Free
Education  |   December 2001
The Effect of Prone Positioning on Intraocular Pressure in Anesthetized Patients
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Mary Ann Cheng, M.D.
    *
  • Alexandre Todorov, Ph.D.
  • René Tempelhoff, M.D.
  • Tom McHugh, C.R.N.A.
  • C. Michael Crowder, M.D., Ph.D.
    *
  • Carl Lauryssen, M.B., Ch.B.
    §
  • * Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, † Research Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, ‡ Professor, Departments of Anesthesiology and Neurological Surgery, § Assistant Professor, Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine. ∥ Nurse Anesthetist, Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University.
  • Received from the Departments of Anesthesiology and Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Article Information
Education
Education   |   December 2001
The Effect of Prone Positioning on Intraocular Pressure in Anesthetized Patients
Anesthesiology 12 2001, Vol.95, 1351-1355. doi:
Anesthesiology 12 2001, Vol.95, 1351-1355. doi:
IN a recent survey of 801 anesthesiologists by the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation, blindness due to anesthetic technique was ranked 11th highest among a total of 53 patient-safety concerns. 1 Numerous reports of visual loss after spine surgery in the prone position exist in the literature. 2–6 Most of these episodes do not appear to be related to direct pressure to the eye but rather to a change in the hemodynamics affecting optic nerve perfusion. Ocular perfusion pressure is commonly defined as the difference between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and intraocular pressure (IOP). 7 This simple equation has led some authors to advocate maintenance of intraoperative MAP in the normal to high–normal range during these procedures. However, ocular perfusion pressure is also indirectly related to IOP, which has not been studied in this context.
Because an increase in IOP can lower ocular perfusion pressure despite the maintenance of normal MAP, it is important to understand what happens to IOP in the prone anesthetized patient. In a study of awake volunteers, IOP increased from 13.5 ± 2.01 mmHg in the sitting position to 20.0 ± 3.27 mmHg in the prone position, 8 suggesting that prone positioning intraoperatively may also increase IOP. However, the use of general anesthesia has been shown to decrease IOP in the supine position. 9 The balance between the opposing effects of general anesthesia and prone positioning likely plays an important role in the net ocular perfusion pressure. The purpose of the current study was to examine the combined effects of general anesthesia and the prone position on IOP in patients undergoing spine surgery.
Materials and Methods
After approval by the human studies committee, informed consent was obtained from 20 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I–III), aged 18–80 yr, scheduled for spine surgery in the prone position. Patients with preexisting eye disease or previous eye surgery, allergy to tetracaine, or allergy to latex were not enrolled in the study. Before commencement of the study, intravenous catheters and standard anesthetic monitors (i.e.  , blood pressure cuff, electrocardiograph, and pulse oximeter) were placed for all patients.
Both eyes were topically anesthetized with 0.5% tetracaine hydrochloride drops, and baseline IOP was measured in the supine position before premedication (baseline) with a Tono-pen®XL handheld tonometer (Mentor, Norwell, MA). The tonometer operates on the principle of the Imbert–Fick law: P = F/A, where P = intraocular pressure, F = the amount of force exerted by the tonometer to flatten a specific area of the eye, and A = the area flattened.
The Tono-pen®XL contains a strain gauge that converts IOP measurements to an electrical signal. The tonometer averages four successful readings and displays the mean and SD. Measurements were retaken if the range was greater than 5%. At the time of each tonometer reading, the following data set was collected: MAP, heart rate, end-tidal carbon dioxide, end-tidal isoflurane, percent inspired oxygen, and peak inspiratory pressure.
Anesthesia protocol was standardized for all study patients. After the baseline IOP measurement, the patients were given midazolam (0.7 mg/kg). Anesthesia induction consisted of administration of pentothal (3–5 mg/kg) and rocuronium (1 mg/kg) to facilitate endotracheal intubation. After endotracheal intubation, anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane (< 0.5%), 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen, fentanyl infusion (1–2 μg · kg−1· h−1), and rocuronium as needed. MAP was kept within 20% of awake value, and ventilation was adjusted to keep end-tidal carbon dioxide in the range of 30–35 mmHg throughout the intraoperative period. Ten minutes after intubation, the IOP was measured with the patient anesthetized and supine (supine 1).
All patients were turned prone and their heads positioned in the neutral position with a pinned head-holder to prevent any extraocular pressure. Neck flexion and extension were limited to less than 15 degrees from the horizontal. IOP was measured at the following times and positions: before incision in the prone position (prone 1), at conclusion of surgery in the prone position (prone 2), and supine before pharmacological reversal of muscle relaxants and emergence from anesthesia (supine 2). Surgery proceeded as usual. All fluids and blood products administered were recorded, and estimated blood loss and urine output were measured. The length of time in the prone position was noted. Hematocrit was recorded for each patient preoperatively and postoperatively. In the recovery room, patients were asked about any vision changes or eye discomfort.
Statistical Analysis
The data were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance, followed by paired t  tests for comparisons across successive time points. Spearman rank coefficients were used to determine correlations. Data are reported as mean ± SD. Data were analyzed with use of the Statistical Analysis System (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
Results
Informed consent was obtained from 20 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I–III; 12 males and 8 females) without a history of eye disease or previous eye surgery. Demographic data are shown in table 1. The mean patient weight was 80 ± 20 kg, and the mean height was 173 ± 13 cm. No statistical difference was found between the measurements from the right and left eyes, so measurements from the right eye were used for statistical analysis. The hypothesis of constant IOP was rejected on the basis of repeated-measures analysis of variance (P  < 0.0001). Supine 1 IOP (13 ± 1 mmHg) was significantly decreased from baseline IOP (19 ± 1 mmHg;P  < 0.05). Prone 1 IOP (27 ± 2 mmHg) was significantly higher than both supine 1 IOP (P  < 0.05) and baseline IOP (P  < 0.05). Prone 2 IOP (40 ± 2 mmHg) was measured after 320 ± 107 min in the prone position and was significantly higher than all previous measurements (P  < 0.05 for all). Supine 2 IOP (31 ± 2 mmHg) remained significantly elevated in comparison with baseline and supine 1 IOP (P  < 0.05 for both). Longer time in the prone position was associated with higher prone 2 IOP (P  < 0.05; r2= 0.6;fig. 1). During the period between prone 1 and prone 2 measurements, MAP, heart rate, end-tidal isoflurane, end-tidal carbon dioxide, and peak inspiratory pressure values did not significantly change (P  > 0.05;table 2). Mean fluid balance, defined as [crystalloid (ml) + colloid (ml) + blood products (ml)]−[urine output (ml) + estimated blood loss (ml)], was positive (3,292 ± 1,120 ml).
Table 1. Demographic Data
Image not available
Table 1. Demographic Data
×
Fig. 1. Intraocular pressure (IOP) at conclusion of prone positioning (prone 2) is correlated with total time spent in the prone position, in minutes (P  < 0.05; r2= 0.6; n = 20). Prone 2 IOP ranged from 25 to 54 mmHg, and total time in the prone position ranged from 120 to 500 min.
Fig. 1. Intraocular pressure (IOP) at conclusion of prone positioning (prone 2) is correlated with total time spent in the prone position, in minutes (P 
	< 0.05; r2= 0.6; n = 20). Prone 2 IOP ranged from 25 to 54 mmHg, and total time in the prone position ranged from 120 to 500 min.
Fig. 1. Intraocular pressure (IOP) at conclusion of prone positioning (prone 2) is correlated with total time spent in the prone position, in minutes (P  < 0.05; r2= 0.6; n = 20). Prone 2 IOP ranged from 25 to 54 mmHg, and total time in the prone position ranged from 120 to 500 min.
×
Table 2. Hemodynamic and Ventilatory Parameters
Image not available
Table 2. Hemodynamic and Ventilatory Parameters
×
Discussion
The current study is the first to measure IOP in prone anesthetized patients. Confirming previous data, 10 our study demonstrated a decrease in IOP with the addition of general anesthesia in the supine position. Upon prone positioning, the IOP significantly increased in the anesthetized patients. There was a further significant increase after 320 ± 107 min of surgery. Similar results were reported by Lam et al.  8 in awake volunteers. They found that IOP after 8 min in the prone position was increased (20.0 ± 3.27 mmHg) when compared to the supine position (14.1±1.92 mmHg;P  < 0.05). Interestingly, compared to the Lam study, our measurements of IOP in prone position were higher despite the presence of general anesthesia. This difference is likely due to the fact that our measurements were made after a longer average time in prone position.
The most accurate method of measuring IOP over a period of time is invasive and continuous. This type of recording was reported in a series of two patients who had their IOP continuously measured for up to 96 h via  a probe implanted in the anterior chamber of the eye. 11 Because of the associated risks involved, this method of IOP measurement is impractical to propose for patients undergoing spine surgery. We opted instead to use the hand-held Tono-pen®XL tonometer, which can be used in any position and requires contact with the eye. This is the same equipment used by ophthalmologists to screen patients for glaucoma. Setogawa validated the methodology in rabbits by comparing IOP measurements made by an intraocular needle transducer versus  the Tono-pen®XL and found a good correlation. 12 A larger, more expensive option is the hand-held noncontact tonometer, which uses an air pulse to measure IOP. A proposed noninvasive method of measuring IOP continuously is use of a contact lens with a pressure transducer, which is currently in development. 13 
Our study design had a flaw in that the prone 2 measurement was made at a uniform clinically relevant event (i.e.  , end of surgery) rather than at a uniform time point (e.g.  , 2 h in prone position). Because of the concerns with possible corneal injury, the number of IOP measurements in the prone position were limited to two in this pilot study. We chose the end of surgery to study the effect of length of surgery. We found a direct correlation between the amount of time spent in the prone position and the magnitude of the last prone IOP measurement, which suggests a linear relation, although data from only two points are insufficient for discerning this relation. Future studies will include IOP measurements made at more frequent time-based units because there were no tonometer-related complications in this series of 20 patients.
There are reports in the literature of blindness in the prone position, due to increased extraocular pressure resulting from using a cushion or horseshoe headrest to position the head. 14,15 To eliminate the effects of any extraocular pressure in this study, all of our patients were positioned in neutral position with a pinned head-holder. It is surprising that our data demonstrated IOP increases in the prone position in the headholder, suggesting that a factor other than extraocular pressure (e.g.  , a horseshoe headrest) is responsible for this increase.
Deliberate hypotension has been advocated for spine surgery to decrease intraoperative blood loss. 16 However, hypotension itself may decrease ocular perfusion pressure (i.e.  , ocular perfusion pressure = MAP − IOP). Some authors have suggested that deliberate hypotension may decrease IOP, 10 but this was not demonstrated in a porcine model. 17 MAP was maintained within the normal range in our protocol without significant differences between prone 1 and prone 2 measurements, so we were unable to observe the effect of hypotension on IOP in the prone position.
The prone position may increase peritoneal pressure and in turn central venous pressure, peak inspiratory pressure, and IOP. In patients without glaucoma, IOP did not increase during short laparoscopic surgery requiring pneumoperitoneum in the lithotomy position. 18 However, a study by the same group demonstrated a significant increase in IOP when anesthetized rabbits with glaucoma were placed in a head-down position. 19 In our study, there were no significant changes in the peak inspiratory pressure during the prone position study period, and central venous pressure was not measured. Therefore, the effects of peak inspiratory pressure and central venous pressure on IOP in the prone position were not assessed.
IOP has been shown to increase in anesthetized patients in the supine head-down (Trendelenberg) position 10 and in awake vertically inverted volunteers. 20 The mechanism for this increase may be related to higher episcleral venous pressure. In a study of inverted humans, Friberg et al.  21 found a 1-mmHg increase in IOP for every 0.83 ± 0.21 mmHg increase in episcleral venous pressure. To optimize the operative site, a slight head-down position may be used, which may contribute to a further increase in the IOP in the prone position. Therefore, a head-neutral or head-up position may attenuate the observed IOP increase in the prone position.
Increased arterial carbon dioxide tension can contribute to an increase in IOP during general anesthesia in the supine position. 22 There is evidence that although arterial carbon dioxide tension remains unchanged when moving an anesthetized patient to the prone position, 23 the arterial carbon dioxide tension–end-tidal carbon dioxide gradient can increase 24 . The end-tidal carbon dioxide value remained constant in our study. However, it may be possible that the arterial carbon dioxide tension was slightly higher at the end of surgery, which could contribute to the observed increase in IOP.
Increased IOP may also be related to the observed positive intraoperative fluid balance. Supporting this hypothesis is evidence in healthy volunteers that acute oral water loading (14 ml/kg) increased IOP, 25 whereas exercise-induced dehydration reduced IOP. 26 Decreased serum osmolality during dialysis increased IOP in patients with renal failure. 27 In another report, three severely burned patients were found to have IOPs in the range of 37.2–81.7 mmHg that were due to extreme orbital congestion related to large amounts of intravenous fluid. 28 Similarly, IOP increased in anesthetized patients immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass was started, while arterial perfusion pressure and hematocrit levels concurrently decreased. 29 Prospective controlled studies are needed to discern if there is a relation between fluid balance and IOP in the prone position.
Conclusion
This study represents an initial attempt to elucidate a probable mechanism for the recently recognized problem of visual loss after spine surgery. We did not intend to establish a cause-and-effect relation between IOP changes and visual loss. Rather, our goal was to isolate and examine the IOP piece of the ocular perfusion pressure puzzle. Our findings show that the prone position increases IOP in the anesthetized patient, suggesting that a concurrent drop in MAP could be deleterious to the eye. Because we were fortunate that none of the patients suffered postoperative visual loss, we cannot make any conclusions regarding the role of IOP and postoperative visual loss. Further work needs to be done to determine the time course, etiology, and possible treatment of the IOP increase in prone anesthetized patients undergoing spine surgery.
References
Stoelting RK: APSF survey results identify safety issues priorities. Anesth Patient Safety Foundation Newsletter 1999; 14: 6–7Stoelting, RK
Brown RH, Schauble JF, Miller NR: Anemia and hypotension as contributors to perioperative loss of vision. A nesthesiology 1994; 80: 222–6Brown, RH Schauble, JF Miller, NR
Cheng MA, Sigurdson W, Tempelhoff R, Lauryssen C: Visual loss after spine surgery: A survey. Neurosurgery 2000; 46: 625–31Cheng, MA Sigurdson, W Tempelhoff, R Lauryssen, C
Myers MA, Hamilton SR, Bogosian AJ, Smith CH, Wagner TA: Visual loss as a complication of spine surgery: A review of 37 cases. Spine 1997; 22: 1325–9Myers, MA Hamilton, SR Bogosian, AJ Smith, CH Wagner, TA
Stevens WR, Glazer PA, Kelley SD, Lietman TM, Bradford DS: Ophthalmologic complications after spine surgery. Spine 1997; 22: 1319–24Stevens, WR Glazer, PA Kelley, SD Lietman, TM Bradford, DS
Williams EL, Hart WM, Tempelhoff R: Postoperative ischemic optic neuropathy. Anesth Analg 1995; 80: 1018–29Williams, EL Hart, WM Tempelhoff, R
Hayreh SS: Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Clin Neurosci 1997; 4: 251–63Hayreh, SS
Lam AK, Douthwaite WA: Does the change of anterior chamber depth or/and episcleral venous pressure cause intraocular pressure change in postural variation? Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74: 664–7Lam, AK Douthwaite, WA
Murphy DF: Anesthesia and intraocular pressure. Anesth Analg 1985; 64: 520–30Murphy, DF
Tsamparlakis J, Casey TA, Howell W, Edridge A: Dependence of intraocular pressure on induced hypotension and posture during surgical anaesthesia. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 1980; 100: 521–6Tsamparlakis, J Casey, TA Howell, W Edridge, A
Hoh H, Schwanengel M: Continuous intraocular pressure measurement over several days with the Codman microsensor: A case report [German]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1999; 215: 186–96Hoh, H Schwanengel, M
Setogawa A, Kawai Y: Measurement of intraocular pressure by both invasive and noninvasive techniques in rabbits exposed to head-down tilt. Japan J Physiol 1998; 48: 25–31Setogawa, A Kawai, Y
Draeger J, Michelson G, Rumberger E: Continuous assessment of intraocular pressure–telematic transmission, even under flight- or space mission conditions. Eur J Med Res 2000; 5: 2–4Draeger, J Michelson, G Rumberger, E
Bekar A, Tureyen K, Aksoy K: Unilateral blindness due to patient positioning during cervical syringomyelia surgery: Unilateral blindness after prone position. J Neurosurg Anesth 1996; 8: 227–9Bekar, A Tureyen, K Aksoy, K
Grossman W, Ward WT: Central retinal artery occlusion after scoliosis surgery with a horseshoe headrest: Case report and literature review. Spine 1993; 18: 1226–8Grossman, W Ward, WT
Ullrich PF Jr, Keene JS, Hogan KJ, Roecker EB: Results of hypotensive anesthesia in operative treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. J Spinal Disord 1990; 3: 329–33Ullrich, PF Keene, JS Hogan, KJ Roecker, EB
Jantzen J-P, Hennes HJ, Rochels R, Wallenfang T: Deliberate arterial hypotension does not reduce intraocular pressure in pigs. A nesthesiology 1992; 77: 536–40Jantzen, J-P Hennes, HJ Rochels, R Wallenfang, T
Lentschener C, Benhamou D, Niessen F, Mercier FJ, Fernandez H: Intraocular pressure changes during gynaecological laparoscopy. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 1006–8Lentschener, C Benhamou, D Niessen, F Mercier, FJ Fernandez, H
Lentschener C, Leveque JP, Mazoit JX, Benhamou D: The effect of pneumoperitoneum on intraocular pressure in rabbits with α-chymotrypsin-induced glaucoma. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 1283–8Lentschener, C Leveque, JP Mazoit, JX Benhamou, D
Draeger J, Hanke K: Postural variations of intraocular pressure: Preflight experiments for the D1-mission. Ophthalmic Res 1986; 18: 55–60Draeger, J Hanke, K
Friberg TR, Weinreb RN: Ocular manifestations of gravity inversion. JAMA 1985; 253: 1755–7Friberg, TR Weinreb, RN
Hvidberg A, Kessing SV, Fernandes A: Effect of changes in PCO2and body positions on intraocular pressure during general anaesthesia. Acta Ophthalmol 1981; 59: 465–75Hvidberg, A Kessing, SV Fernandes, A
Pelosi P, Croci M, Calappi E, Mulazzi D, Cerisara M, Vercesi P, Vicardi P, Gattinoni L: The prone position during anesthesia minimally affects respiratory mechanics while improving functional residual capacity and increasing oxygen tensions. Anesth Analg 1995; 80: 955–60Pelosi, P Croci, M Calappi, E Mulazzi, D Cerisara, M Vercesi, P Vicardi, P Gattinoni, L
Wahba RWM, Tessler MJ, Kardash KJ: Carbon dioxide tensions during anesthesia in the prone position. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 668–9Wahba, RWM Tessler, MJ Kardash, KJ
Brucculeri M, Hammel T, Harris A, Malinovsky V, Martin B: Regulation of intraocular pressure after water drinking. J Glaucoma 1999; 8: 111–6Brucculeri, M Hammel, T Harris, A Malinovsky, V Martin, B
Martin B, Harris A, Hammel T, Malinovsky V: Mechanism of exercise-induced ocular hypotension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: 1011–5Martin, B Harris, A Hammel, T Malinovsky, V
Tawara A: Intraocular pressure during hemodialysis [Japanese]. Sangyo Ika Daigaku Zasshi 2000; 22: 33–43Tawara, A
Evans LS: Increased intraocular pressure in severely burned patients. Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 111: 56–8Evans, LS
Bavbek T, Kazokoglu H, Temel A: Intraocular pressure variations during extracorporeal circulation and some influencing factors. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991; 39: 29–31Bavbek, T Kazokoglu, H Temel, A
Fig. 1. Intraocular pressure (IOP) at conclusion of prone positioning (prone 2) is correlated with total time spent in the prone position, in minutes (P  < 0.05; r2= 0.6; n = 20). Prone 2 IOP ranged from 25 to 54 mmHg, and total time in the prone position ranged from 120 to 500 min.
Fig. 1. Intraocular pressure (IOP) at conclusion of prone positioning (prone 2) is correlated with total time spent in the prone position, in minutes (P 
	< 0.05; r2= 0.6; n = 20). Prone 2 IOP ranged from 25 to 54 mmHg, and total time in the prone position ranged from 120 to 500 min.
Fig. 1. Intraocular pressure (IOP) at conclusion of prone positioning (prone 2) is correlated with total time spent in the prone position, in minutes (P  < 0.05; r2= 0.6; n = 20). Prone 2 IOP ranged from 25 to 54 mmHg, and total time in the prone position ranged from 120 to 500 min.
×
Table 1. Demographic Data
Image not available
Table 1. Demographic Data
×
Table 2. Hemodynamic and Ventilatory Parameters
Image not available
Table 2. Hemodynamic and Ventilatory Parameters
×