Free
Erratum  |   April 2012
Minimally Invasive Measurement of Cardiac Output during Surgery and Critical Care: A Meta-analysis of Accuracy and Precision
Article Information
Erratum
Erratum   |   April 2012
Minimally Invasive Measurement of Cardiac Output during Surgery and Critical Care: A Meta-analysis of Accuracy and Precision
Anesthesiology 4 2012, Vol.116, 973. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e31824ef294
Anesthesiology 4 2012, Vol.116, 973. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e31824ef294
In the article appearing on page 1220 of the November 2010 issue, the meta-analysis reported included four research articles that were subsequently retracted. After removing the results from these articles and re-performing the meta-analysis, the revised results, originally in table 2, are as follows:
Table. No title available.
Image not available
Table. No title available.
×
Two subanalyses in the Discussion also required revision. For studies published over the last 5 yr, the revised pooled weighted percentage error for pulse contour (13 studies) is 49.1%, and for transthoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) (5 studies) it is 50.2%. For the older software versions of the Vigileo/FloTrac device (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA), the revised percentage error is 46.5%, and for versions 1.07 and later the revised percentage error is 50.9%.
Reference
Reference
Peyton PJ, Chong SW: Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: A meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. ANESTHESIOLOGY 2010; 113:1220–35
Table. No title available.
Image not available
Table. No title available.
×