Free
Clinical Science  |   April 1998
Epidural Anesthesia Reduces the Gain and Maximum Intensity of Shivering 
Author Notes
  • (Kim, Ikeda) Research Fellow, Department of Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco.
  • (Sessler) Professor, Department of Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco; Professor, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Clinical Anesthesia and Intensive Care; Director, Outcomes Research[trademark symbol], and Vice-Chair, Department of Anesthesia and General Intensive Care, University of Vienna.
  • (Turakhia) Medical Student, University of California, San Francisco.
  • (Jeffrey) Research Associate, Department of Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco.
Article Information
Clinical Science
Clinical Science   |   April 1998
Epidural Anesthesia Reduces the Gain and Maximum Intensity of Shivering 
Anesthesiology 4 1998, Vol.88, 851-857. doi:
Anesthesiology 4 1998, Vol.88, 851-857. doi:
THERMOREGULATORY shivering can be characterized by its threshold (triggering core temperature), gain (incremental intensity increase with further reduction in core temperature), and maximum intensity. [1] Spinal [2] and epidural [3] anesthesia decrease the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds, possibly by producing a substantial increase in apparent (rather than actual) leg temperature. [3] 
The gain of shivering might be well preserved during regional anesthesia if control mechanisms compensate for lower-body paralysis by augmenting activity of upper-body muscles. In this scenario, feedback systems would recognize that heat production was insufficient to prevent additional hypothermia and proportionately increase upper-body muscular activity. Conversely, gain will be reduced approximately by half if the thermoregulatory system fails to compensate. This is the response that would be expected if upper-body muscular activity was determined by body temperature without regard to actual heat production.
Similarly, it might seem logical that lower-body paralysis will reduce the maximum intensity of shivering during regional anesthesia. However, even during maximum shivering, [4] muscular activity is usually considerably less intense than during exercise. [5] Appropriate regulatory feedback of heat production thus might maintain maximum shivering intensity even during regional anesthesia.
Most physiologists believe that temperature, rather than heat, is the major input to the central thermoregulatory control systems. [6,7] That is, thermoregulatory responses are controlled only by tissue temperature rather than by body heat content or heat flow. However, heat control has its supporters. [8,9] Current thermoregulatory theory is thus insufficiently detailed to predict the effect of regional anesthesia on either aspect of shivering. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that epidural anesthesia reduces the gain and maximum intensity of shivering.
Methods
With approval from the Committee on Human Research at the University of California, San Francisco, and informed consent, we studied seven healthy female volunteers. None was obese, was taking medication, or had a history of thyroid disease, dysautonomia, or Raynaud's syndrome. Women not using hormonal contraceptives were studied during the first 10 days of their menstrual cycles. Morphometric characteristics included height 164 +/- 7 cm, weight 61 +/- 10 kg, and age 27 +/- 5 yr.
Treatment Protocol
Studies started at approximately 8:30 A.M. to minimize circadian changes in body temperature. The volunteers fasted 8 h before each study, and rested supine on a standard operating room table. During the studies, they were minimally clothed and ambient temperature was maintained near 22 [degree sign] Celsius. After standard anesthetic safety monitors were positioned, a 16-gauge catheter was inserted into the superior vena cava via the right internal jugular vein. A 14-French Foley catheter was inserted into the bladder.
On one randomly-chosen day, no anesthesia was given (control). On the other, a catheter was inserted into the epidural space via the L3-L4 interspace. The epidural catheter was then injected with 2 ml of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000. This test dose was followed in 5 minutes by 15–17 ml of 2% mepivacaine (Astra Pharmaceuticals, Westborough, MA) without epinephrine. The initial anesthetic dose was based on the volunteers' heights and calculated to produce a dermatomal level of sensory blockade near T8 bilaterally as determined by loss of cutaneous cold sensation and response to pinprick. If necessary, we injected additional mepivacaine to maintain the target level of sensory blockade.
Induction of epidural anesthesia was preceded by 1 h of active prewarming [10] designed to minimize redistribution hypothermia. [11] Active warming was continued for an additional 20–30 min, as necessary to return the core temperature to preinduction levels. Upper- and lower-body mean skin-surface temperatures were adjusted to 33 [degree sign] Celsius, a typical value, using forced air (Augustine Medical, Eden Prairie, MN) and circulating water (Cincinnati Sub-Zero Products, Cincinnati, OH).
The core was cooled by central-venous administration of lactated Ringer's solution at [nearly =] 3 [degree sign] Celsius. The cooling rate was restricted to <or= to 2 [degree sign] Celsius/h, because such rates do not trigger dynamic thermoregulatory responses. [12] Fluid was typically administered at [nearly =] 10–20 ml/min during the initial portion of the study but increased to [nearly =] 80 ml/min by the end. Cooling ceased when shivering intensity no longer increased, despite a continued decrease in core temperature, or when the volunteer requested it. The cooling period typically lasted 1 h on control days and 2 h with epidural anesthesia.
Measurements
Core temperature was recorded from the tympanic membrane using Mon-a-Therm thermocouples (Mallinckrodt Anesthesiology Products, St. Louis, MO). The aural probes were inserted by volunteers until they felt the thermocouple touch the tympanic membrane; appropriate placement was confirmed when volunteers easily detected a gentle rubbing of the attached wire. The aural canal was occluded with cotton, the probe securely taped in place, and a gauze bandage positioned over the external ear. Mean skin-surface temperature was calculated from measurements at 15 area-weighted sites. [13] Upper- and lower-body skin temperatures were calculated as previously described. [3] Temperatures were recorded at 1-min intervals from thermocouples connected to calibrated Iso-Thermex thermometers (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH) that have an accuracy of 0.1 [degree sign] Celsius and a precision of 0.01 [degree sign] Celsius.
Heart rate was measured continuously using pulse oximetry, and blood pressure was determined oscillometrically at 5-min intervals at the left ankle. Oxygen consumption, as measured by a DeltaTrac metabolic monitor (SensorMedics Corp., Yorba Linda, CA), quantified shivering. The system was used in the canopy mode, with a 40 l/min flow through a plastic “bubble” around the volunteers' heads. Measurements were averaged over 1-min intervals and recorded every minute.
Shivering was also evaluated with electromyography as previously described. [14] Silver-silver chloride monitoring electrodes were positioned to record the electric activity of the right pectoralis, trapezius, lower rectus abdominis (within the blocked region), and the quadriceps femoris after mild skin abrasion and degreasing. The active electrodes were positioned 4 cm apart and oriented in the direction of the muscle fibers. [14] After appropriate amplification (model P511; Grass Instruments, Quincy, MA), the signals were recorded on a thermoelectric printer having a linear resolution to 1,000 Hz (Dash-4; Astro-Med, West Warwick, RI). Signals were also digitized for computer analysis at 500 Hz (models NB-MIO-16H, NB-DMA-2800, and LabVIEW 3.11; National Instruments, Austin, TX), and root-mean square values of 1-min acquisition intervals were computed.
Data Analysis
A sustained increase in oxygen consumption identified the shivering threshold. The maximum intensity of shivering was identified by an oxygen consumption that failed to increase further despite continued reduction in core temperature. The shivering threshold and maximum intensity were determined post hoc by an investigator blinded to treatment and core temperature.
Our primary measure of the systemic (whole-body) gain of shivering was considered to be the average slope of the individual oxygen consumption versus the core temperature regressions. Gains in shivering in the upper body (pectoralis, trapezius) and lower body (rectus abdominis, quadriceps femoris) were similarly determined as the average slopes of the individual integrated electromyographic intensity versus core temperature regressions.
For graphical display purposes, the group response was characterized as previously described. [15] (1) The core temperatures triggering shivering on the control and epidural days were designated thresholds in each volunteer. (2) Oxygen consumption values were calculated relative to the individual threshold temperatures under each condition. Because oxygen consumption measurements were taken at specific time intervals rather than at fixed temperature intervals, available data from each volunteer within 0.25 [degree sign] Celsius core temperature increments were averaged. Subsequently, the population means were calculated from these individual averages. (3) Finally, the average oxygen consumption values for the population were plotted relative to the mean thresholds with and without epidural anesthesia, and the slopes were determined by linear regression.
Hemodynamic responses and ambient temperature on each study day were first averaged within each volunteer, and values between the shivering threshold and maximum shivering intensity were included in this average. The resulting values were averaged among volunteers. Results for the two study days were compared using two-tailed paired t or Wilcoxon tests. Results are presented as mean +/- SD; probability values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
The total volume of 2% mepivacaine administered was 23 +/- 5 ml. Epidural anesthesia produced a sensory block to the level of the T8 +/- 1 dermatome, which remained constant during the cooling period. Maximum shivering intensity could be identified only in four of the seven volunteers because the others requested that the study be discontinued before the maximum was reached. Maximum intensity was thus calculated using the data from only four volunteers; other results are based on data from all seven volunteers. Mean skin temperature, and upper- and lower-body skin temperatures, remained near 33 [degree sign] Celsius throughout the experiments. The total volume of administered Ringer's lactate solution was also similar on the two study days, as were environmental conditions and hemodynamic responses (Table 1).
Table 1. Temperatures, Administered Fluid, Hemodynamic Responses, and Environmental Conditions 
Image not available
Table 1. Temperatures, Administered Fluid, Hemodynamic Responses, and Environmental Conditions 
×
The shivering threshold was reduced [nearly =] 0.4 [degree sign] Celsius by epidural anesthesia, from 36.7 +/- 0.6 to 36.3 +/- 0.5 [degree sign] Celsius (P < 0.05). The linear relationship between oxygen consumption and core temperature during shivering in individual volunteers was good. Correlation coefficients (r2) averaged 0.83 +/- 0.14 on the control days and 0.82 +/- 0.17 on the epidural days. Systemic gain of shivering, as determined by oxygen consumption, was reduced 63% from -581 +/- 186 to -215 +/- 154 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot][degree sign] Celsius sup -1 (P < 0.01;Figure 1).
Figure 1. Circles identify individual shivering gains without (control) and with epidural anesthesia. Squares show the mean values (+/- SD). The gain of shivering was reduced by 63% during epidural anesthesia from -581 +/- 186 to -215 +/- 154 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot][degree sign] Celsius sup -1 (P < 0.01).
Figure 1. Circles identify individual shivering gains without (control) and with epidural anesthesia. Squares show the mean values (+/- SD). The gain of shivering was reduced by 63% during epidural anesthesia from -581 +/- 186 to -215 +/- 154 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot][degree sign] Celsius sup -1 (P < 0.01).
Figure 1. Circles identify individual shivering gains without (control) and with epidural anesthesia. Squares show the mean values (+/- SD). The gain of shivering was reduced by 63% during epidural anesthesia from -581 +/- 186 to -215 +/- 154 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot][degree sign] Celsius sup -1 (P < 0.01).
×
Individual correlation coefficients between electromyographic intensity and core temperature in the upper and lower body averaged 0.75 +/- 0.22 and 0.72 +/- 0.28 on the control day and 0.83 +/- 0.09 and 0.35 +/- 0.28 on the epidural day. Lower-body gain was reduced from -0.73 +/- 0.85 to -0.04 +/- 0.06 units/[degree sign] Celsius during epidural anesthesia due to paralysis of the lower body (P < 0.01). However, there was no compensatory increase in upper-body gain during epidural anesthesia:-1.3 +/- 1.1 for control versus -2 +/- 2.1 for epidural (Figure 2). Maximum shivering intensity during epidural anesthesia, as determined by systemic oxygen consumption, decreased 32% from 607 +/- 82 to 412 +/- 50 ml/min (P < 0.05;Table 2).
Figure 2. Circles identify the gain of shivering, as determined by electromyography, of the upper body (pectoralis, trapezius) and lower body (rectus abdominis, quadriceps femoris) without (control) and with epidural anesthesia. Squares show the mean values (+/- SD). Lower-body gain was reduced from -0.73 +/- 0.85 to -0.04 +/- 0.06 intensity units/[degree sign] Celsius during epidural anesthesia because of the paralysis of the lower body (P < 0.01). However, there was no compensatory increase in upper-body gain during epidural anesthesia.
Figure 2. Circles identify the gain of shivering, as determined by electromyography, of the upper body (pectoralis, trapezius) and lower body (rectus abdominis, quadriceps femoris) without (control) and with epidural anesthesia. Squares show the mean values (+/- SD). Lower-body gain was reduced from -0.73 +/- 0.85 to -0.04 +/- 0.06 intensity units/[degree sign] Celsius during epidural anesthesia because of the paralysis of the lower body (P < 0.01). However, there was no compensatory increase in upper-body gain during epidural anesthesia.
Figure 2. Circles identify the gain of shivering, as determined by electromyography, of the upper body (pectoralis, trapezius) and lower body (rectus abdominis, quadriceps femoris) without (control) and with epidural anesthesia. Squares show the mean values (+/- SD). Lower-body gain was reduced from -0.73 +/- 0.85 to -0.04 +/- 0.06 intensity units/[degree sign] Celsius during epidural anesthesia because of the paralysis of the lower body (P < 0.01). However, there was no compensatory increase in upper-body gain during epidural anesthesia.
×
Table 2. Shivering Threshold, Gains, and Maximum Intensity 
Image not available
Table 2. Shivering Threshold, Gains, and Maximum Intensity 
×
Systemic gain in the entire study population, as determined by oxygen consumption, was reduced from -412 to -112 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot][degree sign] Celsius sup -1 (Figure 3). Gain, as determined by electromyography, was similar in the upper body with (-109 units/[degree sign] Celsius and without (-151 units/[degree sign] Celsius) epidural anesthesia. In contrast, epidural anesthesia markedly reduced gain from -70 units/[degree sign] Celsius to 4.5 units/[degree sign] Celsius (Figure 4).
Figure 3. Systemic oxygen consumption without (circles) and with (squares) epidural anesthesia. The horizontal standard deviation bars indicate variability in the thresholds (*) among the volunteers; although errors bars are shown only once in each series, the same temperature variability applies to each data point. The slopes of the oxygen consumption versus core temperature relations (solid lines) were determined using linear regression. These slopes defined the gain of shivering with and without epidural anesthesia. Gain was reduced 3.7 times, from -412 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot][degree sign] Celsius sup -1 (r2= 0.99) to -112 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot][degree sign] Celsius sup -1 (r2= 0.96). These gains are lower, and the ratio of the gains are higher, than those shown in Figure 1. This is entirely an artifact of averaging oxygen consumption among the volunteers before computing the regression, and it illustrates the importance of calculating the gain for each volunteer. Data are presented as mean +/- SD.
Figure 3. Systemic oxygen consumption without (circles) and with (squares) epidural anesthesia. The horizontal standard deviation bars indicate variability in the thresholds (*) among the volunteers; although errors bars are shown only once in each series, the same temperature variability applies to each data point. The slopes of the oxygen consumption versus core temperature relations (solid lines) were determined using linear regression. These slopes defined the gain of shivering with and without epidural anesthesia. Gain was reduced 3.7 times, from -412 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot][degree sign] Celsius sup -1 (r2= 0.99) to -112 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot][degree sign] Celsius sup -1 (r2= 0.96). These gains are lower, and the ratio of the gains are higher, than those shown in Figure 1. This is entirely an artifact of averaging oxygen consumption among the volunteers before computing the regression, and it illustrates the importance of calculating the gain for each volunteer. Data are presented as mean +/- SD.
Figure 3. Systemic oxygen consumption without (circles) and with (squares) epidural anesthesia. The horizontal standard deviation bars indicate variability in the thresholds (*) among the volunteers; although errors bars are shown only once in each series, the same temperature variability applies to each data point. The slopes of the oxygen consumption versus core temperature relations (solid lines) were determined using linear regression. These slopes defined the gain of shivering with and without epidural anesthesia. Gain was reduced 3.7 times, from -412 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot][degree sign] Celsius sup -1 (r2= 0.99) to -112 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot][degree sign] Celsius sup -1 (r2= 0.96). These gains are lower, and the ratio of the gains are higher, than those shown in Figure 1. This is entirely an artifact of averaging oxygen consumption among the volunteers before computing the regression, and it illustrates the importance of calculating the gain for each volunteer. Data are presented as mean +/- SD.
×
Figure 4. Root-mean-square electromyographic intensity from the upper and lower body without (circles) and with (squares) epidural anesthesia. The horizontal standard deviation bars indicate variability in the thresholds (*) among the volunteers; although error bars are shown only once, the same temperature variability applies to each data point in each series. The slopes of the electromyographic intensity versus core temperature relations (solid lines) were determined using linear regression. These slopes defined the gain of shivering with and without epidural anesthesia. Gain was similar in the upper body with (-109 units/[degree sign] Celsius, r2= 0.97) and without (-151 units/[degree sign] Celsius r2= 0.85) epidural anesthesia, for a ratio of 1.4. In contrast, epidural anesthesia markedly reduced gain in the lower body from -70 units/[degree sign] Celsius (r2= 0.99) to 4.5 units/[degree sign] Celsius (r2= 0.21). These gains are lower, and the ratio of the gains higher, than those shown in Figure 2. This is entirely an artifact of averaging oxygen consumption among the volunteers before computing the regression, and it illustrates the importance of calculating the gains for each volunteer. Data are presented as percentage changes from the shivering threshold, with error bars indicating SD.
Figure 4. Root-mean-square electromyographic intensity from the upper and lower body without (circles) and with (squares) epidural anesthesia. The horizontal standard deviation bars indicate variability in the thresholds (*) among the volunteers; although error bars are shown only once, the same temperature variability applies to each data point in each series. The slopes of the electromyographic intensity versus core temperature relations (solid lines) were determined using linear regression. These slopes defined the gain of shivering with and without epidural anesthesia. Gain was similar in the upper body with (-109 units/[degree sign] Celsius, r2= 0.97) and without (-151 units/[degree sign] Celsius r2= 0.85) epidural anesthesia, for a ratio of 1.4. In contrast, epidural anesthesia markedly reduced gain in the lower body from -70 units/[degree sign] Celsius (r2= 0.99) to 4.5 units/[degree sign] Celsius (r2= 0.21). These gains are lower, and the ratio of the gains higher, than those shown in Figure 2. This is entirely an artifact of averaging oxygen consumption among the volunteers before computing the regression, and it illustrates the importance of calculating the gains for each volunteer. Data are presented as percentage changes from the shivering threshold, with error bars indicating SD.
Figure 4. Root-mean-square electromyographic intensity from the upper and lower body without (circles) and with (squares) epidural anesthesia. The horizontal standard deviation bars indicate variability in the thresholds (*) among the volunteers; although error bars are shown only once, the same temperature variability applies to each data point in each series. The slopes of the electromyographic intensity versus core temperature relations (solid lines) were determined using linear regression. These slopes defined the gain of shivering with and without epidural anesthesia. Gain was similar in the upper body with (-109 units/[degree sign] Celsius, r2= 0.97) and without (-151 units/[degree sign] Celsius r2= 0.85) epidural anesthesia, for a ratio of 1.4. In contrast, epidural anesthesia markedly reduced gain in the lower body from -70 units/[degree sign] Celsius (r2= 0.99) to 4.5 units/[degree sign] Celsius (r2= 0.21). These gains are lower, and the ratio of the gains higher, than those shown in Figure 2. This is entirely an artifact of averaging oxygen consumption among the volunteers before computing the regression, and it illustrates the importance of calculating the gains for each volunteer. Data are presented as percentage changes from the shivering threshold, with error bars indicating SD.
×
Discussion
Regional anesthesia significantly decreased the shivering threshold by [nearly =] 0.4 [degree sign] Celsius, which is similar to the [nearly =] 0.6 [degree sign] Celsius reduction reported previously. [2,3,16] Our data thus confirm that peripheral regional anesthesia produces a central inhibition of thermoregulatory control. This central inhibition is, of course, compounded by direct peripheral inhibition of neuronally mediated thermoregulatory defenses. [17,18] 
The simplest model of thermoregulatory control would be one in which tissue temperatures are the only inputs and responses are entirely controlled by these temperature signals. Although widely adapted, [6,7] this model is not the only one advocated. A competing hypothesis is that mammals also sense body heat and cutaneous flow of heat. [8,9] Similarly, the system might well include feedback control of metabolic rate, just as sweating can be inhibited by skin wetting. [19] These models differ in that the regulatory system might compensate for lower-body paralysis in the latter two cases but not if temperature was the only input.
Epidural anesthesia decreased the gain of shivering by two thirds (based on individual responses) and decreased maximum intensity by one third. The thermo-regulatory system thus could not compensate for lower-body paralysis. Both results suggest that the human thermoregulatory system fails to discern or compensate when one half of the body is paralyzed during epidural anesthesia. That is, the regulatory system responds as if lower body muscular activity was normal. Because the alternative hypothesis would require that the central regulatory system detect heat production, [8,9] our data are most consistent with a system in which the major input is tissue temperature.
The gain of shivering was reduced nearly twice as much when calculated based on the average oxygen consumption versus core temperature regression than when it was based on the average of individual regressions. This difference is entirely an artifact of averaging oxygen consumption among individuals before computing the regression and illustrates the importance of identifying individual responses. For this reason we present the individual responses as our primary analysis, although the group average is clearer when depicted graphically.
The maximum shivering intensity we observed was relatively low ([nearly =] 600 ml/min oxygen consumption) and was about one half that reported during ice-water immersion. [4] Several factors may contribute to this relatively low maximum intensity. (1) We studied women rather than the (mostly) men who have been evaluated in previous studies. Women, of course, are generally smaller than men and have less muscle mass. Therefore they develop lower absolute maximum rates of oxygen consumption. (2) The skin temperature of our volunteers was relatively high ([nearly =] 33 [degree sign] Celsius). It is likely that very low skin temperatures during immersion hypothermia augment shivering to an extent that cannot be achieved by core hypothermia alone. (3) The maximum intensity was determined by a blinded observer who looked for a plateau in oxygen consumption. However, we had to stop the studies relatively early to avoid giving excessive fluid. It thus remains possible that with additional cooling, oxygen consumption would have increased more. Our maximum intensity estimates are, therefore, somewhat less reliable than the gain measurements.
Hypothermia during regional anesthesia is common [20] and can be nearly as severe as that observed during general anesthesia. [21,22] As during general anesthesia, [23] hypothermia during regional anesthesia results initially from vasodilation-induced core-to-peripheral redistribution of body heat. [11] Redistribution is followed in both cases by a period when heat loss exceeds metabolic heat production. [24] The decrease in core temperature persists until sufficient hypothermia triggers effective defenses. This is usually arteriovenous shunt vasoconstriction during general anesthesia [25] but is primarily shivering during epidural or spinal anesthesia. [26] 
Activation of shivering during regional anesthesia requires that core temperature decreases to the new threshold (usually [nearly =] 0.6 [degree sign] Celsius) less than values without anesthesia. [2,3,16] This decrease alone, however, seems insufficient to explain the amount of hypothermia typically observed during regional anesthesia. [21,22] Our data provide an additional explanation: Both the gain and maximum intensity of shivering were reduced by regional anesthesia. Thus, even once shivering is initiated, its intensity increases only gradually with further hypothermia, and its maximum intensity is much reduced. Old age [27] and sedatives [28,29] may further impair shivering during regional anesthesia, which also contributes to core hypothermia.
Ambient and skin temperature, hemodynamic responses, and administered fluid volumes were similar on the control and epidural study days. These factors are thus unlikely to explain observed differences between the treatment days. We evaluated only a single epidural anesthetic, and only at one relatively low block level. Reduction in the shivering threshold during regional anesthesia is proportional to block level. [30] It is also likely that even greater reductions in the shivering gain and maximum intensity would be observed with higher block levels.
In conclusion, our results confirm that epidural anesthesia significantly reduces the shivering threshold. The gain of shivering was reduced by 63% during epidural anesthesia because upper-body muscles failed to compensate for lower-body paralysis; the maximum intensity was also reduced by one third. The thermoregulatory system thus fails to recognize that regional anesthesia prevents the increase in regional metabolic heat production, instead responding as if lower-body muscular activity remained intact. These data support a thermoregulatory model in which tissue temperatures are the dominant input. They also explain why shivering so often fails to prevent core hypothermia during regional anesthesia.
REFERENCES
Sessler DI: Perioperative hypothermia. N Engl J Med 1997; 336:1730-7.
Kurz A, Sessler DI, Schroeder M, Kurz M: Thermoregulatory response thresholds during spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1993; 77:721-6.
Emerick TH, Ozaki M, Sessler DI, Walters K, Schroeder M: Epidural anesthesia increases apparent leg temperature and decreases the shivering threshold. Anesthesiology 1994; 81:289-98.
Giesbrecht GG, Sessler DI, Mekjavic IB, Schroeder M, Bristow GW: Treatment of immersion hypothermia by direct body-to-body contact. J Appl Physiol 1994; 76:2373-9.
Guyton AC: Textbook of Medical Physiology. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1996, p 908.
Satinoff E: Neural organization and evolution of thermal regulation in mammals-Several hierarchically arranged integrating systems may have evolved to achieve precise thermoregulation. Science 1978; 201:16-22.
Mekjavic IB, Morrison JB: A model of shivering thermogenesis based on the neurophysiology of thermoreception. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1985; 32:407-17.
Webb P: Continuous measurement of heat loss and heat production and the hypothesis of heat regulation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1997; 813:12-20.
Heising M, Werner J: Influences of overall thermal balance on local inputs for drive of evaporation in men. J Appl Physiol 1987; 62:926-31.
Glosten B, Hynson J, Sessler DI, McGuire J: Preanesthetic skin-surface warming reduces redistribution hypothermia caused by epidural block. Anesth Analg 1993; 77:488-93.
Matsukawa T, Sessler DI, Christensen R, Ozaki M, Schroeder M: Heat flow and distribution during epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1995; 83:961-7.
Lopez M, Sessler DI, Walter K, Emerick T, Ozaki M: Rate and gender dependence of the sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering thresholds in humans. Anesthesiology 1994; 80:780-8.
Sessler DI, McGuire J, Moayeri A, Hynson J: Isoflurane-induced vasodilation minimally increases cutaneous heat loss. Anesthesiology 1991; 74:226-32.
Sessler DI, Rubinstein EH, Moayeri A: Physiological responses to mild perianesthetic hypothermia in humans. Anesthesiology 1991; 75:594-610.
Kurz A, Xiong J, Sessler DI, Dechert M, Noyes K, Belani K: Desflurane reduces the gain of thermoregulatory arterio-venous shunt vasoconstriction in humans. Anesthesiology 1995; 83:1212-9.
Ozaki M, Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R, Schroeder M, Moayeri A, Noyes KM, Rotheneder E: Thermoregulatory thresholds during spinal and epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1994; 81:282-8.
Hales JRS: Skin arteriovenous anastomoses, their control and role in thermoregulation, Cardiovascular Shunts: Phylogenetic, Ontogenetic and Clinical Aspects. Edited by K Johansen, W Burggren. Copenhagen, Munksgaard, 1985, pp 433-51.
Rowell LB: Active neurogenic vasodilation in man, Vasodilatation. Edited by P Vanhoutte, I Leusen. New York, Raven Press, 1981, pp 1-17.
Adams WC, Mack GW, Langhans GW, Nadel ER: Effects of varied air velocity on sweating and evaporative rates during exercise. J Appl Physiol 1992; 73:2668-74.
Hendolin H, Lansimies E: Skin and central temperatures during continuous epidural analgesia and general anaesthesia in patients subjected to open prostatectomy. Ann Clin Res 1982; 14:181-6.
Frank SM, Beattie C, Christopherson R, Norris EJ, Rock P, Parker S, Kimball AW: Epidural versus general anesthesia, ambient operating room temperature, and patient age as predictors of inadvertent hypothermia. Anesthesiology 1992; 77:252-7.
Bredahl C, Hindsholm KB, Frandsen PC: Changes in body heat during hip fracture surgery: A comparison of spinal analgesia and general anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1991; 35:548-52.
Matsukawa T, Sessler DI, Sessler AM, Schroeder M, Ozaki M, Kurz A, Cheng C: Heat flow and distribution during induction of general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1995; 82:662-73.
Hynson J, Sessler DI: Intraoperative warming therapies: A comparison of three devices. J Clin Anesth 1992; 4:194-9.
Kurz A, Sessler DI, Christensen R, Dechert M: Heat balance and distribution during the core-temperature plateau in anesthetized humans. Anesthesiology 1995; 83:491-9.
Hynson J, Sessler DI, Glosten B, McGuire J: Thermal balance and tremor patterns during epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1991; 74:680-90.
Vassilieff N, Rosencher N, Sessler DI, Conseiller C: The shivering threshold during spinal anesthesia is reduced in the elderly. Anesthesiology 1995; 83:1162-6.
Matsukawa T, Kurz A, Sessler DI, Bjorksten AR, Merrifield B, Cheng C: Propofol linearity reduces the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds. Anesthesiology 1995; 82:1169-80.
Kurz A, Go JC, Sessler DI, Kaer K, Larson M, Bjorksten AR: Alfentanil slightly increases the sweating threshold and markedly reduces the vasoconstriction and shivering thresholds. Anesthesiology 1995; 83:293-9.
Leslie K, Sessler DI: Reduction in the shivering threshold is proportional to spinal block height. Anesthesiology 1996; 84:1327-31.
Figure 1. Circles identify individual shivering gains without (control) and with epidural anesthesia. Squares show the mean values (+/- SD). The gain of shivering was reduced by 63% during epidural anesthesia from -581 +/- 186 to -215 +/- 154 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot][degree sign] Celsius sup -1 (P < 0.01).
Figure 1. Circles identify individual shivering gains without (control) and with epidural anesthesia. Squares show the mean values (+/- SD). The gain of shivering was reduced by 63% during epidural anesthesia from -581 +/- 186 to -215 +/- 154 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot][degree sign] Celsius sup -1 (P < 0.01).
Figure 1. Circles identify individual shivering gains without (control) and with epidural anesthesia. Squares show the mean values (+/- SD). The gain of shivering was reduced by 63% during epidural anesthesia from -581 +/- 186 to -215 +/- 154 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot][degree sign] Celsius sup -1 (P < 0.01).
×
Figure 2. Circles identify the gain of shivering, as determined by electromyography, of the upper body (pectoralis, trapezius) and lower body (rectus abdominis, quadriceps femoris) without (control) and with epidural anesthesia. Squares show the mean values (+/- SD). Lower-body gain was reduced from -0.73 +/- 0.85 to -0.04 +/- 0.06 intensity units/[degree sign] Celsius during epidural anesthesia because of the paralysis of the lower body (P < 0.01). However, there was no compensatory increase in upper-body gain during epidural anesthesia.
Figure 2. Circles identify the gain of shivering, as determined by electromyography, of the upper body (pectoralis, trapezius) and lower body (rectus abdominis, quadriceps femoris) without (control) and with epidural anesthesia. Squares show the mean values (+/- SD). Lower-body gain was reduced from -0.73 +/- 0.85 to -0.04 +/- 0.06 intensity units/[degree sign] Celsius during epidural anesthesia because of the paralysis of the lower body (P < 0.01). However, there was no compensatory increase in upper-body gain during epidural anesthesia.
Figure 2. Circles identify the gain of shivering, as determined by electromyography, of the upper body (pectoralis, trapezius) and lower body (rectus abdominis, quadriceps femoris) without (control) and with epidural anesthesia. Squares show the mean values (+/- SD). Lower-body gain was reduced from -0.73 +/- 0.85 to -0.04 +/- 0.06 intensity units/[degree sign] Celsius during epidural anesthesia because of the paralysis of the lower body (P < 0.01). However, there was no compensatory increase in upper-body gain during epidural anesthesia.
×
Figure 3. Systemic oxygen consumption without (circles) and with (squares) epidural anesthesia. The horizontal standard deviation bars indicate variability in the thresholds (*) among the volunteers; although errors bars are shown only once in each series, the same temperature variability applies to each data point. The slopes of the oxygen consumption versus core temperature relations (solid lines) were determined using linear regression. These slopes defined the gain of shivering with and without epidural anesthesia. Gain was reduced 3.7 times, from -412 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot][degree sign] Celsius sup -1 (r2= 0.99) to -112 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot][degree sign] Celsius sup -1 (r2= 0.96). These gains are lower, and the ratio of the gains are higher, than those shown in Figure 1. This is entirely an artifact of averaging oxygen consumption among the volunteers before computing the regression, and it illustrates the importance of calculating the gain for each volunteer. Data are presented as mean +/- SD.
Figure 3. Systemic oxygen consumption without (circles) and with (squares) epidural anesthesia. The horizontal standard deviation bars indicate variability in the thresholds (*) among the volunteers; although errors bars are shown only once in each series, the same temperature variability applies to each data point. The slopes of the oxygen consumption versus core temperature relations (solid lines) were determined using linear regression. These slopes defined the gain of shivering with and without epidural anesthesia. Gain was reduced 3.7 times, from -412 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot][degree sign] Celsius sup -1 (r2= 0.99) to -112 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot][degree sign] Celsius sup -1 (r2= 0.96). These gains are lower, and the ratio of the gains are higher, than those shown in Figure 1. This is entirely an artifact of averaging oxygen consumption among the volunteers before computing the regression, and it illustrates the importance of calculating the gain for each volunteer. Data are presented as mean +/- SD.
Figure 3. Systemic oxygen consumption without (circles) and with (squares) epidural anesthesia. The horizontal standard deviation bars indicate variability in the thresholds (*) among the volunteers; although errors bars are shown only once in each series, the same temperature variability applies to each data point. The slopes of the oxygen consumption versus core temperature relations (solid lines) were determined using linear regression. These slopes defined the gain of shivering with and without epidural anesthesia. Gain was reduced 3.7 times, from -412 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot][degree sign] Celsius sup -1 (r2= 0.99) to -112 ml [center dot] min sup -1 [center dot][degree sign] Celsius sup -1 (r2= 0.96). These gains are lower, and the ratio of the gains are higher, than those shown in Figure 1. This is entirely an artifact of averaging oxygen consumption among the volunteers before computing the regression, and it illustrates the importance of calculating the gain for each volunteer. Data are presented as mean +/- SD.
×
Figure 4. Root-mean-square electromyographic intensity from the upper and lower body without (circles) and with (squares) epidural anesthesia. The horizontal standard deviation bars indicate variability in the thresholds (*) among the volunteers; although error bars are shown only once, the same temperature variability applies to each data point in each series. The slopes of the electromyographic intensity versus core temperature relations (solid lines) were determined using linear regression. These slopes defined the gain of shivering with and without epidural anesthesia. Gain was similar in the upper body with (-109 units/[degree sign] Celsius, r2= 0.97) and without (-151 units/[degree sign] Celsius r2= 0.85) epidural anesthesia, for a ratio of 1.4. In contrast, epidural anesthesia markedly reduced gain in the lower body from -70 units/[degree sign] Celsius (r2= 0.99) to 4.5 units/[degree sign] Celsius (r2= 0.21). These gains are lower, and the ratio of the gains higher, than those shown in Figure 2. This is entirely an artifact of averaging oxygen consumption among the volunteers before computing the regression, and it illustrates the importance of calculating the gains for each volunteer. Data are presented as percentage changes from the shivering threshold, with error bars indicating SD.
Figure 4. Root-mean-square electromyographic intensity from the upper and lower body without (circles) and with (squares) epidural anesthesia. The horizontal standard deviation bars indicate variability in the thresholds (*) among the volunteers; although error bars are shown only once, the same temperature variability applies to each data point in each series. The slopes of the electromyographic intensity versus core temperature relations (solid lines) were determined using linear regression. These slopes defined the gain of shivering with and without epidural anesthesia. Gain was similar in the upper body with (-109 units/[degree sign] Celsius, r2= 0.97) and without (-151 units/[degree sign] Celsius r2= 0.85) epidural anesthesia, for a ratio of 1.4. In contrast, epidural anesthesia markedly reduced gain in the lower body from -70 units/[degree sign] Celsius (r2= 0.99) to 4.5 units/[degree sign] Celsius (r2= 0.21). These gains are lower, and the ratio of the gains higher, than those shown in Figure 2. This is entirely an artifact of averaging oxygen consumption among the volunteers before computing the regression, and it illustrates the importance of calculating the gains for each volunteer. Data are presented as percentage changes from the shivering threshold, with error bars indicating SD.
Figure 4. Root-mean-square electromyographic intensity from the upper and lower body without (circles) and with (squares) epidural anesthesia. The horizontal standard deviation bars indicate variability in the thresholds (*) among the volunteers; although error bars are shown only once, the same temperature variability applies to each data point in each series. The slopes of the electromyographic intensity versus core temperature relations (solid lines) were determined using linear regression. These slopes defined the gain of shivering with and without epidural anesthesia. Gain was similar in the upper body with (-109 units/[degree sign] Celsius, r2= 0.97) and without (-151 units/[degree sign] Celsius r2= 0.85) epidural anesthesia, for a ratio of 1.4. In contrast, epidural anesthesia markedly reduced gain in the lower body from -70 units/[degree sign] Celsius (r2= 0.99) to 4.5 units/[degree sign] Celsius (r2= 0.21). These gains are lower, and the ratio of the gains higher, than those shown in Figure 2. This is entirely an artifact of averaging oxygen consumption among the volunteers before computing the regression, and it illustrates the importance of calculating the gains for each volunteer. Data are presented as percentage changes from the shivering threshold, with error bars indicating SD.
×
Table 1. Temperatures, Administered Fluid, Hemodynamic Responses, and Environmental Conditions 
Image not available
Table 1. Temperatures, Administered Fluid, Hemodynamic Responses, and Environmental Conditions 
×
Table 2. Shivering Threshold, Gains, and Maximum Intensity 
Image not available
Table 2. Shivering Threshold, Gains, and Maximum Intensity 
×