperative interventions. [7,27,28] .
Clinical Anxiety Rating Scale (CARS). This scale was administered by the observers at the point of separation into the operating room. The child's anxiety is rated on a 6-point scale, ranging from "relaxed, smiling. . ." (score = 0) to "out of contact with reality. . .general loud crying. . ." (score = 5). [8,9] On a sample of 26 preschool children, interrater reliability of the CARS was reported to exceed 0.80, [9] and when compared to other measures of anxiety the CARS had good validity (r = 0.85). [9] .
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). This is a widely used self-report instrument that estimates situational and baseline anxiety in adults on the basis of responses to 40 statements.* Parents were asked to respond on a 4-point scale, total scores for situational and baseline questions separately range from 20 to 80 with higher scores denoting higher levels of anxiety. Test-retest correlations for the STAI were high (range 0.73-0.86). The reliability data are based on three groups of college students. The students retested after 1 h were exposed to the following experimental conditions: a brief period of relaxation training, a difficult intelligence quotient test, and a film depicting several accidents that resulted in serious injury.** Validity was examined in two studies in which the STAI was given under high- and low-stress conditions to large samples of students. The r value ranged from 0.83 to 0.94, suggesting very good construct (whether or not a scale accurately measures the construct its intended to measure) validity.*
Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is widely used as both a self-report and observational measure of anxiety. [10,11] The VAS rating system consists of a 100-mm line that represents two behavioral extremes at either end of the continuum, i.e., "not anxious" (score of 0) and "extremely anxious" (score of 100). The degree of anxiety felt or observed is indicated by putting a cross over the line at the point that represents current anxiety level. For the purpose of this study, the VAS was used as an observational measure to rate the children and as a self-report measure for the parents. Test-retest reliability of the VAS range from 0.61 to 0.73 when measured on adjacent days. [11,29] Also, when used to measure anxiety, the VAS has good validity against a self-rating depression scale (r = 0.64-0.67). [11] .
The authors thank Paul G. Barash, M.D., for critical review of the manuscript, and Lee Fleisher, M.D., and Stanley Rosenbaum, M.D. for help in the analysis of the Holter tapes.
*Spielberger CD: Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI: Form Y). Palo Alto, Consulting Psychologists Press, 1983.
REFERENCES
Hannallah RS, Rosales JK: Experience with parents' presence during anaesthesia induction in children. Can Anaesth Soc J 1983; 30:286-9.
Schulman JL, Foley JM, Vernon DT, Allan D: A study of the effect of the mother's presence during anesthesia induction. Pediatrics 1967; 39:111-4.
Bevan JC, Johnston C, Haig MJ, Tousignant G, Lucy S, Kirnon V, Assimes IK, Carranza R: Preoperative parental anxiety predicts behavioral and emotional responses to induction of anesthesia in children. Can J Anaesth 1990; 37:177-82.
Yemen T, Nelson W: Parental presence at induction: do the parents make the difference (abstract)? ANESTHESIOLOGY 1992; 77:A1167.
Buss AH, Plomin R, Willerman L: The inheritance of temperaments. J Pers 1973; 41:513-24.
Kain Z, Mayes L, Cicchetti D, Caramico L, Spieker M, Nygren M, Rimar S: A measurement tool for pre-operative anxiety in children: The Yale preoperative anxiety scale. Child Neuropsychol 1995; 1:203-10.
Vernon DT, Schulman JL, Foley JM: Changes in children's behavior after hospitalization. Am J Dis Child 1966;111:581-93.
Venham L, Gaulin-Kremer E, Munster E, Bengston-Audia D, Cohan J: Interval rating scales for children's dental anxiety and uncooperative behavior. Pediatr Dent 1980;2:195-202.
Venham L, Murray P, Gaulin-Kremer E: Personality factors affecting the preschool child's response to dental stress. J Dent Res 1979;58:2046-51.
Cella DF, Perry SW: Reliability and concurrent calidity of three visual analogue mood scales. Psychol Reports 1986; 59:827-33.
Folstein MF, Lauria R: Reliability, validity and clinical application of the visual analogue mood scale. Psychol Med 1973;3:479-86.
Mosteller FM, Tukey JW: Data Analysis and Regression. Reading, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1977.
Kagan J, Reznick JS, Snidman N: The physiology and psychology of behavioral inhibition in children. Child Dev 1987; 58:1459-73.
Cuthbert MI, Melamed BG: A screening device: Children at risk for dental fears and management problems. J Dent Child 1982; 49:432-6.
Lumley MA, Melamed BG, Abeles LA: Predicting children's presurgical anxiety and subsequent behavior changes. J Pediatr Psychol 1993; 18:481-97.
Hyson M: Going to the doctor: A devlopmental study of stress and coping. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1983; 24:247-59.
Kain Z: Parental presence during induction of anesthesia (editorial). Paediatr Anaesth 1995; 5:209-12.
Schedlowski M, Wiechert D, Wagner TOF, Tewes U: Acute psychological stress increases plasma levels of cortisol, prolactin and TSH. Life Sci 1992; 50:1201-5.
Van der Kar LD, Richardson-Morton KD, Rittenhouse PA: Stress revisited: 1. Neuroendocrinology of stress. Methods Achieve Exp Pathol 1991; 14:133-73.
Sive WJ, Hattingh J: The measurement of psychophysiological reactions of pilots to a stressor in a flight simulator. Aviat Space Environ Med 1991; 62:831-6.
Tarui H, Nakamura A: Hormonal responses of pilots flying high-performance aircraft during seven repetitive flight missions. Aviat Space Environ Med 1991; 62:1127-31.
Melamed B: Family factors predicting children's reaction to anesthesia induction, Stress and Coping in Child Health. Edited by La Greca A, Siegel L, Wallander J, Walker C. New York, The Guilford Press, 1992, pp 140-56.
Kain Z, Mayes L, Nygren M, Rimar R: Behavioral disturbances in children following surgery (abstract). ANESTHESIOLOGY 1994; 81:A1382.
Vernon DT, Thompson R: Research on the effect of experimental interventions on children's behavior after hospitalization: A review and synthesis. Dev Behav Pediatr 1993; 14:36-44.
Buss AH, Plomin R: Temperament: Early Developing Personality Traits. Hillsdale, L. Erlbaum, 1984.
Buss A, Plomin R: A Temperament Theory of Personality Development. New York, Wiley-Interscience Publications, 1975.
Vernon DT, Foley JM, Shulman JL: Effect of mother-child separation and birth order on young children's responses to two potentially stressful experiences. J Pers Soc Psychol 1967; 5:162-74.
Visintainer MA, Wolfer JA: Psychological preparation for surgical pediatric patients: The effect on children's and parents' stress responses and adjustment. Pediatrics 1975; 56:187-202.
Wewers ME, Lowe NK: A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health 1990; 13:227-36.
Figure 1. Time line of trial. Measures include EASI (Emotionality, Activity, Sociability, Impulsivity Instrument), STAI (State Trait Anxiety Inventory), VAS (Visual Analog Scale), HR (heart rate), BP (blood pressure), YPAS (Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale), CARS (Clinical Anxiety Rating Scale), and PHBQ (Post Hospitalization Behavior Questionnaire). Subjects measured at different times across the trial included the child (C), parent (P), and the anesthesiologist (A).
Figure 1. Time line of trial. Measures include EASI (Emotionality, Activity, Sociability, Impulsivity Instrument), STAI (State Trait Anxiety Inventory), VAS (Visual Analog Scale), HR (heart rate), BP (blood pressure), YPAS (Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale), CARS (Clinical Anxiety Rating Scale), and PHBQ (Post Hospitalization Behavior Questionnaire). Subjects measured at different times across the trial included the child (C), parent (P), and the anesthesiologist (A).
Figure 1. Time line of trial. Measures include EASI (Emotionality, Activity, Sociability, Impulsivity Instrument), STAI (State Trait Anxiety Inventory), VAS (Visual Analog Scale), HR (heart rate), BP (blood pressure), YPAS (Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale), CARS (Clinical Anxiety Rating Scale), and PHBQ (Post Hospitalization Behavior Questionnaire). Subjects measured at different times across the trial included the child (C), parent (P), and the anesthesiologist (A).
×
Table 1. Demographic and Baseline Characteristics
Image not available
Table 1. Demographic and Baseline Characteristics
×
Table 2. Behavioral and Physiologic Anxiety Scores among the Children
Image not available
Table 2. Behavioral and Physiologic Anxiety Scores among the Children
×
Table 3. Selected Behavioral and Physiologic Anxiety Scores among the Parents and the Anesthesiologist of the Study Subjects
Image not available
Table 3. Selected Behavioral and Physiologic Anxiety Scores among the Parents and the Anesthesiologist of the Study Subjects
×