Free
Meeting Abstracts  |   January 2000
Tonic Blocking Action of Meperidine on Na+and K+Channels in Amphibian Peripheral Nerves
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Michael E. Bräu, P.D., Dr.med.
    *
  • E. Dietlind Koch, Dr.med.
  • Werner Vogel, Prof.Dr.rer.nat.
  • Gunter Hempelmann, Prof.Dr.med., Dr.h.c.
    §
  • *Anesthesiologist. †Postdoctoral Fellow. ‡Professor of Physiology. §Professor and Chair of Anesthesia.
Article Information
Meeting Abstracts   |   January 2000
Tonic Blocking Action of Meperidine on Na+and K+Channels in Amphibian Peripheral Nerves
Anesthesiology 1 2000, Vol.92, 147. doi:
Anesthesiology 1 2000, Vol.92, 147. doi:
LOCAL anesthetic agents are well known to interrupt impulse conduction in peripheral nerve axons when applied locally in high concentrations. The phenylpiperidine opioid meperidine, in addition to its systemic opioid effect, also shows local anesthetic–like action when applied directly to peripheral nerves. Using this effect, in vivo  studies have demonstrated that intrathecally applied meperidine gives sufficient nerve block to perform surgery of the lower limbs 1 or the perineum, 2 Cesarean section, 3 and urologic surgery. 4,5 Intravenous regional anesthesia also has been conducted with meperidine, either in addition to local anesthetic agents 6 or as the sole agent. 7 Several in vitro  studies have demonstrated that the local anesthetic–like effect of meperidine is attributable to its ability to block impulse conduction in isolated peripheral nerves 8 or dorsal root axons. 9 
Local anesthetic agents are known to block impulse conduction by inhibiting voltage-dependent Na+channels in a reversible and concentration-dependent manner. In addition to the tonic block observed at low-stimulation frequencies, these drugs produce additional block at high-stimulation frequencies called use-dependent or phasic block. 10 In addition, different K+channels are inhibited by local anesthetic agents, which may play a role for inhibiting axonal conduction. 11,12 Regarding local anesthetic agents, the underlying mechanism for conduction block by meperidine is its Na+channel–blocking property; voltage-dependent K+channels also are affected. 13 
Other opioids, such as morphine, fentanyl, and sufentanil, also exert local anesthetic–like effects when administered in high concentrations. 14,15 In addition to a nonspecific blocking effect, it is postulated that conduction block in peripheral nerve by meperidine is mediated via  opioid receptors. 16 
The axonal patch–clamp method 17 allows discrimination among different peripheral nerve ion channels and enables pharmacologic studies of each channel type to be performed. 18 Using this method, in the current study, we investigated the blocking potency of meperidine on Na+and different K+currents of amphibian peripheral nerves on the single channel level.
Materials and Methods
Preparation
The patch–clamp method 19 was applied to sciatic nerves 17 of the clawed toad Xenopus laevis  . Animals were killed by decapitation. These procedures were reported to the local veterinarian authority and were in accordance with German guidelines. Nerves were dissected and desheathed mechanically and incubated with 3 mg/ml collagenase (Worthington type CLS II; Biochrom, Berlin, Germany) in Ringer’s solution for 135 min and subsequently with 1 mg/ml protease (type XXIV; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) in Ca2+-free Ringer’s solution for 35 min. The temperature was kept constant at 24°C. Next, the preparation was washed in Ca2+-free Ringer’s solution, cut into 3-mm-long segments, and put into a culture dish that had been coated with laboratory grease (Glisseal Blue; Borer Chemie, Solothurn, Switzerland). After 30 min of rest, axons were used for up to 10 h.
Solutions
Experiments were performed with different external solutions containing (in mM) 110 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 5 BES (N,N-bis[2-hydroxyethyl]-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid; Ringer’s solution), and either 100 nM tetrodotoxin (Ri-TTX; Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany) or 10 mM tetraethylammoniumchloride (Ri-TEA), all adjusted to p  H 7.4 with tris[hydroxymethyl]aminomethane (TRIS) base. In some experiments, an external solution with an increased concentration of K+has been used (105 mM Ko), containing 105 KCl, 13 NaCl, 2 CaCl2, 5 BES, and 100 nM TTX.
The internal solution contained (in mM) 105 KCl, 13 NaCl, 5 BES, 3 EGTA adjusted to p  H 7.2 with TRIS base (KCli) or CsCl instead of KCl for the investigation of Na+current (CsCli). Meperidine was obtained as a commercial preparation (Dolantin; Hoechst, Bad Soden, Germany) that did not contain other ingredients except water. Lidocaine was obtained from Sigma (Deisenhofen, Germany). Control solution and different test solutions were applied to excised outside-out patches by a multiple barrel perfusion system.
Electrophysiologic Recording
All experiments were performed using outside-out patches formed from the membrane of partially demyelinated axons. Patch pipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass tubes (GC 150; Clark Electromedical Instruments, Pangbourne, United Kingdom), coated with Sylgard 184 (Dow Corning, Seneffe, Belgium), and fire-polished before the experiment. The pipettes had a resistance of 4–20 MΩ. Voltage clamp was performed by an EPC 7 patch–clamp amplifier (List, Darmstadt, Germany). Voltage-dependent currents were filtered at 3 kHz with a four-pole low-pass Bessel filter, digitized at 10 kHz with a Labmaster TM-40 analog-digital/digital-analog board (Scientific Solutions, Solon, OH) and stored on the hard disk of an IBM-compatible computer. Traces of voltage-independent currents were stored on videotape using a modified PCM-501ES pulse code modulation unit (Sony, Tokyo, Japan) and processed offline later. Recordings were made at 14 ± 1°C. Membrane potentials (E) are given for the inner side with respect to the outer side of the membrane.
Na+currents were investigated in outside-out patches formed from the membrane of the nodal region of the axon. Ri-TEA was used as the external and CsClias the pipette solution. In voltage–clamp mode, the membrane holding potential was set to −90 mV. To remove fast inactivation of the Na+channels completely, a 50-ms prepulse to −130 mV was applied before a 50-ms depolarizing test pulse to −40 mV elicited Na+currents. To reduce noise originating from random channel openings in subsequent traces, 20 traces of Na+currents were averaged before the peak Na+current was measured to quantify fractional block in given drug concentrations. These data were used to construct concentration–inhibition curves, which were then fitted with to obtain half-maximal inhibiting concentration (IC50) values.
For the investigation of voltage-dependent K+currents (KDR), Ri-TTX was used as the bath and KClias the pipette solution. Holding potential was −90 mV; a 50-ms test pulse to 0 mV elicited K+currents. Twenty traces were averaged, and the steady-state K+outward current was measured during the last 20 ms of the averaged trace. Concentration–effect relations were evaluated similarly for Na+channels.
The calcium-dependent K+channel (KCa) was investigated in outside-out patches at a holding potential of +40 mV. At this potential, other KDRinactivated after 1 min and thereafter made no contribution to the current. The bath solution was Ri-TTX, and the pipette solution was KCli, which contained 100 μM CaCl2to activate KCacurrents. For analysis, current traces of at least 30 s in control solution and in different concentrations of drug were filtered at 1 kHz and digitized at 5 kHz offline from videotape. The mean current of a trace was then calculated as the average of all sample points in the trace. Dividing the mean current in drug by the mean current in control solution and subtracting the result from 1 yields fractional block.
To study flicker K+background channels (Kfli), outside-out patches were formed on thin axons (≈5 μm outer diameter). The holding potential was −90 mV, and no test pulse was applied. The bath solution was 105 mM Ko, and the pipette solution was KCli. Fractional block was measured as described earlier.
Statistical Analysis
Current records were analyzed using pClamp 5.5.1 software (Axon Instruments, Burlingame, CA). Data points and error bars are given either as mean ± SEM or as fitted values ± SE (standard error of fit). Statistical analysis, fits, and preparation of the figures were accomplished with Fig.P 6.0 software (Biosoft, Cambridge, United Kingdom).
To quantify block, concentration–effect curves were constructed by measuring the fractional block (fb) in dependence of certain drug concentrations (c). A nonlinear least-squares fit of the data points to MATH 1was then performed to obtain the IC50values and the maximal achievable block (bmax).
To determine whether meperidine and lidocaine act at the same binding site on the Na+channel, we performed competition experiments with these two agents. 20 In these experiments, Na+channels were preblocked with certain concentrations of lidocaine (clido). Concentration–effect relations with the partially blocked channels reveal apparent IC50values for meperidine (IC50,meperidine,app) depending on the fraction of channels blocked previously by lidocaine and on the number of binding sites. Competition forthe same binding site results in a shift of the IC50,meperidine,appvalue according to MATH 2where IC50,lidoand IC50,meperidineare the IC50values for lidocaine and meperidine, respectively, as evaluated from concentration–inhibition relations. If the two substances act at different binding sites, no shift should occur; however, possible allosteric interactions have not been considered in this model.
Results
With outside-out patches, formed at the nodal membrane of partially demyelinated axons, voltage-dependent Na+currents were investigated after blocking K+currents with external TEA and internal Cs+. The Na+peak inward current in response to a test pulse was in the range of 20–150 pA, corresponding to approximately 20–150 channels simultaneously open at the peak. 17 Random openings of the small number of Na+channels present in the outside-out patches resulted in fluctuations in amplitude of successive traces, which had to be smoothed by averaging procedures before measurement of peak current. This hindered investigation of use-dependent (phasic) block, which is measured as an increase of Na+current inhibition during successive membrane depolarizations at high frequency. We therefore were able to measure tonic block at only low depolarization frequencies.
Meperidine reduced the peak amplitude in a concentration-dependent manner (fig. 1A) in the same concentration range as the local anesthetic agent lidocaine (fig. 1B). The block was always fully reversible for both substances. To compare the potencies of meperidine and lidocaine, fractional block of the peak amplitude was plotted against the concentration of blocker (fig. 1C). Concentrations of meperidine ranged from 1 nM to 3 mM to investigate its effect in a broad range. Fitting to the data revealed IC50values of 164 ± 14 μM (n = 10) for meperidine and 172 ± 9 μM (n = 5) for lidocaine. Block was complete at high concentrations of meperidine and lidocaine (maximal block [fbmax] fixed to 1 for fitting).
Fig. 1. Effects of meperidine and lidocaine on axonal Na+currents. Traces show multiple channel Na+currents recorded in (A  ) control and 100 and 300 μM meperidine, and (B  ) control and 100 and 300 μM lidocaine and after wash. The pulse protocol is given in text. Traces represent averages of 20 recordings. Holding potential was set to −90 mV, and a 50-ms prepulse to −130 mV was applied to remove fast inactivation, followed by a 50-ms test pulse to −40 mV. Bath, Ri-TEA; pipette, CsCli. (C  ) Concentration dependence of Na+channel block by externally applied meperidine (circles) and lidocaine (diamonds) were derived from experiments as shown in A  and B  . Fractional block was obtained by measuring the reduction of peak current and is plotted versus  concentration of meperidine and lidocaine, respectively. The cross marks half-maximal concentration (IC50). (D  ) Simultaneous application of meperidine and lidocaine. Ordinate gives apparent IC50values of meperidine obtained from concentration–effect experiments for meperidine during which various concentrations of lidocaine (abscissa) were present. Dashed lines show the theoretical change of the apparent meperidine IC50in dependence of the simultaneously present concentrations of lidocaine assuming models of either competition of both drugs for one binding site (equation 2) or of two independent binding sites (no change). Dotted lines give 95% confidence intervals for the data. (C  and D  ) Error bars show SEM if larger than symbol size, and the number of experiments is given above each data point.
Fig. 1. Effects of meperidine and lidocaine on axonal Na+currents. Traces show multiple channel Na+currents recorded in (A 
	) control and 100 and 300 μM meperidine, and (B 
	) control and 100 and 300 μM lidocaine and after wash. The pulse protocol is given in text. Traces represent averages of 20 recordings. Holding potential was set to −90 mV, and a 50-ms prepulse to −130 mV was applied to remove fast inactivation, followed by a 50-ms test pulse to −40 mV. Bath, Ri-TEA; pipette, CsCli. (C 
	) Concentration dependence of Na+channel block by externally applied meperidine (circles) and lidocaine (diamonds) were derived from experiments as shown in A 
	and B 
	. Fractional block was obtained by measuring the reduction of peak current and is plotted versus 
	concentration of meperidine and lidocaine, respectively. The cross marks half-maximal concentration (IC50). (D 
	) Simultaneous application of meperidine and lidocaine. Ordinate gives apparent IC50values of meperidine obtained from concentration–effect experiments for meperidine during which various concentrations of lidocaine (abscissa) were present. Dashed lines show the theoretical change of the apparent meperidine IC50in dependence of the simultaneously present concentrations of lidocaine assuming models of either competition of both drugs for one binding site (equation 2) or of two independent binding sites (no change). Dotted lines give 95% confidence intervals for the data. (C 
	and D 
	) Error bars show SEM if larger than symbol size, and the number of experiments is given above each data point.
Fig. 1. Effects of meperidine and lidocaine on axonal Na+currents. Traces show multiple channel Na+currents recorded in (A  ) control and 100 and 300 μM meperidine, and (B  ) control and 100 and 300 μM lidocaine and after wash. The pulse protocol is given in text. Traces represent averages of 20 recordings. Holding potential was set to −90 mV, and a 50-ms prepulse to −130 mV was applied to remove fast inactivation, followed by a 50-ms test pulse to −40 mV. Bath, Ri-TEA; pipette, CsCli. (C  ) Concentration dependence of Na+channel block by externally applied meperidine (circles) and lidocaine (diamonds) were derived from experiments as shown in A  and B  . Fractional block was obtained by measuring the reduction of peak current and is plotted versus  concentration of meperidine and lidocaine, respectively. The cross marks half-maximal concentration (IC50). (D  ) Simultaneous application of meperidine and lidocaine. Ordinate gives apparent IC50values of meperidine obtained from concentration–effect experiments for meperidine during which various concentrations of lidocaine (abscissa) were present. Dashed lines show the theoretical change of the apparent meperidine IC50in dependence of the simultaneously present concentrations of lidocaine assuming models of either competition of both drugs for one binding site (equation 2) or of two independent binding sites (no change). Dotted lines give 95% confidence intervals for the data. (C  and D  ) Error bars show SEM if larger than symbol size, and the number of experiments is given above each data point.
×
Local anesthetic block is most likely mediated by binding to specific receptors on voltage-gated Na+channels. 21 Meperidine has a similar Na+channel–blocking effect in the same concentration range as local anesthetic agents, and therefore it can be postulated that meperidine acts at the same binding site. To address this question, we performed competition experiments. Concentration–effect curves for lidocaine and for meperidine after lidocaine preincubation were constructed as described in Materials and Methods and in figure 1. IC50values found for meperidine without and with lidocaine incubation are plotted against concentration of lidocaine (fig. 1D). The apparent potency of meperidine is clearly independent of the concentration of lidocaine, suggesting that there is no competition for a common binding site on the Na+channel. These results imply that meperidine acts on the peripheral nerve Na+channel via  a different molecular mechanism than local anesthetic agents do.
There is great diversity in K+channels in the axonal membrane, 22 and the effect of meperidine on some of these channels was investigated in the present study. KDRof the peripheral nerve have been studied in outside-out patches formed at the nodal or paranodal region of the peripheral nerve. A test pulse to 0 mV from a holding potential of −90 mV elicited KDR. Similar to Na+currents, KDRwere reversibly blocked in a concentration-dependent manner (fig. 2), but block was not complete even at high concentrations of meperidine. The IC50was evaluated as 194 ± 24 μM (n = 8), and an fbmaxvalue of 0.83 ± 0.03 was reached. We did not perform further investigation of subtypes of KDR.
Fig. 2. Effects of meperidine on voltage-activated K+currents. Multiple channel KDRcurrents in an outside-out patch responding to a test pulse to 0 mV from a holding potential of −90 mV. The pulse protocol is given above the traces. Traces show averages of 20 recordings of the KDRcurrent in control solution and 100 μM, 1 mM, and 3 mM meperidine and after wash. Bath, Ri-TTX; pipette, KCli.
Fig. 2. Effects of meperidine on voltage-activated K+currents. Multiple channel KDRcurrents in an outside-out patch responding to a test pulse to 0 mV from a holding potential of −90 mV. The pulse protocol is given above the traces. Traces show averages of 20 recordings of the KDRcurrent in control solution and 100 μM, 1 mM, and 3 mM meperidine and after wash. Bath, Ri-TTX; pipette, KCli.
Fig. 2. Effects of meperidine on voltage-activated K+currents. Multiple channel KDRcurrents in an outside-out patch responding to a test pulse to 0 mV from a holding potential of −90 mV. The pulse protocol is given above the traces. Traces show averages of 20 recordings of the KDRcurrent in control solution and 100 μM, 1 mM, and 3 mM meperidine and after wash. Bath, Ri-TTX; pipette, KCli.
×
To investigate KCa, 100 μM CaCl2was added to the pipette solution, and the membrane potential was maintained continuously at +40 mV to activate the channels. After inactivation of the KDR(1–2 min), single KCas were observed. Meperidine also had a blocking effect on these channels at high concentrations as demonstrated in figure 3A. The fast flickery block of this channel produced by meperidine indicates rapid binding (blocked) and unbinding (unblocked) of the drug in the microsecond range. Because the flickering is too fast to be resolved by the system (because of filtering), it manifests as a reduction in amplitude of the channel trace (fig. 3A).
Fig. 3. Effects of meperidine on axonal background K+channels. (A  ) Single channel recording from an outside-out patch containing one Ca2+-activated K+channel. Traces show current in control solution and after application of 100 μM and 1 mM meperidine. Holding potential was +40 mV. Bath, 105 mM Ko; pipette, KCliwithout EGTA but with 100 μM Ca2+. (B  ) Recordings from an outside-out patch containing one flicker K+channel. Single channel current is shown in control solution and in 100 μM and 1 mM meperidine. Holding potential was −90 mV. Bath, 105 mM Ko; pipette, KCli. (A  and B  ) Closed levels of the channels are marked by an arrowhead and the letter c. Point amplitude histograms from 30-s recordings were fitted with two Gaussian to give single channel amplitudes (indicated above the open channel level) and are plotted to the right of each recording.
Fig. 3. Effects of meperidine on axonal background K+channels. (A 
	) Single channel recording from an outside-out patch containing one Ca2+-activated K+channel. Traces show current in control solution and after application of 100 μM and 1 mM meperidine. Holding potential was +40 mV. Bath, 105 mM Ko; pipette, KCliwithout EGTA but with 100 μM Ca2+. (B 
	) Recordings from an outside-out patch containing one flicker K+channel. Single channel current is shown in control solution and in 100 μM and 1 mM meperidine. Holding potential was −90 mV. Bath, 105 mM Ko; pipette, KCli. (A 
	and B 
	) Closed levels of the channels are marked by an arrowhead and the letter c. Point amplitude histograms from 30-s recordings were fitted with two Gaussian to give single channel amplitudes (indicated above the open channel level) and are plotted to the right of each recording.
Fig. 3. Effects of meperidine on axonal background K+channels. (A  ) Single channel recording from an outside-out patch containing one Ca2+-activated K+channel. Traces show current in control solution and after application of 100 μM and 1 mM meperidine. Holding potential was +40 mV. Bath, 105 mM Ko; pipette, KCliwithout EGTA but with 100 μM Ca2+. (B  ) Recordings from an outside-out patch containing one flicker K+channel. Single channel current is shown in control solution and in 100 μM and 1 mM meperidine. Holding potential was −90 mV. Bath, 105 mM Ko; pipette, KCli. (A  and B  ) Closed levels of the channels are marked by an arrowhead and the letter c. Point amplitude histograms from 30-s recordings were fitted with two Gaussian to give single channel amplitudes (indicated above the open channel level) and are plotted to the right of each recording.
×
Figure 3Bshows the effect of meperidine on single voltage-independent (background) K+channel found mainly in thin myelinated nerve fibers. 23 Because of its flickery appearance in control solution, the channel was termed flicker K+channel. This channel shares features with the cloned K+channel rTASK, 24 which belongs to a group of recently discovered two-pore domain background K+channels. A noteworthy feature of the flicker K+channel is its high sensitivity to lipophilic amide local anesthetic agents, such as ropivacaine and bupivacaine, which might play a role in differential nerve block. 12 Block of this channel by meperidine is concentration dependent and reversible and appears as a reduction in single channel amplitude as seen in amplitude histograms. Flickering block by meperidine overlaps the intrinsic flickering of the channel (fig. 3B).
The concentration–effect relations of meperidine for the Na+channel and all K+channels investigated are plotted in figure 4. IC50values as derived from nonlinear least-squares fit were 194 ± 24 μM (n = 8) for KDR, with bmax= 0.83 ± 0.03. The flicker K+and the KCawere blocked completely at high concentrations of meperidine (bmaxfixed to 1), with IC50values of 139 ± 15 μM (n = 6) and 161 ± 18 μM (n = 5), respectively.
Fig. 4. Concentration dependence of Na+(for comparison superimposed from fig. 1), KDR, Kfli, and KCachannel block by externally applied meperidine. Fractional block (fb) is obtained either by measuring reduction of peak current (Na+channels), steady-state current (KDRchannels), or mean current (Kfliand KCachannel) and is plotted versus  concentration (c) of meperidine. Data points represent means; error bars represent SEM if larger than symbol size. Curves were obtained by nonlinear least-squares fits of the data points to function 1; crosses mark IC50values, which are given in the text. The maximal achievable block (bmax) with high concentrations of meperidine was fitted as 0.83 for KDRand set to 1 for all other channels investigated.
Fig. 4. Concentration dependence of Na+(for comparison superimposed from fig. 1), KDR, Kfli, and KCachannel block by externally applied meperidine. Fractional block (fb) is obtained either by measuring reduction of peak current (Na+channels), steady-state current (KDRchannels), or mean current (Kfliand KCachannel) and is plotted versus 
	concentration (c) of meperidine. Data points represent means; error bars represent SEM if larger than symbol size. Curves were obtained by nonlinear least-squares fits of the data points to function 1; crosses mark IC50values, which are given in the text. The maximal achievable block (bmax) with high concentrations of meperidine was fitted as 0.83 for KDRand set to 1 for all other channels investigated.
Fig. 4. Concentration dependence of Na+(for comparison superimposed from fig. 1), KDR, Kfli, and KCachannel block by externally applied meperidine. Fractional block (fb) is obtained either by measuring reduction of peak current (Na+channels), steady-state current (KDRchannels), or mean current (Kfliand KCachannel) and is plotted versus  concentration (c) of meperidine. Data points represent means; error bars represent SEM if larger than symbol size. Curves were obtained by nonlinear least-squares fits of the data points to function 1; crosses mark IC50values, which are given in the text. The maximal achievable block (bmax) with high concentrations of meperidine was fitted as 0.83 for KDRand set to 1 for all other channels investigated.
×
Meperidine block of Na+channels and KDRhas been tested for antagonism by naloxone. In these experiments, partial block of Na+channels and KDRwas induced by 100 and 1,000 μM meperidine, respectively. Addition of naloxone did not influence meperidine block of both channel types (fig. 5).
Fig. 5. Simultaneous application of meperidine and naloxone. (A  ) Multiple channel Na+currents are recorded in control solution, 100 μM meperidine, 100 μM meperidine plus 10 nM naloxone, and 100 μM meperidine plus 1 μM naloxone (traces from bottom to top). (B  ) Traces show multiple channel KDRcurrents recorded in control, 1 mM meperidine, and 1 mM meperidine plus 100 nM naloxone (from top to bottom). (A  and B  ) Pulse protocols are given above the traces; each trace represents an average of 20 recordings. (C  ) Na+and KDRchannel antagonism by naloxone. Voltage-dependent Na+and KDRcurrents have been blocked by 100 μM and 1 mM meperidine, respectively, before different concentrations of naloxone were added (given on abscissa). Bars indicate fractional block of peak Na+(left  ) and steady-state KDRcurrent (right  ) induced by given concentrations of meperidine and naloxone. Error bars show SEM; the number of experiments is given above each bar.
Fig. 5. Simultaneous application of meperidine and naloxone. (A 
	) Multiple channel Na+currents are recorded in control solution, 100 μM meperidine, 100 μM meperidine plus 10 nM naloxone, and 100 μM meperidine plus 1 μM naloxone (traces from bottom to top). (B 
	) Traces show multiple channel KDRcurrents recorded in control, 1 mM meperidine, and 1 mM meperidine plus 100 nM naloxone (from top to bottom). (A 
	and B 
	) Pulse protocols are given above the traces; each trace represents an average of 20 recordings. (C 
	) Na+and KDRchannel antagonism by naloxone. Voltage-dependent Na+and KDRcurrents have been blocked by 100 μM and 1 mM meperidine, respectively, before different concentrations of naloxone were added (given on abscissa). Bars indicate fractional block of peak Na+(left 
	) and steady-state KDRcurrent (right 
	) induced by given concentrations of meperidine and naloxone. Error bars show SEM; the number of experiments is given above each bar.
Fig. 5. Simultaneous application of meperidine and naloxone. (A  ) Multiple channel Na+currents are recorded in control solution, 100 μM meperidine, 100 μM meperidine plus 10 nM naloxone, and 100 μM meperidine plus 1 μM naloxone (traces from bottom to top). (B  ) Traces show multiple channel KDRcurrents recorded in control, 1 mM meperidine, and 1 mM meperidine plus 100 nM naloxone (from top to bottom). (A  and B  ) Pulse protocols are given above the traces; each trace represents an average of 20 recordings. (C  ) Na+and KDRchannel antagonism by naloxone. Voltage-dependent Na+and KDRcurrents have been blocked by 100 μM and 1 mM meperidine, respectively, before different concentrations of naloxone were added (given on abscissa). Bars indicate fractional block of peak Na+(left  ) and steady-state KDRcurrent (right  ) induced by given concentrations of meperidine and naloxone. Error bars show SEM; the number of experiments is given above each bar.
×
Discussion
Among clinically used opioids, meperidine exerts the strongest local anesthetic–like effect 25 and has been used successfully for local anesthesia. 1–7 In spinal anesthesia, meperidine produces a segmental motor and sensory block comparable to lidocaine. 1,26 In in vitro  experiments on rabbit vagal nerves, meperidine inhibited compound action potentials of A and C fibers with IC50values of ≈100 μg/ml (350 μM). 8 Single dorsal root axons required ≈700 μM meperidine to achieve conduction block in ≈60% of the fibers. 9 The IC50value of 164 μM for axonal Na+channel block in this study is in good agreement with the earlier observations of compound action potentials block if one takes into account that, because of the conduction safety factor, ≈80% of the Na+channels have to be blocked before loss of conduction occurs in a peripheral nerve fiber.
In voltage–clamp experiments, potencies of meperidine and other opioids for peripheral nerve impulse blockade have been evaluated. 27 Highly potent opioids, however, including fentanyl and sufentanil, failed to block nerve conduction in several experimental studies, even at high concentrations. 9,28,29 Electrophysiologic effects of opioids on the central and peripheral nervous system have been reviewed by Duggan and North. 30 
There is a diversity of opioid receptors in the central nervous system. 31 In the sensory peripheral nervous system, the existence of opioid binding sites has been proved in cell somata, i.e.  , rat dorsal root ganglion neurons, and in the central terminals of these afferent fibers. 32 Further, the amount of μ-, δ-, and κ-receptor encoding mRNA expressed in dorsal root ganglion cells has been found to be intense. 33 However, there seems to be no electrophysiologic importance of opioid receptors in the soma of dorsal root ganglion neurons. 34 Opioid receptors have been shown in sensory peripheral nerve axons, 33 and axons are known to convey opioid receptors by axonal transport into inflamed tissues. 35 
In frog sciatic nerve, Hunter and Frank 16 demonstrated the contribution of opioid receptors to Na+current block. In their experiments, naloxone partially antagonized a morphine-induced conduction block. In contrast, Hu and Rubly 14 proposed that the blocking effect of morphine on Na+and K+currents in frog sciatic nerve is not mediated by opioid receptors. In their experiments, high concentrations of opioids were needed to achieve nerve block. Intravenous application of opioids, which results only in low concentrations in nervous tissues, does not have an effect on peripheral nerve C fibers. 29 
In our experiments, a Na+channel–blocking effect mediated via  opioid receptors is unlikely for two reasons. First, the potency of meperidine in blocking Na+channels is low. The IC50value of 164 μM as found in this study was 80 times higher than concentrations in plasma needed to achieve postoperative analgesia mediated via  opioid receptors, which is ≈500 ng/ml (2 μM). 36 An effect on peripheral Na+channels in this low concentration range has not been observed for meperidine in our experiments. Second, meperidine block of Na+channels could not be antagonized by naloxone, a drug that displaces opioids from the binding site at the opioid receptor. The lack of antagonizing ability by naloxone is interpreted as an nonopioid receptor–mediated effect.
Opioid action on ion channels is mediated via  intracellular second messenger systems. In neurons of the locus coeruleus and plexus submucosus, it has been shown that μ- and δ-opioid receptors can activate inward rectifier K+channels by intracellular second messenger systems, thus hyperpolarizing the cell. 37 In substantia gelatinosa neurons of guinea pigs, μ- and κ-receptors produce an increase in K+conductance. 38 Calcium channels are regulated by Goproteins coupled to opioid receptors, which leads to a reduction of excitability and transmitter release. 39 
In our studies, however, only direct interactions of opioids with ion channels without emphasis on intracellular second messenger mechanisms have been investigated. An activating effect on K+channels has not been observed in a broad concentration range in our experiments.
Meperidine has a blocking effect on Na+channels in a similar concentration range as lidocaine, which explains the local anesthetic potency of this opioid. Competition experiments between the two agents, however, demonstrated different mechanisms in blocking Na+channels.
Meperidine shows no selectivity in blocking different peripheral nerve ion channels (all channels are blocked in a similar concentration range). Similarly, high concentrations of morphine were able to block Na+and K+currents equipotently in the squid giant axon 40 and myelinated nerve. 14 The maximal achievable block of KDRof 83% is probably a result of the ion channel diversity contributing to this current, 17,41 and certain channel subtypes may not be sensitive to meperidine. We did not further discriminate between distinct types of KDRin this study, however.
In contrast, local anesthetic agents inhibit different channel types at different concentrations. They generally have higher potencies in blocking voltage-dependent Na+channels than KDRin peripheral nerves. 18,42 This selectivity for Na+channel block also has been demonstrated by the axonal patch–clamp method for other substances that have a local anesthetic effect, such as ketamine 43 and droperidol (Bräu ME, unpublished data, 1997). For droperidol, competition with lidocaine has been shown in these experiments, revealing a common blocking mechanism for these two agents. Furthermore, lipophilic amide-linked local anesthetic agents, such as bupivacaine and ropivacaine, have much higher potencies in blocking flicker K+channels 12 than voltage-sensitive Na+channels.
The exact physiologic role of axonal flicker K+channels remains unresolved; however, it is speculated that these channels set the resting membrane potential in thin myelinated nerve fibers. 23 Block of flicker K+channels may enhance block of Na+channels in small axons by depolarizing the resting membrane potential and thus driving more Na+channels into their inactivated state. 12 
The successful use of meperidine for local anesthesia is probably attributable to its low affinity to opioid receptors. Because of this, commercial preparations of meperidine are highly concentrated—50 mg/ml (176 mM)—compared with 0.05 mg/ml (0.15 mM) for fentanyl. Therefore, local application of the preparation of meperidine yields sufficiently high concentrations of drug at the nerve for Na+channel blockade, whereas potent opioids such as fentanyl do not. Concentrations in plasma achieved during local anesthesia with meperidine, however, are too low to have an analgesic effect. 44 
The opioid meperidine has a local anesthetic–like activity because of its Na+channel–blocking potency. Its affinity to peripheral nerve Na+channels is comparably low, as for the local anesthetic agent lidocaine. Its action, however, is mediated by a different binding site on the Na+channel but not via  opioid receptors. Current through different K+channels of the peripheral nerve is also inhibited by meperidine; inhibiting concentrations are all in a similar range, suggesting a nonselective blocking effect. Nonspecific binding to membrane proteins or nonspecific membrane effects therefore may be the mechanism of action of meperidine on nerve excitability.
The authors thank B. V. Safronov for reading and critically discussing the manuscript.
References
Mircea N, Constantinescu C, Jianu E, Busu G, Ene C, Daschievici S, Nedelcu A, Leoveanu A: L’anesthésie sousarachnoidienne par la pethidine. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1982; 1:167–71Mircea, N Constantinescu, C Jianu, E Busu, G Ene, C Daschievici, S Nedelcu, A Leoveanu, A
Acalovschi I, Ene V, Lörinczi E, Nicolaus F: Saddle block with pethidine for perineal operations. Br J Anaesth 1986; 58:1012–6Acalovschi, I Ene, V Lörinczi, E Nicolaus, F
Camann WR, Bader AM: Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery with meperidine as the sole agent. Int J Obstet Anaesth 1992; 1:156–8Camann, WR Bader, AM
Patel D, Janardhan Y, Merai B, Robalino J, Shevde K: Comparison of intrathecal meperidine and lidocaine in endoscopic urological procedures. Can J Anaesth 1990; 37:567–70Patel, D Janardhan, Y Merai, B Robalino, J Shevde, K
Lewis RP, Spiers SPW, McLaren IM, Hunt PC, Smith HS: Pethidine as spinal anaesthetic agent: A comparison with plain bupivacaine in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate. Eur J Anaesth 1992; 9:105–9Lewis, RP Spiers, SPW McLaren, IM Hunt, PC Smith, HS
Armstrong PJ, Morton CPJ, Nimmo AF: Pethidine has a local anaesthetic action on peripheral nerves in vivo: Addition to prilocaine 0.25% for intravenous regional anaesthesia in volunteers. Anaesthesia 1993; 48:382–6Armstrong, PJ Morton, CPJ Nimmo, AF
Acalovschi I, Cristea T: Intravenous regional anesthesia with meperidine. Anesth Analg 1995; 81:539–43Acalovschi, I Cristea, T
Power I, Brown DT, Wildsmith JAW: The effect of fentanyl, meperidine and diamorphine on nerve conduction in vitro. Reg Anesth 1991; 16:204–8Power, I Brown, DT Wildsmith, JAW
Jaffe RA, Rowe MA: A comparison of the local anesthetic effects of meperidine, fentanyl, and sufentanil on dorsal root axons. Anesth Analg 1996; 83:776–81Jaffe, RA Rowe, MA
Butterworth JF, Strichartz GR: Molecular mechanisms of local anesthesia: A review. A NESTHESIOLOGY 1990; 72:711–34Butterworth, JF Strichartz, GR
Drachman D, Strichartz GR: Potassium channel blockers potentiate impulse inhibition by local anesthetics. A NESTHESIOLOGY 1991; 75:1051–61Drachman, D Strichartz, GR
Bräu ME, Nau C, Hempelmann G, Vogel W: Local anesthetics potently block a potential insensitive potassium channel in myelinated nerve. J Gen Physiol 1995; 105:485–505Bräu, ME Nau, C Hempelmann, G Vogel, W
Frank GB: Two mechanisms for the meperidine block of action potential production in frog’s skeletal muscle: Non-specific and opiate drug receptor mediated blockade. J Physiol (Lond) 1975; 252:585–601Frank, GB
Hu S, Rubly N: Effects of morphine on ionic currents in frog node of Ranvier. Eur J Pharmacol 1983; 95:185–92Hu, S Rubly, N
Gissen AJ, Gugino LD, Datta S, Miller J, Covino BG: Effects of fentanyl and sufentanil on peripheral mammalian nerves. Anesth Analg 1987; 66:1272–6Gissen, AJ Gugino, LD Datta, S Miller, J Covino, BG
Hunter EG, Frank GB: An opiate receptor on frog sciatic nerve axons. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1979; 57:1171–4Hunter, EG Frank, GB
Jonas P, Bräu ME, Hermsteiner M, Vogel W: Single-channel recordings in myelinated nerve fibers reveals one type of Na channel but different K channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989; 86:7238–42Jonas, P Bräu, ME Hermsteiner, M Vogel, W
Bräu ME, Vogel W, Hempelmann G: Fundamental properties of local anesthetics: Half-maximal blocking concentrations for tonic block of Na+and K+channels in peripheral nerve. Anesth Analg 1998; 87:885–9Bräu, ME Vogel, W Hempelmann, G
Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E, Sakmann B, Sigworth FJ: Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflügers Arch 1981; 391:85–100Hamill, OP Marty, A Neher, E Sakmann, B Sigworth, FJ
Wood SC, Tonner PH, de Armendi AJ, Bugge B, Miller KW: Channel inhibition by alkanols occurs at a binding site on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Mol Pharmacol 1995; 47:121–30Wood, SC Tonner, PH de Armendi, AJ Bugge, B Miller, KW
Ragsdale DS, McPhee JC, Scheuer T, Catterall WA: Molecular determinants of state-dependent block of Na+channels by local anesthetics. Science 1994; 265:1724–8Ragsdale, DS McPhee, JC Scheuer, T Catterall, WA
Vogel W, Schwarz JR: Voltage clamp studies in axons: Macroscopic and single-channel currents, The Axon. Edited by Waxman SG, Kocsis JD, Stys PK. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995, pp 257–-80
Koh DS, Jonas P, Bräu ME, Vogel W: A TEA-insensitive flickering potassium channel active around the resting potential in myelinated nerve. J Membr Biol 1992; 130:149–62Koh, DS Jonas, P Bräu, ME Vogel, W
Leonoudakis D, Gray AT, Winegar BD, Kindler CH, Harada M, Taylor DM, Chavez RA, Forsayeth JR, Yost CS: An open rectifier potassium channel with two pore domains in tandem cloned from rat cerebellum. J Neurosci 1998; 18:868–77Leonoudakis, D Gray, AT Winegar, BD Kindler, CH Harada, M Taylor, DM Chavez, RA Forsayeth, JR Yost, CS
Hassan HG, Pilcher CW, Akermann B, Renck H: Antinociceptive effects of localized administration of opioids compared with lidocaine. Reg Anesth 1989; 14:138–44Hassan, HG Pilcher, CW Akermann, B Renck, H
Yaksh TL: Spinal opiate analgesia: Characteristics and principles of action. Pain 1981; 11:293–349Yaksh, TL
Staiman A, Seeman P: The impulse-blocking concentrations of anesthetics, alcohols, anticonvulsants, barbiturates, and narcotics on phrenic and sciatic nerves. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1974; 52:535–50Staiman, A Seeman, P
Yuge O, Matsumoto M, Kitahata LM, Collins JG, Senami M: Direct opioid application to peripheral nerves does not alter compound action potentials. Anesth Analg 1985; 64:667–71Yuge, O Matsumoto, M Kitahata, LM Collins, JG Senami, M
Senami M, Aoki M, Kitahata LM, Collins JG, Kumeta Y, Murata K: Lack of opiate effects on cat C polymodal nociceptive fibers. Pain 1986; 27:81–90Senami, M Aoki, M Kitahata, LM Collins, JG Kumeta, Y Murata, K
Duggan AW, North RA: Electrophysiology of opioids. Pharmacol Rev 1983; 35:219–81Duggan, AW North, RA
Minami M, Satoh M: Molecular biology of the opioid receptors: Structures, functions and distributions. Neurosci Res 1995; 23:121–45Minami, M Satoh, M
Fields HL, Emson PC, Leigh BK, Gilbert RFT, Iversen LL: Multiple opiate receptor sites on primary afferent fibres. Nature 1980; 284:351–3Fields, HL Emson, PC Leigh, BK Gilbert, RFT Iversen, LL
Maekawa K, Minami M, Yabuuchi K, Toya T, Katao Y, Hosoi Y, Onogi T, Satoh M: In situ hybridization study of μ- and κ-opioid receptor mRNAs in the rat spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia. Neurosci Lett 1994; 168:97–100Maekawa, K Minami, M Yabuuchi, K Toya, T Katao, Y Hosoi, Y Onogi, T Satoh, M
Williams JT, Zieglgänsberger W: Mature spinal ganglion cells are not sensitive to opiate receptor mediated actions. Neurosci Lett 1981; 21:211–6Williams, JT Zieglgänsberger, W
Hassan AH, Ableitner A, Stein C, Herz A: Inflammation of the rat paw enhances axonal transport of opioid receptors in the sciatic nerve and increases their density in the inflamed tissue. Neuroscience 1993; 55:185–95Hassan, AH Ableitner, A Stein, C Herz, A
Tamsen A, Hartvig P, Fagerlund C, Dahlstrom B: Patient-controlled analgesic therapy: II. Individual analgesic demand and analgesic plasma concentrations of pethidine in postoperative pain. Clin Pharmacokinet 1982; 7:164–75Tamsen, A Hartvig, P Fagerlund, C Dahlstrom, B
North RA, Williams JT, Surprenant A, Christie MJ:μ and δ receptors belong to a family of receptors that are coupled to potassium channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1987; 84:5487–91North, RA Williams, JT Surprenant, A Christie, MJ
Grudt TJ, Williams JT: Opioid receptors and the regulation of ion conductances. Rev Neurosci 1995; 6:279–86Grudt, TJ Williams, JT
Hescheler J, Rosenthal W, Trautwein W, Schultz G: The GTP-binding protein, GO, regulates neuronal calcium channels. Nature 1987; 325:445–7Hescheler, J Rosenthal, W Trautwein, W Schultz, G
Frazier DT, Murayama K, Abbott NJ, Narahashi T: Effects of morphine on internally perfused squid giant axons. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1972; 139:434–8Frazier, DT Murayama, K Abbott, NJ Narahashi, T
Dubois JM: Evidence for the existence of three types of potassium channels in the frog Ranvier node membrane. J Physiol (Lond) 1981; 318:297–316Dubois, JM
Århem P, Frankenhäuser B: Local anesthetics: Effects on permeability properties of nodal membrane in myelinated nerve fibres from Xenopus:  Potential clamp experiments. Acta Physiol Scand 1974; 91:11–21Århem, P Frankenhäuser, B
Bräu ME, Sander F, Vogel W, Hempelmann G: Blocking mechanisms of ketamine and its enantiomers in enzymatically demyelinated peripheral nerve as revealed with single-channel experiments. A NESTHESIOLOGY 1997; 86:394–404Bräu, ME Sander, F Vogel, W Hempelmann, G
Nordberg G, Hansdottir V, Bondesson U, Boreus LO, Mellstrand T, Hedner T: CSF and plasma pharmacokinetics of pethidine and norpethidine in man after epidural and intrathecal administration of pethidine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1988; 34:625–31Nordberg, G Hansdottir, V Bondesson, U Boreus, LO Mellstrand, T Hedner, T
Fig. 1. Effects of meperidine and lidocaine on axonal Na+currents. Traces show multiple channel Na+currents recorded in (A  ) control and 100 and 300 μM meperidine, and (B  ) control and 100 and 300 μM lidocaine and after wash. The pulse protocol is given in text. Traces represent averages of 20 recordings. Holding potential was set to −90 mV, and a 50-ms prepulse to −130 mV was applied to remove fast inactivation, followed by a 50-ms test pulse to −40 mV. Bath, Ri-TEA; pipette, CsCli. (C  ) Concentration dependence of Na+channel block by externally applied meperidine (circles) and lidocaine (diamonds) were derived from experiments as shown in A  and B  . Fractional block was obtained by measuring the reduction of peak current and is plotted versus  concentration of meperidine and lidocaine, respectively. The cross marks half-maximal concentration (IC50). (D  ) Simultaneous application of meperidine and lidocaine. Ordinate gives apparent IC50values of meperidine obtained from concentration–effect experiments for meperidine during which various concentrations of lidocaine (abscissa) were present. Dashed lines show the theoretical change of the apparent meperidine IC50in dependence of the simultaneously present concentrations of lidocaine assuming models of either competition of both drugs for one binding site (equation 2) or of two independent binding sites (no change). Dotted lines give 95% confidence intervals for the data. (C  and D  ) Error bars show SEM if larger than symbol size, and the number of experiments is given above each data point.
Fig. 1. Effects of meperidine and lidocaine on axonal Na+currents. Traces show multiple channel Na+currents recorded in (A 
	) control and 100 and 300 μM meperidine, and (B 
	) control and 100 and 300 μM lidocaine and after wash. The pulse protocol is given in text. Traces represent averages of 20 recordings. Holding potential was set to −90 mV, and a 50-ms prepulse to −130 mV was applied to remove fast inactivation, followed by a 50-ms test pulse to −40 mV. Bath, Ri-TEA; pipette, CsCli. (C 
	) Concentration dependence of Na+channel block by externally applied meperidine (circles) and lidocaine (diamonds) were derived from experiments as shown in A 
	and B 
	. Fractional block was obtained by measuring the reduction of peak current and is plotted versus 
	concentration of meperidine and lidocaine, respectively. The cross marks half-maximal concentration (IC50). (D 
	) Simultaneous application of meperidine and lidocaine. Ordinate gives apparent IC50values of meperidine obtained from concentration–effect experiments for meperidine during which various concentrations of lidocaine (abscissa) were present. Dashed lines show the theoretical change of the apparent meperidine IC50in dependence of the simultaneously present concentrations of lidocaine assuming models of either competition of both drugs for one binding site (equation 2) or of two independent binding sites (no change). Dotted lines give 95% confidence intervals for the data. (C 
	and D 
	) Error bars show SEM if larger than symbol size, and the number of experiments is given above each data point.
Fig. 1. Effects of meperidine and lidocaine on axonal Na+currents. Traces show multiple channel Na+currents recorded in (A  ) control and 100 and 300 μM meperidine, and (B  ) control and 100 and 300 μM lidocaine and after wash. The pulse protocol is given in text. Traces represent averages of 20 recordings. Holding potential was set to −90 mV, and a 50-ms prepulse to −130 mV was applied to remove fast inactivation, followed by a 50-ms test pulse to −40 mV. Bath, Ri-TEA; pipette, CsCli. (C  ) Concentration dependence of Na+channel block by externally applied meperidine (circles) and lidocaine (diamonds) were derived from experiments as shown in A  and B  . Fractional block was obtained by measuring the reduction of peak current and is plotted versus  concentration of meperidine and lidocaine, respectively. The cross marks half-maximal concentration (IC50). (D  ) Simultaneous application of meperidine and lidocaine. Ordinate gives apparent IC50values of meperidine obtained from concentration–effect experiments for meperidine during which various concentrations of lidocaine (abscissa) were present. Dashed lines show the theoretical change of the apparent meperidine IC50in dependence of the simultaneously present concentrations of lidocaine assuming models of either competition of both drugs for one binding site (equation 2) or of two independent binding sites (no change). Dotted lines give 95% confidence intervals for the data. (C  and D  ) Error bars show SEM if larger than symbol size, and the number of experiments is given above each data point.
×
Fig. 2. Effects of meperidine on voltage-activated K+currents. Multiple channel KDRcurrents in an outside-out patch responding to a test pulse to 0 mV from a holding potential of −90 mV. The pulse protocol is given above the traces. Traces show averages of 20 recordings of the KDRcurrent in control solution and 100 μM, 1 mM, and 3 mM meperidine and after wash. Bath, Ri-TTX; pipette, KCli.
Fig. 2. Effects of meperidine on voltage-activated K+currents. Multiple channel KDRcurrents in an outside-out patch responding to a test pulse to 0 mV from a holding potential of −90 mV. The pulse protocol is given above the traces. Traces show averages of 20 recordings of the KDRcurrent in control solution and 100 μM, 1 mM, and 3 mM meperidine and after wash. Bath, Ri-TTX; pipette, KCli.
Fig. 2. Effects of meperidine on voltage-activated K+currents. Multiple channel KDRcurrents in an outside-out patch responding to a test pulse to 0 mV from a holding potential of −90 mV. The pulse protocol is given above the traces. Traces show averages of 20 recordings of the KDRcurrent in control solution and 100 μM, 1 mM, and 3 mM meperidine and after wash. Bath, Ri-TTX; pipette, KCli.
×
Fig. 3. Effects of meperidine on axonal background K+channels. (A  ) Single channel recording from an outside-out patch containing one Ca2+-activated K+channel. Traces show current in control solution and after application of 100 μM and 1 mM meperidine. Holding potential was +40 mV. Bath, 105 mM Ko; pipette, KCliwithout EGTA but with 100 μM Ca2+. (B  ) Recordings from an outside-out patch containing one flicker K+channel. Single channel current is shown in control solution and in 100 μM and 1 mM meperidine. Holding potential was −90 mV. Bath, 105 mM Ko; pipette, KCli. (A  and B  ) Closed levels of the channels are marked by an arrowhead and the letter c. Point amplitude histograms from 30-s recordings were fitted with two Gaussian to give single channel amplitudes (indicated above the open channel level) and are plotted to the right of each recording.
Fig. 3. Effects of meperidine on axonal background K+channels. (A 
	) Single channel recording from an outside-out patch containing one Ca2+-activated K+channel. Traces show current in control solution and after application of 100 μM and 1 mM meperidine. Holding potential was +40 mV. Bath, 105 mM Ko; pipette, KCliwithout EGTA but with 100 μM Ca2+. (B 
	) Recordings from an outside-out patch containing one flicker K+channel. Single channel current is shown in control solution and in 100 μM and 1 mM meperidine. Holding potential was −90 mV. Bath, 105 mM Ko; pipette, KCli. (A 
	and B 
	) Closed levels of the channels are marked by an arrowhead and the letter c. Point amplitude histograms from 30-s recordings were fitted with two Gaussian to give single channel amplitudes (indicated above the open channel level) and are plotted to the right of each recording.
Fig. 3. Effects of meperidine on axonal background K+channels. (A  ) Single channel recording from an outside-out patch containing one Ca2+-activated K+channel. Traces show current in control solution and after application of 100 μM and 1 mM meperidine. Holding potential was +40 mV. Bath, 105 mM Ko; pipette, KCliwithout EGTA but with 100 μM Ca2+. (B  ) Recordings from an outside-out patch containing one flicker K+channel. Single channel current is shown in control solution and in 100 μM and 1 mM meperidine. Holding potential was −90 mV. Bath, 105 mM Ko; pipette, KCli. (A  and B  ) Closed levels of the channels are marked by an arrowhead and the letter c. Point amplitude histograms from 30-s recordings were fitted with two Gaussian to give single channel amplitudes (indicated above the open channel level) and are plotted to the right of each recording.
×
Fig. 4. Concentration dependence of Na+(for comparison superimposed from fig. 1), KDR, Kfli, and KCachannel block by externally applied meperidine. Fractional block (fb) is obtained either by measuring reduction of peak current (Na+channels), steady-state current (KDRchannels), or mean current (Kfliand KCachannel) and is plotted versus  concentration (c) of meperidine. Data points represent means; error bars represent SEM if larger than symbol size. Curves were obtained by nonlinear least-squares fits of the data points to function 1; crosses mark IC50values, which are given in the text. The maximal achievable block (bmax) with high concentrations of meperidine was fitted as 0.83 for KDRand set to 1 for all other channels investigated.
Fig. 4. Concentration dependence of Na+(for comparison superimposed from fig. 1), KDR, Kfli, and KCachannel block by externally applied meperidine. Fractional block (fb) is obtained either by measuring reduction of peak current (Na+channels), steady-state current (KDRchannels), or mean current (Kfliand KCachannel) and is plotted versus 
	concentration (c) of meperidine. Data points represent means; error bars represent SEM if larger than symbol size. Curves were obtained by nonlinear least-squares fits of the data points to function 1; crosses mark IC50values, which are given in the text. The maximal achievable block (bmax) with high concentrations of meperidine was fitted as 0.83 for KDRand set to 1 for all other channels investigated.
Fig. 4. Concentration dependence of Na+(for comparison superimposed from fig. 1), KDR, Kfli, and KCachannel block by externally applied meperidine. Fractional block (fb) is obtained either by measuring reduction of peak current (Na+channels), steady-state current (KDRchannels), or mean current (Kfliand KCachannel) and is plotted versus  concentration (c) of meperidine. Data points represent means; error bars represent SEM if larger than symbol size. Curves were obtained by nonlinear least-squares fits of the data points to function 1; crosses mark IC50values, which are given in the text. The maximal achievable block (bmax) with high concentrations of meperidine was fitted as 0.83 for KDRand set to 1 for all other channels investigated.
×
Fig. 5. Simultaneous application of meperidine and naloxone. (A  ) Multiple channel Na+currents are recorded in control solution, 100 μM meperidine, 100 μM meperidine plus 10 nM naloxone, and 100 μM meperidine plus 1 μM naloxone (traces from bottom to top). (B  ) Traces show multiple channel KDRcurrents recorded in control, 1 mM meperidine, and 1 mM meperidine plus 100 nM naloxone (from top to bottom). (A  and B  ) Pulse protocols are given above the traces; each trace represents an average of 20 recordings. (C  ) Na+and KDRchannel antagonism by naloxone. Voltage-dependent Na+and KDRcurrents have been blocked by 100 μM and 1 mM meperidine, respectively, before different concentrations of naloxone were added (given on abscissa). Bars indicate fractional block of peak Na+(left  ) and steady-state KDRcurrent (right  ) induced by given concentrations of meperidine and naloxone. Error bars show SEM; the number of experiments is given above each bar.
Fig. 5. Simultaneous application of meperidine and naloxone. (A 
	) Multiple channel Na+currents are recorded in control solution, 100 μM meperidine, 100 μM meperidine plus 10 nM naloxone, and 100 μM meperidine plus 1 μM naloxone (traces from bottom to top). (B 
	) Traces show multiple channel KDRcurrents recorded in control, 1 mM meperidine, and 1 mM meperidine plus 100 nM naloxone (from top to bottom). (A 
	and B 
	) Pulse protocols are given above the traces; each trace represents an average of 20 recordings. (C 
	) Na+and KDRchannel antagonism by naloxone. Voltage-dependent Na+and KDRcurrents have been blocked by 100 μM and 1 mM meperidine, respectively, before different concentrations of naloxone were added (given on abscissa). Bars indicate fractional block of peak Na+(left 
	) and steady-state KDRcurrent (right 
	) induced by given concentrations of meperidine and naloxone. Error bars show SEM; the number of experiments is given above each bar.
Fig. 5. Simultaneous application of meperidine and naloxone. (A  ) Multiple channel Na+currents are recorded in control solution, 100 μM meperidine, 100 μM meperidine plus 10 nM naloxone, and 100 μM meperidine plus 1 μM naloxone (traces from bottom to top). (B  ) Traces show multiple channel KDRcurrents recorded in control, 1 mM meperidine, and 1 mM meperidine plus 100 nM naloxone (from top to bottom). (A  and B  ) Pulse protocols are given above the traces; each trace represents an average of 20 recordings. (C  ) Na+and KDRchannel antagonism by naloxone. Voltage-dependent Na+and KDRcurrents have been blocked by 100 μM and 1 mM meperidine, respectively, before different concentrations of naloxone were added (given on abscissa). Bars indicate fractional block of peak Na+(left  ) and steady-state KDRcurrent (right  ) induced by given concentrations of meperidine and naloxone. Error bars show SEM; the number of experiments is given above each bar.
×