Correspondence  |   November 2000
Ten Milligrams Intrathecal Bupivacaine Is Too High for Spinal Anesthesia for Hip Surgery in the Geriatric Population
Author Notes
  • Allegheny General Hospital
  • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Article Information
Correspondence   |   November 2000
Ten Milligrams Intrathecal Bupivacaine Is Too High for Spinal Anesthesia for Hip Surgery in the Geriatric Population
Anesthesiology 11 2000, Vol.93, 1365. doi:
Anesthesiology 11 2000, Vol.93, 1365. doi:
In Reply:—
Our finding of a 90% incidence of hypotension after single-dose (“conventional”) spinal anesthesia in elderly patients is consistent with the high incidence of hypotension reported in the literature. 1 Others have reported a 100% incidence of hypotension necessitating vasopressor treatment. 2 Buggy et al.  3 found a 75% incidence of systolic hypotension even with a volume loading of 500 ml hetastarch, 6%, plus 500 ml Hartmann’s solution. The strong association of spinal hypotension with ST depression in this patient population is cause for concern. 4 
Our choice of a 10-mg dose of spinal bupivacaine was intended to represent conventional practice and not necessarily the lowest dose of bupivacaine. This choice was arbitrary and, I suspect, underestimates the dosing used by many of our colleagues. The important point, however, is that, rather than treat hypotension, one can avoid it by using a low-dose local anesthetic plus an opiate spinal technique.
It is true that this technique provides a “nociceptive block” and does not provide a profound motor block. Certainly, there are surgeries in which the need for an intense motor block would necessitate higher doses of local anesthetic if one is to use spinal anesthesia. Likewise, there are surgeries (e.g.  , ambulatory) in which the absence of a profound motor block may be advantageous.
Our article did not intend to suggest that there is no other way to reduce the hypotension of spinal anesthesia. Titrated dosing with continuous spinal anesthesia is fairly effective in this regard, 2 but it is my impression that many practitioners prefer the speed and simplicity of a single-shot technique. Although unilateral spinal anesthesia might offer greater hemodynamic stability than bilateral blockade, at best it is impractical (time-consuming) when surgery is to be performed with the patient in the supine position.
Critchley LA: Hypotension, subarachnoid block and the elderly patient. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 1139–43Critchley, LA
Favarel-Garrigues JF, Sztark F, Petitjean ME, Thicoipe M, Lassie P, Dabadie P: Hemodynamic effects of spinal anesthesia in the elderly: Single dose versus titration through a catheter. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 312–6Favarel-Garrigues, JF Sztark, F Petitjean, ME Thicoipe, M Lassie, P Dabadie, P
Buggy DJ, Power CK, Meeke R, O’Callaghan S, Moran C, O’Brien GT: Prevention of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension in the elderly: I.m. methoxamine or combined hetastarch and crystalloid. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: 199–203Buggy, DJ Power, CK Meeke, R O’Callaghan, S Moran, C O’Brien, GT
Juelsgaard P, Sand NP, Felsby S, Dalsgaard J, Jakobsen KB, Brink O, Carlsson PS, Thygesen K: Perioperative myocardial ischaemia in patients undergoing surgery for fractured hip randomized to incremental spinal, single-dose spinal or general anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1998; 15: 656–63Juelsgaard, P Sand, NP Felsby, S Dalsgaard, J Jakobsen, KB Brink, O Carlsson, PS Thygesen, K