Free
Clinical Science  |   March 1996
Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Cisatracurium in Geriatric Surgical Patients
Author Notes
  • (Ornstein) Associate Professor of Clinical Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University.
  • (Lien) Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology, The New York Hospital-Cornell University Medical Center.
  • (Matteo) Professor of Clinical Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University.
  • (Ostapkovich) Associate Research Scientist, Department of Anesthesiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University.
  • (Diaz) Senior Research Worker, Department of Anesthesiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University.
  • (Wolf) Clinical Research Scientist, Department of Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Burroughs Wellcome Co.
  • Received from the Departments of Anesthesiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, and The New York Hospital-Cornell University Medical Center, New York, New York, and the Department of Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Burroughs Wellcome Co., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Submitted for publication March 17, 1995. Accepted for publication November 8, 1995. Supported by a grant from Burroughs Wellcome Co. Presented in part at the annual meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, San Francisco, CA, October, 1994.
  • Address reprint requests to Dr. Ornstein: Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, New York, New York 10032. Address electronic mail to: eo4@columbia.edu.
Article Information
Clinical Science
Clinical Science   |   March 1996
Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Cisatracurium in Geriatric Surgical Patients
Anesthesiology 3 1996, Vol.84, 520-525. doi:
Anesthesiology 3 1996, Vol.84, 520-525. doi:
CISATRACURIUM (NIMBEX), an investigational muscle relaxant, is one of ten stereoisomers that comprise atracurium. The clinical pharmacology of cisatracurium has been studied in adult patients by Belmont et al. [1] and Lien et al. [2] Cisatracurium was found to be approximately three times more potent than atracurium and was devoid of cardiovascular side effects in doses of up to 8 times the ED95. The duration of cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade was similar to atracurium.
The elimination of atracurium is primarily dependent on spontaneous degradation by Hofmann elimination and hydrolysis by plasma esterases. [3] These pathways are not likely to be markedly affected by advancing age. However, some studies reported larger volumes of distribution and longer elimination half-lives in elderly patients than in younger patients. [4–6] .
Hofmann elimination may have a greater role in the elimination of cisatracurium than in the elimination of atracurium. [7] Thus, it is likely that the clearance of cisatracurium would not be altered by advancing age. The purpose of the current study was to delineate any differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cisatracurium in elderly patients compared to younger control patients.
Methods and Materials
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons. Written informed consent was obtained from 12 elderly (aged 65–82 yr) and 12 younger (aged 30–49 yr) adult patients scheduled for elective neurosurgical procedures. All patients were ASA physical status 1 or 2. Patients with significant renal, hepatic, metabolic, or neuromuscular disorders or whose body weights exceeded 150% of ideal body weight were excluded, as were those receiving anticonvulsants or other medications known to affect the response to neuromuscular blockers.
At the discretion of the anesthesiologist, patients were premedicated with 5–15 mg oral diazepam and/or 0.2 mg intramuscular glycopyrrolate approximately 90 min before arrival to the operating room. During placement of intravenous and intraarterial catheters, 0.01–0.04 micro gram/kg midazolam was administered intravenously. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental up to 10 mg/kg and fentanyl in 50–100-micro gram increments as needed to treat increases in heart rate and blood pressure. Maintenance anesthesia consisted of 0.7% isoflurane, end-tidal in nitrous oxide/oxygen (70/30), and additional fentanyl, as necessary.
Neuromuscular transmission was assessed in response to supramaximal train-of-four stimulation (0.2 ms at 2 Hz for 2 s) from a Grass S-88 stimulator and stimulus isolation unit to the ulnar nerve at the wrist repeated every 15 s. Evoked adductor pollicis twitch tension was measured with a Grass FT-10 force-displacement transducer. Baseline twitch response was obtained over 3 min, commencing at least 15 min after initiation of isoflurane. Cisatracurium (0.1 mg/kg, 2X the ED95 reported for adults during balanced anesthesia [1]) was administered intravenously over 5–10 s. Calculations of the degree of neuromuscular block were based on comparison of the first component of the train-of-four (T1) to baseline. For recovery data, comparisons were made to the final baseline, which averaged 99.5+/-14.2% of the initial baseline. Variables used to define the pharmacodynamic response included the times to onset of 90% and maximum blockade, the maximum intensity of muscle paralysis, and the times of return of twitch response to 5%, 25%, 75%, and 95% of baseline twitch. The 25–75% recovery index was calculated. The time at which the ratio of the fourth to first twitch of the train-of-four equaled or exceeded 70% was noted. The percent twitch suppression relative to baseline was also measured at the time of each blood sample.
Five-milliliter arterial blood samples were obtained in chilled tripotassium EDTA vacutainer tubes before and at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 20, 25, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 240, and 480 min after the administration of cisatracurium and placed in chilled microcentrifuge tubes. Each sample was immediately centrifuged for 45 s. Exactly 1 ml of the separated plasma was added to 4 ml of 15 mM H2SO4and mixed thoroughly. All processed samples were placed in ice within 2 min, 10 s of collection and frozen within 30 min of collection to prevent degradation. Plasma concentration of cisatracurium and laudanosine were determined using a validated high performance liquid chromatographic method with fluorescence detection.** The assay was sensitive to 100 *symbol* g/ml, with an accuracy of 9% and precision of 13% between the ranges of 10–2,000 *symbol* g/ml for cisatracurium and 10–1,000 *symbol* g/ml for laudanosine.
In patients requiring bladder catheterization, urine was collected for up to 10 h into 0.5 M sodium citrate buffer at pH 3.0. These samples were used to estimate the amounts of unchanged cisatracurium and its metabolites excreted by the kidney.
Bi- and triexponential functions were fit to the plasma cisatracurium concentration versus time data by generalized least-squares regression, with the inverse square of the predicted concentration used as the iterative weighting function. [8] Boxenbaum's method was used to determine whether a two- or three-compartment model provided a more appropriate fit to the data. [9] Pharmacokinetic parameters, including plasma clearance, half-life of elimination, initial volume of distribution, and steady-state volume of distribution*** were calculated using standard equations for bolus intravenous injection with elimination solely from the central compartment. [10] .
Data are expressed as mean values+/-SD. Comparison between groups were made with two-tailed Student's t-test. The threshold for statistical significance was set at P less or equal to 0.05.
Results
Demographic, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic data appear in Table 1. Because of the short duration of the surgical procedure, two elderly patients received neostigmine for antagonism of residual neuromuscular blockade before the attainment of 90% recovery. Of note, spontaneous recovery was moderately prolonged in these two elderly patients requiring neostigmine (T25 of 81 and 87 min).
Table 1. Summary of Demographic, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Data
Image not available
Table 1. Summary of Demographic, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Data
×
On examination of the pharmacokinetic data, Clp(9.9 ml *symbol* kg sup -1 *symbol* min sup -1) and Vss‘(257 ml/kg) from one of the younger control patients were determined to be outliers based on Dixon's criterion, or r-ratio test, comparing the distance of one end observation from its nearest neighbor with the range of all observations. [11,12] This patient was eliminated from summary statistics. Retrospective analysis suggests that this patient may have received a dose of cisatracurium that was lower than that required by the study protocol inasmuch as plasma cisatracurium concentrations for this patient ranged between 40% and 55% of the average for the young patients. Recovery to 25% of baseline was accelerated (33 min), with a recovery index (17 min) and elimination half-life (24.8 min) that was consistent with the other patients.
One elderly patient was chronically receiving diltiazem. Because calcium channel blockers may potentiate the effect of neuromuscular blockers, this patient was eliminated from the pharmacodynamic analysis. Recovery to 25% of baseline was delayed in this patient (71 min) with a increased recovery index (26 min).
Onset of paralysis to 90% twitch depression was delayed by approximately 1 min in the elderly group. Maximum twitch depression equaled or exceeded 95% in all patients. No significant differences were noted in spontaneous recovery profile between the two groups (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Times from injection of 0.1 mg/kg cisatracurium to recovery of 5%, 25%, 75%, and 95% of baseline twitch (n = 11 in each group). Data are mean with error bars denoting standard deviation.
Figure 1. Times from injection of 0.1 mg/kg cisatracurium to recovery of 5%, 25%, 75%, and 95% of baseline twitch (n = 11 in each group). Data are mean with error bars denoting standard deviation.
Figure 1. Times from injection of 0.1 mg/kg cisatracurium to recovery of 5%, 25%, 75%, and 95% of baseline twitch (n = 11 in each group). Data are mean with error bars denoting standard deviation.
×
Cisatracurium could be detected in plasma up to 120 min in 18 patients (10 elderly and 8 young), and in the remaining 6 patients (2 elderly and 4 young), up to 90 min. Pharmacokinetic data was described by a biexponential function. The plasma concentration versus time curves for the two groups (Figure 2) are almost superimposable. There was a 4-min prolongation (19%) in the elimination half-life in the elderly compared to the control group. There was a 17% increase in the volume of distribution in elderly patients; there was no difference in plasma clearance between elderly and younger patients.
Figure 2. (A) Individual plasma concentration versus time curves for 12 elderly patients. (B) Individual plasma concentration versus time curves for 11 young patients. (C) Plasma concentration (mean+/-sd) versus time curves following injection of 0.1 mg/kg cisatracurium. Each point up until 60 min represents mean value (log average) for 12 elderly or 11 younger control patients. At 90 min, n = 11 and 10, and at 120 min, n = 10 and 8, for the elderly and the young, respectively.
Figure 2. (A) Individual plasma concentration versus time curves for 12 elderly patients. (B) Individual plasma concentration versus time curves for 11 young patients. (C) Plasma concentration (mean+/-sd) versus time curves following injection of 0.1 mg/kg cisatracurium. Each point up until 60 min represents mean value (log average) for 12 elderly or 11 younger control patients. At 90 min, n = 11 and 10, and at 120 min, n = 10 and 8, for the elderly and the young, respectively.
Figure 2. (A) Individual plasma concentration versus time curves for 12 elderly patients. (B) Individual plasma concentration versus time curves for 11 young patients. (C) Plasma concentration (mean+/-sd) versus time curves following injection of 0.1 mg/kg cisatracurium. Each point up until 60 min represents mean value (log average) for 12 elderly or 11 younger control patients. At 90 min, n = 11 and 10, and at 120 min, n = 10 and 8, for the elderly and the young, respectively.
×
Urine was collected from only two elderly and four young patients and hence was not subjected to statistical analysis. Renal excretion of unchanged cisatracurium accounted for 9–15% of the injected dose in the elderly patients and 11–24% of the dose in the young patients.
The maximum plasma concentrations of laudanosine, a product of Hofmann elimination, were 22+/-5 ng/ml in elderly patients and 20 +/-5 ng/ml in the younger patients (NS). In most patients, laudanosine concentrations were quantifiable until up to 4 h (one predicted elimination half-life for laudanosine following atracurium administration [4]). The half-life of laudanosine could only be determined in six elderly patients and three younger patients and ranged from 4.4 to 10.9 h.
Discussion
The onset of neuromuscular block after a 2x ED95dose of cisatracurium is approximately 1 min longer in the elderly, possibly related to a slower circulation time. Slight prolongation of onset time for atracurium in elderly patients has been reported by other investigators. [13] The recovery profile is similar for both groups and prolonged by approximately one-third compared to previously reported data in patients not exposed to volatile anesthetics. [1] .
A larger distribution volume in the elderly contributed to a small increase in elimination half-life. The similar total clearances observed are consistent with the minor role played by renal elimination. Recent simulations suggest that organ-dependent elimination of cisatracurium is much less significant than previously reported for atracurium. [14,15] The age-related differences in distribution volume and half-life reported here lie within those reported for atracurium by Kitts et al. [5] and Kent et al. [4] It is of interest that the distribution volume for cisatracurium in the elderly was greater than in the young despite the decrease in extracellular fluid space associated with the aging process. [16] Similar findings by Kitts et al. [5] for atracurium were attributed to a potential decrease in plasma binding. [17] .
The two-compartment model used in this study assumed elimination from only the central compartment. As described by Fisher et al., a more accurate model would also account for elimination from the peripheral compartment. [17] Unfortunately, the inability to obtain an in vivo estimate for Hofmann elimination precluded the use of a model that included elimination from the peripheral compartment. Of note, Hull has suggested that inasmuch as plasma concentration is the only basis for the model, the single output model used in this study, despite conceptual limitations, is equally valid as a model with an additional output from the peripheral compartment. [18] Other limitations of the more complex model include the assumption that the rate constants for non-organ elimination are the same in the two compartments and are equal to that observed in vitro. [15] The choice of model does not affect the calculations of Clpand Vi, because these parameters are exit-site independent parameters. Vss, however, is underestimated if elimination from the peripheral (tissue) compartment is ignored. [19] .
Because the pharmacokinetic profile for cisatracurium is minimally affected by the aging process, there appears to be no difference between age groups in plasma laudanosine concentration. Laudanosine has been found to produce cerebral excitation or seizures when administered intravenous alone at high concentrations in some animal species. [20,21] The relationship between plasma laudanosine concentrations and adverse experiences in humans is unknown. Peak plasma laudanosine concentration of between 0.29 and 8.65 micro gram/ml during atracurium administration have been reported in patients in intensive care units. [22–28] No clinical evidence of cerebral irritation or excitation attributable to atracurium was reported in these cases.
In this study, the Cmaxfor laudanosine ranged from 15 to 29 ng/ml and from 13 to 30 ng/ml in elderly patients and younger control patients, respectively. These concentrations are > 100-fold lower than those associated with cerebral excitatory effects in rabbits [20] or dogs. [21] In addition, no cerebral irritation or excitation attributable to cisatracurium has been reported in the current study or in studies in ICU patients. [29] .
It is noteworthy that the small pharmacokinetic changes reported are almost imperceptible on examination of the plasma concentration versus time curve and that the recovery profiles are similar for the two groups. Because isoflurane dose was not adjusted for age, some of this small difference may be attributed to the slightly ([nearly equal] 10%) higher MAC exposure in the elderly. [30] .
In summary, the minor differences in the pharmacokinetics of cisatracurium in elderly patients were not associated with significant differences in the recovery profile after a single bolus dose of cisatracurium. The time to onset is approximately one-minute longer in elderly patients than in young patients.
**Harrelson JC: Personal communication. 1995.
***This parameter is underestimated when elimination from the peripheral compartment is ignored (see discussion).
REFERENCES
Belmont MR, Lien CA, Quessy S, Abou-Donia M, Abalos A, Eppich L, Savarese JJ: The clinical neuromuscular pharmacology of 51W89 in patients receiving nitrous oxide/opioid/barbiturate anesthesia. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1995; 82:1139-45.
Lien CA, Belmont MR, Abalos A, Eppich L, Quessy S, Abou-Donia MM, Savarese JJ: The cardiovascular effects and histamine-releasing properties of 51W89 in patients receiving nitrous oxide/opioid/barbiturate anesthesia. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1995; 82:1131-8.
Nigrovic V, Banoub M: Pharmacokinetic modelling of a parent drug and its metabolite: Atracurium and laudanosine. Clin Pharmacokinet 1992; 22:396-408.
Kent AP, Parker CJR, Hunter JM: Pharmacokinetics of atracurium and laudanosine in the elderly. Br J Anaesth 1989; 63:661-6.
Kitts JB, Fisher DM, Canfell PC, Spellman MJ, Caldwell JE, Heier T, Fahey MR, Miller RD: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of atracurium in the elderly. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1990; 72:272-5.
Parker CJR, Hunter JM, Snowdon SL: Effect of age, sex and anaesthetic technique on the pharmacokinetics of atracurium. Br J Anaesth 1992; 69:439-43.
Welch R, Brown A, Dahl R: In vitro degradation of cistatracurium in Sorensen buffer, rat, and human plasma. Clin Pharm Ther 1995; 58:132-4.
Giltinan DM, Ruppert D: Fitting heteroscedastic regression models to individual pharmacokinetic data using standard statistical software. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1992; 17:601-14.
Boxenbaum HJG, Riegelman S, Elashoff RM: Statistical estimation in pharmacokinetics. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1974; 2:121-48.
Wagner J: Linear pharmacokinetic equations allowing direct calculation of many needed pharmacokinetic parameters from the coefficients and exponents of polyexponential equations which have been fitted to the data. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1976; 4:443-67.
Dixon WJ, Massey FJJ: Introduction to Statistical Analysis. New York, McGraw Hill, 1969, p 328.
Dixon WJ: Processing data outliers. Biometrics 1953; 9:74-89.
Lowry KG, Mirakhur RK, Lavery GG, Clarke RSJ: Vecuronium and atracurium in the elderly: A clinical comparison with pancuronium. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1985; 29:405-8.
Kisor D, Wargin W, Weatherley B, Schmith V, Ornstein E, Cook RD: Organ-independent Hofman elimination is the dominant clearance pathway of the neuromuscular blocking agent 51W89 in humans. Pharm Res 1994; 11:S335.
Fisher DM, Canfell CP, Fahey MR, Rosen JI, Rupp SM, Sheiner LB, Miller RD: Elimination of atracurium in humans: Contributions of Hofmann elimination and ester hydrolysis versus organ-based elimination. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1986; 65:6-12.
Ritschel WA: Pharmacokinetic approach to drug dosing in the aged. J Am Geriatr Soc 1976; 24:344-54.
Wood M: Plasma drug binding: Implications for anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg 1986; 65:786-804.
Hull CJ: A model for atracurium? Br J Anaesth 1983; 55:95-6.
Nakashima E, Benet LZ: General treatment of mean residence time, clearance, and volume parameters in linear mammillary models with elimination from any compartment. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 1988; 16:475-92.
Shi WZ, Fahey MR, Fisher DM, Miller RD: Modification of central nervous system effects of laudanosine by inhalational anaesthetics. Br J Anaesth 1989; 63:598-600.
Chapple DJ, Miller AA, Ward JB, Wheatley PL: Cardiovascular and neurological effects of laudanosine. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59:218-25.
Parker CJR, Jones JE, Hunter JM: Disposition of infusions of atracurium and its metabolite, laudanosine, in patients in renal and respiratory failure in an ITU. Br J Anaesth 1988; 61:531-40.
Bion JF, Bowden MI, Chow B, Honisberger L, Weatherley BC: Atracurium infusions in patients with fulminent hepatic failure awaiting liver transplantation. Intensive Care Med 1993; S94-8.
Griffiths RB, Hunter JM, Jones RS: Atracurium infusions in patients with renal failure in an ITU. Anaesthesia 1986; 41:375-81.
Yate PM, Flynn PJ, Arnold RW, Weatherly BC, Simmons RJ, Dopson T: Clinical experience and plasma laudanosine concentrations during the infusion of atracurium in the intensive therapy unit. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59:211-7.
Peat SJ, Potter DR, Hunter JM: The prolonged use of atracurium in a patient with tetanus. Anaesthesia 1988; 43:962-3.
Pollard BJ, Harper NJN, Doran BRH: Use of continuous prolonged administration of atracurium in the ITU to a patient with myasthenia gravis. Br J Anaesth 1989; 62:95-7.
Gwinnutt CL, Eddelston JM, Edwards D, Pollard BJ: Concentrations of atracurium and laudanosine in cerebrospinal fluid and plasma in three intensive care patients. Br J Anaesth 1990; 65:829-32.
Prielipp RC, Coursin DB, Scuderi PE, Prough DS, Vender JE, Murray MJ: Dose response, safety, and recovery profile of a new neuromuscular blocking drug, 51W89, in patients in the intensive care unit (abstract). ANESTHESIOLOGY 1994; 81:A258.
Stevens WC, Dolan WM, Gibbons RT, White A, Eger EI II, Miller RD, deJong RH, Elashoff RM: Minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of isoflurane with and without nitrous oxide in patients of various ages. ANESTHESIOLOGY 1975; 42:197-200.
Figure 1. Times from injection of 0.1 mg/kg cisatracurium to recovery of 5%, 25%, 75%, and 95% of baseline twitch (n = 11 in each group). Data are mean with error bars denoting standard deviation.
Figure 1. Times from injection of 0.1 mg/kg cisatracurium to recovery of 5%, 25%, 75%, and 95% of baseline twitch (n = 11 in each group). Data are mean with error bars denoting standard deviation.
Figure 1. Times from injection of 0.1 mg/kg cisatracurium to recovery of 5%, 25%, 75%, and 95% of baseline twitch (n = 11 in each group). Data are mean with error bars denoting standard deviation.
×
Figure 2. (A) Individual plasma concentration versus time curves for 12 elderly patients. (B) Individual plasma concentration versus time curves for 11 young patients. (C) Plasma concentration (mean+/-sd) versus time curves following injection of 0.1 mg/kg cisatracurium. Each point up until 60 min represents mean value (log average) for 12 elderly or 11 younger control patients. At 90 min, n = 11 and 10, and at 120 min, n = 10 and 8, for the elderly and the young, respectively.
Figure 2. (A) Individual plasma concentration versus time curves for 12 elderly patients. (B) Individual plasma concentration versus time curves for 11 young patients. (C) Plasma concentration (mean+/-sd) versus time curves following injection of 0.1 mg/kg cisatracurium. Each point up until 60 min represents mean value (log average) for 12 elderly or 11 younger control patients. At 90 min, n = 11 and 10, and at 120 min, n = 10 and 8, for the elderly and the young, respectively.
Figure 2. (A) Individual plasma concentration versus time curves for 12 elderly patients. (B) Individual plasma concentration versus time curves for 11 young patients. (C) Plasma concentration (mean+/-sd) versus time curves following injection of 0.1 mg/kg cisatracurium. Each point up until 60 min represents mean value (log average) for 12 elderly or 11 younger control patients. At 90 min, n = 11 and 10, and at 120 min, n = 10 and 8, for the elderly and the young, respectively.
×
Table 1. Summary of Demographic, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Data
Image not available
Table 1. Summary of Demographic, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Data
×