Free
Erratum  |   February 1999
ERRATUM 
Author Notes
  • Associate Professor;(Badner)
  • Professor and Chair; Department of Anaesthesia; Faculty of Medicine; University of Western Ontario; London, Ontario, Canada;(Gelb)
Article Information
Erratum
Erratum   |   February 1999
ERRATUM 
Anesthesiology 2 1999, Vol.90, 644. doi:
Anesthesiology 2 1999, Vol.90, 644. doi:
A correspondence reply by Badner and Gelb published in the November 1998 issue of Anesthesiology (1998; 89:1287-8) was printed without the accompanying Table 1. The corrected text and accompanying Table 1appear below.
Table 1. Results of Step-wise Logistic Regression, Including the Significant Variables and Some of the Nonsignificant Ones
Image not available
Table 1. Results of Step-wise Logistic Regression, Including the Significant Variables and Some of the Nonsignificant Ones
×
In Reply:-We thank Drs. Litwack and De Grutolla for their interest in our manuscript investigating postoperative myocardial infarction (PMI) after noncardiac surgery. As indicated, they would have preferred the use of multivariable statistical models in our data analysis. To answer their questions regarding change in heart rate and opioid use and the relative contributions of demographics, we performed a step-wise logistic regression using the variables listed in Table 2and Table 3of our original manuscript and postoperative change in heart rate. The main results are shown in Table 1. One can see that age and nitrate usage again were significantly linked with PMI. Change in heart rate on postoperative day 4 was determined to be a risk factor for PMI. Interestingly, hypotension in the postanesthetic care unit was the most significant risk factor for PMI. The decreased narcotic requirements in PMI patients again were not a significant risk factor. As indicated in our manuscript, we cannot determine whether the heart rate changes were the cause or the result of the PMI because of our lack of continuous heart rate recording. Similarly, postanesthetic care unit hypotension may have been an early clinical sign of the developing PMI and not a causative event because our enzyme assays were not performed before postanesthetic care unit arrival.
We cannot answer their question regarding the definition of MI and subsequent events because we did not, nor do we, have the ability to determine the occurrence of all non-MI deaths that occurred. Lastly, we would be happy to share our databse, as suggested, to enable the development and validation of risk profiles for MI and other surgical outcomes with appropriate investigations.
Neal H. Badner, M.D., F.R.C.P.C.
Associate Professor;
Adrian W. Gelb
Professor and Chair; Department of Anaesthesia; Faculty of Medicine; University of Western Ontario; London, Ontario, Canada;
(Accepted for publication July 7, 1998.)
REFERENCES
Badner NH, Knill RL, Brown JE, Novick TV, Gelb AW: Myocardial infarction after noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 1998; 88:572-8
Table 1. Results of Step-wise Logistic Regression, Including the Significant Variables and Some of the Nonsignificant Ones
Image not available
Table 1. Results of Step-wise Logistic Regression, Including the Significant Variables and Some of the Nonsignificant Ones
×