Free
Correspondence  |   November 2004
Is There Any Reason to Withhold α2Agonists from Patients with Coronary Disease during Surgery?
Author Notes
  • * Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Article Information
Correspondence
Correspondence   |   November 2004
Is There Any Reason to Withhold α2Agonists from Patients with Coronary Disease during Surgery?
Anesthesiology 11 2004, Vol.101, 1245-1246. doi:
Anesthesiology 11 2004, Vol.101, 1245-1246. doi:
In Reply:—
We appreciate the interest and valuable comments of Drs. Quintin and Ghignone in our Editorial View published in the January issue of Anesthesiology.1 Along with β blockers, α2agonists may offer significant protection against cardiac morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery.2–5 α2Agonists have also been proposed as an alternative cardioprotective treatment strategy in high-risk surgical patients who have relative or absolute contraindication to β-blocker use.6 To support their view, Drs. Quintin and Ghignone refer to large-scale clinical trials and several meta-analyses performed in recent years. However, the only large-scale study available to date is that of Oliver et al.  ,5 which showed no overall effect of mivazerol (an intravenous α2agonist) on the prespecified combined endpoint of myocardial infarction and cardiac death in the whole study population of 2,854 patients. Only a post hoc  analysis showed that in a subgroup of 904 patients with known coronary artery disease who underwent major vascular surgery, mivazerol was associated with a significantly lower incidence of the combined endpoint. The meta-analyses cited also show similar findings that perioperative benefits may depend largely on the patients at risk and the surgical procedure involved, with the largest benefit observed in patients undergoing major vascular surgery.2–4 These findings and Drs. Quintin and Ghignone’s7 own experience prompted them to surmise that clinicians could consider α2agonists as first-line drugs. However, the previous meta-analysis that concluded that clonidine reduced perioperative ischemia4 was underpowered (358 noncardiac surgical patients in two studies), and effects were only reported on ischemia.3 Furthermore, the results of the two more recent meta-analyses2,3 are mainly driven by the results of the large-scale mivazerol trial.
In summary, we agree with the statement of Drs. Quintin and Ghignone that future studies directly comparing α2agonists and β blockers are needed. Until then, high-risk patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery should be given β blockers that not only reduce perioperative cardiac morbidity but also improve long-term outcome in patients with coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, and hypertension.8–11 In case of contraindication to β blockers, an α2agonist should be considered as a possible alternative to reduce perioperative cardiac complications.12 
* Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
References
Kertai MD, Bax JJ, Klein J, Poldermans D: Is there any reason to withhold β blockers from high-risk patients with coronary disease during surgery? Anesthesiology 2004; 100:4–7Kertai, MD Bax, JJ Klein, J Poldermans, D
Stevens RD, Burri H, Tramer MR: Pharmacologic myocardial protection in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: A quantitative systematic review. Anesth Analg 2003; 97:623–33Stevens, RD Burri, H Tramer, MR
Wijeysundera DN, Naik JS, Scott Beattie W: Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists to prevent perioperative cardiovascular complications: A meta-analysis. Am J Med 2003; 114:742–52Wijeysundera, DN Naik, JS Scott, Beattie
Nishina K, Mikawa K, Uesugi T, Obara H, Maekawa M, Kamae I, Nishi N: Efficacy of clonidine for prevention of perioperative myocardial ischemia: A critical appraisal and meta-analysis of the literature. Anesthesiology 2002; 96:323–9Nishina, K Mikawa, K Uesugi, T Obara, H Maekawa, M Kamae, I Nishi, N
Oliver MF, Goldman L, Julian DG, Holme I: Effect of mivazerol on perioperative cardiac complications during non–cardiac surgery in patients with coronary heart disease: The European Mivazerol Trial (EMIT). Anesthesiology 1999; 91:951–61Oliver, MF Goldman, L Julian, DG Holme, I
Fleisher LA, Eagle KA: Lowering cardiac risk in noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1677–82Fleisher, LA Eagle, KA
Ghignone M, Quintin L, Duke PC, Kehler CH, Calvillo O: Effects of clonidine on narcotic requirements and hemodynamic response during induction of fentanyl anesthesia and endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1986; 64:36–42Ghignone, M Quintin, L Duke, PC Kehler, CH Calvillo, O
Kertai MD, Boersma E, Bax JJ, Thomson IR, Cramer MJ, van de Ven LLM, Scheffer MG, Trocino G, Vigna C, Baars HF, van Urk H, Roelandt JRTC, Poldermans D: Optimizing long-term cardiac management after major vascular surgery: Role of beta-blocker therapy, clinical characteristics, and dobutamine stress echocardiography to optimize long-term cardiac management after major vascular surgery. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163:2230–5Kertai, MD Boersma, E Bax, JJ Thomson, IR Cramer, MJ van de Ven, LLM Scheffer, MG Trocino, G Vigna, C Baars, HF van Urk, H Roelandt, JRTC Poldermans, D
Borrello F, Beahan M, Klein L, Gheorghiade M: Reappraisal of beta-blocker therapy in the acute and chronic post-myocardial infarction period. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93:21B–9BBorrello, F Beahan, M Klein, L Gheorghiade, M
Dargie HJ: Effect of carvedilol on outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction: The CAPRICORN randomised trial. Lancet 2001; 357:1385–90Dargie, HJ
Poole-Wilson PA, Swedberg K, Cleland JG, Di Lenarda A, Hanrath P, Komajda M, Lubsen J, Lutiger B, Metra M, Remme WJ, Torp-Pedersen C, Scherhag A, Skene A: Comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure in the Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET): Randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003; 362:7–13Poole-Wilson, PA Swedberg, K Cleland, JG Di Lenarda, A Hanrath, P Komajda, M Lubsen, J Lutiger, B Metra, M Remme, WJ Torp-Pedersen, C Scherhag, A Skene, A
Goldman L: Evidence-based perioperative risk reduction. Am J Med 2003; 114:763–4Goldman, L