Free
Meeting Abstracts  |   October 2004
Remifentanil Preconditioning Protects against Ischemic Injury in the Intact Rat Heart
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ye Zhang, M.D.
    *
  • Michael G. Irwin, M.B., Ch.B., M.D., F.R.C.A., F.H.K.A.M.
  • Tak Ming Wong, Ph.D.
  • * Research Fellow, Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Hong Kong, and Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, Anhui Medical University, Anhui, China. † Associate Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Hong Kong. ‡ Professor and Head, Department of Physiology, University of Hong Kong.
Article Information
Meeting Abstracts   |   October 2004
Remifentanil Preconditioning Protects against Ischemic Injury in the Intact Rat Heart
Anesthesiology 10 2004, Vol.101, 918-923. doi:
Anesthesiology 10 2004, Vol.101, 918-923. doi:
OPIOID receptors (OR) are involved in cardiovascular regulation,1–3 and several studies have found that activation of certain ORs can induce a cardioprotective effect similar to classic and delayed ischemic preconditioning (IPC).4–6 It is believed that opioid-peptides exert this effect by interaction with Gi-protein coupled receptors.7–9 There is evidence that both Δ- (especially Δ1)10,11 and κ12,13 -ORs are involved in opioid-induced cardioprotection. Several studies have found that intravenous administration of morphine can mimic the effect of IPC to reduce infarct size (IS) in anesthetized open-chest rats.9,10,14 Combined administration of isoflurane and morphine produces a synergistic reduction in myocardial IS in rats.15 Fentanyl has been shown to alleviate postischemic ventricular dysfunction in rats with this cardioprotective effect apparently mediated by Δ-ORs.16,17 
Remifentanil is a new ultra-short-acting phenylpiperidine opioid analgesic agent that is rapidly metabolized by nonspecific blood and tissue esterases.18 It has an analgesic potency similar to that of fentanyl and 100 times greater than morphine,19 the opioids that have been most extensively studied in cardioprotection. Ligand-binding data show that remifentanil has a high degree of μ-OR selectivity (EC50= 2.6 nm) with a lower affinity for Δ (EC50= 66 nm) and κ (EC50= 6.1 μm) ORs,20 and its effect on postischemic myocardium is still unknown.
The heart has Δ-ORs and κ-ORs.3,21,22 It has been shown that the cardioprotection of morphine preconditioning is mediated via  the Δ-OR,11 and there is also evidence that it is mediated via  both Δ-ORs and κ-ORs.13,23 
This study aimed to determine whether remifentanil, like morphine and fentanyl, confers cardioprotection against ischemia-induced injury and, if so, which ORs mediate this effect. We also compared the effects of remifentanil with those of ischemic preconditioning.
Materials and Methods
This study was conducted in accordance with our institutional guidelines on the use of live animals for research and the experimental protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Hong Kong.
Surgical Preparation
Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 300–350 g were used. The rats were anesthetized by intraperitoneal administration of pentobarbitone (50 mg/kg body weight) and maintained by repeat doses of 25 mg/kg every 60–90 min. All of the animals underwent tracheotomy and tracheal intubation. Mechanical ventilation was provided with a Harvard Apparatus Rodent Respirator (Harvard Apparatus, Boston, MA), and the rats were ventilated with room air at 60–70 breaths/min. Body temperature was monitored and maintained at 37 ± 1°C (mean ± SD) using a heating pad. The carotid artery was cannulated to measure mean blood pressure via  a pressure transducer, and a Lead-II electrocardiogram monitored heart rate via  subcutaneous stainless steel electrodes. These were connected to a PowerLab monitoring system (ML750 PowerLab/4sp with MLT0380 Reusable BP Transducer; AD Instruments, Colorado Springs, CO). The right jugular vein was cannulated to infuse saline or drugs. A left thoracotomy was performed to expose the heart at the fifth intercostal space. After removing the pericardium, a 6–0 Prolene loop, along with a snare occluder, was placed at the origin of the left coronary artery. Regional ischemia was achieved by pulling the snare and securing the threads with a mosquito hemostat. Ischemia was confirmed by a substantial decrease in left ventricular pressure, electrocardiographic changes, and cardiac cyanosis. After surgical preparation, the rat was allowed to stabilize for 15 min.
Study Groups and Experimental Protocol
The current study consisted of two series of experiments. To determine whether the administration of remifentanil (GlaxoSmithKline Limited, Hong Kong) limits myocardial infarct size, rats were randomly assigned to receive one of seven treatments (fig. 1): control (CON, saline vehicle), ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and remifentanil preconditioning (RPC) using five doses: 0.2, 0.6, 2, 6, and 20 μg·kg−1·min−1. All animals received 30 min of occlusion of the left coronary artery followed by 2 h of reperfusion. Before the 30-min occlusion, rats were subjected to either preconditioning by ischemia (IPC, 5-min occlusion, 5-min reperfusion × 3) or pretreatment with remifentanil with the same regimen (3 × 5-min infusions). These experiments will be referred to as Series 1.
Fig. 1. All group hearts were subject to 30 min of occlusion and 120 min of reperfusion. Before ischemia, ischemic preconditioning (IPC) hearts were subject to three 5-min cycles of occlusion interspersed with 5 min of reperfusion, whereas remifentanil preconditioning (RPC) hearts were subject to three 5-min cycles of infusion of remifentanil (0.2, 0.6, 2, 6, or 20 μg·kg−1·min−1) interspersed with 5-min drug-free periods.  Occ  = occlusion of the left coronary artery;  rep  = reperfusion;  rem  = infusion of remifentanil, and  free  = drug-free periods. 
Fig. 1. All group hearts were subject to 30 min of occlusion and 120 min of reperfusion. Before ischemia, ischemic preconditioning (IPC) hearts were subject to three 5-min cycles of occlusion interspersed with 5 min of reperfusion, whereas remifentanil preconditioning (RPC) hearts were subject to three 5-min cycles of infusion of remifentanil (0.2, 0.6, 2, 6, or 20 μg·kg−1·min−1) interspersed with 5-min drug-free periods.  Occ  = occlusion of the left coronary artery;  rep  = reperfusion;  rem  = infusion of remifentanil, and  free  = drug-free periods. 
Fig. 1. All group hearts were subject to 30 min of occlusion and 120 min of reperfusion. Before ischemia, ischemic preconditioning (IPC) hearts were subject to three 5-min cycles of occlusion interspersed with 5 min of reperfusion, whereas remifentanil preconditioning (RPC) hearts were subject to three 5-min cycles of infusion of remifentanil (0.2, 0.6, 2, 6, or 20 μg·kg−1·min−1) interspersed with 5-min drug-free periods.  Occ  = occlusion of the left coronary artery;  rep  = reperfusion;  rem  = infusion of remifentanil, and  free  = drug-free periods. 
×
Subsequently, to test which opioid receptor was involved in mediating the effects of remifentanil and ischemic preconditioning, rats were randomly assigned to one of 12 groups (fig. 2) as follows:
Fig. 2. Experimental protocol used to determine which opioid receptor mediates the cardioprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and remifentanil preconditioning (RPC, 20 μg·kg−1·min−1). Naltrindole (NTD, a selective Δ-OR antagonist, 5 mg/kg) and CTOP (a selective μ-OR antagonist, 1 mg/kg) intravenously 10 min before ischemia, IPC, or RPC. Nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI, a selective κ-OR antagonist, 5 mg/kg) intravenously 15 min before ischemia, IPC, or RPC.  Occ  = occlusion of the left coronary artery;  rep  = reperfusion;  rem  = infusion of remifentanil, and  free  = drug-free periods. 
Fig. 2. Experimental protocol used to determine which opioid receptor mediates the cardioprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and remifentanil preconditioning (RPC, 20 μg·kg−1·min−1). Naltrindole (NTD, a selective Δ-OR antagonist, 5 mg/kg) and CTOP (a selective μ-OR antagonist, 1 mg/kg) intravenously 10 min before ischemia, IPC, or RPC. Nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI, a selective κ-OR antagonist, 5 mg/kg) intravenously 15 min before ischemia, IPC, or RPC.  Occ  = occlusion of the left coronary artery;  rep  = reperfusion;  rem  = infusion of remifentanil, and  free  = drug-free periods. 
Fig. 2. Experimental protocol used to determine which opioid receptor mediates the cardioprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and remifentanil preconditioning (RPC, 20 μg·kg−1·min−1). Naltrindole (NTD, a selective Δ-OR antagonist, 5 mg/kg) and CTOP (a selective μ-OR antagonist, 1 mg/kg) intravenously 10 min before ischemia, IPC, or RPC. Nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI, a selective κ-OR antagonist, 5 mg/kg) intravenously 15 min before ischemia, IPC, or RPC.  Occ  = occlusion of the left coronary artery;  rep  = reperfusion;  rem  = infusion of remifentanil, and  free  = drug-free periods. 
×
  1. Control (CON, saline vehicle).

  2. Naltrindole10 (NTD, a selective Δ-OR antagonist) 5 mg/kg intravenously 10 min before ischemia.

  3. Nor-binaltorphimine11 (nor-BNI, a κ-OR selective antagonist) 5 mg/kg intravenously 15 min before ischemia.

  4. CTOP24,25 (D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2, a μ-OR selective antagonist) 1 mg/kg intravenously 10 min before ischemia.

  5. RPC.

  6. IPC.

  7. NTD+RPC.

  8. NTD+IPC (5 mg/kg intravenously 10 min before RPC or IPC).

  9. Nor-BNI+RPC.

  10. Nor-BNI+IPC (5 mg/kg, intravenously 15 min before RPC or IPC).

  11. CTOP+RPC.

  12. CTOP+IPC (CTOP 1 mg/kg intravenously before RPC or IPC).

The chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO). These experiments will be referred to as Series 2.
Determination of Infarct Size
On completion of the reperfusion period, the heart was excised, transferred to a Langendorff apparatus, and perfused with normal saline for 1 min at a pressure of 100 cm H2O to flush out blood. The snare was securely retightened and 0.25% Evan blue dye was injected to stain the normally perfused region of the heart. This procedure allowed visualization of the normal, nonischemic region and the area at risk (AAR). The heart was then weighed, frozen, and cut into 2-mm slices. Thereafter, the slices were stained by incubation at 37°C for 20 min in 1% 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium (Sigma Chemical Co.)11,13,14 in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), and then were immersed in 10% formalin to enhance the contrast of the stain. The areas of infarct (2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium negative) and risk zone (2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium stained) for each slice were traced and digitized using a computerized planimetry technique (SigmaScan 4.0, Systat Software Inc., Richmond, CA). The volumes of the left ventricles, IS, and AAR were calculated by multiplying each area with slice thickness and summing the product. The IS was expressed as a percentage of the AAR (IS/AAR).
Statistical Analysis
Data analysis was performed with a personal computer statistical software package (Prism v4.0; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Data were expressed as mean ±SD. Hemodynamics were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni post hoc  test for multiple comparisons if significant F  ratios were obtained. IS (expressed as percentage of the area at risk) were analyzed between groups using analysis of variance with a Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc  test for multiple comparisons. Sigmoid dose-response nonlinear regression was used for remifentanil-treated rats. Statistical differences were considered significant if the P  value was <0.05.
Results
A total of 107 animals were used in the study. Animals were omitted from further data analysis if severe hypotension (arterial mean blood pressure less than 30 mmHg) or intractable ventricular fibrillation occurred. Consequently, five were excluded because of intractable ventricular fibrillation: one each in the control, RPC (0.2 μg·kg−1·min−1), NTD, NTD+IPC, and NTD+RPC groups. One animal in the CTOP+RPC group and one in the nor-BNI+IPC group were excluded because of severe hypotension. One animal in the IPC group was excluded because of an excessively large AAR volume (>0.550 mm3). A total of 99 animals completed the study.
Effects of Remifentanil or Ischemic Preconditioning on Myocardial Infarct after Ischemia and Reperfusion
As shown in table 1, remifentanil at 6 and 20 μg·kg−1·min−1significantly reduced the heart rate. At 0.6–20 μg·kg−1·min−1it also significantly reduced the mean blood pressure and rate pressure product. There was no difference in any of the hemodynamic parameters between control and treatment groups during ischemia and reperfusion with two exceptions: a slight, but significant drop in mean blood pressure in the groups preconditioned with 0.6 and 2 μg·kg−1·min−1RPC.
Table 1. Hemodynamic Parameters in Series 1 
Image not available
Table 1. Hemodynamic Parameters in Series 1 
×
The AAR ranged from 0.384 ± 0.084 cm3to 0.434 ± 0.117 cm3. There was no difference between the control and treatment groups. As shown in figure 3the IS, expressed as a percentage of the AAR, of the control group was 52.7 ± 5.5% (n = 9). In groups subjected to IPC and RPC the infarct sizes were significantly reduced. The reduction in IS in groups subjected to remifentanil PC in the range of 0.6–6 μg·kg−1·min−1were dose related, with a peak reduction at 6 μg·kg−1·min−1. The ED50was 2.69 μg·kg−1·min−1according to the sigmoid equation Y = 15.18 + 17.76/[1 + 10(2.57x)], r  =−0.898.
Fig. 3. Curve illustrating the relationship between IS/AAR and the dose of remifentanil. Infarct size (IS) expressed as a percentage of the area-at-risk (AAR). ED50is 2.7 μg·kg−1·min−1; sigmoid equation Y = 15.18 + 17.76/[1 + 10(-2.57-x)],  r  =−0.898.  IPC  = ischemic preconditioning;  RPC  = remifentanil preconditioning. Values are means ± SD. *  P  < 0.01  versus  control. 
Fig. 3. Curve illustrating the relationship between IS/AAR and the dose of remifentanil. Infarct size (IS) expressed as a percentage of the area-at-risk (AAR). ED50is 2.7 μg·kg−1·min−1; sigmoid equation Y = 15.18 + 17.76/[1 + 10(-2.57-x)],  r  =−0.898.  IPC  = ischemic preconditioning;  RPC  = remifentanil preconditioning. Values are means ± SD. *  P  < 0.01  versus  control. 
Fig. 3. Curve illustrating the relationship between IS/AAR and the dose of remifentanil. Infarct size (IS) expressed as a percentage of the area-at-risk (AAR). ED50is 2.7 μg·kg−1·min−1; sigmoid equation Y = 15.18 + 17.76/[1 + 10(-2.57-x)],  r  =−0.898.  IPC  = ischemic preconditioning;  RPC  = remifentanil preconditioning. Values are means ± SD. *  P  < 0.01  versus  control. 
×
Effects of Remifentanil or Ischemic PC on Myocardial Infarct after Ischemia and Reperfusion with Blockade of Opioid Receptors
There were no differences in hemodynamic parameters between control and treatment groups (data not shown). Nor was there any difference in AAR, which ranged from 0.329 ± 0.015 to 0.499 ± 0.092 cm3. IPC and RPC (6 μg·kg−1·min−1) markedly reduced IS/AAR from 52.7 ± 5.5% (n = 9) to 12.9 ± 3.4% (n = 9, P  < 0.01 versus  control) and 16.2 ± 6.4% (n = 7, P  < 0.01 versus  control), respectively. 1 mg/kg CTOP, a selective μ-OR antagonist, or 5 mg/kg NTD, a selective Δ-OR antagonist, administered 10 min before RPC completely abolished the cardioprotective effect of RPC (IS/AAR: CTOP+RPC 58.5 ± 4.6%, n = 5; NTD+RPC 47.4 ± 8.5%, n = 5, P  > 0.05 versus  control). 5 mg/kg nor-BNI, a selective κ-OR antagonist, administered 15 min before RPC attenuated the cardioprotective effect of RPC (IS/AAR: 33.1 ± 7.7%, n = 6, P  < 0.01 versus  control and RPC) (fig. 4). In the IPC group, blockade of the Δ-OR abolished, whereas blockade of the κ-OR attenuated, the protection (IS/AAR: NTD+IPC 47.6 ± 8.3%, n = 5, P  > 0.05 versus  control; nor-BNI+IPC 31.9 ± 5.7%, n = 6, P  < 0.01 versus  control and IPC) (fig. 5). Blockade of the μ-OR did not alter the cardioprotective effect of IPC (IS/AAR: 18.4 ± 3.2%, n = 5, P  < 0.01 versus  control and P  > 0.05 versus  IPC, respectively). The three antagonists did not change IS/AAR when either agent was administered to non-PC hearts (IS/AAR: NTD 51.6 ± 4.7%, n = 5, nor-BNI 50.3 ± 8.3%, n = 6, and CTOP 47.2 ± 5.3%, n = 6, P  > 0.05 versus  control, respectively) (fig. 5).
Fig. 4. The effect of opioid antagonists on remifentanil preconditioning. Infarct size (IS) expressed as a percentage of the area-at-risk (AAR). Infarct sizes in rat hearts subjected to control, remifentanil preconditioning (RPC, remifentanil 6 μg·kg−1·min−1×3), naltrindole (5 mg/kg, intravenous; NTD + RPC) given 10 min before the RPC, nor-binaltorphimine (5 mg/kg, intravenous; nor-BNI + RPC) given 15 min before the RPC, or CTOP (1 mg/kg, intravenous; CTOP + RPC) given 10 min before the RPC. Values are means ± SD. *  P  < 0.01  versus  control; †  P  < 0.01  versus  RPC. 
Fig. 4. The effect of opioid antagonists on remifentanil preconditioning. Infarct size (IS) expressed as a percentage of the area-at-risk (AAR). Infarct sizes in rat hearts subjected to control, remifentanil preconditioning (RPC, remifentanil 6 μg·kg−1·min−1×3), naltrindole (5 mg/kg, intravenous; NTD + RPC) given 10 min before the RPC, nor-binaltorphimine (5 mg/kg, intravenous; nor-BNI + RPC) given 15 min before the RPC, or CTOP (1 mg/kg, intravenous; CTOP + RPC) given 10 min before the RPC. Values are means ± SD. *  P  < 0.01  versus  control; †  P  < 0.01  versus  RPC. 
Fig. 4. The effect of opioid antagonists on remifentanil preconditioning. Infarct size (IS) expressed as a percentage of the area-at-risk (AAR). Infarct sizes in rat hearts subjected to control, remifentanil preconditioning (RPC, remifentanil 6 μg·kg−1·min−1×3), naltrindole (5 mg/kg, intravenous; NTD + RPC) given 10 min before the RPC, nor-binaltorphimine (5 mg/kg, intravenous; nor-BNI + RPC) given 15 min before the RPC, or CTOP (1 mg/kg, intravenous; CTOP + RPC) given 10 min before the RPC. Values are means ± SD. *  P  < 0.01  versus  control; †  P  < 0.01  versus  RPC. 
×
Fig. 5. The effect of opioid antagonists on ischemic preconditioning. Infarct size (IS) expressed as a percentage of the area-at-risk (AAR). Infarct sizes in rat hearts subjected to control, NTD or NTD+IPC (naltrindole 5 mg/kg, intravenous; 10 min before ischemia or IPC), CTOP or CTOP+IPC (CTOP 1 mg/kg, intravenous; 10 min before ischemia or IPC), nor-BNI or nor-BNI+IPC (nor-binaltorphimine, 5 mg/kg, intravenous; 15 min before ischemia), ischemic preconditioning (IPC). Values are means ± SD. *  P  < 0.01  versus  control; †  P  < 0.01  versus  IPC. 
Fig. 5. The effect of opioid antagonists on ischemic preconditioning. Infarct size (IS) expressed as a percentage of the area-at-risk (AAR). Infarct sizes in rat hearts subjected to control, NTD or NTD+IPC (naltrindole 5 mg/kg, intravenous; 10 min before ischemia or IPC), CTOP or CTOP+IPC (CTOP 1 mg/kg, intravenous; 10 min before ischemia or IPC), nor-BNI or nor-BNI+IPC (nor-binaltorphimine, 5 mg/kg, intravenous; 15 min before ischemia), ischemic preconditioning (IPC). Values are means ± SD. *  P  < 0.01  versus  control; †  P  < 0.01  versus  IPC. 
Fig. 5. The effect of opioid antagonists on ischemic preconditioning. Infarct size (IS) expressed as a percentage of the area-at-risk (AAR). Infarct sizes in rat hearts subjected to control, NTD or NTD+IPC (naltrindole 5 mg/kg, intravenous; 10 min before ischemia or IPC), CTOP or CTOP+IPC (CTOP 1 mg/kg, intravenous; 10 min before ischemia or IPC), nor-BNI or nor-BNI+IPC (nor-binaltorphimine, 5 mg/kg, intravenous; 15 min before ischemia), ischemic preconditioning (IPC). Values are means ± SD. *  P  < 0.01  versus  control; †  P  < 0.01  versus  IPC. 
×
Discussion
Remifentanil reduced IS dose-dependently in open chest anesthetized rats; this is the first time that a preconditioning effect has been demonstrated with remifentanil. More interestingly, the protective effect of RPC was abolished by all three OR antagonists CTOP, NTD, and nor-BNI, indicating that the effect of remifentanil is mediated via  μ-, Δ-, and κ-ORs.
A previous study has shown that a brief infusion of morphine can produce a preconditioning effect.10,14 Because the half-life of morphine is long, its effect may last beyond the preconditioning period. Therefore it is not clear whether the protective effect of morphine was a direct effect of morphine itself or the effect of preconditioning triggered by morphine. In the current study, we used an ultra-short acting μ-opioid agonist, remifentanil, and found that it also confers cardioprotection. However, in view of the extremely short half-life, it is likely that this drug mimics ischemic preconditioning.
Both Δ-ORs and κ-ORs are present in the heart.21,22 This study, in accordance with previous studies, has shown that these two receptors in the heart mediate the cardioprotection of IPC.12,13,23,26 There is no evidence of μ-ORs in the rat heart from binding studies21,22,27 or physiologic studies,28,29 and in the current study we also found that blockade of the μ-opioid receptor with its antagonist, CTOP, did not alter the cardioprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning, suggesting that an intracardiac μ-opioid receptor is not involved in the cardioprotection of ischemic preconditioning. We found that blockade of any of the three opioid receptors by systemic administration of selective opioid receptor antagonists abolished or attenuated the protective effect of remifentanil in the anesthetized rat. Therefore, the action of remifentanil may be mediated, at least partly, via  the cardiac Δ-ORs and κ-ORs but not by a cardiac μ-OR. It is possible that a μ-OR that is located outside the myocardium may also mediate the effect of remifentanil. One possibility is the central nervous system. During myocardial ischemia, there is an accumulation of norepinephrine in the myocardium as a result of an increased nonexocytotic release from sympathetic nerve terminals, which induces injury.30–33 There is evidence that activation of the μ-OR by morphine administered intrathecally reduces IS in a rat model of myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury34 and also depresses the somatocardiac reflex.35 It is possible that activation of the μ-OR in the central nervous system may inhibit the sympathetic influence on the heart, thus reducing the release of norepinephrine and injury during ischemia. This is supported by the clinical observation of decreased heart rates in patients receiving remifentanil-based anesthesia36 and could be an interesting area for further study.
Brief renal, mesenteric, or skeletal muscle ischemia of remote origin can effectively precondition the heart (“remote preconditioning”).37 This concept is consistent with the fact that regional cardiac ischemia can initiate global protection and render remote myocardium resistant to infarction (“preconditioning at a distance”).38 Therefore, another possibility is that remifentanil may have some effect on other organs that indirectly renders remote myocardium resistant to infarction.
A previous study showed that morphine, a predominantly μ-OR agonist, acts on the heart via  κ-ORs and Δ-ORs.23 It is, therefore, not surprising that remifentanil, also a μ-OR agonist, acts via  κ-ORs and Δ-ORs.
It is interesting that blockade of one of the three receptors abolished or markedly attenuated the effect of preconditioning. This is most likely attributable to the fact that activation of any one of the receptors leading to cardioprotection involves the same final common pathway, which may be cytosolic Ca2+overload, believed to be a precipitating factor of injury. If activation of one of the receptors leads to a significant reduction of Ca2+overload induced by ischemia, cardioprotection is achieved. Activation of another receptor in or outside the heart will not necessarily confer additional protection.
We also observed that remifentanil decreased heart rate, mean blood pressure, and rate pressure product in agreement with previous observations.36,39,40 However, other than a slight but significant reduction in mean blood pressure during ischemia in the groups preconditioned with 0.6 and 2.0 μg·kg−1·min−1, there were no differences in any of the hemodynamic parameters between the control and treatment groups during ischemia and reperfusion. This observation suggests that it is unlikely that the effect of preconditioning on myocardial infarct is related to alterations in hemodynamic parameters.
We found the effect of remifentanil on reducing infarct size was dose dependent. Given in clinically relevant larger doses to rats (from 0.2 to 20 μg·kg−1·min−1), remifentanil produces its maximum effect at a dose of 6 μg·kg−1·min−1with an ED50of 2.7 μg·kg−1·min−1, although it is difficult to extrapolate such doses from a small animal model to the human. Remifentanil is now being increasingly used in anesthesia because its unique pharmacokinetic profile allows it to be given in very high doses during surgery without fear of postoperative respiratory depression.18 
In summary, this study has provided evidence for the first time that RPC confers protection against injury induced by ischemia in the intact rat heart. All three subtypes of ORs, namely μ-ORs, Δ-ORs, and κ-ORs, mediate the action of remifentanil, although the μ-OR effect is likely to be initiated extracardiac.
The authors thank Mr. Chi Pui Mok, Technician, Department of Physiology, University of Hong Kong, for technical assistance.
References
May CN, Dashwood MR, Whitehead CJ, Mathias CJ: Differential cardiovascular and respiratory responses to central administration of selective opioid agonists in conscious rabbits: Correlation with receptor distribution. Br J Pharmacol 1989; 98:903–13May, CN Dashwood, MR Whitehead, CJ Mathias, CJ
Zhang WM, Jin WQ, Wong TM: Multiplicity of kappa opioid receptor binding in the rat cardiac sarcolemma. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1996; 28:1547–54Zhang, WM Jin, WQ Wong, TM
Zimlichman R, Gefel D, Eliahou H, Matas Z, Rosen B, Gass S, Ela C, Eilam Y, Vogel Z, Barg J: Expression of opioid receptors during heart ontogeny in normotensive and hypertensive rats. Circulation 1996; 93:1020–5Zimlichman, R Gefel, D Eliahou, H Matas, Z Rosen, B Gass, S Ela, C Eilam, Y Vogel, Z Barg, J
Schultz JE, Rose E, Yao Z, Gross GJ: Evidence for involvement of opioid receptors in ischemic preconditioning in rat hearts. Am J Physiol 1995; 268:H2157–61Schultz, JE Rose, E Yao, Z Gross, GJ
Benedict PE, Benedict MB, Su TP, Bolling SF: Opiate drugs and delta-receptor-mediated myocardial protection. Circulation 1999; 100:II357–60Benedict, PE Benedict, MB Su, TP Bolling, SF
Pyle WG, Smith TD, Hofmann PA: Cardioprotection with kappa-opioid receptor stimulation is associated with a slowing of cross-bridge cycling. Am J Physiol Circ Phys 2000; 279:H1941–8Pyle, WG Smith, TD Hofmann, PA
Yellon DM, Baxter GF, Garcia-Dorado D, Heusch G, Sumeray MS: Ischaemic preconditioning: Present position and future directions. Cardiovasc Res 1998; 37:21–33Yellon, DM Baxter, GF Garcia-Dorado, D Heusch, G Sumeray, MS
Fryer RM, Hsu AK, Eells JT, Nagase H, Gross GJ: Opioid-induced second window of cardioprotection: potential role of mitochondrial KATP channels. Circ Res 1999; 84:846–51Fryer, RM Hsu, AK Eells, JT Nagase, H Gross, GJ
Miki T, Cohen MV, Downey JM: Opioid receptor contributes to ischemic preconditioning through protein kinase C activation in rabbits. Mol Cell Biochem 1998; 186:3–12Miki, T Cohen, MV Downey, JM
Schultz JJ, Hsu AK, Gross GJ: Ischemic preconditioning and morphine-induced cardioprotection involve the delta (delta)-opioid receptor in the intact rat heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1997; 29:2187–95Schultz, JJ Hsu, AK Gross, GJ
Schultz JE, Hsu AK, Gross GJ: Ischemic preconditioning in the intact rat heart is mediated by delta1- but not mu- or kappa-opioid receptors. Circulation 1998; 97:1282–9Schultz, JE Hsu, AK Gross, GJ
Wu S, Li HY, Wong TM: Cardioprotection of preconditioning by metabolic inhibition in the rat ventricular myocyte: involvement of kappa-opioid receptor. Circ Res 1999; 84:1388–95Wu, S Li, HY Wong, TM
Wang GY, Wu S, Pei JM, Yu XC, Wong TM: Kappa- but not delta-opioid receptors mediate effects of ischemic preconditioning on both infarct and arrhythmia in rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2001; 280:H384–91Wang, GY Wu, S Pei, JM Yu, XC Wong, TM
Schultz JE, Hsu AK, Gross GJ: Morphine mimics the cardioprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning via a glibenclamide-sensitive mechanism in the rat heart. Circ Res 1996; 78:1100–4Schultz, JE Hsu, AK Gross, GJ
Ludwig LM, Patel HH, Gross GJ, Kersten JR, Pagel PS, Warltier DC: Morphine enhances pharmacological preconditioning by isoflurane: Role of mitochondrial K(ATP) channels and opioid receptors. Anesthesiology 2003; 98:705–11Ludwig, LM Patel, HH Gross, GJ Kersten, JR Pagel, PS Warltier, DC
Kato R, Foex P: Fentanyl reduces infarction but not stunning via delta-opioid receptors and protein kinase C in rats. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84:608–14Kato, R Foex, P
Kato R, Ross S, Foex P: Fentanyl protects the heart against ischaemic injury via opioid receptors, adenosine A1 receptors and KATP channel linked mechanisms in rats. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84:204–14Kato, R Ross, S Foex, P
Patel SS, Spencer CM: Remifentanil. Drugs 1996; 52:417–27Patel, SS Spencer, CM
Egan TD, Minto CF, Hermann DJ, Barr J, Muir KT, Shafer SL: Remifentanil versus alfentanil: Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy adult male volunteers. Anesthesiology 1996; 84:821–33Egan, TD Minto, CF Hermann, DJ Barr, J Muir, KT Shafer, SL
James MK, Feldman PL, Schuster SV, Bilotta JM, Brackeen MF, Leighton HJ: Opioid receptor activity of GI 87084B, a novel ultra-short acting analgesic, in isolated tissues. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1991; 259:712–8James, MK Feldman, PL Schuster, SV Bilotta, JM Brackeen, MF Leighton, HJ
Krumins SA, Faden AI, Feuerstein G: Opiate binding in rat hearts: Modulation of binding after hemorrhagic shock. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1985; 127:120–8Krumins, SA Faden, AI Feuerstein, G
Ventura C, Bastagli L, Bernardi P, Caldarera CM, Guarnieri C: Opioid receptors in rat cardiac sarcolemma: Effect of phenylephrine and isoproterenol. Biochim Biophys Acta 1989; 987:69–74Ventura, C Bastagli, L Bernardi, P Caldarera, CM Guarnieri, C
Ela C, Barg J, Vogel Z, Hasin Y, Eilam Y: Distinct components of morphine effects on cardiac myocytes are mediated by the kappa and delta opioid receptors. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1997; 29:711–20Ela, C Barg, J Vogel, Z Hasin, Y Eilam, Y
Hawkins KN, Knapp RJ, Lui GK, Gulya K, Kazmierski W, Wan YP, Pelton JT, Hruby VJ, Yamamura HI: [3H]-[H-D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2] ([3H]CTOP), a potent and highly selective peptide for mu opioid receptors in rat brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1989; 248:73–80Hawkins, KN Knapp, RJ Lui, GK Gulya, K Kazmierski, W Wan, YP Pelton, JT Hruby, VJ Yamamura, HI
Catheline G, Le Guen S, Besson JM: Effects of opioid receptor antagonists on the effects of i.v. morphine on carrageenin evoked c-Fos expression in the superficial dorsal horn of the rat spinal cord. Brain Res 1999; 824:105–11Catheline, G Le Guen, S Besson, JM
Valtchanova-Matchouganska A, Ojewole JA: Involvement of opioid delta (delta)- and kappa (kappa)-receptors in ischemic preconditioning in a rat model of myocardial infarction. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 2002; 24:139–44Valtchanova-Matchouganska, A Ojewole, JA
Tai KK, Jin WQ, Chan TK, Wong TM: Characterization of [3H]U69593 binding sites in the rat heart by receptor binding assays. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1991; 23:1297–302Tai, KK Jin, WQ Chan, TK Wong, TM
Wong TM, Lee AY, Tai KK: Effects of drugs interacting with opioid receptors during normal perfusion or ischemia and reperfusion in the isolated rat heart: An attempt to identify cardiac opioid receptor subtype(s) involved in arrhythmogenesis. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1990; 22:1167–75Wong, TM Lee, AY Tai, KK
Ventura C, Spurgeon H, Lakatta EG, Guarnieri C, Capogrossi MC: Kappa and delta opioid receptor stimulation affects cardiac myocyte function and Ca2+ release from an intracellular pool in myocytes and neurons. Circ Res 1992; 70:66–81Ventura, C Spurgeon, H Lakatta, EG Guarnieri, C Capogrossi, MC
Miura T, Kawamura S, Tatsuno H, Ikeda Y, Mikami S, Iwamoto H, Okamura T, Iwatate M, Kimura M, Dairaku Y, Maekawa T, Matsuzaki M: Ischemic preconditioning attenuates cardiac sympathetic nerve injury via ATP-sensitive potassium channels during myocardial ischemia 2001; 104:1053–8
Seyfarth M, Feng Y, Hagl S, Sebening F, Richardt G, Schomig A: Effect of myocardial ischemia on stimulation-evoked noradrenaline release: Modulated neurotransmission in rat, guinea pig, and human cardiac tissue. Circ Res 1993; 73:496–502Seyfarth, M Feng, Y Hagl, S Sebening, F Richardt, G Schomig, A
Seyfarth M, Richardt G, Mizsnyak A, Kurz T, Schomig A: Transient ischemia reduces norepinephrine release during sustained ischemia: Neural preconditioning in isolated rat heart. Circ Res 1996; 78:573–80Seyfarth, M Richardt, G Mizsnyak, A Kurz, T Schomig, A
Kurz T, Offner B, Schreieck J, Richardt G, Tolg R, Schomig A: Nonexocytotic noradrenaline release and ventricular fibrillation in ischemic rat hearts. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 1995; 352:491–6Kurz, T Offner, B Schreieck, J Richardt, G Tolg, R Schomig, A
Groban L, Vernon JC, Butterworth J: Intrathecal morphine reduces infarct size in a rat model of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Anesth Analg 2004; 98:903–9Groban, L Vernon, JC Butterworth, J
Uchida S, Suzuki A, Hotta H, Sato A: The effects of morphine on supraspinal and propriospinal somatocardiac reflexes in anesthetized rats. Neurosci Lett 1999; 269:161–4Uchida, S Suzuki, A Hotta, H Sato, A
Elliott P, O'Hare R, Bill KM, Phillips AS, Gibson FM, Mirakhur RK: Severe cardiovascular depression with remifentanil. Anesth Analg 2000; 91:58–61Elliott, P O'Hare, R Bill, KM Phillips, AS Gibson, FM Mirakhur, RK
Weinbrenner C, Nelles M, Herzog N, Sarvary L, Strasser RH: Remote preconditioning by infrarenal occlusion of the aorta protects the heart from infarction: A newly identified non-neuronal but PKC-dependent pathway. Cardiovasc Res 2002; 55:590–601Weinbrenner, C Nelles, M Herzog, N Sarvary, L Strasser, RH
Przyklenk K, Bauer B, Ovize M, Kloner RA, Whittaker P: Regional ischemic ‘preconditioning' protects remote virgin myocardium from subsequent sustained coronary occlusion. Circulation 1993; 87:893–9Przyklenk, K Bauer, B Ovize, M Kloner, RA Whittaker, P
Haidar SH, Moreton JE, Liang Z, Hoke JF, Muir KT, Eddington ND: Evaluating a possible pharmacokinetic interaction between remifentanil and esmolol in the rat. J Pharmacol Sci 1997; 86:1278–82Haidar, SH Moreton, JE Liang, Z Hoke, JF Muir, KT Eddington, ND
Shinohara K, Aono H, Unruh GK, Kindscher JD, Goto H: Suppressive effects of remifentanil on hemodynamics in baro-denervated rabbits. Can J Anaesth 2000; 47:361–6Shinohara, K Aono, H Unruh, GK Kindscher, JD Goto, H
Fig. 1. All group hearts were subject to 30 min of occlusion and 120 min of reperfusion. Before ischemia, ischemic preconditioning (IPC) hearts were subject to three 5-min cycles of occlusion interspersed with 5 min of reperfusion, whereas remifentanil preconditioning (RPC) hearts were subject to three 5-min cycles of infusion of remifentanil (0.2, 0.6, 2, 6, or 20 μg·kg−1·min−1) interspersed with 5-min drug-free periods.  Occ  = occlusion of the left coronary artery;  rep  = reperfusion;  rem  = infusion of remifentanil, and  free  = drug-free periods. 
Fig. 1. All group hearts were subject to 30 min of occlusion and 120 min of reperfusion. Before ischemia, ischemic preconditioning (IPC) hearts were subject to three 5-min cycles of occlusion interspersed with 5 min of reperfusion, whereas remifentanil preconditioning (RPC) hearts were subject to three 5-min cycles of infusion of remifentanil (0.2, 0.6, 2, 6, or 20 μg·kg−1·min−1) interspersed with 5-min drug-free periods.  Occ  = occlusion of the left coronary artery;  rep  = reperfusion;  rem  = infusion of remifentanil, and  free  = drug-free periods. 
Fig. 1. All group hearts were subject to 30 min of occlusion and 120 min of reperfusion. Before ischemia, ischemic preconditioning (IPC) hearts were subject to three 5-min cycles of occlusion interspersed with 5 min of reperfusion, whereas remifentanil preconditioning (RPC) hearts were subject to three 5-min cycles of infusion of remifentanil (0.2, 0.6, 2, 6, or 20 μg·kg−1·min−1) interspersed with 5-min drug-free periods.  Occ  = occlusion of the left coronary artery;  rep  = reperfusion;  rem  = infusion of remifentanil, and  free  = drug-free periods. 
×
Fig. 2. Experimental protocol used to determine which opioid receptor mediates the cardioprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and remifentanil preconditioning (RPC, 20 μg·kg−1·min−1). Naltrindole (NTD, a selective Δ-OR antagonist, 5 mg/kg) and CTOP (a selective μ-OR antagonist, 1 mg/kg) intravenously 10 min before ischemia, IPC, or RPC. Nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI, a selective κ-OR antagonist, 5 mg/kg) intravenously 15 min before ischemia, IPC, or RPC.  Occ  = occlusion of the left coronary artery;  rep  = reperfusion;  rem  = infusion of remifentanil, and  free  = drug-free periods. 
Fig. 2. Experimental protocol used to determine which opioid receptor mediates the cardioprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and remifentanil preconditioning (RPC, 20 μg·kg−1·min−1). Naltrindole (NTD, a selective Δ-OR antagonist, 5 mg/kg) and CTOP (a selective μ-OR antagonist, 1 mg/kg) intravenously 10 min before ischemia, IPC, or RPC. Nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI, a selective κ-OR antagonist, 5 mg/kg) intravenously 15 min before ischemia, IPC, or RPC.  Occ  = occlusion of the left coronary artery;  rep  = reperfusion;  rem  = infusion of remifentanil, and  free  = drug-free periods. 
Fig. 2. Experimental protocol used to determine which opioid receptor mediates the cardioprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) and remifentanil preconditioning (RPC, 20 μg·kg−1·min−1). Naltrindole (NTD, a selective Δ-OR antagonist, 5 mg/kg) and CTOP (a selective μ-OR antagonist, 1 mg/kg) intravenously 10 min before ischemia, IPC, or RPC. Nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI, a selective κ-OR antagonist, 5 mg/kg) intravenously 15 min before ischemia, IPC, or RPC.  Occ  = occlusion of the left coronary artery;  rep  = reperfusion;  rem  = infusion of remifentanil, and  free  = drug-free periods. 
×
Fig. 3. Curve illustrating the relationship between IS/AAR and the dose of remifentanil. Infarct size (IS) expressed as a percentage of the area-at-risk (AAR). ED50is 2.7 μg·kg−1·min−1; sigmoid equation Y = 15.18 + 17.76/[1 + 10(-2.57-x)],  r  =−0.898.  IPC  = ischemic preconditioning;  RPC  = remifentanil preconditioning. Values are means ± SD. *  P  < 0.01  versus  control. 
Fig. 3. Curve illustrating the relationship between IS/AAR and the dose of remifentanil. Infarct size (IS) expressed as a percentage of the area-at-risk (AAR). ED50is 2.7 μg·kg−1·min−1; sigmoid equation Y = 15.18 + 17.76/[1 + 10(-2.57-x)],  r  =−0.898.  IPC  = ischemic preconditioning;  RPC  = remifentanil preconditioning. Values are means ± SD. *  P  < 0.01  versus  control. 
Fig. 3. Curve illustrating the relationship between IS/AAR and the dose of remifentanil. Infarct size (IS) expressed as a percentage of the area-at-risk (AAR). ED50is 2.7 μg·kg−1·min−1; sigmoid equation Y = 15.18 + 17.76/[1 + 10(-2.57-x)],  r  =−0.898.  IPC  = ischemic preconditioning;  RPC  = remifentanil preconditioning. Values are means ± SD. *  P  < 0.01  versus  control. 
×
Fig. 4. The effect of opioid antagonists on remifentanil preconditioning. Infarct size (IS) expressed as a percentage of the area-at-risk (AAR). Infarct sizes in rat hearts subjected to control, remifentanil preconditioning (RPC, remifentanil 6 μg·kg−1·min−1×3), naltrindole (5 mg/kg, intravenous; NTD + RPC) given 10 min before the RPC, nor-binaltorphimine (5 mg/kg, intravenous; nor-BNI + RPC) given 15 min before the RPC, or CTOP (1 mg/kg, intravenous; CTOP + RPC) given 10 min before the RPC. Values are means ± SD. *  P  < 0.01  versus  control; †  P  < 0.01  versus  RPC. 
Fig. 4. The effect of opioid antagonists on remifentanil preconditioning. Infarct size (IS) expressed as a percentage of the area-at-risk (AAR). Infarct sizes in rat hearts subjected to control, remifentanil preconditioning (RPC, remifentanil 6 μg·kg−1·min−1×3), naltrindole (5 mg/kg, intravenous; NTD + RPC) given 10 min before the RPC, nor-binaltorphimine (5 mg/kg, intravenous; nor-BNI + RPC) given 15 min before the RPC, or CTOP (1 mg/kg, intravenous; CTOP + RPC) given 10 min before the RPC. Values are means ± SD. *  P  < 0.01  versus  control; †  P  < 0.01  versus  RPC. 
Fig. 4. The effect of opioid antagonists on remifentanil preconditioning. Infarct size (IS) expressed as a percentage of the area-at-risk (AAR). Infarct sizes in rat hearts subjected to control, remifentanil preconditioning (RPC, remifentanil 6 μg·kg−1·min−1×3), naltrindole (5 mg/kg, intravenous; NTD + RPC) given 10 min before the RPC, nor-binaltorphimine (5 mg/kg, intravenous; nor-BNI + RPC) given 15 min before the RPC, or CTOP (1 mg/kg, intravenous; CTOP + RPC) given 10 min before the RPC. Values are means ± SD. *  P  < 0.01  versus  control; †  P  < 0.01  versus  RPC. 
×
Fig. 5. The effect of opioid antagonists on ischemic preconditioning. Infarct size (IS) expressed as a percentage of the area-at-risk (AAR). Infarct sizes in rat hearts subjected to control, NTD or NTD+IPC (naltrindole 5 mg/kg, intravenous; 10 min before ischemia or IPC), CTOP or CTOP+IPC (CTOP 1 mg/kg, intravenous; 10 min before ischemia or IPC), nor-BNI or nor-BNI+IPC (nor-binaltorphimine, 5 mg/kg, intravenous; 15 min before ischemia), ischemic preconditioning (IPC). Values are means ± SD. *  P  < 0.01  versus  control; †  P  < 0.01  versus  IPC. 
Fig. 5. The effect of opioid antagonists on ischemic preconditioning. Infarct size (IS) expressed as a percentage of the area-at-risk (AAR). Infarct sizes in rat hearts subjected to control, NTD or NTD+IPC (naltrindole 5 mg/kg, intravenous; 10 min before ischemia or IPC), CTOP or CTOP+IPC (CTOP 1 mg/kg, intravenous; 10 min before ischemia or IPC), nor-BNI or nor-BNI+IPC (nor-binaltorphimine, 5 mg/kg, intravenous; 15 min before ischemia), ischemic preconditioning (IPC). Values are means ± SD. *  P  < 0.01  versus  control; †  P  < 0.01  versus  IPC. 
Fig. 5. The effect of opioid antagonists on ischemic preconditioning. Infarct size (IS) expressed as a percentage of the area-at-risk (AAR). Infarct sizes in rat hearts subjected to control, NTD or NTD+IPC (naltrindole 5 mg/kg, intravenous; 10 min before ischemia or IPC), CTOP or CTOP+IPC (CTOP 1 mg/kg, intravenous; 10 min before ischemia or IPC), nor-BNI or nor-BNI+IPC (nor-binaltorphimine, 5 mg/kg, intravenous; 15 min before ischemia), ischemic preconditioning (IPC). Values are means ± SD. *  P  < 0.01  versus  control; †  P  < 0.01  versus  IPC. 
×
Table 1. Hemodynamic Parameters in Series 1 
Image not available
Table 1. Hemodynamic Parameters in Series 1 
×