Free
Correspondence  |   March 2005
Cardioprotective Properties of Sevoflurane in Patients Undergoing Coronary Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass Are Related to the Modalities of Its Administration
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Alimorad G. Djalali, M.D.
    *
  • * Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Article Information
Correspondence
Correspondence   |   March 2005
Cardioprotective Properties of Sevoflurane in Patients Undergoing Coronary Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass Are Related to the Modalities of Its Administration
Anesthesiology 3 2005, Vol.102, 699-700. doi:
Anesthesiology 3 2005, Vol.102, 699-700. doi:
To the Editor:—
We read with interest the article by De Hert et al.  1 in which the cardioprotective properties of sevoflurane were investigated. A well-designed study by Conzen et al.  ,2 published in 2003, investigating off-pump procedures, came to similar conclusions. Troponin I was the marker of myocardial damage in this study. It is well established that troponin is a specific marker of myocardial injury and a risk predictor, especially in patients with acute coronary disease without ST-segment elevation.3 However, there are other causes of troponin increases, such as acute pericarditis, myocarditis, renal failure, acute pulmonary emboli, sepsis, congestive heart failure, tachycardia, heavy exercise, and heterophilic antibodies.4,5 Measurable troponin concentrations may also occur after procedures such as coronary angioplasty, electrophysiologic ablation, and cardioversion. Furthermore, the relevance of troponin and its correlation to the magnitude of myocardial injury after cardiac surgery has not been validated. Only in an animal model has such a correlation been established.6 Although some studies, such as that of Fellahi et al.  ,7 have demonstrated that patients with a high concentration of troponin I have an increased risk of death postoperatively, it is not clear that the troponin concentration differences in this study correlate with clinical outcome. It is also not clear that these differences in the context of a multidrug regimen are due to sevoflurane alone. Propofol was used in all groups for induction of anesthesia and continued postoperatively, weakening the cause-and-effect relation.
Substantial efforts were made by the investigators to demonstrate the effect of sevoflurane as a function of the duration of its use. Unfortunately, sevoflurane concentrations varied between 0.5 and 2.5% (not mentioned if related to minimum alveolar concentration, vapor setting, or expiratory concentration) according to the Bispectral Index. Because other medications, temperature, ventilation, and age have effects on the Bispectral Index, a large variation in the partial pressure of sevoflurane among the subjects might have resulted, making an estimate of dose dependency impossible. In addition, as acknowledged by the investigators, troponin differences among the sevoflurane groups were not significant; therefore, a conclusion that effects of sevoflurane were most clinically apparent in the “SEVO all” group is not statistically supported because the sevoflurane groups are not different from one another.
With a half-life of 7–9 days, troponin remains in the circulation for a long time. Consequently, one would assume that when the concentrations have reached a peak, they would remain high, making the repeated sampling unnecessary and even confusing.
Troponin measurements are a sensitive and expensive marker whose utility is to establish whether myocardial injury is present. The value of multiple sampling used in this study is unclear and needs validation.
In this study, troponin concentrations may have been influenced by the extent of the surgical manipulation. Distribution of the individual surgeons among the patient groups would be valuable for the interpretation of the results. Furthermore, localization of the bypassed vessels would give useful insight into whether the procedures were comparable.2 The significance of troponin increases in patients with abnormal renal function is an important and still-debated issue.8,9 Although the study excluded patients with a baseline creatinine concentration of greater than 1.5 mg/dl, it is well known that renal injury can occur during cardiopulmonary bypass; no information is presented on the patients’ postoperative renal function, which, if impaired, could further cloud the meaning of troponin increases.
Another interesting question could have been answered if the study design had included a group in which sevoflurane was used only during the cardiopulmonary bypass to assess its effect on myocardium when administered only during the most traumatic phase of the operation.
In other studies, isoflurane has been shown to exert protective properties on the heart.10 Isoflurane is considerably less expensive than sevoflurane. We look forward to studies including an isoflurane arm in the experimental design.
* Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
References
De Hert SG, Van der Linden PJ, Cromheecke S, Meeus R, Nelis A: Cardioprotective properties of sevoflurane in patients undergoing coronary surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass are related to the modalities of its administration. Anesthesiology 2004; 101:299–310De Hert, SG Van der Linden, PJ Cromheecke, S Meeus, R Nelis, A
Conzen PF, Fischer S, Detter C, Peter K: Sevoflurane provides greater protection of myocardium than propofol in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesthesiology 2003; 99:826–33Conzen, PF Fischer, S Detter, C Peter, K
Bertrand ME, Simoons ML, Fox KAA: Management of acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST segment elevation: Recommendations of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2002; 23:1809–40Bertrand, ME Simoons, ML Fox, KAA
Roongsritong C, Warraich I, Bradly C: Common causes of troponin elevations in the absence of acute myocardial infarction. Chest 2004; 125:1877–84Roongsritong, C Warraich, I Bradly, C
Bakshi TK, Choo MK, Edwards CC, Scott AG, Hart HH, Armstrong GP: Causes of elevated troponin I with a normal coronary. Intern Med J 2002; 32:520–5Bakshi, TK Choo, MK Edwards, CC Scott, AG Hart, HH Armstrong, GP
Ricchiuti V, Sharkey SW, Murakami MM: Cardiac troponin I and T alteration in dog hearts with myocardial infarction: Correlation with infarct size. Am J Clin Path 1998; 110:241–7Ricchiuti, V Sharkey, SW Murakami, MM
Fellahi JL, Gue X, Richomme X, Monier E, Guillou: Short- and long-term prognostic value of postoperative cardiac troponin I concentration in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesthesiology 2003; 99:270–4Fellahi, JL Gue, X Richomme, X Monier, E Guillou,
Khan IA, Wattanasuwan N, Mehta NJ, Tun A, Singh N: Prognostic value of serum cardiac troponin I in ambulatory patients with chronic renal failure undergoing long-term hemodialysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38:991–8Khan, IA Wattanasuwan, N Mehta, NJ Tun, A Singh, N
Mockel M, Schindler R, Knorr L: Prognostic value of cardiac troponin T and I elevations in renal disease patients without acute coronary syndrome: A 9-month outcome analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14:1489–95Mockel, M Schindler, R Knorr, L
Kersten JR, Schmeling TJ, Pagel PS, Gross GJ, Waltier DC: Isoflurane mimics ischemic preconditioning via  activation of KATPchannels: Reduction of myocardial infarct size with an acute memory phase. Anesthesiology 1997; 87:361–70Kersten, JR Schmeling, TJ Pagel, PS Gross, GJ Waltier, DC