Free
Meeting Abstracts  |   October 2001
Ketamine Inhibits Endotoxin-induced Shock in Rats
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Takumi Taniguchi, M.D.
    *
  • Keizo Shibata, M.D.
  • Ken Yamamoto, M.D.
  • *Assistant Professor, †Associate Professor, Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, ‡Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine.
  • Received from the Departments of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine and Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Article Information
Meeting Abstracts   |   October 2001
Ketamine Inhibits Endotoxin-induced Shock in Rats
Anesthesiology 10 2001, Vol.95, 928-932. doi:
Anesthesiology 10 2001, Vol.95, 928-932. doi:
ENDOTOXIN shock, a common problem in patients with endotoxemia that often resists even intensive medical treatment, is characterized by profound hypotension, progressive metabolic acidosis, and dysfunction of multiple organs. Although its pathophysiology is not well defined, cytokines and nitric oxide (NO) are considered important in mediating the cardiovascular disturbance. 1–3 Circulating endotoxin increases production and release of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (IL-6), which are dilators of resistance vessels in skeletal muscle. 4 When macrophages are activated by endotoxin or cytokines, the inducible NO synthase gene is expressed. In turn, NO synthase is produced and, once activated, continuously releases large amounts of NO, which has a vasodilating effect. 5,6 Enhanced production of NO contributes importantly to the cardiovascular dysfunction.
Several investigators have documented that ketamine attenuates production and release of cytokines in endotoxemia in vitro  . 7–9 In addition, ketamine has been reported to inhibit accumulation of nitrite, a metabolite of NO, in a dose-dependent fashion in endotoxin-activated macrophages, 10 and also to inhibit induction of NO synthase activity and protein expression by endotoxin. 11 We therefore hypothesized that ketamine could inhibit development of cardiovascular dysfunction by attenuation of cytokine responses in sepsis. To test this hypothesis, we studied the effects of ketamine on hemodynamics, acid-base status, and plasma concentrations of TNF-α and IL-6 in endotoxin-exposed rats.
Materials and Methods
Animal Preparation
All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care Committee of Kanazawa University School of Medicine and were in accordance with the National Institutes of Health guidelines for animal use. Male Wistar rats (n = 40), weighing 373 ± 14 g (mean ± SD), were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital sodium (30 mg/kg). Ventilation was performed through a tracheotomy. The femoral artery was cannulated to monitor blood pressure and to draw blood samples. Lactated Ringer’s solution containing a muscle relaxant (pancuronium bromide, 0.02 mg/ml) and pentobarbital sodium (0.5 mg/ml) was infused continuously at a rate of 10 ml · kg1· h1through a femoral vein cannula, because animals anesthetized with this dose of pentobarbital alone did not demonstrate evidence of escape behavior. The heart rate was recorded from lead II of the electrocardiogram. The rats were connected to a pressure-controlled ventilator (Servo 900B, Siemens-Elema, Solna, Sweden) delivering 100% oxygen at a frequency of 30 breaths/min with an inspiratory:expiratory ratio of 1:1. The animals then were rested for at least 15 min to stabilize hemodynamics, followed by baseline readings of heart rate and systolic arterial pressure (SAP). In addition, data on arterial blood gases and acid-base status were obtained (ABL-520, Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark).
Experimental Protocols
After baseline measurements, animals were allocated randomly to one of five groups, three of which received endotoxin (n = 8 per group).
Endotoxin Group.
Endotoxin shock was induced by a bolus injection of endotoxin (15 mg/kg). We used lipopolysaccharide prepared from Escherichia coli  (0111:B4; Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI) as endotoxin.
Saline Control Group.
Animals received a bolus injection of 0.9% saline (1.0 mg/kg) followed by an infusion of 0.9% saline. Animals in this group were not exposed to endotoxin.
Ketamine Group.
Animals received a bolus injection of 0.9% saline (1.0 ml/kg), while ketamine was administered intravenously (10 mg · kg1· h1). Animals in this group were not exposed to endotoxin and served as controls to assess the sympathomimetic effects of ketamine.
Pretreatment Group.
This group received an infusion of ketamine (10 mg · kg1· h1). After initiation of infusion, a bolus dose of endotoxin (15 mg/kg) was given.
Posttreatment Group.
This group received a bolus dose of endotoxin (15 mg/kg) and, beginning 2 h later, received an infusion of ketamine (10 mg · kg1· h1). Rectal temperature was maintained between 36 and 38°C using a heating pad. An arterial blood sample (0.25 ml) was drawn hourly throughout the 5-h observation period for the measurement of arterial p  H, oxygen tension, carbon dioxide tension, and bicarbonate concentration. Furthermore, arterial blood samples (1.5 ml) were drawn for the measurement of plasma cytokine concentrations at 2, 4, and 5 h after the endotoxin or saline injection. The total amount of blood drawn from each animal was 5.5 ml over 5 h.
Sample Analysis
Blood used for determinations of cytokine concentrations was centrifuged for 10 min at 3,000 g  at 4°C. Plasma was decanted and stored at −70°C until analysis. Cytokine concentrations (TNF-α and IL-6) were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (BioSource, Camarillo, CA). The lower limits of detection for TNF-α and IL-6 were 4.5 and 7.0 pg/ml, respectively.
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean ± SD. Differences between groups at baseline were analyzed by Student unpaired t  test and Mann–Whitney U test. Hemodynamic and cytokine changes during the study were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures followed by post hoc  test (Bonferroni method). Statistical significance was defined at P  < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using the StatView application (version 5.0, Macintosh; Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA).
Results
Hemodynamics
No significant differences were noted in baseline heart rate or SAP between groups (fig. 1). Endotoxin injection decreased SAP in the endotoxin-alone and posttreatment groups but not in the saline control, ketamine-alone, or pretreatment groups. Five hours after endotoxin injection, SAP decreased by 77, 11, 43, 9, and 18% in the endotoxin-alone, saline control, posttreatment, ketamine-alone, and pretreatment groups, respectively. No significant differences in SAP occurred between the latter two groups at any time point during the experimental period. Thus, the hemodynamic response differed among the three groups receiving endotoxin. In contrast, the response to ketamine did not differ between the latter two groups, which received the same dose of the agent.
Fig. 1. The heart rate (top  ) and systolic arterial pressure (bottom  ) at baseline and after injection of endotoxin or saline (mean ± SD). Closed circles, endotoxin group; closed squares, saline control group; open squares, ketamine group; open circles, pretreatment group; open triangle, posttreatment group. #P  < 0.05 versus  endotoxin group.
Fig. 1. The heart rate (top 
	) and systolic arterial pressure (bottom 
	) at baseline and after injection of endotoxin or saline (mean ± SD). Closed circles, endotoxin group; closed squares, saline control group; open squares, ketamine group; open circles, pretreatment group; open triangle, posttreatment group. #P 
	< 0.05 versus 
	endotoxin group.
Fig. 1. The heart rate (top  ) and systolic arterial pressure (bottom  ) at baseline and after injection of endotoxin or saline (mean ± SD). Closed circles, endotoxin group; closed squares, saline control group; open squares, ketamine group; open circles, pretreatment group; open triangle, posttreatment group. #P  < 0.05 versus  endotoxin group.
×
Blood Gases
Carbon dioxide and oxygen tensions did not differ significantly between the five groups at any point during the experimental period (table 1). The endotoxin injection decreased arterial p  H and the bicarbonate concentration in the endotoxin-alone and posttreatment groups. At 5 h after injection, a significantly lower arterial p  H was observed in the endotoxin-alone group than in the other four groups. Thus, acid-base balance was maintained better in groups receiving ketamine.
Table 1. Arterial Blood Gas Values at Baseline and after the Endotoxin Injection
Image not available
Table 1. Arterial Blood Gas Values at Baseline and after the Endotoxin Injection
×
Plasma Cytokine Concentrations
All baseline values were similar in the five groups (fig. 2). Endotoxin injection increased the TNF-α concentration in the endotoxin-alone, pretreatment, and posttreatment groups, but the concentration remained significantly less in the pretreatment group than in the other two groups at 2 h after injection. Plasma concentrations of IL-6 became elevated in the endotoxin-alone and posttreatment groups. Significantly lower concentrations resulted in the pretreatment and posttreatment groups than in the endotoxin-alone group.
Fig. 2. Changes of plasma tumor necrosis factor α (TNF;top  ) and interleukin 6 (IL-6;bottom  ) at baseline and after injection of endotoxin or saline (mean ± SD). Closed circles, endotoxin group; closed squares, saline control group; open squares, ketamine group; open circles, pretreatment group; open triangle, posttreatment group. #P  < 0.05 versus  endotoxin group.
Fig. 2. Changes of plasma tumor necrosis factor α (TNF;top 
	) and interleukin 6 (IL-6;bottom 
	) at baseline and after injection of endotoxin or saline (mean ± SD). Closed circles, endotoxin group; closed squares, saline control group; open squares, ketamine group; open circles, pretreatment group; open triangle, posttreatment group. #P 
	< 0.05 versus 
	endotoxin group.
Fig. 2. Changes of plasma tumor necrosis factor α (TNF;top  ) and interleukin 6 (IL-6;bottom  ) at baseline and after injection of endotoxin or saline (mean ± SD). Closed circles, endotoxin group; closed squares, saline control group; open squares, ketamine group; open circles, pretreatment group; open triangle, posttreatment group. #P  < 0.05 versus  endotoxin group.
×
Discussion
Injection of endotoxin alone in the present experiments produced progressive hypotension, metabolic acidosis, and a large increase in plasma cytokine concentrations. Ketamine modified the hemodynamic and cytokine responses; when ketamine administration was initiated immediately before endotoxin injection, the responses were completely abolished; when ketamine was initiated 2 h after the endotoxin injection, the responses were modestly suppressed. Ketamine administration alone had minimal effects on hemodynamics and cytokine responses. Thus, ketamine administration inhibited development of hypotension and increase of cytokine concentrations in endotoxin-exposed rats, representing the most important findings of the current study.
Previous reports 4,12,13 also have described cardiovascular dysfunction after endotoxin injection, including hypotension and metabolic acidosis. Endotoxin has both direct and indirect cardiovascular effects, directly depressing myocardial contractility while indirectly producing peripheral vasodilation. This direct negative inotropic effect has been demonstrated in isolated heart muscle preparations. 14,15 The indirect effect on arterial smooth muscle results from increased production of cytokines and NO. 1–3 Circulating endotoxin increases production and release of TNF-α and IL-6, which are vasodilating agents. 4 In addition, endotoxin and the two cytokines activate macrophages, resulting in induction of NO synthase and release of large amounts of NO. 5,6 Increased NO production and release have been implicated in cardiovascular dysfunction and diminished response to vasoconstrictors in endotoxemia. 16 
Of particular interest is the inhibitory effect of ketamine on the production or release of IL-6 in vivo  . In our endotoxin-alone group, pronounced increases in plasma concentrations of TNF-α and IL-6 were observed. In the pretreatment group, the cytokine response was abolished, and these concentrations remained significantly lower than in the endotoxin-alone group. Ketamine has been reported to have a suppressive effect on the TNF-α production after endotoxin exposure in vivo  , 17 and the significantly lower concentrations of IL-6 demonstrated here may simply be a consequence of suppressed TNF-α production. In our posttreatment group, a marked increase in plasma TNF-α concentration was seen, as also occurred in the endotoxin-alone group; however, a significantly lower concentration of IL-6 was present 5 h after endotoxin injection (i.e.  , 3 h after initiation of ketamine administration). The difference between the endotoxin-alone and posttreatment groups cannot be explained simply by the suppressive effect of ketamine on TNF-α production. Kawasaki et al.  9 reported that ketamine inhibited not only endotoxin-induced IL-6 but also TNF-α–induced IL-6 production in vitro  . The current study indicated that ketamine independently affects production or release of IL-6 in endotoxemia in vivo  .
Our findings that ketamine pretreatment attenuated the cytokine response suggest that prevention of an increase in TNF-α and IL-6 was important in averting development of cardiovascular dysfunction. However, even in the posttreatment group, in which increases in these cytokines were similar to those in the endotoxin-alone group, SAP was preserved, and better acid-base balance was maintained. Therefore, inhibition of cardiovascular dysfunction in our pretreatment and posttreatment groups cannot be explained solely by prevention of increases in TNF-α and IL-6. Differences in NO production or other factors may be more important. Further studies need to focus on this point.
Ketamine has been recommended for induction of anesthesia and sedation in patients with circulatory failure because of its actions in increasing sympathetic nervous system activity, which tends to maintain blood pressure and preserve cardiovascular function. 18 This sympathomimetic property may have influenced our results somewhat, potentially obscuring the precise mechanisms responsible for inhibition of endotoxin shock in the current study. However, in the ketamine-alone group, administration of the agent produced no remarkable changes in hemodynamic parameters. Furthermore, other investigators have reported that, in patients with shock, including endotoxin shock, induction of anesthesia with ketamine can cause marked cardiovascular depression. 19 These considerations led us to conclude that preservation of hemodynamics observed in the pretreatment and posttreatment groups resulted from antiinflammatory effects rather than from sympathomimetic properties of the agent.
In the current study, we injected the high dose of endotoxin, which was approximately 2 × the 50% lethal dose. 20 Our previous study showed that this dose of endotoxin caused hypotension within 4 h after endotoxin injection in rats. 21 We used this dose to evaluate the cytokine responses in endotoxin-induced shock. Moreover, another important question is whether a dose–response relation exists between ketamine and hemodynamics and cytokine responses. The administration dose of ketamine (10 mg · kg1· h1) was relative high compared with those required to produced anesthesia in humans. However, the required maintenance dose of ketamine is known to be species-dependent and may be as high as 12 mg/kg in dogs. 22 Thus, the dose of ketamine in the current study is not surprising.
In summary, the current study showed that administration of ketamine inhibited hypotension, metabolic acidosis, and cytokine responses in rats receiving a single intravenous bolus dose of endotoxin. An inhibitory effect was found even when initiation of treatment was delayed until 2 h after endotoxin exposure. Although the mechanisms responsible for the inhibitory effects require further investigation, our results suggest that ketamine as an anesthetic agent may offer advantages in endotoxemia.
The authors thank Hirofumi Nagase, Ph.D. (Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan), for helpful advice with the statistical methods.
References
Tracey KJ, Beutler B, Lowry SF, Merryweather J, Wolpe S, Milsark IW, Hariri RJ, FaheyIII TJ, Zentella A, Albert JD, Shires GT, Cerami A: Shock and tissue injury induced by recombinant human cachectin. Science 1986; 234: 470–4Tracey, KJ Beutler, B Lowry, SF Merryweather, J Wolpe, S Milsark, IW Hariri, RJ FaheyIII, TJ Zentella, A Albert, JD Shires, GT Cerami, A
Minghini A, Britt LD, Hill MA: Interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 mediated skeletal muscle arteriolar vasodilation:In vitro  versus in vivo  studies. Shock 1998; 9: 210–5Minghini, A Britt, LD Hill, MA
Petros A, Lamb G, Leone A, Moncada S, Bennett D, Vallance P: Effect of a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor in humans with septic shock. Cardiovasc Res 1994; 28: 34–9Petros, A Lamb, G Leone, A Moncada, S Bennett, D Vallance, P
Forfia PR, Zhang X, Ochoa M, Xu X, Bernstein R, Ferreri NR, Hintze TH: Relationship between plasma NOx and cardiac and vascular dysfunction after LPS injection in anesthetized dogs. Am J Physiol 1998; 274: H193–201Forfia, PR Zhang, X Ochoa, M Xu, X Bernstein, R Ferreri, NR Hintze, TH
Stuehr DJ, Marletta MA: Induction of nitrite/nitrate synthesis in murine macrophages by BCG infection, lymphokines, or interferon-gamma. J Immunol 1987; 139: 518–25Stuehr, DJ Marletta, MA
Salvemini D, Korbut R, Anggard E, Vane J: Immediate release of a nitric oxide-like factor from bovine aortic endothelial cells by Escherichia coli  lipopolysaccharide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990; 87: 2593–7Salvemini, D Korbut, R Anggard, E Vane, J
Larsen B, Hoff G, Wilhelm W, Buchinger H, Wanner GA, Bauer M: Effect of intravenous anesthetics on spontaneous and endotoxin-stimulated cytokine response in cultured human whole blood. A nesthesiology 1998; 89: 1218–27Larsen, B Hoff, G Wilhelm, W Buchinger, H Wanner, GA Bauer, M
Takenaka I, Ogata M, Koga K, Matsumoto T, Shigematsu A: Ketamine suppresses endotoxin-induced tumor necrosis factor alpha production in mice. A nesthesiology 1994; 80: 402–8Takenaka, I Ogata, M Koga, K Matsumoto, T Shigematsu, A
Kawasaki T, Ogata M, Kawasaki C, Ogata J, Inoue Y, Shigematsu A: Ketamine suppresses proinflammatory cytokine production in human whole blood in vitro  . Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 665–9Kawasaki, T Ogata, M Kawasaki, C Ogata, J Inoue, Y Shigematsu, A
Simaoka M, Iida T, Ohara A, Taenaka N, Mashimo T, Honda T, Yoshiya I: Ketamine inhibits nitric oxide production in mouse-activated macrophage-like cells. Br J Anaesth 1996; 77: 238–42Simaoka, M Iida, T Ohara, A Taenaka, N Mashimo, T Honda, T Yoshiya, I
Li C, Chou T, Wong C, Ho S, Wu C, Yen M, Ding Y: Ketamine inhibits nitric oxide synthase in lipopolysaccharide-treated rat alveolar macrophages. Can J Anaesth 1997; 44: 989–95Li, C Chou, T Wong, C Ho, S Wu, C Yen, M Ding, Y
Natanson C, Eichenholz PW, Danner RL, Eichacker PQ, Hoffman WD, Kuo GC, Banks SM, Macvittie TJ, Parrillo JE: Endotoxin and tumor necrosis factor challenges in dogs simulate the cardiovascular profile of human septic shock. J Exp Med 1989; 169: 823–32Natanson, C Eichenholz, PW Danner, RL Eichacker, PQ Hoffman, WD Kuo, GC Banks, SM Macvittie, TJ Parrillo, JE
van Lambalgen AA, Bronsveld W, Bos GC, Thijs LG: Distribution of cardiac output, oxygen consumption and lactate production in canine endotoxin shock. Cardiovasc Res 1984; 18: 195–205van Lambalgen, AA Bronsveld, W Bos, GC Thijs, LG
Rubin LJ, Keller RS, Parker JL, Adams HR: Contractile dysfunction of ventricular myocytes isolated from endotoxemic guinea pigs. Shock 1994; 2: 113–20Rubin, LJ Keller, RS Parker, JL Adams, HR
Yasuda S, Lew WY: Lipopolysaccharide depresses cardiac contractility and beta-adrenergic contractile response by decreasing myofilament response to Ca2+ in cardiac myocytes. Circ Res 1997; 81: 1011–20Yasuda, S Lew, WY
Hollenberg SM, Cunnion RE, Zimmerberg J: Nitric oxide synthase inhibition reverses arteriolar hyporesponsiveness to catecholamines in septic rats. Am J Physiol 1993; 264: H660–3Hollenberg, SM Cunnion, RE Zimmerberg, J
Koga K, Ogata M, Takenaka I, Matsumoto T, Shigematsu A: Ketamine suppresses tumor necrosis factor-α activity and mortality in carrageenan-sensitized endotoxin shock model. Circ Shock 1995; 44: 160–8Koga, K Ogata, M Takenaka, I Matsumoto, T Shigematsu, A
White PF, Way WL, Trevor AJ: Ketamine: Its pharmacology and therapeutic uses. A nesthesiology 1982; 56: 119–36White, PF Way, WL Trevor, AJ
Waxman K, Shoemaker WC, Lippmann M: Cardiovascular effects of anesthetic induction with ketamine. Anesth Analg 1980; 59: 355–8Waxman, K Shoemaker, WC Lippmann, M
McCuskey RS, McCuskey PA, Urbaschek R, Urbaschek B: Species differences in kupffer cells and endotoxin sensitivity. Infect Immun 1984; 45: 278–80McCuskey, RS McCuskey, PA Urbaschek, R Urbaschek, B
Taniguchi T, Yamamoto K, Ohmoto N, Ohta K, Kobayashi T: Effects of propofol on hemodynamic and inflammatory responses to endotoxemia in rats. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 1101–6Taniguchi, T Yamamoto, K Ohmoto, N Ohta, K Kobayashi, T
Modig J: Positive effects of ketamine v. metomidate anesthesia on cardiovascular function, oxygen delivery and survival. Acta Chir Scand 1987; 153: 7–13Modig, J
Fig. 1. The heart rate (top  ) and systolic arterial pressure (bottom  ) at baseline and after injection of endotoxin or saline (mean ± SD). Closed circles, endotoxin group; closed squares, saline control group; open squares, ketamine group; open circles, pretreatment group; open triangle, posttreatment group. #P  < 0.05 versus  endotoxin group.
Fig. 1. The heart rate (top 
	) and systolic arterial pressure (bottom 
	) at baseline and after injection of endotoxin or saline (mean ± SD). Closed circles, endotoxin group; closed squares, saline control group; open squares, ketamine group; open circles, pretreatment group; open triangle, posttreatment group. #P 
	< 0.05 versus 
	endotoxin group.
Fig. 1. The heart rate (top  ) and systolic arterial pressure (bottom  ) at baseline and after injection of endotoxin or saline (mean ± SD). Closed circles, endotoxin group; closed squares, saline control group; open squares, ketamine group; open circles, pretreatment group; open triangle, posttreatment group. #P  < 0.05 versus  endotoxin group.
×
Fig. 2. Changes of plasma tumor necrosis factor α (TNF;top  ) and interleukin 6 (IL-6;bottom  ) at baseline and after injection of endotoxin or saline (mean ± SD). Closed circles, endotoxin group; closed squares, saline control group; open squares, ketamine group; open circles, pretreatment group; open triangle, posttreatment group. #P  < 0.05 versus  endotoxin group.
Fig. 2. Changes of plasma tumor necrosis factor α (TNF;top 
	) and interleukin 6 (IL-6;bottom 
	) at baseline and after injection of endotoxin or saline (mean ± SD). Closed circles, endotoxin group; closed squares, saline control group; open squares, ketamine group; open circles, pretreatment group; open triangle, posttreatment group. #P 
	< 0.05 versus 
	endotoxin group.
Fig. 2. Changes of plasma tumor necrosis factor α (TNF;top  ) and interleukin 6 (IL-6;bottom  ) at baseline and after injection of endotoxin or saline (mean ± SD). Closed circles, endotoxin group; closed squares, saline control group; open squares, ketamine group; open circles, pretreatment group; open triangle, posttreatment group. #P  < 0.05 versus  endotoxin group.
×
Table 1. Arterial Blood Gas Values at Baseline and after the Endotoxin Injection
Image not available
Table 1. Arterial Blood Gas Values at Baseline and after the Endotoxin Injection
×