Free
Clinical Science  |   May 1999
Rapid Saline Infusion Produces Hyperchloremic Acidosis in Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Surgery 
Author Notes
  • (Scheingraber, Rehm) Staff Anesthesiologist.
  • (Sehmisch) Research Fellow.
  • (Finsterer) Professor of Anesthesiology.
  • Received from the Clinic of Anesthesiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Klinikum Grosshadern, Munich, Germany. Submitted for publication April 3, 1998. Accepted for publication November 30, 1998. Supported by the research budget of Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
  • Address reprint requests to: Professor Dr. Finsterer: Clinic of Anesthesiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistr. 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany. Address electronic mail to:
Article Information
Clinical Science
Clinical Science   |   May 1999
Rapid Saline Infusion Produces Hyperchloremic Acidosis in Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Surgery 
Anesthesiology 5 1999, Vol.90, 1265-1270. doi:
Anesthesiology 5 1999, Vol.90, 1265-1270. doi:
This article is accompanied by an Editorial View. Please see Prough DS, Bidani A: Hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis is a predictable consequence of intraoperative infusion of 0.9% saline. Anesthesiology 1999; 90:1247–9.
DESPITE the common practice of crystalloid infusion during surgery, few data have been published that describe acid-base changes associated with infusion of 0.9% saline. The recognition that 0.9% saline contains chloride in a nonphysiologic concentration led to the introduction of lactated Ringer's solution. [1 ] Only a few experimental data [2–4 ] and some recent case reports [5–8 ] exist that support the occurrence of metabolic acidosis in the course of large 0.9% saline infusions. This acidosis is still called "dilutional acidosis." [9 ] All published studies are based on traditional knowledge of the acid-base balance. [10 ] By comparing two groups of patients who received 0.9% saline or lactated Ringer's solution, we assessed the influence of crystalloid infusion on acid-base changes. We planned to compare the changes in serum bicarbonate concentration (Bic), as calculated by the Henderson-Hasselbalch Equation withthose calculated using the Stewart equations. Fifteen years ago, Stewart developed a mathematically derived approach to acid-base chemistry. [11 ]
Materials and Methods 
We studied 24 women without apparent cardiac, pulmonary, or renal diseases (classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II) who were scheduled for elective lower abdominal gynecologic surgery. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient before surgery, and the protocol was approved by the ethics committee of our institution. During the study, no patient received colloids, plasma products, or blood transfusions. The patients were assigned randomly to receive either 0.9% saline (saline group, n = 12) or lactated Ringer's solution (Ringer's group, n = 12). The saline solution contained 154 mM sodium and 154 mM chloride; the lactated Ringer's solution contained 130 mM sodium, 5.4 mM potassium, 1.8 mM calcium, 112 mM chloride, and 27 mM lactate.
General anesthesia was induced with intravenous thiopental, sufentanil, and cisatracurium. After tracheal intubation, anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane, 0.4–1.5 vol% in an oxygen-nitrous oxide mixture of 1:1, and additional doses of sufentanil and cisatracurium as appropriate. Radial arterial and central venous catheters were inserted. Mechanical ventilation was performed to maintain the arterial oxygen tension (PaO(2)) at 250–300 mmHg and the arterial carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO(2)) as close as possible to 40 mmHg. Intraoperative monitoring included end-tidal PaCO(2), cardiac electric activity, central venous pressure, arterial blood pressure, pulse oximetry, and esophageal temperature. During the operative period, the patient's temperature was kept constant using fluid warmers and warming blankets.
During stable anesthetic conditions and at the time of surgical incision, the investigation was started and arterial blood was withdrawn to measure baseline values (time = 0 min). The samples were analyzed for PaO(2), pH, PaCO(2)(using standard electrodes), the concentrations of serum sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), chloride (Cl-)(using ion-selective electrodes), and serum lactate (Lac-)(using the enzymatic method, quantification of hydrogen peroxide) all integrated using a Radiometer analyzer (Radiometer ABL 620 GL; Radiometer Company, Copenhagen, Denmark). In addition, the serum total protein concentration was determined using the Biuret method. After the baseline blood samples were collected, the crystalloid infusion (0.9% saline vs. lactated Ringer's solution) was started. We planned an infusion rate of 30 ml [middle dot] kg-1[middle dot] h-1in both groups using a common infusion device. Every 30 min, new blood samples were taken, urine production and temperature were measured, and blood loss was estimated. When K+was less than 3.3 mM, 20 mmol potassium chloride solution, 1 M, was infused with the next infusion bottle. This was necessary in eight patients in the 0.9% saline group and in two patients in the Ringer's solution group.
For each sample, the strong ion difference (SID) was calculated as Na++ K+- Cl-- Lac-. The amount of weak plasma acid was calculated as the product of the serum total protein concentration (g/dl) and the empirically derived factor 2.43, according to van Slyke [12 ] and called "Prot-." The Bic (BicHH) and base excess (BE) were taken from the blood gas analyzer, which uses the Henderson-Hasselbalch Equation andthe formula of Siggaard-Andersen. [10 ] In addition, the Bic was calculated as the difference between SID and Prot-(BicS) using the Stewart model. The anion gap was calculated as Na++ K+- Cl-- BicHH.
Statistical Analysis 
Because all measured and calculated data described before were normally distributed (according to the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test), they are presented as mean values with standard deviations. For demographic data, Student t tests for unpaired data were performed. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance compared intragroup and intergroup differences at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min of crystalloid infusion with 0 min. Post hoc testing was performed according to the Student-Newman-Keuls method for multiple comparisons. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results 
(Table 1) presents patient characteristics. There were no significant differences in weight, height, body surface area, and time of infusion. Because of differences in the duration of surgery, individual differences occurred in infusion times. The total amount of fluid infused during this time was similar and amounted to a mean of approximately 6,000 ml in both groups. Because data for all patients are only complete to 120 min of infusion time beyond that point no mean values are presented (Figure 1). As shown in Table 1, at this point, the volume of crystalloid infusion in relation to body weight also was not significantly different in either groups and was in line with our planned infusion volume (noted previously). Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the groups with respect to estimated blood loss and urine production. The hemoglobin concentration decreased from approximately 12 g/dl to 9 g/dl in both groups (intergroup comparisons, P > 0.05; data not shown).
Table 1. Patient Characteristics 
Image not available
Table 1. Patient Characteristics 
×
Figure 1. Measured and calculated values (mean +/- SD) at the different measuring points. Saline group = white dots; Ringer's group = black dots. Star = intragroup differences, P < 0.05; triangle = intergroup differences, P < 0.05. 
Figure 1. Measured and calculated values (mean +/- SD) at the different measuring points. Saline group = white dots; Ringer's group = black dots. Star = intragroup differences, P < 0.05; triangle = intergroup differences, P < 0.05. 
Figure 1. Measured and calculated values (mean +/- SD) at the different measuring points. Saline group = white dots; Ringer's group = black dots. Star = intragroup differences, P < 0.05; triangle = intergroup differences, P < 0.05. 
×
In Figure 1, pH, PaCO(2), BE, Lac-, Na+, Cl-, SID, and Prot-are shown at the various measuring points described before. During infusion of the crystalloid solution, pH decreased significantly from 7.41 to 7.28 in the saline group. No major pH changes were observed in the patients who received Ringer's solution. In both groups, Pa (CO)(2) did not show major deviations from 40 mmHg. Changes in BE were similar to changes in pH. In the saline group, starting from a control value of -0.4 mM, BE decreased to -6.7 mM at 120 min. There were no major changes in BE in the Ringer's group. In the saline group, starting from a low level of 0.6 mM, Lac-decreased to a mean of 0.4 mM. During the infusion of lactated Ringer's solution, Lac-increased slightly to approximately 2 mM. Infusion of 0.9% saline solution led to a slow and continuous increase in Na+. There was a slight but significant decrease in Na+in the Ringer's group, in which the infused solution contained only 130 mM sodium. Cl-increased in both groups, but this increase was by far larger with the application of the 0.9% saline solution. During administration of 0.9% saline, Cl-increased from 104 mM to a mean of 115 mM. With the application of lactated Ringer's solution, which contained 112 mM chloride, a slight but significant increase in Cl-from 104 mM to 106 mM occurred. K (+)(data not shown) was maintained at a level of approximately 4 mM by substituting potassium as needed (see Materials and Methods), and it did not show any intragroup or intergroup differences.
The SID decreased initially in both groups. With a continuous 0.9% saline infusion, the decrease was significantly larger, approximately 9 mM, compared with the decrease that occurred with lactated Ringer's solution. Because of dilution with crystalloids and surgical bleeding, the serum total protein concentration decreased in both groups from a mean of approximately 6.2 g/dl to 4.3 g/dl. In Figure 1, the mean serum total protein concentration is presented as Prot-calculated with the factor 2.43, as described before. In Table 2, mean values for BicHH, BicS, anion gap, and the difference of anion gap and Prot-are shown. The mean values for BicHHand BicSwere virtually identical in both groups. It should be noted that BicHHrepresents the gold standard calculation using the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation, whereas BicSwas obtained using only Na+, K+, Cl-, Lac-, and Prot-. In the saline group, BicHHand BicSdecreased from approximately 23 mM to 18 mM. No major changes in BicHHand BicSoccurred in the Ringer's solution group. The anion gap showed similar changes in both groups, with a decrease from approximately 16 mM to 12 mM during the period of crystalloid infusion. The difference of anion gap and Prot-was slightly positive in both observation groups at all measuring points, with nearly identical values in both groups and a slight increase from approximately 1 mM to 2 mM during the observation period.
Table 2. Calculated Bicarbonate According to Henderson-Hasselbach (Bic HH) and Stewart (Bic S), Anion Gap and Difference between Anion Gap and Prot- 
Image not available
Table 2. Calculated Bicarbonate According to Henderson-Hasselbach (Bic HH) and Stewart (Bic S), Anion Gap and Difference between Anion Gap and Prot- 
×
Discussion 
The main finding of this study was a rather impressive acidosis (7.41 to 7.28) after a relatively brief interval (2 h) of 0.9% saline infusion, but not after lactated Ringer's solution infusion at rates of approximately 35 ml [middle dot] kg-1[middle dot] h-1during anesthesia and surgery. This acidosis with the 0.9% saline infusion clearly had a metabolic origin, because PaCO(2) was kept constant and there was no lactic acidosis, because Lac-even decreased slightly. Although described before, [2–4 ] there seems to be great uncertainty about the effects of large 0.9% saline infusions on acid-base balance, as shown by a few recent case reports [5–8 ] and several letters to the editor. [13–17 ] Our finding of metabolic acidosis associated with 0.9% saline, but not with lactated Ringer's solution, can be interpreted in two ways, and they seem to be contradictory. [18 ] The conventional Henderson-Hasselbalch or Siggaard-Andersen approach [10 ] tells us that metabolic acidosis occurred in the saline group as shown by constant PaCO(2) and decreasing BicHHand BE, whereas in the Ringer's group no significant change occurred in the acid-base balance. Undoubtedly, hyperchloremia would be identified as the main cause of this metabolic acidosis.
The Stewart approach, which is discussed in detail elsewhere, [19 ] defines PaCO(2), SID, and the sum of all anionic charges of weak plasma acids (called Atotby Stewart and calculated in the way we calculated Prot-) as independent pH-regulating variables, whereas pH and the Bic are dependent variables. [11 ] The Stewart approach has been applied less commonly in the last decade. Only a few studies in exercise medicine, [20,21 ] experimental medicine, [22 ] and critical care medicine [23–26 ] have used this model. In discussing this model, two methodologic aspects are important: our method of measuring lactate, and the estimation of the anionic component of weak plasma acids in conjunction with the problem of undefined cations and anions.
First, the lactate electrode incorporated in the blood gas and electrolyte analyzer used in this study measures L (+) lactate, which is the form that naturally occurs in blood. The lactated Ringer's solution used in this study (27 mM lactate) is racemic, with L (+) lactate being the dominant fraction. Analyzing this product provided lactate values of approximately 21 mM for pure solution, approximately 12 mM for a 1:1 dilution with normal saline, and 2.5 mM for a 1:10 dilution with saline. Therefore, the values for Lac-shown in Figure 1and used to calculate SID might be correct indeed.
Second, estimating the net anionic charges of weak plasma acids by multiplying the serum total protein concentration (g/dl) by 2.43, according to van Slyke, [12 ] is a simplification. Figge et al. [27,28 ] have shown that only plasma albumin, but not the globulins, bear negative charges. The authors developed a rather complicated mathematical model to calculate the weak acid component from plasma albumin and plasma phosphate concentrations. However, Kowalchuk and Scheuermann [21 ] used both ways to estimate the weak acid component in heavily exercising humans and did not find relevant differences between measured and calculated values of pH and the Bic using the van Slyke factor versus the Figge model. Another indication that our values for Prot-might be a reasonable estimate of the weak acid component of our patients comes from the finding that, in this study, the anion gap closely reflected changes in serum total protein concentration and therefore Prot-(Table 2). The fact that throughout the study period there was only a slightly positive mean difference between the anion gap and Prot-of 1 or 2 mM in both groups also implies that there should have been a nearly equal amount of unidentified cations and anions in our patients.
(Figure 2) illustrates changes in BicHHand BicS, and therefore in pH, in the context of SID and Prot-, according to the Stewart model. Variables in Figure 2were calculated using mean values of the two groups after 120 min of crystalloid infusion time compared with the corresponding baseline values. With the 0.9% saline infusion, changes in Bic were accompanied by a profound decrease in SID by approximately 9 mM and were probably attenuated by a simultaneous decrease in Prot-. In the Ringer's group, SID and Prot-decreased nearly to the same amount, and the Bic was virtually unchanged with the crystalloid infusion. Whether the Henderson-Hasselbalch approach or the Stewart model is more valuable in interpreting and understanding acid-base changes resulting from crystalloid infusion can be debated.
Figure 2. Changes in the serum bicarbonate concentration shown using the Henderson-Hasselbach equation (BicHH) or the Stewart formula (BicS) and of the strong ion difference and Prot-after 120 min of 0.9% saline or lactated Ringer's solution compared with respective baseline values. 
Figure 2. Changes in the serum bicarbonate concentration shown using the Henderson-Hasselbach equation (BicHH) or the Stewart formula (BicS) and of the strong ion difference and Prot-after 120 min of 0.9% saline or lactated Ringer's solution compared with respective baseline values. 
Figure 2. Changes in the serum bicarbonate concentration shown using the Henderson-Hasselbach equation (BicHH) or the Stewart formula (BicS) and of the strong ion difference and Prot-after 120 min of 0.9% saline or lactated Ringer's solution compared with respective baseline values. 
×
Hyperchloremic acidosis caused by large 0.9% saline infusions seems to be benign, unless it is confused with hypoperfusion. The pH values greater than 7.20 do not seem to have major pathophysiologic implications in the clinical setting we describe. Nevertheless, we believe that hyperchloremic acidosis caused by a 0.9% saline infusion should be treated to provide a BE close to zero at the end of surgery (or, alternatively, lactated Ringer's solution should be used). In our experience in the early postoperative period, metabolic acidosis caused by hyperchloremia and respiratory acidosis caused by opiate analgesics may become additive and result in pH values much less than 7.20. A systematic analysis of this topic might provide valuable information.
REFERENCES 
REFERENCES 
Lee JA: Sydney Ringer (1834-1910) and Alexis Hartmann (1898-1964). Anaesthesia 1981; 36:1115-21
Shires GT, Holman J: Dilution acidosis. Ann Intern Med 1948; 28:557-9
Rosenbaum BJ, Makoff DL, Maxwell MH: Acid base and electrolytes changes induced by acute isotonic saline infusion in the nephrectomized dog. J Lab Clin Med 1969; 74:427-35
Garella S, Tzamaloukas AH, Chazan JA: Effect of isotonic volume expansion on extracellular bicarbonate stores in normal dogs. Am J Physiol 1973; 225:628-36
Goodkin DA, Raja RM, Saven A: Dilutional acidosis. South Med J 1990; 83:354-5
Azzam FJ, Steinhardt GF, Tracy TF, Gabriel KR: Transient perioperative metabolic acidosis in a patient with ileal bladder augmentation. Anesthesiology 1995; 83:198-200
Mathes DD, Morell RC, Rohr MS: Dilutional acidosis: Is it a real clinical entity? Anesthesiology 1997; 86:501-3
Jaber BL, Madias NE: Marked dilutional acidosis complicating management of right ventricular myocardial infarction. Am J Kid Dis 1997; 30:561-7
Peters J, van Slyke DD: Quantitative Clinical Chemistry: Interpretations, Volume 1, 1st Edition. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1946
Sigaard-Andersen O: The Acid-Base Status of the Blood, 4th Edition. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1976
Stewart PA: Modern quantitative acid-base chemistry. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1983; 61:1444-61
Van Slyke DD, Hastings AB, Hiller A, Sendroy J: Studies of gas and electrolyte equibrilia in blood. XIV. Amount of alkali bound by serum albumin and globulin. J Biol Chem 1928; 79:769-80
Miller LR, Waters LH, Provost C: Mechanism of hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis (letter). Anesthesiology 1996; 84:482-3
Miller LR, Waters JH: Mechanism of hyperchloremic nonaniongap acidosis (letter). Anesthesiology 1997; 87:1009-10
Russo MA: Dilutional acidosis: A nonentity (letter)? Anesthesiology 1997; 87:1010-1
Dorje P, Adhikary G, McLaren ID: Dilutional acidosis or altered strong ion difference (letter)? Anesthesiology 1997; 87:1011-2
Kohrasani A, Appavu SK: Decrease in the total amount of extracellular bicarbonate is not dilution (letter). Anesthesiology 1997; 87:1012-3
Siggaard-Andersen O, Fogh-Andersen N: Base excess or buffer base (strong ion difference) as measure of a non-respiratory acid-base disturbance. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1975; 107(suppl):123-8
Fencl V, Leith DE: Stewart's quantitative acid-base chemistry: Applications in biology and medicine. Resp Physiol 1993; 91:1-16
Weinstein Y, Magazanik A, Grodjinovsky A, Inbar O, Dlin RA, Stewart PA: Reexamination of Stewart's quantitative analysis of acid-base status. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23:1270-5
Kowalchuk JM, Scheuermann BW: Acid-base regulation: A comparison of quantitative methods. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1994; 72:818-26
Waters JH, Scanlon TS, Howard RS, Leivers D: Role of minor electrolytes when applied to Stewart's acid-base approach in an acidotic rabbit model. Anesth Analg 1995; 81:1043-51
McAuliffe JJ, Lind LJ, Leith DE, Fencl V: Hypoproteinemic alkalosis. Am J Med 1986; 81:86-90
Fencl V, Rossing TH: Acid-base disorders in critical care medicine. Ann Rev Med 1989; 40:17-29
Alfaro V, Torras R, Ibanez J, Palacios L: A physical-chemical analysis of the acid-base response to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1996; 74:1229-35
Kellum JA: New insights in acid-base physiology applied to critical care. Curr Opinion Crit Care 1997; 3414-9
Figge J, Rossing TH, Fencl V: The role of serum proteins in acid-base equilibria. J Lab Clin Med 1991; 117:453-67
Figge J, Mydosh T, Fencl V: Serum proteins and acid-base equilibria: A follow-up. J Lab Clin Med 1992; 120:713-9
Figure 1. Measured and calculated values (mean +/- SD) at the different measuring points. Saline group = white dots; Ringer's group = black dots. Star = intragroup differences, P < 0.05; triangle = intergroup differences, P < 0.05. 
Figure 1. Measured and calculated values (mean +/- SD) at the different measuring points. Saline group = white dots; Ringer's group = black dots. Star = intragroup differences, P < 0.05; triangle = intergroup differences, P < 0.05. 
Figure 1. Measured and calculated values (mean +/- SD) at the different measuring points. Saline group = white dots; Ringer's group = black dots. Star = intragroup differences, P < 0.05; triangle = intergroup differences, P < 0.05. 
×
Figure 2. Changes in the serum bicarbonate concentration shown using the Henderson-Hasselbach equation (BicHH) or the Stewart formula (BicS) and of the strong ion difference and Prot-after 120 min of 0.9% saline or lactated Ringer's solution compared with respective baseline values. 
Figure 2. Changes in the serum bicarbonate concentration shown using the Henderson-Hasselbach equation (BicHH) or the Stewart formula (BicS) and of the strong ion difference and Prot-after 120 min of 0.9% saline or lactated Ringer's solution compared with respective baseline values. 
Figure 2. Changes in the serum bicarbonate concentration shown using the Henderson-Hasselbach equation (BicHH) or the Stewart formula (BicS) and of the strong ion difference and Prot-after 120 min of 0.9% saline or lactated Ringer's solution compared with respective baseline values. 
×
Table 1. Patient Characteristics 
Image not available
Table 1. Patient Characteristics 
×
Table 2. Calculated Bicarbonate According to Henderson-Hasselbach (Bic HH) and Stewart (Bic S), Anion Gap and Difference between Anion Gap and Prot- 
Image not available
Table 2. Calculated Bicarbonate According to Henderson-Hasselbach (Bic HH) and Stewart (Bic S), Anion Gap and Difference between Anion Gap and Prot- 
×