Free
Erratum  |   May 2004
ERRATUM
Article Information
Erratum
Erratum   |   May 2004
ERRATUM
Anesthesiology 5 2004, Vol.100, 1337. doi:
Anesthesiology 5 2004, Vol.100, 1337. doi:
THE article by Xu et al.  entitled “Halothane and Isoflurane Augment Depolarization-induced Cytosolic CA2+Transients and Attenuate Carbachol-stimulated CA2+Transients” was published in the June 2000 issue of the Journal (Anesthesiology 2000; 92:1746–56) with an error in the labeling of figure 4. The corrected figure and legend appear below. The authors regret this error.
Fig. 4. (A–E  ) Representative traces of [CA2+]cyt-changes with sequential stimulation using 100 mm KCl followed by 1 mm carbachol (CAB). (A  ) Control. (B–F  ) Cells were pretreated for 5 min with 10 mm caffeine (CAF). (B  ), 1 μm thapsigargin (TG) (C  ), 10 mm CAF and 1 μm TG (D  ), 10 mm CAF and 1 μm CAB (E  ), or with 1 μm TG and 1 μm CAB (F  ). (G, H  ) Statistical summary. Values presented are mean ± SEM (n = 2–19). The significance of the differences among different groups was tested using the Student-Neumann-Keuls test and labeled as follows:*P  < 0.05 to the control group; $P  < 0.05 to the TG group.
Fig. 4. (A–E 
	) Representative traces of [CA2+]cyt-changes with sequential stimulation using 100 mm KCl followed by 1 mm carbachol (CAB). (A 
	) Control. (B–F 
	) Cells were pretreated for 5 min with 10 mm caffeine (CAF). (B 
	), 1 μm thapsigargin (TG) (C 
	), 10 mm CAF and 1 μm TG (D 
	), 10 mm CAF and 1 μm CAB (E 
	), or with 1 μm TG and 1 μm CAB (F 
	). (G, H 
	) Statistical summary. Values presented are mean ± SEM (n = 2–19). The significance of the differences among different groups was tested using the Student-Neumann-Keuls test and labeled as follows:*P 
	< 0.05 to the control group; $P 
	< 0.05 to the TG group.
Fig. 4. (A–E  ) Representative traces of [CA2+]cyt-changes with sequential stimulation using 100 mm KCl followed by 1 mm carbachol (CAB). (A  ) Control. (B–F  ) Cells were pretreated for 5 min with 10 mm caffeine (CAF). (B  ), 1 μm thapsigargin (TG) (C  ), 10 mm CAF and 1 μm TG (D  ), 10 mm CAF and 1 μm CAB (E  ), or with 1 μm TG and 1 μm CAB (F  ). (G, H  ) Statistical summary. Values presented are mean ± SEM (n = 2–19). The significance of the differences among different groups was tested using the Student-Neumann-Keuls test and labeled as follows:*P  < 0.05 to the control group; $P  < 0.05 to the TG group.
×
Fig. 4. (A–E  ) Representative traces of [CA2+]cyt-changes with sequential stimulation using 100 mm KCl followed by 1 mm carbachol (CAB). (A  ) Control. (B–F  ) Cells were pretreated for 5 min with 10 mm caffeine (CAF). (B  ), 1 μm thapsigargin (TG) (C  ), 10 mm CAF and 1 μm TG (D  ), 10 mm CAF and 1 μm CAB (E  ), or with 1 μm TG and 1 μm CAB (F  ). (G, H  ) Statistical summary. Values presented are mean ± SEM (n = 2–19). The significance of the differences among different groups was tested using the Student-Neumann-Keuls test and labeled as follows:*P  < 0.05 to the control group; $P  < 0.05 to the TG group.
Fig. 4. (A–E 
	) Representative traces of [CA2+]cyt-changes with sequential stimulation using 100 mm KCl followed by 1 mm carbachol (CAB). (A 
	) Control. (B–F 
	) Cells were pretreated for 5 min with 10 mm caffeine (CAF). (B 
	), 1 μm thapsigargin (TG) (C 
	), 10 mm CAF and 1 μm TG (D 
	), 10 mm CAF and 1 μm CAB (E 
	), or with 1 μm TG and 1 μm CAB (F 
	). (G, H 
	) Statistical summary. Values presented are mean ± SEM (n = 2–19). The significance of the differences among different groups was tested using the Student-Neumann-Keuls test and labeled as follows:*P 
	< 0.05 to the control group; $P 
	< 0.05 to the TG group.
Fig. 4. (A–E  ) Representative traces of [CA2+]cyt-changes with sequential stimulation using 100 mm KCl followed by 1 mm carbachol (CAB). (A  ) Control. (B–F  ) Cells were pretreated for 5 min with 10 mm caffeine (CAF). (B  ), 1 μm thapsigargin (TG) (C  ), 10 mm CAF and 1 μm TG (D  ), 10 mm CAF and 1 μm CAB (E  ), or with 1 μm TG and 1 μm CAB (F  ). (G, H  ) Statistical summary. Values presented are mean ± SEM (n = 2–19). The significance of the differences among different groups was tested using the Student-Neumann-Keuls test and labeled as follows:*P  < 0.05 to the control group; $P  < 0.05 to the TG group.
×