Free
Case Reports  |   November 1997
Succinylcholine Resistance in a Patient with Juvenile Hyaline Fibromatosis 
Author Notes
  • (Baraka) Professor and Chairman.
  • Received from the Department of Anesthesiology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. Submitted for publication March 4, 1997. Accepted for publication June 26, 1997.
  • Address reprint requests to Dr. Baraka: Professor and Chairman, Department of Anesthesiology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. Address electronic mail to: abaraka@aub.edu.lb.
Article Information
Case Reports
Case Reports   |   November 1997
Succinylcholine Resistance in a Patient with Juvenile Hyaline Fibromatosis 
Anesthesiology 11 1997, Vol.87, 1250-1252. doi:
Anesthesiology 11 1997, Vol.87, 1250-1252. doi:
Succinylcholine resistance is a rare phenomenon that may occur in patients with increased plasma cholinesterase [1–3 ] or in myasthenic patients. [4–6 ] The present report describes resistance to succinylcholine in a patient with juvenile hyaline fibromatosis (JHF), [7,8 ] who had normal cholinesterase values and normal neurologic and neuromuscular functions.
Case Report 
A 47-yr-old man, 84 kg, who suffered since childhood from multiple soft-tissue masses, up to 5 cm in diameter and scattered all over the body presented. Histopathology after excisional biopsy revealed darkly stained fibroblasts scattered in hyalinized tissue. The case was diagnosed as JHF.
The patient was operated on in our institution at least 10 times during the past 40 yr for excision of the JHF nodules. Originally, general anesthesia was inhalational N20:02supplemented either by ether or by halothane. When succinylcholine was introduced into our practice, anesthesia was induced with thiopental followed by succinylcholine. However, succinylcholine administration was always followed by inadequate jaw relaxation, despite the administration of repeated doses. The patient was labeled as resistant to succinylcholine.
In the present hospital admission, the patient was scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Review of his old chart disclosed several anesthesia notes referring to resistance of the patient to succinylcholine. Preoperative analysis of the plasma cholinesterase activity, using benzoylcholine as a substrate, showed normal values. The plasma cholinesterase was 3.84 U/ml (normal values, 4.65–12.2 U/ml), dibucaine number was 87.3%, and fluoride number was 74.6%. Neurologic examination, nerve conduction studies, and electromyography did not detect any abnormalities.
The patient was premedicated with promethazine, 25 mg, meperidine, 75 mg, and atropine, 0.6 mg. Before induction of anesthesia and throughout surgery, neuromuscular transmission was monitored by Datex[registered sign](Helsinki, Finland) electromyography. The ulnar nerve was stimulated supramaximally (train-of-four) at the wrist every 20 s while displaying the resulting integrated electromyographic response of the adductor pollicis muscle. The patient was monitored continuously during anesthesia by electrocardiography (ECG), pulse optometry, end-tidal capnography, esophageal temperature probe, and by noninvasive blood pressure monitor. After induction of anesthesia with thiopental, 5 mg/kg, succinylcholine, 1.5 mg/kg, was administered. Succinylcholine administration was not followed by muscle fasciculations and produced only a partial and transient neuromuscular block at the adductor pollicis (Figure 1). The mouth could not be opened, and laryngoscopy was impossible. However, the patient's lungs could be ventilated by a face mask. Rocuronium, 0.6 mg/kg, was administered intravenously and was rapidly followed by complete jaw relaxation and by complete neuromuscular block of the adductor pollicis muscle (Figure 1). Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation could be easily achieved, and anesthesia was maintained with N20:02supplemented by fentanyl. Recovery of T4:T1ratio to 10% was observed after 40 min. Throughout this period, ECG was normal, SPO2> 97%, end-tidal PCO230–35 mmHg, and esophageal temperature was 36.5 [degree sign] Celsius. Also, blood gases and electrolytes were within the normal values.
Figure 1. Electromyographic response of the adductor pollicis muscle to train-of-four stimulation of the ulnar nerve. Succinylcholine, 1.5 mg/kg, resulted in about 50% neuromuscular block. After recovery, rocuronium, 0.6 mg/kg, resulted in rapid and complete neuromuscular block.
Figure 1. Electromyographic response of the adductor pollicis muscle to train-of-four stimulation of the ulnar nerve. Succinylcholine, 1.5 mg/kg, resulted in about 50% neuromuscular block. After recovery, rocuronium, 0.6 mg/kg, resulted in rapid and complete neuromuscular block.
Figure 1. Electromyographic response of the adductor pollicis muscle to train-of-four stimulation of the ulnar nerve. Succinylcholine, 1.5 mg/kg, resulted in about 50% neuromuscular block. After recovery, rocuronium, 0.6 mg/kg, resulted in rapid and complete neuromuscular block.
×
Discussion 
Juvenile hyaline fibromatosis is a rare syndrome characterized by onset in early life and the presence of numerous dermal and subcutaneous nodules with unique histologic features. The patient may also have hypertrophic gingivae, osteolytic bone lesions, and stunted growth, with normal mental development. [7,8 ] Since childhood, our patient had JHF nodules scattered all over his body. During his last anesthetic and during his previous anesthetics, succinylcholine did not produce adequate muscle relaxation, despite adequate dose administration. The fact that this man had a history of inadequate muscle relaxation after succinylcholine, had normal plasma cholinesterase levels, had normal neurologic and neuromuscular functions, and had only 50% twitch depression of the adductor pollicis muscle suggests the diagnosis of the unusual phenomenon of succinylcholine resistance.
Resistance to succinylcholine may have a pharmacokinetic basis. The drug is rapidly hydrolyzed by the plasma cholinesterase. [1 ] Thus, an increase in the cholinesterase activity, [1–3 ] whether inherited (C5isoenzyme variant) or acquired, may decrease the response to succinylcholine. In obese patients, there is an increase of plasma cholinesterase that is matched by an increase in extracellular fluid, so that succinylcholine requirements may increase. [3 ] Our patient had a normal plasma cholinesterase activity and normal dibucaine and fluoride activity. However, a recent report by Jensen et al. has pointed out that many of the alleles of the gene for plasma cholinesterase cannot be detected by the usual imbibition studies of catalytic activity and require techniques of molecular biology to identify. [9 ] Resistance to succinylcholine also may be a result of pharmacodynamic causes as observed in experimental myasthenia [10 ] and in clinical myasthenia gravis. [4–6 ] In myasthenia, there is a decrease in the functional acetylcholine endplate receptors, with a consequent decrease in the response to the chemical transmitter acetylcholine an to other depolarizing agents such as succinylcholine. [6,11 ](The ED50and ED95in myasthenic patients are 2.0 and 2.6 times normal, respectively. [5 ] However, our patient did not show clinically or by nerve conduction studies and electromyography any neurologic or neuromuscular disorder that may “down-regulate”[11 ] the endplate receptors.
Resistance to succinylcholine has also been attributed to species variations. [12,13 ] In a previous report, we have shown in the isolated phrenic nerve-diaphragm of different species, that the rat preparation is extremely resistant to succinylcholine and sensitive to d-tubocurarine compared with the cat. [13 ] The resistance of our patient to succinylcholine and his relative sensitively to rocuronium may simulate the response in the rat species. However, previous reports of JHF have shown a normal response to muscle relaxants. [14,15 ]
In conclusion, the present report describes the occurrence of unusual succinylcholine resistance in a patient with JHF. The patient had normal plasma cholinesterase activity and normal neurologic and neuromuscular functions.
References 
References 
Whittaker M: Plasma cholinesterase variants and the anaesthetist. Anaesthesia 1980; 35:174-7.
Sugmari T: Shortened action of succinylcholine in individuals with cholinesterase Cs isoenzyme. Can Anaesth Soc J 1986; 33:321-7.
Bentley JB, Borel JD, Vaughan RW, Gandolfi AJ: Weight, pseudochlinesterase activity, and succinylcholine requirements. Anesthesiology 1982; 57:48-9.
Baraka A, Afifi A, Muallem M, Kachachi T, Frayha F: Neuromuscular effects of halothane, suxamethonium and tubocurarine in a myasthenic undergoing thymectomy. Br J Anaesth 1971; 43:91-4.
Eisenkraft JB, Book WJ, Mann SM, Papatestas A, Hubbard M: Resistance to succinylcholine in myasthenia gravis: A dose-response study. Anesthesiology 1988; 69:760-3.
Baraka A: Anaesthesia and myasthenia gravis. Can J Anaesth 1992; 39:476-86.
Quintal D: Juvenile hyaline fibromatosis. Arch Dermatol 1985; 121:1062-3.
Fayad MN, Yaoub A, Salman S, Khudr A, Derkaloustian VM: Juvenile hyaline fibromatosis: two new patients and review of the literature. Am J Med Genetics 1987; 26:123-31.
Jensen FS, Skovgaard LT, Viby-Mogensen: Identification of human plasma cholinesterase variants in 6688 individuals using biochemical analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Sand 1995; 39:157-62.
Johnson BR, Kim YJ, Sanders DB: Neuromuscular blocking properties of suxamethonium and decomethonium in normal and myasthenic rat muscle. J Neurolog Sci 1983; 59:431-40.
Martyn JAJ, White DA, Gronert GA, Jaffe RS, Ward JM: Up-and-down regulation of skeletal muscle acetylcholine receptors. Effects of neuromuscular block. Anesthesiology 1992; 76:822-43.
Zaimis E: Motor end-plate differences as a determinary factor in the mode of action of neuromuscular blocking substances. J Physiol 1953; 122:238-51.
Baraka A: Neuromuscular block in different species. Acta Anaesth Scand 1972; 16:132-9.
Norman B, Soni N, Madden N: Anaesthesia and juvenile hyaline fibromatosis. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76:163-6.
Sugahara S, Iskezaki W, Abe K, Ogawa R: Anaesthetic management of a patient with juvenile hyaline fibromatosis: A case report. Masui (Japenese Journal of Anesthesiology) 1993; 42:1853-5.
Figure 1. Electromyographic response of the adductor pollicis muscle to train-of-four stimulation of the ulnar nerve. Succinylcholine, 1.5 mg/kg, resulted in about 50% neuromuscular block. After recovery, rocuronium, 0.6 mg/kg, resulted in rapid and complete neuromuscular block.
Figure 1. Electromyographic response of the adductor pollicis muscle to train-of-four stimulation of the ulnar nerve. Succinylcholine, 1.5 mg/kg, resulted in about 50% neuromuscular block. After recovery, rocuronium, 0.6 mg/kg, resulted in rapid and complete neuromuscular block.
Figure 1. Electromyographic response of the adductor pollicis muscle to train-of-four stimulation of the ulnar nerve. Succinylcholine, 1.5 mg/kg, resulted in about 50% neuromuscular block. After recovery, rocuronium, 0.6 mg/kg, resulted in rapid and complete neuromuscular block.
×