Free
Case Reports  |   May 2005
Retrograde Intubation around an In Situ Combitube: A Difficult Airway Management Strategy
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • William L. Harrison, M.D.
    *
  • Marc L. Bertrand, M.D.
  • Steven K. Andeweg, M.D.
  • Jeffrey A. Clark, M.D.
  • * Anesthesiology Resident, † Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center.
Article Information
Case Reports / Airway Management
Case Reports   |   May 2005
Retrograde Intubation around an In Situ Combitube: A Difficult Airway Management Strategy
Anesthesiology 5 2005, Vol.102, 1061-1062. doi:
Anesthesiology 5 2005, Vol.102, 1061-1062. doi:
WE describe a unique airway management experience involving the Combitube and intubation over a retrograde-placed wire.
Case Report
We responded to a trauma alert at our institution for a 62 yr-old (113 kg, 192 cm) man who was involved in a motorcycle accident and sustained a closed-head injury. During transport his level of consciousness deteriorated, and the paramedic crew attempted a rapid sequence induction and tracheal intubation to secure the airway. An experienced flight nurse was unable to visualize vocal cords. After two attempts at direct laryngoscopy the patient began to experience oxygen desaturation and the crew placed a Combitube 37-French SA as a rescue airway (Tyco Healthcare Group, Mansfield, MA).1,2 The patient was successfully ventilated via  the blue (pharyngeal) lumen, confirming placement of the tip of the Combitube in the proximal esophagus.
On arrival in the emergency department the patient was obtunded and on a backboard. His cervical spine was immobilized with a collar, and he had an oxygen saturation of 100%. Breath sounds were auscultated bilaterally, and the initial end-tidal carbon dioxide measured 30 mmHg with ventilation by Ambu-bag. He was placed on a mechanical ventilator and noted to have a large air leak. Although the pilot balloons on the Combitube remained inflated and firm, gas could be heard escaping from the patient’s mouth during ventilation. This did not resolve with insufflation of more air into the pharyngeal cuff. A resident physician and staff anesthesiologist attempted direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh #4 blade with inline stabilization of the cervical spine, cricoid pressure, and deflation of the pharyngeal cuff. They were unable to visualize recognizable structures, including the epiglottis. A moderate amount of blood was noted in the pharynx, but suctioning it did not improve the view.
Although oxygen saturation remained at 100%, a more definitive airway was required to provide adequate ventilation. It was thought to be inappropriate to remove the Combitube given multiple failed attempts at direct laryngoscopy. An attempt at fiberoptic intubation was dismissed given the findings of blood in the pharynx. In discussion with the trauma surgical team, we decided to attempt placement of a retrograde wire to achieve tracheal intubation. Surgical staff was present and prepared to intervene with a surgical airway if needed.
The pharyngeal balloon on the Combitube was deflated and ventilation held. A retrograde wire was placed through the cricothyroid membrane using the direct Seldinger technique (Cook Retrograde Intubation Set; Cook Critical Care, Bloomington, Indiana). The wire was advanced until it exited the left naris. A semirigid intubation catheter from the retrograde kit was passed over the wire. A lubricated 7.0-mm ID endotracheal tube was advanced over the wire/catheter assembly and into the trachea. The wire and catheter were removed, the endotracheal tube cuff was inflated, and the patient’s lungs were ventilated. Bilateral breath sounds and positive end-tidal carbon dioxide confirmed correct placement of the endotracheal tube. The Combitube was subsequently removed. It appeared grossly normal and without any obvious defects. The patient subsequently received a tracheostomy to manage his airway and required a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit.
Discussion
This case underscores several important points. The Combitube is well described as an aid in securing the airway when attempts at conventional intubation and ventilation have failed.3 Experience has shown that removing a rescue airway, even if it is not providing optimal ventilation, can lead to a “can’t ventilate, can’t intubate” scenario. However, airway exchange with a Combitube may be difficult. During placement, the Combitube is inserted into the esophagus 95% of the time.3 This precludes airway exchange over a wire, bronchoscope, or catheter without special preplacement modifications to the Combitube.4 In the minority of cases in which the Combitube is placed in the trachea, airway exchange for an endotracheal tube can proceed using a wire or small diameter airway exchange catheter.
Despite this limitation, techniques for airway exchange with a Combitube in the esophageal location have been described. Gaitini et al.  described transnasal passage of an armored endotracheal tube over a fiberoptic bronchoscope with a Combitube in place.5 Although similar to our approach of not removing the Combitube, this technique may be limited by the availability of the fiberoptic scope and the presence of blood or mucus in the pharynx that may make visualization difficult. At least two reports demonstrate retrograde intubation via  the laryngeal mask airway.6,7 Again, this is a similar approach of not removing the rescue device while securing the airway with an endotracheal tube.
The retrograde technique is an accepted method for securing the airway.8,9 It may be especially useful in patients with facial trauma or hemorrhage or when manipulation of the cervical spine is either impossible or contraindicated. Many trauma patients have facial or neck injuries and oral blood and some may have prehospital placement of a Combitube. Retrograde intubation and the use of a Combitube may be complimentary in these situations, although further experience with this technique is certainly necessary. Nasotracheal intubation is contraindicated in patients with certain facial injuries or basilar skull fractures, neither of which was suspected in our patient. The inability to intubate the trachea is an indication for a surgical airway,10 but in discussion with the surgical trauma team, it was thought that the Combitube was serving both as an airway and a means to decrease the risk of aspiration. Therefore it was thought appropriate to attempt retrograde intubation with a surgical airway as a backup.
We do not know whether advancing the wire into the mouth with a Combitube in place is possible or if it would subsequently pose difficulties with antegrade passage of either the catheter or endotracheal tube. One could hypothesize that the nasal route of the wire may have allowed better alignment and ease of passage of the endotracheal tube. In summary, we have demonstrated that it is possible to perform retrograde intubation without removing an in situ  Combitube.
References
Blostein PA, Koestner AJ, Hoak S: Failed rapid sequence intubation in trauma patients: esophageal tracheal Combitube is a useful adjunct. J Trauma 1998; 44:534–7Blostein, PA Koestner, AJ Hoak, S
Davis DP, Valentine C, Ochs M, Vilke GM, Hoyt DB: The Combitube as a salvage airway device for paramedic rapid sequence intubation. Ann Emerg Med 2003; 42:697–704Davis, DP Valentine, C Ochs, M Vilke, GM Hoyt, DB
Agro F, Frass M, Benumof JL, Krafft P: Current status of the Combitube: A review of the literature. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14:307–14Agro, F Frass, M Benumof, JL Krafft, P
Krafft P, Roggla M, Fidrich P, Locker GJ, Frass M, Benumof JL: Bronchoscopy via a redesigned Combitube in the esophageal position: A clinical evaluation. Anesthesiology 1997; 86:1041–5Krafft, P Roggla, M Fidrich, P Locker, GJ Frass, M Benumof, JL
Gaitini LA, Vaida SJ, Somri M, Fradis M, Ben-David B: Fiberoptic-guided airway exchange of the esophageal-tracheal Combitube in spontaneously breathing versus mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg 1999; 88:193–6Gaitini, LA Vaida, SJ Somri, M Fradis, M Ben-David, B
Arndt GA, Topp J, Hannah J, McDowell TS, Lesko A: Intubation via the LMA using a Cook retrograde intubation kit. Can J Anaesth 1998; 45:257–60Arndt, GA Topp, J Hannah, J McDowell, TS Lesko, A
Harvey SC, Fishman RL, Edwards SM: Retrograde intubation through a laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology 1996; 85:1503–4Harvey, SC Fishman, RL Edwards, SM
Weksler N, Klein M, Weksler D, Sidelnick C, Chorni I, Rozentsveig V, Brill S, Gurman GM, Ovadia L: Retrograde tracheal intubation: Beyond fibreoptic endotracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48:412–6Weksler, N Klein, M Weksler, D Sidelnick, C Chorni, I Rozentsveig, V Brill, S Gurman, GM Ovadia, L
An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway: Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway. Anesthesiology. 2003;98: 1269–77An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway,
American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma: Advanced Trauma Life Support for Doctors, 6th edition. Chicago, American College of Surgeons, 1997, pp 61–72American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, Chicago American College of Surgeons