Free
Correspondence  |   April 2000
Acute Pulmonary Edema Caused by Impaired Switching from Nasal to Oral Breathing in the Emergence from Anesthesia
Author Notes
  • Instructor
  • Professor and Chair
  • shu-dohi@cc.gifu-u.ac.jp
  • Assistant Professor
  • Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine
  • Gifu University School of Medicine
  • Vice Director
  • Department of Anesthesia
  • Gifu City Hospital
  • Gifu City
  • Gifu, Japan
Article Information
Correspondence
Correspondence   |   April 2000
Acute Pulmonary Edema Caused by Impaired Switching from Nasal to Oral Breathing in the Emergence from Anesthesia
Anesthesiology 4 2000, Vol.92, 1209. doi:
Anesthesiology 4 2000, Vol.92, 1209. doi:
To the Editor:—
Pulmonary edema occurs because of excessive negative intrathoracic pressure caused by acute airway obstruction (e.g.,  laryngospasm, vocal cord paralysis) in spontaneously breathing patients. 1–4 During anesthesia and sedation, airway obstruction can occur at the pharynx and larynx levels. 5,6 Even in patients who are awake, alteration in the ability to change the breathing route from nasal to oral may affect breathing against the airway obstruction, thereby causing this catastrophic event. 7 We experienced a case in which acute pulmonary edema occurred because of acute airway obstruction triggered by the patient’s inability to switch the breathing route from nasal to oral during emergence from propofol anesthesia.
A 27-yr-old man (170 cm, 60 kg) with chronic tonsillitis scheduled for bilateral tonsillectomy was medicated with hydroxyzine and atropine 30 min before anesthesia. Air passage through the nose was normal. After placement of the electrocardiograph, pulse oxymeter (oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry, SpO2), and blood pressure cuff, general anesthesia was induced with 2 mg/kg intravenous propofol and was maintained with continuous intravenous propofol, nitrous oxide, and oxygen supplemented with fentanyl. The patient’s trachea was intubated with a 7.5-mm endotracheal tube with the aid of vecronium for muscle relaxation; the lungs were mechanically ventilated. A bilateral tonsillectomy was performed uneventfully, using 13 ml local-infiltration epinephrine 0.0005%. Because bleeding persisted, the surgeon replaced a mouth gag several times for hemostasis; thus, the procedure was accomplished in 180 min, during which time 2 mg · kg−1· h−1propofol supplemented with 0.2% isoflurane was maintained.
The patient began controlled mechanical ventilation, and his vital signs were stable until tracheal extubation after full recovery from neuromuscle blockade. He could raise his head, and he responded well to our commands. The patient then fell asleep, and his airway was obstructed. When the patient awoke to our verbal commands, he was able to breathe orally without difficulty; however, when he slept, he could only breathe through the nasal route. The nasal breathing was accompanied by signs of complete airway obstruction, such as sternal retraction and use of the accessory muscles. With each awakening, he breathed through the oral route, and the obstructive breathing disappeared. After several such episodes SpO2decreased to less than 90%, and finally to 84%, despite oxygen supplement through a face mask. A chest roentgenogram showed diffuse interstitial edema in his lungs. The patient had a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mask with oxygen on overnight. The next morning, his lungs became clear, and there was neither a significant decrease in SpO2associated with spontaneous breathing nor an episode of upper airway obstruction during sleep. The patient’s recovery was uneventful.
Pulmonary edema in the postoperative period often is caused by excessive negative intrathoracic pressure generated during inspiratory efforts against acute upper airway obstruction, 1–3 mainly caused by laryngospasm in healthy male patients. 4 However, laryngospasm did not occur in this patient, although, in patients anesthetized with propofol, vigorous airway reflexes could be elicited by laryngeal stimulation. 8 Similarly, closure or paradoxic movements of the vocal cord could be excluded as a factor because the obstruction was above the vocal cords.
There could be many factors that cause partial obstruction of the upper airway after tonsillectomy. Edema in the velopharyngeal area and tongue base could have occurred because of the prolonged procedure in this patient, thereby narrowing the nasal breathing. During sleep, upper airway obstruction usually occurs at the velopharyngeal level and leads to nasal airway obstruction; switching the breathing route from the obstructed nasal route to the oral route is crucial for maintaining a patent airway. Because this switching mechanism is believed to be an upper airway reflex, impairment of any part of the reflex arc might have caused the delayed switch from nasal to oral breathing observed in this patient. For example, airway anesthesia of the nasal passage delays the shift to oral breathing in response to acute nasal obstruction. 9 Upper airway edema also might impair airway receptor function in this palatoglossal area, and residual general anesthetics can depress the arousal function. Residual muscular blockade might also impair upper airway muscle function. Moreover, propofol per se  has been reported to cause velopharyngeal narrowing. 10 Although propofol seems unlikely to affect spontaneous inspiratory and expiratory times, 11 it may affect coordinated movements of respiratory muscles. During sleep, upper airway obstruction at the retropalantal level may be related to an imbalance between the activity of the levator and the tensor palatini. Both muscles are reflex activated by negative pressure in humans. 12 During oral breathing, levator palatini activity is increased significantly compared with nasal breathing, suggesting that the levator palatini lifts the soft palate upward and separates the nasopharynx from the oropharynx, at the same time pulling the palatal arches apart and upward, thus creating a patent oropharynx. 12 If the velopharyngeal occlusion occurs without the change from nasal to oral breathing, complete airway obstruction results. The current patient was able to release the upper airway obstruction exclusively in response to the commands to breathe orally. This suggests that the ability to change the breathing route was impaired, probably because of sedation with propofol.
We are not certain whether patients with enlarged tonsils, who might normally be unable to breathe via  the nasal route, would have difficulty associated with the impaired ability to change the breathing route after tonsillectomy. However, because airway obstruction of the nasal route frequently occurs during emergence from anesthesia, especially after adenoidectomy or tonsillectomy, and because the switch from nasal to oral breathing is accomplished only when the patient awakens, one should be aware that disability or delay of switching from the nasal to the oral breathing route may provoke pulmonary edema.
References
Willms D, Shure D: Pulmonary edema due to upper airway obstruction in adults. Chest 1988; 94:1090–2Willms, D Shure, D
Dohi S, Okubo N, Kondo Y: Pulmonary edema after airway obstruction due to bilateral vocal cord paralysis. Can J Anaesth 1991; 38:492–5Dohi, S Okubo, N Kondo, Y
Brandom BW: Pulmonary edema after airway obstruction. Int Anesthesiol Clin 1997; 35:75–84Brandom, BW
Deepika K, Kenaan CA, Barrocas AM, Fonseca JJ, Bikazi GB: Negative pressure pulmonary edema after acute upper airway obstruction. J Clin Anesth 1997; 9:403–8Deepika, K Kenaan, CA Barrocas, AM Fonseca, JJ Bikazi, GB
Nishino T, Kochi T: Effect of sedation produced by thiopentone on responses to nasal occlusion in female adults. Br J Anaesth 1993; 71:388–92Nishino, T Kochi, T
Oshima T, Masaki Y, Toyooka H: Flumazenil antagonized midazolam-induced airway narrowing during nasal breathing in humans. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82:698–702Oshima, T Masaki, Y Toyooka, H
Meissner HH, Robinson L, Dubinett SM, Santiago SM: Pulmonary edema as a result of chronic upper airway obstruction. Respir Med 1998; 92:1174–6Meissner, HH Robinson, L Dubinett, SM Santiago, SM
Tagaito Y, Isono S, Nishino T: Upper airway reflexes during a combination of propofol and fentanyl anesthesia. A NESTHESIOLOGY 1998; 88:1459–66Tagaito, Y Isono, S Nishino, T
Nishino T, Sugiyama A, Tanaka A, Ishikawa T: Effects of topical nasal anasthesia on shift of breathing route in adults. Lancet 1992; 339:1497–500Nishino, T Sugiyama, A Tanaka, A Ishikawa, T
Mathru M, Esch O, Lang J, Herbert ME, Chaljub G, Goodacre B, van Sonnenberg E: Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper airway: Effect of propofol anesthesia and nasal continuous positive airway pressure in humans. A NESTHESIOLOGY 1996; 84:273–9Mathru, M Esch, O Lang, J Herbert, ME Chaljub, G Goodacre, B van Sonnenberg, E
Goodman NW, Vanner RG, Wade JA: Effects of incremental doses of alfentanil and propofol on the breathing of anesthetized patients. Br J Anaesth 1989; 63:548–53Goodman, NW Vanner, RG Wade, JA
Mortimore IL, Mathur R, Douglas NJ: Effect of posture, route of respiration, and negative pressure on palatal muscle activity in humans. J Appl Physiol 1995; 79:448–54Mortimore, IL Mathur, R Douglas, NJ