Free
Meeting Abstracts  |   December 1996
Sympathetic and Mesenteric Venous Responses to Baroreceptor or Chemoreceptor Stimulation during Epidural Anesthesia in Rabbits
Author Notes
  • (Hogan) Associate Professor Department of Anesthesiology.
  • (Kulier) Research Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology.
  • (Bosnjak) Professor, Departments of Anesthesiology and Physiology.
  • (Kampine) Professor and Chairman, Department of Anesthesiology; Professor, Department of Physiology.
  • Received from the Departments of Anesthesiology and Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, and the Zablocki Veterans Administration Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Submitted for publication March 29, 1996. Accepted for publication July 30, 1996. Supported by Veterans Administration merit review #7793-02P and by National Institutes of Health training grant #GM08377.
  • Address reprint requests to Dr. Hogan: Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Anesthesiology, 8700 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226.
Article Information
Meeting Abstracts   |   December 1996
Sympathetic and Mesenteric Venous Responses to Baroreceptor or Chemoreceptor Stimulation during Epidural Anesthesia in Rabbits
Anesthesiology 12 1996, Vol.85, 1413-1421.. doi:
Anesthesiology 12 1996, Vol.85, 1413-1421.. doi:
Key words: Anesthetic techniques: epidural. Anesthetics, local: lidocaine. Sympathetic nervous system: venous capacitance; efferent nerve activity. Complications: hypotension; hypoxemia.
Severe hypotension and hypoxemia are unavoidable risks during epidural anesthesia. Homeostatic responses to stress depend heavily on sympathetic efferent pathways, so deficient compensation for hypotension and hypoxemia might be expected during the sympathetic blockade that accompanies epidural anesthesia. Although the importance of general anesthetics in modulating reflex activity induced by hypoxemia and hypotension has been documented extensively, [1-3] there has been much less investigation into alterations that accompany regional anesthesia. In particular, the contribution of specific vascular beds has not been determined, and actual sympathetic activity has not been measured to identify accurately the effects of sympathetic neural blockade.
Previous investigations have examined homeostatic reflexes during epidural and spinal anesthesia without directly measuring vascular response or sympathetic activity. Neuraxial local anesthetic blockade blunts sympathetic activation [4-6] and hemodynamic compensation [7] that otherwise follow hypovolemia, and high blockade partially suppresses baroreceptor reactivity. [8-11] Sympathetic responses resulting from airway stimulation, [9,12,13] cold pressor test, [14] and intravenous ketamine [15] are also attenuated by high epidural anesthesia. Finally, the pressor responses to hypercapnia [16-19] and hypoxemia [20] are diminished or converted to a depressor response by extensive epidural blockade (but not by narrow thoracic segmental block [21]). Although these investigations have broadly defined the impediment to reflex control resulting from neural blockade, the mechanisms are uncertain. Interference with both afferent pathways from peripheral sensors as well as efferent sympathetic motor fibers could contribute, and even blockade of efferent sympathetic traffic that modulates peripheral chemoreceptor [2] and baroreceptor [1] sensitivity could play a role, but the relative importance of each of these has not been elucidated. In addition, most previous studies have not tried to identify which vascular beds are of particular importance for hemodynamic control, although Jordan and Miller [7] highlighted the role of splanchnic innervation in conducting the response to hemorrhage. Finally, the indirect measures of sympathetic activation used in these studies, such as circulating catecholamines, [4,6,7,20] represent global changes and can only loosely indicate responses in specific tissue beds.
To determine more exactly the role of sympathetic activity and regional vascular responses during epidural anesthesia, we used direct measures of regional sympathetic neural traffic and vascular volumetric change. [22-24] These earlier studies showed that mesenteric venous dilatation contributes to hypotension during extensive epidural blockade, and that mesenteric venous constriction from increased splanchnic neural activity tempers hemodynamic changes in less-extensive blocks. Because abnormal reflex response to hypoxia and hypotension may contribute to catastrophic cardiovascular collapse during neuraxial anesthesia, [25,26] here we extend those previous observations to examine responses to stress during epidural anesthesia. We tested the hypothesis that splanchnic sympathetic blockade from thoracolumbar epidural anesthesia attenuates reflex venous capacitance changes, leading to diminished hemodynamic responses to hypoxemia and bilateral carotid occlusion.
Methods
Preparation
The basic preparation is the same as in a previous report, [22] where it is described in greater detail. After we received approval by our animal care and use committee, we induced anesthesia in male New Zealand White rabbits (weighing 1 to 2 kg) with 10 to 25 mg/kg thiopental via an ear vein and maintained by alpha-chloralose (25 mg/h). An epidural catheter (0.965 mm OD) was inserted via a small incision at the T12-L1 interspace. The trachea, femoral artery, and femoral vein were cannulated and the carotid arteries exposed. Subcutaneous lidocaine 0.5% was infiltrated at all incision sites. The study was performed during the infusion of 0.3 mg/kg/h vecuronium, and ventilation was controlled. An inspired oxygen concentration (FIO2) of 100% was administered except during hypoxia, as will be described. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were determined from the pressure trace from the femoral artery catheter. Normal baseline PCO2(35 to 40 mmHg) and pH (7.35 to 7.45) were maintained by ventilator adjustments and administration of NaHCO3guided by arterial blood gas determination; no correction was attempted while hypoxic gas mixtures were being given. Rectal temperature was maintained between 36.5 and 37.5 degrees Celsius by a warming pad.
Through a midline laparotomy, a postganglionic splanchnic nerve was dissected from the adjacent tissue, maintaining continuity proximally and distally. A bipolar recording electrode, composed of two single-strand stainless steel wires (0.25 mm OD) in Silastic tubing, was fixed to the nerve with Wacker silgel (Wacker-Chemie, Munich, Germany) to directly measure sympathetic efferent nerve activity. [27] 
A loop of ileum was externalized through the laparotomy and mounted in a temperature-regulated plastic chamber. The diameter of the mesenteric vein (500 to 800 micro meter) was measured continuously via an on-line videomicrometer system. [28] The ileum and associated mesentery were superfused continuously with warmed physiologic salt solution formulated to simulate peritoneal fluid. This solution was maintained at a temperature of 37 degrees Celsius and a pH of 7.35 to 7.45 and continuously bubbled with a gas mixture of 5% oxygen, 5% carbon dioxide, and 90% nitrogen. The preparation was considered acceptable if the vein was responsive by contracting during hypoxia (FIO2= 0% for 40 s); in about 70% of the animals, the first vein examined proved to be satisfactory.
The vertebral columns of the animals were dissected after they were killed to confirm epidural catheter placement and fluid distribution, indicated by staining of the dura and spinal canal by ink included in the injectate.
Protocol
After a rest period of 1 h and establishment of stable hemodynamic measurements, 25 ml/kg warmed normal saline was administered intravenously for 15 min. Animals were randomly assigned to the control group, which received 1 ml/kg intramuscular lidocaine 1.5% (n = 7), or to the study group, which received 0.4 ml/kg epidural lidocaine 1.5% (n = 7). These doses were chosen to produce thoracolumbar blockade of all vertebral segments with preganglionic sympathetic outflow in the epidural group, and to produce comparable serum lidocaine concentrations (not measured in this study). [22] Normal saline was injected intramuscularly in the epidural lidocaine group and epidurally in the intramuscular lidocaine control group.
Each animal was repeatedly exposed to three different stress protocols (Figure 1). An FIO2of 0% was administered for 40 s by substituting nitrogen for oxygen in the inspired gas mixture. After complete recovery of hemodynamic variables (280 s), bilateral carotid occlusion (BCO) was performed for 60 s using vascular clamps. After another recovery interval of 3 min, an FIO2of 11% was administered for 2.5 min by switching fresh gas flow to a mixture of nitrogen and oxygen previously set at that level by an in-line polarographic oxygen analyzer (Instrument Laboratory model 408, Lexington, MA). Mechanical ventilation was maintained unchanged throughout the study, and intervals between hypoxia and BCO events were adequate for hemodynamic measures to return completely to prestress baseline levels. The set of three stresses were performed before lidocaine injection ("baseline"), immediately after injection ("early"), and three times subsequently ("middle," "late," and "recovery") to encompass the entire course of blockade. Hemodynamic changes from epidural blockade take about 5 min to evolve, so the FIO2of 0% at the early time interval is during the incomplete onset of the block.
Figure 1. Protocol for presentation of FIO2of 0%, bilateral carotid occlusion, and FIO2of 11%, before epidural or intramuscular lidocaine administration and four times later.
Figure 1. Protocol for presentation of FIO2of 0%, bilateral carotid occlusion, and FIO2of 11%, before epidural or intramuscular lidocaine administration and four times later.
Figure 1. Protocol for presentation of FIO2of 0%, bilateral carotid occlusion, and FIO2of 11%, before epidural or intramuscular lidocaine administration and four times later.
×
Blood gas determinations were performed in each animal during both hypoxic events just before termination of the hypoxic gas flow.
Intravenous Pressure
To determine whether vein diameter changes were active or a passive result of decreased vein pressure, intraluminal mesenteric vein pressure was monitored during an FIO2of 11% (n = 3 animals), BCO (n = 3 animals), and an FIO2of 0% (n = 6 animals) using a servo-null system. [29] Glass micropipettes, beveled to a 5- to 10-micro meter tip diameter, were filled with 2 M NaCl, inserted into the vein using a micromanipulator, and used as sensing electrodes with a servo-null pressure measuring system (model 900, World Precision Instruments, New Haven, CT). Observations were made both at baseline and after epidural or intramuscular lidocaine injection.
Statistics
Statistical analyses were performed on actual values before conversion to percentile figures. Univariate analysis of variance for repeated measures was used (Super ANOVA; Abacus Corporation, Berkeley, CA). On main effects or interactions with significant (P < 0.05) F values, denominator-adjusted t tests were performed. Significance of increment change during each stress event was also evaluated by analysis of variance. Results are reported as mean +/- SE.
Results
The weights of animals in the intramuscular control and epidural study groups were comparable. FIO2of 11% resulted in a PaO2of 34 +/- 1 mmHg, and FIO2of 0% produced a Pa sub O2of 17 +/- 2 mmHg. Epidural injectate spread of at least T1 through L3 was confirmed in all animals.
(Figure 2)* illustrates typical responses. Group mean data are graphed in Figure 3, Figure 4, and Figure 5(note that scales are not identical) and summarized below.
Figure 2. Sample tracings of heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), vein diameter (VD), averaged sympathetic efferent nerve activity (AVG SENA), and raw SENA, during FIO2of 0%, bilateral carotid occlusion (BCO), and FIO2of 11%. Before epidural lidocaine (arrow), FIO2of 0% produces bradycardia and mild hypertension, accompanied by marked elevation in SENA and venoconstriction. Marked decrease of SENA after FIO2of 0% is a consistent feature after intense sympathetic stimulation. Hypertension, slight tachycardia, sympathetic activation, and venoconstriction are induced by BCO. FIO2of 11% results in hypertension and venoconstriction despite minimal sympathetic activation. One minute after epidural lidocaine injection, hypotension and venodilation are evident and SENA is almost eliminated, at which time FIO2of 0% still produces bradycardia, sympathetic activation, and venoconstriction but with hypotension. During epidural anesthesia, FIO2of 11% causes bradycardia and hypotension.
Figure 2. Sample tracings of heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), vein diameter (VD), averaged sympathetic efferent nerve activity (AVG SENA), and raw SENA, during FIO2of 0%, bilateral carotid occlusion (BCO), and FIO2of 11%. Before epidural lidocaine (arrow), FIO2of 0% produces bradycardia and mild hypertension, accompanied by marked elevation in SENA and venoconstriction. Marked decrease of SENA after FIO2of 0% is a consistent feature after intense sympathetic stimulation. Hypertension, slight tachycardia, sympathetic activation, and venoconstriction are induced by BCO. FIO2of 11% results in hypertension and venoconstriction despite minimal sympathetic activation. One minute after epidural lidocaine injection, hypotension and venodilation are evident and SENA is almost eliminated, at which time FIO2of 0% still produces bradycardia, sympathetic activation, and venoconstriction but with hypotension. During epidural anesthesia, FIO2of 11% causes bradycardia and hypotension.
Figure 2. Sample tracings of heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), vein diameter (VD), averaged sympathetic efferent nerve activity (AVG SENA), and raw SENA, during FIO2of 0%, bilateral carotid occlusion (BCO), and FIO2of 11%. Before epidural lidocaine (arrow), FIO2of 0% produces bradycardia and mild hypertension, accompanied by marked elevation in SENA and venoconstriction. Marked decrease of SENA after FIO2of 0% is a consistent feature after intense sympathetic stimulation. Hypertension, slight tachycardia, sympathetic activation, and venoconstriction are induced by BCO. FIO2of 11% results in hypertension and venoconstriction despite minimal sympathetic activation. One minute after epidural lidocaine injection, hypotension and venodilation are evident and SENA is almost eliminated, at which time FIO2of 0% still produces bradycardia, sympathetic activation, and venoconstriction but with hypotension. During epidural anesthesia, FIO2of 11% causes bradycardia and hypotension.
×
Figure 3. Changes in heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), sympathetic efferent nerve activity (SENA), and vein diameter (VD) produced by bilateral carotid occlusion (BCO) before and four times after epidural or intramuscular injection of lidocaine (arrow and dotted line). Each pair of data points connected by a line represent the initial value immediately before BCO and the value during BCO. Baseline for SENA and VD are values just before injection. Values are means +/- SE. *Significant change. (section)Significant difference between changes in epidural and intramuscular groups.
Figure 3. Changes in heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), sympathetic efferent nerve activity (SENA), and vein diameter (VD) produced by bilateral carotid occlusion (BCO) before and four times after epidural or intramuscular injection of lidocaine (arrow and dotted line). Each pair of data points connected by a line represent the initial value immediately before BCO and the value during BCO. Baseline for SENA and VD are values just before injection. Values are means +/- SE. *Significant change. (section)Significant difference between changes in epidural and intramuscular groups.
Figure 3. Changes in heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), sympathetic efferent nerve activity (SENA), and vein diameter (VD) produced by bilateral carotid occlusion (BCO) before and four times after epidural or intramuscular injection of lidocaine (arrow and dotted line). Each pair of data points connected by a line represent the initial value immediately before BCO and the value during BCO. Baseline for SENA and VD are values just before injection. Values are means +/- SE. *Significant change. (section)Significant difference between changes in epidural and intramuscular groups.
×
Figure 4. Changes produced by FIO2of 0%. The symbols are the same as those in Figure 3.
Figure 4. Changes produced by FIO2of 0%. The symbols are the same as those in Figure 3.
Figure 4. Changes produced by FIO2of 0%. The symbols are the same as those in Figure 3.
×
Figure 5. Changes produced by FIO2of 11%. The symbols are the same as those in Figure 3.
Figure 5. Changes produced by FIO2of 11%. The symbols are the same as those in Figure 3.
Figure 5. Changes produced by FIO2of 11%. The symbols are the same as those in Figure 3.
×
Heart Rate
Bilateral carotid occlusion caused a modest heart rate increase under baseline conditions, whereas both degrees of hypoxia produced bradycardia. Heart rate was decreased by epidural lidocaine but not by intramuscular lidocaine. The small heart rate response to BCO was inconsistent after lidocaine injection in both groups, and no differences between groups were noted. FIO2of 0% resulted in significantly less heart rate change during epidural anesthesia than after intramuscular lidocaine, although a bradycardic response persisted. Bradycardia from F sub I O2of 11% was not affected by epidural anesthesia, and the bradycardia response in the epidural group decreased during recovery from the block. Intramuscular lidocaine may attenuate the heart rate response to FIO2of 11%.
Mean Arterial Pressure
During baseline testing, MAP was increased by BCO. Mean arterial pressure was decreased by FIO2of 0% and increased by FIO2of 11%. Epidural anesthesia significantly decreased the pressor effect of BCO, amplified the MAP decrease from FIO2of 0%, and caused the response from FIO2of 11% to become depressor instead of pressor.
Sympathetic Efferent Nerve Activity
Increased sympathetic efferent nerve activity was caused by BCO and FIO2of 0% at the baseline exposure, but no consistent response was seen with the more modest hypoxia of FIO2of 11%. Epidural anesthesia eliminated the response to BCO and significantly attenuated the response to FIO2of 0%. Whereas FIO2of 11% produced sympathetic efferent nerve activity activation after intramuscular lidocaine, this was absent after epidural lidocaine.
Vein Diameter
Mesenteric venoconstriction was produced by BCO as well as by both hypoxic stresses under baseline conditions. Epidural anesthesia caused an increase in vein diameter and eliminated the slight BCO response. The response to FIO2of 0% persisted during epidural anesthesia but was significantly lessened compared with the responses in the intramuscular control group. The response to FIO2of 11% was eliminated by epidural anesthesia.
Intravenous Pressure
Insignificant micropressure changes were found during exposure to FIO2of 0%, FIO2of 11%, and BCO at baseline and after either epidural or intramuscular lidocaine.
Discussion
In accordance with our hypothesis, the data show that extensive epidural anesthesia in rabbits impedes hemodynamic compensation for hypoxia and BCO. Active mesenteric venoconstriction from moderate hypoxemia and BCO is eliminated by epidural anesthesia, and venoconstriction from severe hypoxemia is attenuated. By interrupting reflex mechanisms, epidural anesthesia intensifies the direct hemodynamic depressant effects of severe hypoxemia, eliminates MAP correction during baroreceptor stimulation, and causes moderate hypoxemia to decrease MAP rather than increase it. As in earlier studies, epidural anesthesia almost completely eliminates tonic splanchnic sympathetic traffic. Despite this, intense stimulation by 0% oxygen, but not by 11% oxygen or BCO, produces significant neural activation.
Baroreceptor Response
Hemodynamic events after baroreceptor stimulation are a complex product of multiple mechanisms. [1] Afferent axons conveying information about systemic pressure originate not only in the carotid sinus but also in the aorta and heart. Effector mechanisms for blood pressure adjustment include both cardiac and vasomotor stimulation and are conveyed by sympathetic and parasympathetic pathways. Circulatory capacitance changes during baroreflex responses are due primarily to active changes in splanchnic venous tone. [30] Baroreceptor stimuli first induce vagal responses that have essentially no time lag and induce sympathetic responses with sustained pressure changes. Bilateral carotid occlusion is well established as a physiologic tool, principally because of the immediacy of the response. However, the limitations of this method include stimulation of only the carotid baroreceptors, examination of the response to only one carotid sinus pressure level, and the use of a stimulus pressure that is uncontrolled, nonpulsatile, and brief. Therefore, our finding that epidural anesthesia compromises baroreceptor response should be considered only as a preliminary observation.
Decreased baroreceptor drive of heart rate during epidural anesthesia is due in part to unloading of low-pressure cardiopulmonary receptors [31] and to interruption of cardiac acceleratory fibers. [8-11] Influences of epidural anesthesia on vascular responses to baroreceptor stimulation have not been examined before. In the present study, BCO produced increased sympathetic activity to the mesenteric venous reservoir, which caused vasoconstriction. Because intraluminal pressure did not change with BCO, decreased vein diameter can be attributed to active reflex increase in vein wall tension. Because decreased sympathetic efferent nerve activity, vein diameter, and MAP responsiveness to BCO follow the same time course during the onset and offset of epidural block, epidural blockade of splanchnic sympathetic activation and mesenteric venoconstriction is probably a factor contributing to elimination of the blood pressure response to BCO during epidural anesthesia.
Chemoreceptor Response
Even greater complexity characterizes the cardiovascular response to systemic hypoxemia, which results from interactions of effects at several sites. [2,32] Hypoxemia has direct tissue actions, vasodilating most beds and depressing cardiac performance. However, increased MAP is seen in intact animals due to reflex stimulation of both peripheral chemoreceptors (carotid and aortic bodies) and the central nervous system, each leading to increased sympathetic efferent activity. Neural controlled venous capacitance changes in the splanchnic circulation play a key role in supporting circulatory homeostasis during hypoxia. [33,34] The integrated cardiovascular response typically includes vasoconstriction and cardiac stimulation, with variable heart rate changes. When pulmonary stretch receptors are activated by hyperventilation in spontaneously breathing animals, an increase in heart rate is usually seen, but bradycardia is a more common consequence of hypoxemia during controlled ventilation. Further complexity is added by positive interactions of arterial baroreceptor input and peripheral chemoreceptor input [35] and baroreceptor augmentation of the central pressor effect, [36] such that cardiovascular responses to hypoxemia are accentuated by decreased systemic arterial pressure.
The levels of experimental hypoxia used in this study were chosen to reflect two different clinical circumstances. Abrupt and severe tissue hypoxia was modeled experimentally by administering 0% oxygen, which results in predictable hypoxemia and avoids added influences of hypercarbia. This degree of hypoxemia is an intense sympathetic stimulus that produces immediate mesenteric venoconstriction. Blood pressure often increased initially but was on average depressed after 40 s despite sympathetic excitation. This probably results from global direct effects of profound hypoxemia, including decreased peripheral vascular resistance, [37] bradycardia, and myocardial depression. [38,39] When epidural anesthesia prevents sympathetic stimulation, direct effects of hypoxia are unopposed and hypotension during F1O2of 0% is intensified.
Our results show that sympathetic blockade from epidural anesthesia is complex. Ventilation with F1O2of 0% provokes sympathetic activation despite local anesthetic blockade adequate to produce hypotension and near-total ablation of baseline sympathetic activity. This differential effect of epidural block on tonic and phasic neural traffic may in part explain the variable extent and intensity of sympathetic interruption reported in studies using different measures of sympathetic activity. Sympathetic blockade is clearly not "all or none," and it is doubtful that blockade could be achieved in which sympathetic fibers are exclusively but completely interrupted, as is proposed during diagnostic differential blockade. In addition, others have shown that sympathetic activation by hypoxia is not uniform, because decreased cutaneous activity accompanies splanchnic excitation. [40] 
Ventilation with 11% oxygen allowed a sustained hypoxic exposure, during which hemodynamic variables reached a steady state. This pattern of hypoxia represents a severe but survivable degree of hypoxemia as might follow advanced pulmonary dysfunction. We documented active constriction of mesenteric veins as a component of the vasopressor response that follows presentation of 11% oxygen. Because average sympathetic efferent nerve activity was minimally changed, venoconstriction may be du in part to direct effects of moderate hypoxia on mesenteric veins. [41] Epidural anesthesia eliminates sympathetic activation evident in control animals and prevents the vasoconstrictor response. Profound sympathetic blockade after epidural anesthesia may block direct effects of hypoxia as well as neural effects because the direct venoconstrictor action of hypoxia depends on the presence of sympathetic activity. [41] The net result of epidural blockade is that this degree of hypoxemia becomes a depressor of MAP because the direct circulatory depression of hypoxemia [42] predominates in the absence of autonomic compensation.
Clinical Relevance
Reflex responses to chemoreceptor and baroreceptor stimulation depend on the details of the model, making generalization difficult. [2] For instance, although alpha-chloralose is minimally disruptive to sympathetic reflexes, [43] its use in our study may have potentiated the effects of epidural sympathetic interruption. Heart rate changes during hypoxemia differ in mechanically ventilated and spontaneously breathing animals, [44] but vascular responses are not affected. [45] Volatile anesthesia inhibits baroreceptor and chemoreceptor reflex activity [46,47] comparably to that which we observed with epidural anesthesia.
The importance of hemodynamic responses to hypoxia and hypotension is uncertain. Organ dysfunction such as myocardial ischemia or peripheral hypoperfusion may ensue from intense activation of stress responses, so that limiting these reflexes has become an anesthetic goal advocated by many authors. However, impaired compensatory responses during anesthesia might also lead to tissue injury or hemodynamic collapse. Loss of sympathetic mechanisms may be particularly harmful during hypoxemia because direct circulatory depressant effects of hypoxemia may then predominate. Hypoxia and hypotension are observed components of unexpected cardiopulmonary collapse that may develop during otherwise unremarkable clinical neuraxial anesthesia. [25] This may be due in part to the combined effects of circulatory depression from neuraxial anesthesia and obtunded sympathetic reflexes as documented in this study.
Sympathetic blockade interferes with intrinsic compensatory reflexes. Although caution is necessary in applying these observations to anesthesia for our human patients, these findings indicate that loss of adequate compensatory responses to hypoxia and hypotension erodes the margin of safety during extensive neuraxial anesthesia. Therefore, more aggressive correction of hypoxia and hypotension may be advisable during stable epidural block than when the sympathetic nervous system is unimpaired.
*Kilbourne EM, Hageman GR, James TN, Urthaler F. Post-excitatory depression in thoracic sympathetic efferent neural traffic during a cardiogenic hypertensive chemoreflex. Basic Res Cardiol 1982;77:423-30.
REFERENCES
Sagawa K: Baroreflex control of systemic arterial pressure and vascular bed. Handbook of Physiology, The Cardiovascular System Volume III. Edited by JT Shepherd, FM Abboud. Bethesda, MD, American Physiological Society, 1983, pp 453-96.
Eyzaguirre C, Fitzgerald RS, Lahiri S, Zapata P: Arterial chemoreceptors. Handbook of Physiology, The Cardiovascular System Volume III. Edited by Shepherd JT, Abboud FM. Bethesda, American Physiological Society, 1983, pp 566-621.
Seagard JL, Bosnjak ZJ, Hopp FA, Kotrly KJ, Ebert TJ, Kampine JP: Cardiovascular effects of general anesthesia, Effects of Anesthesia. Edited by BG Covino, HA Fozzard, K Rehder, G Strichartz. Bethesda, MD, American Physiological Society, 1985, pp 149-77.
Stanek B, Schwarz M, Zimper M, Raberger G: Plasma concentrations of noradrenaline and adrenaline and plasma renin activity during extradural blockade in dogs. Br J Anaesth 1980; 52:305-11.
Ecoffey C, Edouard A, Prusczynski W, Taly E, Samii K: Effects of epidural anesthesia on catecholamines, renin activity, and vasopressin changes induced by tilt in elderly men. Anesthesiology 1985; 62:294-7.
Shibata K, Yamamoto Y, Murakami S: Effects of epidural anesthesia on cardiovascular response and survival in experimental hemorrhagic shock in dogs. Anesthesiology 1989; 71:953-9.
Jordan DA, Miller ED: Subarachnoid blockade alters homeostasis by modifying compensatory splanchnic responses to hemorrhagic hypotension. Anesthesiology 1991; 75:654-61.
Dohi S, Tsuchida H, Mayumi T: Baroreflex control of heart rate during cardiac sympathectomy by epidural anesthesia in lightly anesthetized humans. Anesth Analg 1983; 62:815-20.
Takeshima R, Dohi S: Circulatory responses to baroreflexes, Valsalva maneuver, coughing, swallowing, and nasal stimulation during acute cardiac sympathectomy by epidural blockade in awake humans. Anesthesiology 1985; 63:500-8.
Bonnet F, Szekely B, Abhay K, Touboul Ch, Boico O, Saada M: Baroreceptor control after cervical epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing carotid artery surgery. J Cardiothorc Anesth 1989; 3:418-24.
Goertz A, Heinrich H, Seeling W: Baroreflex control of heart rate during high thoracic epidural anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1992; 47:984-7.
Dohi S, Nishikawa T, Ujike Y, Mayumi T: Circulatory responses to airway stimulation and cervical epidural blockade. Anesthesiology 1982; 57:359-63.
Wattwil M, Sundberg A, Olsson J, Nordstrom S: Thoracolumbar epidural anaesthesia blocks circulatory response to laryngoscopy and intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1987; 31:529-31.
Stevens R, Beardsley D, White JL, Kao T-C, Teague PJ, Spitzer L: Does the choice of local anesthetic affect the catecholamine response to stress during epidural anesthesia? Anesthesiology 1993; 79:1219-26.
Mayumi T, Dohi S, Takahashi T: Cardiovascular effects of ketamine in humans with cervical or lumbar epidural blockade. Anesthesiology 1985; 62:39-43.
Sundberg A, Wattwil M, Wirklund L: Circulatory effects of short-term hypercapnia during thoracolumbar epidural anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1987; 31:139-42.
Mills CA, Flacke JW, Miller JD, Davis LJ, Bloor BC, Flacke WE: Cardiovascular effects of fentanyl reversal by naloxone at varying arterial carbon dioxide tensions in dogs. Anesth Analg 1988; 67:730-36.
Stevens R, Lineberry PJ, Arcario TJ, Bacon GS, Cress LW: Epidural anaesthesia attenuates the catecholamine response to hypoventilation. Can J Anaesth 1990; 37:867-72.
Shibata K, Futagami A, Taki Y, Kobayashi T: Epidural anesthesia modifies the cardiovascular response to marked hypercapnia in dogs. Anesthesiology 1994; 81:1454-60.
Peters J, Kutkuhn B, Medert HA, Schlaghecke R, Schluttler J, Arndt JO: Sympathetic blockade by epidural anesthesia attenuates the cardiovascular response to severe hypoxemia. Anesthesiology 1990; 72:134-44.
Sundberg A, Wattwil M: Circulatory effects of short-term hypercapnia during high thoracic epidural anaesthesia in elderly patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1987; 31:81-6.
Hogan QH, Stadnicka A, Stekiel TA, Bosnjak ZJ, Kampine JP: Effects of epidural and systemic lidocaine on sympathetic activity and mesenteric circulation in rabbits. Anesthesiology 1993; 79:1250-60.
Hogan QH, Stadnicka A, Stekiel TA, Bosnjak ZJ, Kampine JP: Mechanism of mesenteric venodilatation during epidural anesthesia in rabbits. Anesthesiology 1994; 81:939-45.
Hogan QH, Stadnicka A, Stekiel TA, Bosnjak ZJ, Kampine JP: Region of epidural blockade determines sympathetic and mesenteric capacitance effects in rabbits. Anesthesiology 1995; 83:604-10.
Caplan RA, Ward RJ, Posner K, Cheney FW: Unexpected cardiac arrest during spinal anesthesia: A closed claims analysis of predisposing factors. Anesthesiology 1988; 68:5-11.
Jacobsen J, Sofelt S, Brocks V, Fernandes A, Warberg J, Secher NH: Reduced left ventricular diameters at onset of bradycardia during epidural anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1992; 36:831-6.
Hopp FA, Seagard JL, Kampine JP: Comparison of four methods of averaging nerve activity. Am J Physiol 1986; 251:R700-11.
Bell L, Hopp F, Seagard J, van Brederode H, Kampine J: A continuous noncontact method for measuring in situ vascular diameter with a video camera. J Appl Physiol 1988; 64:1279-84.
Ozono K, Bosnjak ZJ, Kampine JP: Reflex control of mesenteric vein diameter and pressure in situ in rabbits. Am J Physiol 1989; 256:H1066-72.
Hoka S, Bosnjak ZJ, Siker D, Luo R, Kampine JP: Dynamic changes in venous outflow by baroreflex and left ventricular distension. Am J Physiol 1988; 254:R212-21.
Baron JF, Decaus-Jacolot A, Edouard A, Berdeaux A, Samii K: Influence of venous return on baroreflex control of heart rate during lumbar epidural anesthesia in humans. Anesthesiology 1986; 64:188-93.
Heistad DD, Abboud FM. Circulatory adjustments to hypoxia. Circulation 1980; 61:463-70.
Hainsworth R, Karim F, McGregor KH, Wood LM: Responses of abdominal vascular resistance and capacitance to stimulation of carotid chemoreceptors in anaesthetized dogs. J Physiol 1983; 334:409-19.
Hoka S, Bosnjak ZJ, Arimura H, Kampine JP: Regional venous outflow, blood volume, and sympathetic activity during severe hypoxia. Am J Physiol 1989; 256:H162-70.
Lahiri S, Nishino T, Mokashi A, Mulligan AE: Relative responses of aortic body and carotid body chemoreceptors to hypotension. J Appl Physiol 1980; 48:781-8.
Heisted DD. Circulatory adjustments to hypoxia. Circulation 1982; 61:463-70.
Rothe CF, Flanagan AD, Maass-Moreno R: Reflex control of vascular capacitance during hypoxia, hypercapnia, or hypoxic hypercapnia. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1990; 68:384-91.
Cross CE, Rieben PA, Barron CI, Salisbury PF: Effects of arterial hypoxia on the heart and circulation: An integrative study. Am J Physiol 1963; 205:963-70.
Ng ML, Levy MN, DeGeest H, Zieske H: Effects of myocardial hypoxia on left ventricular performance. Am J Physiol 1966; 211:43-50.
Iriki M, Walther OE, Pleschka K, Simon E: Regional cutaneous and visceral sympathetic activity during asphyxia in the anesthetized rabbit. Pflugers Arch 1971; 322:167-82.
Stadnicka A, Stekiel TA, Hogan QH, Bosnjak ZJ, Kampine JP: Hypoxic contraction of isolated rabbit mesenteric veins; contribution of endothelium and attenuation by volatile anesthetics. Anesthesiology 1995; 82:550-8.
Smith EE, Crowell JW: Influence of hypoxia on mean circulatory pressure and cardiac output. Am J Physiol 1967; 212:1067-9.
Zimpfer M, Sit SP, Vatner SF: Effects of anesthesia on the canine carotid chemoreceptor reflex. Circulation Res 1981; 48:400-6.
Daly MB, Scott MJ: The cardiovascular responses to stimulation of the carotid body chemoreceptors in the dog. J Physiol 1963; 165:179-97.
Crystal GJ, Saye TD, Bedran de Castro MTB: Effect of controlled ventilation on renal and splanchnic blood flows during severe arterial hypoxia. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1986; 182:461-7.
Stekiel TA, Ozono K, McCallum JB, Bosnjak ZJ, Stekiel WJ, Kampine JP: The inhibitory action of halothane on reflex constriction in mesenteric capacitance veins. Anesthesiology 1990; 73:1169-78.
Stekiel TA, Tominaga M, Bosnjak ZJ, Kampine JP: The inhibitory action of halothane on mesenteric venoconstriction and related reflex responses during acute graded hypoxia in rabbits. Anesthesiology 1992; 77:709-20.
Figure 1. Protocol for presentation of FIO2of 0%, bilateral carotid occlusion, and FIO2of 11%, before epidural or intramuscular lidocaine administration and four times later.
Figure 1. Protocol for presentation of FIO2of 0%, bilateral carotid occlusion, and FIO2of 11%, before epidural or intramuscular lidocaine administration and four times later.
Figure 1. Protocol for presentation of FIO2of 0%, bilateral carotid occlusion, and FIO2of 11%, before epidural or intramuscular lidocaine administration and four times later.
×
Figure 2. Sample tracings of heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), vein diameter (VD), averaged sympathetic efferent nerve activity (AVG SENA), and raw SENA, during FIO2of 0%, bilateral carotid occlusion (BCO), and FIO2of 11%. Before epidural lidocaine (arrow), FIO2of 0% produces bradycardia and mild hypertension, accompanied by marked elevation in SENA and venoconstriction. Marked decrease of SENA after FIO2of 0% is a consistent feature after intense sympathetic stimulation. Hypertension, slight tachycardia, sympathetic activation, and venoconstriction are induced by BCO. FIO2of 11% results in hypertension and venoconstriction despite minimal sympathetic activation. One minute after epidural lidocaine injection, hypotension and venodilation are evident and SENA is almost eliminated, at which time FIO2of 0% still produces bradycardia, sympathetic activation, and venoconstriction but with hypotension. During epidural anesthesia, FIO2of 11% causes bradycardia and hypotension.
Figure 2. Sample tracings of heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), vein diameter (VD), averaged sympathetic efferent nerve activity (AVG SENA), and raw SENA, during FIO2of 0%, bilateral carotid occlusion (BCO), and FIO2of 11%. Before epidural lidocaine (arrow), FIO2of 0% produces bradycardia and mild hypertension, accompanied by marked elevation in SENA and venoconstriction. Marked decrease of SENA after FIO2of 0% is a consistent feature after intense sympathetic stimulation. Hypertension, slight tachycardia, sympathetic activation, and venoconstriction are induced by BCO. FIO2of 11% results in hypertension and venoconstriction despite minimal sympathetic activation. One minute after epidural lidocaine injection, hypotension and venodilation are evident and SENA is almost eliminated, at which time FIO2of 0% still produces bradycardia, sympathetic activation, and venoconstriction but with hypotension. During epidural anesthesia, FIO2of 11% causes bradycardia and hypotension.
Figure 2. Sample tracings of heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), vein diameter (VD), averaged sympathetic efferent nerve activity (AVG SENA), and raw SENA, during FIO2of 0%, bilateral carotid occlusion (BCO), and FIO2of 11%. Before epidural lidocaine (arrow), FIO2of 0% produces bradycardia and mild hypertension, accompanied by marked elevation in SENA and venoconstriction. Marked decrease of SENA after FIO2of 0% is a consistent feature after intense sympathetic stimulation. Hypertension, slight tachycardia, sympathetic activation, and venoconstriction are induced by BCO. FIO2of 11% results in hypertension and venoconstriction despite minimal sympathetic activation. One minute after epidural lidocaine injection, hypotension and venodilation are evident and SENA is almost eliminated, at which time FIO2of 0% still produces bradycardia, sympathetic activation, and venoconstriction but with hypotension. During epidural anesthesia, FIO2of 11% causes bradycardia and hypotension.
×
Figure 3. Changes in heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), sympathetic efferent nerve activity (SENA), and vein diameter (VD) produced by bilateral carotid occlusion (BCO) before and four times after epidural or intramuscular injection of lidocaine (arrow and dotted line). Each pair of data points connected by a line represent the initial value immediately before BCO and the value during BCO. Baseline for SENA and VD are values just before injection. Values are means +/- SE. *Significant change. (section)Significant difference between changes in epidural and intramuscular groups.
Figure 3. Changes in heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), sympathetic efferent nerve activity (SENA), and vein diameter (VD) produced by bilateral carotid occlusion (BCO) before and four times after epidural or intramuscular injection of lidocaine (arrow and dotted line). Each pair of data points connected by a line represent the initial value immediately before BCO and the value during BCO. Baseline for SENA and VD are values just before injection. Values are means +/- SE. *Significant change. (section)Significant difference between changes in epidural and intramuscular groups.
Figure 3. Changes in heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), sympathetic efferent nerve activity (SENA), and vein diameter (VD) produced by bilateral carotid occlusion (BCO) before and four times after epidural or intramuscular injection of lidocaine (arrow and dotted line). Each pair of data points connected by a line represent the initial value immediately before BCO and the value during BCO. Baseline for SENA and VD are values just before injection. Values are means +/- SE. *Significant change. (section)Significant difference between changes in epidural and intramuscular groups.
×
Figure 4. Changes produced by FIO2of 0%. The symbols are the same as those in Figure 3.
Figure 4. Changes produced by FIO2of 0%. The symbols are the same as those in Figure 3.
Figure 4. Changes produced by FIO2of 0%. The symbols are the same as those in Figure 3.
×
Figure 5. Changes produced by FIO2of 11%. The symbols are the same as those in Figure 3.
Figure 5. Changes produced by FIO2of 11%. The symbols are the same as those in Figure 3.
Figure 5. Changes produced by FIO2of 11%. The symbols are the same as those in Figure 3.
×