Free
Clinical Science  |   October 2004
Apolipoprotein E Genotype and Cognitive Dysfunction after Noncardiac Surgery
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Hanne Abildstrom, Ph.D.
    *
  • Michael Christiansen, M.D.
  • Volkert D. Siersma, M.Sc.
  • Lars S. Rasmussen, Ph.D.
    §
  • * Resident, § Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesia 4132, Center of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital. † Consultant, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Statens Serum Institute. ‡ Research Assistant, Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen. ∥ The ISPOCD2 Investigators are listed in the 1.
Article Information
Clinical Science
Clinical Science   |   October 2004
Apolipoprotein E Genotype and Cognitive Dysfunction after Noncardiac Surgery
Anesthesiology 10 2004, Vol.101, 855-861. doi:
Anesthesiology 10 2004, Vol.101, 855-861. doi:
FIRST discovered as a major determinant in lipoprotein metabolism and cardiovascular disease, apolipoprotein E (APOE) has emerged as an important molecule in several biologic processes not directly related to its lipid transport function, including Alzheimer disease and cognitive function.1 There are three different isoforms of apolipoprotein E: E2, E3, and E4 which are encoded by the alleles ε2, ε3, and ε4 of the APOE gene, respectively. The ε3 allele is the wild type and is present in 75% of the native European population2; ε2 (8%) and ε4 (17%) are less frequent. The ε4 allele is associated with increased risk for atherosclerosis3 and Alzheimer disease,4–6 reduced neurite outgrowth,7 and poor prognosis after cerebral injury.8,9 There are data to indicate that presence of the ε4 allele may predict accelerated cognitive decline within a normal aging population.10,11 However, the mechanism for this association is not clear because the ε4 allele predisposes to cerebrovascular disease and atherosclerosis of the aorta and carotid arteries,3 which also accounts for considerable cognitive impairment.12 An association between the ε4 allele and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) after cardiac surgery has been suggested by Tardiff et al.  ,13 but the literature is conflicting because Steed et al.  14 did not confirm this relation.
Postoperative cognitive dysfunction is also a common complication after noncardiac surgery, with the incidence increasing with older age.15,16 A multicenter study of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery was conducted as a part of the Second International Study of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction (ISPOCD2). We hypothesized that patients carrying the ε4 allele would have a greater risk of POCD than noncarriers.
Materials and Methods
After approval from the local ethics committees (see “Data Collection Centers” in 1for locations of ethics committees) was obtained, a total of 976 patients were enrolled in 14 centers in 8 different countries after giving written informed consent. Blood samples were drawn from patients recruited for the three studies comprising the ISPOCD2 study: patients aged 60 yr and older undergoing minor surgery (< 1 h) with general anesthesia as inpatients or outpatients according to local practice (maximal hospital stay of 2 days),17 patients aged 60 yr and older undergoing major surgery (> 1 h) and randomized for either general or regional anesthesia,18 and patients aged 40–59 yr undergoing major surgery (> 1 h) with general anesthesia.19 Patients scheduled to undergo cardiac surgery or neurosurgery were not eligible. Therefore, all patients were aged 40 yr or older and scheduled to undergo surgery with either general or regional anesthesia. The type and conduct of general anesthesia conformed to the usual institution practice, and apart from ensuring normocapnia, there were no restrictions. Some patients had a supplementary epidural for both perioperative and postoperative analgesia on the decision of the anesthesiologist in charge. Patients receiving epidural or spinal anesthesia during surgery were allowed sedation with propofol at a level compatible with prompt arousal to a verbal stimulus.
Exclusion criteria were daily use of major tranquilizers or antipsychotic medication, or extensive use of alcohol (> 5 U/day). We also excluded patients with known disease of the central nervous system (such as psychiatric, degenerative or metabolic disease, infection, tumor, earlier severe head trauma or parkinsonism) or a score of less than 24 of 30 points on the Mini-Mental State Examination.20 A full medical history was recorded, including all medications given and complications occurring during admission. At the 3-month follow-up, new medications and complications were also recorded.
APOE Genotyping
A blood sample was drawn into an evacuated tube containing K2-EDTA. Three samples each of approximately 50 μl were dropped onto filter paper (Marcherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) and air-dried. The filter papers were refrigerated until shipment to Statens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark, where they were stored at −20°C until analysis. DNA was extracted from filter paper using the QIAamp Minikit (QIAGEN GMBH, Hilden, Germany) as recommended by the manufacturer. An APOE fragment of 231 base pairs was amplified from purified genomic DNA by polymerized chain reaction using the primers APOE FWD (5′-GCGGGCACGGCTGTCCAAG-3′) and APOE REV (5′-GCCCCGGCCTGGTACACTGC-3′). The polymerized chain reaction conditions were 94°C for 4 min followed by 38 cycles of 94°C for 20 s, 65°C for 20 s, and 72°C for 40 s, ending with a 7-min extension at 72°C. Genotyping was performed by means of combined Hae  II and Afl  III enzyme digestion followed by separation on a 3% Metaphor agarose (Medinova, Glostrup, Denmark).21 The APOE alleles ε2, ε3, and ε4 were discernible by the appearance of fragments of the sizes 168, 145, and 195 base pairs, respectively.
Each patient was given a patient code at the local study center at enrollment. Blinding of APOE genotype was obtained because the identity of the individual patient was not known at the central laboratory analyzing blood samples or at the data analysis center.
Neuropsychological Testing
The patients underwent neuropsychological testing using the ISPOCD Test Battery15 comprising seven subtests at three occasions: preoperatively and approximately 1 week and 3 months after surgery.
Statistical Analysis
Assuming an incidence of POCD of 20% at 1 week after surgery in patients with the ε4 allele and 10% in noncarriers, a sample size of 700 patients was required, accepting a type 1 error of 5% and a power of 95%. SAS software (Cary, NC) was used for data analysis. A P  value below 5% was considered statistically significant. In the text, population average values are reported as medians with 5–95% range and population proportions as percentages with 95% confidence intervals.
Normative neuropsychological data were available for each of the two age groups, 40–59 yr19 and 60 yr and older.15 The controls were age-matched healthy individuals not staying in the hospital or undergoing surgery in the study period. They were recruited as spouses of patients or by advertisements in local papers. We analyzed test results of 352 controls tested using the same test battery at the same intervals. The mean changes were taken as estimated learning effects. We calculated the change in test results from the preoperative baseline value for patients and expressed the differences as Z scores for each by comparison with the control population. The Z score is therefore a continuous parameter describing the number of SDs that the change in test results of the individual patient is from the mean change of the normative data. By adding the subtest Z scores, a combined Z score was calculated, a measure of change in overall test performance of the patient at the postoperative test session. We defined POCD as a combined Z score greater than 1.96 or a Z score greater than 1.96 in at least two of the seven subtests.15 If patients refused or were not able to complete a specific test, the Z score for that test was considered 0.
Baseline test results between patients with and without the ε4 allele were compared to investigate whether patients with the ε4 allele had poorer performance at baseline.
The variables of interest were the dichotomous POCD indicators (yes/no) at the two postoperative test sessions. APOE genotype, age, sex, and education level were used as covariates, and additional risk factors were identified in the three ISPOCD2 studies: alcohol, epidural, hospitalization, type of surgery, duration of anesthesia, and center.17–19 
In a univariate analysis, APOE genotype was classified in two ways: a gene-dosage effect was tested by a division into three groups—0, 1, and 2 ε4 alleles—and an overall effect was tested by a division into two groups—presence of the ε4 allele (yes/no). The latter, dichotomous, classification of APOE genotype was used in a multivariate logistic regression model to assess the influence of the APOE genotype on POCD in the presence of the other covariates. The prevalence of the ε4 allele is known to vary in different populations2 and with age,22 and a significant interaction with education was found in a similar study.13 Therefore, the significance of the effect of APOE genotype and of the other covariates was assessed in a model that included interactions between APOE genotype and center, age, and education, respectively. An indication of effect size was based on a similar multivariate logistic regression model but without the interactions.
A protective effect of the ε2 allele on cognitive function has been demonstrated.23 To take this possible interference into account, analysis of the influence of the APOE genotype on POCD was done in two ways. First, carriers of the ε2 allele were eliminated from the multivariate logistic regression analysis (without interactions), and second, an effect of the ε2 allele was specifically allowed by adding it to the covariate list in the multivariate logistic regression analysis (without interactions).
Supplementary data analyses were performed to avoid overlooking a significant association between APOE genotype and POCD due to the chosen cutoff level or cognitive decline in specific cognitive domains. For this purpose, multivariate linear regression models containing the covariates listed above (but not the interactions) were fitted to the continuous score variables, i.e.  , the combined Z score and the seven separate subtest Z scores. Multiple testing decreases the significance level in this analysis to a P  value of less than 0.006 through a Bonferroni correction.
Results
One hundred eighty-three controls (133 women and 50 men) were included in the group aged between 40 and 60 yr, with a median age of 51 (41–59) yr,19 and 176 controls (75 women and 101 men) were included in the group aged 60 yr and older, with a median age of 67 (61–81) yr.15 
A total of 976 patients with a median age of 65 (43–80) yr were included in the study. The median duration of anesthesia was 113 (25–255) min. The median duration of hospital stay was 4 (0–16) days. Other characteristics are given in table 1: Patients from the Mediterranean centers had a lesser prevalence of the ε4 allele. The distribution of patients with the six different genotypes is shown in table 2and gave the following allele frequencies ε2: 7.9%; ε3: 75.1%; ε4: 17.0%.
Table 1. Patient Characteristics 
Image not available
Table 1. Patient Characteristics 
×
Table 2. Distribution of Patients with the Six Different APOE Genotypes (N = 976) 
Image not available
Table 2. Distribution of Patients with the Six Different APOE Genotypes (N = 976) 
×
Neuropsychological data were obtained at the first postoperative test session for 895 patients and at 3 months’ follow-up for 842 patients. Infectious, respiratory, and cardiovascular complications and cases in which second surgery was needed were few in the study period. Accordingly, postoperative complications were not included in the risk factor analysis.
Neuropsychological Test Results
At the preoperative test session, we found no difference in baseline test results between patients with or without the ε4 allele (table 3). The first postoperative test session was completed by 895 patients after a median of 7 (2–17) days, and 93 had POCD, corresponding to an incidence of 10.4% (8.5–12.3%). At the second postoperative test session, after a median of 99 (77–160) days, 75 of 842 patients had POCD, i.e.  , an incidence of 8.9% (7.0–10.8%). In the control group 13 of 352 controls, i.e.  , 3.7% (2.7–4.7%), fulfilled the criteria of cognitive dysfunction after 1 week, and 12 of 345 controls fulfilled the criteria of cognitive dysfunction after 3 months, corresponding to an incidence of 3.5% (2.6–4.4%). Accordingly, the incidence of POCD among patients was significantly higher than among controls (P  < 0.001 for both 1 week and 3 months).
Table 3. Comparison of Baseline Test Results between Patients (median [range 5–95%]) 
Image not available
Table 3. Comparison of Baseline Test Results between Patients (median [range 5–95%]) 
×
The number of patients completing both postoperative test sessions was 840, and of those, 18 had POCD at both test sessions. POCD 1 week after surgery was found in an additional 69 patients who recovered 3 months later. On the other hand, 57 patients who did not exhibit early POCD fulfilled the criteria 3 months postoperatively.
In the univariate analysis (table 4), presence of the ε4 allele was not a significant risk factor for POCD after 1 week or after 3 months. Few patients were homozygous for the ε4 allele, so we were unable to assess a possible gene-dosage effect on POCD. Results from the multivariate logistic regression model for POCD after 1 week are given in table 5; age, duration of anesthesia, and avoidance of alcohol were significant risk factors for POCD 1 week after surgery. At the 3-month test session (table 6), no significant risk factors were identified. Presence of the ε4 allele was not a significant risk factor at 1 week or 3 months. There were no significant interactions.
Table 4. Proportion of Patients with Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction (POCD) at 1 Week and 3 Months by Risk Factors (Chi-square) 
Image not available
Table 4. Proportion of Patients with Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction (POCD) at 1 Week and 3 Months by Risk Factors (Chi-square) 
×
Table 5. Analysis of Risk Factors in Relation to the First Postoperative Test Session (n = 895) 
Image not available
Table 5. Analysis of Risk Factors in Relation to the First Postoperative Test Session (n = 895) 
×
Table 6. Analysis of Risk Factors in Relation to the Second Postoperative Test Session (n = 842) 
Image not available
Table 6. Analysis of Risk Factors in Relation to the Second Postoperative Test Session (n = 842) 
×
An additional multivariate logistic regression analysis was repeated after omitting carriers of the ε2 allele to avoid interference of the presumably protective effect of this allele. The ε4 allele was still not a risk factor for POCD at 1 week (P  = 0.38) or 3 months (P  = 0.91). In the analysis of the ε2 allele as a protective factor, no statistical significance was found in the full model of multivariate logistic regression of POCD after 1 week (P  = 0.44) or POCD after 3 months (P  = 0.34). Presence of the ε4 allele was not a predictor of cognitive decline in any of the seven separate subtests or the overall test performance of test results at the test session after 1 week or 3 months (P  > 0.02 with significance level 0.006 in this supplementary analysis).
Discussion
This study investigated a possible genetic predisposition to POCD after noncardiac surgery. We found no statistically significant association between APOE genotype and POCD at 1 week or 3 months after noncardiac surgery, but low statistical power could be an important limitation. Logistic regression analysis identified age, duration of anesthesia, and avoidance of alcohol as risk factors for POCD after 1 week. Three months later, no significant risk factors were found.
The frequencies and distribution of genotypes found in this study population corresponds well to previous reports (table 2), and a lesser prevalence of the ε4 allele in Mediterranean countries compared to Northern Europe is well known.2 We did not analyze APOE genotype among controls, but the patients with the ε4 allele did not have a poorer baseline performance (table 3) than the rest of the study population. If that had been the case, floor effects could have impaired the detection of decline among patients with the ε4 allele.24 
The incidence of POCD 1 week after surgery was only 10.4%, which is less than in the ISPOCD1 study,15 where an incidence of 25.8% was found among elderly patients undergoing major surgery with general anesthesia. However, in the current study, the median age of the population was lower, perioperative complications were few, and some patients had only minor surgery with short hospital stay if any, all conditions associated with a lower incidence of POCD.17,19 
After 3 months, the incidence of POCD was 8.9%, which is comparable to that of the ISPOCD1 study (9.9%).15 During the 3 months after surgery, the incidence of POCD did not change significantly in this study in contrast to the ISPOCD1 study.15 Early POCD after major surgery might mainly be due to residual drug effects and complications that depress cognitive function shortly after surgery, where the etiology of long-term POCD might be different. The patients with POCD after 3 months did not all exhibit POCD at the test session after 1 week; only 18 patients had POCD at both postoperative test sessions. First, patients who were not fit enough for testing after 1 week were not registered as having POCD at this time point. Patients withdrawing from studies are known to have lower baseline test results18 and may be most likely to experience cognitive decline. This leads to an underestimation of the incidence of early POCD. Second, it is known from similar studies of cardiac25,26 and noncardiac surgery27 that there is a discrepancy between results from repeated test sessions. Some patients may be able to compensate for a period of time and then relapse into the group of patients fulfilling the criteria of POCD.
Patients with the ε4 allele were observed to have a 20% greater risk of POCD than noncarriers in the univariate analysis, but we assumed a 100% higher risk as the basis of our sample size calculation. To detect a true difference between 9.9% and 11.7%, at least 10,000 patients would be required. On one hand, the ε4 allele would, accordingly, not be a major risk factor for POCD. On the other hand, it could be argued that in general, a 20% difference in an outcome associated with potential substantial decrease in quality of life would have a clinical significance. The clinical impact of POCD is difficult to assess, but we have previously demonstrated a significant correlation between a decline in the activities of daily living and POCD after 3 months.15,19 Maybe the sample size defined should be assessed within the confines of other interventions within the population. As an example, antiplatelet treatment reduced vascular mortality by 15% and nonfatal vascular events by 30% in a meta-analysis of a total of 29,000 patients.28 Also, it should be noted that, had the incidence of early POCD been as high as in the ISPOCD1 study15 (25.8%) and given a 20% risk reduction determined by APOE genotype, only a sample size of 3,500 would be needed. Hence, the importance of APOE genotype could be demonstrated in fewer patients by studying a high-risk population.
The methodology is comparable to previous studies on cognitive decline and APOE genotype.10,11 Some population-based studies have found an association between decline in specific cognitive domains such as memory functions29,30 and APOE genotype. When evaluating a broad measure of cognitive performance, whether it is a dichotomous or a continuously dependent variable, such a specific impairment might be overlooked. Hence, we also assessed changes in performance in each of the seven subtests constituting the ISPOCD Test Battery but found no relation between decline in a specific cognitive domain and APOE genotype.
Tardiff et al.  13 studied 65 patients undergoing cardiac bypass grafting. They used a less rigorous definition of POCD and found a significant association between the ε4 allele and decline in short-term memory 6 weeks after surgery. However, there was a significant interaction between APOE genotype and education level. They regarded their results as preliminary due to the small sample size that permitted the analysis of only a few covariates. Steed et al.  14 aimed to replicate this work with a sample size of 111 patients but found no association between the ε4 allele and cognitive decline. Moreover, this was a secondary analysis of pooled data from a negative drug trial aimed at reducing neurologic injury after cardiac surgery, and a possible interaction between the neuroprotective drug and the ε4 allele was not evaluated. So far, the literature is conflicting regarding importance of APOE genotype on POCD after cardiac surgery.
The etiology of POCD is unknown, but the high incidence after cardiac surgery has been attributed to the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. More recently, studies on cognitive functioning after on-pump versus  off-pump surgery have been published. Conclusions conflict with some studies reporting a significantly lower incidence of POCD among patients in the off-pump technique group,31 and others find no difference.32 During cardiopulmonary bypass, embolic events combined with periods of cerebral hypoperfusion do occur.33,34 Even though emboli may also occur during major joint replacement, patients undergoing noncardiac surgery do not face the same risks of potentially damaging incidents. Accordingly, other mechanisms may be responsible, and therefore, APOE genotype might be connected with POCD after on-pump cardiac surgery but not after noncardiac surgery. APOE genotype may determine outcome only after the specific neuronal damage of cardiac surgery during cardiopulmonary bypass.
Some of the risk factors identified in this study at the test session 1 week after surgery, such as age, and duration of anesthesia are the same as those found in the ISPOCD1 study.15 Complications in the perioperative period were few in the current study, so these were not entered as covariates in further analyses. The greater incidence of POCD in patients who avoided alcohol could be explained if patients who use alcohol regularly are less sensitive to anesthetics. It could be speculated also that patients who never drink alcohol might have different genetic, social, educational, or environmental backgrounds making them more susceptible to POCD.
In this study, age failed to reach the level of significance (P  = 0.17) at the second postoperative test session. In the ISPOCD1 study,15 age was the only identified risk factor after 3 months. The hypothesis that APOE genotype would add to in the explanation of prolonged POCD could not be supported in this study. The mechanisms behind POCD must still be elucidated to provide additional information regarding this serious complication to surgery.
In conclusion, we were not able to show a significant association between APOE genotype and POCD after noncardiac surgery. It must be taken into consideration that the sample size of the study did not allow a firm conclusion because of a lower incidence of POCD than expected.
References
Mahley RW, Rall SC: Apolipoprotein E: Far more than a lipid transport protein. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2000; 1:507–37Mahley, RW Rall, SC
Gerdes LU, Klausen IC, Sihm I, Faergeman O: Apolipoprotein E polymorphism in a Danish population compared to findings in 45 other study populations around the world. Genet Epidemiol 1992; 9:155–67Gerdes, LU Klausen, IC Sihm, I Faergeman, O
Davignon J, Gregg RE, Sing CF: Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis 1988; 8:1–21Davignon, J Gregg, RE Sing, CF
Corder EH, Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel DE, Gaskell PC, Small GW, Roses AD, Haines JL, Pericak-Vance MA: Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in late onset families. Science 1993; 261:921–3Corder, EH Saunders, AM Strittmatter, WJ Schmechel, DE Gaskell, PC Small, GW Roses, AD Haines, JL Pericak-Vance, MA
Poirier J, Davignon J, Bouthillier D, Kogan S, Bertrand P, Gauthier S: Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 1993; 342:697–9Poirier, J Davignon, J Bouthillier, D Kogan, S Bertrand, P Gauthier, S
Strittmatter WJ, Saunders AM, Schmechel D, Pericak-Vance M, Enghild J, Salvesen GS, Roses AD: Apolipoprotein E: high-avidity binding to β-amyloid and increased frequency of type 4 allele in late-onset familial Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993; 90:1977–81Strittmatter, WJ Saunders, AM Schmechel, D Pericak-Vance, M Enghild, J Salvesen, GS Roses, AD
Nathan BP, Bellosta S, Sanan DA, Weisgraber KH, Mahley RW, Pitas RE: Differential effects of apolipoproteins E3 and E4 on neuronal growth in vitro. Science 1994; 264:850–2Nathan, BP Bellosta, S Sanan, DA Weisgraber, KH Mahley, RW Pitas, RE
Nicoll JA, Roberts GW, Graham DI: Apolipoprotein E ε4 allele is associated with deposition of amyloid β-protein following head injury. Nat Med 1995; 1:135–7Nicoll, JA Roberts, GW Graham, DI
Teasdale GM, Nicoll JA, Murray G, Fiddes M: Association of apolipoprotein E polymorphism with outcome after head injury. Lancet 1997; 350:1069–71Teasdale, GM Nicoll, JA Murray, G Fiddes, M
Feskens EJ, Havekes LM, Kalmijn S, de Knijff P, Launer LJ, Kromhout D: Apolipoprotein e4 allele and cognitive decline in elderly men. BMJ 1994; 309:1202–6Feskens, EJ Havekes, LM Kalmijn, S de Knijff, P Launer, LJ Kromhout, D
Henderson AS, Easteal S, Jorm AF, Mackinnon AJ, Korten AE, Christensen H, Croft L, Jacomb PA: Apolipoprotein E allele ε4, dementia, and cognitive decline in a population sample. Lancet 1995; 346:1387–90Henderson, AS Easteal, S Jorm, AF Mackinnon, AJ Korten, AE Christensen, H Croft, L Jacomb, PA
Breteler MM, Claus JJ, Grobbee DE, Hofman A: Cardiovascular disease and distribution of cognitive function in elderly people: The Rotterdam Study. BMJ 1994; 308:1604–8Breteler, MM Claus, JJ Grobbee, DE Hofman, A
Tardiff BE, Newman MF, Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Blumenthal JA, White WD, Croughwell ND, Davis RD, Roses AD, Reves JG, Neurologic Outcome Research Group of the Duke Heart Center: Preliminary report of a genetic basis for cognitive decline after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64:715–20Tardiff, BE Newman, MF Saunders, AM Strittmatter, WJ Blumenthal, JA White, WD Croughwell, ND Davis, RD Roses, AD Reves, JG Neurologic Outcome Research Group of the Duke Heart Center,
Steed L, Kong R, Stygall J, Acharya J, Bolla M, Harrison MJ, Humphries SE, Newman SP: The role of apolipoprotein E in cognitive decline after cardiac operation. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71:823–6Steed, L Kong, R Stygall, J Acharya, J Bolla, M Harrison, MJ Humphries, SE Newman, SP
Moller JT, Cluitmans P, Rasmussen LS, Houx P, Rasmussen H, Canet J, Rabbitt P, Jolles J, Larsen K, Hanning CD, Langeron O, Johnson T, Lauven PM, Kristensen PA, Biedler A, van Beem H, Fraidakis O, Silverstein JH, Beneken JE, Gravenstein JS, for the ISPOCD Investigators: Long-term postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly: ISPOCD1 study. Lancet 1998; 351:857–61Moller, JT Cluitmans, P Rasmussen, LS Houx, P Rasmussen, H Canet, J Rabbitt, P Jolles, J Larsen, K Hanning, CD Langeron, O Johnson, T Lauven, PM Kristensen, PA Biedler, A van Beem, H Fraidakis, O Silverstein, JH Beneken, JE Gravenstein, JS the ISPOCD Investigators,
Williams-Russo P, Sharrock NE, Mattis S, Szatrowski TP, Charlson ME: Cognitive effects after epidural vs general anesthesia in older adults: A randomized trial. JAMA 1995; 274:44–50Williams-Russo, P Sharrock, NE Mattis, S Szatrowski, TP Charlson, ME
Canet J, Raeder J, Rasmussen LS, Enlund M, Kuipers HM, Hanning CD, Jolles J, Korttila K, Siersma VD, Dodds C, Abildstrom H, Sneyd JR, Vila P, Johnson T, Munoz Corsini L, Silverstein JH, Nielsen IK, Moller JT, for the ISPOCD2 Investigators: Cognitive dysfunction after minor surgery in the elderly. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47:1204–10Canet, J Raeder, J Rasmussen, LS Enlund, M Kuipers, HM Hanning, CD Jolles, J Korttila, K Siersma, VD Dodds, C Abildstrom, H Sneyd, JR Vila, P Johnson, T Munoz Corsini, L Silverstein, JH Nielsen, IK Moller, JT the ISPOCD2 Investigators,
Rasmussen LS, Johnson T, Kuipers HM, Kristensen D, Siersma VD, Vila P, Jolles J, Papaioannou A, Abildstrom H, Silverstein JH, Bonal JA, Raeder J, Nielsen IK, Korttila K, Munoz L, Dodds C, Hanning CD, Moller JT, for the ISPOCD2 Investigators: Does anaesthesia cause postoperative cognitive dysfunction? A randomized study of regional versus general anaesthesia in 438 elderly patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47:260–6Rasmussen, LS Johnson, T Kuipers, HM Kristensen, D Siersma, VD Vila, P Jolles, J Papaioannou, A Abildstrom, H Silverstein, JH Bonal, JA Raeder, J Nielsen, IK Korttila, K Munoz, L Dodds, C Hanning, CD Moller, JT the ISPOCD2 Investigators,
Johnson T, Monk T, Rasmussen LS, Abildstrom H, Houx P, Korttila K, Kuipers HM, Hanning CD, Siersma VD, Kristensen D, Canet J, Ibanaz MT, Moller JT, for the ISPOCD2 Investigators: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction in middle-aged patients. Anesthesiology 2002; 96:1351–7Johnson, T Monk, T Rasmussen, LS Abildstrom, H Houx, P Korttila, K Kuipers, HM Hanning, CD Siersma, VD Kristensen, D Canet, J Ibanaz, MT Moller, JT the ISPOCD2 Investigators,
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiat Res 1975; 12:189–98Folstein, MF Folstein, SE McHugh, PR
Zivelin A, Rosenberg N, Peretz H, Amit Y, Kornbrot N, Seligsohn U: Improved method for genotyping apolipoprotein E polymorphisms by a PCR-based assay simultaneously utilizing two distinct restriction enzymes. Clin Chem 1997; 43:1657–9Zivelin, A Rosenberg, N Peretz, H Amit, Y Kornbrot, N Seligsohn, U
Schachter F, Faure-Delanef L, Guenot F, Rouger H, Froguel P, Lesueur-Ginot L, Cohen D: Genetic associations with human longevity at the APOE and ACE loci. Nat Genet 1994; 6:29–32Schachter, F Faure-Delanef, L Guenot, F Rouger, H Froguel, P Lesueur-Ginot, L Cohen, D
Corder EH, Saunders AM, Risch NJ, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel DE, Gaskell-PC, Rimmler JB, Locke PA, Conneally PM, Schmader KE, Small GW, Roses AD, Haines JL, Pericak-Vance MA: Protective effect of apolipoprotein E type 2 allele for late onset Alzheimer disease. Nat Genet 1994; 7:180–4Corder, EH Saunders, AM Risch, NJ Strittmatter, WJ Schmechel, DE Gaskell-PC Rimmler, JB Locke, PA Conneally, PM Schmader, KE Small, GW Roses, AD Haines, JL Pericak-Vance, MA
Rasmussen LS, Larsen K, Houx P, Skovgaard LT, Hanning CD, Moller JT, the ISPOCD Group: The assessment of postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45:275–89Rasmussen, LS Larsen, K Houx, P Skovgaard, LT Hanning, CD Moller, JT the ISPOCD Group,
Savageau JA, Stanton BA, Jenkins CD, Frater RW: Neuropsychological dysfunction following elective cardiac operation: II. A six-month reassessment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982; 84:595–600Savageau, JA Stanton, BA Jenkins, CD Frater, RW
Newman MF, Kirchner JL, Phillips-Bute B, Gaver V, Grocott H, Jones RH, Mark DB, Reves JG, Blumenthal JA: Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:395–402Newman, MF Kirchner, JL Phillips-Bute, B Gaver, V Grocott, H Jones, RH Mark, DB Reves, JG Blumenthal, JA
Abildstrom H, Rasmussen LS, Rentowl P, Hanning CD, Rasmussen H, Kristensen PA, Moller JT, the ISPOCD Group: Cognitive dysfunction 1-2 years after non-cardiac surgery in the elderly. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000; 44:1246–51Abildstrom, H Rasmussen, LS Rentowl, P Hanning, CD Rasmussen, H Kristensen, PA Moller, JT the ISPOCD Group,
Antiplatelet Trialists’ Collaboration: Secondary prevention of vascular disease by prolonged antiplatelet treatment. BMJ 1988; 296:320–31Antiplatelet Trialists’ Collaboration,
Flory JD, Manuck SB, Ferrell RE, Ryan CM, Muldoon MF: Memory performance and the apolipoprotein E polymorphism in a community sample of middle-aged adults. Am J Med Genet 2000; 96:707–11Flory, JD Manuck, SB Ferrell, RE Ryan, CM Muldoon, MF
O’Hara R, Yesavage JA, Kraemer HC, Mauricio M, Friedman LF, Murphy GM: The APOE ε4 allele is associated with decline on delayed recall performance in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998; 46:1493–8O’Hara, R Yesavage, JA Kraemer, HC Mauricio, M Friedman, LF Murphy, GM
Zamvar V, Williams D, Hall J, Payne N, Cann C, Young K, Karthikeyan S, Dunne J: Assessment of neurocognitive impairment after off-pump and on-pump techniques for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Prospective randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2002; 325:1268–72Zamvar, V Williams, D Hall, J Payne, N Cann, C Young, K Karthikeyan, S Dunne, J
Van Dijk D, Jansen EW, Hijman R, Nierich AP, Diephuis JC, Moon KG, Lahpor JR, Borst C, Keizer AM, Nathoe HM, Grobbee DE, De Jaegere PP, Kalkman CJ, for the Octopus Study Group: Cognitive outcome after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A randomized trial. JAMA 2002; 287:1405–12Van Dijk, D Jansen, EW Hijman, R Nierich, AP Diephuis, JC Moon, KG Lahpor, JR Borst, C Keizer, AM Nathoe, HM Grobbee, DE De Jaegere, PP Kalkman, CJ the Octopus Study Group,
Blauth C, Arnold J, Kohner EM, Taylor KM: Retinal microembolism during cardiopulmonary bypass demonstrated by fluorescein angiography. Lancet 1986; 2:837–9Blauth, C Arnold, J Kohner, EM Taylor, KM
Pugsley W, Klinger L, Paschalis C, Treasure T, Harrison M, Newman S: The impact of microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass on neuropsychological functioning. Stroke 1994; 25:1393–9Pugsley, W Klinger, L Paschalis, C Treasure, T Harrison, M Newman, S
Appendix: ISPOCD2 (International Study of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction) Investigators
Data Collection Centers
Jakob T. Moller, D.M.Sc., Chair, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Chris D. Hanning, F.R.C.A., Consultant, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom; Kari Korttila, Ph.D., Professor, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Bergsvein Grimsmo, R.N., Research Nurse, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Diana Kristensen, M.D., Research Fellow, Hillerød Hospital, Hillerod, Denmark; Pere Vila, M.D., Consultant, Hospital Universitari “Germans Trias i Pujol,” Barcelona, Spain; Mats Enlund, Ph.D., Associate Professor, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden; Tim Johnson, F.R.C.A., Consultant, Hope Hospital, Salford, United Kingdom; José A. Bonal, M.D., Consultant, Hospital General, Universitario de Elche, Alicante, Spain; Fotini Haniotaki, M.D., Consultant, University Hospital of Iraklion, Crete, Greece; Inge K. Nielsen, M.D., Research Fellow, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Jeffrey Silverstein, M.D., Consultant, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York; J. Robert Sneyd, M.D., Professor, Peninsula Medical School, Plymouth, United Kingdom; Lourdes M. Corsini, M.D., Consultant, Fundacion Hospital Alcorcon, Madrid, Spain
Data Management Center
Harrie M. Kuipers, Technician, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Neuropsychological Test Battery
Peter Houx, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Maastricht Brain and Behavior Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Table 1. Patient Characteristics 
Image not available
Table 1. Patient Characteristics 
×
Table 2. Distribution of Patients with the Six Different APOE Genotypes (N = 976) 
Image not available
Table 2. Distribution of Patients with the Six Different APOE Genotypes (N = 976) 
×
Table 3. Comparison of Baseline Test Results between Patients (median [range 5–95%]) 
Image not available
Table 3. Comparison of Baseline Test Results between Patients (median [range 5–95%]) 
×
Table 4. Proportion of Patients with Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction (POCD) at 1 Week and 3 Months by Risk Factors (Chi-square) 
Image not available
Table 4. Proportion of Patients with Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction (POCD) at 1 Week and 3 Months by Risk Factors (Chi-square) 
×
Table 5. Analysis of Risk Factors in Relation to the First Postoperative Test Session (n = 895) 
Image not available
Table 5. Analysis of Risk Factors in Relation to the First Postoperative Test Session (n = 895) 
×
Table 6. Analysis of Risk Factors in Relation to the Second Postoperative Test Session (n = 842) 
Image not available
Table 6. Analysis of Risk Factors in Relation to the Second Postoperative Test Session (n = 842) 
×