Free
Meeting Abstracts  |   September 1998
Cerebellar Nitric Oxide Is Increased during Isoflurane Anesthesia Compared to Halothane Anesthesia: A Microdialysis Study in Rats
Author Notes
  • (Loeb, Raj, Longnecker) Assistant Professor, Departments of Anesthesia and Pharmacology.
  • (Loeb) Research Specialist, Department of Anesthesia; Current address: Cytometrics, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • [Dagger] R. D. Dripps Professor and Chair.
  • Received from the Departments of Anesthesia and Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Submitted for publication December 29, 1997. Accepted for publication May 21, 1998. Supported in part by NIH R01 GM 34969 and a grant-in-aid from the Southeastern Pennsylvania Affiliate of the American Heart Association.
  • Address reprint requests to Dr. Loeb: Cytometrics, Inc., 615 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106. Address electronic mail to: loeb@cytometrics.com
Article Information
Meeting Abstracts   |   September 1998
Cerebellar Nitric Oxide Is Increased during Isoflurane Anesthesia Compared to Halothane Anesthesia: A Microdialysis Study in Rats
Anesthesiology 9 1998, Vol.89, 723-730.. doi:
Anesthesiology 9 1998, Vol.89, 723-730.. doi:
Key words: Cerebellum; halothane; isoflurane; kainic acid; microdialysis; nitric oxide; rat.
NITRIC OXIDE (NO) has important functions in many physiologic systems, including the brain [1] and cardiovascular system. [2] In neurons, NO synthesis can be stimulated by several compounds, including the excitatory amino acid glutamate. [3-5] In the brain, NO has been shown to influence the release of neurotransmitters, neuronal function and plasticity, neurotoxicity, and cerebral blood flow, [1,6] primarily through the stimulation of cyclic GMP production in target cells. [1-5,7] 
Several studies indicate that anesthesia interferes with NO/cyclic GMP system in the brain. Nitric oxide synthesis inhibition has been reported by some, [8,9] but not others, [10] to increase volatile anesthetic potency in rats and to prevent glutamatergic agonist-stimulated cyclic GMP accumulation in cerebellar slices. [11] Antagonists of the glutamatergic receptor, such as ketamine and MK-801, prevented glutamate-stimulated NO production in cultured neurons [5] and also increased the potency of general anesthetics. [12] Using primary cultures of rat cortical neurons, we [13] have shown that exposure to low, clinically relevant concentrations of isoflurane potentiated NO production in response to glutamatergic agonists; however, halothane and enflurane did not. Rengasamy et al. [14] recently reported that NO production was enhanced by isoflurane, but not halothane, in rat cerebellar slices.
Although the role of NO in anesthesia or consciousness is controversial, centrally released NO might influence at least some forms of neuronal transmission as well as local brain blood flow and vascular resistance. Our previous data [13] demonstrating an enhanced response to glutamatergic agonists during exposure to isoflurane in vitro were consistent with observations that NO-dependent circulatory control was enhanced during isoflurane compared with halothane [15,16] or pentobarbital [17] anesthesia. The goal in the present studies was to use a microdialysis technique to determine whether the anesthetics halothane or isoflurane altered NO concentrations in the cerebella of anesthetized rats, a location where NOS is highly expressed. [3,18] 
Materials and Methods
The chemicals used in the present study were obtained from the following sources: kainic acid, bovine hemoglobin, NG-nitroL-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), and all buffer constituents from Sigma (St. Louis, MO); halothane from Halocarbon Laboratories (Hackensack, NJ); isoflurane from Ohmeda (Liberty Corner, NJ); pancuronium bromide from Elkins-Sinn (Cherry Hill, NJ).
Male Wistar rats (250 - 400 g) were anesthetized with either halothane or isoflurane. A tracheostomy was performed, and anesthesia was maintained with halothane (1.2%) or isoflurane (1.4%) (concentrations corresponding to 1 MAC for each in rats [19,20]). Rats were mechanically ventilated (FiO2= 0.3) and then paralyzed with intravenous pancuronium bromide (1 mg/kg) to facilitate ventilation. [15] Catheters were placed in the aortic arch via the right carotid artery, the femoral artery, and the femoral vein for direct blood pressure monitoring and drug administration. All rats received a saline infusion of 1 ml/h. Body temperature was maintained at 37 [degree sign]C to 38 [degree sign]C with a heating pad. Arterial blood (200 [micro sign]l) was sampled periodically throughout the experiments and analyzed immediately for pH, PaO2, and PaCO2using a Corning 168 blood gas analyzer. PaCO2was maintained at normal values (approximately 35 - 40 mmHg) by ventilation rate.
Cranial Surgery
Rats were placed into a stereotaxic device (David Kopf Instr.). The skull was exposed by making a cranial incision running approximately 2 cm sagittally. The skin was retracted, and the remaining tissue carefully scraped from the skull until the coronal and sagittal sutures were evident. The bregma was used as a zero reference (horizontal) for positioning the microdialysis probe and for locating the underlying brain structures, using stereotaxic coordinates. [21] A small hole was made in the skull using a hand-held drill, and the underlying meninges was incised using a 27-gauge needle. The probe, attached to a micromanipulator on the stereotaxic device, was then lowered through the hole to a position just above the brain surface. Using this position as a zero reference (vertical), the microdialysis probe was lowered into the left cerebellum using the micromanipulator (1 mm lateral, -12.3 mm posterior, -6.5 mm ventral from bregma). The location of the probe was subsequently verified by histology.
Microdialysis techniques can be used to measure local production and release of certain compounds in discrete brain regions in vivo. [22] Using a hemoglobin trapping method, [23,24] microdialysis can be used to monitor brain NO concentrations. This relatively new technique takes advantage of the stoichiometric and irreversible binding of NO to hemoglobin and avoids the use of a bioassay for a second messenger, such as cyclic GMP, to monitor NO production. Binding of NO to oxyhemoglobin produces methemoglobin and nitrate. [25,26] The change in methemoglobin absorbance can then be correlated to a change in NO production.
Bovine hemoglobin was used to detect NO. Oxyhemoglobin (2 [micro sign]M, final concentration) was prepared as previously described [25] in artificial cerebral spinal fluid (ACSF, consisting of NaCl, 121 mM; KCl, 3.5 mM; NaHCO3, 25 mM; NaH2PO4, 1 mM; MgCl2, 1.2 mM; CaCl (2), 1 mM; pH, 7.35). Oxyhemoglobin, diluted in ACSF (ACSF-Hb), was prepared daily, filtered (0.2 [micro sign]m), and kept protected from light and on ice until use. Conversion of oxyhemoglobin to methemoglobin was quantitated by observing a difference in absorbance (401 - 411 nm) of the hemoglobin solution after exposure to NO donor compounds, exactly as described by Feelish and Noack. [27] 
Microdialysis Probe
Brain microdialysis probes (MD-2204, Bioanalytical Systems) with 320 [micro sign]m outer diameter, 4 mm membrane length, and low molecular weight cut off membrane (<5,000 d) were used. Probes were implanted in vivo, as described previously. In some cases, probes were placed in vitro as well, in a small foil-wrapped beaker containing ACSF (37 [degree sign]C). The in vitro probe served as a "blank" to control for absorbance not caused by NO. ACSF and ACSF-Hb were loaded into 1.25 ml gas tight syringes (Hamilton-Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) and pumped through the probe using a syringe pump (Harvard 22, Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA) at 2 [micro sign]l/min. ACSF-Hb syringes were wrapped with foil and cooled using refrigerant packs to limit autoxidation [24] and to prevent oxyhemoglobin degradation from the heat generated by the syringe pump. The connecting tubing from the syringe to the probe (approximately 27 cm with 3 - 4 [micro sign]l volume) was exposed to room temperature, allowing the hemoglobin solution to warm gradually before entering the probe. After probe implantation, ACSF alone was pumped through the probe for 60 min, before changing to an ACSF-Hb- containing syringe. ACSF-Hb was pumped through the probes for an additional 30 min before samples were collected for analysis. Preliminary data indicated that an additional 1.5 h were required before NO concentrations became stable. Others have shown a similar equilibration time was necessary for neurotransmitter levels to stabilize after probe implantation. [28,29] Outflow from the probe was collected into microcentrifuge tubes that were kept in a foil-wrapped container on ice. Thirty microliter samples were collected (over 15 min) in each tube. Tubes were kept on ice until analysis. Sample optical density at 401 and 411 nm was measured using a spectrophotometer (DU65, Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA) equipped with a 5-carat micro-cell.
Determination of Nitric Oxide Production
The hemoglobin-trapping technique is based on the stoicheometric reaction of NO with oxyhemoglobin to produce methemoglobin and nitrate. [25,26] The oxidation of oxyhemoglobin by NO to methemoglobin produces a characteristic increase in the hemoglobin absorbance spectrum at 401 nm with no change in the absorbance at the isosbestic point at 411 nm. [25-27] Thus the difference between the absorbance at 401 and 411 nm can be used to calculate the concentration of methemoglobin formed. To calculate the increase in methemoglobin, and therefore NO trapped within a dialysate sample, the difference in absorbance (e.g., 401-411) was divided by the molar extinction coefficient for the reaction (Delta [Greek small letter epsilon] (401-411) = 38 mM-1[middle dot] cm-1), exactly as described [25] using the formula: [NO] = OD401-411/(Delta [Greek small letter epsilon]401-411) [middle dot] (path length). The path length in our cuvette was 1 cm. The use of the isosbestic point measurement is necessary to correct for any slight changes in the concentration of hemoglobin that may occur in the system. [25,26] The theoretical limit of detection in our system was 26 nM.
To determine the change in absorbance caused by the production of NO in vivo, it was necessary to determine the hemoglobin autoxidation rate over the time course of the experiment (several hours) and to correct for the non-NO-related absorbance of the hemoglobin solution itself. For these experiments, the same hemoglobin solution was divided into two syringes and was pumped simultaneously through two microdialysis probes using the same syringe pump; one probe was placed in vivo and the other in vitro, as described previously. Because methemoglobin is produced spontaneously within oxygenated hemoglobin solutions, by reactions unrelated to the formation of NO, [26] it was necessary to know the rate of spontaneous oxidation of hemoglobin in parallel control solutions (the in vitro probe) to determine the portion of the change in the 401 - 411 value caused by NO. Subtracting the 401 - 411 value of the solution passing through the in vitro probe from 401 - 411 value of the solution passing through the rat brain effectively corrected for the changes resulting from autoxidation and was analogous to using an external reference. The autoxidation rate was found to be constant over the time course of a single experiment and did not vary from day to day (equivalent to 30 +/- 2 nM per 15-min period). In experiments where the change in NO production after drug administration was determined, autoxidation was estimated by subtracting a constant based on the predetermined autoxidation rate from the observed 401 - 411 value of obtain a corrected value. The corrected value was used to calculate NO production.
Protocols
Unstimulated Nitric Oxide Production. Nitric oxide concentrations were determined quantitatively using the two-microdialysis probe technique in control animals and in those pretreated with the NOS inhibitor NG-nitroL-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 40 mg/kg intravenously). L-NAME was dissolved in 0.5 ml saline and administered over 2.5 min at least 60 min before collection of baseline dialysate samples to obtain maximal inhibition of brain NO synthase. [30] After the equilibration period in either control or L-NAME-treated rats, dialysate samples were collected every 15 min. The average NO concentrations during the final 90 min of dialysis were used to determine the basal NO value (an equivalent time period was used for stimulated NO production experiments).
Stimulated Nitric Oxide Production. The glutamate receptor agonist kainic acid (KA, 5 mg/kg) was infused over 5 min into the aortic arch catheter to stimulate brain NO production. Administration of the drug by this route ensured that it would be delivered to the brain via the left carotid artery and circle of Willis as well as the vertebral arteries. The preferred method of drug delivery using microdialysis would have been directly through the probe. However, preliminary studies indicated that mixing KA with the oxyhemoglobin dialysate interfered with the spectrophotometric assay. In separate groups of rats, L-NAME (40 mg/kg, intravenous) was administered (as described previously) at least 60 min before administration of KA. A single microdialysis probe was used in these experiments. Samples were collected every 15 min over the same time period used for the unstimulated NO production experiments. The change in NO produced by KA was calculated by averaging the 401 - 411 value of the dialysates in the three samples preceding the infusion of KA to obtain an initial value at t = 0. The amount of NO produced after KA administration was calculated based on the change in 401 - 411 value from the initial value after correction for hemoglobin degradation.
Statistical Analysis. Data are presented as mean +/- SEM. The differences within and between multiple groups over time were determined using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures followed by Newman Keul's multiple comparisons test. Differences between independent groups were analyzed by one way ANOVA.
Results
Unstimulated Cerebellar Nitric Oxide Production
After the equilibration period in either control or L-NAME treated rats, dialysate samples were collected every 15 min for 90 min using the two microdialysis probe technique to calculate NO concentrations in rat cerebelum. Linear regression analysis indicated there was no significant trend of increase or decrease in NO concentration over this time period in any group and so the average NO concentration over the observation period was calculated for each group. NO concentrations were significantly greater during isoflurane (532 +/- 31 nM) than halothane (303 +/- 23 nM) anesthesia (n = 6 in each group). Pretreatment with L-NAME significantly reduced NO concentrations in rats anesthetized with isoflurane (365 +/- 65 n [n = 7]), but not halothane (281 +/- 61 nM [n = 10]) when compared to NO concentrations observed in the absence of the NOS inhibitor in each group.
Stimulated Nitric Oxide Production
In cultured rat cortical neurons, we demonstrated previously that NO production in response to glutamatergic agonists, including KA, was enhanced in the presence of isoflurane, but unaffected by halothane. [13] To determine whether the same phenomenon occurred in the cerebelum in vivo, KA was administered to rats during halothane or isoflurane anesthesia in the presence or absence of L-NAME. In these studies, NO production was determined using a single microdialysis probe. The change in NO concentration after KA was determined over the same time course described previously for determination of unstimulated NO concentrations. All data were analyzed together using two-way repeated measures ANOVA to compare responses in both anesthetic groups, but the response of each anesthetic group was graphed separately for improved clarity of display. KA significantly increased NO (two-way repeated measures ANOVA; F = 2.522; P = 0.004; Figure 1). NO increased more during isoflurane than during halothane anesthesia at t = 30 min (isoflurane 414 +/- 82 nM vs. halothane 183 +/- 65 nM) and t = 75 min (isoflurane 560 +/- 93 nM vs. halothane 196 +/- 69 nM). During isoflurane anesthesia, KA increased NO at all time points compared to t = 0, and L-NAME inhibited the effect of KA throughout the observation period. In contrast, during halothane anesthesia, KA-stimulated an increase in NO in control rats at t = 45 min only. L-NAME pretreatment prevented the effect of KA. There were no differences in NO between the two groups pretreated with L-NAME.
Figure 1. KA administration increased cerebellar NO during isofurane or halothane anesthesia. Pretreatment with L-NAME (40 mg/kg) inhibited KA-stimulated NO production (n = 5 in each group). *P < 0.05, KA versus KA + L-NAME.
Figure 1. KA administration increased cerebellar NO during isofurane or halothane anesthesia. Pretreatment with L-NAME (40 mg/kg) inhibited KA-stimulated NO production (n = 5 in each group). *P < 0.05, KA versus KA + L-NAME.
Figure 1. KA administration increased cerebellar NO during isofurane or halothane anesthesia. Pretreatment with L-NAME (40 mg/kg) inhibited KA-stimulated NO production (n = 5 in each group). *P < 0.05, KA versus KA + L-NAME.
×
Intra-arterial KA administration produced a triphasic effect on MAP in the rats (Figure 2): a transient increase in MAP lasting approximately 1 - 3 min, followed by a decrease in MAP, with the minimum MAP observed at approximately 15 min, and finally, an increase back to control or higher values. The only significant effect of KA on MAP was the transient decrease in MAP at t = 15 min in both groups that recovered to control values by t = 30 min. L-NAME significantly increased MAP in both groups as expected. After L-NAME treatment, KA administration did not significantly alter MAP during halothane or isoflurane anesthesia.
Figure 2. Effect of KA administration on mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) during anesthesia with isoflurane (top) or halothane (bottom) in the presence or absence of L-NAME (40 mg/kg, intravenous, 1-h pretreatment). Data are from the same rats as shown in Figure 1. There were five rats in each group. *P < 0.05 compared to t = 0. Time of KA administration is indicated by the box.
Figure 2. Effect of KA administration on mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) during anesthesia with isoflurane (top) or halothane (bottom) in the presence or absence of L-NAME (40 mg/kg, intravenous, 1-h pretreatment). Data are from the same rats as shown in Figure 1. There were five rats in each group. *P < 0.05 compared to t = 0. Time of KA administration is indicated by the box.
Figure 2. Effect of KA administration on mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) during anesthesia with isoflurane (top) or halothane (bottom) in the presence or absence of L-NAME (40 mg/kg, intravenous, 1-h pretreatment). Data are from the same rats as shown in Figure 1. There were five rats in each group. *P < 0.05 compared to t = 0. Time of KA administration is indicated by the box.
×
Discussion
The data presented here demonstrate that NO in the cerebella of intact rats can be measured by microdialysis and the hemoglobin-trapping method. NO concentrations were greater during isoflurane anesthesia than during halothane anesthesia. KA administration stimulated NO production in the presence of either anesthetic, with the increase greater during isoflurane anesthesia than halothane anesthesia. Increased NO during isoflurane would be expected to influence both central neuronal function and cerebral vasculature.
These findings support our previous reports indicating that the contribution of NO to cardiovascular control in vivo was greater during isoflurane anesthesia than halothane anesthesia, [15,16] and that isoflurane enhanced NO production in cultured neurons stimulated by KA. [13] Consistent with our observation that isoflurane anesthesia was associated with enhanced NO-dependent regional blood flow as compared with halothane anesthesia, [15] Lee et al. [31] found that isoflurane induced a larger increase in erythrocyte flow in the rat brain microcirculation than did halothane. In addition, Sturaitis et al. [17] reported that isoflurane-, but not pentobarbital-, anesthetized dogs responded to the cholinergic agonist oxotremorine with an increase in cerebral blood flow that was prevented by L-NAME in most brain regions. When superfused over a cranial window preparation in fentanyl/N2O anesthetized rats, 1% isoflurane produced approximately 17% dilation of pial arterioles, [32] whereas 1% halothane produced approximately 10% dilation, [33] both of which were inhibited by NOS inhibitors.
The effect of the volatile anesthetics on neuronal NO production is not well understood; however, an effect of anesthetics on neuronal NO production could alter cardiovascular responses as well as anesthetic state. We speculate that an increase in response to agonist stimulation could be responsible for enhanced global brain blood flow or increased flow to specific brain areas during isoflurane anesthesia. Isoflurane has been shown to improve brain function during conditions of altered oxygen delivery to tissue, such as systemic hemorrhage [34] or regional ischemia of the human [35] or animal [36] brain. The mechanism(s) by which isoflurane specifically produces these effects is not clear but may be due, at least in part, to enhanced NO concentrations. For example, increased brain NO (produced by L-arginine infusion) has been reported to promote NO-dependent vasodilation, to increase regional cerebral blood flow, and to reduce infarct volume after middle cerebral artery occlusion. [37] Conversely, blockade of NO production has been reported to alter anesthetic potency, [8,9] to increase the duration of bicuculline-induced seizures [38] and the severity of kainic acid-induced seizures [39] in rats, and to inhibit cortical spreading depression in rabbits [40] and cats. [41] These data suggest that NO may be a key compound that links changes in cerebral blood flow and metabolism, is an endogenous anticonvulsant, or a neuroprotectant during ischemia.
The present experiments did not allow us to determine the source of the NO that we measured; however, the most likely sources were from neurons or glia. [18,42,43] Faraci et al. [44] asked whether the cerebral hyperemia in response to KA stimulation in rabbits was a result of NO release from vascular as well as nonvascular tissue. They found that KA produced NO-mediated dilation of cerebral arterioles in vivo but did not alter diameters in isolated cerebral vessels. Their data indicated that KA did not directly stimulate NO-dependent vasodilation of cerebral blood vessels. However, their data did not exclude the possibility that KA receptor-containing neurons within a neuronal network could have stimulated the release of acetylcholine or another neurotransmitter from nearby neurons that in turn could stimulate the release of NO from cerebrovascular endothelial cells.
Pretreatment with L-NAME significantly reduced basal levels of NO in the cerebellum during anesthesia with isoflurane, but not halothane, even though L-NAME prevented agonist stimulated increases in NO during anesthesia with either drug. Although some investigators have reported NOS inhibitors to reduce basal NO production in brain, [45-48] others have not. [23,24,29] The reasons for these different findings are not readily apparent, but may be the result of the specific techniques, brain locations studied, or anesthetics used. However, in all the studies cited previously, pretreatment with a NOS inhibitor prevented agonist-stimulated increases in NO production. In studies of the effects of NOS inhibition on cerebral blood flow and NOS activity, Iadecola et al. [30] reported that systemic administration of maximally effective doses of NOS inhibitors induced rapid and sustained increases in MAP, but that maximal inhibition of brain NOS under these circumstances was approximately 50%. It may be that L-NAME did not completely block cerebellar NOS activity in our experiments.
Inhibition of NOS with L-NAME significantly increased MAP during isoflurane and halothane anesthesia, as we have shown previously using a different NOS inhibitor, NG-monomethylL-arginine (L-NMMA). [15,16] As shown (Figure 2) L-NAME pretreatment prevented the KA-induced decrease in MAP, strongly suggesting that the effects of KA on MAP were caused by activation of the NO system and that the dose of L-NAME we used blocked peripheral as well as brain NOS. In addition, the decrease in MAP induced by KA administration could not explain the effects of KA in the cerebellum because maximal effects of KA on brain NO occurred after MAP had returned to control values.
The biochemical mechanism for the increase in NO during isoflurane anesthesia also is not clear. Isoflurane or halothane have been reported to have no inhibitory influence on NOS enzyme activity. [49] However, in both cerebellar slices [14] and in cultured cortical neurons, [13] isoflurane, but not halothane, increased NO production. One possible explanation might be an alteration in cellular signaling. Isoflurane has been shown to increase [Ca2+]iin response to glutamatergic agonists in sub-populations of cultured hippocampal neurons from fetal rats. [50] In cultured endothelial cells, we have shown that halothane, but not isoflurane, can inhibit agonist stimulated calcium mobilization. [51] These data suggest that some anesthetics, but not others, may interfere with cellular signaling and that such changes might be responsible for the changes in NO production we observed.
In conclusion, NO production in the cerebellum, monitored by intracranial microdialysis, was greater during isoflurane than halothane anesthesia. The glutamatergic agonist KA stimulated NO production significantly in the presence of halothane or isoflurane, although the magnitude and time course of the response was different, depending on the anesthetic. Increased NO production during isoflurane anesthesia would be expected to impact neuronal function and cerebral blood flow.
The authors thank Keith Freeman, Ph.D., for his assistance in the preliminary stages of this project.
REFERENCES
Bredt DS, Snyder SH: Nitric oxide: A physiologic messenger molecule. Annu Rev Biochem 1994; 63:175-95
Moncada S, Higgs A: The L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway. N Engl J Med 1993; 329:2002-12
Bredt DS, Snyder SH: Nitric oxide mediates glutamate-linked enhancement of cGMP levels in the cerebellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989; 86:9030-3
Garthwaite J, Charles SL, Chess-Williams R: Endothelium-derived relaxing factor release on activation of NMDA receptors suggests role as intercellular messenger in the brain. Nature 1988; 336:385-8
Gonzales JM, Loeb AL, Reichard PS, Irvine S: Ketamine inhibits glutamate-, N-methyl-D-aspartate-, and quisqualate-stimulated cGMP production in cultured cerebral neurons. Anesthesiology 1995; 82:205-13
Dawson TM, Dawson VL, Snyder SH: A novel neuronal messenger molecule in brain: The free radical, nitric oxide. Ann Neurol 1992; 32:297-311
Southam E, Garthwaite J: The nitric oxide-cyclic GMP signalling pathway in rat brain. Neuropharmacology 1993; 32:1267-77
Pajewski TN, DiFazio CA, Moscicki JC, Johns RA: Nitric oxide synthase inhibitors, 7-nitro indazole and nitroG-L-arginine methyl ester, dose dependently reduce the threshold for isoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1996; 85:1111-9
Johns RA, Moscicki JC, DiFazio CA: Nitric oxide synthase inhibitor dose-dependently and reversibly reduces the threshold for halothane anesthesia. A role for nitric oxide in mediating consciousness? Anesthesiology 1992; 77:779-84
Adachi T, Kurata J, Nakao S, Murakawa M, Shichino T, Shirakami G, Shinomura T, Mori K: Nitric oxide synthase inhibitor does not reduce minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration of halothane in rats. Anesth Analg 1994; 78:1154-7
Terasako K, Nakamura K, Miyawaki I, Toda H, Kakuyama M, Mori K: Inhibitory effects of anesthetics on cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) accumulation in rat cerebellar slices. Anesth Analg 1994; 79:921-6
Daniell LC: The noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists, MK-801, phencyclidine and ketamine, increase the potency of general anesthetics. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1990; 36:111-5
Loeb AL, Gonzales JM, Reichard PS: Isoflurane enhances glutamatergic agonist-stimulated nitric oxide synthesis in cultured neurons. Brain Res 1996; 734:295-300
Rengasamy A, Pajewski TN, Johns RA: Inhalational anesthetic effects on rat cerebellar nitric oxide and cyclic guanosine monophosphate production. Anesthesiology 1997; 86:689-98
Greenblatt EP, Loeb AL, Longnecker DE: Endothelium-dependent circulatory control-A mechanism for the differing peripheral vascular effects of isoflurane versus halothane. Anesthesiology 1992; 77:1178-85
Loeb AL, Godeny I, Longnecker DE: Anesthetics alter the relative contributions of NO and EDHF in the rat cremaster muscle microcirculation. Am J Physiol 1997; 273:H618-27
Sturaitis MK, Moore LE, Kirsch JR, McPherson RW: A cholinergic agonist induces cerebral hyperemia in isoflurane-but not pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs. Anesth Analg 1994; 78:876-83
Southam E, Morris R, Garthwaite J: Sources and targets of nitric oxide in rat cerebellum. Neurosci Lett 1992; 137:241-4
White PF, Johnston RR, Eger EI, II. Determination of anesthetic requirement in rats. Anesthesiology 1974; 40:52-7
Eger EI, 2d., Johnson BH: Rates of awakening from anesthesia with I-653, halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane: A test of the effect of anesthetic concentration and duration in rats. Anesth Analg 1987; 66:977-82
Pellegrino LJ, Pellegrino AS, Cushman AJ: A Stereotaxic Atlas of the Rat Brain. New York, Plenum Press, 1979
Benveniste H, Huttemeier PC: Microdialysis: Theory and application. Prog Neurobiol 1990; 35:195-215
Balcioglu A, Maher TJ: Determination of kainic acid-induced release of nitric oxide using a novel hemoglobin trapping technique with microdialysis. J Neurochem 1993; 61:2311-3
Zhang YN, Samson FE, Nelson SR, Pazdernik TL: Nitric-oxide detection with intracerebral microdialysis: Important considerations in the application of the hemoglobin-trapping technique. J Neurosci Meth 1996; 68:165-73
Murphy ME, Noack E: Nitric oxide assay using hemoglobin method. Methods Enzymol 1994; 233:240-50
Feelisch M, Kubitzek D, Werringloer J: The oxyhemoglobin assay, Methods in Nitric Oxide Research. Edited by Feelisch M, Stamler JS. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, 1996, pp 455-78
Feelisch M, Noack EA: Correlation between nitric oxide formation during degradation of organic nitrates and activation of guanylate cyclase. Eur J Pharmacol 1987; 139:19-30
Freeman KA, Tallarida RJ: A quantitative study of dopamine control in the rat striatum. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1994; 268:629-38
Shintani F, Kanba S, Nakaki T, Sato K, Yagi G, Kato R, Asai M: Measurement by in vivo brain microdialysis of nitric oxide release in the rat cerebellum. J Psychiatry Neurosci 1994; 19:217-21
Iadecola C, Pelligrino DA, Moskowitz MA, Lassen NA: Nitric oxide synthase inhibition and cerebrovascular regulation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1994; 14:175-92
Lee JG, Hudetz AG, Smith JJ, Hillard CJ, Bosnjak ZJ, Kampine JP: The effects of halothane and isoflurane on cerebrocortical microcirculation and autoregulation as assessed by laser-doppler flowmetry. Anesth Analg 1994; 79:58-65
Koenig HM, Pelligrino DA, Wang Q, Albrecht RF: Role of nitric oxide and endothelium in rat pial vessel dilation response to isoflurane. Anesth Analg 1994; 79:886-91
Koenig HM, Pelligrino DA, Albrecht RF: Halothane vasodilation and nitric oxide in rat pial vessels. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 1993; 5:264-71
Newberg LA, Michenfelder JD: Cerebral protection by isoflurane during hypoxemia or ischemia. Anesthesiology 1983; 59:29-35
Michenfelder JD, Sundt TM, Fode N, Sharbrough FW: Isoflurane when compared to enflurane and halothane decreases the frequency of cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy. Anesthesiology 1987; 67:336-40
Newberg LA, Milde JH, Michenfelder JD: Systemic and cerebral effects of isoflurane-induced hypotension in dogs. Anesthesiology 1984; 60:541-6
Morikawa E, Moskowitz MA, Huang Z, Yoshida T, Irikura K, Dalkara T: L-arginine infusion promotes nitric oxide-dependent vasodilation, increases regional cerebral blood flow, and reduces infarction volume in the rat. Stroke 1994; 25:429-35
Theard MA, Baughman VL, Wang Q, Pelligrino DA, Albrecht RF: The role of nitric oxide in modulating brain activity and blood flow during seizure. Neuroreport 1995; 6:921-4
Penix LP, Davis W, Subramaniam S: Inhibition of NO synthase increases the severity of kainic acid-induced seizures in rodents. Epilepsy Res 1994; 18:177-84
Colonna DM, Meng W, Deal DD, Busija DW: Nitric oxide promotes arteriolar dilation during cortical spreading depression in rabbits. Stroke 1994; 25:2463-70
Goadsby PJ, Kaube H, Hoskin KL: Nitric oxide synthesis couples cerebral blood flow and metabolism. Brain Res 1992; 595:167-70
Faraci FM, Brian JE Jr: Nitric oxide and the cerebral circulation. Stroke 1994; 25:692-703
Murphy S, Simmons ML, Agullo L, Garcia A, Feinstein DL, Galea E, Reis DJ, Minc-Golomb D, Schwartz JP: Synthesis of nitric oxide in CNS glial cells. Trends Neurosci 1993; 16:323-8
Faraci FM, Breese KR, Heistad DD: Responses of cerebral arterioles to kainate. Stroke 1994; 25:2080-3
Luo D, Knezevich S, Vincent SR: N-methyl-D-aspartate-induced nitric oxide release: an in vivo microdialysis study. Neuroscience 1993; 57:897-900
Ohta K, Araki N, Shibata M, Hamada J, Komatsumoto S, Shimazu K, Fukuuchi Y: Correlation of in vivo nitric oxide and cGMP with glutamate/glutamine metabolism in the rat striatum. Neurosci Res 1996; 25:379-84
Williams JA, Vincent SR, Reiner PB: Nitric-oxide production in rat thalamus changes with behavioral state, local depolarization, and brain-stem stimulation. J Neurosci 1997; 17:420-7
Northington FJ, Tobin JR, Koehler RC, Traystman RJ: In vivo production of nitric oxide correlates with NMDA-induced cerebral hyperemia in newborn sheep. Am J Physiol 1995; 269:H215-21
Rengasamy A, Ravichandran LV, Reikersdorfer CG, Johns RA: Inhalational anesthetics do not alter nitric oxide synthase activity. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1995; 273:599-604
Puil E, El-Beheiry H, Baimbridge KG: Anesthetic effects on glutamate-stimulated increase in intraneuronal calcium. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1990; 255:955-61
Loeb AL, Longnecker DE, Williamson JR: Alteration of calcium mobilization in endothelial cells by volatile anesthetics. Biochem Pharmacol 1993; 45:1137-42
Figure 1. KA administration increased cerebellar NO during isofurane or halothane anesthesia. Pretreatment with L-NAME (40 mg/kg) inhibited KA-stimulated NO production (n = 5 in each group). *P < 0.05, KA versus KA + L-NAME.
Figure 1. KA administration increased cerebellar NO during isofurane or halothane anesthesia. Pretreatment with L-NAME (40 mg/kg) inhibited KA-stimulated NO production (n = 5 in each group). *P < 0.05, KA versus KA + L-NAME.
Figure 1. KA administration increased cerebellar NO during isofurane or halothane anesthesia. Pretreatment with L-NAME (40 mg/kg) inhibited KA-stimulated NO production (n = 5 in each group). *P < 0.05, KA versus KA + L-NAME.
×
Figure 2. Effect of KA administration on mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) during anesthesia with isoflurane (top) or halothane (bottom) in the presence or absence of L-NAME (40 mg/kg, intravenous, 1-h pretreatment). Data are from the same rats as shown in Figure 1. There were five rats in each group. *P < 0.05 compared to t = 0. Time of KA administration is indicated by the box.
Figure 2. Effect of KA administration on mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) during anesthesia with isoflurane (top) or halothane (bottom) in the presence or absence of L-NAME (40 mg/kg, intravenous, 1-h pretreatment). Data are from the same rats as shown in Figure 1. There were five rats in each group. *P < 0.05 compared to t = 0. Time of KA administration is indicated by the box.
Figure 2. Effect of KA administration on mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) during anesthesia with isoflurane (top) or halothane (bottom) in the presence or absence of L-NAME (40 mg/kg, intravenous, 1-h pretreatment). Data are from the same rats as shown in Figure 1. There were five rats in each group. *P < 0.05 compared to t = 0. Time of KA administration is indicated by the box.
×