Free
Meeting Abstracts  |   April 1998
Effects of Volatile Anesthetic Agents on In Situ Vascular Smooth Muscle Transmembrane Potential in Resistance- and Capacitance-regulating Blood Vessels 
Author Notes
  • (Yamazaki) Associate Professor of Anesthesiology.
  • (Stekiel, T. A.) Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology.
  • (Bosnjak) Professor of Anesthesiology and Physiology.
  • (Kampine) Professor and Chair, Department of Anesthesiology; Professor, Department of Physiology.
  • (Stekiel, W. J.) Professor of Physiology.
Article Information
Meeting Abstracts   |   April 1998
Effects of Volatile Anesthetic Agents on In Situ Vascular Smooth Muscle Transmembrane Potential in Resistance- and Capacitance-regulating Blood Vessels 
Anesthesiology 4 1998, Vol.88, 1085-1095. doi:
Anesthesiology 4 1998, Vol.88, 1085-1095. doi:
VOLATILE anesthetic agents cause peripheral vasodilation and hypotension, part of which is due to a reduction in both arterial and venous vascular smooth muscle (VSM) contractile force (i.e., VSM tone). [1] It is not clear, however, which of the cellular structures and many control mechanisms shown to modulate VSM tone in vitro are most affected by volatile anesthetic agents in vivo. Long-standing evidence from in situ and in vitro studies suggests that a primary mechanism for anesthetically induced inhibition of VSM tone is an attenuation of both central and peripheral neural excitatory activity and, in particular, the release of excitatory neurotransmitters from efferent sympathetic nerve terminals. [2–8] With increasing knowledge of the molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of VSM contractile force, however, more recent in vitro studies indicate that volatile anesthetic agents also can attenuate both neurally and nonneurally mediated excitatory control of VSM tone through an action at the level of VSM cell membrane receptors, ion channels, intracellular second messenger systems, intracellular free calcium [Ca2+]iand the contractile proteins themselves. [7,9–14] Relative to their action on endothelial regulation of VSM tone, volatile anesthetic agents have been reported to enhance [15,16] and to inhibit [17,18] the synthesis or action of nitric oxide or other vasodilatory agents generated by the vascular endothelium.
Because the physical properties of volatile anesthetic agents readily enable them to cross membrane structures, [19] it is not surprising that some type of anesthetically induced inhibition or facilitation has been demonstrated for nearly every mechanism described here, participating in control of VSM tone. Because most mechanistic studies have used isolated in vitro preparations, however, it is not clear which mechanisms participating in control of VSM tone are most significantly affected by inhaled anesthetic agents in vivo.
We hypothesize that clinically relevant in situ concentrations of volatile anesthetic agents exert an approximately equal inhibitory effect on both sympathetic and nonneural control of VSM tone in resistance- and capacitance-regulating blood vessels and that such inhibition is coupled to VSM hyperpolarization. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to measure VSM transmembrane potentials in situ to assess indirectly the relative importance of the inhibitory effects of three inhalational volatile anesthetic agents (halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane) on regulation of VSM tone in vivo in neurally intact versus denervated blood vessel preparations.
Methods
Experimental Preparations
One hundred two male Sprague-Dawley rats (250–300 g body weight) were studied (after approval of the study by the Animal Care Committee at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI). The animals were sedated with ketamine (40 mg/kg) given intraperitoneally to facilitate measurement of weight and initial preparation. Subsequently, anesthesia was induced with 20 mg/kg pentobarbital given intraperitoneally followed by a 10-mg/kg intravenous bolus dose at [nearly =] 1-h intervals throughout the course of each experimental protocol. Surgical preparation included femoral venous and arterial cannulation for infusion of medication and direct measurement of arterial blood pressure, respectively. In addition, a tracheostomy tube was placed, and ventilation was controlled with a Model 680 rodent respirator (Harvard Apparatus Co., South Natick, MA) to maintain end-tidal CO2between 30 and 40 mmHg.
The animal was placed on a movable microscope stage, which was resting on a Micro-g vibration-free table (Technical Mfg. Co., Woburn, MA). A midline laparotomy was performed, and a loop of terminal ileum with its attached mesentery was externalized to expose paired small (200 micro meter OD) mesenteric arteries and (300 micro meter OD) veins. These vessels were carefully cleared of perivascular fat without disturbing luminal blood flow or perivascular innervation. Surrounding connective tissue was anchored to the Silastic rubber floor of a temperature-regulated tissue chamber that was part of the animal platform via short (75 and 125 micro meter in diameter) stainless steel pins. The vessel preparation was continuously superfused with physiologic salt solution composed of (in mM): NaCl 119, KCl 4.7, MgSO sub 4 1.17, CaCl21.6, NaHCO324.0, NaH2PO41.18, and ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid 0.026. The physiologic salt solution was aerated with a gas mixture of N2, O2, and CO2to maintain pH between 7.35 and 7.45, PCO2between 35 and 45 mmHg, and PO2between 75 and 140 mmHg.
Measurements of VSM Transmembrane Potential (E sub m)
A row of smaller diameter (50 micro meter) stainless steel pins was placed immediately alongside each artery and vein in the dissected mesentery to separate and stabilize them. This served to minimize arterial pulsations and respiratory movements that prevented acquisition of stable Emmeasurements. Single cell in situ Emvalues were measured by manually advancing glass micropipettes filled with 3 M KCl into VSM cells from the adventitial side of the vessel using a hydraulic micromanipulator (Trent Wells Inc., Coulterville, CA). Micropipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass with a Model P-97 Brown-Flaming micropipette puller (Sutter Instruments Co., Novato, CA). Microelectrode tip impedances ranged between 40 and 60 megohms.
In half of the experiments, sympathetic innervation to the vessel preparation was eliminated at the neuromuscular junction by destruction of norepinephrine-containing vesicles within the presynaptic terminal. This was accomplished by local superfusion with 300 micro gram/ml 6-hydroxydopamine for 20 min before measurements of Emfollowed by a 1-h washout period with physiologic salt solution. [20] Before administration of 6-hydroxydopamine, the vessel preparation was super-fused with physiologic salt solution containing 10 sup -6 M phentolamine for 5 min to block the effect of catecholamines released by the treatment with 6-hydroxydopamine. [21,22] 
For each experimental preparation, Emwas measured in the artery and vein together with blood pressure initially just before inhalation of volatile anesthetic agent. Measurements were then repeated after a 15-min inhalational equilibration period with either halothane, isoflurane, or sevoflurane at a minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of 0.5 or 1.0 and again after a 15- to 30-min washout period during which the concentration of anesthetic agent in blood became negligible. Values at 1 MAC were 1.0% and 1.5% for halothane and isoflurane, respectively, [23] and 2.8% for sevoflurane. [24] A single experiment consisted of sequential arterial and venous measurements of Emand blood pressure using an individual animal preparation subjected to the three-step protocol (preanesthetic period, anesthetic period, and washout period). Measurements were made using either 0.5 or 1.0 MAC inhaled volatile anesthetic agent in either a neurally intact or locally denervated vessel preparation. Therefore, the total study consisted of 12 experimental groups. A second series of measurements made during each of the two experimental conditions (intact and denervated vessels) served as time controls. The time course of the three-step protocol for measurements of Emwas the same as in the first series of measurements; however, no volatile anesthetic agent was administered during the anesthesia step. These time controls served to evaluate the stability of the experimental preparation during the course of each experimental protocol.
Inhalational Administration of Anesthetic Agent
In all experiments, animals breathed an O2/N2mixture to keep inspired oxygen concentration at 30%. Halothane and sevoflurane were administered via selective Draeger vaporizers (North American Draeger Co., Telford, PA). Isoflurane was administered via an Ohio Medical Products vaporizer (Airco Inc., Madison, WI). Verification of inhaled concentrations of anesthetic and end-tidal CO2was made with a POET II infrared capnograph and end tidal agent monitor (Criticare Systems Inc., Waukesha, WI). In addition, in each experiment concentrations of anesthetic agent in blood were measured from samples taken immediately before and at the end of the washout period using a Sigma Model 38 gas chromatograph (Perkins-Elmer Co., Norwalk, CT).
Statistical Analysis
For the artery and the vein in each experimental vessel/animal preparation, the recorded Emvalue during each of the three protocol steps is the numerical average of 5–10 sequential single VSM cell impalements (each 6–10 s long). The typical range of Emmeasurements for this sequence of cell impalements in a single vessel was 10 mV during each of the three protocol steps. The mean SE for this sequence in each of the three steps in the protocol (i.e., preanesthetic and post-anesthetic periods), calculated using the replicate number of vessel/animal preparations, ranged between 0.7 and 2.0 mV. This SE was not consistently larger during the volatile anesthetic inhalation step in each protocol. Each Emvalue recorded in the data tables is the mean +/- SD of these numerical average values, with a replication factor ranging from 6–13 for individual protocols. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed on the means of the average Emvalues measured during each experimental condition using the preanesthetic control and the anesthetic and the postanesthetic periods as the repeat factor (Table 1and Table 2). An analysis of variance without repeated measures was used to compare the mean hyperpolarization response of a vessel type (i.e., change in Emvalues in Table 3) with each anesthetic agent during a specific experimental condition (e.g., anesthetic type and dose, presence or absence of local innervation). One-group t tests were used to determine which anesthetically induced hyperpolarization responses were significantly different from zero.
Table 1. Effect of Inhalational Anesthetics on Emof In Situ Mesenteric Arterial VSM 
Image not available
Table 1. Effect of Inhalational Anesthetics on Emof In Situ Mesenteric Arterial VSM 
×
Table 2. Effect of Inhalational Anesthetics on Emof In Situ Mesenteric Venous VSM 
Image not available
Table 2. Effect of Inhalational Anesthetics on Emof In Situ Mesenteric Venous VSM 
×
Table 3. Hyperpolarization Responses of In Situ Small Mesenteric Artery and Vein VSM by Inhalational Anesthetics 
Image not available
Table 3. Hyperpolarization Responses of In Situ Small Mesenteric Artery and Vein VSM by Inhalational Anesthetics 
×
All analyses of variance were calculated using the super ANOVA program (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). The significance of differences between mean values was determined by comparing calculated least-squares means at a significance level of P <or= to 0.05. The t tests of the change in Emvalues were calculated using the Stat-View program (Abacus Concepts).
Results
Results are presented as the mean +/- SD unless otherwise indicated.
Mean Transmembrane Potential Values before, during, and after Inhalation of Volatile Anesthetic Agents
(Figure 1) illustrates representative examples of individual in situ Emrecordings from VSM cells in a small mesenteric artery and vein respectively, before, during, and after inhalation of 1.0 MAC sevoflurane. Similar Emrecordings were obtained with the other two anesthetic agents during the various experimental conditions. Mean arterial blood pressure MAP (not illustrated) was measured simultaneously with Emin each animal.
Figure 1. Examples of sequential in situ vascular smooth muscle transmembrane potential recordings from a small mesenteric artery (top) and vein (bottom) made in the same experimental preparation before (Pre), during (2.8% sevo), and after (post) inhalation of 1.0 MAC sevoflurane, illustrating the hyperpolarization in response to the anesthetic agent.
Figure 1. Examples of sequential in situ vascular smooth muscle transmembrane potential recordings from a small mesenteric artery (top) and vein (bottom) made in the same experimental preparation before (Pre), during (2.8% sevo), and after (post) inhalation of 1.0 MAC sevoflurane, illustrating the hyperpolarization in response to the anesthetic agent.
Figure 1. Examples of sequential in situ vascular smooth muscle transmembrane potential recordings from a small mesenteric artery (top) and vein (bottom) made in the same experimental preparation before (Pre), during (2.8% sevo), and after (post) inhalation of 1.0 MAC sevoflurane, illustrating the hyperpolarization in response to the anesthetic agent.
×
(Table 1and Table 2) list mean VSM Emvalues in the in situ small mesenteric artery and vein, before, during, and after inhalation of 0.5 and 1.0 MAC halothane, isoflurane, or sevoflurane. The combined mean VSM Emvalues for all experimental groups before inhalation of any volatile agent were 39 +/- 2.8 and 43 +/- 4.6 mV for the innervated artery and vein, respectively (n = 50), and 41 +/- 4.1 and 44 +/- 5.3 mV for the denervated artery and vein, respectively (n = 44). In the artery (Table 1), mean VSM Emvalues were significantly more negative relative to preanesthetic levels during inhalation of 1.0 MAC (but not 0.5 MAC) of each of the three anesthetic agents, indicating hyperpolarization of VSM. This was true for both the innervated and locally denervated small mesenteric artery. After washout of the 1.0 MAC volatile anesthetic agent, the mean VSM Emvalues were not significantly different from preanesthetic levels (except in the 1.0 MAC sevoflurane denervated artery protocol). In the innervated vein (Table 2), mean VSM Emvalues also were more negative relative to preanesthetic levels during inhalation of 1.0 MAC of each of the three anesthetic agents and during inhalation of 0.5 MAC of halothane and sevoflurane. In the denervated vein, mean VSM Emvalues were significantly more negative relative to preanesthetic levels only during inhalation of 1.0 MAC halothane. Similar to the small artery, postanesthetic venous VSM Emvalues were not significantly different from preanesthetic levels.
Hyperpolarization (Change in Transmembrane Potential) Responses to Inhaled Anesthetic Agents in Mesenteric Vessels with Intact Sympathetic Innervation
To evaluate the effect of volatile anesthetic agents on in situ VSM Emvalues more reliably in the innervated versus denervated vessel preparation, the mean hyperpolarization (i.e., change in Em) responses were compared for each agent (Table 3). The enhanced reliability of such comparisons results from the use of each vessel preparation as its own preanesthetic control. This eliminates the variability inherent in mean VSM Emvalues attributable to factors such as surgical preparation and small variations in local environment (e.g., temperature, blood and superfusate respiratory gas concentrations, levels of basal anesthetic agent in tissue). Table 3illustrates that inhalation of 1.0 MAC halothane, isoflurane, or sevoflurane caused a significant hyperpolarization of both arterial and venous VSM. For both vessel types, isoflurane-induced hyperpolarization was less than that produced by halothane or sevoflurane. At 0.5 MAC, the respective hyperpolarization response of VSM in both types of innervated vessel to each of the three anesthetic agents was less than at 1.0 MAC and, in most cases, not significantly different from zero (Table 3).
Hyperpolarization (Change in Transmembrane Potential) Responses to Inhaled Anesthetic Agents in Sympathetically Denervated Mesenteric Vessels
(Table 3) also illustrates that inhalation of 1.0 MAC halothane, isoflurane, or sevoflurane still caused significant hyperpolarization of both arterial and venous VSM in denervated vessels (except for the insignificant venous VSM hyperpolarization response to sevoflurane). In addition, except for the venous response to 1.0 MAC halothane and isoflurane, the hyperpolarization in the denervated vessel was significantly less (by [nearly =] 50% or more) relative to the response in the innervated vessel. At 0.5 MAC, the VSM hyperpolarization response of denervated artery or vein to each type of anesthetic agent was variable and significantly different from zero only for the venous VSM response to isoflurane and sevoflurane.
Mean Transmembrane Potential Values during Time Control Measurements
(Table 4) illustrates mean Emtime control measurements made in the innervated and denervated artery and vein. No significant hyperpolarization was observed over the period during which the volatile agent would have been inhaled (simulated anesthetic period) or after its washout (postanesthetic period). A small depolarization was observed in the denervated artery during the simulated anesthetic period.
Table 4. Time Control Measurements of VSM Emin Innervated Small Mesenteric Artery and Vein during Simulated Anesthesia 
Image not available
Table 4. Time Control Measurements of VSM Emin Innervated Small Mesenteric Artery and Vein during Simulated Anesthesia 
×
Changes in Mean Arterial Blood Pressure
Inhalation of each of the three volatile anesthetic agents significantly decreased MAP at the 0.5 and 1.0 MAC concentrations to values ranging from 43–82% of respective preanesthetic controls (Table 5). The mean MAP was reduced to 76% of preanesthetic control when averaged for the innervated and locally denervated experimental groups during inhalation of 0.5 MAC halothane. During inhalation of 1.0 MAC halothane, the MAP was reduced to 46% of preanesthetic control level when averaged for the same two groups. Such dose dependency was not evident, however, for the MAP values that resulted from administration of 0.5 and 1.0 MAC isoflurane (averages 74% and 77% of preanesthetic control, respectively) or 0.5 and 1.0 MAC sevoflurane (averages 78% and 86% of preanesthetic control, respectively). Recovery of MAP was not complete during the postanesthesia period after inhalation of 0.5 and 1.0 MAC halothane (ranging from 69–82% of respective preanesthetic controls for the four experimental groups). A similar incomplete recovery of MAP was observed during the postanesthesia period after inhalation of 0.5 and 1.0 MAC sevoflurane (ranging from 73–86% of respective preanesthetic controls for the four experimental groups). Such incomplete recovery of MAP was observed despite essentially complete elimination of each volatile anesthetic agent during the postanesthetic washout period (Table 6). Recovery was complete for three of the four experimental groups during the post-anesthesia period after inhalation of 0.5 and 1.0 MAC isoflurane. Mean arterial pressure did not vary significantly during the time control protocol.
Table 5. Mean Arterial Blood Pressure Measurements 
Image not available
Table 5. Mean Arterial Blood Pressure Measurements 
×
Table 6. Measured Concentrations of Volatile Anesthetics in Blood 
Image not available
Table 6. Measured Concentrations of Volatile Anesthetics in Blood 
×
Discussion
The significant VSM hyperpolarization measured in situ at 1.0 MAC of each inhaled volatile anesthetic agent in the small resistance- and capacitance-regulating mesenteric blood vessels can be expected to be coupled to a decrease in active VSM tone leading to vasodilation [25–28] and a resultant decrease in peripheral vascular resistance coupled with an increase in vascular capacitance. Compared with innervated vessels, the respective in situ VSM hyperpolarization produced by 1.0 MAC of each volatile anesthetic agent were significantly less in locally denervated vessels (except for the venous hyperpolarization by halothane or isoflurane;Table 3). Therefore, at 1.0 MAC, each of the three volatile anesthetic agents exerts a significant in situ inhibitory effect on Emand tone both at the level of the sympathetic neuromuscular junction and at the level of the vascular cell or vessel endothelium. This dual effect is particularly evident in the resistance-regulating small arteries. The data from the current study also suggest that, at 1.0 MAC, the hyperpolarizing action of isoflurane is significantly less than that of halothane or sevoflurane. Table 3indicates that, in the innervated small arteries and veins, the VSM hyperpolarization induced by 1.0 MAC isoflurane was significantly less than that induced either by halothane or sevoflurane. In the respective types of denervated vessel, however, such a difference was not evident. In addition, 1.0 MAC halothane and isoflurane produced similar respective VSM hyperpolarization in innervated versus denervated veins. Assuming that a coupling exists between VSM membrane hyperpolarization and reduction of tone, these measurements suggest that halothane and isoflurane increase mesenteric venous capacitance more by inhibition of nonneural (or nonsympathetic neural) mechanisms regulating venous VSM Emand tone. The relatively small anesthetically induced hyperpolarizations in the denervated veins, however, indicate the need for additional studies to establish the validity of this suggestion.
At 0.5 MAC, the in situ hyperpolarization produced by each of the inhaled volatile anesthetic agents was small and not clearly evident in either the intact or denervated vessels. The stability of the vessel preparation and the reliability of in situ VSM Emmeasurements over the time course of each of the protocols were demonstrated by the lack of significant VSM hyperpolarization in the time control groups (Table 4).
A variety of evidence exists to support an attenuation of VSM tone by volatile anesthetic agents through their actions on neural and nonneural regulatory mechanisms. It is well known that these agents can attenuate sympathetic neural control of VSM tone in small arteries and veins through inhibitory actions at both central [29,30] and peripheral [31,32] neural loci. Direct inhibitory effects at the VSM cell level include attenuation of inositol triphosphate-mediated Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum [33,34] and influx of Ca sup 2+ across the sarcolemmal membrane in cultured VSM-like cells. [35] In vitro patch clamp studies indicate that these anesthetic agents can inhibit both inward Ca2+ and outward potassium (K sup +) currents across the sarcolemmal membrane of VSM from canine coronary [36] and cerebral [12] arteries. Current initial studies in our laboratory, however, indicate that in situ hyperpolarization of denervated mesenteric vessels by isoflurane is eliminated by superfusion with specific KCaand KATPchannel blockers, [37] strongly suggesting their activation by the volatile anesthetic agents.
Of central importance to the conclusions reached in this study is the validity of the assumed relationship between the anesthetically induced VSM hyperpolarization and inhibition of VSM tone. The in situ hyperpolarizations induced by volatile anesthetic agents observed in the current study coupled with their reported inhibitory effect on neural and nonneural regulation of VSM tone [29–35] lends support to the relationship between VSM hyperpolarization and reduction of active contractile force (i.e., electromechanical coupling). Substantial evidence indicates that electromechanical coupling occurs over the in vivo physiologic range of VSM Emvalues (approximately -30--50 mV) in a variety of vessels. [25,26,28,38] It is generally recognized that smaller (resistance) arteries are more sensitive to the action of Ca2+ entry blockers than are larger arteries, presumably because the former have smaller intracellular stores of Ca2+ available for excitation-contraction coupling. Hence, regulation of small artery VSM tone is more dependent on influx of extracellular Ca sup 2+, which, in turn, is dependent on Em. Siegel et al. [27,39] have shown that vasoactive agents and changes in physiologic state (e.g., acidosis or hypoxia) that cause VSM hyperpolarization also produce vasodilation. Both are the result of K sup + channel activation and consequent closure of voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels. [39,40] Siegel et al. [39] also have shown that most vasodilators are K sup + channel openers and produce a tight electromechanical coupling (e.g., a 50% relaxation for a 2.5-mV hyperpolarization). It is important to note, however, that inhibition of VSM tone by volatile anesthetic agents also may include actions at regulatory sites that do not affect E sub m (e.g., attenuation of intracellular second messenger enzymatic activity, sensitivity of VSM myosin light chain kinase activation by Ca sup 2+-calmodulin, phosphorylation of VSM myosin [9,11]).
Another controversial question concerning possible nonneural mechanisms of control of VSM Emand tone is the effect of volatile anesthetic agents on production or release of endothelium-derived nitric oxide vasodilator and hyperpolarizing factors from the vascular endothelial cell. In vitro evidence supports an indirectly augmented release of endothelium-derived nitric oxide by volatile anesthetic agents [16] and an inhibition of endothelium-derived nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation via inhibition of its synthesis. [41] Endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor also can be inhibited in vitro by intravenous and volatile anesthetic agents. [42] In the current study, however, volatile anesthetic agents hyperpolarized VSM in situ. Therefore, if they do inhibit endothelium-derived nitric oxide or endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor activity in vivo, [43] it appears that such actions would be subordinate to the more potent anesthetic actions leading to VSM hyperpolarization and vasodilation.
It could be argued that in situ change in blood vessel diameter is a more direct indicator of change in VSM tone (i.e., active contractile force) than VSM Em. Vessel diameter is also a function of intraluminal pressure and passive wall tension, however (as is evident from the La Place relationship). [44] Hence, these variables also must be assessed in situ to establish an accurate relation between VSM tone and vessel diameter. Therefore, we believe that the VSM hyperpolarization induced by volatile anesthetic agents observed in the current study, taken together with the demonstrated tight (and steep) electromechanical coupling in small blood vessels, [25,26,28,38] allows the use of VSM Emmeasurements to assess the effects of volatile anesthetic agents indirectly on in situ regulation of VSM tone.
As has been reported previously, [45,46] in the current study, each of the volatile anesthetic agents significantly reduced MAP. Therefore, the possibility exists that the in situ hyperpolarization induced by volatile anesthetic agents in the small artery is a result, rather than a cause, of the accompanying hypotension produced by these agents (i.e., a myogenic effect [47]), particularly in the absence of local sympathetic innervation. In previous studies, we have measured a slope of 0.05 mV/mmHg intraluminal pressure in in vitro isolated, perfused segments of rat small mesenteric artery (unpublished observations). Thus, a myogenic mechanism may contribute to the hyperpolarization of arterial VSM induced by anesthetic agents. Definitive evidence for such a contribution can be obtained only by correlating a range of in situ intraluminal pressure measurements with VSM Em. Indirect evidence suggests, however, that the myogenic response cannot be the sole cause of the VSM hyperpolarization. In the current study, the arterial and especially the venous hyperpolarization do not consistently correlate with the magnitude of reduction in arterial pressure. In addition, in preliminary studies designed to eliminate systemic hypotension by superfusing in situ mesenteric vessels with a concentration of isoflurane equal to that attained in blood at 1.0 MAC, inhaled (0.65 mM), we have observed VSM hyperpolarizations similar to those reported in Table 3.
As indicated previously, sympathetic denervation was produced by superfusion of the in situ vessels with 6-hydroxydopamine. [20] The data in Table 5indicate that the mean value for MAP before administration of volatile anesthetic agents of the six denervated groups of animals tended to be lower than that of the innervated groups (14 +/- 17 mmHg). A small reduction in MAP may have occurred during the local denervation because of some absorption of 6-hydroxydopamine into the circulation with redistribution to other sympathetic nerve terminals. Other factors, however, also may have contributed to the small reduction in MAP (e.g., longer duration of the experimental protocol for VSM Emmeasurements in denervated vessels).
It should be recognized that the MAC dose designated for each of the volatile anesthetic agents in the current study refer only to inspired concentrations and not to total level of depth of anesthesia. The hyperpolarization induced by volatile anesthetic agents measured in this study were superimposed on any effects that the necessary basal pentobarbital anesthetic agent may have had on background neural activity or the peripheral vasculature. Some early evidence indicates that high concentrations of barbiturates can hyperpolarize VSM in in situ small mesenteric arteries. [48] In the current study in situ, however, VSM Emvalues were measured under a light to moderate level of basal anesthesia. Previous studies have shown that, with similar levels of pentobarbital-induced anesthesia, VSM in the small mesenteric arteries and veins responds to vasoconstrictor agonists with depolarization and to denervation with hyperpolarization. [22,26,49] Thus, although hyperpolarization induced by volatile anesthetic agents may have been attenuated by the basal anesthetic agent in the current study, it was still evident. Finally, it is also important to note that the potential exists for the ketamine used for initial sedation to attenuate hyperpolarization induced by volatile anesthetic agents (e.g., by blocking KATPchannels). [50] This effect should be slight, however, because measurement of Emvalues in each protocol did not begin before a minimum of 2 h after administration of the single ketamine bolus dose.
Inhalation of 1.0 MAC, but not 0.5 MAC, halothane, isoflurane, or sevoflurane produced a consistent and significant in situ hyperpolarization of VSM in small mesenteric arteries and veins. Local sympathetic denervation attenuated the arterial VSM hyperpolarization induced by each volatile anesthetic agent and the venous hyperpolarization induced by sevoflurane. Venous VSM hyperpolarization induced by halothane or isoflurane, however, was not significantly attenuated by local sympathetic denervation, We conclude that at 1.0 MAC these inhaled volatile anesthetic agents attenuate sympathetic neural and nonneural mechanisms involved in the in situ regulation of Emand tone in resistance-regulating arteries. In capacitance-regulating veins in situ, 1.0 MAC halothane and isoflurane primarily attenuate nonneural mechanisms regulating Emand tone.
The authors thank Anita Tredean for her assistance with preparation of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
Longnecker DE, Harris PD: Anesthesia, Microcirculation. Volume 3. Edited by Kaley G, Altura B. Baltimore, University Park Press, 1980, pp 333-69.
Bosnjak ZJ, Seagard JL, Wu A, Kampine JP: The effects of halothane on sympathetic ganglionic transmission. Anesthesiology 1982; 57:473-9.
Kamath GS, Rorie DK, Tyce GM: Altered release and metabolism of norepinephrine in superfused canine saphenous veins in the presence of halothane and hypoxia. Anesthesiology 1993; 78:553-61.
Muldoon SM, Vanhoutte PM, Lorenz RR, Van Dyke RA: Venomotor changes caused by halothane acting on the sympathetic nerves. Anesthesiology 1975; 43:41-8.
Skovsted P, Price ML, Price HL: The effects of halothane on arterial pressure, preganglionic sympathetic activity and barostatic reflexes. Anesthesiology 1969; 31:507-14.
Schmeling WT, Farber NE: Anesthetic actions on cardiovascular control mechanisms in the central nervous system. Adv Pharmacol 1994; 31:617-42.
Stekiel TA, Stekiel WJ, Tominaga M, Stadnicka A, Bosnjak ZJ, Kampine JP: The effect of halothane and isoflurane on in situ diameter responses of small mesenteric veins to acute graded hypercapnia. Anesth Analg 1996; 82:349-57.
Wood M: Effect of general anesthesia on modulation of sympathetic nervous system function. Adv Pharmacol 1994; 31:449-58.
Akata T, Boyle WA III: Volatile anesthetic actions on contractile proteins in membrane-permeabilized small mesenteric arteries. Anesthesiology 1995; 82:700-12.
Bosnjak ZJ: Ion channels in vascular smooth muscle. Anesthesiology 1993; 79:1392-401.
Tsuchida H, Namba H, Seki S, Fujita S, Tanaka S, Namiki A: Role of intracellular Ca sup 2+ pools in the effects of halothane and isoflurane on vascular smooth muscle contraction. Anesth Analg 1994; 78:1067-76.
Eskinder H, Gebremedhin D, Lee JG, Rusch NJ, Supan FD, Kampine JP, Bosnjak ZJ: Halothane and isoflurane decrease the open state probability of K sup + channels in dog cerebral arterial muscle cells. Anesthesiology 1995; 82:479-90.
Marijic J, Madden JA, Kampine JP, Bosnjak ZJ: The effect of halothane on norepinephrine responsiveness in rabbit small mesenteric veins. Anesthesiology 1990; 73:479-84.
Zorn L, Kulkarni R, Anantharam V, Bayley H, Treistman SN: Halothane acts on many potassium channels, including a minimal potassium channel. Neurosci Lett 1993; 161:81-4.
Blaise G, Sill JC, Nugent M, Van Dyke RA, Vanhoutte PM: Isoflur-ane causes endothelium-dependent inhibition of contractile responses of canine coronary arteries. Anesthesiology 1987; 67:513-7.
Wang Y-X, Abdelrahman A, Pang CCY: Selective inhibition of pressor and haemodynamic effects of N sup G -nitro-L-arginine by halothane. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1993; 22:57-8.
Sigmon DH, Florentino-Pineda I, VanDyke RA, Beierwaltes WH: Halothane impairs the hemodynamics of endothelium-derived nitric oxide. Anesthesiology 1995; 82:135-43.
Johns RA: Endothelium, anesthetics, and vascular control. Anesthesiology 1993; 79:1381-91.
Halsey MJ: Molecular interactions of anaesthetics with biological membranes. Gen Pharmacol 1992; 23:1013-6.
Aprigliano O, Hermsmeyer K: In vitro denervation of the portal vein and caudal artery of the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1976; 198:568-77.
Abel PW, Trapani A, Aprigliano O, Hermsmeyer K: Trophic effect of norepinephrine on the rat portal vein in organ culture. Circ Res 1980; 47:770-5.
Stekiel WJ, Contney SJ, Lombard JH: Small vessel membrane potential, sympathetic input, and electrogenic pump rate in SHR. Am J Physiol 1986; 250:C547-C56.
Drummond JC: MAC for halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane in the New Zealand white rabbit and a test for the validity of MAC determinations. Anesthesiology 1985; 62:336-8.
Taheri S, Halsey MJ, Liu J, Eger II EI, Koblin DD, Laster MJ: What solvent best represents the site of action of inhaled anesthetics in humans, rats, and dogs? Anesth Analg 1991; 72:627-34.
Hermsmeyer K, Trapani A, Abel PW: Membrane potential-dependent tension in vascular muscle, Vasodilation. Edited by Vanhoutte PM, Leusen I. New York, Raven Press, 1981, pp 273-84.
Stekiel WJ: Electrophysiological mechanisms of force development by vascular smooth muscle membrane in hypertension, Blood Vessel Changes in Hypertension: Structure and Function. Volume 2. Edited by Lee RMKW. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 1989, pp 127-70.
Siegel G: Vascular smooth muscle, Comprehensive Human Physiology: From Cellular Mechanisms to Integration. Volume 2. Edited by Greger R, Windhorst U. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1996, pp 1941-64.
Nelson MT, Patlak JB, Worley JF, Standen NB: Calcium channels, potassium channels, and voltage dependence of arterial smooth muscle tone. Am J Physiol 1990; 259:C3-C18.
Stekiel TA, Ozono K, McCallum JB, Bosnjak ZJ, Stekiel WJ, Kampine JP: The inhibitory action of halothane on reflex constriction in mesenteric capacitance veins. Anesthesiology 1990; 73:1169-78.
Poterack KA, Kampine JP, Schmeling WT: Effects of isoflurane, midazolam, and etomidate on cardiovascular responses to stimulation of central nervous system pressor sites in chronically instrumented cats. Anesth Analg 1991; 73:64-75.
Boban N, McCallum JB, Schedewie HK, Boban M, Kampine JP, Bosnjak ZJ: Direct comparative effects of isoflurane and desflurane on sympathetic ganglionic transmission. Anesth Analg 1995; 80:127-34.
Rorie DK, Tyce GM, Mackenzie RA: Evidence that halothane inhibits norepinephrine release from sympathetic nerve endings in dog saphenous vein by stimulation of presynaptic inhibitory muscarinic receptors. Anesth Analg 1984; 63:1059-64.
Sill JC, Eskuri S, Nelson R, Tarara J, Van Dyke RA: The volatile anesthetic isoflurane attenuates Ca sup ++ mobilization in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1993; 265:74-80.
Sill JC, Uhl C, Eskuri S, Van Dyke R, Tarara J: Halothane inhibits agonist-induced inositol phosphate and Ca sup 2+ signaling in A7r5 cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. Mol Pharmacol 1991; 40:1006-13.
Iaizzo PA: The effects of halothane and isoflurane on intracellular Ca sup 2+ regulation in cultured cells with characteristics of vascular smooth muscle. Cell Calcium 1992; 13:513-20.
Buljubasic N, Rusch NJ, Marijic J, Kampine JP, Bosnjak ZJ: Effects of halothane and isoflurane on calcium and potassium channel currents in canine coronary artery cells. Anesthesiology 1992; 76:990-8.
Kokita N, Stekiel TA, Bosnjak ZJ, Kampine JP, Stekiel WJ: Effects of isoflurane on potassium channel-mediated vascular smooth muscle transmembrane potential (abstract). Anesthesiology 1997; 87:A529.
Trapani A, Matsuki N, Abel PW, Hermsmeyer K: Norepinephrine produces tension through electromechanical coupling in rabbit ear artery. Eur J Pharmacol 1981; 72:87-91.
Siegel G, Emden J, Wenzel K, Marionneau J, Stock G: Potassium channel activation in vascular smooth muscle. Adv Exp Med Biol 1992; 311:53-72.
Nelson MT, Quayle JM: Physiological roles and properties of potassium channels in arterial smooth muscle. Am J Physiol 1995; 268:C799-C822.
Nakamura K, Terasako K, Toda H, Miyawaki I, Kakuyama M, Nishiwada M, Hatano Y, Mori K: Mechanisms of inhibition of endothelium-dependent relaxation by halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane. Can J Anaesth 1994; 41:340-6.
Lischke V, Busse R, Hecker M: Volatile and intravenous anesthetics selectively attenuate the release of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor elicited by bradykinin in the coronary microcirculation. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 1995; 352:346-9.
Akata T, Nakashima N, Kodama K, Boyle WA III, Takehashi S: Effects of volatile anesthetics on acetylcholine-induced relaxation in the rabbit mesenteric resistance artery. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 188-204.
Stekiel WJ, Meyers K, Monos E, Lombard J: Stretch-dependent tone in small mesenteric and gracilis muscle arteries from spontaneous (SHR) and volume-expended hypertensive rats, Resistance Arteries. Edited by Halpern Wea. New York, Perinatology Press, 1988, pp 342-50.
Morisaki H, Suematsu M, Wakabayashi Y, Morooka S, Fukushima K, Ishimura Y, Takeda J: Leukocyte-endothelium interaction in the rat mesenteric microcirculation during halothane or sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1997; 87:591-8.
Conzen PF, Vollmar B, Habazettl H, Frink EJ, Peter K, Messmer K: Systemic and regional hemodynamics of isoflurane and sevoflurane in rats. Anesth Analg 1992; 74:79-88.
Shepherd AP: Myogenic responses of intestinal resistance and exchange vessels. Am J Physiol 1977; 233:H547-H54.
Steedman WM: Micro-electrode studies on mammalian vascular muscle. J Physiol Lond 1966; 186:382-400.
Stekiel WJ, Contney SJ, Lombard JH: Sympathetic neural control of vascular muscle in reduced renal mass hypertension. Hypertension 1991; 17:1185-91.
Ko SH, Lee SK, Han YJ, Choe H, Kwak YG, Chae SW, Cho KP, Song HS: Blockade of myocardial ATP-sensitive potassium channels by ketamine. Anesthesiology 1997; 87:68-74.
Figure 1. Examples of sequential in situ vascular smooth muscle transmembrane potential recordings from a small mesenteric artery (top) and vein (bottom) made in the same experimental preparation before (Pre), during (2.8% sevo), and after (post) inhalation of 1.0 MAC sevoflurane, illustrating the hyperpolarization in response to the anesthetic agent.
Figure 1. Examples of sequential in situ vascular smooth muscle transmembrane potential recordings from a small mesenteric artery (top) and vein (bottom) made in the same experimental preparation before (Pre), during (2.8% sevo), and after (post) inhalation of 1.0 MAC sevoflurane, illustrating the hyperpolarization in response to the anesthetic agent.
Figure 1. Examples of sequential in situ vascular smooth muscle transmembrane potential recordings from a small mesenteric artery (top) and vein (bottom) made in the same experimental preparation before (Pre), during (2.8% sevo), and after (post) inhalation of 1.0 MAC sevoflurane, illustrating the hyperpolarization in response to the anesthetic agent.
×
Table 1. Effect of Inhalational Anesthetics on Emof In Situ Mesenteric Arterial VSM 
Image not available
Table 1. Effect of Inhalational Anesthetics on Emof In Situ Mesenteric Arterial VSM 
×
Table 2. Effect of Inhalational Anesthetics on Emof In Situ Mesenteric Venous VSM 
Image not available
Table 2. Effect of Inhalational Anesthetics on Emof In Situ Mesenteric Venous VSM 
×
Table 3. Hyperpolarization Responses of In Situ Small Mesenteric Artery and Vein VSM by Inhalational Anesthetics 
Image not available
Table 3. Hyperpolarization Responses of In Situ Small Mesenteric Artery and Vein VSM by Inhalational Anesthetics 
×
Table 4. Time Control Measurements of VSM Emin Innervated Small Mesenteric Artery and Vein during Simulated Anesthesia 
Image not available
Table 4. Time Control Measurements of VSM Emin Innervated Small Mesenteric Artery and Vein during Simulated Anesthesia 
×
Table 5. Mean Arterial Blood Pressure Measurements 
Image not available
Table 5. Mean Arterial Blood Pressure Measurements 
×
Table 6. Measured Concentrations of Volatile Anesthetics in Blood 
Image not available
Table 6. Measured Concentrations of Volatile Anesthetics in Blood 
×