Free
Pain Medicine  |   August 2000
Effect of Pretreatment with Intrathecal Excitatory Amino Acid Receptor Antagonists on the Development of Pain Behavior Caused by Plantar Incision
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Esther M. Pogatzki, M.D.
    *
  • Peter K. Zahn, M.D.
    *
  • Timothy J. Brennan, M.D., Ph.D.
  • *Research Fellow, Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, and Klinik und Poliklinik fuer Anesthesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Westfaelische, Muenster, Germany. †Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
  • Srinivasa Raja, M.D., served as acting Editor-in-Chief for this article.
Article Information
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine   |   August 2000
Effect of Pretreatment with Intrathecal Excitatory Amino Acid Receptor Antagonists on the Development of Pain Behavior Caused by Plantar Incision
Anesthesiology 8 2000, Vol.93, 489-496. doi:
Anesthesiology 8 2000, Vol.93, 489-496. doi:
LONG-term changes in synaptic strength may be induced by conditioning stimuli in dorsal horn neurons of the spinal cord, 1 suggesting that plasticity in pain control systems occurs. It has been suggested that the injury-induced discharge by trauma or surgery produces enhanced synaptic efficacy and prolonged excitability in the spinal cord similar to learning and memory in the brain. 2 Presumably, injury-induced nociceptor drive and intense dorsal horn neuron activation causes a cascade of events in the dorsal horn that increases second messenger systems, activates intracellular enzymes, and phosphorylates proteins, resulting in persistent pain. 3,4 
A strong argument has been made that excitatory amino acids (EAAs) such as glutamate and aspartate are involved in synaptic plasticity in the dorsal horn.In particular, the N  -methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor has been suggested to be critical for the development of central sensitization and plasticity. 1,3 Presumably, release of EAA from the central terminals of nociceptors during injury causes sustained depolarization of dorsal horn neurons, removes the voltage-dependent magnesium block from the NMDA receptor complex, and allows calcium influx. Activation of calmodulin-dependent protein kinases, nitric oxide production, and protein phosphorylation can occur, and these processes can in turn increase synaptic strength. 5,6 This series of events in the dorsal horn during injury has been the basis for pretreatment strategies using MK-801, a noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist, to inhibit the development of plasticity that causes persistent pain behaviors in animal models. 7–9 
Less is known about the role of other EAA receptors, metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) and non-NMDA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-proprionic acid [AMPA]/kainate) receptors, in the development of plasticity, central sensitization, and persistent pain after tissue injury. Either group could be important. Activation of G protein–coupled mGluR affects phosphorylation of proteins, causing calcium release from internal stores, which could enhance the excitability of neurons. 10,11 Some non-NMDA receptors are also calcium permeable, 12 have been implicated in long-term potentiation in higher centers, 13 and may be important for increased responses of dorsal horn neurons induced by persistent noxious stimuli. 4 
Thus, it is possible that an early antinociceptive treatment preventing intense excitation of dorsal horn neurons by EAAs may be important for reducing persistent pathologic pain. We previously examined the effect of EAA receptor antagonists on pain behaviors after incision. 14–16 We hypothesized that activation of EAA receptors during incision may be important for the development of long-lasting pain behaviors and may be different than results from treatments after incision. The effect of preincision intrathecal administration of EAA receptor antagonists was studied. One antagonist from the NMDA, mGlu, and non-NMDA receptor group was administered 15 min before incision and continued for 1 h after incision. Early effects of the treatment were measured; most importantly, later effects, through 7 days after incision, were examined to determine if a long-term reduction in pain behaviors occurred.
After analyzing the data for these four groups receiving a preincision treatment, an increased withdrawal threshold on postoperative day 1 and an increase in the response frequency on postoperative day 2 were observed in the group pretreated with NBQX. To determine if the reduction in pain behavior by intrathecal NBQX administration was an effect of pretreatment before incision versus  an effect of the drug administered after incision, a vehicle and a group receiving NBQX after incision were studied.
Methods
General
These experiments were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of The University of Iowa. The animals were treated in accordance with the Ethical Guidelines for Investigations of Experimental Pain in Conscious Animals as issued by the International Association for the Study of Pain. Experiments were performed on 48 adult (weight, 250–350 g) male Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan, Indianapolis, IN) housed in pairs before surgery; food and water were available ad libitum  . Postoperatively, the animals were housed individually with organic cellulose bedding (Shepherd Specialty Papers, Inc., Kalamazoo, MI). The incisions were checked daily; at the end of the protocol, all rats were euthanized with an overdose of a mixture of pentobarbital and phenytoin.
Intrathecal Catheter Placement
For subarachnoid drug administration, a lumbar intrathecal catheter was placed using a modified technique 17 to one described previously. 18 After halothane anesthesia was administered (1–2%), the lumbar skin was cleansed and incised. The intervertebral space between L5 and L6 was punctured with a hypodermic needle, and a 32-gauge polyurethane catheter (10-cm length; Micor, Allison Park, PA) was advanced through the needle cranially so that 3.5 cm remained beneath the skin. The distal end was secured, inserted into PE-10 tubing, and tunnelled to the cervical region. The catheter (8-μl dead space) was flushed and sealed. The intrathecal catheter was tested 1 day after surgery using 20 μl of 2% lidocaine 15 and verified at the end of the experiment by injecting 30 μl methylene blue, euthanizing the rat and dissecting the lumbar spinal cord.
Plantar Incision
Rats were anesthetized with 1.5–2% halothane delivered via  a nose cone and administered an intramuscular injection of penicillin, 30,000 IU, in the triceps muscle. As described previously, 19 the plantar aspect of the right hind paw was prepared, and a 1-cm longitudinal incision was made through skin, fascia, and muscle of the plantar aspect of the foot. The skin was apposed with two 5-0 nylon sutures, and the wound site was covered with antibiotic ointment. Sutures were removed at the end of postoperative day 2.
Responses to Mechanical Stimuli
On the day of the experiment, the rats were placed individually on the mesh floor. After adaptation to the testing conditions, baseline pain behaviors before foot incision were measured as previously described. 15 
A 5-mm clear plastic disk attached to a von Frey filament (bending force 400 mN) was applied directly on the intended incision site. 15 A positive response to the blunt mechanical stimulus was defined as a withdrawal response (flinch) or lifting the foot off of the mesh floor without bending the filament. From three repeated tests, the response frequency was calculated (0–100%). Withdrawal responses to punctate mechanical stimulation were determined using calibrated nylon von Frey monofilaments (Stoelting, Wood Dale IL) applied until bending to an area adjacent to the intended wound. 19 Each von Frey filament (15, 30, 42, 65, 73, 98, 149, and 265 mN) was applied once starting with 15 mN and continuing until a withdrawal response occurred or 265 mN was reached. The lowest force from the three tests producing a response was considered the withdrawal threshold. For this study, 522 mN was recorded as the withdrawal threshold if there was no withdrawal response to the next lowest filament (265 mN).
Motor Function
MK-801 and NBQX produce motor dysfunction after intrathecal injection. 14,15 The placing reflex was tested immediately after pain behaviors because this test has been shown to detect hind limb paresis after intrathecal non-NMDA and NMDA receptor antagonist administration. Motor impairment of both hind limbs was calculated as a cumulative score (2 = normal; 1 = delay of 1–2 s; 0 = > 2 s) from three measurements each test period with approximately 2–3 min between tests.
Experimental Protocols
The investigator was blinded to the drug injected intrathecally. Each rat was anesthetized, and vehicle [20 nmol ofNBQX, 40 nmol of MK-801, or 200 nmol of (+)-MCPG] was administered intrathecally 15 min before foot incision. The initial dose of drug was determined from studies of acute administration that prevented pain behaviors caused by intrathecal injection of the corresponding agonist and from doses that eliminated pain behavior in this model. 14–16,20 An intrathecal infusion of drug [20 nmol/h NBQX, 20 nmol/h MK-801, or 100 nmol/h (+)-MCPG] or vehicle was started immediately after the bolus injection and continued for 75 min (fig. 1). The dose used to maintain non-NMDA and NMDA receptor blockade was determined by examining side effects. In preliminary studies, hind limb paresis was sustained by the NBQX and MK-801 infusions. Greater doses of (+)-MCPG caused sedation. For (+)-MCPG, the total dose was three times the dose needed to block agonist-induced pain behaviors for 60 min. 20 Glutamate release in the extracellular fluid of the dorsal horn of the spinal cord has been measured after the same incision. An increase has been observed for approximately 45 min after incision. 21 Based on these data, we continued the infusion for 1 h after incision. Responses to the blunt mechanical stimulus, von Frey filaments, and pin prick were measured 1, 2, 4, and 6 h after incision and daily for the next 6 days (fig. 1B). The placing reflex was performed 1, 2, 4, and 6 h after incision and on postoperative day 1. Sixteen rats were administered either vehicle or NBQX intrathecally immediately after incision. Responses were measured at the same time after incision as in the pretreatment groups.
Fig. 1. Experimental protocols. For preincision treatment (top  ), rats were anesthetized with halothane; the drug or vehicle was administered as a bolus injection (solid triangle) followed by an infusion (solid line). The incision (solid rectangle) was performed 15 min after the bolus intrathecal injection. For postincision treatment (bottom  ), the bolus injection (solid triangle) and the infusion (solid line) were started after the incision (solid rectangle). Rats were tested 1 h after incision and subsequently as shown.
Fig. 1. Experimental protocols. For preincision treatment (top 
	), rats were anesthetized with halothane; the drug or vehicle was administered as a bolus injection (solid triangle) followed by an infusion (solid line). The incision (solid rectangle) was performed 15 min after the bolus intrathecal injection. For postincision treatment (bottom 
	), the bolus injection (solid triangle) and the infusion (solid line) were started after the incision (solid rectangle). Rats were tested 1 h after incision and subsequently as shown.
Fig. 1. Experimental protocols. For preincision treatment (top  ), rats were anesthetized with halothane; the drug or vehicle was administered as a bolus injection (solid triangle) followed by an infusion (solid line). The incision (solid rectangle) was performed 15 min after the bolus intrathecal injection. For postincision treatment (bottom  ), the bolus injection (solid triangle) and the infusion (solid line) were started after the incision (solid rectangle). Rats were tested 1 h after incision and subsequently as shown.
×
Drugs
NBQX (MW = 336) and MK-801 hydrogen maleate (MW = 337) were purchased from Research Biochemicals Inc. (RBI, Natick, MA). NBQX was dissolved in 0.01 N NaOH in saline, and the pH was adjusted with 1 N HCl. MK-801 was dissolved in preservative-free saline. (+)-MCPG (MW = 209) was purchased from Tocris (Ballwin, MO), dissolved in 0.1 N NaOH in saline, and the pH was adjusted with 1 N HCl. pH-adjusted 0.1 N NaOH in saline was used as vehicle. All drugs were prepared on the day of incision, and the pH of all drugs and vehicle was 8.0–9.5. Intrathecal injection volumes for all drugs and vehicle were 20 μl for the bolus, and the infusion was 60 μl/h for 75 min.
Statistics
Data are presented as the median or the mean ± SD where appropriate. Data were compared using nonparametric analyses. 22 The Friedman test for within-group analysis was used followed by multiple comparisons for within-group analysis using nonparametric Dunnett test. Because the response before incision was already near cutoff and could not be greater, a one-tailed test was used. All groups receiving preincision drug [NBQX, (+)-MCPG, MK-801] were compared with vehicle (preincision treatment) using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a two-tailed Dunn test. Differences among groups injected after incision with NBQX (postincision treatment) were compared with NBQX preincision treatment and vehicle groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a two-tailed Dunn test. P  < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Effect of Preincision Treatment with Excitatory Amino Acid Receptor Antagonists
In vehicle-treated rats, the median withdrawal threshold decreased from 522 mN to 41 mN 1 h after incision (figs. 2A–2F). A reduced withdrawal threshold to punctate stimulation was maintained through postoperative day 2 (P  < 0.05) and then increased gradually. NBQX-treated rats had greater withdrawal thresholds 1 and 2 h after incision compared with vehicle (P  < 0.05); all other withdrawal thresholds in NBQX-treated rats were not different except on postoperative day 1 (P  < 0.05). Pretreatment with MK-801 or (+)-MCPG produced no significant effect on the withdrawal threshold compared with vehicle.
Fig. 2. Effect of excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists on the development of withdrawal to punctate mechanical stimulation. Rats were tested before incision, from 1 to 6 h after incision and on postoperative days 1–6. The results are expressed as median (horizontal line) with first and third quartiles (boxes) and 10th and 90th percentiles (vertical lines). (A  ) Withdrawal thresholds in eight rats receiving vehicle administration before incision. (B  –D  ) Withdrawal thresholds in eight rats administered NBQX (B  ), MK-801 (C  ), or (+)-MCPG (D  ) before incision. (E  and F  ) Withdrawal thresholds after incision in eight vehicle-treated rats (E  ) and in eight rats administered NBQX after incision (F  ). *P  < 0.05 versus  preincision by Friedman and Dunnett test. †P  < 0.05 versus  vehicle by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn test.
Fig. 2. Effect of excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists on the development of withdrawal to punctate mechanical stimulation. Rats were tested before incision, from 1 to 6 h after incision and on postoperative days 1–6. The results are expressed as median (horizontal line) with first and third quartiles (boxes) and 10th and 90th percentiles (vertical lines). (A 
	) Withdrawal thresholds in eight rats receiving vehicle administration before incision. (B 
	–D 
	) Withdrawal thresholds in eight rats administered NBQX (B 
	), MK-801 (C 
	), or (+)-MCPG (D 
	) before incision. (E 
	and F 
	) Withdrawal thresholds after incision in eight vehicle-treated rats (E 
	) and in eight rats administered NBQX after incision (F 
	). *P 
	< 0.05 versus 
	preincision by Friedman and Dunnett test. †P 
	< 0.05 versus 
	vehicle by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn test.
Fig. 2. Effect of excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists on the development of withdrawal to punctate mechanical stimulation. Rats were tested before incision, from 1 to 6 h after incision and on postoperative days 1–6. The results are expressed as median (horizontal line) with first and third quartiles (boxes) and 10th and 90th percentiles (vertical lines). (A  ) Withdrawal thresholds in eight rats receiving vehicle administration before incision. (B  –D  ) Withdrawal thresholds in eight rats administered NBQX (B  ), MK-801 (C  ), or (+)-MCPG (D  ) before incision. (E  and F  ) Withdrawal thresholds after incision in eight vehicle-treated rats (E  ) and in eight rats administered NBQX after incision (F  ). *P  < 0.05 versus  preincision by Friedman and Dunnett test. †P  < 0.05 versus  vehicle by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn test.
×
The median response frequency to the blunt mechanical stimulus increased in the vehicle-treated group from 0 ± 0% before to ≥ 67 ± 39% 1–6 h after the incision (figs. 3A–3C). Responses to the nonpunctate stimulus remained persistent for 2 days and then gradually returned to preincision levels. Preincision treatment with NBQX attenuated the response to the nonpunctate stimulus at 1 and 2 h after surgery and on postoperative day 2 (P  < 0.05). The responses to the blunt mechanical stimulus in the MK-801– and (+)-MCPG–treated groups were not different than those of the vehicle group.
Fig. 3. Effect of excitatory amino acid antagonists on the development of response to the nonpunctate mechanical stimulus 1–6 h after incision and on postoperative days 1–6. (A  and B  ) Response frequency (%) to the blunt mechanical stimulus after preincision treatment with vehicle, NBQX, MK-801 and (+)-MCPG. (C  ) Response frequency to a blunt mechanical stimulus in eight vehicle-treated rats and in eight rats administered NBQX after incision. *P  < 0.05 versus  preincision by Friedman and Dunnett test. †P  < 0.05 versus  saline by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn test. The results are expressed as the mean ± SD.
Fig. 3. Effect of excitatory amino acid antagonists on the development of response to the nonpunctate mechanical stimulus 1–6 h after incision and on postoperative days 1–6. (A 
	and B 
	) Response frequency (%) to the blunt mechanical stimulus after preincision treatment with vehicle, NBQX, MK-801 and (+)-MCPG. (C 
	) Response frequency to a blunt mechanical stimulus in eight vehicle-treated rats and in eight rats administered NBQX after incision. *P 
	< 0.05 versus 
	preincision by Friedman and Dunnett test. †P 
	< 0.05 versus 
	saline by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn test. The results are expressed as the mean ± SD.
Fig. 3. Effect of excitatory amino acid antagonists on the development of response to the nonpunctate mechanical stimulus 1–6 h after incision and on postoperative days 1–6. (A  and B  ) Response frequency (%) to the blunt mechanical stimulus after preincision treatment with vehicle, NBQX, MK-801 and (+)-MCPG. (C  ) Response frequency to a blunt mechanical stimulus in eight vehicle-treated rats and in eight rats administered NBQX after incision. *P  < 0.05 versus  preincision by Friedman and Dunnett test. †P  < 0.05 versus  saline by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn test. The results are expressed as the mean ± SD.
×
Effect of Postincision Treatment with the non–N  -methyl-d-aspartate Receptor Antagonist NBQX
Vehicle administration after incision resulted in similar punctate (fig. 2E) and nonpunctate (fig. 3C) mechanical hyperalgesia compared with the preincision vehicle group. Except for the early effect of NBQX at 1 and 2 h (P  < 0.05 vs.  vehicle), no difference in the withdrawal threshold (fig. 2F) or response frequency (fig. 3C) was observed. There were no differences between the preincision and postincision NBQX treatments.
Motor Function
Motor function was not impaired by (+)-MCPG (table 1). NBQX and MK-801 decreased the placing reflex at 1 and 2 h (P  < 0.05 vs.  vehicle). By 4 h, no deficit in the placing reflex could be detected. During MK-801 administration, rats showed a circling or turning-like behavior, indicating a supraspinal side effect; however, no reduction in pain behaviors was observed. No other side effects from intrathecal administration of EAA receptor antagonists were noted.
Table 1. Effect of It EAA Receptor Antagonists on Motor Function
Image not available
Table 1. Effect of It EAA Receptor Antagonists on Motor Function
×
Discussion
The major finding of the present study is that preincision intrathecal treatment with MK-801, an NMDA receptor antagonist, did not prevent the development of enhanced responses to mechanical stimuli after plantar incision in the rat. (+)-MCPG, an mGluR antagonist, also was without effect. A non-NMDA receptor antagonist significantly reduced the enhanced responses to mechanical stimuli during and immediately after drug administration, but the inhibition was not well sustained.
We have shown that blockade of non-NMDA EAA eliminates pain-related behaviors when administered several hours and even days after plantar incision. 15 Blockade of spinal NMDA or mGluR administered after incision had no effect. 14,16 Previous findings 14–16 and the present study indicate that the importance of particular EAA receptors on the development and maintenance of pain behaviors after incision is different than those seen in other models of persistent pain.
Spinal N  -methyl-d-aspartate Receptors
Activation of the NMDA receptor ion channel complex is important for the initiation of central sensitization in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. 4,23–25 In models of inflammation 7,23,26–28 and neuropathic pain, 9,29–34 spinal NMDA receptors can be important for the development of later pain behaviors. There are several reasons why spinal NMDA receptor antagonism did not greatly affect later pain behaviors. Perhaps spinal NMDA receptors are most important after nerve injury, and the plantar incision does not involve nerve injury. In addition, inflammation may be important for the development of some models of persistent pain, and this can be modified by spinal NMDA receptor blockade. Inflammation that is sensitive to spinal NMDA receptor blockade may not be as important for the development of pain behaviors in this model. Finally, the extent of injury in the plantar incision may not be sufficient to activate spinal NMDA receptors. It is possible that NMDA receptors could contribute to the development or maintenance of pain after more extensive surgery in patients.
Comparisons with Clinical Studies
Ketamine acts, in part, as a noncompetitive antagonist at the NMDA receptor complex. Clinical studies have used epidural ketamine to investigate the role of spinal NMDA receptors on the development of postoperative pain. Epidural injection of 30 mg ketamine before incision reduced analgesic requirements up to 24 h after hysterectomy. 35 In another study, no reduction in analgesic consumption or pain scores could be observed 1 and 2 days after upper abdominal surgery in patients administered 60 mg epidural ketamine before surgery. 36 Parenterally administered ketamine has also been administered before surgery for analgesia. 37 In studies like these, it is important to recognize that parenteral ketamine may not have a spinal action, and a supraspinal site for analgesia is likely. Ketamine is also highly lipid soluble, and epidural ketamine may have a systemic/supraspinal effect as well as a spinal action. The results from the current study should not be compared with studies on parenteral ketamine pretreatment for postoperative pain relief.
Spinal non–N  -methyl-d-aspartate Receptor Antagonists
The importance of spinal non-NMDA receptors in the development of persistent pain has not been extensively investigated in animal models. The most notable positive result is from Sluka et al.  28 Spinal non-NMDA receptor blockade before knee joint inflammation prevented joint swelling and reduced pain behaviors. Further studies suggested that spinal non-NMDA receptor antagonism inhibited dorsal root reflexes partly responsible for the generation of the inflammatory process producing joint swelling and pain behaviors. In the present study, small, intermittent, positive results were observed after pretreatment with NBQX, and there is a tendency for reduction in the responses to the blunt probe. It is possible that the variability is too great to observe a positive result from the treatment. No clinical studies have examined the role of non-NMDA receptors in postoperative pain.
Spinal Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Antagonists
Like non-NMDA receptor antagonists, few studies have been undertaken to investigate the role of mGluR in the transmission of nociceptive input to the spinal cord and their contribution to spinal sensitization and persistent pain. One recent study demonstrated that group I mGluRs are involved in the development of neuropathic pain. 38 Selective depletion of lumbar mGluR1 using an antisense treatment demonstrated mGluR1 is important for the development of hyperalgesia caused by inflammation. 39 
Conclusion
N  -methyl-d-aspartate receptors are critical for the induction of persistent pain behaviors caused by peripheral inflammation and nerve injury. The results from the present study indicate that EAA receptor activation is not critical for the induction of incisional pain. These results suggest unique characteristics responsible for pain after particular types of injuries. The enhanced response to mechanical stimulation after an incision may be more dependent on peripheral sensitization than on central plasticity processes induced by EAA receptors during this distinct type of tissue injury.
The authors thank Alberto Subieta for technical assistance and Dr. G. F. Gebhart for reviewing the manuscript.
References
Svendsen F, Tjolsen A, Rygh LJ, Hole K: Expression of long-term potentiation in single wide dynamic range neurons in the rat is sensitive to blockade of glutamate receptors. Neurosci Lett 1999; 259:25–8Svendsen, F Tjolsen, A Rygh, LJ Hole, K
Woolf CJ, Chong MS: Preemptive analgesia-treating postoperative pain by preventing the establishment of central sensitization. Anesth Analg 1993; 77:362–79Woolf, CJ Chong, MS
Woolf CJ, Costigan M: Transcriptional and posttranslational plasticity and the generation of inflammatory pain. Proc Nat Acad Sci 1999; 96:7723–30Woolf, CJ Costigan, M
Svendsen F, Tjolsen A, Hole K: AMPA and NMDA receptor-dependent spinal LTP after nociceptive tetanic stimulation. Neuroreport 1998; 9:1185–90Svendsen, F Tjolsen, A Hole, K
Randic M: Plasticity of excitatory synaptic transmission in the spinal cord dorsal horn. Prog Brain Res 1996; 113:463–506Randic, M
Tolle TR, Berthele A, Schadrack J, Zieglgansberger W: Involvement of glutamatergic neurotransmission and protein kinase C in spinal plasticity and the development of chronic pain. Prog Brain Res 1996; 110:193–206Tolle, TR Berthele, A Schadrack, J Zieglgansberger, W
Yamamoto T, Yaksh TL: Comparison of the antinociceptive effects of pre- and posttreatment with intrathecal morphine and MK801, an NMDA antagonist, on the formalin test in the rat. A nesthesiology 1992; 77:757–63Yamamoto, T Yaksh, TL
Kim YI, Na HS, Yoon YW, Han HC, Ko KH, Hong SK: NMDA receptors are important for both mechanical and thermal allodynia from peripheral nerve injury in rats. Neuroreport 1997; 8:2149–53Kim, YI Na, HS Yoon, YW Han, HC Ko, KH Hong, SK
Seltzer Z, Cohn S, Ginzburg R, Beilin B: Modulation of neuropathic pain behavior in rats by spinal disinhibition and NMDA receptor blockade of injury discharge. Pain 1991; 45:69–75Seltzer, Z Cohn, S Ginzburg, R Beilin, B
Pin J-P, Duvosin R: Review: Neurotransmitter receptors. I. The metabotropic glutamate receptors: Structure and functions. Neuropharmacology 1995; 34:1–26Pin, J-P Duvosin, R
Neugebauer V, Lücke T, Schaible HG: Requirement of metabotropic glutamate receptors for the generation of inflammation-evoked hyperexcitability in rat spinal cord neurons. Eur J Neurosci 1994; 6:1179–86Neugebauer, V Lücke, T Schaible, HG
Gu JG, Albuquerque C, Lee CJ, MacDermott AB: Synaptic strengthening through activation of Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptors. Nature 1996; 381:793–6Gu, JG Albuquerque, C Lee, CJ MacDermott, AB
Ozawa S, Kamiya H, Tsuzuki K: Glutamate receptors in the mammalian central nervous system. Prog Neurobiol 1998; 54:581–618Ozawa, S Kamiya, H Tsuzuki, K
Zahn PK, Brennan TJ: Lack of effect of intrathecal NMDA receptor antagonists in a rat model for postoperative pain. A nesthesiology 1998; 88:143–56Zahn, PK Brennan, TJ
Zahn PK, Umali EF, Brennan TJ: Intrathecal non-NMDA excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists inhibit pain behaviors in a rat model of postoperative pain. Pain 1998; 74:213–23Zahn, PK Umali, EF Brennan, TJ
Zahn PK, Brennan TJ: Intrathecal metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists do not decrease mechanical hyperalgesia in a rat model of postoperative pain. Anesth Analg 1998; 87:1354–9Zahn, PK Brennan, TJ
Pogatzki EM, Zahn PK, Brennan TJ: Lumbar catheterization of the subarachnoid space with a 32 gauge polyurethane catheter in the rat. Eur J Pain 2000; 4:111–3Pogatzki, EM Zahn, PK Brennan, TJ
Storkson RV, Kjorsvik A, Tjolsen A, Hole K: Lumbar catheterization of the spinal subarachnoid space in the rat. J Neurosci Methods 1996; 65:167–72Storkson, RV Kjorsvik, A Tjolsen, A Hole, K
Brennan TJ, Vandermeulen E, Gebhart GF: Characterization of a rat model of incisional pain. Pain 1996; 64:493–501Brennan, TJ Vandermeulen, E Gebhart, GF
Fisher K, Coderre TJ: Comparison of nociceptive effects produced by intrathecal administration of mGluR agonists. Neuroreport 1996; 7:2743–7Fisher, K Coderre, TJ
Zahn PK, Sluka KA, Brennan TJ: Spinal excitatory amino acid (EAA) release after incision in a rat model for postoperative pain (abstract). Soc Neurosci 1998; 24:829Zahn, PK Sluka, KA Brennan, TJ
Siegel S, Castellan NJ: Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1988, pp 168–223
Woolf CJ, Thompson SW: The induction and maintenance of central sensitization is dependent on N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor activation: implications for the treatment of post-injury pain hypersensitivity states. Pain 1991; 44:293–9Woolf, CJ Thompson, SW
Coderre TJ, Melzack R: The contribution of excitatory amino acids to central sensitization and persistent nociception after formalin-induced tissue injury. J Neurosci 1992; 12:3665–70Coderre, TJ Melzack, R
Ma QP, Woolf CJ: Noxious stimuli induce an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-dependent hypersensitivity of the flexion withdrawal reflex to touch: implications for the treatment of mechanical allodynia. Pain 1995; 61:383–90Ma, QP Woolf, CJ
Rice AS, McMahon SB: Pre-emptive intrathecal administration of an NMDA receptor antagonist (AP-5) prevents hyperreflexia in a model of persistent visceral pain. Pain 1994; 57:335–40Rice, AS McMahon, SB
Woolf CJ: A new strategy for the treatment of inflammatory pain. Prevention or elimination of central sensitization. Drugs 1994; 47:1–9Woolf, CJ
Sluka KA, Westlund KN: Centrally administered non-NMDA but not NMDA receptor antagonists block peripheral knee joint inflammation. Pain 1993; 55:217–25Sluka, KA Westlund, KN
Wong CS, Cherng CH, Tung CS: Intrathecal administration of excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists or nitric oxide synthase inhibitor reduced autotomy behavior in rats. Anesth Analg 1998; 87:605–8Wong, CS Cherng, CH Tung, CS
Mao J, Price DD, Mayer DJ, Lu J, Hayes RL: Intrathecal MK-801 and local nerve anesthesia synergistically reduce nociceptive behaviors in rats with experimental peripheral mononeuropathy. Brain Res 1992; 576:254–62Mao, J Price, DD Mayer, DJ Lu, J Hayes, RL
Mao J, Price DD, Hayes RL, Lu J, Mayer DJ: Differential roles of NMDA and non-NMDA receptor activation in induction and maintenance of thermal hyperalgesia in rats with painful peripheral mononeuropathy. Brain Res 1992; 598:271–8Mao, J Price, DD Hayes, RL Lu, J Mayer, DJ
Smith GD, Wiseman J, Harrison SM, Elliott PJ, Birch PJ: Pre treatment with MK-801, a non-competitive NMDA antagonist, prevents development of mechanical hyperalgesia in a rat model of chronic neuropathy, but not in a model of chronic inflammation. Neurosci Lett 1994; 165:79–83Smith, GD Wiseman, J Harrison, SM Elliott, PJ Birch, PJ
Coderre TJ, Katz J, Vaccarino AL, Melzack R: Contribution of central neuroplasticity to pathological pain: Review of clinical and experimental evidence. Pain 1993; 52:259–85Coderre, TJ Katz, J Vaccarino, AL Melzack, R
Vanderah TW, Laughlin T, Lashbrook JM, Nichols ML, Wilcox GL, Ossipov MH, Malan TP, Jr., Porreca F: Single intrathecal injections of dynorphin A or des-Tyr-dynorphins produce long-lasting allodynia in rats: Blockade by MK-801 but not naloxone. Pain 1996; 68:275–81Vanderah, TW Laughlin, T Lashbrook, JM Nichols, ML Wilcox, GL Ossipov, MH Malan, TP Porreca, F
Abdel-Ghaffar ME, Abdulatif MA, al-Ghamdi A, Mowafi H, Anwar A: Epidural ketamine reduces post-operative epidural PCA consumption of fentanyl/bupivacaine. Can J Anaesth 1998; 45:103–9Abdel-Ghaffar, ME Abdulatif, MA al-Ghamdi, A Mowafi, H Anwar, A
Kucuk N, Kizilkaya M, Tokdemir M: Preoperative epidural ketamine does not have a postoperative opioid sparing effect. Anesth Analg 1998; 87:103–6Kucuk, N Kizilkaya, M Tokdemir, M
Schmid RL, Sandler AN, Katz J: Use and efficacy of low-dose ketamine in the management of acute postoperative pain: A review of current techniques and outcomes. Pain 1999; 82:111–25Schmid, RL Sandler, AN Katz, J
Fisher K, Fundytus ME, Cahill CM, Coderre TJ: Intrathecal administration of the mglur compound, (s)-4CPG, attenuates hyperalgesia and allodynia associated with sciatic nerve constriction injury in rats. Pain 1998; 77:59–66Fisher, K Fundytus, ME Cahill, CM Coderre, TJ
Young MR, Blackburn-Munro G, Dickinson T, Johnson MJ, Anderson H, Nakalembe I, Fleetwood-Walker SM: Antisense ablation of type I metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR1 inhibits spinal nociceptive transmission. J Neurosci 1998; 18:10180–8Young, MR Blackburn-Munro, G Dickinson, T Johnson, MJ Anderson, H Nakalembe, I Fleetwood-Walker, SM
Fig. 1. Experimental protocols. For preincision treatment (top  ), rats were anesthetized with halothane; the drug or vehicle was administered as a bolus injection (solid triangle) followed by an infusion (solid line). The incision (solid rectangle) was performed 15 min after the bolus intrathecal injection. For postincision treatment (bottom  ), the bolus injection (solid triangle) and the infusion (solid line) were started after the incision (solid rectangle). Rats were tested 1 h after incision and subsequently as shown.
Fig. 1. Experimental protocols. For preincision treatment (top 
	), rats were anesthetized with halothane; the drug or vehicle was administered as a bolus injection (solid triangle) followed by an infusion (solid line). The incision (solid rectangle) was performed 15 min after the bolus intrathecal injection. For postincision treatment (bottom 
	), the bolus injection (solid triangle) and the infusion (solid line) were started after the incision (solid rectangle). Rats were tested 1 h after incision and subsequently as shown.
Fig. 1. Experimental protocols. For preincision treatment (top  ), rats were anesthetized with halothane; the drug or vehicle was administered as a bolus injection (solid triangle) followed by an infusion (solid line). The incision (solid rectangle) was performed 15 min after the bolus intrathecal injection. For postincision treatment (bottom  ), the bolus injection (solid triangle) and the infusion (solid line) were started after the incision (solid rectangle). Rats were tested 1 h after incision and subsequently as shown.
×
Fig. 2. Effect of excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists on the development of withdrawal to punctate mechanical stimulation. Rats were tested before incision, from 1 to 6 h after incision and on postoperative days 1–6. The results are expressed as median (horizontal line) with first and third quartiles (boxes) and 10th and 90th percentiles (vertical lines). (A  ) Withdrawal thresholds in eight rats receiving vehicle administration before incision. (B  –D  ) Withdrawal thresholds in eight rats administered NBQX (B  ), MK-801 (C  ), or (+)-MCPG (D  ) before incision. (E  and F  ) Withdrawal thresholds after incision in eight vehicle-treated rats (E  ) and in eight rats administered NBQX after incision (F  ). *P  < 0.05 versus  preincision by Friedman and Dunnett test. †P  < 0.05 versus  vehicle by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn test.
Fig. 2. Effect of excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists on the development of withdrawal to punctate mechanical stimulation. Rats were tested before incision, from 1 to 6 h after incision and on postoperative days 1–6. The results are expressed as median (horizontal line) with first and third quartiles (boxes) and 10th and 90th percentiles (vertical lines). (A 
	) Withdrawal thresholds in eight rats receiving vehicle administration before incision. (B 
	–D 
	) Withdrawal thresholds in eight rats administered NBQX (B 
	), MK-801 (C 
	), or (+)-MCPG (D 
	) before incision. (E 
	and F 
	) Withdrawal thresholds after incision in eight vehicle-treated rats (E 
	) and in eight rats administered NBQX after incision (F 
	). *P 
	< 0.05 versus 
	preincision by Friedman and Dunnett test. †P 
	< 0.05 versus 
	vehicle by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn test.
Fig. 2. Effect of excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists on the development of withdrawal to punctate mechanical stimulation. Rats were tested before incision, from 1 to 6 h after incision and on postoperative days 1–6. The results are expressed as median (horizontal line) with first and third quartiles (boxes) and 10th and 90th percentiles (vertical lines). (A  ) Withdrawal thresholds in eight rats receiving vehicle administration before incision. (B  –D  ) Withdrawal thresholds in eight rats administered NBQX (B  ), MK-801 (C  ), or (+)-MCPG (D  ) before incision. (E  and F  ) Withdrawal thresholds after incision in eight vehicle-treated rats (E  ) and in eight rats administered NBQX after incision (F  ). *P  < 0.05 versus  preincision by Friedman and Dunnett test. †P  < 0.05 versus  vehicle by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn test.
×
Fig. 3. Effect of excitatory amino acid antagonists on the development of response to the nonpunctate mechanical stimulus 1–6 h after incision and on postoperative days 1–6. (A  and B  ) Response frequency (%) to the blunt mechanical stimulus after preincision treatment with vehicle, NBQX, MK-801 and (+)-MCPG. (C  ) Response frequency to a blunt mechanical stimulus in eight vehicle-treated rats and in eight rats administered NBQX after incision. *P  < 0.05 versus  preincision by Friedman and Dunnett test. †P  < 0.05 versus  saline by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn test. The results are expressed as the mean ± SD.
Fig. 3. Effect of excitatory amino acid antagonists on the development of response to the nonpunctate mechanical stimulus 1–6 h after incision and on postoperative days 1–6. (A 
	and B 
	) Response frequency (%) to the blunt mechanical stimulus after preincision treatment with vehicle, NBQX, MK-801 and (+)-MCPG. (C 
	) Response frequency to a blunt mechanical stimulus in eight vehicle-treated rats and in eight rats administered NBQX after incision. *P 
	< 0.05 versus 
	preincision by Friedman and Dunnett test. †P 
	< 0.05 versus 
	saline by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn test. The results are expressed as the mean ± SD.
Fig. 3. Effect of excitatory amino acid antagonists on the development of response to the nonpunctate mechanical stimulus 1–6 h after incision and on postoperative days 1–6. (A  and B  ) Response frequency (%) to the blunt mechanical stimulus after preincision treatment with vehicle, NBQX, MK-801 and (+)-MCPG. (C  ) Response frequency to a blunt mechanical stimulus in eight vehicle-treated rats and in eight rats administered NBQX after incision. *P  < 0.05 versus  preincision by Friedman and Dunnett test. †P  < 0.05 versus  saline by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn test. The results are expressed as the mean ± SD.
×
Table 1. Effect of It EAA Receptor Antagonists on Motor Function
Image not available
Table 1. Effect of It EAA Receptor Antagonists on Motor Function
×