Free
Correspondence  |   January 2000
Was Chloroform Produced before 1831?
Author Notes
  • Professor
  • Department of Anesthesiology
  • Librarian
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Birmingham, Alabama 35249-6810
  • pat.thompson@ccc.uab.edu
Article Information
Correspondence
Correspondence   |   January 2000
Was Chloroform Produced before 1831?
Anesthesiology 1 2000, Vol.92, 290. doi:
Anesthesiology 1 2000, Vol.92, 290. doi:
To the Editor:—
In late 1831, Guthrie, Soubeiran, and Liebig independently reported their discovery of a compound obtained by distilling a mixture of concentrated ethyl alcohol and chloride of lime (CaCOCl2). 1–3 In 1834, Dumas elicited the product’s chemical formula (CHCl3) and named it chloroform. 1–3 Soubeiran and Liebig realized that they had discovered a new compound, but Guthrie thought he had found a simpler and cheaper method of producing chloric ether. 4 He learned of chloric ether and its potential medical use as a stimulant in the 1831 edition of Silliman’s Elements of Chemistry  5 and was interested in the product’s commercial exploitation. 4 
Although the fall of 1831 is commonly accepted as the date of its discovery, 1–3 chloroform seems to have been produced at least 1 yr earlier, in mid-1830, by the German Moldenhawer. 6,7 Moldenhawer, a pharmacist in Frankfurt/Oder, published in the early fall of 1830 a new process for removing the contaminant fusel oil from ethyl alcohol prepared from potatoes. 7 In reviewing the various methods used to purify alcohol, Moldenhawer mentioned Zeise’s procedure 8 of adding one-fourth loth (2.5 g) of chloride of lime to one quart (1 l) of ethyl alcohol, shaking the mixture frequently and vigorously for 20–24 h, and distilling out the alcohol (loth and quart were German measures of that period.) Moldenhawer judged Zeise’s method to be inadequate; he had found fusel oil in the distillate and none in the residue. He had also noticed that the vigorous shaking of the mixture released the strong odor of what he thought to be chloric ether (chloräther in German). Moldenhawer thus seems to have produced chloroform. Like Guthrie, he mistook the substance for chloric ether because of a similar smell.
In 1794, a group of Dutch chemists, 9 mixing equal volumes of ethylene (C2H4) and chlorine (C12), obtained an ethereal liquid initially called oil of the Dutch chemists (1,2-dichloroethane). In 1816, Robiquet and Colin 10 analyzed the composition and properties of the Dutch liquid, named it hydrochloric ether, and suggested its use as a medicinal stimulant. Thomson, professor of chemistry at the University of Glasgow, described the compound in the 1820 edition of his System of Chemistry  11 and renamed it chloric ether. The name chloric ether was adopted by Silliman in the 1831 edition of his Elements of Chemistry.  5 
Chloräther (1,2-dichloroethane) was well known in the German chemical literature at the time of Moldenhawer’s publication. 12,13 His article 7 shows an extensive knowledge of the contemporary chemical literature. He also must have experimented with chloric ether because he thought that he had noticed its smell in the mixture of alcohol and chloride of lime he had tested. Had he investigated the compound whose odor he had detected, or at least reported his discovery more extensively, he may have been the first discoverer of chloroform. Zeise, who mixed alcohol and chloride of lime even before Moldenhawer, may also have fortuitously produced chloroform, but the details and the date of his experiments remain unknown.
The authors thank Prof. Dr. H. W. Rösky (Göttingen); the librarians, J. Linder and S. Renner (Heidelberg); L. Künstling (Hannover); and S. Schmidt, Rohland (Leipzig) for their kind and generous help with the old German references.
References
Keys TE: The History of Surgical Anesthesia. Huntington, NY, RE Krieger, 1978, p 33
Duncum BM: The Development of Inhalation Anaesthesia. London, Royal Society of Medicine Press, 1994, pp 171–3
Robinson V: Victory Over Pain. London, Sigma, 1947, pp 182–6
Guthrie S: New mode of preparing a spirituous solution of chloric ether. Am J Sci Arts 1832; 21:64–5Guthrie, S
Silliman B: Elements of Chemistry vol (vol 2). New Haven, H. Howe, 1831, pp 19–20
Speter M: Liebig oder Soubeiran? Zur 100-jährigen Entdeckung des chloroforms. Chemiker Zeitung 1931; 55:781–2Speter, M
Moldenhawer Verfahren den Spiritus von dem Fuselöl auf leichte Weise zu befreien. Magazin für Pharmacie 1830; 8:222–7Moldenhawer,
Brandes R: Repertorium für die Chemie als Wissenschaft und Kunst (vol 1). Hannover, FU Bock, 1826, pp 121–3
Deiman JR, Paets van Troostwijck A, Bondt N, Lauwerenburgh A: Recherches sur les diverses especes des gaz qu’ on obtient en melant l’acide sulfurique concentre avec l’alcool. J Physique Chimie 1794; 45:178–91Deiman, JR Paets van Troostwijck, A Bondt, N Lauwerenburgh, A
Robiquet, Colin: Recherches sur la nature de la matiere huileuse des chimistes hollandais. Annal Chim Phys 1816; 1:337–45
Thomson T: A System of Chemistry, 6th Edition. Edinburgh, Blackwood, Bell, and Bladflute, 1820, pp 237–8
Berzelius JJ trans, Wöhler F: Lehrbuch der Chemie. Dresden, Arnold, 1825, 1 (1), pp 284–6
Turner E trans, Hartmann KFH: Lehrbuch der Chemie. Leipzig, FU Bock, 1829, pp 275–6