Free
Education  |   March 2003
Gabapentin Markedly Reduces Acetic Acid–induced Visceral Nociception
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Yi Feng, M.D.
    *
  • Minglei Cui, Ph.D.
  • William D. Willis, M.D., Ph.D.
  • *Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University People's Hospital. Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, University of Texas Medical Branch. †Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, University of Texas Medical Branch. Research Scientist, Biological Science, Allergan, Inc. ‡Professor and Chairman, Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, University of Texas Medical Branch.
  • Received from the Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, P. R. China; the Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; and Biological Science, Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California.
Article Information
Education
Education   |   March 2003
Gabapentin Markedly Reduces Acetic Acid–induced Visceral Nociception
Anesthesiology 3 2003, Vol.98, 729-733. doi:
Anesthesiology 3 2003, Vol.98, 729-733. doi:
GABAPENTIN is a novel, well-tolerated, anticonvulsant drug structurally related to γ-aminobutyric acid. Evidence obtained in a number of experimental models of neuropathic pain and inflammatory hyperalgesia 1–4 shows that gabapentin has an effective antinociceptive or antihyperalgesic action, in addition to being an anticonvulsant. Effects of gabapentin on the electrophysiological properties of dorsal horn neurons in the spinal cords of normal and hyperalgesic adult rats with diabetic neuropathy were investigated by Patel et al.  5 
Moreover, gabapentin monotherapy appears to be efficacious for the treatment of pain and sleep interference associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy and exhibits positive effects on mood and quality of life. 6–8 Gabapentin has been used successfully to reduce neuropathic pain in a series of patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy 9 and a patient with postherpetic neuralgia. 10 
The pharmacological safety profile of gabapentin has attracted more and more attention from basic and clinical investigators. Although the mechanism of action of gabapentin is still not understood, a highly specific gabapentin binding site in the brain has been described by Suman-Chauhan et al.  11 This is identified as the α2δ subunit of calcium channels. In addition, evidence from several laboratories has demonstrated that gabapentin treatment may involve glutamate metabolism and release. 12,13 
Gabapentin has been demonstrated to act within the spinal cord or brain to reduce sensitization of dorsal horn neurons. It is not effective in reducing immediate pain from injury, but it appears to reduce abnormal hypersensitivity induced by inflammatory responses or nerve injury. The acetic acid–induced visceral pain model is widely used in experimental research. It can produce not only abdominal contractions, but also gastrointestinal ileus. 14 
The excitatory amino acids, glutamate and aspartate, are likely neurotransmitter candidates for inflammatory nociceptive transmission. Both glutamate and aspartate are found in small myelinated and unmyelinated primary afferent neurons. 15 Although there are several case reports in which gabapentin is regarded as an adjunctive agent, assisting in refractory genitourinary tract pain control, 16,17 little is known about an action of gabapentin on visceral pain. Furthermore, its relation to excitatory amino acid release has not yet been demonstrated. The aim of this study is to test whether gabapentin is able to inhibit the responses of rats to peritoneal irritation–induced visceral pain and to examine the effect of gabapentin on the release of amino acids from the spinal cord.
Methods
Animal
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (weight, 300–350 g) were used for the experiments. The animals were housed individually in a temperature-controlled (21 ± 1°C) room with a 12-h light/dark cycle and were allowed free access to food and water. Surgical and experimental protocols used in this study were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Drug Preparation
Gabapentin (kindly donated by Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research, Division of Warner-Lambert Co., MI) was dissolved in saline. Drugs and vehicle solutions were made up freshly in a volume of 1 ml before each experiment. To rule out the possibility that gabapentin worked by buffering the acetic acid, the pH values of the gabapentin solutions were tested. The body weight of the rats used in the experiments ranged from 300 to 350 g. We selected six concentrations of drug solutions according to three doses of gabapentin (50, 100, and 200 mg/kg) and two body weights (300 and 350 g). The pH values of different concentrations of gabapentin for the matched dose/body weight were 6.97, 6.88, 6.87, 6.94, 7.00, and 6.99, respectively, which were comparable to the average pH of saline (6.21).
Behavioral Tests of Antinociception
Each animal was initially allowed 30 min to habituate to laboratory surroundings. The rats were then placed in individual 30 × 50 × 30–cm polypropylene boxes. All randomizations were performed by drawing lots. At least three rats were tested simultaneously. The behavioral investigator was blinded as to what drug was injected intraperitoneally.
Visceral pain was scored according to a previously reported method. 18 The acetic acid–induced writhing assay was used to determine the degree of antinociception. Nociceptive responses were characterized by the presence of abdominal contractions, which consisted of the contraction of flank muscles associated with inward movements of the hind limb, a hind paw reflex, or whole-body stretching. The rats received an intraperitoneal injection of 0.6% acetic acid (4 ml/kg) 40 min after vehicle or gabapentin (50, 100, or 200 mg/kg) administration. Abdominal contractions were recorded by visual observation of the animals for 100 min following the intraperitoneal vehicle or gabapentin treatment.
Beam-balance Task
To test for a possible central nervous system inhibitory or sedative effect, which might influence antinociceptive behavior in tests using gabapentin, the beam-balance task was used. Beam balance is sensitive to motor cortical insults. This task is used to assess gross vestibulomotor function by requiring a rat to balance steadily on a narrow beam. The beam-balance task had been used to assess sensorimotor function and motor coordination following cerebral cortical injury in rats. 19,20 The rats were placed on a wood beam (60 cm length × 1.5 cm width) for up to 60 s. The time that rats remained on the beam was recorded and compared among the groups.
Dialysate Collection and Excitatory Amino Acid Analysis
For chronic implantation of an intrathecal microdialysis fiber in the form of a loop placed in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space, the rats (weight, 300–350 g) were anesthetized with halothane, and the dialysis probe was inserted through an incision in the cisternal membrane and extended caudally until the active dialysis area (2-cm Hospal AN69, 200-μm OD, 45-kd cutoff) was placed at the level of the lumbar enlargement.
At least 4 days after recovery from implantation, rats were initially anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg intraperitoneal), and then anesthesia was maintained with 10% pentobarbital sodium administered at 20 μl/min through a tail vein. The animal's body temperature was maintained at 37°C by a servo-controlled heating blanket. The dialysis system was attached to a syringe pump and perfused with artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) at 10 μl/min. The ACSF consisted of 151.1 mm Na+, 2.6 mm K+, 0.9 mm Mg 2+, 1.3 mm Ca2+, 122.7 mm Cl, 121.0 nm HCO3, 2.5 mm HPO4, and 3.5 mm dextrose. The ACSF was bubbled with 5% CO2in 95% O2to adjust the pH to 7.2. Samples were collected in polypropylene tubes on ice and frozen at −70°C until they could be analyzed for amino acids by high-performance liquid chromatography. Animals were dialysed for 30 min to achieve equilibrium. The mean concentrations of amino acids in samples collected preceding gabapentin or saline administration were designated as baseline, and three additional samples were collected after intraperitoneal injection of gabapentin (100 mg/kg) or saline at 10-min intervals. Then, 0.6% acetic acid was injected intraperitoneally (4 ml/kg). Consecutive samples were further collected at 10-min intervals for 60 min following the acetic acid injection. Samples were assayed for several amino acids, including aspartate, glutamate, glycine, glutamine, and serine.
Data Analysis
Each treatment group consisted of 12 rats, and each rat was used for only one treatment. The total number of writhing responses for each rat during 1 h was counted. Mean numbers of abdominal contractions were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by the Dunnett t  test to compare the responses after vehicle and after each drug dose.
The average times that rats stayed on the beam 40 min after treatment with gabapentin were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by a least significant differences test to compare the effect of different doses of gabapentin on the central nervous system.
Each amino acid concentration was then expressed as a percentage of the baseline level to reduce the variation among animals. Statistical analysis of the amino acid results was performed with repeated-measures analysis of variance followed by Mann–Whitney tests. P  < 0.05 was regarded as significant.
Results
Antinociceptive Action of Gabapentin
Antinociceptive Action of Gabapentin on Writhing Responses Due to Peritoneal Irritation.
Injection of either intraperitoneal saline or gabapentin by themselves did not alter the behavior of the animals. Frequent abdominal contractions were observed 10–20 min after intraperitoneal acetic acid injection in the saline pretreatment group. Gabapentin inhibited these abdominal contractions induced by peritoneal irritation in a dose-related manner (fig. 1).
Fig. 1. Gabapentin attenuated abdominal contractions in a dose-related fashion following intraperitoneal injection of 0.6% acetic acid (mean ± SD). *P  < 0.05 versus  control group. CON = saline control; G50 = 50 mg/kg gabapentin; G100 = 100 mg/kg gabapentin; G200 = 200 mg/kg gabapentin.
Fig. 1. Gabapentin attenuated abdominal contractions in a dose-related fashion following intraperitoneal injection of 0.6% acetic acid (mean ± SD). *P 
	< 0.05 versus 
	control group. CON = saline control; G50 = 50 mg/kg gabapentin; G100 = 100 mg/kg gabapentin; G200 = 200 mg/kg gabapentin.
Fig. 1. Gabapentin attenuated abdominal contractions in a dose-related fashion following intraperitoneal injection of 0.6% acetic acid (mean ± SD). *P  < 0.05 versus  control group. CON = saline control; G50 = 50 mg/kg gabapentin; G100 = 100 mg/kg gabapentin; G200 = 200 mg/kg gabapentin.
×
Effect of Gabapentin on Beam-balance Test
Beam-balance time was significantly shortened after pretreatment with 200 mg/kg gabapentin when compared with either behavior in the absence of any treatment or after saline pretreatment (P  < 0.05;fig. 2). Mild motor ataxia was noted in all rats at this dosage. However, intraperitoneal administration of gabapentin failed to have any effect on the beam-balance test at doses of 50 or 100 mg/kg.
Fig. 2. The average time that rats stay on the beam bar 40 min after treatment with different doses of gabapentin. Systemic gabapentin, 200 mg/kg, significantly shortened the beam-balance time, P  < 0.05. Bars indicate SD. CON = saline control; G50 = 50 mg/kg gabapentin; G100 = 100 mg/kg gabapentin; G200 = 200 mg/kg gabapentin.
Fig. 2. The average time that rats stay on the beam bar 40 min after treatment with different doses of gabapentin. Systemic gabapentin, 200 mg/kg, significantly shortened the beam-balance time, P 
	< 0.05. Bars indicate SD. CON = saline control; G50 = 50 mg/kg gabapentin; G100 = 100 mg/kg gabapentin; G200 = 200 mg/kg gabapentin.
Fig. 2. The average time that rats stay on the beam bar 40 min after treatment with different doses of gabapentin. Systemic gabapentin, 200 mg/kg, significantly shortened the beam-balance time, P  < 0.05. Bars indicate SD. CON = saline control; G50 = 50 mg/kg gabapentin; G100 = 100 mg/kg gabapentin; G200 = 200 mg/kg gabapentin.
×
Reduction of Excitatory Amino Acid Release by Gabapentin
Mean basal dialysate concentrations of amino acids (mean ± SE) in the control and gabapentin groups were as follows: aspartate: 0.04 ± 0.02 versus  0.07 ± 0.02 μg/μl; glutamate: 0.23 ± 0.026 versus  0.65 ± 0.49 μg/μl; serine: 0.43 ± 0.20 versus  0.61 ± 0.26 μg/μl; glycine: 0.66 ± 0.248 versus  0.70 ± 0.32 μg/μl; glutamine: 8.91 ± 0.2 versus  7.26 ± 5.02 μg/μl.
None of the amino acid concentrations changed significantly after intraperitoneal saline or gabapentin injection. Intraperitoneal acetic acid injection produced a significant increase in spinal dialysate concentrations of aspartate (F = 4.64, P  < 0.001), glutamate (F = 3.619, P  = 0.003), and serine (F = 3.228, P  = 0.004). Dialy-sate concentrations of glycine and glutamine tended to increase, but there were no statistically significant differences (glycine: F = 1.675, P  = 0.124; glutamine: F = 0.945, P  = 0.498). The increased amino acid release induced by acetic acid alone reached a maximal level at 60 min after injection and remained unchanged for 2 h (data not shown). Pretreatment with gabapentin (100 mg/kg) significantly reduced the release of aspartate, glutamate, and serine in response to peritoneal irritation (fig. 3).
Fig. 3. Comparison of mean normalized intrathecal amino acid concentrations during 1 h between control and gabapentin groups (mean ± SE). *P  < 0.05 versus  baseline. +P  < 0.05 versus  control. Treatment: saline or gabapentin (100 mg/kg) intraperitoneal injection. AA inj = intraperitoneal injection of acetic acid; ASP = aspartate; GLU = glutamate; SER = serine; GLY = glycine; GLN = glutamine.
Fig. 3. Comparison of mean normalized intrathecal amino acid concentrations during 1 h between control and gabapentin groups (mean ± SE). *P 
	< 0.05 versus 
	baseline. +P 
	< 0.05 versus 
	control. Treatment: saline or gabapentin (100 mg/kg) intraperitoneal injection. AA inj = intraperitoneal injection of acetic acid; ASP = aspartate; GLU = glutamate; SER = serine; GLY = glycine; GLN = glutamine.
Fig. 3. Comparison of mean normalized intrathecal amino acid concentrations during 1 h between control and gabapentin groups (mean ± SE). *P  < 0.05 versus  baseline. +P  < 0.05 versus  control. Treatment: saline or gabapentin (100 mg/kg) intraperitoneal injection. AA inj = intraperitoneal injection of acetic acid; ASP = aspartate; GLU = glutamate; SER = serine; GLY = glycine; GLN = glutamine.
×
Discussion
In the current study, peritoneal irritation by acetic acid induced visceral nociceptive responses (abdominal contractions), which is in agreement with previous observations. 21 Intraperitoneal gabapentin effectively reversed these acetic acid–induced writhing responses in a dose-related fashion, even at doses that did not affect motor behavior, as determined by the beam-balance test.
Several lines of evidence have shown that excitatory amino acids, such as glutamate and aspartate, are important for the transmission of nociceptive inputs in a variety of nociceptive models, acting as direct or indirect neurotransmitters. 22–25 Profound changes may occur within the spinal cord in response to peripheral nociception or inflammation. These include changes in excitatory amino acid synthesis and release. For example, increased glutamate concentration in the spinal cord was found to correlate with noxious stimulation. 26 Acute arthritis caused a biphasic release of glutamate and aspartate in the dorsal horn. 27–29 Moreover, visceral pain caused by active labor in women induced a significantly increased concentration of the excitatory amino acid aspartate in lumbar CSF. 30 Our data clearly show, for the first time, that intraperitoneal injection of acetic acid induces an increased concentration of glutamate and aspartate in the CSF. The results indicate that injection of an irritating agent intraperitoneally activates sensory neurons sufficiently to result in an increased release of excitatory amino acid into the CSF. Therefore, activation of the sensory nervous system and release of excitatory amino acid following acetic acid injection may be considered as a part of a host defense response. Presumably, intraperitoneal gabapentin effectively reversed the acetic acid–induced writhing responses through inhibition of this increase in excitatory amino acid release.
Although hypotheses have been put forward regarding the mechanism of action of gabapentin, how gabapentin may exert its effect on spinal and peripheral neurotransmitter release is currently unclear. One mechanism is that gabapentin might decrease the synthesis of the neurotransmitter and excitotoxin glutamate. 31–33 Since intracellular Ca2+accumulation is important for the spread of epileptic discharges, 34 an effect of gabapentin on voltage-gated Ca2+channels is possible. Although gabapentin is known to bind to the α2δ subunit of voltage-dependent calcium channels, 11,35 the functional significance of this action of gabapentin appears to be controversial. By using neocortical synaptosomal preparations, which contain mostly glutamatergic terminals, Flink et al.  36 found that gabapentin reduces Ca2+influx into glutamatergic terminals, which is mainly mediated by P/Q-type voltage-gated Ca2+channels, thus inhibiting the K+-induced release of endogenous aspartate and glutamate. The inhibition of excitatory amino acid release conceivably leads to reduced postsynaptic excitability, providing one reasonable explanation for the antinociceptive efficacy of gabapentin. On the other hand, evidence shows that the antiglutamatergic properties of gabapentin are due to inhibition of cytosolic branched-chain aminotransferase, an enzyme that synthesizes glutamate in brain. 37 
In the current study, intraperitoneal acetic acid induced release not only in excitatory amino acids, but also in inhibitory amino acids, such as serine. The increased serine could be triggered by ascending transmission of nociceptive evoked activity, which in turn activates descending projection systems. The descending analgesia pathway excites inhibitory interneurons, which then release serine and glycine into the dorsal horn. The gabapentin pretreatment did not effect the concentrations of either excitatory or inhibitory amino acids. However, gabapentin significantly inhibited the acetic acid–induced serine increase.
Good clinical tolerance and a low incidence of side effects make gabapentin acceptable as a complementary analgesic by patients and physicians. In these experiments on rats, we did observe a sedative effect of gabapentin at higher doses, manifested as a shortened beam-balance time. This can be confused with analgesia.
In addition, it is not known which structures in the spinal cord are the sites of action of gabapentin. Thus, the underlying mechanisms of the inhibitory effects of gabapentin on acetic acid–evoked excitatory amino acid release need further investigation.
Conclusion
Although the mechanism of gabapentin action remains unknown, the results of this study give direct evidence in support of the hypothesis that gabapentin has an antinociceptive effect on writhing responses that follow peritoneal irritation and that this antinociceptive effect corresponds to suppression of noxious-evoked release of amino acids from the spinal cord into the CSF.
The authors thank Greg Robak for his assistance with amino acid analysis and Griselda Gonzales for assistance with the artwork (Technicians, Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas).
References
Shimoyama M, Shimoyama N, Inturrisi CE, Elliott KJ: Gabapentin enhances the antinociceptive effects of spinal morphine in the rat tail-flick test. Pain 1997; 72: 375–82Shimoyama, M Shimoyama, N Inturrisi, CE Elliott, KJ
Shimoyama N, Shimoyama M, Davis AM, Inturrisi CE, Elliott KJ: Spinal gabapentin is antinociceptive in the rat formalin test. Neurosci Lett 1997; 222: 65–7Shimoyama, N Shimoyama, M Davis, AM Inturrisi, CE Elliott, KJ
Hunter JC, Gogas KR, Hedley LR, Jacobson LO, Kassotakis L, Thompson J, Fontana DJ: The effect of novel anti-epileptic drugs in rat experimental models of acute and chronic pain. Eur J Pharmacol 1997; 324: 153–60Hunter, JC Gogas, KR Hedley, LR Jacobson, LO Kassotakis, L Thompson, J Fontana, DJ
Hwang JH, Yaksh TL: Effect of subarachnoid gabapentin on tactile-evoked allodynia in a surgically induced neuropathic pain model in the rat. Reg Anesth 1997; 22: 249–56Hwang, JH Yaksh, TL
Patel MK, Gonzalez MI, Bramwell S, Pinnock RD, Lee K: Gabapentin inhibits excitatory synaptic transmission in the hyperalgesic spinal cord. Br J Pharmacol 2000; 130: 1731–4Patel, MK Gonzalez, MI Bramwell, S Pinnock, RD Lee, K
Hemstreet B, Lapointe M: Evidence for the use of gabapentin in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Clin Ther 2001; 23: 520–31Hemstreet, B Lapointe, M
Jensen PG, Larson JR: Management of painful diabetic neuropathy. Drugs Aging 2001; 18: 737–49Jensen, PG Larson, JR
Backonja M, Beydoun A, Edwards KR, Schwartz SL, Fonseca V, Hes M, LaMoreaux L, Garofalo E: Gabapentin for the symptomatic treatment of painful neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1998; 280: 1831–6Backonja, M Beydoun, A Edwards, KR Schwartz, SL Fonseca, V Hes, M LaMoreaux, L Garofalo, E
Mellick GA, Mellick LB: Reflex sympathetic dystrophy treated with gabapentin. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 98–105Mellick, GA Mellick, LB
Rowbotham M, Harden N, Stacey B, Bernstein P, Magnus-Miller L: Gabapentin for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1998; 280: 1837–42Rowbotham, M Harden, N Stacey, B Bernstein, P Magnus-Miller, L
Suman-Chauhan N, Webdale L, Hill DR, Woodruff GN: Characterization of [3H] gabapentin binding to a novel site in rat brain: Homogenate binding studies. Eur J Pharmacol 1993; 244: 293–301Suman-Chauhan, N Webdale, L Hill, DR Woodruff, GN
Kapetanovic IM, Yonekawa WD, Kupferberg HJ: The effects of anticonvulsant compounds on 4-aminopyridine-induced de novo synthesis of neurotransmitter amino acids in rat hippocampus in vitro. Epilepsy Res 1995; 20: 113–20Kapetanovic, IM Yonekawa, WD Kupferberg, HJ
Welty DF, Schielke GP, Rothstein JD: Potential treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with gabapentin: A hypothesis. Ann Pharmacother 1995; 29: 1164–7Welty, DF Schielke, GP Rothstein, JD
Frise N, Chevalier E, Anfel F, Pascaud X, Junien JL, Dahl SG, Riviere PJ: Reversal by kappa-agonists of peritoneal irritation-induced ileus and visceral pain in rats. Life Sci 1997; 60: 625–34Frise, N Chevalier, E Anfel, F Pascaud, X Junien, JL Dahl, SG Riviere, PJ
Tracey DJ, De Biasi S, Phend K, Rustioni A: Aspartate-like immunoreactivity in primary afferent neurons. Neuroscience 1991; 40: 673–86Tracey, DJ De Biasi, S Phend, K Rustioni, A
Sasaki K, Smith CP, Chuang YC, Lee JY, Kim JC, Chancellor MB: Oral gabapentin (neurontin) treatment of refractory genitourinary tract pain. Tech Urol 2001; 7: 47–9Sasaki, K Smith, CP Chuang, YC Lee, JY Kim, JC Chancellor, MB
Hansen HC: Interstitial cystitis and the potential role of gabapentin. South Med J 2000; 93: 238–42Hansen, HC
Korster R, Anderson M, de Veer EJ: Acetic acid for analgesic screening. Fed Pro 1959; 18: 412Korster, R Anderson, M de Veer, EJ
Alexis NE, Dietrich WD, Green EJ, Prado R, Watson BD: Nonocclusive common carotid artery thrombosis in the rat results in reversible sensorimotor and cognitive behavioral deficits. Stroke 1995; 26: 2338–46Alexis, NE Dietrich, WD Green, EJ Prado, R Watson, BD
Dixon CE, Lyeth BG, Povlishock JT, Findling RL, Hamm RJ, Marmarou A, Young HF, Hayes RL: A fluid percussion model of experimental brain injury in the rat. J Neurosurg 1987; 67: 110–9Dixon, CE Lyeth, BG Povlishock, JT Findling, RL Hamm, RJ Marmarou, A Young, HF Hayes, RL
Pairet M, Ruckebusch Y: On the relevance of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the prevention of paralytic ileus in rodents. J Pharm Pharmacol 1989; 41: 757–61Pairet, M Ruckebusch, Y
Castillo J, Martinez F, Corredera E, Aldrey JM, Noya M: Amino acid transmitters in patients with headache during the acute phase of cerebrovascular ischemic disease. Stroke 1995; 26: 2035–9Castillo, J Martinez, F Corredera, E Aldrey, JM Noya, M
Dougherty PM, Willis WD: Enhancement of spinothalamic neuron responses to chemical and mechanical stimuli following combined micro-iontophoretic application of N-methyl-D-aspartic acid and substance P. Pain 1991; 47: 85–93Dougherty, PM Willis, WD
Dougherty PM, Palecek J, Paleckova V, Sorkin LS, Willis WD: The role of NMDA and non-NMDA excitatory amino acid receptor in excitation of primate spinothalamic tract neurons by mechanical, chemical, thermal, and electrical stimuli. J Neurosci 1992; 12: 3025–41Dougherty, PM Palecek, J Paleckova, V Sorkin, LS Willis, WD
Malmberg AB, Hedner T, Fallgren B, Calcutt NA: The effect of alpha-trinositol (D-myo-inositol 1,2,6-trisphosphate) on formalin-evoked spinal amino acid and prostaglandin E2 levels. Brain Res 1997; 747: 160–4Malmberg, AB Hedner, T Fallgren, B Calcutt, NA
Skilling S, Smullin HD, Beitz AJ, Latsson AA: Extracellular amino acid concentrations in the dorsal spinal cord of freely moving rats following veratridine and nociceptive stimulation. J Neurochem 1988; 51: 127–132Skilling, S Smullin, HD Beitz, AJ Latsson, AA
Sorkin LS, Westlund KN, Sluka KA, Dougherty PM, Willis WD: Neural changes in acute arthritis in monkeys: IV. Time-course of amino-acid release onto the lumbar dorsal horn. Brain Res Rev 1992; 17: 39–50Sorkin, LS Westlund, KN Sluka, KA Dougherty, PM Willis, WD
Sluka KA, Westlund KN: Behavioral and immunohistochemical changes in an experimental arthritis model in rats. Pain 1993a; 55: 367–77Sluka, KA Westlund, KN
Sluka KA, Westlund KN: Spinal-cord amino acid release and content in an arthritis model-the effects of pretreatment with non-NMDA, NMDA and NK1 receptor antagonists. Brain Res 1993; 627: 89–103Sluka, KA Westlund, KN
Olofsson C, Ekblom A, Ekman-Ordeberg G, Irestedt L, Nyberg F, Ungerstedt U, Wiklund P: Increased cerebrospinal fluid concentration of aspartate but decreased concentration of nitric oxide breakdown products in women experiencing visceral pain during active labor. Neuroreport 1997; 38: 995–8Olofsson, C Ekblom, A Ekman-Ordeberg, G Irestedt, L Nyberg, F Ungerstedt, U Wiklund, P
Goldlust A, Su TZ, Wetly DF, Taylor CP, Oxender DL: Effects of anticonvulsant drug gabapentin on the enzymes in metabolic pathways of glutamate and GABA. Epilepsy Res 1995; 22: 1–11Goldlust, A Su, TZ Wetly, DF Taylor, CP Oxender, DL
Taylor CP, Gee NS, Su TZ, Kocsis JD, Welty DF, Brown JP, Dooley DJ, Boden P, Singh L: A summary of mechanistic hypotheses of gabapentin pharmacology. Epilepsy Res 1998; 29: 233–49Taylor, CP Gee, NS Su, TZ Kocsis, JD Welty, DF Brown, JP Dooley, DJ Boden, P Singh, L
Patel S, Naeem S, Kesingland A: The effect of GABA(B) agonists and gabapentin on mechanical hyperalgesia in models of neuropathic and inflammatory pain in the rat. Pain 2001; 90: 217–26Patel, S Naeem, S Kesingland, A
Tymianski M, Tator CH: Normal and abnormal calcium homeostasis in neurons: A basis for the pathophysiology of traumatic and ischemic central nervous system injury. Neurosurgery 1996; 38: 1176–95Tymianski, M Tator, CH
Freld M, Hughes J, Singh L: Further evidence for the role of the α2δ subunit of voltage dependent calcium channels in models of neuropathic pain. Eur J Pharmacol 2000; 131: 282–6Freld, M Hughes, J Singh, L
Flink K, Meder W, Dooley JD, Githert M: Inhibition of neuronal Ca+influx by gabapentin and subsequent reduction of neurotransmitter release from rat neocortical slices. Br J Pharmacol 2000; 130: 900–6Flink, K Meder, W Dooley, JD Githert, M
Hotson SM, Berkich D, Drown P, Xu B, Aschner M, LaNoue KF: Role of Branched-chain aminotransferase isoenzymes and gabapentin in neurotransmitter metabolism. J Neurochem 1998; 71: 863–74Hotson, SM Berkich, D Drown, P Xu, B Aschner, M LaNoue, KF
Fig. 1. Gabapentin attenuated abdominal contractions in a dose-related fashion following intraperitoneal injection of 0.6% acetic acid (mean ± SD). *P  < 0.05 versus  control group. CON = saline control; G50 = 50 mg/kg gabapentin; G100 = 100 mg/kg gabapentin; G200 = 200 mg/kg gabapentin.
Fig. 1. Gabapentin attenuated abdominal contractions in a dose-related fashion following intraperitoneal injection of 0.6% acetic acid (mean ± SD). *P 
	< 0.05 versus 
	control group. CON = saline control; G50 = 50 mg/kg gabapentin; G100 = 100 mg/kg gabapentin; G200 = 200 mg/kg gabapentin.
Fig. 1. Gabapentin attenuated abdominal contractions in a dose-related fashion following intraperitoneal injection of 0.6% acetic acid (mean ± SD). *P  < 0.05 versus  control group. CON = saline control; G50 = 50 mg/kg gabapentin; G100 = 100 mg/kg gabapentin; G200 = 200 mg/kg gabapentin.
×
Fig. 2. The average time that rats stay on the beam bar 40 min after treatment with different doses of gabapentin. Systemic gabapentin, 200 mg/kg, significantly shortened the beam-balance time, P  < 0.05. Bars indicate SD. CON = saline control; G50 = 50 mg/kg gabapentin; G100 = 100 mg/kg gabapentin; G200 = 200 mg/kg gabapentin.
Fig. 2. The average time that rats stay on the beam bar 40 min after treatment with different doses of gabapentin. Systemic gabapentin, 200 mg/kg, significantly shortened the beam-balance time, P 
	< 0.05. Bars indicate SD. CON = saline control; G50 = 50 mg/kg gabapentin; G100 = 100 mg/kg gabapentin; G200 = 200 mg/kg gabapentin.
Fig. 2. The average time that rats stay on the beam bar 40 min after treatment with different doses of gabapentin. Systemic gabapentin, 200 mg/kg, significantly shortened the beam-balance time, P  < 0.05. Bars indicate SD. CON = saline control; G50 = 50 mg/kg gabapentin; G100 = 100 mg/kg gabapentin; G200 = 200 mg/kg gabapentin.
×
Fig. 3. Comparison of mean normalized intrathecal amino acid concentrations during 1 h between control and gabapentin groups (mean ± SE). *P  < 0.05 versus  baseline. +P  < 0.05 versus  control. Treatment: saline or gabapentin (100 mg/kg) intraperitoneal injection. AA inj = intraperitoneal injection of acetic acid; ASP = aspartate; GLU = glutamate; SER = serine; GLY = glycine; GLN = glutamine.
Fig. 3. Comparison of mean normalized intrathecal amino acid concentrations during 1 h between control and gabapentin groups (mean ± SE). *P 
	< 0.05 versus 
	baseline. +P 
	< 0.05 versus 
	control. Treatment: saline or gabapentin (100 mg/kg) intraperitoneal injection. AA inj = intraperitoneal injection of acetic acid; ASP = aspartate; GLU = glutamate; SER = serine; GLY = glycine; GLN = glutamine.
Fig. 3. Comparison of mean normalized intrathecal amino acid concentrations during 1 h between control and gabapentin groups (mean ± SE). *P  < 0.05 versus  baseline. +P  < 0.05 versus  control. Treatment: saline or gabapentin (100 mg/kg) intraperitoneal injection. AA inj = intraperitoneal injection of acetic acid; ASP = aspartate; GLU = glutamate; SER = serine; GLY = glycine; GLN = glutamine.
×