Free
Correspondence  |   September 2013
In Reply
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Jean-Louis Vincent, M.D., Ph.D.
    Erasme Hospital, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. jlvincen@ulb.ac.be
  • (Accepted for publication April 25, 2013.)
    (Accepted for publication April 25, 2013.)×
Article Information
Correspondence
Correspondence   |   September 2013
In Reply
Anesthesiology 09 2013, Vol.119, 726. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e31829e090c
Anesthesiology 09 2013, Vol.119, 726. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e31829e090c
In Reply:
It is very important to optimize cardiac output and oxygen delivery by optimizing fluid therapy, and pulse pressure variation can help to identify fluid responsiveness. Dr. Sondergaard is right in underlining all the limitations of pulse pressure variation, but anesthesia provides an ideal setting for the use of pulse pressure variation as there is no spontaneous breathing effort during controlled mechanical ventilation and usually no bronchospasm or right heart failure.
Dr. Sondergaard reinforces our provocative statement that we may not have to measure cardiac output during surgery1  when he writes that “YES, we have to measure cardiac output in high-risk surgery to optimize oxygen delivery” without detailing how the measurement can help practically; this sounds to us rather like dogma.
Reference
Reference
Vincent, JL, Fagnoul, D Do we need to monitor cardiac output during major surgery?. Anesthesiology. (2012). 117 1151–2 [Article] [PubMed]